Plz helppppp.......? I need help ILL MARK U BRAINLIST

Answer:

The answer is writing plays and books to support the patriot cause of liberty!

Explanation:

i got the answer correct on my test

Answer:

B-Battle of Palmito Ranch

Explanation:

Answer:

I think no 3 is the answer

This system is distinguished from others because it has a chief executive (the president) who is chosen by the people to serve a limited term in office with a distinct separation of powers (the executive branch) as well as specific limitations on exactly what he/she can do while in office.

Answer:

no se

Explanation:

Answer:

The right to due process provide American citizens with the chance to receive fair application of the law before they can be indicted with their sentence/punishment.

Cross-examining evidence is a very crucial part of the fair application of the law. By suppressing a certain evidence, we take away the ability of the defendants to fully proof their innocence in the court. This might caused them to be punished for the crimes that they never did. This is a clear violation of constitutional right to due process.

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South. The conduct of the governments he established turned many Northerners against the president's policies.

Answer:

Explanation:

Madison was actually once the Bill of Rights’ chief opponent. In his book, The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents, Corey Brettschneider, a political science professor at Brown University, writes that when the founding father entered the race for Congress as a candidate for the state of Virginia in 1788, the issue of whether America needed a Bill of Rights was a dominating campaign issue. George Mason, a fellow Virginian, had refused to sign the Constitution without a Bill of Rights. But Madison argued it was unnecessary and perhaps even harmful.

His reasoning? “Madison might have felt like a master chef watching a patron pour ketchup all over his perfectly cooked steak,” Brettschneider writes. “He considered his work crafting the Constitution so thorough that there was nothing to amend: Article I limited the powers of Congress, and Article II constrained the president. A Bill of Rights was redundant at best—and dangerous at worst.”

Answer:

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

PLS MAKE ME BRAINLIEST :)

Answer:

The Cold War was a global conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, lasting from powers met at the Russian resort town of Yalta to plan for the future after Hitler's defeat. It was "Cold" because neither side won, let alone attacked.

Explanation:

Answer:

It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

just bc

Answer:

its C

Explanation:

The second and third poster is saying to buy government bonds which is economic investments

Answer:

he did his most creative work guiding the colonist as they laid out a network of tightly organized towns

Answer:

John Winthrop (1588–1649) was an early Puritan leader whose vision for a godly commonwealth created the basis for an established religion that remained in place in Massachusetts until well after adoption of the First Amendment. It was, however, eventually superseded by ideas of separation of church and state

Explanation:

hope it helps...

Authority is the answer!

Answer:

C. It allowed their populations to grow quickly.

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

In this extraordinarily strange election year, debating the Electoral College might seem an odd pastime when so many other issues concern us. But its logic, its distortion of the democratic process and its underlying flaws will still strongly influence the conduct of the election. So, let me make the case for its abolition and its replacement by a simple national popular vote, to be held in an entity we will call (what the heck) the United States of America.

There are three basic arguments in favor of the system the framers of the Constitution gave us, with little sense of how it would actually work. The first is easily dismissed. Presidential electors are not more qualified than other citizens to determine who should head the government. They are simply party loyalists who do not deliberate about anything more than where to eat lunch.

A second argument holds less populous states deserve the further electoral weight they gain through the “senatorial bump” giving each state two electors, because their minority status entitles them to additional political protection. But the real interests of small-state voters are never determined by the relative size of the population of their states. If, say, environmental sustainability or abortion or the Second Amendment is your dominant concern, it does not matter whether you live in Wyoming or California, Pennsylvania or Delaware. The size of a state does not affect our real political preferences, even though the Electoral College system imagines that it does.

Third, defenders of the Electoral College also claim that it supports the underlying value of federalism. Having the states play an autonomous role in presidential elections, it is said, reinforces the division of governing authority between the nation and the states. But explaining exactly how it does this remains a mystery. Having a state-based system for electing both houses of Congress should be adequate to that task. Presidential elections have little if anything to do with the subject, even when some candidates claim to be “running against Washington.”

What are the positive arguments in favor of replacing the existing electoral system with a national popular vote? Here, again, there are three main points to make.

Yes, Debating the Electoral College may seem like an unusual activity in this incredibly bizarre election year when so many other topics are on our minds. However, despite its flawed logic, distortion of the democratic process, and fundamental weaknesses, it will have a significant impact on how the election is run.

We choose the president of the United States through the Electoral College procedure. It was established by the U.S. Constitution to distribute presidential election authority among the 50 states. It was created to make sure that while picking the nation's leader, the larger states wouldn't outnumber the smaller states.

