The histogram below shows the distribution of the assets (in millions of dollars) of 71 companies. Does the distribution appear to be normal? Why or why not?

No, the assets do not appear to follow a normal distribution, the values are evenly concentrated.
Yes, the assets appear to follow a normal distribution, the values are evenly distributed. No, the assets do not appear to follow a normal distribution, the values are concentrated in the center and taper off towards the ends.
Yes, the assets appear to follow a normal distribution, the values are concentrated in the center and taper off towards the ends.

Answer:

B. 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall: according to thee Mid-segment Theorem of a triangle, the Mid-segment of a triangle is half the length of the base of the triangle

Base length of the traingle, RQ = 14 (given)

Mid-segment = TS

Therefore,

TS = ½(RQ)

Plug in the value

TS = ½(14)

TS = 7

Answer:

5 905 272

Step-by-step explanation:

you can refer to this lattice multiplication or u can search you tube for the examples of lattice multiplication

Answer:

The probability that the mean of the sample would differ from the population mean by less than 36 points=0.9216

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

The variance of the scores on a skill evaluation test=143,641

Mean=1517 points

n=343

We have to find the probability that the mean of the sample would differ from the population mean by less than 36 points.

Standard deviation,[tex]\sigma=\sqrt{143641}[/tex]

[tex]P(|x-\mu|<36)=P(|\frac{x-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}|<\frac{36}{\frac{\sqrt{143641}}{\sqrt{343}}})[/tex]

[tex]=P(|Z|<\frac{36}{\sqrt{\frac{143641}{343}}})[/tex]

[tex]=P(|Z|<1.76)[/tex]

[tex]=0.9216[/tex]

Hence,  the probability that the mean of the sample would differ from the population mean by less than 36 points=0.9216

Answer:

Part A

(1y^2+3y-6)+(4y-7+2y^2)+(3y^2-8+5y)

6y^2+12y-21

Answer:

49 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

RT=D

T = D/R

[tex]\frac{1995}{(350 + x) } =\frac{1505}{350-x}[/tex]

1995(350-x) = 1505(350+x)

x=49

Answer:

(x+5)(x-3) / (x+5)(x+1)

Step-by-step explanation:

A removeable discontinuity is always found in the denominator of a rational function and is one that can be reduced away with an identical term in the numerator.  It is still, however, a problem because it causes the denominator to equal 0 if filled in with the necessary value of x.  In my function above, the terms (x + 5) in the numerator and denominator can cancel each other out, leaving a hole in your graph at -5 since x doesn't exist at -5, but the x + 1 doesn't have anything to cancel out with, so this will present as a vertical asymptote in your graph at x = -1, a nonremoveable discontinuity.

Answer:

the number of flight lines needed is approximately 72

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Aerial photography is to be taken of a tract of land that is 8 x 8 mi²

L × B = 8 x 8 mi²

Flying height H = 4000 ft = ( 4000 × 12 )inches = 48000 in

focal length f = 6 in

[tex]l[/tex] × b = 9 × 9 in²

side overlap = 30% = 0.3

meaning remaining side overlap = 100% - 30% = 70% = 0.7

{ not end to end overlap }

we take 100% { remaining overlap }

[tex]l[/tex]' = 9 × 100% = 9 in

b' = 9 × 70% = 6.3 in

Now the scale will be;

Scale = f/H

we substitute

Scale = 6 in /  48000 in = 1 / 8000

so our scale is; 1 : 8000

⇒ 1 in = 8000 in

⇒ 1 in = (8000 / 63360)mi

⇒ 1 in = 0.126 mi

so since

L × B = 8 x 8 mi²

[tex]l[/tex]' = ( 9 × 0.126 mi ) = 1.134 mi

b' = ( 6.3 × 0.126 mi ) = 0.7938 mi

Now we get the flight lines;

N = ( L × B ) / ( [tex]l[/tex]' × b' )

we substitute

N = ( 8 mi × 8 mi ) / ( 1.134 mi × 0.7938 mi )

N = 64 / 0.9001692

N = 71.0977 ≈ 72

Therefore, the number of flight lines needed is approximately 72

Answer:

78.81%

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Population mean; μ = 149

Sample mean; x¯ = 147.8

Sample size; n = 88

standard deviation; σ = 14

Z-score is;

z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)

Plugging in the relevant values;

z = (147.8 - 149)/(14/√88)

z = -0.804

From z-distribution table attached, we have; p = 0.21186

P(X > 147.8) = 1 - 0.21186 = 0.78814

In percentage gives; p = 78.81%

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  you cannot use an equation to pick random numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

"Picked randomly" and "using an equation" are mutually exclusive. A random number cannot be predicted, so an equation cannot be used to generate it.

