In how many ways can 6 girls and 2 boys sit in a row if the 2 boys insist on sitting next to each other

Answer: (-2i+ √5)(-21-√-5) simplifies to -19√5 + 42i - 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the expression (-2i+ √5)(-21-√-5), we can first use the distributive property to expand the product:

(-2i)(-21) + (-2i)(-√-5) + (√5)(-21) + (√5)(-√-5)

Simplifying each term, we get:

42i + 2i√-5 - 21√5 - √25

Note that √-5 can be written as √(-1)√5 = i√5, using the fact that √-1 = i. Also, √25 = 5, so we can substitute these values to get:

42i + 2i√5 - 21√5 - 5

Combining like terms, we have:

(2i√5 - 21√5) + (42i - 5)

-19√5 + 42i - 5

To find the sample proportion of teenagers 13 to 17 years of age who use social media, we need to divide the number of teenagers who said they use social media by the total sample size. In this case, we know that "of those surveyed, stated that they do use social media." However, we don't know the total sample size, so we cannot calculate the exact proportion.

If we had the total sample size, we could divide the number of teenagers who use social media by the total sample size to get the sample proportion. For example, if the sample size was 200, and stated that they use social media, the sample proportion would be 0.55 (55%).


Step 1: Identify the total number of teenagers surveyed (n) and the number of teenagers who stated they use social media (x).

Step 2: Calculate the sample proportion by dividing the number of teenagers who use social media (x) by the total number of teenagers surveyed (n).

Sample proportion (p) = x / n

Unfortunately, you didn't provide the specific values for "n" and "x." Please provide the values for "n" and "x" so that I can help you calculate the sample proportion of teenagers aged 13 to 17 who use social media.

Learn more about survey here : brainly.com/question/17373064

#SPJ11

Answer:

The median is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.5.

Step-by-step explanation:

It’s asking for the center or median rather than average or mean. Count how many dots in total, split in half, and find the center number.

Answer:

The median is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , (3) , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 10

The number in the middle is 3.

The diameter of the base of the cone is 8 inches, which means that the radius is 4 inches (since radius is half of the diameter).

The height of the cone is twice the radius, which means the height is 2 x 4 = 8 inches.

To find the volume of the cone, we use the formula V = (1/3)πr^2h, where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height.

Substituting the values we found, we get:

V = (1/3)π(4^2)(8)

V = (1/3)π(16)(8)

V = (1/3)π(128)

V = 42.67 cubic inches (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the volume of the cone is approximately 42.67 cubic inches.

The probability that the call arrived when the switchboard was not fully busy, given that it arrived at random within the one-minute interval, is P(B) or 7/12.

The probability that the call arrived when the switchboard was not fully busy can be calculated using the concept of conditional probability. Let's define the event A as the call arriving during the 25-second period when the switchboard was fully busy, and event B as the call arriving during the remaining 35-second period when the switchboard was not fully busy. Since the call arrived at random within a one-minute interval, the probability of event A happening is 25/60 or 5/12 (25 seconds out of 60 seconds).
The probability of event B happening can be calculated as the complement of event A, which is 1 - 5/12 or 7/12 (35 seconds out of 60 seconds).
Therefore, the probability that the call arrived when the switchboard was not fully busy, given that it arrived at random within the one-minute interval, is P(B) or 7/12.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

Answer: 16 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Use ratios to solve:

125 m -> 25 cm

80 m -> x cm

Find the value of x:

x = 80*25/125 = 16

Hope this helps!

The length of the building on the scale drawing is 16 centimeters.

To determine the length of the building on the scale drawing in centimeters, we first need to establish the scale factor. Since the actual height of the building is 125 meters and its representation on the scale drawing is 25 centimeters, we can find the scale factor by dividing the height on the scale drawing by the actual height:

Scale factor = (Height on scale drawing) / (Actual height) = 25 cm / 125 m

As there are 100 centimeters in a meter, we need to convert the actual height to centimeters:

125 m * 100 = 12,500 cm

Now, we can recalculate the scale factor:

Scale factor = 25 cm / 12,500 cm = 1/500

This means that every 1 centimeter on the scale drawing represents 500 centimeters (or 5 meters) in reality. Now that we know the scale factor, we can use it to find the length of the building on the scale drawing:

Length on scale drawing = (Actual length) * (Scale factor) = 80 m * (1/500)

First, convert the actual length to centimeters:

80 m * 100 = 8,000 cm

Now, multiply by the scale factor:

Length on scale drawing = 8,000 cm * (1/500) = 16 cm

So, the length of the building on the scale drawing is 16 centimeters.