Voters choose an electorate every four years whose sole duty is to choose the president and vice president. The Electoral College is the name given to this body of voters.

Let me thus argue for its repeal and replacement by a straightforward national popular vote that would take place in a country we will call the United States of America.

Thus, Yes, Debating the Electoral College may seem like an unusual activity.

For more information about  Electoral College, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/25375266

#SPJ2

Answer:

TRadinaol chinesse rule

Explanation:

I found a quizlet that might help

https://quizlet.com/85137147/world-history-chapter-11-flash-cards/

Answer:

Because he believed he was the son of Inti, the Sun God or because Inti had promised Pachacuti success in a vision.

Explanation:

Pachacuti was the ninth Sapa Inca, or emperor, of the Inca Empire. He is known for expanding the empire through military conquest and for implementing significant political and administrative reforms.

Because he believed he was the son of Inti, the Sun God or because Inti had promised Pachacuti success in a vision. One reason why Pachacuti felt he was stronger than Uscovilca could have been because of his military successes.

Pachacuti led the Inca armies to conquer numerous neighboring tribes, expanding the empire's territory and wealth. He also introduced new military tactics and weapons, such as the sling and the battle-axe.

Additionally, Pachacuti reorganized the empire's administrative system, creating a centralized government and strengthening the power of the emperor. This could have given him a sense of confidence in his own abilities and the strength of his rule.

Overall, Pachacuti's military successes and administrative reforms likely contributed to his belief that he was stronger than Uscovilca.

Learn more about Pachacuti here

https://brainly.com/question/15386055

#SPJ3

The Battle of Sabine Pass is the battle that stop the Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after Confederate defeats at Vicksburg and Gettysburg.

Battle of Sabine Pass is one of the Civil war where the small Confederate force thwarts a Union invasion of Texas at the mouth of the Sabine River on the Texas-Louisiana border.

Hence, the Battle of Sabine Pass is the battle that stop the Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after Confederate defeats at Vicksburg and Gettysburg.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Battle of Sabine Pass

brainly.com/question/26270206

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Germany gained control of territory from Austria-Hungary was not a result of the Treaty of Versailles.

Germany's colonial empire was officially dissolved with the Treaty of Versailles after Germany's defeat in the war and where each colony became a League of Nations mandate under the supervision (but not ownership) of one of the victorious powers.

The Versailles Treaty forced Germany to give up territory to Belgium, Czechoslovakia and Poland, return Alsace and Lorraine to France and cede all of its overseas colonies in China, the Pacific and Africa to the Allied nations.

Learn more about Germany's colonies after ww1 here:  https://brainly.com/question/8535233

#SPJ2

Answer:

Process of Elimination

Explanation: Sorry but I'm not completely sure what the answer is though using the process of elimination and the data I realized that:

It's not A

It's not B

It's not C

It might be D

In negative numbers the smaller the number the bigger so the double of France would be the size of Germany. (I think)

Answer:It's B.

Explanation:

Process of elimination, duh. :) But D does not even make sense, because it said the DECREASE, NOT the increase. And also, the chart literally says that France is greater than Germany.

The answer is D im preaty sure i am right

Answer:

The IMF and the World Bank

Explanation:

Explanation:

The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement in the eighteenth century that emphasized reason and science.

The British colonist Benjamin Franklin gained fame on both sides of the Atlantic as a printer, publisher, and scientist. He embodied Enlightenment ideals in the British Atlantic with his scientific experiments and philanthropic endeavors.

Enlightenment principles guided the founding of the colony of Georgia, but those principles failed to stand up to the realities of colonial life.

The Enlightenment

The Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, was an intellectual and cultural movement in the eighteenth century that emphasized reason over superstition and science over blind faith. Using the power of the press, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Isaac Newton, and Voltaire questioned accepted knowledge and spread new ideas about openness, investigation, and religious tolerance throughout Europe and the Americas. Many consider the Enlightenment a major turning point in Western civilization, an age of light replacing an age of darkness.

Answer:

Jay's treaty promised the evacuation of the troops in the U.S. from the Revolution and it also prevented war with Britain (.◜ω◝.)/

Answer:

Saharan, Sahelian, wet tropical and equatorial climate

Explanation:

Answer:

The government created propaganda posters and printed stories about the victory garden

Explanation:

Answer:

Myths are important because without myths there are no gods or monsters. They need these myths to continue society.

Explanation: