Jackson’s courage to act against a powerful foe saved New Orleans and made him a war hero. He would work against corruption and for reform. He promised to end the national debt and keep the size of the government small.
What did Jackson do during the Battle of New Orleans?Major Colonel Andrew Jackson won the Battle of New Orleans in 1815, commanding a small, ill-equipped force against 8,000 British troops. Jackson rose to prominence.
He marched his troops to New Orleans to protect the city on December 2, 1814. Jackson planned the city's fortifications to prevent a British landing, including the construction of gun batteries, the use of gun boats, and the cutting down of trees to block waterways. He also made a number of questionable decisions.
As a result, it was Jackson's unexpected victory at the Battle of New Orleans in early 1815 that catapulted him into the public consciousness and history. He became known as the "Hero of New Orleans," and he became a national symbol of an emerging American empire.
To know more about New Orleans, visit:
brainly.com/question/18304545
#SPJ9
Conjecture how American history might have changed had andrew jackson been forced to use military might against south carolina.
In the American history might have changed had Andrew Jackson been forced to use military might against south Carolina. The Conjecture is Early Civil War.
What damage was caused to South Carolina by Andrew Jackson?
President Andrew Jackson questioned a state's authority to overturn a federal statute in a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina (commonly referred to as the "Nullification Proclamation") he issued on December 10, 1832.
In response, he sent a Force Bill to Congress, allowing the employment of federal troops in South Carolina to collect tariffs if required.
Therefore, in the American history might have changed had Andrew Jackson been forced to use military might against south Carolina. The Conjecture is Early Civil War.
To know more about the South Carolina by Andrew Jackson, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12537555
#SPJ9
Do you agree or disagree with its limits on free speech of "clear and present danger" test? why?
I believe that the "clear and present danger" standard places restrictions on free expression. While I agree that the right to free speech is an essential one, I also think that it should be regulated and must be weighed against other crucial factors, such public safety. endangers public order and safety.
Write a description of the "clear and present danger" test.In order to establish the parameters of free speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution, the "clear and present danger" test is utilised as a legal norm in the United States. In order to balance the right to free speech with the interests of the government in maintaining public safety, the test was first developed in the seminal case Schenck v. United States (1919).
If speech poses a "clear and present danger" to public order or safety, it may be prohibited under the "clear and present danger" standard. This implies that the government may impose restrictions on communication that constitutes an immediate threat to the community, such as inciting violence or disseminating misleading information about a contagious disease.
Hence, the answer is, I believe that the "clear and present danger" standard places restrictions on free expression. While I agree that the right to free speech is an essential one, I also think that it should be regulated and must be weighed against other crucial factors, such public safety.
To learn more about, "clear and present danger follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27399929
#SPJ1
the events and tactics shown in the image of an African American woman being carried to a police wagon contributed most directly to the passage of which of the following laws
The events and tactics shown in the image of an African American woman being carried to a police wagon contributed most directly to the passage of civil right Act of 1964. Option d
What is the Civil Rights Act of 1964The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was law passed by the congress in 1964 to stop discrimination based on ''race, color, religion, sex, or national origin'' , it also provides the ban on unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations and also forbade the discrimination in any public accommodations and'' federally funded programs'. It also strengthened the enforcement of voting rights and the desegregation of schools.
This was triggered by demonstration in Brooklyn, New York African as an image shown of a American woman, being carried to police patrol wagon
Learn more about The Civil Rights Act of 1964 on
onbrainly.com/question/1094200
#SPJ1
Identify the monarchies that dominated europe and the atlantic world and the newer powers whose influence was expanding.identify the factors that enabled french power to grow during this period.
The factors that allowed French power to develop throughout that period were correct; French national identity was tied to the king. France seems to have been self-sufficient in agriculture correct ;
Incorrect ; France did not experience religious conflict.
The French government encouraged industrial mass production of high-end goods and textiles.
