The heights of juniors at a certain high school have a mean of 65.5 inches, with a standard deviation of 3.5 inches. What is the probability that a randomly selected junior at this school is at least 72.5 inches tall

A minimum sample size of 62 is needed to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within 2 words of the true population mean, assuming a normal distribution of the number of words per sentence in the book and a population standard deviation of 4 words.

To determine the minimum sample size needed to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within 2 words of the true population mean, we can use the formula for the margin of error:

Margin of error = z * (standard deviation / sqrt(n))

Where z is the z-score for the desired confidence level, standard deviation is the population standard deviation (given as 4 words), and n is the sample size.

We want the margin of error to be no more than 2 words, so we can set up the inequality:

z * (4 / √n) ≤ 2

To find the value of z for 95% confidence level, we can use a z-table or calculator and find that z = 1.96.

Substituting this value into the inequality and solving for n, we get:

1.96 * (4 / √n) ≤ 2

Simplifying and solving for n, we get:

n >= 61.05

Since we can't have a fractional sample size, we can round up to the nearest whole number and conclude that a minimum sample size of 62 is needed to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within 2 words of the true population mean.

Learn more about standard deviation

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ4

The median of 14 is the most accurate to use since the data is skewed.

We have,

The median of 14 is the most accurate measure of center to use to represent the data.

This is because the data is skewed, with a cluster of values around 20, and only a few values in the lower ranges.

Using the mean would be heavily influenced by the few high values, which would make it appear as though the charity received more money than it actually did on average.

The median, on the other hand, is not as affected by extreme values and represents the value in the middle of the data set, which in this case is a better representation of the typical donation received by the charity.

Thus,

The median of 14 is the most accurate to use since the data is skewed.

Learn more about the median here:

https://brainly.com/question/28060453

#SPJ1

The value of the trigonometric ratio cosN in the right-angle triangle is 0.5.

A right-angled triangle is a triangle, that has one of its interior angles equal to 90 degrees or any one angle is a right angle.

To find the value of the trigonometric ratio cosN as in the right-angle triangle below, we use the formula below

Formula:

From the diagram,

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Learn more about right-angled triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/22790996

#SPJ1

The probability of having to try three or more times is = 431/46656.

To find the probability of having to try three or more times to get all three dice to show the same number, we need to consider the probabilities of different outcomes.

On the first roll, all three dice can show any number with equal probability, so the probability of not getting a match on the first roll is 1.

On the second roll, we want to calculate the probability of not getting a match again. There are two cases to consider:

Since we want to calculate the probability of having to try three or more times, we are interested in the event where we do not get a match on the first two rolls.

Therefore, the probability of this event is [tex](215/216)^2[/tex] = 46225/46656.

Thus, the probability of having to try three or more times is 1 - 46225/46656

= 431/46656.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The minimum surface area of the container is: 96.00 cm² in the given case.

Let's call the length and width of the square base "x", and the height of the container "h". Since the container has a volume of 256 cm^3, we can write:

V = [tex]x^2 * h = 256[/tex]

We want to minimize the surface area of the container, which consists of the area of the base plus the area of the four sides. The area of the base , and the area of each side is xh. Therefore, the total surface area of the container is:

A = [tex]x^2 + 4xh[/tex]

We can solve for h in terms of x using the volume equation:

h = [tex]256 / (x^2)[/tex]

Substituting this expression for h into the surface area equation, we get:

A(x) =

To find the minimum surface area, we need to find the critical points of the function A(x).

We can do this by taking the derivative of A(x) with respect to x, setting it equal to zero, and solving for x:

[tex]dA/dx = 2x - 1024 / x^2 = 0\\2x = 1024 / x^2\\x^3 = 512\\x = ∛512\\x ≈ 8.00 cm[/tex]

To confirm that this is a minimum, we can check the second derivative:

[tex]d^2A/dx^2 = 2 + 2048 / x^3[/tex]

This is positive, so A(x) has a minimum at x =[tex]∛512[/tex]. Therefore, the minimum surface area of the container is:   96.00 cm²

To learn more about surface area here

https://brainly.com/question/16519513

#SPJ4

To solve this problem, we'll use the concept of permutations.

