Which drawing is structural model of C3H8?

Answer:

a group of electrochemical cells that can be recharged

Answer:

Explanation:The equation for this is F = -GmM/R^2 where the minus sign says the force is attractive m is 10 kg, M is 20 kg and R is 5 meters. If you crunch the numbers you get an answer of:

Answer:

The chloroplasts form a spiral around the vacuole and have specialized bodies known as pyrenoids that store starch. The cell wall consists of an inner layer of cellulose and an outer layer of pectin, which is responsible for the slippery texture of the algae.

Explanation:

hope it is helpful to you

Answer:

6.40 is the answer to your question

The number of moles of oxygen in 1.60 moles of sodium hydrogen phosphate is 6.4 moles

Let's represent the chemical formula of the compound. The chemical formula of sodium hydrogen phosphate is as follows:

The chemical formula of a compound is a symbolic expression use to signify the number of atoms present in a molecular substance. Therefore,

sodium hydrogen phosphate  = Na₃PO₄

Therefore,

1 mole of Na₃PO₄ = 4 moles of oxygen

1.60 moles of Na₃PO₄  = ? moles of oxygen

cross multiply

number of moles of oxygen = 1.60 × 4

number of moles of oxygen = 6.4 moles

learn more on moles here: https://brainly.com/question/18395277

Answer:

39.02amu

Explanation:

According to this question, there are four (4) isotopes for element X with the following relative abundance:

Isotope 1 = 9.67%, mass no: 38

Isotope 2 = 78.68%, mass no: 39

Isotope 3 = 11.34%, mass no: 40

Isotope 4 = 0.31%, mass no: 41

To find the average atomic mass of element X, we multiply each isotopes' relative abundance by its mass no and find the sum as follows:

We convert each percentage to decimal abundance:

Isotope 1 = 9.67% = 0.0967

Isotope 2 = 78.68% = 0.7868

Isotope 3 = 11.34% = 0.1134

Isotope 4 = 0.31% = 0.0031

(0.0967 × 38) + (0.7868 × 39) + (0.1134 × 40) + (0.0031 × 41)

3.6746 + 30.6852 + 4.536 + 0.1271

Average atomic mass = 39.02amu

Answer:

valence

Explanation:

the level of energy electrons have within a general shape the energy level is valence.

Answer: 4.93

Explanation:

Answer:

His total displacement is 80 m northwards

Explanation:

Given;

Mike's first displacement, x₁ = 100 m North

Mike's second displacement, x₂ = 30 m South

Mike's third displacement, x₃ = 10 m North

Let his Northwards direction be positive, and

his Southwards direction be negative

His total displacement = (100 m North) + ( - 30 m South) + (10 m north)

                                     = (100 m + 10m - 30 m)

                                     = 80 m  Northwards

19. place moth balls in the closet and observe after several days.

20. whenever wax or a candle burns it turns from solid to liquid but again at room temperature it turns to solid

21. evaporation, condensation, precipitation

22. it produces new substances

23. vinegar Bubbles when baking soda is added

24. steam

Answer:

I don't know I don't know about question but I can try to find it

Explanation:

I don't know about question but I can try to find it

Fluorine (F) and iodine(I) are the halogen elements that belong to group 17. They differ from each other as fluorine has 3 fewer energy shells than iodine. Thus, option D is correct.

Halogen is a nonmetallic element that belongs to group 17 and consists of six elements namely fluorine, bromine, tennessine, chlorine, astatine, and iodine.

They are diatomic and have 7 valence electrons in the outer shell, which makes them highly reactive and electronegative. The shielding effect is less in F than I due to the closer placement and attraction of the valence electron to the nucleus.

Fluorine differs from iodine as it has a smaller size with fewer energy shells than iodine. Iodine has five energy shells,  whereas fluorine has two energy shells that make the difference of three shells between them.

Therefore, F and I differ from each other.

Learn more about fluorine and iodine here:

https://brainly.com/question/2005537

#SPJ5

Answer:

8.87 × 10³ moles.

Explanation:

To convert number of molecules of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) to moles (n), we divide by Avogadro's number (6.02 × 10²³)

That is; n = N ÷ nA

According to the question, 5.34 x 10^27 molecules of SF6 was given in this question. Hence, the number of moles it contains is given as:

n = 5.34 x 10^27 ÷ 6.02 × 10²³

n = 5.34/6.02 × 10^ (27-23)

n = 0.887 × 10⁴

n = 8.87 × 10³ moles.

Answer:

Todas son correctas

Explanation:

I) Los compuestos del carbono son solubles en disolventes no polares como el hexano, benceno, éter, etc. VERDADERO. La mayoría de los compuestos de carbono son apolares, y basados en la regla: Similar disuelve similar, podemos presumir que la mayoría de compuestos de carbono se disuelven en solventes no polares.

II) Los compuestos del carbono generalmente presentan puntos de fusión y de ebullición bajos. VERDADERO. Al ser sustancias apolares, sus fuerzas electrostáticas son bajas. De la misma manera, como su masa atómica es pequeña, las fuerzas de Van der Waals son despreciables haciendo que sus puntos de fusión y ebullición sean bajos respecto a sustancias de estrucutra similar.

III) La gran mayoría de los compuestos del carbono son combustibles, sean estos, gaseosos, líquidos o sólidos. VERDADERO. Los gases (Como el gas natural) son combustibles usados para cocina. Los líquidos (Como la gasolina) son combustibles y bastante inflamables. Los sólidos (Como la madera) se usan como combustibles para hacer asados o son el combustible en incendios forestales.

IV) El enlace covalente es característico de los compuestos del carbono. VERDADERO. La polaridad del carbono es neutral haciendo que la mayoría de los enlaces que forma sean covalentes.