In summary, we can use the scale factor to convert between the actual measurements and the measurements on the scale drawing.

To know more about scale drawing, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28651690#

#SPJ11

The R-squared value, check for collinearity, test for the significance of the beta coefficients, interpret the meaning of the estimated coefficient for Fitness Center, and use the multiple regression model to predict the rent price for a 1-bedroom apartment in Sacramento Area.

To predict the rent price for a 1-bedroom apartment in Sacramento Area, we can use the multiple regression model on the Sacramento Apartment dataset. This model considers the availability of Fitness Center, Parking Space, and Wireless Internet as predictors.
First, we need to check the performance of the model. The R-squared value indicates the proportion of variance in the rent price that is explained by the predictors. A higher R-squared value indicates a better performance of the model. If the R-squared value is close to 1, it means that the model explains almost all the variability in the rent price. Therefore, we need to calculate the R-squared value to determine if this is a high-performance model.
Second, we need to check if there is a collinearity problem with the model. Collinearity occurs when the predictor variables are highly correlated with each other, which can lead to unreliable estimates of the regression coefficients. We can check the correlation matrix to detect any high correlations between the predictor variables.
Third, we need to check the significance of the estimated betas. The t-test can be used to determine if the estimated beta coefficients are significantly different from zero. A significant beta coefficient indicates that the corresponding predictor variable has a significant effect on the rent price. The magnitude and sign of the beta coefficient indicate the direction and strength of the relationship between the predictor variable and the rent price.
Regarding the estimated coefficient for Fitness Center, a positive coefficient would indicate that the presence of a fitness center is associated with higher rent prices, while a negative coefficient would indicate the opposite. We can interpret the meaning of the estimated coefficient by looking at its magnitude and sign.
Finally, we can use the multiple regression model to predict the rent price for a 1-bedroom apartment in Sacramento Area with the given predictor variables. By plugging in the values for Fitness Center, Parking Space, and Wireless Internet, we can obtain an estimate of the rent price for the apartment.

Learn more about regression here

https://brainly.com/question/17004137

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the least expensive can are: height = 4/(πr^2) = ∞, radius = 0, and the top and bottom are flat disks.

For the dimensions of the least expensive can, we will first express the volume and surface area in terms of the radius and height, and then minimize the cost function using calculus. Let r be the radius and h be the height of the can.

1. Volume (V) = πr^2h = 4 cubic inches (given)
2. Surface area (A) = 2πrh (side) + 2πr^2 (top and bottom)

Since the cost per square inch of constructing the metal top and bottom is twice the cost per square inch of constructing the cardboard side, let's denote the cost per square inch of the side as c. Then, the cost per square inch of the top and bottom is 2c.

Cost (C) = c(2πrh) + 2c(2πr^2) = 2cπr(2r + h)

Now, we need to eliminate one of the variables, either r or h. From the volume equation, we can express h in terms of r:
h = 4/(πr^2)

This tells us that A = 0, which doesn't make sense. So we can conclude that A should be as small as possible, which means it should be 0. This makes the top and bottom of the can flat, so they don't contribute to the cost of construction.

Now we can minimize the cost with respect to r. To do this, we take the derivative of Cost with respect to r and set it equal to 0:

d(Cost)/dr = -8C/r^2 = 0

Substitute this expression for h in the cost equation:

C = 2cπr[2r + (4/(πr^2))]

To minimize the cost, we will find the derivative of C with respect to r and set it to 0:

dC/dr = 2cπ[2 - (8/r^3)] = 0

Now, solve for r:

2 - (8/r^3) = 0
2 = 8/r^3
r^3 = 4
r = ∛4

Now, find the height (h) using the volume equation:

h = 4/(π(∛4)^2)
h = 4/(4π)

The dimensions of the least expensive can are:
Radius (r) = ∛4 inches
Height (h) = 4/(4π) inches

Learn more about Dimension:

brainly.com/question/31156956

#SPJ11

The value of x from the given right triangle is 10 units.

Consider triangle ABC and triangle BDC.

