Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You already have this set up to answer your question. This quadratic is in work form, aka vertex form, where the vertex is (3.5, 15). The first coordinate of the vertex is the time it takes to reach its max height, which is the second coordinate of the vertex. So it takes 3.5 seconds to reach a max height of 15 meters.
4ab-3a+3bx-2ab anyone know the answer to this problem?
Answer:
-3a+3bx+2ab
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the measure of of RA.
Answer:
RA = 24
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the triangle is isosceles ( 2 equal sides ) , then LU is a perpendicular bisector , so
AU = RU , that is
4r = 18 - 2r ( add 2r to both sides )
6r = 18 ( divide both sides by 6 )
r = 3
Then
RA = 18 - 2r + 4r = 18 + 2r = 18 + 2(3) = 18 + 6 = 24
2498x2364
explaine how to solve
Answer:
5 905 272
Step-by-step explanation:
you can refer to this lattice multiplication or u can search you tube for the examples of lattice multiplication
Assume that the breaking system of a train consists of two components connected in series with both of them following Weibull distributions. For the first component the shape parameter is 2.1 and the characteristic life is 100,000 breaking events. For the second component the shape parameter is 1.8 and characteristic life of 80,000. Find the reliability of the system after 2,000 breaking events:
Answer:
0.9984
Step-by-step explanation:
we have shape parameter for the first component as 2.1
characteristics life = 100000
for this component
we have
exp(-2000/100000)².¹
= e^-0.0002705
= 0.9997
for the second component
shape parameter = 1.8
characteristic life = 80000
= exp(-2000/80000)¹.⁸
= e^-0.001307
= 0.9987
the reliability oif the system after 2000 events
= 0.9987 * 0.9997
= 0.9984
Give an example of a function with both a removable and a non-removable discontinuity.
Answer:
(x+5)(x-3) / (x+5)(x+1)
Step-by-step explanation:
A removeable discontinuity is always found in the denominator of a rational function and is one that can be reduced away with an identical term in the numerator. It is still, however, a problem because it causes the denominator to equal 0 if filled in with the necessary value of x. In my function above, the terms (x + 5) in the numerator and denominator can cancel each other out, leaving a hole in your graph at -5 since x doesn't exist at -5, but the x + 1 doesn't have anything to cancel out with, so this will present as a vertical asymptote in your graph at x = -1, a nonremoveable discontinuity.
Given: triangle ABC with side lengths a, b, and c, and height h
Prove: Area = 1/2absin C
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Statements Reasons
1). ΔABC with side lengths a, b, c, and h 1). Given
2). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}bh[/tex] 2). Triangle area formula
3). [tex]\text{sin}C=\frac{h}{a}[/tex] 3). Definition of sine
4). asin(C) = h 4). Multiplication property of
equality.
5). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}ba\text{sin}C[/tex] 5). Substitution property
6). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}ab\text{sin}C[/tex] 6). Commutative property of
multiplication.
Hence, proved.
find from first principle the derivative of 3x+5/√x
Answer:
[tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{3x - 5}{2x^\bigg{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
General Formulas and Concepts:
Algebra I
Exponential Rule [Powering]: [tex]\displaystyle (b^m)^n = b^{m \cdot n}[/tex]Exponential Rule [Rewrite]: [tex]\displaystyle b^{-m} = \frac{1}{b^m}[/tex] Exponential Rule [Root Rewrite]: [tex]\displaystyle \sqrt[n]{x} = x^{\frac{1}{n}}[/tex]Calculus
Derivatives
Derivative Notation
Derivative Property [Addition/Subtraction]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}[f(x) + g(x)] = \frac{d}{dx}[f(x)] + \frac{d}{dx}[g(x)][/tex]
Basic Power Rule:
f(x) = cxⁿ f’(x) = c·nxⁿ⁻¹Derivative Rule [Quotient Rule]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} [\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} ]=\frac{g(x)f'(x)-g'(x)f(x)}{g^2(x)}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Define
Identify
[tex]\displaystyle \frac{3x + 5}{\sqrt{x}}[/tex]
Step 2: Differentiate
Rewrite [Exponential Rule - Root Rewrite]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{3x + 5}{x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}}}[/tex]Quotient Rule: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{(x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}})\frac{d}{dx}[3x + 5] - \frac{d}{dx}[x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}}](3x + 5)}{(x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}})^2}[/tex]Simplify [Exponential Rule - Powering]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{(x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}})\frac{d}{dx}[3x + 5] - \frac{d}{dx}[x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}}](3x + 5)}{x}[/tex]Basic Power Rule [Derivative Property - Addition/Subtraction]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{(x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}})(3x^{1 - 1} + 0) - (\frac{1}{2}x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2} - 1})(3x + 5)}{x}[/tex]Simplify: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{3x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}} - (\frac{1}{2}x^\bigg{\frac{-1}{2}})(3x + 5)}{x}[/tex]Rewrite [Exponential Rule - Rewrite]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{3x^\bigg{\frac{1}{2}} - (\frac{1}{2x^{\frac{1}{2}}})(3x + 5)}{x}[/tex]Rewrite [Exponential Rule - Root Rewrite]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{3\sqrt{x} - (\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}})(3x + 5)}{x}[/tex]Simplify [Rationalize]: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} = \frac{3x - 5}{2x^\bigg{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]Topic: AP Calculus AB/BC (Calculus I/I + II)
Unit: Derivatives
Book: College Calculus 10e
what can you infer about angles x and y based on the information in the other triangles?
