Answer: You can divide a number by a fraction by flipping over the fraction and multiplying them together.
Step-by-step explanation:
For example:
Lets say we wanted to divide 8 by 3/4
8÷[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]
Change the division symbol into multiplication, and flip over the fraction (a great way to remember doing this is to remember the phrase Copy Dot Flip - Copy the first digit as it is, put a dot for multiplication, and then flip the fraction over)
8 ·[tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex]
Now, just multiply and reduce/simplify the fraction if needed
Final answer is [tex]\frac{32}{3}[/tex], no need to simplify or reduce
Hope that helps!!
what is the best estimate of 45 percent of 76
9514 1404 393
Answer:
In order of improvement:
383434.2 (actual value)Step-by-step explanation:
In my engineering experience, a method of estimating should satisfy two requirements:
it should be relatively easy to accomplish mentallyit should provide a means of estimating the error in the estimate__
Multiplication and division by 2 are generally easy to perform mentally.
We note that 45% is about 50%.
50% of 76 is 76/2 = 38 . . . a good starting estimate
45% is down 5% from 50%, so the actual value will be 5/50 = 10% lower than this first estimate
A good second estimate is 38 -0.10(40) = 34.
A better estimate is 38 -3.8 = 34.2, which is the actual value of the expression.
_____
Alternate approach
You could also transform the problem to 76% of 45, which is about 3/4 of 44, or about 33. Figuring the error adjustment on this approach is somewhat more difficult, as it is factors of 1/75 and 1/44 too low. 1 part in 44 is not too difficult to figure, as it is 33/44 = 3/4, so a better estimate is 33.75. It takes a calculator to figure 1 part in 75 of this, which is 0.45. Adding that amount gets you to the actual value of 34.2.
Simplify the complex fraction. 8/5 divide by 6 3/4 *
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]
First, simplify the 6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] to an improper fraction, which is:
[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]
Next rewrite the equation using the improper fraction:
[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]
Now, in order to divide the fraction, we will need to flip the second fraction over, and then multiply the two fractions together. A great way to remember this is the phrase Copy Dot Flip - Copy the first fraction, put a dot for multiplication, and flip the second fraction.
[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]·[tex]\frac{4}{27}[/tex]
Finally, multiply together and simplify/reduce if needed:
The final answer is [tex]\frac{32}{135}[/tex] and no simplification or reduction is needed
5/6x6/7=?? Please answer
[tex] \red { \orange {\boxed {\boxed{Answer}}}}[/tex]
[tex] = \frac{5}{6} \times \frac{6}{7} [/tex][tex] = \frac{5 \times 6}{6 \times 7} [/tex][tex] = \frac{30}{42} [/tex][tex] = \frac{30 \div 6}{42 \div 6} [/tex][tex] = \frac{5}{7} [/tex]#IfWrongPleaseReport
#StudyTogetherWithMe
#ILoveMath
Frank plans to spend no more than $85 on plants for his front garden. He purchases a salvia and three azaleas. The azaleas cost $22 each. Let c be the cost for a salvia. Which inequality below could be used to show how much money Frank spent on salvia?
Answer: 3×22+c≤85
Step-by-step explanation: i think the answer is 3×22+c≤85 because 3x 22 represent the total cost of azaleas + c the cost of salvia is less than or equal to 85 because the buget is 85 and it cannot be greater
Hope this helped
The inequality for the given situation is 66+c ≤ 85.
Given that, Frank plans to spend no more than $85 on plants for his front garden. He purchases a salvia and 3 azaleas. The azaleas cost $22 each.
What is inequality?In mathematics, inequality refers to a relationship that makes a non-equal comparison between two numbers or other mathematical expressions.
Let c be the cost for a salvia.
Three azaleas + A salvia ≤ 85
3×22+c ≤ 85
⇒ 66+c ≤ 85
Therefore, the inequality for the given situation is 66+c ≤ 85.
To learn more about the inequality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20383699.