A "protesant wind" stopped Spain's "invincible armada" from attempting to attack England in 1588. put the occurrences that created problems between England and Spain in chronological order
The English throne is passed from Phillip II's wife, Queen Mary, to her protestant half-sister, Elizabeth.
Ireland revolts against protestant English rule, and King Philip II backs them up.
English merchants disrupt Spanish business inside the Americas, and English privateers back stab as well as loot and pillage Spanish treasure ships.
The English government is assisting the Netherlands in their pursuit of independence.
To know more about revolts click here
brainly.com/question/5420552
#SPJ4
Consider the logic in this statement. If Malcolm X believed the Vietnam War was wrong, would that mean he believed all violence was wrong? If he believed it was not right to draft Americans to fight in the nation’s defense abroad, would it be right to “do whatever is necessary” to defend our own people right here in this country?
1 yes 2 no
1 it does not mean that violence is wrong
2 do whatever is necessary means to draft people
Identify two events that helped Octavian to become the only ruler of the Roman Empire.
Julius Caesar named Octavian as his heir.
Octavian successfully defeated his rival Mark Antony in war.
Octavian formed an alliance with the Carthaginian empire.
Julius Caesar was deeply unpopular among the plebeians of Rome.
Emperor Augustus supported Octavian's rise to power.
Answer:
Octavian defeated the forces of Sextus Pompey at the Battle of Naulochus. Octavian gained control of the Roman Senate. Octavian was given the title of Augustus, signifying his rise as the ruler of Rome.
What is NOT true about the New Deal?
a. It brought an end to the Depression.
b. It helped people survive the Depression.
c. It gave more power to the Presidency.
d. It gave more power to the federal government.
The New Deal did not bring an end to the Great Depression, but it did provide a series of relief, recovery, and reform programs that helped people survive the economic crisis. The correct option is a.
What does the New Deal do?As it put people back to work, the New Deal restored a sense of security. It established the foundation for a regulatory state that could safeguard the interests of all Americans, wealthy and not, and so support the economic system's more effective operation.
The New Deal was a set of policies and programs implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his administration in response to the economic crisis of the 1930s. The New Deal aimed to provide relief to the unemployed and those in poverty, stimulate economic recovery, and implement long-term reforms to prevent future economic crises.
Thus, the ideal selection is option a.
Learn more about the New Deal here:
https://brainly.com/question/815650
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements is true?
a.) Historians inspect, but do not
interpret, evidence from the past to
create narratives of past events.
b.) History is not a fixed concept: Ideas
about how to write history change as
the world changes.
c.) Objectivity is not the goal of the
historian because his or her own
perspective is vital to the narrative.
d.) History is separate from the social,
cultural and intellectual environments
in which it is written.
The statement is true is History is not a fixed concept: Ideas about how to write history change as the world changes. Thus the correct option is B.
What is history?Historical analysis is the study of human history as it is presented in the written documents that people have left behind. It contains information on historical people, societies, events, and problems as well as human attempts to understand them.
Since this past never truly changes, history must be rewritten for each new generation. They have been written to appear to be informational databases. There is no going back and changing what has already occurred.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about History, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1462956
#SPJ9
assume the government bureaucrats were in charge of deciding how many pet snakes to produce instead of a free market. fully explain why the government system would likely be less efficient than the free market system
If government bureaucrats were in charge of deciding how many pet snakes to produce, it is likely that the production and distribution of pet snakes would be less efficient than in a free market system.
Why is market economy more effective?A free market enables buyers to find the items they want without discovering the people who provide those products because there is some money to be gained via providing these matchmaking services. Due to the significant reduction in transaction costs for both buyers and sellers, markets become more effective.
Why may a government be necessary in a free market system?When the advantages of a government programme outweigh the disadvantages, there is an economic function for government to perform in a market economy. Governments frequently fund the military, address environmental issues, define and safeguard property rights, and work to increase competition in the market.
To know more about free market system, visit:
brainly.com/question/30280042
#SPJ1
Directions: Imagine you are a Bantu that traveled to Southern Africa.
Your uncle who stayed in Northern Africa wants to know what it is like.
Write him a letter describing your journey and experiences during your
migration. Explain what your civilization is like now in Southern Africa and
comment if it is better in the south or back in the north where you originally
were from. Your letter must be at least 6 sentences long.
Moving from one location to another with the purpose of living there either permanently or temporarily is known as human migration (geographic region).
What are migration and its causes?People migrate when they relocate from one location to another with the intention of settling down. Causes: Migration was frequently prompted by environmental conditions in preindustrial cultures, such as the demand for resources brought on by overpopulation.
In general, there are two types of variables that affect people's migration decisions. Where a person now resides, push factors exist that reduce the appeal of staying there. Political turmoil, a lack of employment prospects, or congestion might all be push factors.
Learn more about migration here:
https://brainly.com/question/28827966
#SPJ9
FILL IN THE BLANK the assassination of _____ in sarajevo by a serbian nationalist was the spark that ignited the war.
What is the role of governments in the circular flow model?
A. To provide workers with wages.
B. To provide businesses with labor.
C. To collect and distribute money in the economy.
D. To stockpile goods and services.
The role of governments in the circular flow model is to C. To collect and distribute money in the economy.
In the circular flow paradigm, what part does the government play?Government is a buyer (demand) in both the goods and resource markets in a three-sector circular flow diagram. In exchange for tax contributions, the government offers transfer payments, public goods, and public services to individuals and businesses.
In this circular flow model, the government not only spends and distributes money, but it is also a source of "leakage"—that is, the removal of money from the system through taxes. Governments impose taxes on individuals, businesses, and other entities in the form of income tax, sales tax, property tax, and other tax forms.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about governments at:
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Explain: How does the painting, Arnolfini Double Portrait, by Jan van Eyck show details of the Northern Renaissance beliefs in Protestant religious viewpoints?
Answer:
Explanation:
The painting "Arnolfini Double Portrait" by Jan van Eyck is generally considered a secular portrait, and while it was created during a time of significant religious upheaval in the Northern Renaissance, it is not believed to directly depict Protestant religious viewpoints. The painting is not considered to have a clear religious or political message, but rather to be a representation of the sitter, who was a wealthy merchant, and his wife or companion.
The Northern Renaissance was characterized by a greater focus on individualism, realism, and the natural world, which can be seen in the detailed and lifelike rendering of the sitters and the intricate details of their clothing and surroundings. However, this increased realism does not necessarily indicate a specific religious viewpoint.
While the painting was created during a time of religious change in the Northern Renaissance, with the rise of Protestantism, there is no clear evidence that the painting itself was meant to depict Protestant religious beliefs. It is not a painting that directly relates to the Protestant religious viewpoint, but rather a portrait that captures the style, realism, and attention to detail that characterized Northern Renaissance art of the time.
12
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two factors influenced the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867?
10
the prospect of gaining native Alaskans as citized
a political plot to overthrow the Russian government
the belief in Manifest Destiny
a desire to expand American trade in the Pacific
the public's support in favor of the purchase
Reset
Next
Two factors that influenced the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867 are the belief in Manifest Destiny and the desire to expand American trade in the Pacific. The correct options are c and d.
What is manifest destiny?Manifest Destiny was the idea that white Americans were divinely ordained to settle the entire continent of North America. The ideology of Manifest Destiny inspired a variety of measures designed to remove or destroy the native population. US President James K. Polk is the leader most associated with Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny inflamed sectional tensions over slavery, which ultimately led to the Civil War. Due to internal constraints and the problem of slavery, according to historian Frederick Merk, the United States never made manifest destiny a national priority.
Former American President John Quincy Adams, who had once been a strong proponent of the idea behind manifest destiny, had altered his views by 1843 and rejected expansionism since it would have resulted in the spread of slavery in Texas.
Learn more about Manifest, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15205517
#SPJ9
I need help on this question,
In what ways were the environment and nature central to the religion of most California Native tribes? Compare this to what you know about Western Culture, Christianity, or non-Christian culture/religion. Do you see more differences than similarities? Give examples to support your answer.
A question that might help: how did the Natives demonstrate their reverence for and dependence upon the natural world?
The answer is:
Native American religions, religious beliefs and sacramental practices of the indigenous peoples of North and South America. Until the 1950s it was commonly assumed that the religions of the surviving Native Americans were little more than curious anachronisms, dying remnants of humankind’s childhood. These traditions lacked sacred texts and fixed doctrines or moral codes and were embedded in societies without wealth, mostly without writing, and without recognizable systems of politics or justice or any of the usual indicators of civilization. Today the situation has changed dramatically. Scholars of religion, students of the ecological sciences, and individuals committed to expanding and deepening their own religious lives have found in these traditions many distinct and varied religious worlds that have struggled to survive but that retain the ability to inspire.which of the following helps explain why congress chose george washington to command the continental army?
Washington was chosen above other contenders, such as John Hancock, because of his previous military experience and the belief that a Virginian leader might help unite the provinces.
Several factors contributed to Congress' decision to choose George Washington as commander of the Continental Army, but one key element was his military expertise and leadership during the French and Indian War. During the war, Washington served as a colonel in the Virginia militia, gaining significant experience in organizing and directing troops in battle. Furthermore, he was regarded as a unifying figure capable of rallying support from the numerous colonies and commanding the respect of his fellow officers. His reputation for honesty, bravery, and military prowess made him an obvious choice to command the fledgling American military effort.
For such more question on Washington:
https://brainly.com/question/2409724
#SPJ4
The following question may be like this:
What helps explain why congress chose George Washington to command the continental army?
which of the following statements about labor unions is not true?
a. their goal is higher wages and better working conditions for members
b. they help negotiate labor contracts
c. they are illegal in the United States
d. they ate made up of locals, nationals, and federations.
A group of two or more employees who band together to pursue shared goals—such as wages, benefits, scheduling, and some other employment terms and conditions—is referred to as a labor union.
What is the meaning of the Labour Union?An organization of workers dedicated to "maintaining or enhancing the terms of their employment," such as achieving better salaries, is known as a trade union, labor union, or just a union.
Trade unions or labor unions are associations founded by employees in similar professions to further the interests of their constituents. They assist employees with matters such as benefits, acceptable working conditions, hours of work, and pay equity.
Learn more about the Labour Union here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392745
#SPJ1
In 450 BC, Roman leaders introduced a code of written law known as
citizens.
Reset
Next
which outlines the rules and rights of Roman
In 450 BC, Roman leaders introduced a code of written law known as Law of the Twelve Tables which outlines the rules and rights of Roman.
What was the Law of the Twelve Tables during Roman Era?The Twelve Tables were written at the request of the plebeians, who felt their legal rights were being hampered by the fact that court judgments were rendered according to unwritten custom preserved only among a small group of learned patricians.
Beginning in 451, the first set of commissioners created ten tables, which were later supplemented by two more. The code was formally posted in the Roman Forum in 450, most likely on bronze tablets. The written recording of the law in the Twelve Tables allowed the plebeians to become acquainted with the law while also protecting themselves from patricians' abuses of power.
Read more about Twelve Tables
brainly.com/question/20951861
#SPJ1
in freud's theory of psychosexual development, weaning is the central conflict of the stage, whereas toilet training is the central conflict of the stage.
In Freud's theory of psychosexual development, weaning is the central conflict of the oral stage, whereas toilet training is the central conflict of the A.N.A.L stage.
