En un estudio de contaminantes, se cuantificó que el martes anterior se tenían 40 ppm de dióxido de carbono en el ambiente estudiado. Mientras que el jueves se reportó que se tenía 0.004% de esa misma sustancia. ¿Cómo se comparan estos valores?

A.
Las concentraciones no pueden compararse debido a que tienen diferentes unidades.

B.
Las concentraciones son iguales, por lo que se deben monitorear las causas en los dos días.

C.
El jueves hay mayor concentración de contaminante, por lo que se deben tomar medidas únicamente para ese día.

D.
El martes hay mayor concentración de contaminante, por lo que se deben tomar medidas únicamente para ese día.

Answer:

8.87 × 10³ moles.

Explanation:

To convert number of molecules of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) to moles (n), we divide by Avogadro's number (6.02 × 10²³)

That is; n = N ÷ nA

According to the question, 5.34 x 10^27 molecules of SF6 was given in this question. Hence, the number of moles it contains is given as:

n = 5.34 x 10^27 ÷ 6.02 × 10²³

n = 5.34/6.02 × 10^ (27-23)

n = 0.887 × 10⁴

n = 8.87 × 10³ moles.

Answer:

Z negative

Explanation:

The negative charge shows that this is an electron. Electrons are present outside the nucleus of the atom and having negative charge. Usually represented by e-

Answer:

Only Z?

Explanation:

Temperature change

Answer:

valence

Explanation:

the level of energy electrons have within a general shape the energy level is valence.

Answer:

Pb(NO₃)₂ + Na₂CrO₄ —> PbCrO₄ + 2NaNO₃

The coefficients are: 1, 1, 1, 2

Explanation:

Pb(NO₃)₂ + Na₂CrO₄ —> PbCrO₄ + NaNO₃

The above equation can be balance as follow:

Pb(NO₃)₂ + Na₂CrO₄ —> PbCrO₄ + NaNO₃

There are 2 atoms of Na on the left side and 1 atom on the right side. It can be balance by writing 2 before NaNO₃ as shown below:

Pb(NO₃)₂ + Na₂CrO₄ —> PbCrO₄ + 2NaNO₃

Now the equation is balanced.

The coefficients are: 1, 1, 1, 2

Answer:

39.02amu

Explanation:

According to this question, there are four (4) isotopes for element X with the following relative abundance:

Isotope 1 = 9.67%, mass no: 38

Isotope 2 = 78.68%, mass no: 39

Isotope 3 = 11.34%, mass no: 40

Isotope 4 = 0.31%, mass no: 41

To find the average atomic mass of element X, we multiply each isotopes' relative abundance by its mass no and find the sum as follows:

We convert each percentage to decimal abundance:

Isotope 1 = 9.67% = 0.0967

Isotope 2 = 78.68% = 0.7868

Isotope 3 = 11.34% = 0.1134

Isotope 4 = 0.31% = 0.0031

(0.0967 × 38) + (0.7868 × 39) + (0.1134 × 40) + (0.0031 × 41)

3.6746 + 30.6852 + 4.536 + 0.1271

Average atomic mass = 39.02amu

Answer:

The magnetic field of an atom, say H (one electron revolving around a proton) is composed of two separate contributions: an orbital magnetic moment and a spin magnetic moment. We get magnetic moments because of electromagnetic induction associated with each type of electron motion. The electron revolving around the proton with a certain angular momentum is related to the associated orbital magnetic moment (and, yes, we model it as a wire loop with current expressed in terms of the orbital velocity). This can be calculated using elementary mechanics. The spin magnetic moment is a little trickier because it is caused by the intrinsic spin of the electron which is a quantum phenomenon; therefore, this spin magnetic moment can only be calculated using quantum mechanics. In the end, we get a certain net magnetic moment associated with this motion of the electron in an atom. It is important to notice that this atom acts as a magnetic dipole (remember, as of yet, magnetic monopoles don't exist!).

If we take a bulk magnet like you might have on your fridge, it would be composed of atoms. Each atom operates as a magnetic dipole, but due to internal atomic structures, the atoms actually align themselves into separate magnetic domains, each with a net magnetic moment (caused my individually adding up those atomic dipole moments). In a common magnet (ferromagnet), these domains all point the same direction and stay that way, creating a permanent bulk magnetic dipole.

So in a way, there is no difference between the magnetic field of an atom and that of a magnet because one is simply a sum of the other, making both magnetic dipoles. Of course, here we see that there's nothing that fundamental about the magnetic force. In reality, the magnetic force is a relativistic effect caused by the movement of a charged particle, making electricity (i.e. charge) the underlying property at work here. Electromagnetic induction is really a shortcut to understand the magnetic force without worrying about relativistic mechanics. If we were to discover magnetic monopoles (i.e. "magnetic" charge), this would re-write a lot that we know about electromagnetism because we couldn't label all magnetic forces as by-products of moving electric charge

Answer: The correct option is C ( is very hard and burns cleanly).

