Explanation:
During the time of the Roman Empire, economic and social imbalances were a major factor causing unrest throughout the empire. In particular, rising costs of living, unequal wealth distribution, and heavy taxation all contributed to a feeling of discontent among Roman citizens. Additionally, the rise of Christianity caused political tensions between different religious factions, while long-standing divisions between the freeborn and the enslaved created further economic disparities. Finally, the decline of public infrastructure and the inadequate provision of public services contributed to a growing sense of dissatisfaction and unrest.
In 450 BC, Roman leaders introduced a code of written law known as
citizens.
Reset
Next
which outlines the rules and rights of Roman
In 450 BC, Roman leaders introduced a code of written law known as Law of the Twelve Tables which outlines the rules and rights of Roman.
What was the Law of the Twelve Tables during Roman Era?The Twelve Tables were written at the request of the plebeians, who felt their legal rights were being hampered by the fact that court judgments were rendered according to unwritten custom preserved only among a small group of learned patricians.
Beginning in 451, the first set of commissioners created ten tables, which were later supplemented by two more. The code was formally posted in the Roman Forum in 450, most likely on bronze tablets. The written recording of the law in the Twelve Tables allowed the plebeians to become acquainted with the law while also protecting themselves from patricians' abuses of power.
Read more about Twelve Tables
brainly.com/question/20951861
#SPJ1
the events and tactics shown in the image of an African American woman being carried to a police wagon contributed most directly to the passage of which of the following laws
The events and tactics shown in the image of an African American woman being carried to a police wagon contributed most directly to the passage of civil right Act of 1964. Option d
What is the Civil Rights Act of 1964The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was law passed by the congress in 1964 to stop discrimination based on ''race, color, religion, sex, or national origin'' , it also provides the ban on unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations and also forbade the discrimination in any public accommodations and'' federally funded programs'. It also strengthened the enforcement of voting rights and the desegregation of schools.
This was triggered by demonstration in Brooklyn, New York African as an image shown of a American woman, being carried to police patrol wagon
Learn more about The Civil Rights Act of 1964 on
onbrainly.com/question/1094200
#SPJ1
Based on the two passages, Douglass and Dana differ in their views of the effect of the Civil War in that Douglass believes that the war has [...]?
Based on the two passages, Douglass and Dana differ in their views of the effect of the Civil War in that Douglass believes that the war has created a political climate in which black rights expansion seemed more feasible, Dana believed that such expansion faced opposition from those who blamed blacks for the South's defeat.
It also created a short window for white voters to empower blacks, and Dana believes blacks won't be empowered until the memory of the war begins to fade. Dana believes Southerners are beginning to recognize the important role of black workers in the post-war economy.
To know more about civil war click on the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/29766424
#SPJ4
What were the major shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, and how did the Constitution fix these problems?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation, which served as the first constitution of the United States from 1781 to 1789, had several major shortcomings that contributed to the drafting and adoption of the Constitution.
Weak central government: Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was intentionally made weak to avoid the tyranny that the colonists had experienced under British rule. However, this resulted in a lack of central authority, with no power to regulate commerce or levy taxes, leading to financial instability and difficulties in resolving disputes between states.
No executive or judicial branch: The Articles of Confederation established only a unicameral legislature, the Congress, which had no executive or judicial branch to enforce laws or interpret them. As a result, the government was unable to enforce laws or effectively address internal and external threats.
Inability to regulate trade: The Articles of Confederation prohibited the federal government from regulating interstate or foreign commerce, leading to disputes between states and a lack of cohesion in economic policy.
Inability to raise an army: The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a standing army, and the central government had to rely on the states to provide troops during times of war. This led to a lack of military preparedness and made it difficult to respond quickly to threats.
The Constitution addressed these shortcomings in several ways:
Strong central government: The Constitution established a stronger central government with the power to tax, regulate commerce, and make and enforce laws.
