How can a strong national government affect races to the bottom?
a. Oppose higher standards than states facing competition are able to
b. organize and structures Interstate commercial bids for Corporations
c. legislatures against competition between states to ensure a strong economy
d. protects and enforces regulations against Corporation by using the threat of exit

Similar safeguards are provided by the Texas Bill of Rights, however they are written in a more positive manner. But it also transcends any federal safeguards. For example, Section 3a specifically forbids discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.

In several crucial areas, the Texas Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights are very different. The Texas Bill of Rights differs from the US Bill of Rights in several ways, the first being that it is included in Article I of the Texas Constitution as opposed to the US Bill of Rights, which is composed of the first ten amendments to the US Constitution. The Texas Bill of Rights contains 33 distinct rights as opposed to the US Bill of Rights' ten complex rights, making it a different document from the US one. The Texas Bill of Rights is written in terms of positive rights as opposed to the US Bill of Rights, which is presented in terms of negative liberties.

Learn more about Texas Bill of Rights: https://brainly.com/question/16237105

#SPJ1

Political division among lawmakers, who had different opinions on how much election law revision was necessary to address COVID-19 concerns, was one significant challenge. Moreover, legal "rewriting

Rewriting election rules to take COVID-19 and the 2020 presidential election into consideration was extremely challenging for Rewriting Political division among lawmakers, who had differing opinions on how much election law revision was necessary to address COVID-19 issues, was one of the main obstacles. This resulted in heated discussions and the failure of new laws to pass. The process was made more difficult by legal issues and disagreements on state authorities' power to alter electoral rules. Due to these problems, it was challenging for lawmakers to reach agreement and pass significant election law amendments in time for the 2020 presidential election, emphasising the necessity for bipartisan collaboration in resolving other election-related concerns.

Learn more about "rewriting here:

https://brainly.com/question/29207491

#SPJ4

Out of the given alternatives, it may be stated that the Southerners were not able to maintain the level of unity in the People's Party due to the lack of coordination that they had. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The People's Party was formed with an intention to bring the people together in a unified goal towards the development of the American society. However, the southerners, or people from the southern states, were not in a sense of unity that also took a toll on their coordination lacking.

Learn more about the People's Party here:

https://brainly.com/question/28642127

#SPJ4

The correct option is B ; Fifth , The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, on the other hand, states that "nor shall private property be seized for public purpose without reasonable compensation.

" As a result, once the United States acquires a property through eminent domain, it has a constitutional obligation to compensate the property owner fairly for the land's fair market worth. The First Amendment guaranteed freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition.

According to the Fifth Amendment, no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, employs the same eleven words to express a legal requirement of all states.

Learn more about Amendment

https://brainly.com/question/12124635

#SPJ4

Jefferson included a) a. list of grievances against King George the Third in the Declaration of Independence in order to convince the colonists and their European powers to break with Great Britain

To persuade the colonies and European powers of the legitimacy of the American fight for independence, Thomas Jefferson included a list of grievances against King George III and the British government in the Declaration of Independence. The list of complaints was meant to show how the colonists' natural rights, such as their right to life, liberty, and property, had been frequently violated by the British authority. The complaints included, among other things, concerns about taxation without representation, infringements on the right to a jury trial, and housing soldiers in private residences.

Jefferson outlined these complaints in an effort to demonstrate that the American colonies had exhausted all possibilities for a peaceful settlement with Britain and that independence was required to safeguard their rights and liberties. The United States eventually won the Revolutionary War, and Great Britain and other European nations recognised its independence as a result. The Declaration of Independence was a potent statement that helped galvanise support for the American cause both within the colonies and overseas.

Complete Question:

Which of the following did Jefferson include in the Declaration of Independence in order to convince the colonists and their European powers to break with Great Britain was both necessary and Justified?

a) a list of grievances against King George the Third

b) The basic components of a constitution are the system

c) The Preamble to the Constitution

d) Mission of the government

Read more about the Declaration of Independence on:

https://brainly.com/question/9515546

#SPJ4

The primary purpose or the intention of the filibuster powers in the United States' Senate is to restrict the vote on a measure to be taken in the United States Legislative Assembly.

The filibuster power can be referred to or considered as the powers granted to each and every senate in the United States Legislative Assembly, wherein they can put a never-ending debate on a topic, and allow a majority to block from voting for a measure or a decision, or at least threaten from doing the same in its essence.

Learn more about filibuster powers here:

https://brainly.com/question/30656692

#SPJ4

The correct option is Option D

Rational-basis test is the lowest standard of review used to determine whether a classification violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In the United States, rational basis review is the standard of review that courts use when evaluating constitutional issues, such as due process or equal protection challenges under the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments.

