Answer:
Explanation:
I believe the toughest conflicts to resolve are the ones in which you must make a choice, but all the options contain an element that seems to violate a value that is important to you. It is difficult to do the right thing when the “perfect” right thing is not among the choices you seem to face.
I was indicted, to my complete surprise, in May 2003. I was charged by the DOJ with 20 counts of criminal wrongdoing, all associated (somehow) with lying about technology. The charges seemed inexplicable to me, so I resolved to fight them even though I was offered many opportunities to enter into deals with the DOJ. The problem with the deals was that, even though I was told by everyone that they were “favorable” towards me, they required me to lie about something. It wasn’t the punishment that bothered me as much as being asked to lie.
Therefore, I fought the DOJ tooth and nail for nine years. I gave up my life savings (everything that was not frozen by the DOJ), my home, my family time, my social life, etc. to defend myself. To stretch my resources, I made my defense a full-time job, doing as much work myself as I could manage in order to save on legal fees. I worked seven days a week, learning the law, researching my case, helping to draft motions and briefs, preparing for trial, etc.
I endured a 3 1/2-month trial in 2005 and beat the DOJ. After the trial, through jury and court decisions, 14 of the original 20 counts were acquitted; all that was left were six counts on which the jury had hung. Instead of dismissing the remaining counts after their trial defeat, the DOJ re-indicted me on the six hung counts. I then went through two long appeal processes [to get the six hung counts dismissed]; both appeals made it as far as petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court. But, ultimately, the Supreme Court did not hear my appeals, so it was on toward a second trial.
I dedicated myself to preparation for the re-trial. By this time, it was no longer simply a personal struggle. The DOJ continued to offer deals, but I felt that I had a mission to defeat the DOJ again at trial. I had seen too much in the justice process that was not honorable and not right. And I felt that the system would never get better if people like me, who had the resources and temperament to fight, gave up in favor of a deal. The DOJ deserved to get defeated decisively and publicly at trial. I was ready and eager for trial, with more than three dozen witnesses, including the most credible people available — my attorneys told me that they had never before seen a more impressive group of witnesses. I desperately wanted my day in court.
But then I ran out of money. And this is where the conflict arose.
I could borrow money from people who freely offered it to me to continue my defense. Or I could accept a deal with the DOJ, by this time a quite “reasonable” deal. Neither choice was good. The deal stuck in my craw because it was a contrivance intended mainly to offer an easy way out for the DOJ, essentially a negotiated mutual cease fire rather than a rational settlement. But borrowing money was all but unthinkable to me — I could not stomach the idea of using other people’s money to defend myself — I did not want to spread the terrible financial impact of my indictment beyond myself and, most certainly, not to good friends.
Ultimately, I chose the deal. I simply could not ask others to accept a financial risk on my behalf when a deal was being offered by the DOJ that everybody told me was extremely favorable to me. I felt that using other people’s money to fight the DOJ would be self-indulgent, given the other options on the table. So my resolution was to accept the deal offered by the DOJ.
The truth is that I am not sure that this conflict has been resolved. I will always feel that I let others down, others caught in the same kind of insane trap which had ensnared me, by not seeing the fight through and finally beating the DOJ again at trial, decisively and publicly. Such a defeat might have helped those others in a way that a hollow deal cannot. Therefore, while I made a decision which ended one conflict, it really only launched another, and more intense, internal conflict which will be with me forever.
[You can read about the struggles of Rex Shelby and other Enron Broadband executives in two recently published books: Blogging Enron: The Enron Broadband Story by author and blogger, Cara Ellison; and Acquittal: An Insider Reveals the Stories and Strategies Behind Today’s Most Infamous Verdicts by prominent trial consultant, Richard Gabriel.
If you enjoyed Rex’s essay, please Recommend and Share it. And if you have questions or comments, please use the Notes feature here on Medium, or visit the Rumble Press Forums for a more in-depth discussion of the essay. You can also Follow Rumble Press on Medium for additional essays and stories. Thank you!]
How does Orwell use Squealer's explanation to support
his purpose?
O Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics is
representative of a dictator who reverses policies and
lies about his reasons.
O Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics is meant
to shed light on why it is often necessary for dictators
to lie to their people.
O. Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics
demonstrates a connection between Napoleon and
Squealer That was not previously clear.
O Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics reveals
a connection with Stalin's intent to do what was right
for his people.
Answer:
A). Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics is a representative of a dictator who reverses policies and lies about his reasons.
Explanation:
Orwell's 'Animal Farm' primarily functions to stairize Stalinism and critique the exaggerated power of the dictator Joseph Stalin. He provides Squealer's explanation to elaborate the 'tactics used by the Napolean in order to expose the dark side of the dictators who keep moulding their policies as well as lies in order to serve their own selfish purposes.' It helps Orwell to convey his message to the readers that the power makes people corrupt and dominating. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
After reading "Animal Farm," we can choose the following option concerning how Orwell uses Squealer's explanation:
A. Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics is representative of a dictator who reverses policies and lies about his reasons.
Who are Squealer and Napoleon?Squealer and Napoleon are characters in "Animal Farm," more specifically pigs who control the other animals of the farm after kicking out their human owner.The two characters are used to represent how unfair the Soviet revolution was in Russia. Napoleon represents Stalin, while Squealer is the spreader of false propaganda.When Squealer talks to the other animals and says the Napoleon was the one who had the idea of building the windmill - when it was in fact Snowball -, he is representing the use of false information by dictators.Dictators lie to their people and reverse their policies, always with the purpose of benefiting themselves. But they make it seem as if they care about their people.With the information above in mind, we can choose letter A as the best option.
Learn more about "Animal Farm" here:
https://brainly.com/question/11752825
In some parts of the United States, students are being encouraged to start thinking about how to get into college when they are in middle school or even grade school. Some high-school students and parents agree that starting early to prepare for college and career is essential, while others argue that starting too soon may contribute to burnout.
Do you feel that you should have started earlier to prepare for college, or do you agree with those who feel that high-school students now face a "college admissions frenzy"? Write a statement addressing students and parents at your school, making a strong case either for or against getting an early start on college planning. Remember to anticipate and answer opposing viewpoints.
Answer:
Collage has always been the one way of life for school. Each year we force college as the only way to get a good job or for a "proper education". Yes, college is great for people who want to go the increased education or Special degrees. Though for some people college can just blow up in their face, whether it is the fact they are unprepared or they just don't learn that way. What we need to understand is that each person is different and has different ways of learning. Some times the best education is taking vocational education. We need to make it an option for children at a young age, telling them that's it okay not to go to college.
Explanation:
A paragraph's supporting sentences provide a. specific details. b. explanations. c. evidence. d. all of these choices.
Answer:
d. all of these choices.
Explanation:
The paragraph related to some topic that support the sentences provide the particular details, explanation and the evidence to proof something
So here in the given situation the correct option is d. as it involved these three things i.e. details about specific topic, explanation, and the proof
Therefore the option d is correct
2
Next
Evaluating a Film Adaptation: Mastery Test
2.
Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs.
Match each element of performance to its description.
the skill of portraying fictional or
nonfictional characters in performances
project
the manner in which
actors speak their lines
acting
the act of speaking
loudly and clearly
delivery
Answer:
Acting : the skill of portraying fictional or non-fictional characters in performance
Delivery : the manner in which actors speak their lines
Project : the act of speaking loudly and clearly
Read-through : a process during which actors practice reading their lines out loud in front of the director
Explanation:
Got it correct on test.
Answer:
Acting : the skill of portraying fictional or non-fictional characters in performance
Delivery : the manner in which actors speak their lines
Project : the act of speaking loudly and clearly
Read-through : a process during which actors practice reading their lines out loud in front of the director
I hope this helps
Taco squce
$1.39 for. 10oz
Reflect on your one act play. What do you think you did well? What do you wish you could do better, or had done better? In general, what type of errors do you tend to make in writing? (spelling, commas, etc.)
Answer:
commas
Explanation:
why ask
please help me!
do you think the Sadhu satisfied his life for the sake of animals in the forest?
give reason for your answer
please mark as brainliest
are u from tamilnadu sis️
Editing and revising are part of the writing process. In 3-4 sentences, describe the difference between the two. Please help me and thank you! 15 points and brainliest!
Answer:
The description, and according to the frame of reference, is summed up below.
Explanation:
I would therefore probably consider composing to have been the clarification as well as acknowledgment of errors through a dissertation as well as a worksheet. During which the revised version will indeed improve and increase on concepts that have already been transcribed. Besides obvious reasons, throughout fact necessary to provide a draft version of my dissertation, I'd have had to modify that one to consider removing paragraphs that just don't ring true as well as assign exclamation marks to locations that I neglected to mention.And therefore whenever I go up later to rewrite my document, I'm looking to experience and then go up later to ideologies something which I might not have involved all that much about.