First, we need to choose a woman for the position of president, then another woman for the position of vice president, and finally, a man for the treasurer position.

1. President: Since there are 20 women, we have 20 options for the president position.
2. Vice President: We're left with 19 women (since we already chose one for the president), so we have 19 options for the vice president position.
3. Treasurer: Since there are 17 men, we have 17 options for the treasurer position.

Now, multiply the number of options for each position together to find the total number of ways to form the committee:

20 (president) × 19 (vice president) × 17 (treasurer) = 6,460 ways.

So, there are 6,460 possible ways to choose three different members with women as president and vice president and a man as treasurer.

learn more about women here:brainly.com/question/928992

#SPJ11

The lawyer's expected gain can be calculated by multiplying the probability of winning by the potential gain if she wins, and subtracting the cost of preparing the case. The lawyer's expected gain in this discrimination suit is $7,000.

Expected gain = (probability of winning * potential gain) - cost of preparing the case
Expected gain = (.3 * $40,000) - $5,000
Expected gain = $12,000 - $5,000
Expected gain = $7,000
To calculate the expected gain for the lawyer in this discrimination suit, we need to consider the probabilities of winning and losing, as well as the associated monetary outcomes.
The probability of winning is 0.3, and if she wins, she makes $40,000. The probability of losing is 1 - 0.3 = 0.7, and she gets nothing in this case. Regardless of the outcome, she has to spend $5,000 preparing the case.
To calculate the expected gain, we multiply the probability of each outcome by its respective monetary value and then sum them up:
Expected gain = (0.3 * $40,000) - $5,000
Expected gain = ($12,000) - $5,000
Expected gain = $7,000
So, the lawyer's expected gain in this discrimination suit is $7,000.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The box will be more shallow than in the previous case, but it will still have the maximum possible volume for the given amount of material.

To find the dimensions of the box of greatest volume that can be constructed for $48, we need to use optimization. Let's start by assigning variables to the dimensions of the box. Let x be the length of one side of the square base, and let y be the height of the box.

The surface area of the box (including the base) is given by:

SA = x^2 + 4xy

The cost of the box is given by:

C = 3(x^2 + 4xy) + 4x^2

We want to maximize the volume of the box, which is given by:

V = x^2y

Now we have three equations:

SA = x^2 + 4xy
C = 3(x^2 + 4xy) + 4x^2
V = x^2y

We can use the cost equation to eliminate y:

C = 3(x^2 + 4xy) + 4x^2
48 = 3(x^2 + 4xy) + 4x^2
48 = 3x^2 + 12xy + 4x^2
48 = 7x^2 + 12xy
y = (48 - 7x^2) / (12x)

Now we can substitute this expression for y into the volume equation:

V = x^2y
V = x^2(48 - 7x^2) / (12x)
V = (4x^2 - 7x^4) / 12

We want to maximize V, so we take the derivative and set it equal to zero:

dV/dx = (8x - 28x^3) / 12
0 = (8x - 28x^3) / 12
0 = 8x - 28x^3
28x^3 = 8x
x = sqrt(2/7)

Now we can use this value of x to find y:

y = (48 - 7x^2) / (12x)
y = (48 - 7(2/7)) / (12(sqrt(2/7)))
y = (336/7 - 2) / (12(sqrt(2/7)))
y = 2(sqrt(2/7))

Therefore, the dimensions of the box of greatest volume that can be constructed for $48 are:

x = sqrt(2/7) meters
y = 2(sqrt(2/7)) meters

And the maximum volume is:

V = (4x^2 - 7x^4) / 12
V = (4(2/7) - 7(2/7)^2) / 12
V = 8/21 cubic meters

Note that we have assumed that the carpenter can use any amount of material up to $48. If the carpenter is required to use exactly $48 of material, then the answer will be slightly different. In that case, the dimensions of the box will be:

x = 2(sqrt(2/7)) meters
y = (48 - 7x^2) / (12x)
y = 2(sqrt(2/7)) meters

And the maximum volume will be:

V = x^2y
V = 2/7 cubic meters

Know more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/13338592

#SPJ11

68% of all students at a college still need to take another math class. Let's calculate the probability that out of 49 randomly selected students, at least 30 of them still need to take another math class.