Separation of powers: The Constitution created three separate branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial, providing for a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
Interstate commerce: The Constitution gave the federal government the power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, promoting economic unity and preventing states from enacting protectionist policies.
Standing army: The Constitution provided for a standing army and gave the federal government the power to raise and maintain a military force, enabling the United States to better defend itself against threats.
Overall, the Constitution addressed the major shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation by providing for a stronger central government, a system of checks and balances, and the ability to regulate commerce and raise an army.
Which of the following was a result of violent activities associated with union activism near the end of the 19th century? (5 points)
Business leaders began employing only native-born workers under "yellow dog" contracts.
Unions became linked to radical ideas, and public support decreased sharply.
Union leaders attempted to improve their image by accepting women and other minorities.
The federal government passed strict laws related to union formation and activities.
Answer:
Unions became linked to radical ideas, and public support decreased sharply.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
12
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two factors influenced the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867?
10
the prospect of gaining native Alaskans as citized
a political plot to overthrow the Russian government
the belief in Manifest Destiny
a desire to expand American trade in the Pacific
the public's support in favor of the purchase
Reset
Next
Two factors that influenced the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867 are the belief in Manifest Destiny and the desire to expand American trade in the Pacific. The correct options are c and d.
What is manifest destiny?Manifest Destiny was the idea that white Americans were divinely ordained to settle the entire continent of North America. The ideology of Manifest Destiny inspired a variety of measures designed to remove or destroy the native population. US President James K. Polk is the leader most associated with Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny inflamed sectional tensions over slavery, which ultimately led to the Civil War. Due to internal constraints and the problem of slavery, according to historian Frederick Merk, the United States never made manifest destiny a national priority.
Former American President John Quincy Adams, who had once been a strong proponent of the idea behind manifest destiny, had altered his views by 1843 and rejected expansionism since it would have resulted in the spread of slavery in Texas.
Learn more about Manifest, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15205517
#SPJ9
FORUM DESCRIPTION
Van Voorst, Chapter 2, Indigenous Religions
Question: Why do you think that ancient and indigenous people would
tend to see Nature and natural forces as "divine"?
The ancient and indigenous people would tend to see Nature and natural forces as "divine" as the people wanted to believe in something and there was no scientific reason at that time.
What are Indigenous Religions?Indigenous believe that everything on the planet, both human and non-living things, has a unique spirit that constitutes a part of the larger soul of universe.
In this, they believed that nature was the god and had powers. As they shall not upset nature as it will harm them. Other groups may occasionally be combined with it and practiced in this manner.
Learn more about Indigenous Religions, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13171883
#SPJ9
Consider the logic in this statement. If Malcolm X believed the Vietnam War was wrong, would that mean he believed all violence was wrong? If he believed it was not right to draft Americans to fight in the nation’s defense abroad, would it be right to “do whatever is necessary” to defend our own people right here in this country?
1 yes 2 no
1 it does not mean that violence is wrong
2 do whatever is necessary means to draft people
How did Institutes, by Cassiodorus, help to keep Roman classical scholarship alive? Put the events in chronological order
Cassiodorus was a Roman statesman and writer who lived in the 6th century CE. After retiring from his post as a high-ranking official, he established a monastery in southern Italy and founded a school for the preservation of classical learning.
One of his most significant works was his collection of writings known as the Institutes, which played a crucial role in keeping Roman classical scholarship alive. The following events occurred in chronological order:
Cassiodorus retired from his position as a high-ranking official in the court of Theoderic the Great in the mid-6th century CE.
Cassiodorus established a monastery and founded a school in southern Italy, where he dedicated himself to preserving the classical learning of the Roman Empire.
Cassiodorus wrote his most significant work, the Institutes, which was a collection of readings from the works of Roman authors and designed to provide a comprehensive education in the classical tradition.
The Institutes became a widely-used textbook in the Middle Ages, both in Italy and throughout Europe.
