Answer:
okay according to me I think that but she was not responsible because she only cut anna and a few drops of blood fell but job short Anna and and bled to death so I think Tom was the one responsible for Anna's death
It is pouring outside, so a woman enters a home to seek shelter from the rain. While there, she sees some awesome jewelry. She decides she wants to steal all of the jewelry, so she does.
DID SHE COMMIT BURGLARY?
Answer:
yes...you literally said that she stole it from the store. although when she came into the house she had no intention of crime, she eventually changed and the purpose of her being there was to commit crime
pros and cons of being a federalist
pros
creates a sense of local patriotism
provides a better level of stability from a political perspective
It encourages involvement
It lessens the bureaucracy.
cons
It creates confusion.
It encourages governments to “pass the buck.”
It stops national policies from being implemented.
It causes uncertainty.
This one depends on your pov
It creates a wealth gap.
Name a criminal case that involved the FBI being brought in
o did they catch them?
o if not who were the suspects?
o if they did, who was the unsub (unknown subject)?
o describe the unsub (unknown subject)
o how did he kill his victims?
Example:
o The BTK Strangler (BTK stands for bind, torture, kill)
o Caught Feb. 29, 2005
o Dennis Rader
o Dennis Lynn Rader is an American serial killer known as BTK or the BTK Strangler. Between 1974 and 1991, Rader killed ten people in Wichita and Park City, Kansas, and sent taunting letters to police and newspapers describing the details of his crimes.
o His motive was a twisted sexual fantasy. As said in his name, he binds his victims using a rope and then put a bag on his victims head. He would strangle his victims and feel their life leaving their body, which was part of his fantasy
To have a fair trial, juries must be a fair cross-section of the community. This most nearly means:
A. the community votes on jury members
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
C. the jury must reflect must consist of family members from the defendant and plaintiff.
D. the jury must be the same race as the defendant
Answer:
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
Explanation:
Because it needs to be around your community
Example of Lax Conscience?
"Lax conscience" describes an in consistent assortment of moral values.
An example is feigning vertue for viciously self- serving reasons, such as helping little old ladies cross busy street, and stealing their purses in the process.
Because they were ___________, Quakers in Pennsylvania refused to go to war against the French.
Answer:
나는 당신이 답을 찾는 행운을 빕니다
Explanation:
미안해 너를 속였다
what are the pros and cons of Trump and Biden?
Answer:
Biden 2020
Explanation:
Because Biden is cool
Answer:
Biden
Explanation:
Trump says absurd things.
Biden is alittle odd.
Trump has done somthings that are accually beneficial to the us.
Biden wants to make the country whole again.
Do we have to pay to be rescued? What if you get attacked by a bear on a hike, and you have to be rescued! Do you have to pay for the rescue? Why? or Why not? agree or disagree! What if you make a mistake why 'll you are on a boat ride! Should you pay to be rescued? Linda Perez-Alcover. Oet 15
4. When passing another vehicle, it is safe to return to your lane if your"
Explanation:
Before returning to your original lane after passing, you must make sure you are not dangerously close to the vehicle you have just passed. When you can see both of the vehicle's headlights in your rearview mirror, you may have enough room to return to the lane.
Why do you think that resisting arrest is considered a serious crime? What elements of the crime of resisting arrest led you to this decision? Do you think it should be considered a misdemeanor or a felony? Explain.
* For Criminal Justice *
Answer:
Resisting should be a misdemeanor and evading should be a felony
Explanation:
If the person is trying to get out while being cuffed, they do not pose much of a danger to the public. But evading is a much larger category. For instance you could lead the police on a high speed car chase and then crash into someone and kill them. You pose a much greater threat to the public.
Resisting arrest is considered serious crime because it doess not only challenge the power of authority but also create security issues for general citizens.
Resisting Arrest
An arrest of a person signifies the power of State and strengthens the trust on Police Force, while the resistance over the arrest is the natural action of an accused but being successful in resisting creates doubt over police force and the authority.
Therefore, resisting arrest is considered serious crime. This should be considered as felony, because the term felony is related to the crimes which are considered very serious.
Learn more about Arrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/8533149
What Is A Reconstructed Memory ?
Answer:
hello
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall, in which the act of remembering is influenced by various other cognitive processes including perception, imagination, semantic memory and beliefs, amongst others.
Answer:
A memory that has been reconstructed
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall
A current vehicle registration expires at _____ of the first owner listed on the registration form.
Answer:
"midnight of the day of birth of the owner."
Explanation:
I've seen some phrases deviate a bit.
Answer:
C. midnight on the birthday
Explanation:
Which statement best supports zimbardos belief that people are not born good or evil
Answer:
A . “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
TRUE or False - You can charge someone with both assault and battery - Civilly and Criminally. Again True or False???