To find the probability, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes (students who still need to take another math class) and the total number of possible outcomes (total number of students in the sample).

Given that 68% of all students still need to take another math class, the probability that an individual student needs to take another math class is 0.68.

Let's denote:

p = probability that a student needs to take another math class (0.68)

q = probability that a student does not need to take another math class (1 - 0.68 = 0.32)

We can use the binomial probability formula to calculate the probability of at least 30 students needing another math class out of a sample of 49 students:

P(X ≥ 30) = P(X = 30) + P(X = 31) + ... + P(X = 49)

where X is the number of students needing another math class.

Using the binomial probability formula:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * q^(n-k)

where C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient (n choose k), n is the total number of trials (49), and k is the number of successful outcomes (students needing another math class).

Now we can calculate the probability:

P(X ≥ 30) = P(X = 30) + P(X = 31) + ... + P(X = 49)

= Σ [C(49, k) * p^k * q^(49-k)] for k = 30 to 49

Calculating this sum can be computationally intensive. However, we can use statistical software or calculators to find the exact value of this probability.

In summary, to find the probability that at least 30 students out of a random sample of 49 students still need to take another math class, we can use the binomial probability formula. By calculating the sum of probabilities for all favorable outcomes, we can determine the desired probability.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer would be #3

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming Albert doesn't pay it off in full, he would be charged $1.48 in interest for this billing period.

To find the interest which too is charged for every day, we need to find the daily periodic rate.

The daily periodic  rate can be found by dividing the APR by the number of days in a year which is:

[tex]20.7\% /365 =0.00056849315[/tex]

So with the help of the daily periodic rate we can calculate the interest charged for each day:

[tex]Days 1-3: \$50 * 0.00056849315 * 3 = $0.0852749725\\Days 4-10: \$100 * 0.00056849315 * 7 = $0.0398214543\\Days 11-25: \$175 * 0.00056849315 * 15 = $1.2925681162\\Days 26-30: \$225 * 0.00056849315 * 5 = $0.0646242018\\[/tex]

The total interest charged during the entire billing period is:

Total interest charged = $0.0852749725 + $0.0398214543 + $1.2925681162 + $0.0646242018

= $1.4822887448

So assuming Albert doesn't pay it off in full, he would be charged $1.48 in interest for this billing period.

Learn more about the billing period at:

https://brainly.com/question/30413485

Please find the attached image for the data used to calculate the required answer.

#SPJ1

There are 720 unique ways to award the gold, silver, and bronze medals to the top three participants in this contest.

The number of unique ways to award the gold, silver, and bronze medals can be determined by using the concept of permutations. A permutation is an arrangement of objects in a specific order. In this case, we need to find the number of permutations of 10 participants for the top three positions.

The number of permutations of 10 participants for the gold medal can be calculated as 10P1, which is equal to 10. This means that there are 10 different participants who can receive the gold medal.

Once the gold medalist is determined, there are only 9 participants remaining for the silver medal. The number of permutations of 9 participants for the silver medal can be calculated as 9P1, which is equal to 9. This means that there are 9 different participants who can receive the silver medal after the gold medalist is determined.

Finally, once the gold and silver medalists are determined, there are only 8 participants remaining for the bronze medal. The number of permutations of 8 participants for the bronze medal can be calculated as 8P1, which is equal to 8. This means that there are 8 different participants who can receive the bronze medal after the gold and silver medalists are determined.

To determine the total number of unique ways to award the medals, we need to multiply the number of permutations of each medal. Therefore, the total number of unique ways to award the medals is equal to:

10P1 x 9P1 x 8P1 = 10 x 9 x 8 = 720

Therefore, there are 720 unique ways to award the gold, silver, and bronze medals to the 10 participants in this contest.

To know more about ways, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/9146030#

#SPJ11

a) If and are even integers, then is an even integer. True

b)  If is an even integer, then and are both even integers. True

c) A counterexample is. We have, but. Therefore, the statement is false.