The widespread use of the Institutes helped to keep the knowledge of Roman classical scholarship alive, as the works of the ancient authors that Cassiodorus included in his collection continued to be studied and translated by scholars for centuries to come.
For such more question on Cassiodorus.
https://brainly.com/question/16875656
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not part of the civil rights?
The right to vote
The right to education
The right to work
The right to believe (or not to believe)
Answer:
Your answer is the right to work
Explanation:
The right to work is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law through its inclusion in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, where the right to work emphasizes economic, social and cultural development.
I need help on this question,
In what ways were the environment and nature central to the religion of most California Native tribes? Compare this to what you know about Western Culture, Christianity, or non-Christian culture/religion. Do you see more differences than similarities? Give examples to support your answer.
A question that might help: how did the Natives demonstrate their reverence for and dependence upon the natural world?
The answer is:
Native American religions, religious beliefs and sacramental practices of the indigenous peoples of North and South America. Until the 1950s it was commonly assumed that the religions of the surviving Native Americans were little more than curious anachronisms, dying remnants of humankind’s childhood. These traditions lacked sacred texts and fixed doctrines or moral codes and were embedded in societies without wealth, mostly without writing, and without recognizable systems of politics or justice or any of the usual indicators of civilization. Today the situation has changed dramatically. Scholars of religion, students of the ecological sciences, and individuals committed to expanding and deepening their own religious lives have found in these traditions many distinct and varied religious worlds that have struggled to survive but that retain the ability to inspire.This is Rome's first emperor, under whose rule the empire achieved unequaled peace and prosperity.
Ceasar Augustus is Rome's first emperor, under whose rule the empire achieved unequaled peace and prosperity.
The first Roman emperor, Caesar Augustus, often known as Octavian, ruled from 27 BC until his death in 14 AD. He is regarded as one of the greatest leaders in human history and is best known for founding the Roman Principate, the first stage of the Roman Empire.
He was born into an established and affluent equestrian branch of the plebeian gens Octavia and went by the name Gaius Octavius. After the murder of his maternal great-uncle Julius Caesar in 44 BC, Octavius was listed in the latter's testament as his adopted son and successor; as a result, he received Caesar's name, inheritance, and the allegiance of his legions. To stop Caesar's assassins, he established the Second Triumvirate with Mark Antony and Marcus Lepidus.
Learn more about Ceasar Augustus here brainly.com/question/13986911
#SPJ4
Do you agree or disagree with its limits on free speech of "clear and present danger" test? why?
I believe that the "clear and present danger" standard places restrictions on free expression. While I agree that the right to free speech is an essential one, I also think that it should be regulated and must be weighed against other crucial factors, such public safety. endangers public order and safety.
Write a description of the "clear and present danger" test.In order to establish the parameters of free speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution, the "clear and present danger" test is utilised as a legal norm in the United States. In order to balance the right to free speech with the interests of the government in maintaining public safety, the test was first developed in the seminal case Schenck v. United States (1919).
If speech poses a "clear and present danger" to public order or safety, it may be prohibited under the "clear and present danger" standard. This implies that the government may impose restrictions on communication that constitutes an immediate threat to the community, such as inciting violence or disseminating misleading information about a contagious disease.
Hence, the answer is, I believe that the "clear and present danger" standard places restrictions on free expression. While I agree that the right to free speech is an essential one, I also think that it should be regulated and must be weighed against other crucial factors, such public safety.
To learn more about, "clear and present danger follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27399929
#SPJ1
Why do you think would immigrants want to leave their native land, families and everything they’ve ever known and move to a foreign country?
Answer:
There are a variety of reasons why immigrants may choose to leave their native land and move to a foreign country. Some of the most common reasons include:
Economic opportunities: Many immigrants may move to a foreign country in search of better job opportunities and higher wages. They may come from countries with struggling economies or limited job prospects, and believe that moving to a new country will offer them more financial stability.