Here, ∠ABC=∠BDC=90°

∠BCD=∠BCA (Reflexive angle)

By AA similarity ΔABC is similar to ΔBDC

We know that, when two triangles are similar their corresponding sides will be in ratio.

Now, x/20 = 5/x

x²=100

x=√100

x=10 units

Therefore, the value of x from the given right triangle is 10 units.

To learn more about the similar triangles visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25882965.

#SPJ1

The directional derivative of a function f(x, y) at a point (a, b) in the direction of a unit vector u = ⟨cosθ, sinθ⟩ is given by the dot product of the gradient of f at (a, b) and the unit vector u.

That is, D_uf(a, b) = ∇f(a, b) · u

Here, f(x, y) = xy^3 - x^2, so ∇f(x, y)

= ⟨y^3 - 2x, 3xy^2⟩.

At the point (1, 4), we have ∇f(1, 4) = ⟨60, 192⟩.

The direction indicated by the angle theta = π/3 is u = ⟨cos(π/3), sin(π/3)⟩ = ⟨1/2, √3/2⟩.

Therefore, the directional derivative of f at (1, 4) in the direction of u is:

D_uf(1, 4) = ∇f(1, 4) · u

= ⟨60, 192⟩ · ⟨1/2, √3/2⟩

= 60/2 + 192(√3/2)

= 30 + 96√3

So the directional derivative of f at (1, 4) in the direction of θ = π/3 is 30 + 96√3.

Learn more about derivative, here:

brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen miniature Tootsie Roll will weigh more than 3.50 grams is 0.1587 or 16%.

The probability of a randomly chosen miniature Tootsie Roll weighing more than 3.50 grams can be determined through statistical analysis.

To do this, we need to consider the mean and standard deviation of the weight of Tootsie Rolls.

Assuming that the weight of Tootsie Rolls follows a normal distribution, we can use the z-score formula to find the probability of a randomly chosen Tootsie Roll weighing more than 3.50 grams.

The formula for calculating the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the observed weight, μ is the mean weight, and σ is the standard deviation.

Let's assume that the mean weight of miniature Tootsie Rolls is 3 grams and the standard deviation is 0.5 grams.

To find the z-score for a weight of 3.5 grams, we can plug in the values:

z = (3.5 - 3) / 0.5
z = 1

Using a z-score table, we can find that the probability of a z-score of 1 (or a Tootsie Roll weighing more than 3.5 grams) is 0.1587.

Therefore, the probability of a randomly chosen miniature Tootsie Roll weighing more than 3.50 grams is 0.1587 or approximately 16%.

It is important to note that this is an estimate based on assumptions about the distribution of Tootsie Roll weights. The actual probability may differ depending on factors such as batch variability, production methods, and storage conditions.

know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

Any value calculated from this survey would be considered a statistic.

To determine whether the given value is a statistic or a parameter, consider the following:

A statistic is a numerical value calculated from a sample of the population, while a parameter is a numerical value that describes a characteristic of the entire population.

In this case, the health and fitness club surveys 40 members. This is a sample of the population, not the entire population.

Know more about statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/31577270

#SPJ11

To calculate the required exit size, we need to first determine the total valuation of the company at the time of exit. Assuming a 50% dilution before exit, the post-money valuation would be $20M (50% of $40M).

To justify a $10M investment for a 28% ownership, the pre-money valuation would need to be $25M ($10M / 0.28). This means the total valuation at exit would need to be $45M ($25M + $20M).

Next, we need to calculate the probability-weighted expected return. Given a 20% probability of success, the expected return would be 20% x $45M = $9M.

Finally, we can use the expected return and the required return of 15% to determine the exit size needed to justify the investment. Using the formula: Exit size = expected return / (1 - required return), we get:

Exit size = $9M / (1 - 15%) = $10.59M

Therefore, the exit size would need to be at least $10.59M to justify a $10M investment for a 28% ownership with the given parameters.
Hi, I'd be happy to help with your question. To determine how large an exit has to be to justify a $10M investment for a 28% ownership, we'll need to consider the following terms: investment amount, ownership percentage, time horizon, dilution, probability of success, and required return for limited partners. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Calculate the initial post-money valuation: Divide the investment amount ($10M) by the ownership percentage (28%).
  Initial post-money valuation = $10M / 0.28 ≈ $35.71M

2. Account for the 50% dilution before exit: Multiply the initial post-money valuation by 2.
  Post-dilution valuation = $35.71M * 2 = $71.43M

3. Adjust for the probability of success: Divide the post-dilution valuation by the probability of success (20%).
  Adjusted valuation = $71.43M / 0.20 = $357.14M

4. Determine the future exit valuation based on the required return for limited partners: Use the formula Future Value (FV) = Present Value (PV) * (1 + r)^n, where r is the required return (15%) and n is the time horizon (use the midpoint of 5-7 years, so n = 6).
  Future exit valuation = $357.14M * (1 + 0.15)^6 ≈ $906.53M

So, to justify a $10M investment for a 28% ownership with the given parameters, the exit has to be approximately $906.53M.

To know more about valuation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30324334

#SPJ11

Larger balances are more significant and material to the financial statements, and therefore require more scrutiny.

Confirming a sample of other accounts in addition to the largest balances provides coverage of the remaining population and helps to reduce the risk of material misstatement.

The approach for confirming accounts payable is most likely to be "Selecting the accounts with the largest balances at year-end, plus a sample of other accounts."

The most common approach is to select a sample of accounts for confirmation rather than confirming all accounts.

This approach is cost-effective and efficient, while still providing reasonable assurance that the accounts are accurate and complete.

There are various methods to select the sample of accounts, and the most appropriate approach depends on the circumstances of the engagement.

One approach is to select the accounts with the largest balances at year-end, as these are generally the most significant and material.

Additionally, a sample of other accounts can also be selected to ensure that a representative sample is obtained.

Another approach is to select the accounts of companies with whom the client has previously done the most business.

This approach can help to identify any potential issues with key suppliers or customers and ensure that the accounts with the greatest impact on the financial statements are confirmed.

A random sample of accounts payable at year-end can also be selected. This approach ensures that the sample is unbiased and provides a representative view of the population.

It may not be as effective as the other approaches mentioned above in identifying any potential issues with significant accounts.

Ultimately, the approach taken will depend on the specific circumstances of the engagement and the risks identified.

To ensure that the sample selected is appropriate and provides sufficient coverage of the accounts payable population to obtain reasonable assurance about the accuracy and completeness of the accounts.

For similar questions on Balance

https://brainly.com/question/23447356

#SPJ11

Thus, there is a 62.5% chance of getting at least one Canadian quarter when seven quarters are randomly picked from the bag.

To find the probability of getting at least one Canadian quarter when picking seven quarters from the bag, we can use complementary probability. This means we can find the probability of not getting any Canadian quarters and subtract it from 1.

The total number of quarters in the bag is 50.

The probability of getting at least one Canadian quarter out of seven quarters can be calculated as the complement of the probability of getting all U.S. quarters.

The probability of getting a U.S. quarter on the first draw is 46/50.

Since the coin is not replaced after each draw, the probability of getting a U.S. quarter on the second draw is 45/49, and so on.

Therefore, the probability of getting all U.S. quarters in seven draws can be calculated as follows:

= (46/50) x (45/49) x (44/48) x (43/47) x (42/46) x (41/45) x (40/44)

= 0.375

So, the probability of getting at least one Canadian quarter out of seven draws is:

1 - 0.375 = 0.625 or 62.5%

Therefore, there is a 62.5% chance of getting at least one Canadian quarter when seven quarters are randomly picked from the bag.

Know more about the complementary probability.

https://brainly.com/question/9752956

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to first draw a diagram of the triangle and rectangle. Let the two legs of the triangle be of length x units. Since the triangle is right isosceles, we know that x^2 + x^2 = 7^2 (by the Pythagorean theorem). Simplifying, we get x = 7/√2 units.

Now let's draw the rectangle inscribed in the triangle such that two opposite corners of the rectangle lie on the hypotenuse of the triangle. Let the length of the rectangle be l and the width be w. We know that the sum of the two legs of the triangle is equal to the hypotenuse (x + x = 7/√2). Therefore, the sum of the dimensions of the rectangle must also be equal to the hypotenuse. So, we have l + w = 7/√2.

We want to maximize the area of the rectangle, which is given by A = lw. Using the equation l + w = 7/√2, we can solve for one of the variables in terms of the other. For example, we can solve for w to get w = 7/√2 - l. Substituting this into the formula for the area, we get A = l(7/√2 - l).