Laws that affect people based on their race, for example, are subject to stringent scrutiny and must be justified by the government with solid reasons.

Constitution was replaced the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, in 1789. It began with seven articles that set the national framework and government constraints.

For such more question on Rational-basis:

https://brainly.com/question/27880846

#SPJ4

The nineteenth amendment of the American Constitution means that every American citizen will hold rights and protection against being denied for voting based on their gender or sexual discrimination.

The voting rights have been included as the fundamental rights of the American citizens under the 19th amendment of the National Constitution of the United States of America. Thus, there have been a number of instances wherein the citizens were sexually discriminated from voting, and thus, this amendment was enforced in the year 1920.

Learn more about 19th amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/30765158

#SPJ4

The clause that states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws is the Supremacy Clause. This clause is the Constitution's one of the most significant structural provision.

This clause states that the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the United States of America and shall supersede any statute, state laws or regulations when there is a conflict between the two.

However, if any law says that the State must comply with it and that no other law be it federal laws cannot supersede them then that law must be complied with as it says. Till this day, the Supreme Court relies heftily on this clause in deciding cases with conflict.

To know more about Supremacy Clause

https://brainly.com/question/13839329?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The Alien and Sedition Acts, which were passed by the United States Congress in 1798, restricted the freedom of speech and the press.

The Alien and Sedition Acts, approved by the United States Congress in 1798, limited freedom of expression and the press. The Sedition Act, in instance, made "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" against the government or its officers a crime, and was used to prosecute those who attacked the Federalist Party or its policies. As a result, the Alien and Sedition Acts curtailed and limited political engagement that included criticizing the government and its acts, especially through the press.

For such more question on Sedition:

https://brainly.com/question/30633240

#SPJ4

The law of autonomous assortment states that during gamete formation, alleles from various genes assort separately. This law comes into play during meiosis.

Meiosis involves a diverse group of cells. During the procedure, these divided, haploid chromosomes were produced. Grasp the law of autonomous assortment requires an understanding of the rule of segregation. This gives various gamete cells access to two unique genes. Mendel's independent assortment law states that the alleles of two or more distinct genes are independently selected into gametes. In other words, the allele for one gene does not change in a gamete when it acquires an allele for another gene.

To learn more about meiosis, click at:

https://brainly.com/question/3565757

#SPJ4

Option B is correct - Because the states have powers reserved to them by the Constitution, the United States does not have a unitary form of government.

The US government relies on the federal system to run because it allows the federal government and the states to share power. This decentralised system's multiple levels of administration ensure that no level of government has excessive power and that each state is able to address issues particular to its own citizens.

The federal structure also offers a system of checks and balances, with each level of government acting as a check on the others. This will prevent the abuse of power and ensure that no individual or group has an undue influence on the decision-making process.

Learn  more about " Constitution " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ4

Few aspects New England law is particularly known for are historical significance, excellence in legal education, public interest law, maritime law, constitutional law, etc.

New England is known for having several prestigious law schools and a strong legal tradition.

1. Historical significance: New England is home to some of the oldest law schools in the United States, including Harvard Law School, which was founded in 1817.

Many of these institutions have played important roles in the development of American jurisprudence.

2. Excellence in legal education: New England law schools are known for providing high-quality legal education, often with a strong emphasis on practical training.

3. Public interest law: Many New England law schools have a strong commitment to public interest law and social justice.

4. Maritime law: Due to the region's history and geography, New England has a strong tradition in maritime law.

5. Constitutional law: New England has a long history of producing legal scholars and practitioners who specialize in constitutional law.

This is due in part to the region's connection to some of the most important constitutional debates in American history, such as the drafting of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia and the adoption of the Bill of Rights.

To know more about New England here:

https://brainly.com/question/28186334

#SPJ4

Kepler's third law states that the square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit. This law is important because it allowed us to determine the mass of planets, which in turn, helped us calculate the mass of the Sun. It also helped us understand that planets move in elliptical orbits around the Sun and not in circles.

It is important because it relates the period of a planet's orbit to its distance from the sun. This law, also known as the Harmonic Law, states that the square of the period of a planet's orbit is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the sun. Mathematically, this can be represented as P² ∝ a³, where P is the period of the orbit and a is the average distance from the sun.

This law is important because it allows astronomers to calculate the distance of a planet from the sun based on its orbital period, or vice versa. This is useful for studying the solar system and for understanding the behavior of planets and other celestial bodies. Additionally, Kepler's third law has been used to estimate the masses of stars and to discover exoplanets, or planets outside of our solar system.

Overall, Kepler's third law is an important tool for astronomers and has helped to further our understanding of the universe.

For more such questions on Kepler's third law.

https://brainly.com/question/1608361#

#SPJ11

when presented with evidence of discrimination, an employer in a disparate impact case needs to show that the employment practice is a business necessity.

Business necessity is used to justify an employers employment criteria in a company which disproportionately affects a group of individuals. The justification implies that the company has legitimate reasons to operate under such barred employment environment. It substantially affects employers need in the company and work assigned to him. Every business has different position of employment and each position is differentiated in need and skill of the employees, the employees have to set according to the business and its needs so that business can grow significantly.

To know more about "Business necessity" visit-

brainly.com/question/16944534

#SPJ4

The concept of selective incorporation means that the Court has held the provisions of a Bill of Rights in order to limit or restrict the activities undertaken by the state governments.

The doctrine of selective incorporation is given under the Supreme Court's power to make a law or pass a bill that embraces the restrictive activities or powers that are already held under the full capacities of the states governments in the Americas. The provisions of selective incorporation are based on case-by-case methods.

Learn more about selective incorporation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29617399

#SPJ4

The case of the Zodiac Killer, a serial killer roaming around Northern California in the 1960s and 70s is still an unsolved mystery where the prime suspect was Arthur Leigh Allen.

There are a number of evidence that are for and against Arthur Leigh Allen.

The killer used to often communicate with the police. The letters were written through a Royal typewriter, with the elite type. The same typewriter was found in possession of Allen.

There was a type of bomb that the killer talked about in his letters. A sketch of a similar kind of bomb was found at Allen's residence.

A victim and survivor of Zodiac killer had identified Allen in a lineup.

A DNA print that was found in one of the letters, did not match Allen's.

Allen's handwriting did not match that of the serial killer's.

To know more about the Zodiac Killer visit

https://brainly.com/question/29318851

#SPJ4

No, the situation of a website listing creative Insults about President Obama.Is not indigenous as it violates the principle of respect for public officers and the President's right to privacy and class.

The First Amendment is applicable to this situation, which protects freedom of speech and expression.The First Amendment doesn't cover speech that's intended to harm or defame someone differently. Public officers have a right to privacy and quality that can be violated by similar insults.

Thus, creating such a website would be considered vulnerable speech under the First Amendment. Any attempt to harm or defame public officials isn't defended by the Constitution.

To learn more about First Amendment:

https://brainly.com/question/26448398

#SPJ4

The transference differs from the concept of countertransference in a way that the former is related to the emotional reaction of the client, whereas, the latter is related to the emotional behavior of the therapist.

The concept of countertransference can be referred to or considered as the one wherein the client experiences emotional reactions by the therapist in a session of counseling that they both are involved in. The concept of countertransference is completely in contrast to that of the transference, wherein the emotional reactions are given by the client itself.

Learn more about countertransference here:

https://brainly.com/question/30462452

#SPJ4

Option (c), When both the state and the federal governments have a certain amount of power, there are concurrent powers.

Concurrent powers are those that the federal and state governments both possess. This includes the power to impose taxes, build roads, and set up lower courts.

The federal system of governance with state governments sharing power is known as federalism. All states are subject to national jurisdiction, but states are only sovereign inside their own borders. The American Revolution is where federalism first emerged.

Concurrent responsibilities include writing legislation, putting it into effect, keeping track of it, and evaluating performance, for instance. Housing, agriculture, social welfare, and education are among the matters that fall under the joint jurisdiction of the federal and provincial administrations.

Learn more about concurrent powers: https://brainly.com/question/2459928

#SPJ1

The questions seems to be incomplete. I have gone ahead to explain what could be seen as suspicious activity in the society

Suspicious activities refer to behaviors or actions that are deemed unusual, deviant, or potentially criminal in nature. These activities may be observed or reported by individuals and could include things like unusual purchases, unattended packages, strange behavior or appearance, loitering, or attempts to gain access to restricted areas. Suspicious activities may raise concerns for public safety or security

Read more on suspicious activities https://brainly.com/question/26974108

#SPJ1

$2 million was chosen because it was impossible to determine how much of the damage the snowboarder was responsible for.

Due to the snowboarder's joint and several liability for the injury, the skier may recover $2 million from the snowboarder. According to the doctrine of joint and several liability, each defendant will be held jointly and severally liable for any harm that the plaintiff suffers as a result of two or more tortious acts acting together to cause. This means that the plaintiff may seek payment from any defendant for the full amount of his damages. The doctrine holds true even when each tortfeasor took different steps and acted on their own. Here, the skier's right to reasonable care was violated by both the snowboarder and a resort employee.

The skier's disability was actually caused by both of the tortfeasors' actions because without either of them, his leg would not have become permanently disabled. Because the disability was a direct result of the snowboarder's act, that act was the proximate cause of the skier's disability. The extent of the harm was unpredictable, so it doesn't matter; the tortfeasor must treat the victim as he finds him. The skier can therefore sue the snowboarder for the full $2 million.

Learn  more about " snowboarder's " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/149121

#SPJ4

Complete Question -

What amount of damages can the skier recover from the snowboarder for his permanent disability?

A $1 million, because the jurisdiction follows comparative contribution rules.

B $2 million, because it was not possible to identify the portion of the injury that the snowboarder caused.

C Nothing for his permanent disability, because the skier has not met his burden of proof as to the amount of damages that the snowboarder caused.

D Nothing for his permanent disability, because the injury inflicted by the snowboarder, by itself, would not have caused the disability.

The supremacy clause states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws.

The Supremacy Clause  is present is Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It declares that federal law, including the constitution, supersedes state legislation and even state constitutions.

States are forbidden from interfering with how the federal government exercises its constitutional authority or from taking on any duties that belong solely to the federal government.

However, it does not give the federal government the ability to examine or veto state legislation prior to their implementation.

The Supremacy Clause solely concerns the legal status of the laws that other provisions of the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact, as well as the legal status of treaties and the Constitution itself.

To know more about the Supremacy clause, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13839329

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Executive Branch appoints Justices to the Supreme Court.

Explanation:

Members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President subject to the approval of the Senate.

Hope it helps:)

In the above situation, it can be seen that the shareholders can file an action that would require the directors to make the declaration of a dividend, in case they refuse to declare a dividend. Therefore, the option B holds true.

A dividend may be considered as the part of return that the shareholders get as a part of their faith and investment shown in the company over a regular course of business operations of the companies. The declaration of dividend lies in the hands of the directors, however, the shareholders also have powers because of the ownership that they hold in that company.

Learn more about dividend here:

https://brainly.com/question/29510262

#SPJ4

the method of recording depreciation that is typically noted in the summary of material accounting policies note

The summary of significant accounting policies provides details on significant accounting practises, such as revenue recognition, depreciation methods, and inventory costing. A wide range of operational and financial policies, such as those pertaining to cash, receivables, intangible assets, asset impairment, inventory valuation, different types of liabilities, revenue recognition, and capitalised costs, may be included in the policy summary. The reporting entity should disclose material accounting principles used. Such disclosure should list and explain the accounting principles that have a significant impact on how financial position, operational results, or cash flow changes are determined.

Learn more about "  accounting policies    " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/24215375

#SPJ4

It is true to say that governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products.

In the midst of customers' rising dietary enhancement use, which spiked during the Coronavirus pandemic, Congresspersons Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Mike Braun (R-IN) presented bipartisan regulation on April 26 that would give the Food and Medication Organization (FDA) — the government can protect consumers by putting ban on unsafe products — more noteworthy perceivability into the items available. Seat urges Congress to quickly authorize the bill and guarantee the security and nature of all enhancements available.

As per a Seat review, barely any individuals comprehend FDA's momentum restricted job in directing the business. The organization misses the mark on capacity to be aware with assurance what dietary enhancement items are arriving at shoppers and what's in them. Existing regulation puts the onus on FDA to filter reports of damage from purchasers, specialists, and organizations.

To know more about consumer protection,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/27305515

#SPJ4

The answer to the statement "Drag and drop the appropriate words to complete the following: Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the performance of an action that one is otherwise not obligated to undertake. Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the refraining from an action that one has a legal right to undertake (called a forbearance)."

The term obligation refers to the responsibility to do or not do 3something. Obligation is a civil law notion in its legal sense. An obligation can be formed willingly, such as by a contract, quasi-contract, or unilateral pledge.

Nowadays, it also denotes that one or more parties(obligates) are obligated to execute or refrain from undertaking specified behavior (prestation).

In the legal meaning, abstain is to stop from doing, experiencing, or indulging in anything, especially from acting on a momentary inclination. It also includes preventing someone from doing any act or doing anything in order to carry out such an instruction.

To know more about contract

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ4

It is not burdensome for a business to comply with the law. This statement is false.

A law is a formal written enactment of a legislative body that, with the cooperation of other parties, governs the legal entities of a city, state, or nation.

Cases must adhere to the precedents of other such cases in related jurisdictions under the principle of stare decisis. Because the U.S. Supreme Court is the country's highest court, all states are bound by its rulings.

Legislative authority is separated into three categories. Union list, concurrent list, and state list. While statutory laws are the fundamental legal structure needed by the contemporary legal system. Additionally, there are two different sorts of the legislature: subordinate legislation and supreme legislation.

To know more about Legislative authority, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/28500697

#SPJ4