Why was Korean War called a police action?
Answer:
The Korean War was called a police action because to get around the necessity of asking Congress to declare war, President Truman called it a “police action.”
any considerable offense offered might seriously endanger the fidelity of the native troops, but how?
Native troops are usually loyal to their superiors, however, any considerable offense offered might seriously endanger their fidelity. Native troops, in many cases, have loyalty to their own leaders and their own culture.
If their leaders or culture is insulted or wronged in any way, the native troops may become disillusioned with their superiors. This can lead to decreased morale, a lack of motivation and loyalty, and, in extreme cases, a mutiny or a rebellion.
Therefore, it is important for superiors to be aware of the potential consequences of any offense they may give to their native troops and to take measures to ensure that they maintain their loyalty.
know more about Native troops here
https://brainly.com/question/2978218#
#SPJ11
how does the fifth amendment apply to fundamental rights?
The fifth amendment applies to the fundamental rights of the American citizens, as it provides them protection against self-incrimination.
The fifth amendment of the American National Constitution has been an important inclusion into the law. This is primarily because of the fact that the fifth amendment provides protection to the citizens against double jeopardy. In addition to this, the amendment also tends to provide protection against self-incrimination, which is an individual's fundamental right.
Learn more about fifth amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30391361
#SPJ4
The provision above overturned the. answer choices. Alien and Sedition Acts. Chinese Exclusion Act. Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
The provision above overturned the Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Dred Scott v. Sandford was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1857 that ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be considered citizens and therefore had no right to sue in federal court. The provision referred to in the question overturned this decision, granting citizenship and constitutional protections to African Americans. The provision above overturned the Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford. This was a significant step towards ending the institutionalized oppression and discrimination faced by Black people in the United States and laid the groundwork for further civil rights advancements in the years to come.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Given how police are currently viewed in some minority communities , would this deter you from becoming a Law Enforcement Officer ? Why or why not
Answer:
No, because it would make me want to become an officer more so that i could y to make a change in the way people view officers.
Explanation:
what impact did brown v. board of education have on public policy in the united states?
The impact of the case of Brown v. Board of Education was such that the schools, which were a part of the public policy, had to be integrated, and their segregation became illegal after the ruling was made against the favor of the latter.
The public policies regarding the education and schooling system of the United States were heavily impacted following the rulings made under the Brown v. Board of Education. The impact was high to such an extent that the segregation laws became illegal and out of the scope of the schooling system of the United States of America.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education here:
https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ4
what psychological prisons do we create for ourselves and others
Psychological prisons are the ways we create for ourselves and others. They're the traps we fall into because of our own fears, insecurities, and shortcomings that make us feel like we're trapped. It's not a bad thing—it's just a fact of life.
If someone is having trouble with something at school, they might feel like they can't talk to anyone about it. When you don't feel comfortable talking about your problems, then you'll end up being more likely to make them worse.
If someone is having trouble with their parents or other family members, they might feel like they have no one who will listen to them or help them when they need it. So when their problems don't get solved quickly enough, they'll start feeling frustrated or annoyed instead of sympathetic towards them.
If someone has felt hurt by someone else in the past and now wants revenge against that person for what happened, then he or she will probably keep thinking about it over and over again until finally deciding that revenge is the best option.
That's just human nature—we get angry when something bad happens to us or around us
To know more about psychological prisons refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28423817#
#SPJ11
Congress can impeach and convict the president for high crimes, like treason or bribery. (T/F)
The statement is true. Congress can impeach and convict the president for high crimes, like treason or bribery.
What is a treason?Treason is the crime of betraying one's nation or government by acting against its interests, such as by supporting an adversary, seeking to topple the government, or assassinating the sovereign. In most nations, it is described as a betrayal of allegiance to the country and its sovereign and is one of the most severe transgressions. Treason is usually punished harshly, with jail time, fines, or even the death penalty being common options. Treason is a special kind of crime since it violates a citizen's obligation to be loyal and true to their nation by being committed against the state rather than against a particular person or organization.
To learn more about treason visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/934001
#SPJ4
what law requires logging companies to replant trees to replace what was harvested?
The federal forest law requires logging companies to replant trees to replace what was harvested.
Reforestation is required as part of the federal forest law. The replanting must be done in a way that preserves the genetic diversity of the trees. The Federal Forest Act is the law of the United States that regulates forest resources. The law was passed in 1916 and amended in 1934.
The law applies to both public and private forest land. The federal forest law requires forest companies to replant trees to replace what has been harvested. This right is important because it helps preserve natural forest resources and protect the environment.
To know more about Reforestation:
brainly.com/question/26388922
#SPJ4
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
It is completely inappropriate to mention that the statement given above regarding the significance of a Florida state trial court. Thus, the statement is false.