Now we can use calculus to find the maximum value of the area. Taking the derivative of A with respect to l, we get dA/dl = 7/√2 - 2l. Setting this equal to zero and solving for l, we get l = 7/2√2 units. Plugging this value of l back into the formula for the area, we get A = 49/8 square units.

Therefore, the largest area the rectangle can have is 49/8 square units when the length of the rectangle is 7/2√2 units and the width is also 7/2√2 units. This occurs when the rectangle is a square inscribed in the right isosceles triangle.

To know more about area visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1658516

#SPJ11

One possible dependent measure for your experiment could be the looking time of the babies towards each collection of objects. You can use a visual preference method where you present the babies with both collections of objects side-by-side and measure the amount of time they spend looking at each one.

Another possible dependent measure is habituation or dishabituation. In this method, you repeatedly present one collection of objects to the babies until they become habituated, i.e., they stop paying attention to it. Then, you introduce the other collection of objects and measure if the babies show a renewed interest, indicating that they perceive a difference between the two collections.

Other measures could include physiological measures such as heart rate or brain activity using non-invasive techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). However, these measures may require more specialized equipment and expertise.

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/1781657

#SPJ11

Answer:

8 cubic millimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

The larger pyramid has a height of 8 and the smaller pyramid has a height of 4

Therefore the scale factor from smaller to larger = 8/4 = 2

This means each side of the base of the square pyramid is also twice the length of each side of the smaller pyramid

Let the base side length of the smaller pyramid be a and height h

The volume of a square pyramid with side a and height h is given by the formula

V = (1/3) a² h

So volume of smaller pyramid
V₂ = (1/3) a² h

If the pyramid is scaled by a factor of 2, then the larger pyramid will have each side = 2a and height = 2h

Therefore the volume of the larger pyramid in terms of a and h will be
V = (1/3) (2a)² (2h)

(2a)² = 4a²

So
V₁ = (1/3) (4a²) (2h)

V₁ = (1/3) a² h · 8

V₁ = 8 · (1/3) a² h = 8 · V₂

So the larger pyramid volume is 8 times the smaller pyramid

Smaller pyramid volume is given as 1 cubic millimeter

Larger pyramid volume = 8 x 1 = 8 cubic millimeters

Answer:

1.75 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose our linear equation is y = k × tb

We need to substitute , 1.95 and 3.13 into y = k × tb

9.5 = ktb 3.5 = 2k ⇒ k = 1.75

13 = 3ktb 9.5 = 1.75tb ⇒ b = 7.75

Equation now equals y = 1.75 × tb

Rate of change of the rabbit per week: 1.75

1.75 is the answer

If a rectangular parking lot having area of 10 km², width 1 km, then the width of "parking-lot" is 10 km.

The "Area" of a rectangle is the measurement of the region enclosed by a rectangle in a two-dimensional space. It is calculated by multiplying the length of the rectangle by its width. The area of a rectangle is given by the formula : length × width;

We are given that the area of the "parking-lot" is 10 square kilometers and the width is 1 kilometer.
Substituting the values,

We get,

⇒ 10 = length × 1 ;

⇒ length = 10 km² / 1 km;

⇒ length = 10 km;

Therefore, the length of rectangular "parking-lot" is 10 kilometers.

Learn more about Area here

https://brainly.com/question/1158033

#SPJ1

Thus, the maximum profit the baker can earn is $0.90 if the customer wants to buy no more than six doughnuts and wants to try at least one of each kind.

To solve this problem, we need to understand that there are different kinds of doughnuts that the customer wants to try, and that the baker earns a profit of 15 cents per glazed doughnut sold.

Let's assume that there are three kinds of doughnuts: glazed, chocolate, and jelly-filled. If the customer wants to try at least one of each kind, they could buy two glazed, two chocolate, and two jelly-filled doughnuts.

This adds up to a total of six doughnuts.

This is because the customer can only buy up to six doughnuts, and they want to try at least one of each kind. Therefore, the baker cannot sell more than two of each kind of doughnut.

In conclusion, the maximum profit the baker can earn is $0.90 if the customer wants to buy no more than six doughnuts and wants to try at least one of each kind.

