Add parentheses to make 6-9-2+3x6 equal to 17

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]40 - 10g[/tex]

Rewrite 40 as 4 × 10

[tex]4 \times 10 - 10g[/tex]

Factor out 10

[tex]10(4 - g)[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]d = 5\sqrt{13}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance Formula: [tex]d = \sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

Simply plug in the 2 coordinates into the distance formula to find distance d:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(-20-(-35))^2+(15-25)^2}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{(-20+35)^2+(-10)^2}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{(15)^2+100}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{225+100}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{325}[/tex]

[tex]d = 5\sqrt{13}[/tex]

We know that :

The sum of two angles that are complementary = 90°

Smaller angle = x

Larger angle = 2x

We can make the formula as

= 2x + x = 90°

= 3x = 90°

= x = 90 ÷ 3

= x = 30

The smaller angle = x = 30°

The larger angle = 2x = 30 × 2 = 60°

Therefore , the measure of each of the angles are 30° and 60° .

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{120 \textdegree}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve for m∠TSP, we can use basic angle relationships and equations.

Let’s assume m∠PSW is [tex]x[/tex]°

We know that if two angles are supplementary, their angle lengths will add to 180°.

We also know that m∠TSP is twice as large as PSW. Since PSW is represented as x°, TSP will be 2x°.

We can add these two angles together and get 180°. Then you can solve for x (PSW)

So we know that x (PSW) is 60°. However, the question asks for the measure of TSP. We know that TSP is twice as large as PSW, so we can multiply PSW (60) by 2.

[tex]60 \cdot 2 = 120[/tex]

So m∠TSP is 120°.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

The 99% confidence interval is  [tex] 403.33 <  \mu < 462.67 [/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The sample size is  n  =  100

   The sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 433[/tex]

    The standard deviation is [tex]\sigma = 115[/tex]

From the question we are told the confidence level is  99% , hence the level of significance is    

      [tex]\alpha = (100 - 99 ) \%[/tex]

=>   [tex]\alpha = 0.01[/tex]

Generally from the normal distribution table the critical value  of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] is  

   [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } =  2.58[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]E = 2.58 *  \frac{115 }{\sqrt{100} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]E = 29.67 [/tex]

Generally 99% confidence interval is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]\= x -E <  \mu <  \=x  +E[/tex]

=>    [tex]433 -29.67 <  \mu < 433 + 29.67[/tex]    

=>    [tex] 403.33 <  \mu < 462.67 [/tex]  

Answer: 1.9 per year this is the answer

Answer:

0.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Its used to find the area and circumference of a circle

Answer:

It is the 16th letter of the Greek alphabet

Used to represent the mathematical constant.

Pi is the ratio of the circumference/diameter.

Hope this helps you!

Answer:

the answer is d because 0.978 cool number like yaaaa.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

96

Step-by-step explanation:

144/12= 12 ( each hour)

12( times)  8=96

Since they got 144 for 12 hours you have to divide the hours by the money to get the amount earned ever hour so you divide the total amount by the  hour then use the information you got and then you multiply the amount of money by 8

Answer:

do you have the diagram

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes ido

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation: Here, we want to decide

if 2 is a solution for the equation 4n - 3 = -2n + 9.

We can do this by simply plugging in 2 for n.

If the statement holds true, then 2 is a solution.

Plugging in 2 for n, we have 4(2) - 3 = -2(2) + 9.

Remember that a negative times a positive is a negative.

So we have 8 - 3 = -4 + 9.

Simplifying further, we have 5 = 5.

Notice that 5 = 5 is a true statement.

So yes, 2 is a solution for the equation 4n - 3 = -2n + 9.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2

The experiment is messed up. Business and rental drivers are usually much more careful in their driving patterns because the car isn't theirs. They are usually adults, experienced drivers who don't put themselves into risky driving situations. =  Speeding, cutting off others etc.. It also didn't tell how  much the cars were driven. There may have been a down turn in the economy and thus less business driving and same with the rentals. If they were used less after the installation then the study wasn't really valid. What was the price of gas before and after the instillation. Who did the study? Did the  previous testers have any reason to skew the study? Did they own stock in the third light business?  Was it the same people who did the study before who did the study afterwords? What was the average age of the drivers before and after? The study group may have aged and calmed down a bit more? What were the technology changes that occurred about the same time? Anti skid brakes, better material and tread designs for the tires, what about the design of the gages and their lighting.  How about the window styles and size..larger windows mean better view and potentially less accidents. What were the safety aspects of the cars before compared to the cars after, were they the same makes and Models or did the rental and business learn that certain cars were safer than others and move to the safer Models? so many variables to consider but did the tester consider them all-probably not. Random studies study only a certain percentage of the total. Who's to say the second random study didn't get less experienced drivers to study? All good what ifs'.