#SPJ5
From the table below, determine whether the data shows an exponential function. Explain why or why not.
х
3 1 -1 -3
у
1 2 3 4
a. No; the domain values are at regular intervals and the range values have a common sum 1.
b. No; the domain values are not at regular intervals.
C. Yes; the domain values are at regular intervals and the range values have a common factor 2.
d. Yes; the domain values are at regular intervals and the range values have a common sum 1.
Answer:
B because the domains repeat themselves so it can not be a function
No; the domain values are not at regular intervals.
The correct option is b.
What is an exponential function?Mathematical functions with exponents include exponential functions. f(x) = bˣ, where b > 0 and b 1, is a fundamental exponential function.
In an exponential function, the domain values are usually at regular intervals, and the range values have a common factor or a common sum.
In the given data, the domain values are not at regular intervals.
The difference between 3 and 1 is 2, and the difference between 1 and -1 is 2, but the difference between -1 and -3 is -2.
This indicates that the domain values are not at regular intervals, which means that the data cannot be modeled by an exponential function.
Additionally, the range values also do not have a common factor or a common sum. The difference between consecutive y-values is 1, which is not a constant factor or sum.
Therefore, the data cannot be modeled by an exponential function.
To learn more about exponential;
https://brainly.com/question/14344314
#SPJ7
The life span of a graphing calculator manufactured by Texas Instruments has a normal distribution with a mean of 54 months and a standard deviation of 8 months. The company guarantees that any calculator that starts malfunctioning within 36 months of the purchase will be replaced by a new one. You apply the normal model and discover that this is approximately 1.22% of their graphing calculators. Texas Instruments has sold 75 million graphing calculators world- wide. How many of these would you expect to malfunction within 3 months (and thus need to be replaced)? Explain.
Answer:
The expected number of graphing calculators that malfunctions within 3 months and need to be replaced is 915,000.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X represents the number of graphing calculator that starts malfunctioning within 36 months of the purchase and needs to be replaced by a new one.
It is provided that X follows a normal distribution with a mean of 54 months and a standard deviation of 8 months.
Also, using the normal model it was determined that 1.22% of graphing calculator manufactured by Texas Instruments malfunctions and needs replacement.
That is,
P (X) = 0.0122
Texas Instruments has sold 75 million graphing calculators world- wide.
Compute the expected number of graphing calculators that malfunctions within 3 months and need to be replaced as follows:
E (X) = n × P (X)
= 75 × 10⁶ × 0.0122
= 915000
Thus, the expected number of graphing calculators that malfunctions within 3 months and need to be replaced is 915,000.
find the equation of the graphed function.
f(x)= _________
Answer:
y =(x+3) ^2
Step-by-step explanation:
The zero is -3 and it is the vertex (-3,0)
Using the vertex form of a parabola where ( h,k) is the vertex
y = a( x-h)^2 +k
y =a(x- -3) ^2+0
y =a(x+3) ^2
We also know another point is ( -1,4)
Substituting that point into the equation
4 = a( -1+3) ^2
4 = a( 2)^2
4 = a*4
Divide each side by 4
1 =a
The equation is
y =(x+3) ^2
how to simplify 2a³ × a⁴
Answer:
2a⁷
Step-by-step explanation:
you have to add 3 to 4
Help!!!
Lines b and c are parallel.
What is the measure of 26?
Answer:
m∠6 = 54°
Step-by-step explanation:
∠6 is equal to (5x + 9) because they are vertical angles. But, to be able to find the measure of ∠6, you will need to find the value of (5x + 9). So, since ∠5 is equal to (13x + 9) because they are Corresponding Angles, (5x + 9) and (13x + 9) are supplementary because they are a linear pair.