Sigmund Freud's theory of psychosexual development is a key concept in his theory of personality. According to Freud, personality develops in a series of stages, each of which is marked by a central conflict. The first stage in this theory is the oral stage, which lasts from birth to around 18 months. During this stage, the infant's primary focus is on feeding, and the central conflict of the stage is weaning. Freud believed that the infant's satisfaction and frustration during feeding would shape their personality and attitude towards others later in life. If the infant experiences consistent and adequate nourishment, they will develop a sense of trust and security in their environment. If the infant is not properly weaned, however, they may develop an oral fixation, leading to over-dependence on oral activities such as smoking or overeating. The second stage of psychosexual development is the a.n.a.l stage, which lasts from around 18 months to 3 years. During this stage, the central conflict is toilet training, and the child's focus is on the control and elimination of bodily waste. According to Freud, the child's experience during toilet training can shape their personality, and a failure to properly manage this conflict may lead to an a.n.a.l fixation, resulting in traits such as obsessiveness, orderliness, and stubbornness. Overall, Freud's theory of psychosexual development continues to be studied and debated in the field of psychology, and has had a significant impact on the understanding of personality development.
To learn more about Sigmund Freud's theory click here
brainly.com/question/3895370
#SPJ4
Complete Question
Fill in the blank!! In Freud's theory of psychosexual development, weaning is the central conflict of the stage, whereas toilet training is the central conflict of the stage.
What is your opinion on the "clear and present danger" test? ( Book, p. 144). Do you agree or disagree with its limits on free speech?
I agree with the limits imposed by the "clear and present danger" test on free speech. I believe that while freedom of speech is a fundamental b, it should not be unlimited and must be balanced against other important considerations, such as public safety.
Write a note on "clear and present danger" test.
The "clear and present danger" test is a legal standard used in the United States to determine the limits of free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution. The test was first established in the landmark case Schenck v. United States (1919) and has been used in subsequent court cases to balance the right to free speech with the government's interest in protecting public safety.
Under the "clear and present danger" test, speech can be restricted if it creates a "clear and present danger" to public safety or order. This means that speech that poses an imminent threat to the community, such as inciting violence or spreading false information about a contagious disease, can be limited by the government to protect public safety.
Hence, the answer is, I agree with the limits imposed by the "clear and present danger" test on free speech. I believe that while freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it should not be unlimited and must be balanced against other important considerations, such as public safety.
To learn more about, "clear and present danger" follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27399929
#SPJ1
in which direction did the troops who landed at gold beach travel to reach their
destination?
Answer:
southeast
Explanation:
it was to the southeast that they marched
Mountain men served as guides and helped settle Oregon. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
Mountain men served as guides and helped settle Oregon. The statement is True.
What are Mountain men?Trappers who were attracted to the west by the advantages of the fur trade were referred to as "Mountain Men." They guide visitors into Oregon Country on difficult mountain routes. They learned of the several routes west through the Plains.
Two mountain men, Jim Bridger, and Kit Carson supported settlements by establishing new pathways that connected the east and west. The Oregon Trail was the most popular path for trekking.
Therefore, the statement is True.
Learn more about Mountain men, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8667137
#SPJ9
Which of the following is not part of the civil rights?
The right to vote
The right to education
The right to work
The right to believe (or not to believe)
Answer:
Your answer is the right to work
Explanation:
The right to work is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law through its inclusion in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, where the right to work emphasizes economic, social and cultural development.
Harappan cities show a greater attention to ______ than was seen anywhere else in the ancient world
Greater care was taken with sanitation in Harappan cities than anyplace elsewhere in the classical civilizations.
What language did Harappan civilization speak?McIntosh proposes one such opportunity: The primary tongue of the civilisation at first, particularly in the Punjab region, was Para-Munda. In the fifth millennium BC, proto-Dravidian invaders brought the language to the region.
Why did the Harappans not survive?Many academics argue that the massive civilization's disintegration into smaller groups known as late Harappan cultures was brought on by changes in river patterns. The monsoons, or breezes that bring heavy rains, could have moved eastward, causing another calamitous upheaval in the Harappan climate.
To know more about Harappan visit:
brainly.com/question/14615948
#SPJ1
What did Jackson reveal about his presidency when he challenged the Supreme Court to enforce its ruling in the Cherokee cases?
Answer: Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States ...
Explanation:
Draw a conclusion about the role of war in uniting Germany.
The Franco-Prussian War did not convince German states to unite under one
nation-state.
The Franco-Prussian War convinced German and French states to unite under one
nation-state.
The Franco-Prussian War convinced Otto von Bismarck that his cause of uniting
Germany was correct.
The Franco-Prussian War convinced German states to unite under one nation-
state.
The War, which took place from 1870-1871, played a significant role in the unification of Germany. Hence option C is correct .
The war led to the defeat of France, which resulted in the creation of the German Empire in 1871, with Wilhelm I of Prussia as its emperor. However, it is important to note that the war alone did not convince German states to unite under one nation-state.
Rather, it was a culmination of various political and economic factors, including Otto von Bismarck's leadership and strategic diplomacy, that ultimately led to the unification of Germany.
The Franco-Prussian War did serve as a catalyst, though, by demonstrating the military strength of the German states and solidifying Bismarck's cause for unification.
Learn more about Franco-Prussian War here
https://brainly.com/question/1350572
#SPJ1
Political Views of the Moral Majority
Which pair of phrases best completes the table?
A. 1) Gambling; 2) Israel
B. 1) Two-parent families; 2) Sex and violence in the media
C. 1) Social welfare programs; 2) Balanced federal budgets
D. 1) Gay rights; 2) Free love
Why do you think would immigrants want to leave their native land, families and everything they’ve ever known and move to a foreign country?
Answer:
There are a variety of reasons why immigrants may choose to leave their native land and move to a foreign country. Some of the most common reasons include:
Economic opportunities: Many immigrants may move to a foreign country in search of better job opportunities and higher wages. They may come from countries with struggling economies or limited job prospects, and believe that moving to a new country will offer them more financial stability.
Political instability: In some cases, immigrants may leave their home countries due to political instability, violence, or persecution. They may fear for their safety or the safety of their families, and believe that moving to a new country will offer them more security.
Family reunification: Immigrants may also choose to move to a new country in order to be reunited with family members who have already emigrated. This is particularly common in cases where families have been separated for extended periods of time due to immigration policies or other factors.
Education: Some immigrants may move to a new country in order to pursue higher education opportunities. They may believe that studying abroad will provide them with better educational opportunities and career prospects.
Overall, the decision to leave one's native land and move to a foreign country is a complex one that is influenced by a variety of individual, economic, political, and social factors.
How did Institutes, by Cassiodorus, help to keep Roman classical scholarship alive? Put the events in chronological order
Cassiodorus was a Roman statesman and writer who lived in the 6th century CE. After retiring from his post as a high-ranking official, he established a monastery in southern Italy and founded a school for the preservation of classical learning.
One of his most significant works was his collection of writings known as the Institutes, which played a crucial role in keeping Roman classical scholarship alive. The following events occurred in chronological order:
Cassiodorus retired from his position as a high-ranking official in the court of Theoderic the Great in the mid-6th century CE.
Cassiodorus established a monastery and founded a school in southern Italy, where he dedicated himself to preserving the classical learning of the Roman Empire.
Cassiodorus wrote his most significant work, the Institutes, which was a collection of readings from the works of Roman authors and designed to provide a comprehensive education in the classical tradition.
The Institutes became a widely-used textbook in the Middle Ages, both in Italy and throughout Europe.
The widespread use of the Institutes helped to keep the knowledge of Roman classical scholarship alive, as the works of the ancient authors that Cassiodorus included in his collection continued to be studied and translated by scholars for centuries to come.
For such more question on Cassiodorus.
https://brainly.com/question/16875656
#SPJ4
Based on the two passages, Douglass and Dana differ in their views of the effect of the Civil War in that Douglass believes that the war has [...]?
Based on the two passages, Douglass and Dana differ in their views of the effect of the Civil War in that Douglass believes that the war has created a political climate in which black rights expansion seemed more feasible, Dana believed that such expansion faced opposition from those who blamed blacks for the South's defeat.
It also created a short window for white voters to empower blacks, and Dana believes blacks won't be empowered until the memory of the war begins to fade. Dana believes Southerners are beginning to recognize the important role of black workers in the post-war economy.
To know more about civil war click on the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/29766424
#SPJ4