Answer:

I don’t think it’s neither less than it equal

Step-by-step explanation:

I could be wrong don’t listen to me :)

Answer:

Tom wants to go to disneyland this weekend with 23 adults including himself and 4 children Ashley 3, Leslie 1, Brit 4, Victor 2. Children under the age of 6 pay "x" amount while anyone older pay "y" amount. What equation can tom use to find out how much the tickets in total will be.

Step-by-step explanation:

Y = Adults pay y amount - There are 23 adults

X =kids under 6 pay x amount - there are 4 children

4x+23y

4 (kids under 6 ticket cost)+ 23 (Adults ticket cost)

Answer:

(x+5, y-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Move right 5 units and moves down 2 units

Answer:

(4x - 3)(x-2) = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

             4x² - 11x + 6 = 0

        To factorize this equation,

        -11

     4x6

These numbers are the key to the solution:

   find two numbers whose sum is -11 and the product is + 24 (4 x 6)

   So, the numbers are -3 and -8

    4x² - 8x - 3x + 6 = 0

   4x(x -2) - 3(x - 2) = 0

    (4x - 3)(x-2) = 0

Answer:

(4x - 3)(x - 2) = 0

That's your answer!!

Answer:

2.99

Step-by-step explanation:

1.) 2 goes into 5 2 times. So the 2 goes on top of the division sign

2.) 2x2=4

3.) Move 4 below 5

4.) Subtract 5-4=1

5.) Bring down 9

6.) 2 Goes into 19 9 times

7.) 2x9=18

8.) 19-18=1

9.) Bring down the 7

10.) 2 Goes into 17 8 times

11.) 2x8= 16

12.) 17-16=1

13.) Add a zero onto the end, bring down that zero

14.) 2 goes into 10 5 times.

15.) Round answer to 2.99 because with money you only have two decimals

Answer:

200 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

So we know that the speed is 92 km/h for the first car and 68 km/h for the second car. We do not know the time, but we do know that we need to convert it into minutes. The time for both cars would be x/60. Now we multiply speed by time and get distance. The first car would be 92 x/60 and the second would be 68 x/60, now we cross multiply and make an equation. 92x/60 - 68x/60 = 80, 24x = 80, x=200 minutes.

Answer:

75 feet and 900 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

A yard is equal to 3 feet, while a foot is 12 inches.

Multiply 25 with 3 to get 75 feet.

Multiply 25 with 36 (12*3) to get 900 feet.

Hope this helped :)

hahahaha wht? lol sry im stupid tbh

Answer:

I think it is Positive."

Step-by-step explanation:

I am so sorry if it is not correct.

Good luck!

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Central limit theorem, if from an unknown population large samples of sizes n > 30, are selected and the sample proportion for each sample is computed then the sampling distribution of sample proportion follows a Normal distribution.

The mean of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:

 [tex]\mu_{\hat p}= p[/tex]

The standard deviation of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:

 [tex]\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

(a)

The sample selected is of size n = 450 > 30.

Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.

The mean and standard deviation are:

[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{450}}=0.0204[/tex]

So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0204^{2})[/tex].

(b)

Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:

[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0204}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0204})[/tex]

                                          [tex]=P(-1.96<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.96)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.975-0.025\\=0.95[/tex]

Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.95.

(c)

The sample selected is of size n = 200 > 30.

Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.

The mean and standard deviation are:

[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{200}}=0.0306[/tex]

So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0306^{2})[/tex].

(d)

Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:

[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0306}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0306})[/tex]

                                          [tex]=P(-1.31<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.31)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.9049-0.0951\\=0.8098\\\approx 0.81[/tex]

Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.81.

(e)

The probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 450 is 0.95.

And the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 200 is 0.81.

So, there is a gain in precision on increasing the sample size.