That being said, many programming languages make use of a "linear congruential generator" for generating random numbers. Such a generator generates a next number (x') from a previous number (x) using the equation ...

  x' = (a·x +c) mod m

Numbers generated in this way are called "pseudo-random numbers." The sequence of generated numbers will repeat at some point, and the statistics of generated numbers may or may not be suitable for any given application. (For example, sequential numbers may tend to be correlated.) The distribution of numbers is inherently uniform, so if you need other distribution, you need to perform some math on what you get from a linear congruential generator. Methods are available for approximating about any kind of distribution you might want.

This is not the only "equation" that can be used, and is certainly not the best.

__

A variety of different values of a, c, m are used in generators of this type. Some are better than others at producing what looks like randomness. Here's a set of numbers you can try: (no claim is made regarding suitability for your purpose)

This will produce numbers in the range 0–16777215. To get numbers in the range of 1-70, you can map these to your range in any suitable fashion. For example, you could add 1 to the integer part of the result from division by 239675.

Below is a graph of the sorted output of 200 values in the range 1–70 from the generator described here. You can see the distribution is approximately linear, and that some values are missing while others show up more often than average. (You expect this with random numbers.) The seed for these numbers (first value of x) is 1337457.

__

There is a web site available that will produce random numbers to your specification, based on the background noise of the universe. They are truly random.

Answer:

m(x) is a dilation of scale factor K = 1/5 of f(x).

Step-by-step explanation:

The transformation is a horizontal dilation

The general transformation is defined as:

For a given function f(x), a dilation of scale factor K is written as:

g(x) = f(x/K)

If K > 1, then we have a dilation (the graph contracts)

if 0 < K < 1, then we have a contraction (the graph stretches)

Here we have m(x) = f(5*x)

Then we have a scale factor:

K = 1/5

So this is a contraction.

Then the transformation is:

m(x) is a dilation of scale factor K = 1/5 of f(x).

Answer:

Slope = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the slope of the line, you need to plot two points

My own two points will be: [tex](1,2)[/tex] and [tex](2,4)[/tex]

Now use the Slope-Formula to identify the slope of the line

[tex]m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

[tex]m=\frac{4-2}{2-1}[/tex]

[tex]m=\frac{2}{1}[/tex]

[tex]m=2[/tex]

so the slope of the line in simplest form will be 2.

Answer:

a) y=f(x)-2

b) y=f(-x)

Answer:

80b-11

Step-by-step explanation:

14b + 1 - 6(2 - 11b)

Distribute

14b+1-12+66b

Combine like terms

80b-11

Answer:

80b - 11

Step-by-step explanation:

what is the problem ?

just multiply it out and combine terms.

14b + 1 - 6(2 - 11b) = 14b + 1 - 12 + 66b = 80b - 11

The question is incomplete. The complete question is :

The breaking strengths of cables produced by a certain manufacturer have a mean of 1900 pounds, and a standard deviation of 65 pounds. It is claimed that an improvement in the manufacturing process has increased the mean breaking strength. To evaluate this claim, 150 newly manufactured cables are randomly chosen and tested, and their mean breaking strength is found to be 1902 pounds. Assume that the population is normally distributed. Can we support, at the 0.01 level of significance, the claim that the mean breaking strength has increased?

Solution :

Given data :

Mean, μ = 1900

Standard deviation, σ = 65

Sample size, n = 150

Sample mean, [tex]$\overline x$[/tex] = 1902

Level of significance = 0.01

The hypothesis are :

[tex]$H_0 : \mu = 1900$[/tex]

[tex]$H_1 : \mu > 1900$[/tex]

Test statics :

We use the z test as the sample size is large and we know the population standard deviation.

[tex]$z=\frac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}}$[/tex]

[tex]$z=\frac{1902-1900}{65 / \sqrt{150}}$[/tex]

[tex]$z=\frac{2}{5.30723}$[/tex]

[tex]$z=0.38$[/tex]

Finding the p-value:

P-value = P(Z > z)

             = P(Z > 0.38)

             = 1 - P(Z < 0.38)

From the z table. we get

P(Z < 0.38) = 0.6480

Therefore,

P-value = 1 - P(Z < 0.38)

            = 1 - 0.6480

             = 0.3520

Decision :

If the p value is less than 0.01, then we reject the [tex]H_0[/tex], otherwise we fail to reject  [tex]H_0[/tex].

Since the value of p = 0.3520 > 0.01, the level of significance, then we fail to reject  [tex]H_0[/tex].