Know more about the maximum profit

https://brainly.com/question/29257255

#SPJ11

The bulge in the age pyramid in Canada in 2010 for the age group between 45 and 54 is most likely due to the "baby boomer" generation.

The baby boomer generation refers to individuals who were born during the post-World War II period between 1946 and 1964. This generation is known for its high birth rates and is now entering the age range of 45 to 54 years old.

As a result, this age group has become the largest percentage of the population in Canada in 2010, leading to the bulge in the age pyramid. The trend is expected to continue as the baby boomers continue to age, leading to an increase in the proportion of older adults in the population in the coming years.

To learn more about Canada here

https://brainly.com/question/635031

#SPJ4

In Canada in 2010, people between the ages of 45 and 54 made up the largest percentage of the population.

What factor is most likely to have caused this bulge in the age pyramid?

If a random sample of 40 UCF students has a mean electricity bill of $110, the 90% confidence interval for the mean electricity bill of all UCF students is $105.34 to $114.66.

To construct a 90% confidence interval for the mean electricity bill of all UCF students, we can use the following formula:

Confidence interval = sample mean ± (z-score)(standard error)

where the z-score for a 90% confidence level is 1.645 and the standard error is the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size, or:

standard error = 17.90 / √40 = 2.83

Substituting the given values, we get:

Confidence interval = 110 ± (1.645)(2.83)

Confidence interval = 110 ± 4.66

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for the mean electricity bill of all UCF students is $105.34 to $114.66.

More on mean: https://brainly.com/question/16108617

#SPJ11

We need to make 28 pairwise comparisons among the eight means to compare the mean SAT scores for each ethnic group.

To make all pairwise comparisons among the eight means, we need to calculate the number of unique pairs of means. The formula for calculating the number of unique pairs is n(n-1)/2, where n is the number of items.

The SAT is a standardized test widely used for college admissions in the United States. The test measures knowledge and skills in reading, writing, and mathematics. The test is scored on a scale of 400-1600, with separate scores for the reading/writing and math sections, each ranging from 200-800. The College Board publishes mean SAT scores for various groups, including ethnic groups, genders, and geographic regions.

In this case, we have 8 ethnic groups, so the number of unique pairs of means is:

8(8-1)/2 = 28

Therefore, we need to make 28 pairwise comparisons among the eight means to compare the mean for each ethnic group.

To learn more about College Board here

https://brainly.com/question/31593481

#SPJ4

The College Board publishes mean SAT scores for eight ethnic groups. How many tests are required to make all pairwise comparisons among the eight means?

The p-value from the given data is 0.1056. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

We obtain the Z-score P-values directly from the standard normal table, where each area corresponds to the probability to the left under the bell-shaped curve. The standard process to reject the claim of the experimenter is to see whether the P-value is less than 0.05 or not.

Let p be the population proportion of people who favored Candidate A.

The null hypothesis is: H₀: p>0.75

The alternative hypothesis H₁: p>0.75

The sample proportion is,

[tex]\bar p[/tex] =80/100 =0.8

The standard deviation is

[tex]\sigma=\sqrt{\frac{p.(1-p)}{n} }[/tex]

= √[0.75×(1-0.75)/100]

= 0.04

The z test statistic is:

Z=(p-[tex]\bar p[/tex])/σ

= (0.75-0.8)/0.04

= -1.25

Using standard normal table we get the area to the left corresponding to the test statistic z=-1.25 is 0.1056.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

Learn more about the random sample here:

https://brainly.com/question/12719656.

#SPJ12

"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"

A random sample of 100 people was taken. Eighty of the people in the sample favored Candidate A. We are interested in determining whether or not the proportion of the population in favor of Candidate A is significantly more than 75%.

The p-value is

A) 0.2112

B) 0.1056

C) 0.025

D) 0.1251

To express the limit as n approaches infinity as a definite integral, we can start by simplifying the Riemann sum: Rn = ∑(k=1 to n) f(x_k)Δx.