Political instability: In some cases, immigrants may leave their home countries due to political instability, violence, or persecution. They may fear for their safety or the safety of their families, and believe that moving to a new country will offer them more security.
Family reunification: Immigrants may also choose to move to a new country in order to be reunited with family members who have already emigrated. This is particularly common in cases where families have been separated for extended periods of time due to immigration policies or other factors.
Education: Some immigrants may move to a new country in order to pursue higher education opportunities. They may believe that studying abroad will provide them with better educational opportunities and career prospects.
Overall, the decision to leave one's native land and move to a foreign country is a complex one that is influenced by a variety of individual, economic, political, and social factors.
What right did the Lawrence v. Texas case address?
Right to bear arms
Free exercise of religion
Cruel and unusual punishment
Privacy right
Answer:
D) Privacy Right
Explanation:
The court in Lawrence v. Texas explicitly held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by the substantive due under the Fourteenth Amendment.
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all. This is just as true of the man who puts ‘native’ before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States."-Source: Theodore Roosevelt, in an address delivered before the Knights of Columbus, 1915The excerpt best serves as evidence of which of the following trends during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era?answer choicesthe escalation of immigration from non-European countriesthe rise of nativist sentiment in response to the rise in immigrationthe increase in public debates over the assimilation of immigrantsthe growth of patriotism following an attack on the United States
The excerpt best serves as evidence of the growth of patriotism following an attack on the United States during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. The Option D is correct.
What was the term hyphenated Americanism about?In the United States, the term hyphenated American refers to the use of a hyphen (in some styles of writing) between the name of an ethnicity and the word "American" in compound nouns, e.g., as in "Irish-American". In times of war, calling someone a "hyphenated American" was an insult implying divided political or national loyalties.
From 1890 to 1920, it was used to disparage Americans of foreign birth or ancestry who showed a fondness for their ancestral language and/or culture. During World War I, it was most commonly used against Americans of White ethnic origin who supported U.S. neutrality or opposed the idea of an American alliance with the British Empire.
Read more about hyphenated Americanism
brainly.com/question/28198707
#SPJ1
Directions: Imagine you are a Bantu that traveled to Southern Africa.
Your uncle who stayed in Northern Africa wants to know what it is like.
Write him a letter describing your journey and experiences during your
migration. Explain what your civilization is like now in Southern Africa and
comment if it is better in the south or back in the north where you originally
were from. Your letter must be at least 6 sentences long.
Moving from one location to another with the purpose of living there either permanently or temporarily is known as human migration (geographic region).
What are migration and its causes?People migrate when they relocate from one location to another with the intention of settling down. Causes: Migration was frequently prompted by environmental conditions in preindustrial cultures, such as the demand for resources brought on by overpopulation.
In general, there are two types of variables that affect people's migration decisions. Where a person now resides, push factors exist that reduce the appeal of staying there. Political turmoil, a lack of employment prospects, or congestion might all be push factors.
Learn more about migration here:
https://brainly.com/question/28827966
#SPJ9
How did Nat Turner oppose enslavement?
Question 1 options:
He led a rebellion against white enslavers, killing many people.
He was a leader on the Underground Railroad.
He became a spy for the North during the Civil War.
He sued his enslaver and won the case, setting him
A) Nat Turner opposed slavery by staging an uprising against white slave owners, which resulted in the deaths of many people.
Nat Turner: who was he?A slave named Nathanial "Nat" Turner (1800–1831) organized a slave uprising on August 21, 1831. Up to 200 Black people may have been killed as a result of his action, which also sparked a new wave of harsh laws that forbade enslaved people from gathering, moving, or attending school.
Abolitionist and pro-slavery beliefs that lasted in that area up until the American Civil War were also strengthened by the insurrection (1861–65). Turner was raised by Benjamin Turner, who allowed him to get an education in reading, writing, and religion, on the Virginia farm where he was born.
