Explain the comparison king makes between the African American struggle for equality and the cashing of a check?
answer choices
Words can be powerful enough to change the world
He's telling the white people that it's time to step up
King says giving freedom that is not truly free is like giving people a check that they can't cash

Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are -Benjamin Franklin

This quote highlights the importance of empathy and solidarity in ensuring that justice is served. The idea is that justice is not truly achieved unless everyone, regardless of whether they are directly impacted by a particular issue or not, is equally passionate and motivated to fight for it.

When people who are unaffected are just as outraged as those who are directly impacted, it creates a more powerful force for change and holds those in positions of power accountable.

Therefore, The quote emphasizes the importance of understanding the perspectives and experiences of others, and using this understanding to fight for a more just and equitable society.

Learn more about Justice form

https://brainly.com/question/25756666

#SPJ1

The United States Constitution, as well as the constitutions of other nations, both uphold the idea of "no ex post facto laws." Ex post facto refers to laws that modify the legal ramifications or status of actions carried out before the legislation was established. The term is derived from the Latin ex post facto, which means "after the fact."

The "no ex post facto legislation" principle forbids the application of criminal laws retroactively to render an act unlawful after it has already been done or to impose harsher penalties for an already-committed act. This means that the government cannot enact legislation that would criminalize conduct that wasn't already unlawful or that would enhance the penalties for conduct that has already been committed. This rule aims to safeguard people from capricious and retroactive criminal penalties and to advance justice and predictability in the criminal justice system.

For such more question on ex post facto:

brainly.com/question/2498364

#SPJ4

It is true that only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal of the case to a higher court. An appeal is a legal process in which a party to a court case requests that a higher court review the decision of the lower court.

Generally, only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal. The objective of an appeal is to determine if the lower court’s decision was correct and to ensure that the law was correctly applied in the case. The appeals court will review the arguments and evidence presented to the lower court, and may affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court’s decision.

In the United States, there are both state and federal appellate courts. After a decision is made in a lower state court, the losing party can appeal the decision to the state’s highest court. If the losing party is unsatisfied with the decision of the state’s highest court, then they can appeal the decision to the federal appellate court.

To know more about appeal refer to the link  brainly.com/question/23936876

#SPJ4

The sentence that best explains the information in the graphic is A.The secretary was confirmed by a party-line vote.

An infographic, often known as a "information graphic," is a graphic depiction of information intended to make the material quickly and easily understandable. Infographics are used to swiftly convey a message, to make complex data presentations more understandable, to spot links and trends in data, and to track the evolution of variables.

Traffic signs, subway maps, tag clouds, musical scores, and weather charts are just a few examples of the numerous infographics that can be found in nearly any public setting.

All management levels in the company employ infographics to present high-level perspectives of data. Bar graphs, pie charts, histograms, line graphs, and tree diagrams are examples of infographics.

Therefore, option A is correct.

Learn more about  information at:

https://brainly.com/question/24858866

#SPJ1

I agree with the KISS rule of writing ("Keep it Short and Simple") in term of report writing.

According to the "Keep it Short and Simple" (KISS) rule, reports and other papers should be brief and simple to read.

As it encourages simplicity and clarity in communication, this guideline can be helpful in a variety of circumstances.

This guideline does not, however, always hold true for all types of reports or all audiences. For instance, some reports could need a more in-depth examination, which necessitates writing that is more sophisticated or extensive.

The intended audience may also influence the level of technical detail needed, with certain audiences demanding more technical detail than others.

Learn more about report writing:

https://brainly.com/question/28430200

#SPJ4

The fourteenth amendment attempted to guarantee citizenship rights to former slaves.

No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection of the laws. Anyone born in the country or who acquired citizenship was given citizenship and equal civil and legal rights under the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. African Americans and former slaves who had been set free after the American Civil War were included in this.

Learn more about fourteenth amendment here

https://brainly.com/question/7570923

#SPJ4

Explanation:

Discretion is strongly associated with the exercise of judgment and decision-making in law enforcement. It refers to the latitude that an individual police officer has in determining the appropriate course of action in a given situation, taking into account their training, department policies, and the specific circumstances of the case. The use of discretion is a critical aspect of policing as it allows officers to make decisions that balance the enforcement of laws with the protection of individual rights and the needs of the community.

Discretion is strongly associated with police officers' decision-making processes. It refers to the power or freedom that police officers have to make choices and decisions in carrying out their duties and responsibilities

Discretion refers to the ability to make decisions or act on one's own authority and responsibility, especially when it comes to matters requiring judgment, sensitivity, or confidentiality. It is a crucial attribute in many professional and personal contexts and is often closely associated with concepts such as independence, autonomy, and responsibility. In the legal system, discretion is the power given to a judge to make decisions based on their own judgment and the specific circumstances of a case, rather than being bound by strict rules or precedents. Similarly, in the fields of law enforcement and the military, discretion is often exercised by individuals in positions of authority, who must weigh the consequences of their actions and make decisions that serve the greater good.

Learn more about judgment :

https://brainly.com/question/14969838

#SPJ4

The concept of a "pure legal advocate" refers to a lawyer who is solely focused on advocating for their client within the bounds of the law. This means that their primary responsibility is to represent their client's interests and argue for their legal rights, regardless of their personal opinions or beliefs about the case.

To be a good "pure legal advocate," a lawyer must possess several key qualities. Firstly, they must have a strong understanding of the law and be well-versed in the legal system. This includes having knowledge of relevant laws, precedents, and court procedures.

Additionally, a good "pure legal advocate" must be an effective communicator. They should be able to present their client's case persuasively, both in writing and in oral argument. They must be able to clearly articulate the legal arguments and evidence in support of their client's position.

Another important quality is impartiality. As a "pure legal advocate," a lawyer must be able to set aside their personal opinions and beliefs and remain neutral in their representation of their client. This can be challenging, especially in controversial or emotionally charged cases. However, it is critical to maintaining their credibility as a legal advocate.

Finally, a good "pure legal advocate" must have a strong ethical compass. They must adhere to the standards of professionalism and integrity, and maintain the confidentiality of their client's information. This is essential to building trust with their client and maintaining the integrity of the legal system.

In summary, being a "pure legal advocate" requires a combination of legal expertise, strong communication skills, impartiality, and ethical behavior. These qualities enable lawyers to effectively represent their clients and ensure that justice is served within the legal system.

For more about a pure legal advocate:

https://brainly.com/question/13402559

#SPJ11

Thecruel and unusual punishments The Eighth Amendment's clause is its most significant and contentious element. The Clause is mysterious in certain respects.

About the origins of the phrase "cruel and unusual punishments," we do know some things. A Bill of Rights was enacted in England in 1689, more than a century before the United States Constitution was ratified, that forbade "cruell and unusuall penalties." The Virginia Declaration of Rights, which George Mason authored in 1776, forbade the use of cruel and unusual punishments. This similar ban was made the centerpiece of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1791.

The United States Constitution did not have a Bill of Rights when it was initially passed by the states, and it did not forbid harsh and unusual punishments. After the Constitution was ratified, several safeguards were included. The arguments that took place during the states' deliberations on whether to ratify the Constitution help clarify the purpose of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause by illuminating the reasons that many people believed this clause was necessary.

To know more about cruel and unusual punishments:

https://brainly.com/question/29615431

#SPJ4

Answer:

The American Constitution has survived as the guiding principle of American governance for several reasons. Firstly, it is a flexible document that can adapt to changing times and circumstances through the amendment process. Secondly, it establishes a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, which helps to prevent any one branch from having too much power. Additionally, it guarantees individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, which have become deeply ingrained in American culture and are fiercely protected by the American people.

The American Constitution does play a role in America's "exceptionalism," but it is not the only factor. American exceptionalism refers to the belief that the United States is a unique and superior nation with a special destiny. This belief is based on a combination of factors, including the country's rich history, its political and economic systems, and its cultural values. The American Constitution is one of the key components of this belief, as it enshrines the values and principles that have made the United States what it is today.

In conclusion, the American Constitution has been a crucial factor in the survival and success of American governance, but it is not the only factor that has contributed to America's exceptionalism. It is the combination of many factors, including the Constitution, that make the United States unique and exceptional.