Conclusion :

At a significance level of 0.01, we have no sufficient evidence to support that the mean breaking strength has increased.

Answer:

(2k, k)

Step-by-step explanation:

x + y = 3k

x - y = k

Add the equations.

2x = 4k

x = 2k

2k + y = 3k

y = k

Answer: (2k, k)

Answer:

58.80

Step-by-step explanation:

84 x .7(70%) =58.80

Answer:

D. It will increase by 1%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]u_1 = 5\%[/tex] --- initial rate

[tex]u_2 = 3\%[/tex] --- final rate

Required

The effect on the GDP

To calculate this, we make use of:

[tex]\frac{\triangle Y}{Y} = u_1 - 2\triangle u[/tex]

This gives:

[tex]\frac{\triangle Y}{Y} = 5\% - 2(5\% - 3\%)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\triangle Y}{Y} = 5\% - 2(2\%)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\triangle Y}{Y} = 5\% - 4\%[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\triangle Y}{Y} = 1\%[/tex]

This implies that the GDP will increase by 1%

Answer: A. It will increase by 7%.

Step-by-step explanation: I took this course!

Answer:

Two lines that intersect and form right angles are called perpendicular lines.

Answer:

perpendicular lines

Step-by-step explanation:

Definition of perpendicular lines:

Two lines that intersect forming a right angle are perpendicular lines.

Answer: perpendicular lines

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]y=(x-7)^2-1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to convert the equation:

[tex]\displaystyle y=x^2-14x+48[/tex]

Into vertex form, given by:

[tex]\displaystyle y=a(x-h)^2+k[/tex]

Where a is the leading coefficient and (h, k) is the vertex.

There are two methods of doing this. We can either: (1) use the vertex formulas or (2) complete the square.

Method 1) Vertex Formulas

Let's use the vertex formulas. First, note that the leading coefficient a of our equation is 1.

Recall that the vertex is given by:

[tex]\displaystyle \text{Vertex}=\left(-\frac{b}{2a}, f\left(-\frac{b}{2a}\right)\right)[/tex]

In this case, a = 1, b = -14, and c = 48. Find the x-coordinate of the vertex:

[tex]\displaystyle x=-\frac{(-14)}{2(1)}=7[/tex]

To find the y-coordinate, substitute this value back into the equation. Hence:

[tex]y=(7)^2-14(7)+48=-1[/tex]

Therefore, our vertex (h, k) is (7, -1), where h = 7 and k = -1.

And since we already determined a = 1, our equation in vertex form is:

[tex]\displaystyle y=(x-7)^2-1[/tex]

Method 2) Completing the Square

We can also complete the square to acquire the vertex form. We have:

[tex]y=x^2-14x+48[/tex]

Factor out the leading coefficient from the first two terms. Since the leading coefficient is one in this case, we do not need to do anything significant:

[tex]y=(x^2-14x)+48[/tex]

Now, we half b and square it. The value of b in this case is -14. Half of -14 is -7 and its square is 49.

We will add this value inside the parentheses. Since we added 49 inside the parentheses, we will also subtract 49 outside to retain the equality of the equation. Hence:

[tex]y=(x^2-14x+49)+48-49[/tex]

Factor using the perfect square trinomial and simplify:

[tex]y=(x-7)^2-1[/tex]

We acquire the same solution as before, with the vertex being (7, -1).

C. The two statements agree in point of truth or falsehood in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are true or false in exactly the same conditions.

For two statements to be logically equivalent, their truth values (true or false) must be the same for every variation of their constituent variables. In other words, if the truth tables of both statements are the same for every possible value of their variables, then they are logically equivalent.

For example;

The two statements P ∩ (Q U R) and (P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) are logically equivalent.

If P, Q and R are all true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = true

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = true

If P, Q and R are all true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = false

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false

If P = false, Q = true and R = true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = false

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false

Checking for all other possible combinations of truth values of P, Q and R will always give the same results for the two statements, therefore, they are logically equivalent.

Answer:

C: parallelogram

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

200 test tubes will fill the container

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

We need to find out how many 5 milliliter tubes will fill a 1 liter container

First, let's convert everything to the same unit, as the tubes and the container are in different units.

Let's do milliliters, as those are smaller than liters and we will avoid having decimals.

there are 1,000 milliliters in a liter (the unit prefix "milli-" means "thousand")

Let's say the number of test tubes needed to fill the container is x

As each tube has 5 milliliters of water, 5x milliliters will equal 1,000 milliliters (1 liter)

as an equation, that's

5x=1,000

divide both sides by 5

x=200

So that means 200 test tubes will fill the container

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Here is how to start

Step-by-step explanation:    7  2  13  42

1 milliliter is one one thousands of a liter      1 milliliter  = 0.001 liter

1000 milliliter is equal to 1 liter

How many 5 milliliter test tubes are in 1 liter?