He was sold three times as a youngster, contracted out to John Travis in the 1820s, and later rose to prominence as a fiery preacher and leader of African slaves on Benjamin Turner's farm and in his Southampton County neighborhood. He claimed that God had chosen him to free the slaves from servitude.
Learn more about Nat Turner with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/8146462
#SPJ1
Identify two events that helped Octavian to become the only ruler of the Roman Empire.
Julius Caesar named Octavian as his heir.
Octavian successfully defeated his rival Mark Antony in war.
Octavian formed an alliance with the Carthaginian empire.
Julius Caesar was deeply unpopular among the plebeians of Rome.
Emperor Augustus supported Octavian's rise to power.
Answer:
Octavian defeated the forces of Sextus Pompey at the Battle of Naulochus. Octavian gained control of the Roman Senate. Octavian was given the title of Augustus, signifying his rise as the ruler of Rome.
FILL IN THE BLANK the assassination of _____ in sarajevo by a serbian nationalist was the spark that ignited the war.
What did Jackson reveal about his presidency when he challenged the Supreme Court to enforce its ruling in the Cherokee cases?
Answer: Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States ...
Explanation:
Explain: How does the painting, Arnolfini Double Portrait, by Jan van Eyck show details of the Northern Renaissance beliefs in Protestant religious viewpoints?
Answer:
Explanation:
The painting "Arnolfini Double Portrait" by Jan van Eyck is generally considered a secular portrait, and while it was created during a time of significant religious upheaval in the Northern Renaissance, it is not believed to directly depict Protestant religious viewpoints. The painting is not considered to have a clear religious or political message, but rather to be a representation of the sitter, who was a wealthy merchant, and his wife or companion.
The Northern Renaissance was characterized by a greater focus on individualism, realism, and the natural world, which can be seen in the detailed and lifelike rendering of the sitters and the intricate details of their clothing and surroundings. However, this increased realism does not necessarily indicate a specific religious viewpoint.
While the painting was created during a time of religious change in the Northern Renaissance, with the rise of Protestantism, there is no clear evidence that the painting itself was meant to depict Protestant religious beliefs. It is not a painting that directly relates to the Protestant religious viewpoint, but rather a portrait that captures the style, realism, and attention to detail that characterized Northern Renaissance art of the time.
This map attempts to show the order in which battles at these locations took place during the Civil War. What mistake did this illustrator make when trying to place these events in the order in which they actually took place?
A. The illustrator should have identified Antietam second and Gettysburg third.
B. The illustrator should not have included Richmond because a battle never took place near that location.
C. The illustrator should have identified Richmond as the location of the first battle of the Civil War.
D. The illustrator should have placed Gettysburg further south into North Carolina instead of Pennsylvania.
"The illustrator should have identified Antietam second and Gettysburg third", is the mistake that the illustrator made while attempting to position these events in the sequence in which they actually happened. Option A holds the truth.
The map aims to depict the order of engagements at these places during the Civil War.
The Battle of Fort Sumter was the first battle of the Civil War, which took place in April 1861. The Battle of Antietam (also known as the Battle of Sharpsburg) occurred on September 17, 1862, and the Battle of Gettysburg took place from July 1-3, 1863. Therefore, the correct order of battles in terms of time would be:
Battle of Fort SumterBattle of AntietamBattle of GettysburgLearn more about the Civil War brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ1
What were the economic factors that drove maritime exploration by Europeans?
Answer:
A desire for Asian spices and other Asian goods: European maritime expansion began with the goal of establishing new trade routes to African and Asian markets to buy ivory, pepper, cotton, and sugar.
Explanation:
Pls mark brainliest
true/false. as a result of king philip's war puritan writers a new type of racial hatred became a defining feature of indian- english relationships in the northeast
Answer:
trueeee
Explanation:
why not ?
What is NOT true about the New Deal?
a. It brought an end to the Depression.
b. It helped people survive the Depression.
c. It gave more power to the Presidency.
d. It gave more power to the federal government.