Answer:
The answer is yes. Some actions involve both criminal and civil matters. For example, assault can be both a civil matter and a criminal matter. ... For example, a person who has intentionally killed another can be charged in criminal court with homicide and can also be sued civilly for wrongful death.
Explanation: (true)
Answer:
i think its true
Explanation i might be wrong
5. Sheila and Jan have T-shirts made that reflect their body about breast cancer.Which 1st amendment right are they exercising ?
a. Religion
b. Press
c. Speech
d. Petition
Answer:
I'm not sure but c probably
Answer: C- Speech
Explanation:
They are exercising the Freedom of Speech. Think about it, they are expressing their feelings about how they feel about breast cancer.
My last brain cells were used on picking whether or not to order chipotle or pizza. Which one?
Answer:
Explanation:pizza is good
what term refers to criminal committed against people based on their race or religion
Answer:
hate crime
Explanation:
I searched it on google I attached a photo
Scott is really angry at his friend Rob for having a higher score at playing Angry Birds on their phones. He has always been the best at that game. He sees Rob walking down the street, and he decides to hit him with his car so he can’t play Angry Birds anymore. At the last minute, he changes his mind, but he can’t stop the car in time, and it hits Rob, who ends up getting injured (based on People v. Claborn, 1964).
CAN SCOTT BE CONVICTED OF BATTERY? BATTERY IS CONTACT WITH ANOTHER IN A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE BODILY HARM.
Answer:
Yes, he can be convicted of battery.
Explanation:
Even if he changed his mind about killing Rob, he committed injury and needs to be put in jail for it.
P.S: That is a stupid reason to want to kill someone lol
In the case of DC vs Heller what was the constitutional issue addressed?
Answer:
i think D.C
Explanation:
4. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT, YOU MUST EXCHANGE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE
INFORMATION AND
WITH THE OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED.
A. proof of insurance only
B. proof of insurance and vehicle registration only
C. proof of insurance, vehicle registration, and current address
Here are four historical documents or decisions related to the rule of law. Use their time periods to number them from 1 to 4.
Magna Carta
Marbury v. Madison
U.S. Constitution
Politics
Which of these statements is true of representative democracy?
A. Citizens have unlimited individual rights.
B. Citizens vote directly on all laws and government actions.
C. Government leaders rule by force.
D. The people elect government leaders.
Answer:
D Is the correct answere
Why should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to become the next Associate Supreme Court Justice? Pleaseeee helpppp!
Answer:
Explanation:
Because she was confirmed by the Senate. All official proceedings were done and once they were done, she was confirmed by a majority vote and therefore, can assume the position.
When a bill has passed Congress, and is ready for Presidential consideration, it is said to be which of the following?
OA. Debated
OB. Enrolled
Ос.
Amended
OD. Proposed
Answer:
B) Enrolled.
Explanation:
Answer:
Enrolled
Explanation:
I took the quiz. Im in k12.
What is a law in question ?
Answer:
In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising from those facts.
Explanation:
brainliest?
Can a person be a neurotic, schizophrenic, and psychopath?
Should there be limits on campaign contributions people and businesses can make to political campaigns. Why or Why not?
Answer:
yes because the people should decide not the super wealthy
The idea that government must treat people fairly when it takes life, liberty, or property is part of your right to A.Due Process
B.Eminent Domain
C.Warrant-less Searches
D.Grand Jury
Answer: B
Explanation:
Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like this and be fine. However, Chris has hemophilia, but he hasn’t told anyone even though he’s had it for years, which means he bleeds more than most people and can die from even minor injuries. He bleeds to death.
CAN MARTY BE CHARGED FOR THE DEATH OF CHRIS?
Answer:
It is mostly the responsibility of Marty. Marty should’ve been more careful when playing poker with Chris. Either way there is concequences for everything bad you do so yes Marty is going to be charged for the death of Chris.
Explanation:
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. He sees someone shredding paper through the window. Which of the following exceptions allow him to enter the home?
A.
probable cause
B.
arrest
C.
exigent circumstances
D.
hot pursuit
E.
USA PATRIOT Act
Answer: c
Explanation: took the test
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. Exigent circumstances following exceptions allow him to enter the home. Thus, the correct option is (C).
In the context of the criminal process, an exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation demanding immediate action to avert imminent risk to life or substantial property damage, or to avoid the probable escape of a suspect or the loss of evidence.
Conditions requiring a warrantless entrance, search, or seizure by police when a warrant would normally be necessary compare knock and announce rule, and no-knock search warrant at the warrant.
Therefore, the correct option is "C".
To know more about the exigent circumstances, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ2