One year long it takes to Fraud Alert on Your Credit Report Last.
When someone obtains or takes your personal information, identity theft occurs. The data can subsequently be used to obtain advantages like employment, insurance, or housing, or to start credit accounts with your name. Your credit score may be impacted by identity theft.
The removal of fake information and obligations from your credit bureau, known as blocking, is another option available to you if you've been the victim of identity theft. You must accomplish this by sending the following to the credit reporting businesses: a report of identity theft, which is possible through IdentityTheft.gov.
If you're dealing with identity theft, remember that there is a way out, but it can take some time. Vera Tolmachocreiff, Rehabilitation Manager at Assured Identity Protection, is one of our identity experts.
learn more about credit reports here:
https://brainly.com/question/2989669
#SPJ4
a defendant was charged with possession of prescription drugs without a prescription. at trial, the defendant testified that he received the drugs from
The court should allow the prosecutor to ask about the defendant's previous convictions to show that the defendant knew the prescription drugs were not an over-the-counter medication.
What is the role of court?
To the unique conflicts that are presented before them, courts apply the law. The Courts are frequently asked to uphold restrictions on the government. They safeguard against abuses by all executive and legislative branches. To the unique conflicts that are presented before them, courts apply the law. It is common practice to request that courts uphold limitations on the government. They provide protection from abuse by all legislative branches.
Know more about court- brainly.com/question/2123715
#SPJ4
The Immigration and Naturalization Service, a federal agency involved in immigration security, has applied a rule stating that prior to deportation, an individual must be allowed a due process hearing at which they can make a case against their deportation. This would be which of the following types of laws?
Administrative laws are The Immigration and Naturalization Service, a federal agency involved in immigration security, has applied a rule stating that prior to deportation.
Ensuring responsibility for administrative agencies is the basic goal of administrative law. This body of law limits the authority of the executive branch and ensures public transparency by allowing for the judicial process of agency actions.
An essential component of the Indian government is administrative law. It makes sure that government officials abide by the Indian Constitution and respect the rights of their constituents. The administration of particular laws is regulated by Indian administrative law.
Officials or organizations (administrators) that exercise public authority and carry out public functions are subject to administrative law regulations. It is intended to make sure that administrators decide fairly.
learn more about Administrative laws here
https://brainly.com/question/8358717
#SPJ4
When we ask why a particular decision was made by a court, we are expressing which of the following?A. Respect for the courtB. FactsC. Statutory lawD. Legal positivism
When we ask why a particular decision was made by a court, we are expressing Respect for court.
When a people's rights or decisions are violated, the only way to seek redress is through the judiciary. We have complete faith in our judicial system, and we should be aware of the fact that wherever there is injustice committed by the legislative or executive branches of a democracy, the court has always given the victim and society the right redress. It is important to comprehend and accept that the judges render their judgements impartially and without regard for anyone's pride or bias. Every judgement is taken in accordance with County's established laws. So, it is necessary to respect judicial decisions.
learn more about respect for judiciary here:
https://brainly.com/question/28163246
#SPJ4
trevarious was a judge in a court that rendered decisions binding only on the parties involved in the dispute. in which type of court is trevarious a judge?
Trevarious was a judge in a court that rendered decisions binding only on the parties involved in the dispute. Trevarious is a judge in trial court.
What is trial court?
A court with original governance where trials are conducted is known as a trial court or court of first case. Advanced courts with the capability of appellate review generally hear prayers from the judgments of trial courts. The maturity of appellate courts only makes opinions regarding legal issues and warrant the power to hear substantiation or accept substantiation. substantiation and evidence are allowed in the trial court in agreement with the procedural legislation that applies and the rules of substantiation, and conclusions known as findings of fact are reached grounded on the substantiation.
Know more about trial court - brainly.com/question/29614273
#SPJ4
Preston wants to be his own boss and is considering starting a business. He has to decide which form of business organization to adopt and will most likely consider all of the following except:a.) publicity and public relations.b.) tax issues.c.) the various types of liability to which owners are subject.
Preston wants to be his own boss and is considering starting a business. He has to decide which form of business organization to adopt and will most likely consider all of the following except (a.) publicity and public relations is correct option.
Preston will need to manage and set up his company environment in order to launch a new venture, beginning with the basics. He must complete out the necessary paperwork, pay the associated fees, take care of the numerous liabilities that the owners are responsible for, and deal with any tax matters.
Publicity and PR are crucial for a business to thrive, but a new business should focus more on getting the fundamentals right and building a solid foundation than anything else.
To know more about business.
https://brainly.com/question/30648746
#SPJ4
Eldon recently shot portraits of a client. The photos turned out so well that Eldon wants to use them in advertisements for his studio. When Elson asked the client for permissions to sue the photos, she said no, but Eldon used the photos anyway. Which ethical principle did Eldon violate in this scenario?
A. autonomy
B. fidelity
C. copyright
D. attrition
The ethical principle which Eldon violate in this scenario is fidelity. Thus, the correct option is B.
What is fidelity?A person's obligation to be trustworthy and dependable in their relationships with others is addressed by the concept of fidelity. Additionally, it entails maintaining promises, keeping commitments, and being trustworthy.
In all study, fidelity is a fundamental ethical norm that is intertwined with the other six ethical guidelines. Both research participants and researchers must have faith in one another for the process to be successful.
A crucial component of any relationship is fidelity. It serves as a gauge of the importance and confidence both partners place in their partnership. As "activities motivated by compassion," beneficence is.
Every day, we practice beneficence by giving painkillers or holding the hand of a bereaved relative. The ethical rule of faithfulness compels us to provide care in a selfless manner.
Learn more about fidelity, here
https://brainly.com/question/15106643
#SPJ1
In California, which of the following shall a licensee furnish to a client or former client upon request and reasonable notice? C) All of the licensee's working papers. C) A copy of the licensee's working papers, to the extent that those working papers include records that would ordinarily constitute part of the client's records and are not otherwise available to the client. C) Any accounting or other records belonging to, or obtained from or on behalf of, the client which the licensee removed from the client's premises or received for the client's account. C) Both b. and c.
a copy of the licensee's working papers, to the extent that such working papers contain records that would typically be included in the client's records and are otherwise not accessible to the client.
What is working paper?Technical papers and working papers are both acceptable terms. Before submitting to an academic journal or peer-reviewed conference, authors frequently make working papers available to share ideas on a subject or to get feedback. The accounting company performing the audit is the owner of the working papers. Formally referred to as audit documentation or occasionally as the audit file, these documents are available online. The records attest to the auditing methods that were carried out, the evidence that was gathered, and the conclusion or opinion that the auditor reached. Working papers are records kept by the auditor of the techniques used, the tests carried out, the data collected, and the essential conclusions drawn in the engagement.
To learn more about working papers click,
https://brainly.com/question/26441547
#SPJ4
when reading a news article about a lawsuit, you note that it was filed in your county's superior court. from this you know? ch.1-2
Answer:Im just here to get my points and have brainly
Explanation:thanks for understanding
If a judge believes that she should only strike down laws that clearly violate the Constitution, she likely believes in which of the following?
answer choices
Judicial activism
Original intent
Strict constructionism
Judicial restraint
In American legal theory and case law, judicial restraint has been around for a long time. In Fletcher v. Peck (1810), the U.S. Supreme Court said that judges should only overturn laws if they "feel a clear and strong conviction" that they are unconstitutional.
What is meant by Judicial Restraint?The idea behind judicial restraint is that judges shouldn't try to "legislate" from the bench; this should be left up to the legislature and the executive. As a result, lower court decisions should be given more weight. A smaller docket is typical of restrained courts.
A theory of judicial interpretation called Judicial Restraint encourages judges to limit their own power. It says that judges shouldn't overturn laws unless they clearly violate the Constitution.