ANSWER ASAP IM BEING TIMED
IF I GET AN A ON THIS I WILL DO ANOTHER POINT FREE DROP, PLEASE SHOW YOUR WORK
The lengths of three sides of a quadrilateral are shown below:
Side 1: 1y2 + 3y − 6
Side 2: 4y − 7 + 2y2
Side 3: 3y2 − 8 + 5y
The perimeter of the quadrilateral is 8y3 − 2y2 + 4y − 26.
Part A: What is the total length of sides 1, 2, and 3 of the quadrilateral? (4 points)
Part B: What is the length of the fourth side of the quadrilateral? (4 points)
Part C: Do the answers for Part A and Part B show that the polynomials are closed under addition and subtraction? Justify your answer. (2 points)
Answer:
Part A
(1y^2+3y-6)+(4y-7+2y^2)+(3y^2-8+5y)
6y^2+12y-21
Two statements are logically equivalent when:
A. The two statements are true in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are always true.
B. The first statement implies the second, i.e. if the first statement is true, so is the second.
C. The two statements agree in point of truth or falsehood in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are true or false in exactly the same conditions.
D. The two statements are false in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are always false.
C. The two statements agree in point of truth or falsehood in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are true or false in exactly the same conditions.
Step-by-step explanation:For two statements to be logically equivalent, their truth values (true or false) must be the same for every variation of their constituent variables. In other words, if the truth tables of both statements are the same for every possible value of their variables, then they are logically equivalent.
For example;
The two statements P ∩ (Q U R) and (P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) are logically equivalent.
If P, Q and R are all true, then;
P ∩ (Q U R) = true
(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = true
If P, Q and R are all true, then;
P ∩ (Q U R) = false
(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false
If P = false, Q = true and R = true, then;
P ∩ (Q U R) = false
(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false
Checking for all other possible combinations of truth values of P, Q and R will always give the same results for the two statements, therefore, they are logically equivalent.
An amusement park offers 2 options on tickets into the park. People can either buy 5 admission tickets for $130 or buy 1 admission ticket for $30. How much money will a group of 5 people save by buying 5 admission tickets for $130?
Answer:
You could save $20
Step-by-step explanation:
For buying them separately for $30 each for 5 people it would be $150 but if you buy the first option you would get 5 admission tickets for only $130
Answer:
20 dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
for the first deal is 5 for $130
and the second is for $30
$30 times 5 (the number of people) = $150
$150-$130= is 20
answer: $20
g(x)=(cosθsinθ)^4 what's the differential
Answer:
sin²2θ. (cos θ sin θ). cos 2θ
Step-by-step explanation:
finding g'(x)
g'(x)
(x^n)' = nx^(n -1)= 4 (cosθsinθ)³ . { cosθ. (sinθ)' + sinθ. (cosθ)' }
(cosθ)' = - sinθ (sinθ)' = cosθ= 4 (cosθsinθ)³ { cosθ. cos θ + sinθ.(-sin θ)}
= 4 (cosθsinθ)³{ cos²θ - sin²θ}
cos²θ - sin²θ = cos 2θ2sinθ cosθ = sin 2θ= (4 cosθ sinθ)². (cosθ sinθ). { cos²θ - sin²θ}
= sin²2θ. (cos θ sin θ). cos 2θ
What is the most specific name for a quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides?
A. trapezoid
B. rectangle
C. parallelogram
D. quadrilateral
help me pls
Answer:
C: parallelogram
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide 30 in the ratio 1 : 4
Answer:
6 : 24
Step-by-step explanation:
If we are in the ratio of 1 to 4, the total is 1+4 = 5
Divide 30 by 5
30/5 = 6
Multiply each term in the ratio by 6
1 :4
1*6 : 4*6
6 : 24
Answer:
total ratio:
[tex] = 1 + 4 \\ = 5[/tex]
For the portion of 1:
[tex] = 30 \div \frac{1}{5} \\ = 30 \times 5 \\ = 150[/tex]
For the portion of 4:
[tex] = 30 \div \frac{4}{5} \\ = 30 \times \frac{5}{4} \\ = 37.5[/tex]
= 30 : 7.5
Which is equivalent to (-m)4x n2 ?
