Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.
We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.
Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.
True or False: Lobbyists gain access to government officials by donating to campaigns.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Usatestprep
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached and you did not include the SSA case, we can only comment on formal authority.
When we use the term formal authority, we mean that is the kind of power that a company gives to a leader in a corporation. For example, when a new manager is hired by a company, he is granted the power to lead the company or any of its departments. At this moment, the manager has the power and influence over its employees.
However, there is another concept called informal authority, that does not come from the owners of the company or the high hierarchy. It comes from your employees, the people. It is the moment when people trust who you are and follow you for what you have shown, not for your position in the company.
That is why it is so important to have both kinds of authority because it is the best way to lead people under difficult circumstances.
At the beginning of the trial, why did Gideon not have a lawyer?
The state of New York passes a law that prohibits transgender persons from going to the bathrooms of their choice. Max, an adult, identifies as a transgender female. Max’s parents, enraged at the law, file a lawsuit against the state of New York, claiming that the transgender bathroom law violates the U.S. Constitution in that it is discriminatory. 1) What is the state of New York’s best defense against this lawsuit? 2) What would you recommend to Max’s family to make the lawsuit stronger?
Answer and Explanation:
1. The state of New York can claim that they are within the rights defended by the bathroom bill (since this law allows the restriction of transgender people to bathrooms that are not determined by their gender of birth) and that the decision was made to maintain the safety of cisgender people.
2. I would recommend that the family look for facts that prove that this measure does not promote the safety of anyone, as there have never been cases of attacks by transgender individuals on cisgender individuals in public bathrooms, on the contrary, this measure causes insecurity for transgender individuals. , since there are countless cases of attacks on these individuals due to prejudice, homophobia and intolerance. In addition, the family may claim that the bathroom bill also advocates allowing transgender individuals to access toilets that match their gender identity, as a measure of security and promoting equality.
As an estimation we are told £3 is €4. Convert £15 to euros
Answer:
20
Explanation:
Based on the estimation of £3 to €4, then £15 to euros will be 20 euros.
This is because if £3 is equal to €4 the to get the amount of euro, we would divide the £15 by £3, then multiply by €4.
Therefore, in this case, £15 divided by £3 gives £5.
That means we will have multiples of 5 of €4 in the conversion we are looking for.
Hence, the multiple of 5 of €4 gives us €20 or 20 Euros.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer or conversion of euro we would get is 20 Euros.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24896081
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:
B
Explanation:
5.
How did Gideon's Case get to the Supreme Court?
Answer:
Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge's refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon's constitutional rights.
Explanation:
plz mark me as a brainiestThe _______is the head of the Executive branch at the Federal level and the is the_______head of the Executive branch at the state level.
Cabinet, President
Mayor, President
Vice President, Governor
President, Governor
The Federalist 10
Brutus 1
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution
In your essay, you must:
✓ Respond to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning.
✓ Support your claim with specific and relevant evidence.
✓ Use one piece of evidence from one of foundational documents listed above.
Answer:78
Explanation:78
WHY DO PEOPLE POST RANDOM AND DISTURBING QUESTIONS?
Answer:
could i have an example?
Explanation:
The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school student whose locker was searched after school officials had reason to believe she was distributing drugs and cigarettes. She was found guilty and sentenced to a one-year probation. TLO appealed the decision all the way to the Supreme Court, which initially decided that her 4th Amendment rights (which protect a person’s home, belongings and body from being searched without just cause) had been violated. However, upon re-arguing the case, “the Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was reasonable under the circumstances”.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s final decision or their initial? Why or why not? In your answer, discuss the Fourth Amendment, how it applies to this case, and which verdict you agree with (the initial or final verdict).
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education overturned which long-standing public policy?
O
the policy that allowed for segregated schools and other public services, as long as the services and buildings serving black patrons were
equal to those serving white patrons
O the policy that public education should be provided at no cost
O the policy that allowed black students to attend school
O the policy that allowed history textbooks to remove any reference to the Civil War and slavery
© 2016 Glynlyon, Inc.
< PREVIOUS
NEXT
SAVE
SUBMIT
2016 Glynlyon, Inc. All rights reserved
V6.0.3-0038 20200504 mainline
US 1:1
Regarding age and gender related to violent crime victimization, choose the most accurate statement:
* a. Young males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* b. Young females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* c. Older males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* d. Older females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
Why has probation become so important to the operation of law enforcement?
It is the most commonly applied sanction.
It is the most underused sanction.
It has become a sadly ineffective sanction.
It is the sanction preferred by judges.
Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction
Explanation:
"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.
create a blank Levels/Branches grid (4 rows x 3 columnst label the levels and
branches on the outside of the box and find a news headline on the internet that
contains the appropriate term Place entire head ine in correct box and label that
box with correct term ("Congress", "Sheriff, etc)
so in john 10 are we the sheep
If criminal behavior is learned, who taught the first criminal?
The shape of a sign indicates what type of sign it is ? true or false
Answer:
true
Explanation:
a stop sign is an octagon that how you tell when its faded
What are social causes
Answer: Some examples of social causes include:
Fighting poverty.
Preventing bullying.
Civil Rights Advocacy.
LGBTQ+ advocacy.
Fighting for or against immigration.
Raising money for life-saving medical research.
Helping the homeless, etc.
Explanation:
in trials that receive a lot of media attention the judge my sequester ,the jury to prevent them from having access to outside influences like television or the Internet do you think this is fair ? why or why not?
Answer:
It is necessary to sequester the jury in order to avoid accidental or deliberate tainting by outside forces. I.E., The media or social media. The reason this can be a detriment is because you're basing your judgment with bias. Therefore, the trial is not impartial.
Explanation:
Judges have done this in high profile cases. The jury is more selective and more discreet.
Which of the following BEST describes the legal term “double jeopardy”? A. An accused person cannot face trial for the same crime twice. B. An accused person can request a second trial through appeal. C. A victim of a crime can request a retrial if the accused is acquitted. D. A police officer may search a scene twice using the same warrant.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
While double jeopardy prohibits different prosecutions for the same offense, it does not protect defendants from multiple prosecutions for multiple offenses. For example, a person acquitted of a murder could be tried again on the “lesser included offense” of involuntary manslaughter. The U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment contains a Double Jeopardy Clause, which says that no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Most state constitutions similarly protect individuals from being tried twice for the same crime.
When acceleration is positive does that mean it is always increasing in speed?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
it's more complicated than that.
acceleration can be positive but be slowing down in speed at the same time.
Compaq Ltd has a net income after tax of $2 000 000 for the year ended 30 June 2018. At the beginning of the period Compaq Ltd has 900 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares on issue. On 1 January 2018 Compaq Ltd had issued a further 300 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares at an issue price of $2.00. On 1 March 2018 Compaq Ltd made a one-for-five bonus issue of ordinary shares out of retained earnings. The last sale price of an ordinary share before the bonus issue was $2.50. At the beginning of the current period Compaq Ltd also had 500 000, $1.00, 5% cumulative preference shares on issue. The dividends on the preference shares are not treated as expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. The basic earnings per share for the period ended 30 June 2017 was $1.50 per share. Required: a) Calculate the basic
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Here are the questions:
a. Calculate the basic EPS amount for 2018.
b. Explain what is diluted EPS. Give one example of a security that can dilute the basic EPS.
First, we need to calculate the weighted average number of equity shares. This will be:
= (900,000 × 12/12) + (300,000 × 12/12) + (240,000 × 10/12)
= 900,000 + 300,000 + 200,000
= 1,400,000
We then calculate the earnings for equity shares. This will be:
Net income = 2,000,000
Less: Dividend on preference shares
= 500,000 × 5% = 25,000
Earnings for equity share = 1,975,000
EPS = 1,975,000/1,400,000
= 1.41
b. Diluted earnings per share (diluted EPS) is used to calculate the earning per share for a company's in a situation whereby there's a conversion of all the convertible securities.
An example of a security that can dilute the basic earnings per share is the preference shares which have been converted.
explain the difference of offer and invitation to treat.
What is the difference between offer and invitation to treat?
An offer is made when a person shows a willingness to enter into a legally binding contract. An invitation to treat (I.T.T) is merely a supply of information to tempt a person into making an offer.
Who is responsible for investigating potential wrong-doing by federal officials assigned to any of the executive departments and their respective
agencies and bureaus?
The General Services Administration
the inspector general
there is no oversight of federal officials
the attorney general
Encoding and Decoding are in a constant cycle in a good speech, this means that the speaker is sending a message and the audience is receiving it and sending feedback in return.
True or False
You are interviewed by a prospective employer concerning a job that you have coveted for several years. After protracted (lengthy) negotiations, you are presented with a pre-printed form contract that contains the terms of your employment agreement.
In the body of the agreement, it states, “This document contains the full and complete understanding and agreement by and between the parties. No other representations or promises have been made. Both parties understand that this contract is a wholly integrated agreement.” This language appeared somewhere in the middle of the 4 page pre-printed form.
Just prior to signing the agreement, the employer made several promises to you, including but not limited to the following:
You will receive a year-end bonus each and every year that will be based on your performance
Your health insurance will be paid by the company after you complete your probationary period of six months
You will be reimbursed for auto expenses that you incur while using your car for business purposes.
The employer refused to honor ANY of the above oral promises and also fired you without cause. You sue the employer and attempt to introduce evidence of the oral promises. Your employer objects.
What are the legal arguments favoring your employer that if accepted by the court, would prevent you from introducing evidence of the promises?
What are the legal arguments that you would make to convince the court to allow you to introduce the oral promises?
Answer:
The legal argument favoring the employer it is his decision to employ u if he wants.
The legal that you would make to convince the court is the agreement paper u bring it to the court has sign of evidence of the promises or agreement. it might be able to covince them to believe u.
Plz don't report me
Why is it so difficult to respond to terrorism
Answer:
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government or its citizens to further certain political or social objectives. Law enforcement generally recognizes two types of terrorism: domestic and international.
Explanation: