During the Renaissance period, the
form of music known as the
madrigal was
A. developed in England.
B. developed in America.
C. developed in Russia.

During the Renaissance period, the form of music known as the madrigal was primarily developed in Italy. The madrigal was a secular vocal composition that gained popularity in the 16th century.

The option (D) is correct.

It was characterized by its polyphonic texture, expressive use of text, and intricate vocal harmonies. The madrigal form reached its peak in Italy, particularly in cities like Florence and Venice, where composers such as Monteverdi and Gesualdo contributed significantly to its development.

While the madrigal form did spread to other European countries, including England, America, and Russia, its origins and most influential contributions can be traced back to Italy during the Renaissance period.

Learn more about Renaissance:

https://brainly.com/question/32861735

#SPJ2

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

During the Renaissance period, the form of music known as the madrigal was;

A. developed in England.

B. developed in America.

C. developed in Russia.

d.  developed in Italy.

answer the questions in the picture please 100 points if you do

Shorten this and put it in your own words


Around the year 133 BC, Rome was set up as a democracy. Later the Roman people were sovereign. Even the system of voting was weighted to give more influence to the votes of the wealthy. By 14 AD, when the first emperor Augustus died, popular elections had all but disappeared. This was nothing short of a revolution, brought about through a century of constant civil strife, and sometimes open warfare. Many Romans themselves put the key turning point in 133 BC. The course of events is clear enough.In the process, he deposed from office another tribune who opposed the distribution and argued that his reforms should be funded from the money that came from the new Roman imperial province of Asia. Gracchus's land bill was passed. Gracchus's motivation is much less clear. Whatever his motives were, his career crystallised many of the main issues that were to underlie the revolutionary politics of the next hundred years.The consequences of Rome's growing empire were crucial. Tiberius's decision to use the revenues of Asia for his land distribution was a provocative claim - that the poor as well as the rich should enjoy the fruits of Rome's conquests. But Tiberius's desire to stand for a second tribunate also raised questions of personal political dominance. This became an increasingly urgent issue as leading men in the first century BC, such as Julius Caesar, were sometimes given vast power to deal with the military threats facing Rome from overseas - and then proved unwilling to lay down that power when they returned to civilian life. The events of 133 BC were followed by a series of intensifying crises. At the end of the century Gaius Marius, a stunningly successful soldier, defeated enemies in Africa, Gaul and finally in Italy, when Rome's allies in Italy rebelled against her.He held the highest office of state, the consulship, no fewer than seven times, an unprecedented level of long-term dominance of the political process. Marius then came into violent conflict with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, another Roman warlord, who after victories in the east actually marched on Rome in 82 BC and established himself 'dictator'.This had been an ancient Roman office designed to give a leading politician short terms powers in an emergency.Unlike Julius Caesar, however, who was to become dictator 40 years later, Sulla retired from the office and died in his bed.The middle years of the first century BC were marked by violence in the city, and fighting between gangs supporting rival politicians and political programmes.The two protagonists were Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus ('Pompey the Great', as he was called, after Alexander the Great) and Julius Caesar.Caesar promoted radical policies in the spirit of Tiberius Gracchus; Pompey had the support of the traditionalists.Historians in both the ancient and modern world have devoted enormous energy to tracking the precise stages by which these two men came head-to-head in civil war. But the fact is that, given the power each had accrued and their entrenched opposition, war between them was almost inevitable. Not much 'liberty' was to follow. Instead there was another decade of civil war as Caesar's supporters first of all battled it out with his assassins, and when they had been finished off, fought among themselves.

Write TWO paragraphs describing John Marshall and the Supreme Court made the United States Constitution and the National Government the supreme law of the land.

4. How was the Espionage Act
amended in 1918 (Sedition
Act)? Discuss the changes.

I hate ap world sm okurrrr

Bakit mahalagang matutuhan ang pagtukoy at pagpapaliwanag sa mahahalagang detalye, mensahe at kaisipan ng isang akdang pampanitikan?

John Adams still believed that the term “massacre” was appropriate. Even though he was the defense attorney, what is his reason for making such a statement?

What is meant by the "GOLD STANDARD"?​

what was the first tree displayed at the white house

Compare the 1830 and 1850 census information. What changes do you see?
PLS HELP!!!

the american hostages were held in the u.s. embassy in teheran by their iranian captors

PLS HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLSSSSSSSSS

Select the TWO African regions on the map that remained independent through the nineteenth century.

a
25. People out of work and looking for a job

Great Britain began colonizing Australia late in which century?
A.
16th
B.
17th
C.
18th
D.
19th

Which similarity existed between the religious practices of the Maya and Aztec in MesoAmerica?

quem eram os vassalos

When was the gold rush.

Is James Horn’s assertion that “Jamestown also presents two sides of America’s founding. On the one hand, England’s New World offered many settlers opportunities for social and economic advancement unthinkable at home; while on the other, colonization unleashed powerful destructive forces that were catastrophic for Indian peoples, whose lands were taken by colonists, and for enslaved Africans and their posterity, whose labor enabled Jamestown, and indeed America, to flourish” true? Why or why not?

Pls help Between meetings, members of Congress________

What was the effect of adding Texas and California to the union?

PLEASE HELP THANK YOU SO MUCH!!

how did the Three Estates act as a cause of the French Revolution

2.) What native chief opposed American expansion and aimed to stop it?

a.) Blue Jacket
b.) Tecumseh
c.) The Prophet
d.) Chief Joseph

Brainliest for the best awnser!
You examined the factors that contributed to the decline of the medieval period. In a two-paragraph response answer the following questions using evidence from the unit. Make sure to follow the C.E.R. writing format.
What does it mean that the Middle Ages “declined”? Provide a few examples of this happening from the unit.

How did events and conditions in the Middle Ages set the stage for the Renaissance and the modern era?

On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated: A. while in Dallas supporting a garbage workers' strike. B. as he launched the Poor People's Campaign. C. and while the nation mourned his death, there was no violence. D. and Congressional support for the Open Housing Act declined. E. and no one was ever charged with the crime.

when two sides of an international conflict possess such enormous arsenals of nuclear missiles that each has the ability to destroy the other in the event of war, it is called

Who led the third Crusade?

Richard the Lionhearted

Stephen of France

Pop Urban II

Peter the Hermit

what is meant by " Reagan Doctrine"?

why was there a rise of dictators in europe and asia during the 1930s?

how old was winter the dolphin when she passed away