Answer:
a.) m⁴n²
Step-by-step explanation:
( -m)⁴ × n ²
A negative base raised to an even powers equals a positive.
m ⁴ × n²
multiply the terms
m⁴n²
Answer:
a.) m⁴n²
Step-by-step explanation:
yea
4
5
start fraction, 5, divided by, 4, end fraction hour ==equals
minutes
Answer:
1.25. It would be 1.25 if ur just talking about dividing in general which is pretty tough
Answer:
\dfrac54=-4c+\dfrac14 4 5 =−4c+ 4 1 start fraction, 5, divided by, 4, end fraction, equals, minus, 4, c, plus, start fraction, 1, divided by, 4, end fraction
Step-by-step explanation:
At a sale this week, a sofa is being sold for $117.60. This is a 72% discount from the original price. What is the original price?
Can you please help me with this question
Calculate the pH of a buffer solution made by mixing 300 mL of 0.2 M acetic acid, CH3COOH, and 200 mL of 0.3 M of its salt sodium acetate, CH3COONa, to make 500 mL of solution. Ka for CH3COOH = 1.76×10–5
Answer:
Approximately [tex]4.75[/tex].
Step-by-step explanation:
Remark: this approach make use of the fact that in the original solution, the concentration of [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex] and [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex] are equal.
[tex]{\rm CH_3COOH} \rightleftharpoons {\rm CH_3COO^{-}} + {\rm H^{+}}[/tex]
Since [tex]\rm CH_3COONa[/tex] is a salt soluble in water. Once in water, it would readily ionize to give [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex] and [tex]\rm Na^{+}[/tex] ions.
Assume that the [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex] and [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex] ions in this solution did not disintegrate at all. The solution would contain:
[tex]0.3\; \rm L \times 0.2\; \rm mol \cdot L^{-1} = 0.06\; \rm mol[/tex] of [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex], and
[tex]0.06\; \rm mol[/tex] of [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex] from [tex]0.2\; \rm L \times 0.3\; \rm mol \cdot L^{-1} = 0.06\; \rm mol[/tex] of [tex]\rm CH_3COONa[/tex].
Accordingly, the concentration of [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex] and [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex] would be:
[tex]\begin{aligned} & c({\rm CH_3COOH}) \\ &= \frac{n({\rm CH_3COOH})}{V} \\ &= \frac{0.06\; \rm mol}{0.5\; \rm L} = 0.12\; \rm mol \cdot L^{-1} \end{aligned}[/tex].
[tex]\begin{aligned} & c({\rm CH_3COO^{-}}) \\ &= \frac{n({\rm CH_3COO^{-}})}{V} \\ &= \frac{0.06\; \rm mol}{0.5\; \rm L} = 0.12\; \rm mol \cdot L^{-1} \end{aligned}[/tex].
In other words, in this buffer solution, the initial concentration of the weak acid [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex] is the same as that of its conjugate base, [tex]\rm CH_3COO^{-}[/tex].
Hence, once in equilibrium, the [tex]\rm pH[/tex] of this buffer solution would be the same as the [tex]{\rm pK}_{a}[/tex] of [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex].
Calculate the [tex]{\rm pK}_{a}[/tex] of [tex]\rm CH_3COOH[/tex] from its [tex]{\rm K}_{a}[/tex]:
[tex]\begin{aligned} & {\rm pH}(\text{solution}) \\ &= {\rm pK}_{a} \\ &= -\log_{10}({\rm K}_{a}) \\ &= -\log_{10} (1.76 \times 10^{-5}) \\ &\approx 4.75\end{aligned}[/tex].
A manufacturer of nails claims that only 4% of its nails are defective. A random sample of 20 nails is selected, and it is found that two of them, 10%, are defective. Is it fair to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation?
Answer:
The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.
Step-by-step explanation:
A manufacturer of nails claims that only 4% of its nails are defective.
At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 4%, that is:
[tex]H_0: p = 0.04[/tex]
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is more than 4%, that is:
[tex]H_a: p > 0.04[/tex]
The test statistic is:
[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
4% is tested at the null hypothesis
This means that [tex]\mu = 0.04, \sigma = \sqrt{0.04*0.96}[/tex]
A random sample of 20 nails is selected, and it is found that two of them, 10%, are defective.
This means that [tex]n = 20, X = 0.1[/tex]
Value of the test statistic:
[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \frac{0.1 - 0.04}{\frac{\sqrt{0.04*0.96}}{\sqrt{20}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = 1.37[/tex]
P-value of the test and decision:
Considering an standard significance level of 0.05.
The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.1, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 1.37.
Looking at the z-table, z = 1.37 has a p-value of 0.9147
1 - 0.9147 = 0.0853
The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.
Answer:
Considering an standard significance level of 0.05.
The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.1, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 1.37.
Looking at the z-table, z = 1.37 has a p-value of 0.9147
1 - 0.9147 = 0.0853
The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.
Step-by-step explanation:
An airplane flies 105 miles in ½ hour. How far can it fly in 1 ¼ hours at the same rate of speed?
Answer:
262.5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Correct me if I am wrong
An airplane can travel 350 mph in still air. If it travels 1995 miles with the wind
in the same length of time it travels 1505 miles against the wind, what is the speed of the wind?
Answer:
49 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
RT=D
T = D/R
[tex]\frac{1995}{(350 + x) } =\frac{1505}{350-x}[/tex]
1995(350-x) = 1505(350+x)
x=49
Given n(A) = 1300, n(A U B) = 2290, and n(A n B) = 360, find n(B).
Answer:
n(B) = 1350
Step-by-step explanation:
Using Venn sets, we have that:
[tex]n(A \cup B) = n(A) + n(B) - n(A \cap B)[/tex]
Three values are given in the exercise.
The other is n(B), which we have to find. So
[tex]n(A \cup B) = n(A) + n(B) - n(A \cap B)[/tex]
[tex]2290 = 1300 + n(B) - 360[/tex]
[tex]940 + n(B) = 2290[/tex]
[tex]n(B) = 2290 - 940 = 1350[/tex]
So
n(B) = 1350
Detroit's population in 2012 was 699,710 people. Detroit's population in 2016 was 678,045 people.
What is the absolute change from 2012 to 2016?
Round your answer to the nearest person.
Answer:
The absolute change was of -21,665 people.
Step-by-step explanation:
Absolute change:
Final value subtracted by the initial value.
In this question:
Initial value: 699,710
Final value: 678,045
What is the absolute change from 2012 to 2016?
678045 - 699710 = -21,665
The absolute change was of -21,665 people.
An item is regularly priced at $84. Ashley bought it on sale for 70% off the regular price.
Use the ALEKS calculator to find how much Ashley paid
Answer:
58.80
Step-by-step explanation:
84 x .7(70%) =58.80
Mathematics puzzle from my calculus text book.
Answer:
[tex]{ \tt{g(x) = a {x}^{2} + bx + c = 0 }} \\ { \tt{f(x) = {a'x}^{2} + b 'x + c' = 0}} \\ { \boxed{ \bf{f(g(x)) = g(f(x))}}} : \\ { \tt{ =( \frac{a}{a'})x {}^{2} + ( \frac{b}{b'}) x} + \frac{c}{c'} } = 0[/tex]
Identify the transformation that occurs to create the graph of m(x)
m(x)=f(5x)
Answer:
m(x) is a dilation of scale factor K = 1/5 of f(x).
Step-by-step explanation:
The transformation is a horizontal dilation
The general transformation is defined as:
For a given function f(x), a dilation of scale factor K is written as:
g(x) = f(x/K)
If K > 1, then we have a dilation (the graph contracts)
if 0 < K < 1, then we have a contraction (the graph stretches)
Here we have m(x) = f(5*x)
Then we have a scale factor:
K = 1/5
So this is a contraction.
Then the transformation is:
m(x) is a dilation of scale factor K = 1/5 of f(x).
Which of the following are best described as lines that meet to form a right
angle?
Answer:
Two lines that intersect and form right angles are called perpendicular lines.
Answer:
perpendicular lines
Step-by-step explanation:
Definition of perpendicular lines:
Two lines that intersect forming a right angle are perpendicular lines.
Answer: perpendicular lines
Translate the sentence into an inequality.
The sum of 5 and c is greater than – 22.
what da hell the answer ?
Answer:
5 + c > -22
General Formulas and Concepts:
Pre-Algebra
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
Brackets Parenthesis Exponents Multiplication Division Addition Subtraction Left to RightAlgebra I
InequalitiesStep-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Define
Sum of 5 and c is greater than -22
↓ Identify
Sum = addition
5 + cIs greater than = inequality
>Add them all together:
5 + c > -22
The mean number of words per minute (WPM) typed by a speed typist is 149 with a standard deviation of 14 WPM. What is the probability that the sample mean would be greater than 147.8 WPM if 88 speed typists are randomly selected
Answer:
78.81%
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Population mean; μ = 149
Sample mean; x¯ = 147.8
Sample size; n = 88
standard deviation; σ = 14
Z-score is;
z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)
Plugging in the relevant values;
z = (147.8 - 149)/(14/√88)
z = -0.804
From z-distribution table attached, we have; p = 0.21186
P(X > 147.8) = 1 - 0.21186 = 0.78814
In percentage gives; p = 78.81%