If you were marooned on a deserted island, how do you think you would do? Would you survive? How would you cope with the situation? Would you enjoy the freedom?
Answer:c
Explanation:
Answer:
if you brought water and food you would servived if you did not you would not servived
Explanation:
Add an appropriate question tag to the following sentences:
1] My friend is coming,__________?
2] He can swim well, __________?
3] I am going to his house tomorrow,________?
4] People love being appreciated,_________?
5] Let’s work together,_________?
6] Nothing was wrong,________?
7] All is well,_________?
8]They used to fight,________?
9] Those are my books, _________?
10] She never gets angry,_________?
11] They’re at home yesterday,_______?
12] We must go into this matter,________?
13] Let me do it for you,________?
14] Never give up,________?
15] You’d better complete it first,_________?
16] They’d leave that place,_________?
17] Nobody dares to talk to him,________?
18] Barsha has never been abroad,_______?
19] Somebody is at the door,_______?
20] They have a bunny in their house,_______?
Answer:
1. out
2. no doubt
3. night
4.that's right
5. we go so well
6. I was just feeling down
7. with love and war
8. about nothing
9. why do you have them
10. she's to nice
11. there doing fine
12. together
13. call it a favor
14. your dreams
15. or you'll fail
16. they hate it
17. he's a killer
18. sailing the sea
19. don't let them in
20. who's crazy
Explanation:
what's another word for irritating used in a sentence like when these things happen, your mucus system starts to make more fluids to wash away the irritating particles.
A. angering
B. bothersome
C. boosting
D. soothing
will give brainlist!!!
Answer:
B. bothersome
Read the passage. Then use the drop-down menus to answer the questions.
What is the tone of the passage?
-suspicious
-admiring
-desperate
Imagine that the word masterful in the last sentence were changed to good. How would the tone of thebsentence change?
-it would be more neutral.
-it would be more approving.
-it would be more shocked.
1. Desperate, since he need to do a good job or they'll get caught which makes it have a tone of desperation.
2. More neutral, it cant be more approving since "masterful" is way better than "good". It also can't be "shocked" since theres nothing really shocking about the word "good".
Answer:
B. Admiring
A. It would be more neutral
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Read the excerpt below and answer the question.
If any of you refined and Christian readers object to the society into which this scene Introduces them, let us
beg them to begin and conquer their prejudices in the catching business, we beg to remind them, is rising to
the dignity of a lawful and patriotic profession. If all the broad land between the Mississippi and the Pacific
becomes one great market for bodies and should, and human property retains the locomotive tendencies of
this nineteenth century, the trader and catcher may yet be among our aristocracy. (p.61)
What word best describes the tone of the passage above?
A. comedic
B. joyful
C. outraged
D. ironic
Answer:
The answer is
D- Ironic
Explanation:
got it right on my lesson :)
Example sentence of catalyze
Answer: He'd have to catalyze his healing with adrenaline and other drugs. catalyze phosphorylation of Protein Kinase B activating it. However other enzymes in living material can also catalyze oxidation with the oxygen in air
Explanation: Hope this helps
Think about a story from your life that clearly represents your identity. In the space provided, write a two-paragraph narrative describing that story. Be sure to be as descriptive as possible to truly depict the story to your readers. Also, be sure to use proper sentence structure, spelling, and capitalization.
Think of your own experiences, even things as simple as going to the zoo and finding out you really like monkeys. Describe what you were feeling during that moment and what caused you to understand that. Describe your surroundings too
Answer: As the youngest child of the family I am pictured as the “baby” adding on being born internationally. My story is the story of my journey! This story would have so many islands involved you’d think your in paradise, many family members who have been there that you’d feel like you’re at a family reunion. Onething I can assure you is that this story never gets boring, emotional rollercoasters, unjoyful surprises.
Match the character to his/her description.
Column A
Column B
1.
Lyddie
a. Protagonist
2.
Charlie
b. Kind cook
3.
Triphena
c. Lazy
4.
Willie
d. Trouble maker
5.
Mrs. Bedlow
e. Honest and intelligent
6.
Diana
f. "Mother" in the boarding house
Answer:
nglish sounds strange
English probably sounds a little “weird” to many speakers of other languages. ... English has more phonemes than many languages, with around 44, depending on which variety of English you speak. It has an unusually large set of vowel sounds – there are around 11.Apr 21, 2019
Explanation:
How are the expectations of a high school student different from those of a middle school student?
Answer:
you get more leeway in high school because your about to be an adult so you would on have to do required classes other classes are for fun
Explanation:
Answer: very different
Explanation: you expected to have your work in on time, homework done, passing, to be prepared, to be ready to learn, to be ready for you career, ready to stand in front of the class to present work, ready for those 5 page essays
Alicia has not provided a thesis for her paper. Which of the following should come after sentence 4 to serve as a thesis statement for this paper?
When she explained to her teacher y she didn't do it she said because alicia my mom died
whats a first word book thing like once upon a time but like once upon a time in more modern words
Answer:
One day
I woke up
I found...
Explanation:
Answer:
Maybe,
One hazy morning...Virtually the next day...There once was...A long time ago...Decades later...From the context of the passage, what is the meaning of acquisition?
Answer:
what is the passage lol
Explanation:
Oliver is writing an essay that supports banning vending machines with candy and soft drinks in schools. Which
statement is a logical fallacy?
O Teachers and staff do not believe that a candy ban is necessary.
O Allowing candy and soft drinks in school will lead to more students skipping class.
O One study showed that kids who drink soft drinks in school are less likely to do well on tests.
O Students who avoid eating candy at school feel more energetic, focused, and excited to learn.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
it's contradicting what he believes in
Answer:
It's B, Allowing candy and soft drinks in school will lead to more students skipping class.
Explanation:
It's B because it is a logical fallacy. The logical fallacy used in this sentence is a slippery slope. A slippery slope is when someone says that something will lead to a bad result without providing evidence.
Examples:
"When coca-cola goes out of business, a great depression will occur."
"I know for a fact that when Wal-mart and Microsoft partner up, Target will go out of business."
"Chick-fil-a has a new chicken sandwich coming out, and I'm sure people will storm chick-fil-a and burn it because it is disgusting because I know this."
do you think stop-and-frisk is an effective or ineffective policing tactic?
Answer:
Definately effective.
Explanation:
Seems to be stopping people from taking weapons where they shouldn't be now, so why should they change it?
Based on a comparison of the myths "The Genealogies and Origins in New Zealand" The Raven and The Beginnings of the Haida,"if the Maori and the Haida people decided to create a myth together what would most likely be the value expressed?
Answer:
The myth would have a strong cultural value expressed.
Explanation:
The Maori and Haida myths alone have a strong cultural value, as they represent the beliefs and culture of two ancient civilizations that are very influential in local culture. However, if these two groups created a myth together, the cultural value expressed would be much greater, as the new myth would present a comprehensive view on the beliefs and culture of the people of New Zealand, understanding the duscultures and showing the interaction between them.
Answer:B
Explanation:
What does the word hardy mean in paragraph 2?
funny
healthy
tough
cautious
5. Plagiarism is a major concern only in education.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
reasoning for that is because its against the law.
mark brainliest
There was nothing to stop the advance of man. Huge boars fled at the click of a harness. Wolves would cower in the glens like foxes when they caught that deadly scent. I was filled with a wordless, obscurely murderous unrest. How is Grendel characterized in this passage
Answer:
c) troubled .
Explanation:
The story of "Grendel" as told from the monster's perspective by John Gardner is based on the epic "Beowulf". But this story takes the readers through the eyes of the dreaded monster and presents the story from his perspective.
As given in the excerpt, Grendel knows the dread and fear his presence has on those around him. Whenever he's there, "wolves would cower" and he also admits he's "filled with a wordless, obscurely murderous unrest". This shows Grendel as a troubled monster who feels aloof and can't do anything about it.
Thus, the correct answer is option c.
I NEED HELP ASAP !!!!
What did you do to summarize the story so far? Check all that apply.
I identified important events.
I included important details.
I used my own words.
I remained objective.
Answer:
You just check all that apply? If you did this then just check them off. I am not sure if this is what your asking, or if it is something else. If it isn't tell me in the comments, so I can help you,
Explanation:
Answer:
you can choose any, no wrong answer
Explanation:
Please help me, someone!! I will mark u brainiest and give u 50 points
Answer:
3
Explanation:
the setting of the play
The central idea of the podcast
Answer:
Explanation: the main thing about a podcast would be the type of podcast it is then you can go on from there. if its like comedy you would want to start off with a joke.
What does the suffix- ine mean in the word heroine?
1. Many
2. Young
3. Great
4. Female
Answer:
female
Explanation:
A heroine is a female hero
Answer:
4.
Explanation:
I believe it pertains to feminity. hero is male heroine is female meaning that the one turned the word feminine.