Jordan is on a ride along with Officer Leo. Officer Leo pulls over a car for making an illegal turn. When he goes up to talk to the driver, he sees a bag of what appears to be illegal drugs on the passenger seat. No one else is in the car. Officer Leo tells the driver to get out of the car. He places the driver in handcuffs, since he is the only officer there, and tells him that he needs to check for weapons. The officer searches the inside of the car and then the trunk. He doesn't find any weapons, but he does find more drugs in the trunk. Only then does he arrest the driver and return to the station. A colleague processes the driver, and Officer Leo and Jordan go back out.

Are the drugs from the passenger seat of the car the result of a legal search? Why or why not?
What about the drugs from the trunk of that same car? Support you answer.

Answer:

The answer above is wrong.

Explanation:

It is legal for an officer to search a motorist's automobile as long as he has a valid justification for doing so. When there is a probable cause, Officer Leo may also search the trunk of the car.

Hope this helps :)

The federal, state and local governments in the United States have clear, explicit drug laws. Even if you're not using drugs and the drugs aren't yours, being around them can justify an arrest and conviction. Depending on your state's laws, even possessing drug paraphernalia may result in an arrest.

They will most likely be arrested unless they can demonstrate on the spot that someone else had access to the area and maybe the owner of the drugs. If this occurs to you, it is critical that you do not resist arrest and instead remain polite and respectful. Simultaneously, refrain from providing any information other than your identity.

If drugs are discovered in a vehicle, the driver, passengers, or a combination of both can be charged with illegal drug possession and held liable. Even if a passenger is caught with drugs, the driver may be charged with constructive possession.

Learn more about Drugs here:

https://brainly.com/question/13294633

#SPJ2

An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.

state and explain the law of demand​

What is the difference between a serial killer and someone who kills repeatedly and is charged under RICO? What
different facts would need to be presented for a RICO charge to work?

Isaac lives in a country where when the police accuse someone of criminal behavior, that person is brought into a court. Then, a judge or group of judges determine whether that person is guilty of the crime they are charged with. What is an accurate description of this practice?

How did Christian missionary work sometimes make it more difficult for European powers to control their conquered territories?

An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.

Distracted drivers surround you on the road. _____ of drivers talk on cell phones.

is a written set of instructions that tells a bank how to use money to pay someone.

Why minors must provide work paper if they have work permit? And what is the document that can replace work paper if the school is closed and they didn’t graduate yet?

Cuál es la diferencia entre capacidad y derecho

Please help, I will give brainliest. I need more than one answer.



I am going to begin law school soon but I decided to write an opening statement to see if I am good or not. Sorry if it’s a bit all over the place but i tried. I just want to know your opinion.


Here it is



Diabetic Coma in Car Court Session
Law(s) broken : Driving Without License
Hello, the case I’m presenting to the court is for John and Jane Doe. This case is because Jane Doe drove her husband home because he was having a diabetic seizure in the car and his wife stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the car when a police officer stopped them. I would like to start off with addressing that it is legal to break the law of murder. One of the biggest law as it includes taking a human’s life. It is legal to break that law if, and only if by breaking the law you save a human life or defend yourself. In this case the witness broke a law because their husband was having a diabetic coma. At most time during this case if there is only a single person in the car and that very person has a diabetic coma, it could cause destruction of property, a chain reaction car crash, and even the person’s life could be lost. Since there were 2 people in the car Ms. Jane stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the hospital when a police officer stopped them. In the video she took you can see her and in the corner the navigation is set to the nearest hospital. I have asked for the body cam footage to present as deeper evidence and they agreed. Even in the body cam footage you can see that as well. There have been many cases in which the following case has been presented to the court in various different situations and have been exempted and excused of all charges. The law is to protect the people of America and have order, but in this case the law could cause a human life to be lost instead. Your honor, I believe that we can agree that the laws were set to protect the lives of Americans and to have order. What kind of order is there when you have about 5 families who have a loved one or even worse their entire family who has died, simply because of one person. The laws are meant to being justice to Americans, but what kind of justice is there in multiple people dying because of one man who didn’t even know what was happening. Thanks to Ms. Jane that didn’t happen, thanks to Ms. Jane, the possibility of that day being known as the day that many people lost their lives and all because one man who’s wife simply turned a blind eye to even though he was having a diabetic coma. But instead she followed the law even though she knew it would mean having many human lives lost. Possibly even hers. So I stand here in front of the court not asking you to rule for me, but instead to put yourself in the situation. What will you do, break the law to save other people. Or stand with the law even though it means you will probably end up killing others. Your honor, I don’t think there is much more to say. So with that, I rest my case. Hoping that this is enough to suit the court.

Which of the following is not one of the support disciplines generally provided individuals incarcerated in a correctional facility?

In what types of situation should police officers be allowed to not enforce the law

Which of the following is NOT considered circumstantial evidence?

O fibers
O eye witness reports
O tool marks
O soil
O DNA

For any geometric figures A and B , if A ≈ B, then B ≈ A.

is a 6.33 a D grade or a C grade

What are some comebacks when someone shames you for being a teen mom? I need them asap, ty your a life savver :)))

What percent of people with a serious mental illness commit violent acts?
89%
42%
65%
5%

What do you feel about sleepy driver

Place the tiles in the correct order of how an appropriations bill would be passed

What states can I legally own a pet bat?

Why is the medical examiners autopsy completed within 24 to 48 hours of a homicide?

A company’s new product is sold for $16.50 per unit. Product sales in the United States earn $400,000 and product sales in Europe earn $230,000. How many units does it sell altogether in the United States and Europe?

How long will it take for this to get taken down?

Based on the quote what can be presumed about the rule of law?

Aside from the president, who else has the authority to enact an executive order?

A). state governors

B). law enforcement officials

C). no one else

D). senators

Mr Ali needs to build a swing for her daughter.He needs 9 feet of rope for each side of the swing and 6 more feet for the monkey bar. The hardware store sells rope by the yard. How many yards does he need?

HELP!!!ASAP!!!
which of the following is NOT something you should do on long trips?

Take breaks only when you're getting really tired

Inspect your vehicle

Check the weather conditions

Check to make sure you have your driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance

A plaintiff filed a negligence action against two defendants in federal district court, invoking the court's diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Prior to serving their answers, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court denied the motion, concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was proper. The defendants then filed their answers responding to the merits of the complaint and denying negligence. The defendants' answers also contained motions to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Five weeks later, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. If the court determines that venue in fact is improper, how should the court rule on the defendants' venue motion

Si usted empieza a sentir sueño cuando esta conduciendo usted debería A. Acelere para llegar a su destino lo mas pronto posible B. Pare y deténgase al lado de la carretera C. Parar en un parada de descanso (rest stop)