What is the 25th amendment

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

D. The Growth of Cities

Explanation:

This answer seems to be correct to me since a lot of cities including New York were growing rapidly during the Industrial Revolution with the factories producing more goods and more people moving to urban areas looking for jobs allowed these cities to grow and expand.

Answer: Shay's rebellion had brought out the weakness of the Article of Confederation. It had found that the central government has no efficiency to govern the government and shouted for reconstruction of the article.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Homestead Act of 1862 was one of the most significant and enduring events in the westward expansion of the United States. By granting 160 acres of free land to claimants, it allowed nearly any man or woman a "fair chance.

Explanation:

hope this helps you!

correct answer is B; it encouraged americans to settle and develop the land west of the mississippi river.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

casual,unattached................

Answer: A

Explanation: Took the test

a\a\a\

a

a

aa

aa

a

a

a

a

Answer: A. Comanche

Explanation: I took the test and got it right.

Answer: Houston rejected the actions of the Texas Secession Convention, believing it had overstepped its authority in becoming a member state of the newly formed Confederacy. He refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy and was deposed from office.

Explanation: Please make me brainliest :)

Texans from the western and northern regions of the state are against secession because they had an economy that worked independently from enslaved labor. Thus, option 'A' is the correct option.

Galveston and Harrison's counties were opposed to secession by slaveholding former Whigs. Attitudes toward independence were impacted by local needs as well. Galveston's slaveholding Whigs frequently engaged in large business transactions with New York and English merchants. Their operations would be impacted by any interruption to the Union. Not everyone in Texas supported the war, as the close outcomes of the 1861 governor election demonstrated.

About 30% of Texans, according to historians, were Unionists. As time would show, many of these dissenters would suffer severe consequences as a result of their beliefs. The letter outlines a number of justifications for secession, including support for "sister slave-holding States," incapacity of the federal government to thwart Indian incursions, raids for slaves, and other border-crossing acts of banditry.

Learn more about Texans opposing secession, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15981113

#SPJ5

Answer:

From what I can gather I know that her election was so important because of her slim chance she had on being reelected as "Speaker of House".

Hope this helps lol

Explanation:

Answer:

To force american indian to give up their native cultures and adopt new traditions

Explanation:

Answer :On October 6, 1908, the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary announces its annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, dual provinces in the Balkan region of Europe formerly under the control of the Ottoman Empire.

Explanation:

Have great day!

Answer:

its b i think

Explanation:

answer the answer is a

Answer:

Saint Lazarus

Explanation:

Answer:

The Roman Republic was the era of classical Roman civilization, led by the Roman people, beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire.

Explanation:

Explanation:

The Long March was indeed a revolutionary withdrawal to avoid the prosecution of the Kuomintang (KMT or Chinese Progressive Party) army conducted by the Red Army of both the People's Republic of China, the mainstay of the People ’s Liberation.

Answer:

King Tut is important because he was the best ruler of Ancient Egypt

Explanation:

So the answer is the fact of that king Tut is important for he was the best ruler so it's the 4th one on your checkboxes

Answer:

The tomb of King Tutankhamen is one of the most famous because of its well-known discovery by Howard Carter, a British archaeologist. The tomb was important because it let archaeologists record what an Egyptian king’s tomb looked like and learn more about ancient Egypt.

Explanation:

I hope this helped. I know it's not one of the answers but it should help a little bit.

Answer: D

Explanation:

Everyone doesn’t kniw how much credits they need at first

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

Hope this helps

Explanation:

Years ago, Edward Crab's courses in American foreign relations—and

specifically, his interest in American empire—inspired me to explore this field, and I

am grateful to have been able to study it under his guidance. His patience, good

humor, and unfailing encouragement of me in my research and my career have been

invaluable. Chandon Brown’s suggestions and enthusiasm for this study as a

contribution to American cultural history have enriched it, as have the suggestions of

James Accord, who offered repeated close readings and valuable insights into the

British empire. This study was further strengthened by the suggestions of Kinsey

Braver, who brought his expertise in American expansion during the Middle Period to

this project. Parts of this dissertation also benefited from the comments of the

members of William and Mai's dissertation discussion group and participants at the

annual meetings of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.

The staff of William and Mary’s Swed Library—especially Sheila Brown,

Don Welsh, and Alan Zollverein—have been quite helpful.

Answer:

Online sources can be altered while offline sources cannot be altered which makes it a bit better

Explanation:

Answer:

I think if you use an offline source, then you spend less time on the internet, and you engage more. versus if you are online there are so many distractions. for example what if your favorite you...tube...er.. posts a to die for video, but you are studying online, that would be a major distraction and quite honestly a chance to procrastinate. hope this helped.

Answer:1. It requires a three-fourths ratification from the states to become law.

The Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed in 1923. It wouldn’t be passed as a possible amendment until 1972. Because there is a 75% requirement for ratification by the states to make an amendment to the Constitution, 38 states must agree with the proposal for it to become law. Congress set a deadline of 1982 for legislatures across the country to ratify the amendment. By the time the deadline expired, only 35 had endorsed the idea.

If Congress were to pass another version of the Equal Rights Amendment today, then that process would need to start over. There is still no guarantee that there would be enough support at the state level to approve the amendment.

2. Five states have actually rescinded their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.

In the 1970s, there were five states that decided to rescind or withdraw their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. They were Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky, and South Dakota. What is interesting about the Constitution is that it only speaks to the power of a state to ratify an amendment. It does not suggest that there is a power in place to rescind this authorization. The current precedents would suggest that it would not be possible to do so. If another state were to join the 37 who have already said yes to this idea, then it would likely create another legal showdown that would need to be settled in the Supreme Court.

It should also be noted that a federal court ruled that offering a time extension for the amendment was unconstitutional and that states could withdraw their previous support, creating a different precedent to consider. The Supreme Court only ruled that the entire point was moot because there was not a complete ratification.

3. It would not protect people who do not identify as male or female.

Because the Equal Rights Amendment was originally crafted over 40 years ago, the recent issues of gender identification would not be included in the final text after ratification in the amendment’s current form. The goal is to provide women with equal protections, which is a necessary first step. Individuals who identify as non-binary, agender, or facing androgyny choices may not receive the same protections under the law. There is also the possibility that transgender individuals who complete their transition may not qualify because of their “change” from one gender to another.

4. The amendment could take away some of the benefits that women enjoy.

Phyllis Schalfly does not apologize for her opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. Even in 2007, when writing a piece for the Los Angeles Times, she said that the process of granting equality should not involve taking away the privileges that women have fought so hard to earn in the first place.

“The amendment would require women to be drafted into military combat any time men were conscripted,” she wrote. “[It] would abolish the presumption that the husband should support his wife and take away Social Security benefits for wives and widows. It would also give federal courts and the federal government enormous new powers to reinterpret every law that makes a distinction based on gender, such as those related to marriage, divorce, and alimony.”

5. It could create fewer barriers to prematurely ending human life potentiality.

Whether you support the idea of abortion, are against it, or find yourself somewhere in the middle, this medical procedure does create an ending to that human life potentiality. There are times when it may be medically necessary. Some may pursue such an action because of their personal preferences or needs. When looking at how the ERA would address this issue, there is an excellent chance based on previous state-based rulings that it would expand opportunities where permitted. Just as this option was listed as a potential advantage, it could also be a potential disadvantage depending on what your perspective happens to be.

A Final Thought on the Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment

It is easy to get bogged down in the semantics of an argument about a specific piece of legislation, forgetting that we are all basically on the same side. Well over 95% of the U.S. population supports the idea of ensuring that women receive the same rights as women guaranteed in the structure of our government. How we decide to make that happen is our debate.

Some suggest that the 14th Amendment does enough, while others say it is not enough. There are benefits to the ERA that would be helpful, but it could also provide a lot of uncertainty. Even the chance to pass it now is uncertain since the deadline given to it is in the resolution language that proposes the text instead of the amendment itself.

Explanation: source - https://connectusfund.org/7-strongest-pros-and-cons-of-the-equal-rights-amendment

Answer:

It allowed everybody to vote and have the same rights no matter the color of your skin or gender

Explanation:

hope thta helped

Answer:

Racism still exist today in our everyday lives.

When you look at someone you most likely see a normal person but not to other people. Some people look at people and watch them because of there race or color. When a white person walks into a store no one watches them they are fine. But when a black person walks into a store a police or someone will follow them down the aisles making sure they don't steal anything. Why you may ask, there is no rhyme or reason of why they do this they do it because some black people are bad people or thieves so now all of them are because of skin tone. But why not white people? Because white people are "prettier" or they "look better" but that isn't true this year alone white people have killed more people than black people but they are still the bad ones. A little suspicious right?

Explanation:

         </3 PureBeauty

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I found the answer on a different site

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica

Explanation:

Answer:

i believe its C

Explanation:

Answer:

The Ten Commandments, or Decalogue, are the ten rules given to Moses by God that dictate how humans should live and interact with one another, according to Judaic and Christian traditions, with God being referred to as Yahweh.

Explanation:

Answer: Ares

Explanation:

Answer: Kratos

Explanation:cuz yea

Answer:

Northerners didn't want Texas to join the Union because it did so as a ... revolutionary in the fight for Texas's independence from Mexico. ... with his old political rival, Sam Houston, in typically florid prose: “The ... still uses the motto “Texas: It's like a whole other country,” Lamar

Explanation:

Answer: A. Signed the Emancipation Proclamation

Explanation:

The Gettysburg Address talked about the fallen soldiers of the civil war, which was a direct result of his signing the proclamation