The decision made by a trial court is never taken in influence of the decision given by a prior court. However, they can definitely consider the decision of the prior court to decide on what grounds such decision was made. A state's trial court can never be under any sort of obligation to follow the decisions that were made by the earlier courts.
Learn more about trial courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
Complete question
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
TRUE OR FALSE
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
It is completely inappropriate to mention that the statement given above regarding the significance of state trial court. Thus, the statement is false.
The decision that is given by a state's trial court is never taken in the primary influence of the decision given by an earlier court. However, they can definitely consider the decision of the prior court to decide on what basis and grounds such decision was taken, and the verdict was made. A state's trial court can never be under any sort of obligation to follow the decisions that were made by the prior courts.
Learn more about trial courts, here:
brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
Complete question
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
TRUE OR FALSE
lawsuits involving imaging professionals are brought only under civil tort law. question 4 options: true false
Lawsuits involving imaging professionals are brought only under civil tort law, it is false.
Lawsuits can also involve administrative and criminal law. Administrative law governs the licensure of the imaging professional. Imaging professional should immediately consult with supervisor or the legal department if served with interrogatories regarding any legal action.
Learn more about Lawsuits here
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SP J4
trait theories suggest that certain biological or psychological traits can trigger criminal behavior in certain circumstances.
It's true that some biological or psychological qualities may, under specific conditions, lead to criminal behavior, according to trait theories.
According to the criminology theory known as the individual trait, several personality features increase a person's likelihood of committing a crime. Both nurture and nature, or environmental and biological variables, have an impact on personality traits. In order to distinguish between genetic and social influences, biological hypotheses have focused on chromosome variants, twin studies, and body shape. There is evidence in the literature that criminal behavior is passed down through families in a hereditary way. The person is a central theme in psychological theories. The core tenet of biological theories concerning the origins of crime is that the physical body, through inherited genes, evolutionary factors, brain architecture, or the function of hormones, influences a person's involvement in criminal behavior.
Learn more about criminal behavior from here:
https://brainly.com/question/29847140
#SPJ4
a central concern of many political, religious, and social leaders today is income
a central concern of many political, religious, and social leaders today is income inequality.
The occurrence of an unfair and/or unequal distribution of opportunities and resources among the people that make up a society is referred to as inequality. To various users and in various settings, the word "inequality" may indicate different things.
Technology advancement, globalization, commodity price fluctuations, and domestic fiscal policies such redistributive fiscal policies, labour and product market policies are some of the major causes of the rise in intra-country income inequality documented in the literature.
Income is simply one element that influences and measures inequality; other ones include gender, age, provenance, ethnicity, handicap, sexual preference, class, and religion. These elements determine the persistent disparities in opportunity both within and between nations.
Learn more about inequality here:
https://brainly.com/question/14999205
#SJ4
Some states in the u.s. have both medical examiners and coroner systems, not just one of the other.a. Trueb. False
Answer:
True :)
Explanation:
have great day
In what scenario do you need to comply with 21 CFR Part 11 when planning a study for FDA submission?
It describes how to handle electronic records in the quality management system of a medical device company and offers advice on best practises for the sector.
What does a compliance statement under 21 CFR Part 11 mean?The agency shall consider electronic records that meet the requirements of Part 11 of CFR 21 to be "trustworthy, dependable, and generally equivalent to paper records," according to Section 11.1(a) of that section.
What exactly are the demands of FDA Part 11?Part 11 demands that you use "secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails to independently record the date and time of operator entries and actions that create, alter, or delete electronic documents" to provide a comprehensive version history for every quality document in your system.
To know more about 21 CFR Part 11 visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30332987
#SPJ4
Why were the fiber and hair evidence irrelevant without a suspect?
Fiber and hair evidence can be considered irrelevant without a suspect because they lack a point of comparison. The purpose of collecting such evidence is to compare it to the clothing or hair of a suspect to determine if there is a match. If there is no suspect, the evidence is of limited value.
What is the hair evidence about?For example, if fibers or hairs are found at a crime scene, but there is no suspect, the evidence cannot be used to implicate anyone. It can be used to eliminate someone as a suspect if they can be excluded as the source of the fibers or hairs, but it cannot be used to positively identify a suspect.
In order to make the fiber and hair evidence relevant, it must be linked to a suspect through the process of comparison. This can be done through laboratory analysis, such as microscopic examination or DNA analysis, which can determine if the fibers or hairs match those found on a suspect's clothing or hair.
Learn more about hair evidence from
https://brainly.com/question/26336479
#SPJ1
The reason why the fiber and hair evidence irrelevant without a suspect: was; because it cannot be linked to a specific individual without a suspect to compare it to.
What was Fiber and hair evidence?Fiber and hair evidence can be considered irrelevant without a suspect because it cannot be linked to a specific individual without a suspect to compare it to.