Explanation:

COAL is a form of rock that is made up of mostly carbon amongst other elements which includes sulphur, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen. There are different types of coal which include:

--> anthracite ( 90% carbon)

--> bituminous coal ( 70-90% carbon)

--> lignite ( 60- 70% carbon) and

--> peat (60 % carbon).

Anthracite is the type of coal that contains the highest carbon content ( 90% carbon). This makes it very hard and is often a times referred to as HARD COAL. Anthracite is a higher quality coal for domestic and open fire heating. This is because it contains less impurities than other type of coal and thereby making it to BURN CLEANLY avoiding atmospheric pollution.

Answer: A hygroscopic substance is one that readily attracts water from its surroundings, through either absorption or adsorption

Explanation:

Answer:

thnx for the points too muchee

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

[tex]{hope it helps}}[/tex]

When the hematite particles rearrange to form a new substance", this statement describes chemical change.

A chemical change is a change of materials into another, new materials with different properties and one or more than one new substances are formed.

As a chemical changes is usually a change where a substance undergoes a chemical change and forms a new substance; which cannot be easily reversed into reactants by any simple physical methods.

In this example the hematite ore forms a new substance by an irreversible chemical change.

Hence, "The hematite particles rearrange to form a new substance", this statement describes chemical change.

Learn more about chemcial change here ;

https://brainly.com/question/23693316

#SPJ1

Answer:

Isotope 2

Explanation:

Isotope 2 is the most abundant. Its percent abundance is 78.68% which is the largest percentage, and therefore the most common of the isotopes presented.

Good luck!

Answer:

Answer to the following question is as follows.

Explanation:

Acid rain causes harm to houses and buildings by dissolving stone or corroding metal exposed to the elements. Acid rain can degrade calcium carbonate or calcium-based chemicals found in some of these products.

The acidic particles damage metal and accelerate the deterioration of paint and stone. They also make buildings and other structures, like as monuments, filthy.

Answer:

agua

Explanation:

por que estamos en la planeta

Answer:

Explanation:

Overuse of antibiotics leads to bacteria's resistance against our drugs. This is increasing at an alarming rate and the reason is that overuse of antibiotics kills bacteria that lack the "resistance" gene or gene that can help them survive the antibiotics (similar is the case for insects that die to insecticides). But, some bacteria can have random mutations in their gene that can help them survive the antibiotic (similar is the case for some insects that can survive the insecticide), thus the surviving bacteria give rise to next generation of bacteria that are resistant to the given antibiotic (similar to how insects that survive the insecticide give birth to new insects that are resistant to insecticide too). Soon, every generation adds new antibiotic resistant bacteria (or new insecticide resistant insects in the case of insects) which is dangerous for all of life on this planet. Therefore, both are similar in the sense that new generations of these organisms will be resistant to our weapons against them.

Answer:

Cr(NO3)3 (aq) +K3PO4 (s)

Explanation:

Both have Giant Covalent Structures, resulting in very high melting temperatures. However each carbon atom in Diamond has 4 covalent bonds with other Carbons, making it extremely strong and hard. On the other hand, each carbon in graphite is bonded to three carbons, and therefore graphite is formed in layers.

19. place moth balls in the closet and observe after several days.

20. whenever wax or a candle burns it turns from solid to liquid but again at room temperature it turns to solid

21. evaporation, condensation, precipitation

22. it produces new substances

23. vinegar Bubbles when baking soda is added

24. steam

Answer:

b is your answer...........

Answer:

Answer:

179.5 feet

Explanation:

54.718 m converted to 179.5 feet.

Answer: 1.80

Explanation:

Answer:its B

Explanation:

i have done this before! and i got 100 so i hope you got all the other questions right!

The table shows four reactions. The reaction That is an example of combustion of an organic substance is C₂H₄ + H₂ → C₂H₆. The correct option is b) 2.

Combustion reactions are those reactions in which the reactant reacts with oxygen and produces heat and light. An example is the burning of wood, it happens in the presence of oxygen.

Organic compounds are those compounds that are made by carbons. They are made by carbon-carbon or carbon-hydrogen bonds. They are naturally present in nature.

C₂H₄ + H₂ → C₂H₆

The equation above shows the reaction between methane and hydrogen, which is forming ethane in the presence of oxygen.

Thus, the correct option is b) 2. C₂H₄ + H₂ → C₂H₆.

To learn more about combustion reactions, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/12172040

#SPJ5

Answer:

His total displacement is 80 m northwards

Explanation:

Given;

Mike's first displacement, x₁ = 100 m North

Mike's second displacement, x₂ = 30 m South

Mike's third displacement, x₃ = 10 m North

Let his Northwards direction be positive, and

his Southwards direction be negative

His total displacement = (100 m North) + ( - 30 m South) + (10 m north)

                                     = (100 m + 10m - 30 m)

                                     = 80 m  Northwards

m=y2 −y1/x2-x1

Explanation:

3-5/2-12=1/5