  = (5+2)/n ∑(k=1 to n) (5+2k/n)
  = 7/n [n(5+2/n) + (5+4/n) + (5+6/n) + ... + (5+2n/n)]
  = 7/n [(5+n(2/n))/2 + (5+n(4/n))/2 + (5+n(6/n))/2 + ... + (5+n(2n/n))/2]
  = 7/n [(5n+2n+4n+6n+...+2n)/n + (5+5+5+...+5)/2]
  = 7/n [(n/2)(2+4+6+...+2n) + 5n/2]
  = 7/n [(n/2)(n+1) + 5n/2]
  = (35/2) + (21/n)

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, the second term approaches zero, leaving us with: lim(n→∞) Rn = ∫(5 to 7) (5+x) dx, Therefore, the definite integral that corresponds to the given Riemann sum is ∫(5 to 7) (5+x) dx, where the interval of integration is from x=5 to x=7.

Now, let's set up the Riemann sum formula: Rn = (Δx)Σ[ln(x_i)], where i goes from 1 to n, and Δx is the difference between the consecutive x-values. Since the interval is [5, 5 + 2n], Δx = (5 + 2n - 5) / n = 2n/n = 2.

So, the Riemann sum can be written as Rn = 2Σ[ln(5 + 2i)]. To find the definite integral, we take the limit as n approaches infinity: lim (n → ∞) [2Σ[ln(5 + 2i)]].

This limit represents the definite integral of the function ln(x) over the interval [5, 5 + 2n]: ∫[5, 5+2n] ln(x) dx.
So, the answer is the definite integral of ln(x) over the interval [5, 5 + 2n].

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

So, we can estimate with 95% confidence that the proportion of Broward College students who are employed is between 77.3% and 82.7%.

onstruct a 95% confidence interval estimate for the proportion of Broward College students who are employed. In this survey, we have a sample size (n) of 835 students, of which 668 are employed.

To calculate the sample proportion (p), we divide the number of employed students by the total sample size:

p = 668 / 835 ≈ 0.8

To construct a 95% confidence interval, we need the standard error (SE) of the proportion. We can calculate SE using the following formula:

SE = sqrt(p(1 - p) / n) ≈ sqrt(0.8(1 - 0.8) / 835) ≈ 0.014

Next, we need the critical value (z) for a 95% confidence interval, which is approximately 1.96. Now, we can calculate the margin of error (ME):

ME = z * SE ≈ 1.96 * 0.014 ≈ 0.027

Finally, we can construct the 95% confidence interval by adding and subtracting the margin of error from the sample proportion:

Lower bound: p - ME ≈ 0.8 - 0.027 ≈ 0.773
Upper bound: p + ME ≈ 0.8 + 0.027 ≈ 0.827

To learn more about confidence interval click here

brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

Therefore, the expected time for the system to fail is the weighted average of the failure times of the three modes, with equal weights assigned to each mode.

the expected time for a system to fail, given that it can transition between three modes with equal probability. To calculate the expected time, we'll use the concept of expected value.
Let's assume the failure times for the three modes are T1, T2, and T3, and the probability of choosing each mode is 1/3, since it's equally likely.
The expected time taken for the system to fail can be calculated by multiplying the failure time of each mode with its respective probability and then adding the products together:
Expected Time = (T1 * 1/3) + (T2 * 1/3) + (T3 * 1/3)
Therefore, the expected time for the system to fail is the weighted average of the failure times of the three modes, with equal weights assigned to each mode.

To learn more about the average visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

The best statement of the conclusion for your meeting would be: C. There is not sufficient evidence that the mean body temperature of women is < 98.6 degrees F.

Based on the given options, the best statement of the conclusion would be option C, which states that there is not sufficient evidence that the mean body temperature of women is less than 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

To elaborate further, the conclusion is drawn based on the hypothesis testing that was conducted to test whether the mean body temperature of women is significantly different from the commonly accepted value of 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

The null hypothesis (H0) in this case would be that the mean body temperature of women is equal to 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that the mean body temperature of women is less than 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

The hypothesis testing would involve calculating the test statistic, which in this case could be the t-statistic, and comparing it with the critical value from the t-distribution, based on the level of significance and degrees of freedom. If the calculated test statistic is greater than the critical value, then the null hypothesis would be rejected, indicating that there is sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

On the other hand, if the calculated test statistic is less than the critical value, then the null hypothesis would fail to be rejected, indicating that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

In this scenario, the conclusion states that there is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, which means that the mean body temperature of women is not significantly different from 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

It is important to note that the conclusion is not a definitive statement, but rather a statistical inference based on the sample data collected. Further research and analysis could be conducted to verify the results and draw more concrete conclusions.

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11