In order to determine whether fibers or hairs found at a crime scene match those of a suspect, they must be compared to a sample taken from the suspect.
Based on this fiber and hair evidence is often considered circumstantial evidence, and is most useful when it is combined with other types of evidence, such as DNA analysis, to build a stronger case.
Therefore fiber and hair evidence irrelevant without a suspect was; because it cannot be linked to a specific individual without a suspect to compare it to.
Learn more about fiber and hair evidence here:https://brainly.com/question/29442701
#SPJ1
What is the amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishment and prohibits excessive bail and fines.
amendment 8.2.2 Modern Doctrine on Bail and amendment 8.3 Excessive Fines is the amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishment and prohibits excessive bail and fines.
On December 15, 1791, the Constitution's Amendment Eight was approved. It prohibits the use of excessive bail amounts, penalties, and "cruel and unusual" punishments during criminal proceedings. The text's original format reads as follows:
No disproportionate fines, excessive bail requirements, or harsh or unusual penalties are permitted.
The first two sections of the Amendment are well recognized, but the definition of "cruel and unusual punishments" has generated much debate. A citizen has historically been shielded from such penalties since the English Bill of Rights, which forbade their application, in 1689.
To know more about excessive bail:
https://brainly.com/question/29549459
#SPJ4
generally, after a judgment is rendered at trial, the appeals court tries a case anew and hears new evidence. true or false
It is totally inappropriate to be mentioning that after a judgment being rendered at trial, the appeals courts try the case afresh and hear new evidences. Thus, the given statement is completely false.
A trial for a case is binding upon the given decision, and thus the decision is acceptable at the end of both the parties. Although the parties have an option to make an appeal in a higher court, the decision given by the arbitrator are final and legal binding upon the parties related to the case thereto.
Learn more about a trial here:
https://brainly.com/question/28546013
#SPJ4
What authority does the federal government have under the Commerce Clause? Choose 2 answer choices.
To regulate international commerce and To regulate commerce on the national and local levels the federal government have under the Commerce Clause.
The U.S. Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 is referred to as the "Commerce Clause" and grants Congress the authority "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several states, and with the Indian tribes."
Congress has frequently cited the Commerce Clause as justification for exercising legislative authority over the decisions made by states and their citizens, igniting a heated and ongoing controversy regarding the division of power between the federal government and the states. The Commerce Clause has long been viewed as a restriction on the ability of the States to self-regulate as well as a grant of power to Congress.
To know more about Commerce Clause:
https://brainly.com/question/15224763
#SPJ4
when a new country gains independence, what responsibilities do you think it has to its citizens?
Providing lawful protection, drafting of a constitution, social security, and welfare are among some responsibilities that a country has towards its citizens after gaining independence.
The independence is to be usually considered as an aspect wherein the governance of a country is in its own hands after getting freedom from the rule by foreign colonists, as such. For example, a country like India gained independence from the British colonists in 1947, and since then the Indian constitution and establishment of a central government has been relevant in the Indian society.
Learn more about independence here:
https://brainly.com/question/3897169
#SPJ4
According to the conflict perspective, which system emerges after class conflict?
Capitalism
Socialism
Social welfarism
None of the abov
Socialism is the conflict perspective, which system emerges after class conflict.
Any criticism of socialist models of economic organization, their viability, as well as the political and social repercussions of implementing such a system, is referred to as socialism criticism (also known as anti-socialism). Some criticisms focus on the socialist movement, political parties, or existing states rather than socialism as a whole. Some detractors of socialism believe it to be a purely theoretical idea that should be criticized on theoretical grounds (as in the case of the socialist calculation debate and the economic calculation problem), while others believe that there are historical examples that can be criticized on practical grounds.
To know more about Socialism:
https://brainly.com/question/932756
#SPJ4
what court does article iii, section 1 of the constitution specifically name?
The article III and section 1 of the American Constitution specifically names the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court can be specifically regarded as the most superior judicial authority under the functioning of the national constitution of the United States of America. The articles of the constitution have named the authorities and functioning of the Supreme Court. To be specific, the section 1 has mentioned the scope of the Supreme Court along with the powers that it holds in the nation's judicial system.
Learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
the federal bureaucracy performs three primary tasks in government: implementation, administration, and regulation. T/F
The three primary roles of the federal bureaucracy are implementation, administration, and regulation.
What exactly does government red tape involve?
The Executive Branch is supervised by the Federal Bureaucracy, a non-elected administrative body. It functions as the US government's skeleton. Departments, agencies, and commissions are how it is set up.
Bureaucracy is what we define. an administrative body that doesn't have elections but is tasked with carrying out directives from other governmental branches. the steadfast, capable public sector management. The roughly 2,000 federal departments, agencies, and commissions are all bureaucracies. The Social Security Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Veterans Benefits Administration are the three most well-known of these organizations. A bureaucracy is an intricately structured organization with many tiers of systems and processes.
To know more about federal bureaucracy visit:
brainly.com/question/29620982
#SPJ4
Psych Questions
1.Explain Baddeley’s model of Working Memory. How is this model different from the three-box model’s original conceptualization of short-term memory?
2. Describe how classical conditioning works. What type of behaviour is learned by way of classical conditioning? Use an example to illustrate your answer.
3. Describe how operational conditioning works. What type of behaviour is learned by way of operational conditioning? Use an example to illustrate your answer.
4. What does a measure of central tendency tell us about a set of numbers? Identify and explain each of the measures of central tendency. Under what circumstance is each used and why?
5. Explain the following expressions as they apply to neurons and neuronal communication: “lock & key”; “all-or-none”; “information flows downstream”. Define agonist and antagonist as they apply to neuronal communication and provide a detailed explanation of two examples each. Explain the difference between “Localization of Function” and “Lateralization” and provide one example of each.
In neurons and neuronal communication, the “lock & key” expression refers to the specific way in which neurotransmitters bind to receptors on target cells, allowing the flow of electrical signals.
The “all-or-none” expression refers to the fact that neurons either fire completely or not at all, meaning they either reach their threshold potential or they don't.
For example, morphine is an agonist for the neurotransmitter endorphin, and naloxone is an antagonist for endorphins.
"Localization of function" refers to the idea that different parts of the brain have specialized functions, such as language processing in the frontal lobe or vision in the occipital lobe.
"Lateralization" refers to the division of function between the left and right hemispheres of the brain, with the left hemisphere often being specialized for language and the right for spatial perception and creativity.
Learn more on neurons here https://brainly.com/question/13061744
#SPJ1
why is ohio holding a state wide vote on the issue of legalization of marijuana?
Answer:
Medicine
Explanation:
They are saying that it can be used as medicine, but to be able to use it as medicine, they have to make it legal.
if you driver license is revoked, you will be required to take and pass all driver examinations. True or False
This statement is true: if you driver license is revoked, you will be required to take and pass all driver examinations.
A driver's license can be suspended for a number of different reasons. If you are found guilty of a specific offense, your driver's license might be automatically suspended. In essence, having your driver's license revoked implies that you are no longer permitted to operate a motor vehicle on any road at any time.
Restoration of a Suspended Driving License
Both the suspension and revocation of a driver's license have separate reinstatement procedures. California does not allow the restoration of suspended licenses. Drivers may, however, apply for a brand-new license after the revocation term has ended.
To know more about driver license:
https://brainly.com/question/458346
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. the supreme court has no role in constitutional revision.
Answer:
the answer would be false the supreme court has key role in constitutional revision
False; there are several ways to change the constitution. By using its judicial review authority to interpret the Constitution as it considers cases, the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in constitutional revision.
The highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States is known as the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). It has final appellate authority over all cases heard in U.S. federal courts as well as state court disputes involving issues of federal or constitutional law. A small subset of matters, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party," are also under its original jurisdiction. The court has the authority to invalidate a statute for disobeying a constitutional provision through judicial review. Additionally, it has the authority to invalidate presidential orders that contravene either the Constitution or statutory law.
To know more about the supreme court, click here https://brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4
What are some search exceptions?
Search Incident to Lawful Arrest, Items in Plain View, Consent, Stop-and-Frisk, Other Exceptions, The Exclusionary Rule are some search exceptions.
What is exceptions?The practise of reacting to the occurrence of exceptions—anomalous or extraordinary events requiring special processing—during the execution of a programme is known as exception handling in computing and computer programming. The specifics of how this is done vary depending on whether it is a hardware or software exception and how the software exception is implemented. In general, an exception interrupts the usual flow of execution and executes a pre-registered exception handler. If offered, exception handling is made easier by specialised programming language constructs, hardware features like interrupts, or IPC features like signals supplied by operating systems (OS). Some exceptions, particularly those related to hardware, may be handled so smoothly that execution can pick up where it left off.
To know more about exceptions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29781445
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. the u.s. supreme court has defined legal force a force that is objectively reasonable.
The statement is true that the U.S. supreme court has defined legal force a force that is objectively reasonable.
In the federal judiciary of the United States, the Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court. It has final appellate authority over all cases heard in U.S. federal courts as well as state court disputes involving issues of federal or constitutional law.
Legal force is defined by the U.S. Supreme Court as force that is objectively acceptable. As long as they mention that the informant has a solid background and that disclosing the informant's identity would be risky, police are not obligated to reveal the name of the informant on affidavits for search warrants.
To learn more about Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4