In general, the idea of judicial restraint is that a judge shouldn't add his or her own preferences to decisions and proceedings in court. If judges hesitate to strike down laws that are not clearly unconstitutional, they are said to exercise judicial restraint.
To know more about Judicial Restraint, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
what is the name of the motion that may be made by either side during a trial asking the judge to decide the case in its favor as a matter of law because no facts have been introduced at trial supporting the claim of the other party?
a. Motion for a directed verdict may be made by either side during a jury trial asking the judge to decide the case in its favor as a matter of law.
A motion for directed verdict is a request to the court for a directed verdict. This motion is filed before a matter is presented to a jury, and it contends that no reasonable jury could rule in favor of the opposing side.
This motion may be made by either the plaintiff or the defendant. After the plaintiff has rested her case, the defendant may move for a directed verdict. If the judge grants the defendant's motion, the case is over.
If the request is denied by the judge, the defendant has the option to provide evidence. The plaintiff may apply for a directed verdict following the defendant's case in chief.
A directed verdict might also be requested by the plaintiff. Plaintiffs frequently seek a directed verdict for negligence.
To know more about directed verdict:
https://brainly.com/question/15105356
#SPJ4
Correct question:
What is the name of the motion that may be made by either side during a jury trial asking the judge to decide the case in its favor as a matter of law because no facts have been introduced at trial supporting the claim of the other party?
a. Motion for a directed verdict
b. Motion for a summary judgment
c. Motion for a judgment on the pleadings
d. Motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
______ is the use of a different material, method or technique than what was specified, usually by request of the contractor with approval of the designer.
Substitution is the use of a different material, method, or technique than what was specified, usually by request of the contractor with the approval of the designer.
The desire for Substitution refers to the Contractor's request to replace a certain material, product, thing, or performance that has been identified in the Contract Documents by a particular brand or trade name with one that is equivalent to or better.
The designer could assume vicarious duty and be held accountable for the contractor's negligence. When two or more parties are engaged in a partnership deal and discover that the existing agreement is no longer applicable or valid, a substituted contract is created.
The parties concerned replaced the initial agreement with just a new one in this situation. All parties concerned must agree to this. Simultaneous equations may usually be solved easily using the substitution method.
learn more about substitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/1709883
#SPJ4
what common practice was professor oberer critical in his 1961 university of texas law review article?
John Dickinson, a delegate from Delaware, was once the predominant writer. The Dickinson Draft of the Articles of Confederation named the confederation "the United States of America."
After large debate and revision, the Second Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.
What did the Articles of Confederation now not give?Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to defend or standardize trade between overseas international locations and the various states.
Learn more about critical in his 1961 university here;
https://brainly.com/question/2873636
#SPJ4
In his 1961 University of Texas Law Review article, Professor Oberer was highly critical of the common practice of judicial review. Judicial review is the power of a court to review and invalidate laws if they are deemed to be unconstitutional.
According to Professor Oberer, this practice was not consistent with the original intent of the founders of the United States and the text of the Constitution. He argued that the Constitution itself does not give the judiciary this power, and that it should not be used to override the will of the people and their representatives in Congress.
He suggested that the power of judicial review should be used sparingly and only when a law is found to be in direct violation of the Constitution.
know more about Texas here
https://brainly.com/question/12153172#
#SPJ11
Read Burdeau v. McDowell 256 U.S. 465 (1921) and draft a brief using the "IRAC" method. You can use the sample brief on Canvas as a guide.
IRAC stands for the legal analysis framework "Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion."
What is IRAC ?An effective essay adheres to some variation of the IRAC format, where each issue and sub-issue identified as a legal problem is grouped around a "issue," a "rule," a "application," and a "conclusion."
