Solve the inequality.
3x + 5
———- <4
2

x < [?]

Answer:

8.9k

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter is the area around the object.

1.8k - 5 + 3.5 + 6.1k + k + 1.5

Combine like terms:

1.8k + 6.1k + k = 8.9k

-5 + 3.5 + 1.5 = 0

Therefore 8.9k is the answer. You dont need to include the +0 because it will not add anything to the answer. In the most simplified form, the answer is 8.9k

Hope that helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12.5 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

16 ounces = 1 pound

200 ounces = 1 × 200/16 = 12.5 pounds

Answer:

k < -4 or k > 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's take a look at the graph, we can see that the arrows point towards both directions, both dots are open, meaning that we can only have < and > signs. We can see that the arrow pointing to the left contains numbers that are less than -4, so that part of the compound inequality must be k < -4. And on the other side, they are numbers that are greater than 13, so that part must be k > 13. Thus, the answer must be d.

Hopes this helps.

Answer:

[tex]{ \tt{C - 9 \geqslant 9}} \\ \\ { \tt{C \geqslant 9 + 9}} \\ \\ { \rm{answer}} : \: { \tt{C \geqslant 18}}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

or

Answer:

2 : 3 is ur ratio

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 : 3 is ur ratio

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. R>S

b. It means that R is to the right of S

c. City R is warmer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

20*2.5=50

50*0.75=37.5

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer:270

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=-3

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

x=-2y

x-y=9

substitute -2y for x in the second equation

you get:

-2y-y=9

combine like terms

-3y=9

divide by -3 on both sides

y=-3

The equation that represents they function f(x) = (1.6)^x after it has been translated 5 units up and 9 units to the right is;

g(x) = [(1.6)^(x - 9)] + 5

We are given the function;

f(x) = (1.6)^x

Now,when we translate a function 9 units to the right, it means that we will subtract 9 from the x unit to give;

g(x) = (1.6)^(x - 9)

Now, when we translate it 5 units upwards, it means we are adding 5 to f(x). Therefore, we now have;

g(x) = [(1.6)^(x - 9)] + 5

Read more on translation of graphs at; https://brainly.com/question/11468584

Step-by-step explanation:

just want your ponit hahahaHA

Answer:

4cm

Step-by-step explanation:

it this the answer you were looking for?

Answer:

91cm

Step-by-step explanation:

7m to cm =700m

28cm+700cm=728cm

728cm/8=91cm

Answer: 19 coins

Step-by-step explanation:

38-19=19

To check, take any one of the nubers and replace it with x, and when you solve for x. you'll get that number back. For example:

Let x represent the amount used to buy a notebook

19+x=38

x=38-19

x=19

Answer:

1 hour = $9.2

Step-by-step explanation:

The question says that:

Brody makes $78.20 in 8.5 hours.

So,

8.5 hours = $78.20

We need to find 1 hour pay.

So, divide both sides of the above equation by 8.5

8.5 / 8.5 hours = $78.20 / 8.5

1 hour = $9.2

[tex]\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Step-by-step explanation:

Pythagoras :

c² = a² + b²

c is the Hypotenuse (side opposite of the right angle), which is in our case the distance of the 2 cars.

after 2 hours the east car was driving x miles. and the south car was driving x + 2×25 = x + 50 miles.

x² + (x + 50)² = 250²

x² + x² + 100x + 2,500 = 62,500

2x² + 100x = 60,000

x² + 50x = 30,000

x² + 50x - 30,000 = 0

the solution for a quadratic equation is

x = (-b ± sqrt(b² - 4ac))/(2a)

in our case

a = 1

b = 50

c = -30,000

x = (-50 ± sqrt(2500 - 4×1×-30000))/(2×1) =

= (-50 ± sqrt(2500 + 120000)/2 =

= (-50 ± sqrt(122500))/2 = (-50 ± 350)/2 =

= -25 ± 175

x1 = -25 + 175 = 150 miles

x2 = -25 - 175 = -200 miles.

negative distances don't make any sense here in our scenario, so the solution is x = 150 miles.

therefore, the east car was going 75 mph (traveled in 2 hours 150 miles).

and the south car was going 75 + 25 = 100 mph (traveled in 2 hours 200 miles).

Answer:

Factored form: [tex](x-3)(x+1)(x^2+9)[/tex]

Expanded form: [tex]x^4-2x^3+6x^2-18x-27[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex](x-3)(x+1)(x^2+9)[/tex]

[tex](x^2-2x-3)(x^2+9)[/tex]

[tex]x^4+9x^2-2x^3-18x-3x^2-27[/tex]

[tex]x^4-2x^3+6x^2-18x-27[/tex]

[tex]x-3=0[/tex] has a solution of [tex]x=3[/tex]

[tex]x+1=0[/tex] has a solution of [tex]x=-1[/tex]

[tex]x^2+9=0[/tex] has a solution of [tex]x=\pm 3i[/tex]

Answer:

$10.60

Step-by-step explanation:

Sarawong ends with $11.40, and we need to find his weekly allowance by working backward. First, we learn that he earned $6.10 of that total amount of money by washing the dog, so we can subtract the two values:

11.4 - 6.1 = 5.3

So, before washing the dog, Sarawong had $5.30. But he only received this after spending half of his weekly allowance, so $5.30 must be half of his weekly allowance. If we multiply $5.30 by 2, we should be able to find his weekly allownce.

5.3 × 2 = 10.6

Now, we can check our work. First, he spends half of his weekly allowance on candy. Half of 10.6 is 5.3, so he now has $5.30. Then, he earns $6.10 more by washing the dog. 5.3 + 6.1 = 11.4, which is the ending value. So, our work was correct! Hopefully that's helpful. :)

Therefore, the answer is 3x - 2.

Hoped this helped.

[tex]BrainiacUser1357[/tex]

The type of laboratory that is not required to have coved floors is a BSL2.

Safety in laboratories is measured through the Biosafety Level scale. This scale evaluates how much protection do people working in the laboratory need to avoid any risks while working with pathogens or toxins.

This scale goes from 1 to 4 and the 4 level represents labs in which extremely dangerous pathogens are studied, and therefore labs with the highest safety protocols.

In this context, coved floors are not required for labs classified in Biosafety level 2 because in these labs pathogens have only a moderate risk, therefore some precautions such as the coved floors are not required.

Learn more about labs in: https://brainly.com/question/14428286

Answer: 126

Step-by-step explanation:

A=2(wl+hl+hw)

Answer:

I don't know if i did this correctly because i can't find my notes but i hoped i helped.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4x^2-8x+244

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

use Pythagoras theorem

that is a²+b²=c²

so 4.5²+b²= 18²

rearrange to b²=18²-4.5²

so you get b=

[tex] \sqrt{303.75} [/tex]

that is equal to 17.42842506

Answer:

The answer is 15!

Step-by-step explanation:

225 divided by 15 is 15! Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

38cm squared

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=3

Step-by-step explanation:

m=0

b=3

Answer:

These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher.  They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b.  Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method.  As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important.  Some of this may sound completely alien to you.  Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n')  become larger than 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just to add a bit more information, "Elimination" Can have a variety of other interpretations.  Elimination techniques typically refer to 'row reduction' to achieve 'row echelon form.'  Do not worry if you have not heard of these terms.  They are used in Linear Algebra when referring to "Elimination techniques"

Gaussian Elimination

Gauss-Jordan Elimination

LU-Decomposition

QR-Decomposition

These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher.  They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b.  Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method.  As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important.  Some of this may sound completely alien to you.  Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n')  become larger than 2.

Substitution is the preferred method for 2 equations in 2 unknowns.  The constants are unimportant other than having a non-zero determinant.  It is always easy to find multiplicative factors using LCMs of one variable or the other to allow substitution into the other equation:

Example:

4X + 5Y = 9

5X -  4Y = 1

Notice that 20 is a LCM of either the X or Y variable.  So multiply the first by 4 and the second by 5 and then adding the two (Y's will drop out allowing for substitution)

4(4X + 5Y = 9)

5(5X -  4Y = 1)  

Multiplying to produce the LCM factors:

16X + 20Y = 36

25X -  20Y = 5

Adding the equations

41X = 41

X = 1

Substitution into either equation yields

Y = 1

Elimination techniques are preferred for Rank-n>3

Answer:

I like the view