(a) True. Let and be even integers. Then there exist integers and such that and . Then,

Since and are even, they can be written as for some integer . Then, we have

= 2(2k1 + 2k2) = 2(2(k1 + k2))

which shows that is even. Therefore, the statement is true.

(b) True. Let be an even integer. Then, by definition, there exists an integer such that . This implies that is divisible by 2. Since is divisible by 2, we can write as for some integer . Then, we have

[tex]= (2k)^2 = 4k^2[/tex]

which is an even integer. Therefore, and are both even integers. Therefore, the statement is true.

(c) False. A counterexample is. We have, but. Therefore, the statement is false.

Learn more about integers,

https://brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ4

The maximum and minimum of f subject to the constraints are both 2, and they occur at the critical point (0,0,0).

To solve this problem, we can use Lagrange multipliers. Let's define the function:

f(x,y,z) = 2

And the two constraints:

g(x,y,z) = 4x - 3y = 0

h(x,y,z) = 2x^2 - y^2 - z = 0

We want to find the values of x, y, and z that maximize or minimize f while satisfying the two constraints. To do this, we set up the Lagrangian:

L(x,y,z,λ,μ) = f(x,y,z) - λg(x,y,z) - μh(x,y,z)

Where λ and μ are Lagrange multipliers. Then we take the partial derivatives of L with respect to x, y, z, λ, and μ and set them equal to zero:

∂L/∂x = 0: 4λx + 4μx = 0
∂L/∂y = 0: -3λy - 2μy = 0
∂L/∂z = 0: -μ = 0
∂L/∂λ = 0: 4x - 3y = 0
∂L/∂μ = 0: 2x^2 - y^2 - z = 0

Solving for μ, we get μ = 0. Then we can use the first two equations to solve for λ and y:

4λx = -4μx
-3λy = 2μy

4λx = 0, so either λ = 0 or x = 0. If λ = 0, then we get y = 0 from the second equation. But this doesn't satisfy the constraint 4x - 3y = 0, so we must have x = 0. Then the constraint gives us y = 0 as well. Plugging these into the last equation, we get z = 0. So the only critical point is (0,0,0), and f(0,0,0) = 2.

Now we need to check the boundary points. From the second constraint, we can solve for y in terms of x and z:

y = ±√(2x^2 - z)

If z < 0, then there are no real solutions for y, so we can ignore those cases. If z = 0, then we get y = ±√2x^2. Plugging this into the first constraint, we get:

4x - 3(±√2x^2) = 0
x = ±3/4√2

So the boundary points are (3/4√2, √2/2, 0) and (-3/4√2, -√2/2, 0). Plugging these into f, we get:

f(3/4√2, √2/2, 0) = 2
f(-3/4√2, -√2/2, 0) = 2

Know more about constraints here:

https://brainly.com/question/30703729

#SPJ11

The side opposite angle E will be the same size as the side opposite

angle F.

We have,

Since angles E and F have the same measure, we know that the sides opposite these angles will have the same length.

This is because of the following theorem:

If two angles in a triangle have the same measure, then the sides opposite those angles are congruent (i.e., have the same length).

Therefore,

The side opposite angle E will be the same size as the side opposite

angle F.

Learn more about triangles here:

https://brainly.com/question/25950519

#SPJ1

The standard error is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean or proportion.

When we take a sample from a population, the mean or proportion of that sample may differ from the true mean or proportion of the population.

Know more about the  standard error

https://brainly.com/question/29037921

#SPJ11

Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. You are given the velocity function: v(t) = 6 + e^(-2t)
2. To find the position function s(t), we need to integrate the velocity function with respect to t.
3. Integrate v(t) with respect to t: ∫(6 + e^(-2t)) dt
4. Apply the rules of integration: ∫6 dt + ∫e^(-2t) dt
5. Integrate each term separately: 6t - (1/2)e^(-2t) + C
6. The position function s(t) is: s(t) = 6t - (1/2)e^(-2t) + C

In the position function s(t) = 6t - (1/2)e^(-2t) + C, C is the integration constant, which depends on the initial position. If you are given an initial condition, you can determine the value of C. Otherwise, the position function will remain in this general form.

To learn more about Position function - brainly.com/question/28939258

#SPJ11

MaryAnn and Nana's surveys will provide them with quantitative data, which is numerical data that can be measured and analyzed using mathematical or statistical methods.