The most well-known model for handling legal issues is called IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). Materials, Issue, Rule or Resources, Arguments, and Tentative Conclusion, or MIRAT
The application/analysis component of an IRAC is the most crucial section since it creates the solution to the problem at hand. Before making a judgement, it helps to think like a lawyer, presenting the facts from both sides while adhering to the law.
Learn more about Burdeau v. McDowell here
https://brainly.com/question/8928156
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an order by the court commanding the other party actually to perform a bargain as agreed?A. Obiter dictaB. Stare decisisC. Eminent rationalityD. De novo judicial reviewE. Specific performance
Specific performance is an order by the court commanding the other party actually to perform a bargain as agreed.
A court may order a party to carry out a specific performance, such as completing the contract's performance, as a form of equitable relief under the law of contracts. If damages are a suitable alternative, it is normally not accessible but is usually available in the transfer of land law. Contracts for personal services hardly rarely allow for specific performance, although performance can nevertheless be secured by the possibility of legal action for contempt of court. A defendant's rights were only allowed to be awarded damages under common law. In the event that damages are insufficient, the court of equity later devised the relief of specific performance. The solution of a right holder, which grants the plaintiff the power to take the subject property, is frequently used to ensure specific performance.
Learn more about Specific performance here
https://brainly.com/question/28347754
#SPJ4
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question. comprehensive educational services employment services nutritional services social services
Prenatal care includes a)comprehensive educational services, b) employement services,d)social services.So,correct options are a,b,d.
Prenatal care, otherwise called antenatal consideration, is a sort of preventive medical services. It is given as clinical exams, comprising of suggestions on dealing with a sound way of life and the arrangement of clinical data like maternal physiological changes in pregnancy, natural changes, and pre-birth nourishment including pre-birth nutrients, which forestalls potential medical conditions over the span of the pregnancy and advances the mother and youngster's wellbeing alike.[1][2]The accessibility of routine pre-birth care, including pre-birth screening and conclusion, has had an impact in decreasing the recurrence of maternal demise, unsuccessful labors, birth surrenders, low birth weight, neonatal contaminations and other preventable medical issues.
Prenatal care has four components :
(1) the underlying admission history and actual assessment,
(2) intermittent screening or symptomatic testing,
(3) sequential assessments watching patterns of different objective estimations and patient's close to home change in accordance with pregnancy, and
(4) patient schooling.
Hence,options a,b and d are correct.
To know more about prenatal care,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30092987
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question.
a)comprehensive educational services
b)employment services
c)nutritional services
d)social services
Imposing a ban on public smoking can serve as an example of a law that adheres to the ______ School of jurisprudence
A. Command
B. Law and Economics
C. Sociological
D. Analytical
In the Netherlands, smoking tobacco products and electronic cigarettes are prohibited in the workplace.
Smoking is not permitted in any area. A smoke-free workplace is a legal requirement for employees. The term "workplace" in this context refers to the employee's whole workplace. This encompasses places like offices, the company cafeteria, company cars, stairwells, and restrooms.
Smoking is not permitted in private offices either.
No smoking allowed inside
It is forbidden to smoke in certain regions of buildings. Office and other commercial structures, public buildings, and (semi)government buildings are also affected.
whether to smoke A smoke-free workplace is not guaranteed to employees who do their jobs in (other people's) homes, such as those in-home care or catering.
To learn more about smoke the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/1218871
#SPJ4
adia filed a case against chang in the court at ohio. however, chang had never visited ohio and had no personal ties with anyone in ohio. chang could successfully argue that the court:
ADIA "is a government-run organization that belongs entirely to the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. After lengthy negotiations between the parties,
ADIA invested $7.5 billion in Citigroup in November 2007. 20.) The exchange was "intensely negotiated by the parties and their counsel over the course of several days at arm's length.
ADIA's original $7.5 billion investment was to be converted into Citigroup common shares on four different occasions between March 2010 and September 2011 in line with the ensuing agreement between ADIA and Citigroup (the "Investment Agreement").
Depending on the market price at the time of conversion, each share would be worth between $31.83 and $37.24.