So:
m∠6 = 5x + 9 and
5x + 9 + 13x + 9 = 180°
18x + 18 = 180
18x = 162
x = 9
To find m∠6, plug in values:
m∠6 = 5x + 9
= 5(9) + 9
= 45 + 9
= 54°
Arachnophobia is the fear of spiders. People with arachnophobia suffer to different degrees, but they tend to react intensely to visible signs of the presence of spiders, such as webs. The director of a clinic decides to investigate different treatment types for arachnophobia. She gathers three groups of clients: One group receives in vivo flooding, which involves prolonged or repeated exposure to the actual anxiety-producing stimuli. The second group receives imaginal flooding, which involves the same techniques as in vivo flooding, except the exposure occurs in the client’s imagination. The third group receives no treatment. The results come in, and a statistician conducts an analysis of variance.
The ___________ is that there is no difference between the population means (in other words, there is no treatment effect).
The ___________is that at least one of the population means is different from another (in other words, there is an effect Of at least one Of the treatments).
Answer:
1. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the population means (in other words, there is no treatment effect).
2. The alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the population means is different from another (in other words, there is an effect Of at least one Of the treatments).
Step-by-step explanation:
In a statistical analysis, the statistician shares his participants into several groups and administers treatments to them. After administering the treatment, he might want to compare the values obtained to see if there is a difference. If he accepts the null hypothesis as true, that means that there was no difference between the population means. This can also be taken to mean that the result had no difference among the groups.
But if the alternative hypothesis was true, that means that the population means were not all equal and so, there was an effect from the treatment administered.
Answer:
1. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the population means (in other words, there is no treatment effect).
2. The alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the population means is different from another (in other words, there is an effect Of at least one Of the treatments).
The price of a sweater was reduced from $20 to $12, By what percentage was the price of the sweater reduced?
Answer:
40%
Step-by-step explanation:
12 ÷ 20 = .6
You can convert the .6 to a percentage by multiplying it:
.6 x 100 = 60%
If 12 is 60% of 20, then that means 40% was taken away.
Price of the sweater was reduced by 40%.
Given in the question,
Original Price of a sweater is $20.Price of the sweater was reduced from $20 to $12.Percentage reduction in the price from $20 to $12 can be calculated from the expression,
Percentage reduction = [tex]\frac{\text{Change in price}}{\text{Original price}}\times 100[/tex]
= [tex](\frac{20-12}{12})\times 100[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{8}{12}\times 100[/tex]
= 40%
Therefore, price of the sweater was reduced by 40%.
Learn more,
https://brainly.com/question/877552
which expression means 8 less twice a number
8-2n
2n-8
Answer:
I think 2n-8 because you are taking 8 away from 2 times a number
Step-by-step explanation:
What sample size is needed to give a margin of error within in estimating a population mean with 99% confidence, assuming a previous sample had .
This question is Incomplete
Complete Question
What sample size is needed to give a margin of error within ± 13 in estimating a population mean with 99% confidence, assuming a previous sample had s=116
Answer:
The sample size n = 530 samples
Step-by-step explanation:
Margin of Error formula = z × standard deviation/√n
Margin of Error = ± 13
Standard deviation = 116
z = z score of 99% = 2.58
±13 = 2.58 × 116/√n
Cross Multiply
±13 × √n = 2.58× 116
±13 × √n = 299.28
√n = 299.28/±13
√n = ± 23.0215384615
Square both sides
(√n)² = (±23.0215384615)²
n = 529.991233134
Approximately , n = 530 samples
A furniture manufacturer makes two types of furniture: chairs and sofas. The production of the sofas and chairs requires three operations: carpentry, finishing, and upholstery. Manufacturing a chair requires 3 hours of carpentry, 9 hours of finishing, and 2 hours of upholstery. Manufacturing a sofa requires 2 hours of carpentry, 4 hours of finishing, and 10 hours of upholstery. The factory has allocated at most 66 labor hours for carpentry, 180 labor hours for finishing, and 200 labor hours for upholstery. The prfit per chair is $90 and the profit per sofa is $75. The manufacturer wants to know how many chairs and how many sofas should be produced each day to maximize the profit.
Formulate a linear programming (LP)problem you would use to find a solution.