Yes, a Texas appeals judge can be impeached. According to the Texas Constitution, any elected official, including judges, can be impeached for high crimes, misdemeanors, or other forms of official misconduct.

The process of impeachment begins in the Texas House of Representatives, where a vote must be taken to determine whether the evidence of misconduct is sufficient to warrant an impeachment trial in the Texas Senate.

If a judge is impeached and found guilty of the charges by the Senate, they can be removed from office and barred from holding any future public office in the state of Texas.

The ability to impeach a judge serves as a check on the power of the judiciary and ensures accountability and transparency in the administration of justice.

Texas appeals judge can be impeached if they are found to have engaged in serious misconduct while in office. The process of impeachment is a crucial aspect of maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and ensuring that judges are held accountable for their actions.

To learn more about impeachment refer here

https://brainly.com/question/1411922#

#SPJ11

The primary principle of the law of conservation of matter maintains to explain that the amount of matter does not get created or destroyed before and after a change has been experienced.

The law of conservation of matter can usually be taken into interpretation as the law that states about the condition of matter in any substance before and after there is an experience of change in any of its compositions. This law states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, irrespective of the changes that take place.

Learn more about law of conservation here:

https://brainly.com/question/24131537

#SPJ4

It is factually correct to be mentioning that the 'in rem jurisdiction' is also known as the judicial authority over the person. So, the aforementioned statement holds true.

A judicial authority may be generally understood as the legal right that is better off against a person as per the provided regulations thereunder. Such authority invoked against a person by law is also regarded as an ''in rem jurisdiction'', and can never be questioned. This authority is legally binding upon the every person under its scope.

Learn more about judicial authority here:

https://brainly.com/question/2516262

#SPJ4

TRUE OR FALSE

judicial authority over the person is known as in rem jurisdiction.

The federal government had to shut down due to a lack of funds appropriated rational material.

at the beginning of the new 2014 federal fiscal year because the Senate refused to pass the bill with provisions to delay the Affordable Care Act, and the two legislative houses had not developed a compromise bill by the end of September 2013 either. Due to furloughs of federal workers, reduced public services, and delays in payments to Federal grantees, States, localities, contractors, and people, the closure had an impact on millions of Americans. Government shutdowns take place in the United States when financing bills for the government's upcoming fiscal year or a temporary funding measure are not passed. Federal agencies continue to carry out their mandates countrywide. crucial activities and processes as decided by agency heads. To confirm your telework schedule and to get more information from your agency head, please get in touch with your supervisor rational material.

Learn more about rational here :

https://brainly.com/question/30359155

#SPJ4

Federal judges are appointed by the President and must be approved by the Senate.

In general, the president of a country serves as the formal head of state, head of the executive branch, and essential leader of the country. The Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces and the head of state and government of the United States of America are the President. According to Article II of the Constitution, the President is in charge of carrying out and upholding the laws passed by Congress.

The House of Representatives is the lower body of the United States Congress, and the United States Senate is its upper chamber. The United States' national bicameral legislature is made up of them all.

To learn more about president  here

brainly.com/question/23963476

#SPJ4

Rational choice theory is an updated version of classical criminology. Classical criminology, which emerged in the 18th century, emphasized individual free will and rationality as the key determinants of criminal behavior.

According to classical criminologists, individuals choose to engage in criminal behavior after weighing the potential rewards and risks of their actions. Rational choice theory is an updated version of classical criminology that takes into account contemporary understandings of crime and criminal behavior. Rational choice theorists argue that individuals engage in criminal behavior when the potential benefits outweigh the costs, including the risk of being caught and punished.

Rational choice theory emphasizes the role of individual decision-making in criminal behavior and suggests that crime can be reduced by increasing the perceived risks and costs associated with criminal activity. This approach has been used to develop crime prevention strategies, such as increasing the visibility of security measures or increasing the likelihood of punishment for criminal activity.

Learn more about criminologists :

https://brainly.com/question/14313357

#SPJ4

An insurer has  fifteen (15) days days to file a notice of appointment to the commissioner.

An insurer is a third party who agrees to compensate individuals, businesses, or other organizations for specific financial losses. A financial loss would include the destruction of a home due to a fire or the loss of a vehicle due to an accident — any event that leaves the client in a worse financial position than before the event occurred.

While an insurance company is the "insurer," the person who buys insurance is the "insured." The contractual agreement between the insurer and the insured specifies the exact losses covered and the exact cost of the premiums. Each party must abide by certain conditions in order for the insured to be compensated for their loss.

Learn more about  an insurer

https://brainly.com/question/27822778

#SPJ4

president truman used his executive power to enforce: The federal protection of voting rights.

President Harry Truman established the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services on July 26, 1948, by signing Executive Order 9981. The desegregation of the American military was required under the directive. The opening line of the executive order states, "It is therefore declared to be the policy of the President that there will be equality of treatment and opportunity for all individuals in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin." This policy shall take effect as soon as is reasonably possible, taking into account the time required to execute any necessary adjustments without detriment to productivity or morale.

To know more about truman:

https://brainly.com/question/3543190

#SPJ4

Note that Jimmy Ray Payne was a key piece of evidence in the conviction of Wayne Williams for the Atlanta Child Murders. Payne was the last person seen with one of the victims and his murder was similar in nature to the others attributed to Wayne Williams.

Wayne Bertram Williams is a convicted murderer and suspected serial killer from the United States who is spending life in prison for the 1981 murders of two men in Atlanta, Georgia.

After Payne's death, fibers found on his clothing were traced back to Wayne Williams' home and car. This evidence was instrumental in linking Williams to the Atlanta Child Murders and helped to establish a pattern of similar fibers found on other victims.

Additionally, the testimony of an expert witness regarding the fibers found on Payne's clothing helped to establish a connection between Williams and the other victims. This evidence was used by the prosecution to build a case against Williams and helped to secure his conviction for the murders of Jimmy Ray Payne and two other young men.

Learn more about Wayne Williams:
https://brainly.com/question/3235308

#SPJ1

If you are not a government employee, military member, or contractor and are in a situation where you feel you need to disclose an insider threat, you should get in touch with your local law enforcement or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

An insider danger is the possibility that a worker or contractor will improperly or intentionally exploit their access to compromise American security.

The term "insider threat" does not apply to any attack that comes from an unreliable, unidentified, external source. So that any abnormal traffic behaviors may be found, insider threats necessitate advanced monitoring and logging systems.

For more information on insider threat kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/27671019

#SPJ4

Ms. Williams was furious and intends to sue. Her suit will likely: d.Fail because hotels have a limited right to refuse guests who have previously defrauded them.

Ms. Williams's lawsuit against the hotel will likely fail because hotels have a limited right to refuse guests who have previously defrauded them. This is based on the idea that hotels are businesses and have the right to protect themselves from financial harm.

Therefore, The hotel's refusal of Ms. Williams's check-in is based on the fact that she used a stolen credit card during her last stay at the hotel, and they want to protect themselves from potential financial harm that may occur if she repeats this behavior. While it is important to respect the rights of individuals, in this case, the hotel's right to protect its financial interests overrides the right of Ms. Williams to check in.

Learn more about suing  form

https://brainly.com/question/1065754

#SPJ1

For investors in commercial real estate, medical office buildings are a class of assets that is growing in appeal. According to both the demand for services and the shortage of healthcare professionals, the healthcare sector is one of the fastest-growing in the country.

To learn more about medical office refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/6626489

#SPJ1

Answer: Judge judy

Explanation:

The Antifederalists contended that a written constitution and the preservation of individual rights like freedom of speech, religion, and property should restrict the powers of the government. They feared that these rights would be threatened by an overly powerful central authority.

When the federal Constitution was being ratified in the United States in the late 18th century, a political movement known as the Antifederalists opposed it. They said the proposed Constitution endangered the sovereignty of the states and the rights of individuals to their individual liberty and gave the federal government too much authority. In order to protect personal liberties including the right to free speech, religion, and property, antifederalists argued for the establishment of a bill of rights. They wanted the federal government to be more constrained. Even though they objected, the Constitution was approved in 1788, and the Antifederalist views influenced the decision to include the Bill of Rights in the Constitution in 1791.