To learn more about Adia filled in the given :link:https://brainly.com/question/22321141
#SPJ4
what is a principle did justice brandeis argue was included in the fourth amendment?
Brandeis attacked the proposition that expanding the Fourth Amendment to include protection of telephone conversations was inappropriate. At the time of the adoption of the Fourth Amendments,
What was Fourth amendment?
Despite having both Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren's names on it, it appears that Brandeis wrote the piece in its entirety[5] at Warren's request and on the basis of Warren's "deep-seated abhorrence of the violations of social privacy." In his important treatise on the privacy torts in American law, William Prosser was linked to the specific event to a journalistic encroachment on a particular society wedding, but in reality, it was motivated by more general coverage of sensitive personal lives in newspaper society columns.
The length of "The Right to Privacy"—7222 words, without citations—is modest by the norms of contemporary law reviews.
To study more about amendment
https://brainly.com/question/26706609
#SPJ4
Wheeler operated an automoblie service station, which he leased from W.C. Cornitius, Inc. The lease ran for three years. Although the lease did not contain any provisions for renewal, it was in fact renewed six times for successive three-year terms. The landlord refused to renew the lease for a seventh time. Wheeler brought suit to compel the landlord to accept his offer to renew the lease. Based on the information presented in Chapter 7 and/or other relevant research to decide this case.
As there is no obligation, For to renew the leases for the absence of the renewal clause, There was a lease that was unconscionable, and The losses in the leased service station.
What is information?Information is a general term for everything with the capacity to inform. Information is most fundamentally concerned with the interpretation of what may be sensed. Any naturally occurring process that is not entirely random, as well as any discernible pattern in any medium, can be said to convey some level of information.
As there are no lease provisions is there, That was entitled the lessee to such a periodic renewal. The are some lessor's sales of the service station. Abd as there are assurances be there made by lessors.
Therefore, As a result, A lease may be gives the rise to the expectations of the tenant.
Learn more about the information here:
https://brainly.com/question/13629038
#SPJ1
Under common law, an agreement begins when one party, the offeree, makes an promise to another party, the offeror. ?
False. Under common law, an agreement begins when an offer is made by the offeror and accepted by the offeree.
When does an agreement begin?
An agreement begins when an offer is made by the offeror and accepted by the offeree. The offer must be clear, definite, and capable of being accepted in order to create a binding agreement. Once the offer is accepted, the agreement is formed and both parties are bound to fulfill the terms of the agreement. The acceptance must be unconditional and correspond with the terms of the offer. If the offeree modifies the offer, it becomes a counteroffer and the original offer is considered revoked. The agreement is not formed until the offeror accepts the counteroffer.
Hence, the answer is, false. Under common law, an agreement begins when an offer is made by the offeror and accepted by the offeree.
To learn more about agreements, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/7494619
#SPJ4
a homogeneous mixture like salt and water can be separated by: select the correct answer below: distillation electrolysis shaking vigorously filtration
Answer: hi
Explanation:
A homogeneous mixture like salt and water can be separated by method called filtration.
A method of separating a heterogeneous mixture made up of two liquids with different particle sizes or a solid and a liquid is through filtration. It is ineffective for separation in the case of a homogeneous mixture like salt and water because the two substances are uniformly mixed at the molecular level, resulting in a solution. Filtration would not be effective in this situation because the salt particles are too small to be captured by the filter and the mixture would pass through unaltered.
Evaporation or distillation is a technique used to separate a homogeneous mixture such as salt and water. These techniques make use of the components various boiling points. By heating the mixture the water vapor can be condensed back into liquid form leaving the salt behind as it evaporates.
learn more about homogeneous mixture here
brainly.com/question/30587533
#SPJ2
the gross income filing thresholds are calculated as the sum of which of the following criteria? (check all that apply.)
The gross income filing thresholds are calculated as the sum of standard deduction and additional deductions for taxpayers aged 65 or older.
What is gross income filing?
Your gross income is your earnings before any taxes, or any other deductions are made. For both enterprises and people, the gross income is crucial because it reflects your financial history and financial position and accounting, which sheds light on your general financial health. In the realm of taxes, your adjusted gross income is a very significant factor. Lower adjusted gross income enables you to receive larger tax refunds while paying less in taxes overall.
Know more about gross income - brainly.com/question/29232912
#SPJ4
To influence policy making by the federal courts, the president may do all of the following EXCEPT
(A) take partisanship into account in making judicial appointments
(B) take political ideology into account in making judicial appointments
(C) fire and replace federal judges
(D) make public statements about issues that might appear before the courts
(E) encourage the Justice Department to get involved in cases that test certain issues
C) fire and replace federal judges. Federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, hold office for life during good behavior, and may only be removed through the process of impeachment. The President does have the power to nominate individuals for appointment to the federal bench, and may take partisanship and political ideology into account when making those nominations.
What is impeachment?
Impeachment is a constitutional process for removing a government official, such as the President, from office for wrongdoing. It begins in the House of Representatives and if approved, moves to a Senate trial. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote. Impeachment is a tool for holding officials accountable and preserving the rule of law. It is a rare occurrence, used only a few times in U.S. history.
Hence, the answer is, C) fire and replace federal judges.
To learn more about impeachment, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ4
which of the following types of system consists of a league of independent states, each having essentially sovereign powers, and a central government with limited powers?
Confederal states are a type of system consisting of a league of independent states, each having essentially sovereign powers and a central government with limited powers.
An organization of independent states governs under the confederal system. The independent states grant the central government its power. Each state is in charge, and its representatives meet to discuss the group's needs.
the former Soviet Union, today is known as the Association of Independent States (CIS). Additionally, the Confederate States in America and the cantonal system of Switzerland (1861-1865).
A confederation is an agreement between a number of people or countries that permits each component to govern themselves while still agreeing to cooperate for shared goals. During the American Civil War, the South was arguably the most well-known confederacy.
learn more about Confederal states here
https://brainly.com/question/9435254
#SPJ4
US involvement in Vietnam: reasons for, and nature of, the involvement at different stages; domestic effects & at the end of the war; Latin American protest against the war
The reasons for US involvement in Vietnam war was preventing the region's occupation by communists.
How did the US's presence in Vietnam affect domestic issues in the country?
America was profoundly impacted by the Vietnam War. Domestically, the unpopularity of the war caused the military conscription to be abolished in 1973, and the United States has not since enlisted faces from the general crowd. The conflict also significantly reduced Americans' faith in political authorities.
What was Vietnam War?
The Vietnam War, constantly appertained to by other names, lasted from 1 November 1955 until 30 April 1975, when Saigon fell. It took place in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. Officially, North Vietnam and South Vietnam engaged in the second of the Indochina Wars.
Know more about Vietnam war- brainly.com/question/29653942
#SPJ4
Create a list of rights that you think that you hace. Then identify 3 that you think are the most important
Freedom of speech and expression, The right to a free and unperturbed media, the right to worship religion in a free setting are the most important.
What are Fundamental rights?
The Fundamental Rights in India, which are incorporated in section III (Article 12-32) of the Indian Constitution, provide civil rights so that all Indians can live peaceful and harmonious lives as Indian citizens. These rights are referred to as "basic" because they are crucial for all-round growth, including material, intellectual, moral, and spiritual development, and they are safeguarded by the constitution, which is the fundamental law of the nation. According to Article 32, the Parliament may enact stringent measures if the constitutional rights, or the fundamental rights, have been violated.
Individual freedoms like equality before the law, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly are among them, and they are shared by the majority of liberal democracies.
To study more about Fundamental rights
https://brainly.com/question/29629830
#SPJ1
Which of the following sections of United States Constitution is most related to the case Marbury versus Madison?
In Marbury v. Madison, Madison broadens the role of the federal courts by granting them the authority to decide whether legislation or executive orders are in violation with the Constitution. The Federalist 78 is about the authority and role of the federal courts.
What is federal courts ?Cases involving human rights, bankruptcy, native title, workplace dynamics, unfair commercial practises, intellectual property, and consumer protection may be heard by the federal court. The federal government's judgements in areas like social security, immigration, and taxation are subject to examination by this body as well. The law's interpretation, its constitutionality, and its application to specific circumstances are all reserved to federal courts. Like Congress, the courts can employ a legal instrument to force the production of evidence and testimony. The Government of India Act of 1935 allowed for the establishment of the Federal Court of India, a court with original, appellate, and advisory jurisdiction. Up until 1950, when the Supreme Court of India was constituted, it was in operation.
To learn more about federal court click,
https://brainly.com/question/29615892
#SPJ4
what part of the constitution details the judicial branch?
Article III of the constitution details the judicial branch.
Article III of the Constitution, which established the Judicial Branch, gives Congress broad authority to shape and govern the federal courts. Even the number of Supreme Court Justices is determined by Congress.
There have been as few as six at times, and the current number (nine, with one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices) has only been in place since 1869.
The Constitution also allows Congress the authority to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court; to that aim, Congress established the United States district courts, which hear the majority of federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals, which hear appeals from district courts.
Federal judges can only be removed by impeachment and conviction in the House of Representatives.
To know more about judicial branch:
https://brainly.com/question/9696040
#SPJ4
Match the three basic tax planning strategies with their description:
i. Timing
ii. Income Shifting
iii. Conversion
a. Accelerating tax deductions and deferring the recognition of taxable income.
b. Moving income and deductions from taxpayers in one tax bracket to taxpayers in a different tax bracket.
c. Changing the type of income to a more tax-favored form of income.
Tax planning refers to the process of organizing and structuring one's financial affairs to minimize tax liabilities.
i. Timing - a. Accelerating tax deductions and deferring the recognition of taxable income.
ii. Income Shifting - b. Moving income and deductions from taxpayers in one tax bracket to taxpayers in a different tax bracket.
iii. Conversion - c. Changing the type of income to a more tax-favored form of income.
There are three basic tax planning strategies, which include timing, income shifting, and conversion. Timing involves accelerating tax deductions and deferring the recognition of taxable income. For example, individuals may choose to defer receiving bonus income until the following year when they expect to be in a lower tax bracket. Income shifting involves moving income and deductions from taxpayers in one tax bracket to taxpayers in a different tax bracket, such as transferring income-generating assets to a family member in a lower tax bracket. Conversion involves changing the type of income to a more tax-favored form of income, such as converting traditional IRA (individual retirement account) assets to a Roth IRA, which is taxed differently. Tax planning strategies should always be implemented in a legal and ethical manner, and individuals should consult a tax professional for advice and guidance. Ultimately, tax planning can help individuals to reduce their overall tax liabilities, maximize their wealth, and reach their financial goals more efficiently.
Learn more about Tax planning here:
https://brainly.com/question/28330970
#SPJ4
Which BEST explains why gun violence has become a social problem in past decades?
It affects more people and is growing more widespread. Kelvin has a proposal for research on the effects of poverty on academic achievement.
A current problem in regard to human rights is gun violence. The right to life, which is the most fundamental human right, is in danger due to gun violence. Gun violence is a common tragedy that has an impact on people's lives all around the world. Every day, gun violence claims the lives of more than 500 people.
Gun violence can harm anyone, but in some circumstances, it disproportionately affects communities of color and other acts of vulnerable groups in society.
Guns can often cause people to feel threatened and afraid for their lives, which can have serious and lasting psychological impacts on both individuals and entire communities. Fear of gun violence can also have a detrimental effect on people's ability to access healthcare and education.
Learn more about gun violence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29452030
#SPJ4