Answer:

thnx for the points too muchee

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

[tex]{hope it helps}}[/tex]

When the hematite particles rearrange to form a new substance", this statement describes chemical change.

A chemical change is a change of materials into another, new materials with different properties and one or more than one new substances are formed.

As a chemical changes is usually a change where a substance undergoes a chemical change and forms a new substance; which cannot be easily reversed into reactants by any simple physical methods.

In this example the hematite ore forms a new substance by an irreversible chemical change.

Hence, "The hematite particles rearrange to form a new substance", this statement describes chemical change.

Learn more about chemcial change here ;

https://brainly.com/question/23693316

#SPJ1

Answer:

0.302M

Explanation:

Molarity, which is the molar concentration of a solution can be calculated as follows:

Molarity = number of moles (n) ÷ volume (V)

According to this question, 19.5 grams of Be(OH)2 is dissolved in enough water to make a 1.5 L solution.

Using mole = mass/molar mass to calculate the number of moles in 19.5g of Be(OH)2

Molar mass of Be(OH)2 = 9 + (16 + 1)2

= 9 + (17)2

= 9 + 34

= 43g/mol

mole = 19.5/43

mole = 0.453moles

Molarity = n/V

Molarity = 0.453/1.5

Molarity = 0.302M

Answer:

The balanced equation would be:

3AgNO3+Al→3Ag+Al(NO3)3

Explanation:

Answer:

C.faste-moving lava flows and explosion of cinder

Answer:

Thus, the element containing the greatest number of atoms is 12 g He. Thus, the correct option is (4) 12 g He. Note: The number of atoms of a compound is Avogadro's number for 1 mole of compound. The number 6.022×1023 is known as Avogadro's number.

Explanation:

(4)✔️ 12 g He

please follow me.

Answer:

120gram I think so this is the answer if the answer is correct plz mark me as brainliest.

Answer:

Cr(NO3)3 (aq) +K3PO4 (s)

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Overuse of antibiotics leads to bacteria's resistance against our drugs. This is increasing at an alarming rate and the reason is that overuse of antibiotics kills bacteria that lack the "resistance" gene or gene that can help them survive the antibiotics (similar is the case for insects that die to insecticides). But, some bacteria can have random mutations in their gene that can help them survive the antibiotic (similar is the case for some insects that can survive the insecticide), thus the surviving bacteria give rise to next generation of bacteria that are resistant to the given antibiotic (similar to how insects that survive the insecticide give birth to new insects that are resistant to insecticide too). Soon, every generation adds new antibiotic resistant bacteria (or new insecticide resistant insects in the case of insects) which is dangerous for all of life on this planet. Therefore, both are similar in the sense that new generations of these organisms will be resistant to our weapons against them.

Answer:

2Na + 2H2O → 2NaOH + H2

Explanation:

This is the balanced equation of,

Sodium + water → sodium hydroxide + hydrogen

Answer:

NO. 10.

performed experiments

NO. 11.

Inference

Explanation:

No 10.

in order to prove that Mary Mellon was in fact infected by typhoid proper experiments needs to be carried out.

No. 11

inference means an assumption due to the situation.

Answer:

Unicellular organisms consist of only one cell and multicellular organisms consist of many cell.

Explanation:

Living things made up of a cell are called unicellular beings. They are very small and simple. In other words, unicellular organisms are those that are formed only by a single cell in which all the vital functions necessary for life are produced. For this reason, they are mostly microscopic organisms. Examples of unicellular organisms are viruses or bacteria.

Multicellular organisms are made up of a large number of cells. They present, therefore, a greater complexity than unicellular organisms in terms of the functions they develop. All current multicellular organisms come from a single cell, that is, they begin their life being unicellular. That is, they are formed from a zygote. Some examples of multicellular organisms are mammals, fungi, and mosses.

So, unicellular organisms consist of only one cell and multicellular organisms consist of many cell.

Answer:

The magnetic field of an atom, say H (one electron revolving around a proton) is composed of two separate contributions: an orbital magnetic moment and a spin magnetic moment. We get magnetic moments because of electromagnetic induction associated with each type of electron motion. The electron revolving around the proton with a certain angular momentum is related to the associated orbital magnetic moment (and, yes, we model it as a wire loop with current expressed in terms of the orbital velocity). This can be calculated using elementary mechanics. The spin magnetic moment is a little trickier because it is caused by the intrinsic spin of the electron which is a quantum phenomenon; therefore, this spin magnetic moment can only be calculated using quantum mechanics. In the end, we get a certain net magnetic moment associated with this motion of the electron in an atom. It is important to notice that this atom acts as a magnetic dipole (remember, as of yet, magnetic monopoles don't exist!).

If we take a bulk magnet like you might have on your fridge, it would be composed of atoms. Each atom operates as a magnetic dipole, but due to internal atomic structures, the atoms actually align themselves into separate magnetic domains, each with a net magnetic moment (caused my individually adding up those atomic dipole moments). In a common magnet (ferromagnet), these domains all point the same direction and stay that way, creating a permanent bulk magnetic dipole.

So in a way, there is no difference between the magnetic field of an atom and that of a magnet because one is simply a sum of the other, making both magnetic dipoles. Of course, here we see that there's nothing that fundamental about the magnetic force. In reality, the magnetic force is a relativistic effect caused by the movement of a charged particle, making electricity (i.e. charge) the underlying property at work here. Electromagnetic induction is really a shortcut to understand the magnetic force without worrying about relativistic mechanics. If we were to discover magnetic monopoles (i.e. "magnetic" charge), this would re-write a lot that we know about electromagnetism because we couldn't label all magnetic forces as by-products of moving electric charge