The New Deal did not bring an end to the Great Depression, but it did provide a series of relief, recovery, and reform programs that helped people survive the economic crisis. The correct option is a.
What does the New Deal do?As it put people back to work, the New Deal restored a sense of security. It established the foundation for a regulatory state that could safeguard the interests of all Americans, wealthy and not, and so support the economic system's more effective operation.
The New Deal was a set of policies and programs implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his administration in response to the economic crisis of the 1930s. The New Deal aimed to provide relief to the unemployed and those in poverty, stimulate economic recovery, and implement long-term reforms to prevent future economic crises.
Thus, the ideal selection is option a.
Learn more about the New Deal here:
https://brainly.com/question/815650
#SPJ1
Mountain men served as guides and helped settle Oregon. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
Mountain men served as guides and helped settle Oregon. The statement is True.
What are Mountain men?Trappers who were attracted to the west by the advantages of the fur trade were referred to as "Mountain Men." They guide visitors into Oregon Country on difficult mountain routes. They learned of the several routes west through the Plains.
Two mountain men, Jim Bridger, and Kit Carson supported settlements by establishing new pathways that connected the east and west. The Oregon Trail was the most popular path for trekking.
Therefore, the statement is True.
Learn more about Mountain men, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8667137
#SPJ9
assume the government bureaucrats were in charge of deciding how many pet snakes to produce instead of a free market. fully explain why the government system would likely be less efficient than the free market system
If government bureaucrats were in charge of deciding how many pet snakes to produce, it is likely that the production and distribution of pet snakes would be less efficient than in a free market system.
Why is market economy more effective?A free market enables buyers to find the items they want without discovering the people who provide those products because there is some money to be gained via providing these matchmaking services. Due to the significant reduction in transaction costs for both buyers and sellers, markets become more effective.
Why may a government be necessary in a free market system?When the advantages of a government programme outweigh the disadvantages, there is an economic function for government to perform in a market economy. Governments frequently fund the military, address environmental issues, define and safeguard property rights, and work to increase competition in the market.
To know more about free market system, visit:
brainly.com/question/30280042
#SPJ1
Which of the following best explains the importance of White v. Regester?
A. It is unconstitutional to reapportion congressional districts according to a new census. B. The census is unconstitutional.
C. States can't draw their congressional districts to favor white candidates over minority candidates. D. Minorities in America didn't have the same voting rights as white voters prior to this case.
Option C, "States can't draw their congressional districts to favor white candidates over minority candidates," best explains the importance of White v. Regester.
What makes the case important?White v. Regester was a landmark case in the United States that dealt with the issue of racial gerrymandering, the practice of manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to benefit a particular political party or racial group. The case held that drawing district lines to intentionally favor white candidates over minority candidates was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The case was significant because it established that states could not use race as a predominant factor in drawing district lines, and that any redistricting plan must be evaluated under a standard of "one person, one vote" to ensure equal representation for all citizens. This decision helped to ensure fair representation for minority voters and paved the way for other court decisions and legislative actions to combat racial gerrymandering.
learn more about gerrymandering: https://brainly.com/question/28553109
#SPJ1
Conjecture how American history might have changed had andrew jackson been forced to use military might against south carolina.
In the American history might have changed had Andrew Jackson been forced to use military might against south Carolina. The Conjecture is Early Civil War.
What damage was caused to South Carolina by Andrew Jackson?
President Andrew Jackson questioned a state's authority to overturn a federal statute in a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina (commonly referred to as the "Nullification Proclamation") he issued on December 10, 1832.
In response, he sent a Force Bill to Congress, allowing the employment of federal troops in South Carolina to collect tariffs if required.
Therefore, in the American history might have changed had Andrew Jackson been forced to use military might against south Carolina. The Conjecture is Early Civil War.
To know more about the South Carolina by Andrew Jackson, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12537555
#SPJ9