To learn more about antifederalists visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/13838143

#SPJ4

When the Master and Boatswain arrive, they announce that the ship is in the same condition as "when we first put out to sea."

The officer (or enlisted person) in command of the sails, rigging, anchors, cables, etc., and all deck operations on a sailing ship is known as a boatswain (plural boatswains). the petty officer in charge of overseeing the activities of other sailors on a merchant ship. A type of gull called a jaeger.

They served as the navy's standing officers and repaired and sailed the ships. The officer in charge of maintaining the rigging, baling twine, anchors, sails, boats, flags, and other stores was known as the boatswain.

The Bureau of Navy Personnel (BUPERS) assigns enlisted soldiers who'd been rated or "qualifying" for a said rating of deck seaman the professional rating for boatswain's mate (referred to simply as BM).

Learn more about boatswain here:

https://brainly.com/question/1456326

#SPJ4

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion) is a specific format for organizing legal arguments and writing about legal cases, while APA (American Psychological Association) format is a writing style used primarily in the social sciences for academic and research papers.

The main differences between IRAC and APA format are the purpose, structure, and content of the writing. IRAC focuses on legal analysis and draws conclusions about the application of the law, while APA format focuses on presenting research findings and providing references and citations.

to know more about apa format refer here

https://brainly.com/question/12548905#

#SPJ11

In America, Gerry Spence is regarded as one of the best trial and criminal lawyers. As a prosecutor or defense lawyer, he has never once lost a criminal case, and since 1969, he hasn't lost a civil case either.

Gerald Leonard Spence, an American trial lawyer who is currently in semi-retirement, was born on January 8, 1929. He belongs to the Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Since 1969, Spence has not lost a civil case, and as a prosecutor or defense attorney, he has never lost a criminal case in front of a jury.

Spence tried a number of notable cases after the Silkwood case. Since 1969, he has not lost a civil case, and he has never lost a criminal case with a jury trial. In addition to having several of his more notable civil decisions overturned on appeal, he also had a manslaughter case from 1985 that he lost in a bench trial in Newport, Oregon, but won on appeal.

To know more about spence :

https://brainly.com/question/4410226

#SPJ4

In the court case of McCulloch v Maryland, the ruling made by the court was in the favor of Maryland state, who was the defendant in the case.

The rulings made by the Supreme Court are sometimes interpreted as the landmark decisions due to the significance that they hold due to the decisions being made. The court case mentioned above has been an indispensable part of the decisions that have been made till now in the essence of the support towards the government bodies favored by the Supreme Court.

Learn more about court case here:

https://brainly.com/question/4564773

#SPJ4

The Supreme court docket case snyder v. phelps is an example of competing rights because the proper of privacy and speech inflicting emotional misery got here into combat with the freedom of speech.

In Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court dominated 8-1 that the First Amendment prohibited the imposition of civil legal responsibility upon a church and its individuals who picketed the funeral of a slain Marine.

In general, competing human rights involve conditions where parties to a dispute claim that the enjoyment of an person or group's human rights and freedoms, as protected by law, would intervene with another's rights and freedoms.

Learn more about Snyder v. Phelps  here:

The act of frightening, making fun of, or degrading another individual is bullying.

Bullying is a form of maltreatment that involves intimidating, making fun of or demeaning another person.

Bullying is when someone is mistreated, violently dominated, or intimidated by the use of force, compulsion, harsh teasing, or threats.

The actions are frequently repeated and ingrained.

A necessary prerequisite is the perception of an imbalance of physical or social power, whether possessed by the bully or by others.

This imbalance is what distinguishes bullying from confrontation.

A hostile intent, an imbalance of power, and recurrence over time set bullying apart from other forms of aggressive behavior.

Bullying is the act of displaying aggressive conduct repeatedly with the intent to cause harm to another person's body, mind, or emotions.

Therefore, intimidating, poking fun at, or demeaning another person is bullying.

Know more about Bullying here:

https://brainly.com/question/25667896

#SPJ4