Answer:
Chair x₁ = 10
Sofa x₂ = 18
z(max) = 2250 $
Step-by-step explanation:
Information:
Operation-Profit Carpentry Finishing Upholstery Profit
hours hours hours $
Chair (x₁) 3 9 2 90
Sofa (x₂) 2 4 10 75
Objective Function z:
z = 90*x₁ + 75*x₂
Constrains:
1.-66 hours of carpentry available
3*x₁ + 2*x₂ ≤ 66
2.- 180 hours of finishing available
9*x₁ + 4*x₂ ≤ 180
3.- 200 hours of upholstery
2*x₁ + 10*x₂ ≤ 200
Model:
z = 90*x₁ + 75*x₂ to maximize
Subject to:
3*x₁ + 2*x₂ ≤ 66
9*x₁ + 4*x₂ ≤ 180
2*x₁ + 10*x₂ ≤ 200
x₁ >= 0 x₂ >= 0
From simplex method solver we get the answer
x₁ = 10 x₂ = 18 z = 2250
The linear programming model is:
Maximize [tex]\mathbf{Z = 90x + 75y}[/tex]Subject to [tex]\mathbf{3x + 2y \le 66}[/tex], [tex]\mathbf{9x + 4y \le 180}[/tex], [tex]\mathbf{2x + 10y \le 200}[/tex], [tex]\mathbf{x,y \ge 0}[/tex]Represent sofa with y and chairs with x.
The given parameters are:
Carpentry:
[tex]\mathbf{Chair =3\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Sofa =2\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Available = 66\ hours}[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{3x + 2y \le 66}[/tex]
Finishing
[tex]\mathbf{Chair =9\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Sofa =4\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Available = 180\ hours}[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{9x + 4y \le 180}[/tex]
Upholstery
[tex]\mathbf{Chair =2\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Sofa =10\ hours}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{Available = 200\ hours}[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{2x + 10y \le 200}[/tex]
The profit is given as: $90 per chair, and $75 per sofa.
So, the objective function is:
[tex]\mathbf{Z = 90x + 75y}[/tex]
Hence, the linear programming model is:
Maximize [tex]\mathbf{Z = 90x + 75y}[/tex]
Subject to
[tex]\mathbf{3x + 2y \le 66}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{9x + 4y \le 180}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{2x + 10y \le 200}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x,y \ge 0}[/tex]
Read more about linear programming model at:
https://brainly.com/question/13720072
What do you think the important skills necessary in solving problems in differential calculus?
Answer:
idk if this helps but here:
Cutoff points are a crucial piece of calculus and are among the main things that understudies find out about in a calculus class. So, finding the constraint of a capacity implies figuring out what esteem the capacity approaches as it draws nearer and more like a specific point.
Step-by-step explanation:
Write 257% as decimal
Answer:
please mark brainliest!
Step-by-step explanation:
2.57
Answer:
2.57
Hope this helps! Mark me brainliest
god bless!
CAN YOU PLS ANSWER THIS QUICK!!! WHAT IS THE ANSWER TO THIS MATH EQUATION??? GEOMETRY/COLLEGE!!!
20 points & Brainliest
Why are rotations a rigid motion?
Answer:
RC,\α is a rigid motion.
Here C, is the rotacenter which is the fixed point and around C all other points move in a fixed distance by the definition of rotation.
the motion follows in a circularmanner with C as the center.
consider a point Q which changes to Q1 after rotation by an angle\alpha
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering rotational motion and subsequently rotational mechanics every point on the body must have same angular velocity and angular acceleration. If the body is not rigid different points on the body will have different angular velocity and angular acceleration.
free brainlyest if answer 9+10 the right way
Answer:
19
Step-by-step explanation:
literally if this is wrong i swear
Answer:
19
Step-by-step explanation:
s x = –4 a valid solution this linear equation? 2x + 9(x – 1) = 8(2x + 2) – 5 No. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement. No. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement. Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement. Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement.
Answer:your answer is C!
Step-by-step explanation: I got it right
Answer:
c) Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement.