Quantitative data refers to numerical information that can be measured and expressed in terms of numbers or quantities. It is often obtained through structured research methods such as surveys, experiments, and statistical analyses. This type of data is objective, reliable, and precise, and can be easily analyzed using statistical techniques.

Quantitative data can be divided into two main categories: discrete data and continuous data. Discrete data can only take specific values, such as the number of people in a room or the number of cars in a parking lot. Continuous data, on the other hand, can take any value within a certain range, such as height, weight, or temperature. Quantitative data can provide valuable insights into patterns, trends, and relationships between variables, making it an essential tool for decision-making in various fields, including business, science, and social research.

To learn more about Quantitative data visit here:

brainly.com/question/14810759

#SPJ4

A sequence {an} is monotone increasing if its values increase or remain constant as the index increases; a monotone increasing sequence that is bounded above converges to its supremum, due to the fact that it eventually "runs out of room" to increase and cannot "overshoot" its limit.

We understand monotone increasing sequences and their convergence properties.
A sequence {an} is said to be monotone increasing if each term in the sequence is greater than or equal to the previous term, meaning that for any two indices n and m, if n < m, then an ≤ am.

In other words, the sequence does not decrease; it either stays the same or increases as you move from one term to the next.
Now, let's discuss why a monotone increasing sequence that is bounded converges.
First, a sequence is bounded if there is an upper bound, which means that there exists a real number M such that an ≤ M for all n. In the case of a monotone increasing sequence, this means that the sequence will never exceed the value M.

Next, consider the set of all the terms in the sequence {an}.

Since the sequence is bounded and monotone increasing, this set will have a least upper bound (or supremum), denoted by L.

This means that L is the smallest value such that an ≤ L for all n.

Finally, we'll show that the sequence converges to L.

By the definition of the least upper bound, for any positive number ε > 0, there exists an index N such that L - ε < aN. Now, since the sequence is monotone increasing, for all n ≥ N, we have aN ≤ an ≤ L.
Thus, for all n ≥ N, we have L - ε < an ≤ L, which implies that the sequence converges to L.

So, a monotone increasing sequence that is bounded converges.

For similar question on converges.

https://brainly.com/question/30583079

#SPJ11

The distance across the lake is 171.82 feet.

Let x be the distance Marcy rowed

Let d be the distance between Marcy's ending point and her father's starting point

Using trigonometry, we can find the value of "d":

Recall, SOH-CAH-TOA

We can use TOA which is Opposite/Adjacent

tan(2°) = 6 / d

d = 6 / tan(2°)

d = 6/0.03492

d = 171.82feet

Learn more about word problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/13818690

#SPJ1

The design described is known as a quasi-experimental design.

In a true experimental design, subjects are randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group, and the experimental stimulus is administered to the experimental group while the control group does not receive the stimulus. This allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships between the independent and dependent variables.

However, in a quasi-experimental design, the researcher does not randomly assign subjects to groups. Instead, the experimental stimulus is administered to the experimental group, and then the dependent variable is measured in both the experimental and control groups.

Because the groups are not randomly assigned, it is more difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships between the independent and dependent variables.

Quasi-experimental designs are often used when random assignment is not feasible or ethical, such as in studies of naturally occurring groups or in studies where subjects have already been exposed to a stimulus.

While these designs may not provide the same level of control as true experimental designs, they can still provide valuable insights into the relationships between variables.

To know more about quasi-experimental design, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28139463#

#SPJ11

We can see here that a complex number can be geometrically represented as a point in the complex plane, with the horizontal axis standing for the real part and the vertical axis for the imaginary part.

A basic mathematical theorem relating to the sides of a right triangle is known as the Pythagorean Theorem.

|z| = √(a² + b²) - This equation demonstrates that a complex number's magnitude is equal to the Pythagorean Theorem.

We can then see here the Pythagorean Theorem, which determines the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle, is comparable to the magnitude of a complex number.

Learn more about Pythagorean Theorem on https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

The probability that the mean of a sample of 7777 computers would be less than 82.59 months is 100%, or close to 1.

The probability that the mean of a sample of 7777 computers would be less than 82.5982.59 months, assuming a mean life of 80 months and a variance of 6464, can be calculated using the central limit theorem and the standard normal distribution.

First, we calculate the standard error of the mean using the formula:

standard error of the mean = σ/√n

where σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size.

Here, σ² = 6464, so σ = √6464 = 80.3

n = 7777

standard error of the mean = 80.3/√7777 ≈ 0.907

Next, we calculate the z-score using the formula:

z = ([tex]\bar{x}[/tex] - μ) / (σ/√n)

where [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size.

Here, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 82.59, μ = 80, σ = 80.3, n = 7777

z = (82.59 - 80) / (80.3/√7777) ≈ 8.6

We find that the probability of z being less than 8.6 is very close to 1, or 100%.

To know more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The median is the best measure of center because there are outliers present.

The 1,000 mL of D5 1/2 NS solution contains 50 grams of sugar.

To calculate the grams of sugar in the solution, we need to know the concentration of sugar in the solution, usually measured in grams per milliliter (g/mL) or grams per liter (g/L).

The information provided in the problem tells us that we have a solution of "D5 1/2 NS," which stands for "Dextrose 5% in 0.45% Normal Saline." This is an intravenous (IV) solution commonly used in medicine. It contains 5 grams of dextrose (a type of sugar) per 100 mL of solution and 0.45 grams of sodium chloride (salt) per 100 mL of solution.

To calculate the concentration of sugar in the solution, we can use the following conversion factor:

1% = 1 gram per 100 mL

Therefore, the concentration of sugar in the D5 1/2 NS solution is:

5% = 5 grams per 100 mL

To calculate the total amount of sugar in the 1,000 mL of solution, we can use the following formula:

(total sugar in grams) = (volume of solution in mL) x (concentration of sugar in g/100mL)

Substituting the given values, we get:

(total sugar in grams) = (1,000 mL) x (5 g/100mL)

(total sugar in grams) = 50 grams

To learn more about solution here:

https://brainly.com/question/24090866

#SPJ1

Using the doubling time and exponential growth formulae, the population of annual plants will be 4,000 after 42 years, assuming a constant rate of increase and an initial population size of 500.

To answer your question, we will use the doubling time formula and exponential growth formula. Given that the doubling time of a population of annual plants is 14 years, the initial size is 500, and we want to know the population size after 42 years, we can follow these steps:

1. Determine the number of doubling times within 42 years: Since the doubling time is 14 years, we can calculate the number of doubling times by dividing the total time (42 years) by the doubling time (14 years):
  Number of doubling times = 42 / 14 = 3

2. Calculate the growth factor using the doubling time: In exponential growth, the population size increases by a growth factor. Since the population doubles in 14 years, the growth factor (g) is 2 (doubled).

3. Apply the exponential growth formula: The formula for exponential growth is P(t) = P0 * g^t, where P(t) is the population size at time t, P0 is the initial population size, g is the growth factor, and t is the number of doubling times.

4. Plug in the given values and solve for P(t): We know the initial population size (P0) is 500, the growth factor (g) is 2, and the number of doubling times (t) is 3. So the formula becomes:
  P(t) = 500 * 2^3

5. Calculate the population size after 42 years: P(t) = 500 * 8 = 4000

In conclusion, using the doubling time and exponential growth formulae, the population of annual plants will be 4,000 after 42 years, assuming a constant rate of increase and an initial population size of 500.

To learn more about exponential growth formulae, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13877030#

#SPJ11

Randomly grouping participants into two groups and testing the effects of a product would utilize a randomized controlled trial (RCT) research design.

In an randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants are randomly assigned to different groups, with one group receiving the product (treatment group) and the other group not receiving the product (control group).

This design allows for the comparison of the effects of the product by evaluating the differences between the treatment and control groups.

Random assignment helps minimize bias and ensures that any observed differences are more likely due to the product's effects rather than other factors.

Therefore, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study strategy would be used to divide volunteers into two groups at random and examine the effects of

Learn more about randomized controlled trial

brainly.com/question/14209363

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(1)

Given vertices are A(3,4), B(2,-1) and C(4,-6).

We need to calculate the length of the sides AB,BC,AC.

We have to distance formula which can tell the distance between 2 points.

d = √(x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2.

(1)

AB = √(2 - 3)^2 + (-1 - 4)^2

    = √(-1)^2 + (5)^2

    = √1 + 25

    = √26.

(2)

BC = √(4 - 2)^2 + (-6 + 1)^2

    = √(2)^2 + (5)^2

    = √4 + 25

    = √29

(3)

AC = √(4 - 3)^2 + (-6 - 4)^2

    = √(1)^2 + (-10)^2

    = √1 + 100

    = √101

Therefore, the length of the sides of the triangle are √26,√29 and √101.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2)

Let the given points be A(2,-2), B(-2,1) and C(5,2).

Using the distance formula,w e find that

⇒ AB = √(-2 - 2)^2 + (1 + 2)^2

        = √16 + 9

        = √25.

⇒ BC = √(5 + 2)^2 + (2 - 1)^2

         = √49 + 1

         = √50.

⇒ AC = √(5 - 2)^2 + (2 + 2)^2

         = √9 + 16

         = √25.

Now,

⇒ AB^2 + AC^2

⇒ (5)^2 + (5)^2

⇒ 25 + 25

⇒ 50.

⇒ (BC)^2.

Therefore, AB^2 + AC^2 = BC^2.

∴ We can conclude that ΔABC is a right angled triangle

The order in which the matrices should be arranged is: I, IV, III, II.

To solve the system of equations, Tia used row operations to transform the augmented matrix, which consists of the coefficients of the variables and the constants, into an equivalent matrix in row echelon form. The matrices she noted correspond to the augmented matrix at different steps during the row operations.

To determine the order in which the matrices should be arranged when solving the system from start to finish, we need to follow the sequence of row operations performed by Tia. We can determine this sequence by examining the changes in the matrices.

Starting matrix:

-1 -1 2 -7

2 1 1 2

-3 2 3 -7

I: Add Row 1 to Row 2:

1 0 2 -5

2 1 1 2

-3 2 3 -7

II: Add -2 times Row 1 to Row 3:

1 0 2 -5

2 1 1 2

0 2 -1 3

III: Add -2 times Row 2 to Row 3:

1 0 2 -5

2 1 1 2

0 0 -3 -4

IV: Multiply Row 3 by -1/3:

1 0 2 -5

2 1 1 2

0 0 1 4/3

V: Add -2 times Row 3 to Row 2:

1 0 2 -5

2 1 0 -2/3

0 0 1 4/3

VI: Add -2 times Row 2 to Row 1:

1 0 0 -1/3

0 1 0 -2/3

0 0 1 4/3

The final matrix corresponds to the row echelon form of the augmented matrix. The solution of the system can be obtained by back-substitution, starting from the last equation and working upwards.

To learn more about matrices here:

https://brainly.com/question/11367104

#SPJ1

The supplement has a statistically significant effect on running speed at a significance level of 0.05 (since the p-value is less than 0.05).

To find the two-sided p-value for the corresponding paired t-test, we need to use the information given in the paper. The paper reported that running speed improved by an average of 2 seconds/mile with a 90% confidence interval for the mean of 0.1 to 3.9 seconds/mile. To calculate the two-sided p-value, we need to assume that the null hypothesis is that the supplement has no effect on running speed. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is that the supplement does have an effect on running speed. Using a t-test, we can calculate the t-statistic as (2 - 0) / (0.9 / sqrt(10)) = 7.95 (where 0 is the hypothesized mean improvement in running speed and 0.9 is the standard error of the mean based on the confidence interval given). Using a t-distribution table with 9 degrees of freedom (n-1), we can find that the probability of getting a t-statistic greater than or equal to 7.95 (or less than or equal to -7.95) is less than 0.001.
Since this is a two-sided test, we need to double this probability to get the two-sided p-value, which is less than 0.002. Therefore, we can conclude that the supplement has a statistically significant effect on running speed at a significance level of 0.05 (since the p-value is less than 0.05).

Learn more about statistically here

https://brainly.com/question/14724376

#SPJ11