1000 milliliter / 5 milliliter per test tube   =  ________  test tubes

Answer:

8^2+12x

Step-by-step explanation:

4x(2x+3)

=4x times 2x+4x times 3

=4 times 2xx+4 times 3x

Answer:

8x^2 +12x

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1) Multiply each term in the parentheses by 4x

4xx2x+4xx3

Step 2) Calcuate the product

8x^2 +12x

Answer:

10x-5

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=5x

g(x)=2x-1

To create a composite function, replace x in f(x) with g(x)

f(g(x)) = 5(g(x) = 5(2x-1) = 10x-5

Answer:

129469.3194

342000

212530.6806

Step-by-step explanation:

Going to assume that the 8% is a nominal, montly rate

which means the effective monthly rate is .08/12= .006667

using the annuity immediate formula...

a.)

[tex]950(\frac{1-(1+.006667)^{-30*12}}{.006667})=129469.3194[/tex]

b.) we would pay 950*30*12= 342000

c.) the amount in interest would be 342000-129469.3194=212530.6806

a) The loan one can afford is $1,29,460.2

b) The total amount of money paid to the loan company over the life of the loan is $342,000.

c)  $212539.8 of the total amount paid is interest.

To determine the answers to these questions, we'll need to use the formula for calculating a fixed monthly mortgage payment:

[tex]M = \frac{P \times r \times (1 + r)^n}{((1 + r)^n - 1)}[/tex]

where:

M is the monthly payment,

P is the principal loan amount,

r is the monthly interest rate (annual interest rate divided by 12),

and n is the total number of payments (number of years multiplied by 12).

Given:

Monthly payment (M) = $950

Loan term = 30 years

Interest rate = 8% per year

a) How big of a loan can you afford?

Let's calculate the principal loan amount (P):

First, we need to convert the annual interest rate to a monthly interest rate:

r = 0.08 / 12

= 0.00667

n = 30 years × 12 months

n= 360

Using the formula and plugging in the values we have:

[tex]950 = \frac{P \times 0.00667 \times (1 + 0.00667)^{360}}{((1 + 0.00667)^{360} - 1)}[/tex]

[tex]950 = \frac{P \times 0.00667 \times 10.948}{10.948 - 1}[/tex]

[tex]950=\frac{P \times 0.07302316}{9.948}[/tex]

[tex]950\times9.948 = 0.0730P[/tex]

Divide by 0.073:

Now we can solve for P:

[tex]P=\frac{9450.6}{0.0730}[/tex]

[tex]P = 1,29,460.2[/tex]

Therefore, you can afford a loan amount of $1,29,460.2

b) The total amount paid to the loan company can be calculated by multiplying the monthly payment by the total number of payments:

Total amount = Monthly payment × Total number of payments

Total amount =[tex]$950 \times 360[/tex]

Total amount = [tex]342,000[/tex]

Therefore, the total amount of money paid to the loan company over the life of the loan is $342,000.

c) To find out how much of the total amount paid is interest, we can subtract the principal loan amount from the total amount:

Interest = Total amount - Principal loan amount

Interest = [tex]342,000 - 129460.2[/tex]

=$212539.8

Therefore, $212539.8 of the total amount paid is interest.

To learn more on Simple Interest click:

https://brainly.com/question/30964674

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

t8 = a1 + (n - 1)*d

t8 = 17

17 = a1 + 7*d

t12 = 25

25 = a1 + 11d

17 = a1 + 7d Subtract

8 = 4d Divide by 4

8/4 = 4d/4

2 = d

17 = a1 + 7d

17 = a1 + 7*2

17 = a1 + 14 Subtract 14

3 = a1

Sum 20 terms

The 20 term = a1 + 19*2

The 20 term = 3 + 38

= 41

Sum = (a1 + a20) * 20 / 2

Sum = (3 + 41)* 20/2

Sum = 44 * 10

Sum = 440

Answer:

You could save $20

Step-by-step explanation:

For buying them separately for $30 each for 5 people it would be $150 but if you buy the first option you would get 5 admission tickets for only $130

Answer:

20 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

for the first deal is 5 for $130

and the second is for $30

$30 times 5 (the number of people) = $150

$150-$130= is 20

answer: $20

Answer:

4 over 3

because is in side the bracket is part of inequalities