Step-by-step explanation:
i verified with my teacher may i plz get brainliest
#16 What is the product of
3.4 and 15.56?
Answer:
53.04
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
52.904
Step-by-step explanation:
A junior basketball player has a goal of scoring at least 1,000 points in his high-school career. His team plays twenty games per year, and after two years he has 320 points
plz i need help i promise i will mark brainliest
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
D
Rewrite it as a function and isolate Y.
Answer: y= -2x + 12
or f (y ) = 6 - [tex]\frac{y}{2}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
just subtract the 2x to get the y alone
Graph the line y=-1/3x+3
what is the solution to -3/4x + 2
Answer: 1/4x(3x+8)
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
let me know if its correct!!
Your cell phone plan is $40 per month plus $0.10 per minute for each minute over 300 minutes of call time. Your cell phone bill came to $110.00. How many mintes did you go over your alloted timed?
A composition of transformations maps pre-image EFGH to final image E"F"G"H".
Trapezoid E F G H is shifted down and to the left to trapezoid E prime F prime G prime H prime. Trapezoid E prime F prime G prime H prime is reflected across the line of reflection c to form trapezoid E double-prime F double-prime G double-prime H double-prime.
The first transformation for this composition is [________], and the second transformation is a reflection across line c.
a 180° rotation about point G
a 180° rotation about point H
a translation down and to the left
a translation up and to the right
Answer:
c. a translation down and to the left
Step-by-step explanation:
As per translation of a graph, the first transformation for this composition is translation down and to the left.
What is the translation of a graph?"A translation of a graph is its rigid movement, vertically or horizontally."
Here, A composition of transformations maps pre-image EFGH to final image E"F"G"H".
Trapezoid E F G H is shifted down and to the left to trapezoid E prime F prime G prime H prime.
Therefore, this transformation for this composition is translation down and to the left, and the second transformation is a reflection across line c.
Learn more about translation of a graph here: https://brainly.com/question/11788591
#SPJ3
Write a linear equation that passes through the points (1,-6) and (-3, 10) *
HAHAHA HELP PLS
y=-4x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y= -4x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
10- -6/-3-1
10+6/-3-1
16/-4
-4
Susan was supposed to use 5/4 of a cup of butter
in her recipe, but she only used 3/4 of a cup of butter.
a. What fraction of the butter that she should
have used did Susan actually use? Make a
math drawing to help you solve this problem
and explain your solution.
b. Describe the different unit amounts that occur
in part (a). Discuss how one amount can be de-
scribed with two different fractions depending
on what the unit amount is taken to be.
Answer:
[tex]a.\ \dfrac{3}{5}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
We can see the fractions [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] of cups.
It can be seen that denominator has 4 i.e. the fraction [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex].
Let us suppose, a unit is equal to [tex]\frac{1}4[/tex] of a cup.
Susan was supposed to use [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] of a cup.
i.e. 5 units of butter was to be used.
But, actual recipe has only 3 units of butter.
[tex]\text{Fraction of butter used} = \dfrac{\text{Units of butter used}}{\text{Unit of butter Susan was supposed to use}}[/tex]
a. [tex]\text{Fraction of butter used} = \dfrac{3}{5}[/tex]
Alternatively, we could have directly divided the given fractions:
[tex]\dfrac{\dfrac{3}{4}}{\dfrac{5}{4}} = \dfrac{3}{5}[/tex]
The fraction of the butter that she should have used did Susan actually use is :
Fractions =5/4 and 3/4 of cups.
Denominator = 4 i.e. the fraction 1/4
Let us suppose,
A unit is equal to 1/4 of a cup.
Susan was supposed to use 5/4 of a cup.
5 units of butter was to be used.
But, actual recipe has only 3 units of butter.
Fraction of butter used=unit of butter used/unit of butter
that was supposed to
be use
=3/4/5/4
=3/5
The fraction of the butter that she should have been used is 3/5.
Find out more information about "Fractions":
https://brainly.com/question/9047718referrer=searchResults