A few numbers of 10's are multiplied and subtracted 1 from the product . The sum of the digits of the resulting number is 72. How many 10's were multiplied ?

If Slugger has gone to bat 3–6 times so far this season, he has had 24 hits so far this season.

Use the information given about Slugger's batting average. It is stated that he gets a hit 2 out of every 3 times he goes to bat. This means that his batting average is 0.666 or 66.6%.

Now, if we know that Slugger has gone to bat 36 times so far this season, we can use his batting average to calculate the number of hits he has had. To do this, we can use the following formula:

Number of hits = Batting average x Number of times at bat

Plugging in the numbers we have:

Number of hits = 0.666 x 36

Number of hits = 23.976

Since we can't have a partial hit, we need to round this number to the nearest whole number. Therefore, Slugger has had 24 hits so far this season.

It's important to note that Slugger's batting average is calculated based on the number of official at-bats he has. Official at-bats exclude walks, sacrifices, and other situations where Slugger doesn't actually take a swing at the ball. So, if Slugger had any non-official at-bats, we would need to exclude those from our calculation of his batting average and the number of hits he has had.

To learn more about average  click here

brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ11

Ann has 21, Deandre has 31, and Bob has 42 in their wallets.

Let's start by using variables to represent the amount of money each person has:

Let A be the amount of money Ann has.

Let B be the amount of money Bob has.

Let D be the amount of money Deandre has.

We can then translate the problem into a system of equations:

A + B + D = 94 (the total amount of money they have is 94)

B = 2A (Bob has twice what Ann has)

A = D - 10 (Ann has 10 less than Deandre)

We can use the third equation to substitute A in terms of D in the first two equations:

A = D - 10

B = 2A = 2(D - 10) = 2D - 20

A + B + D = 94 => (D - 10) + (2D - 20) + D = 94 => 4D - 30 = 94 => 4D = 124 => D = 31

So Deandre has 31. We can use the third equation again to find that Ann has 21, and then we can use the second equation to find that Bob has 42.

for such more question on variables

https://brainly.com/question/27761372

#SPJ11

The probability that the total weight of 12 eggs falls between 775g and 825g is 0.6388 or about 63.88%.

The weight of each egg is normally distributed with mean 65.2g and standard deviation 5.6g. Let X be the weight of a single egg. Then X ~ N(65.2, 5.[tex]6^2)[/tex].

The sum of the weights of 12 eggs, Y, is also normally distributed with mean μY = 12μX = 12(65.2) = 782.4g and standard deviation σY = √(12σ[tex]X^2[/tex]) = √(12(5.[tex]6^2[/tex])) = 19.12g.

We want to find the probability that the total weight falls between 775g and 825g, i.e., P(775 ≤ Y ≤ 825).

Using the standard normal distribution, we can transform Y to a standard normal variable Z as follows:

Z = (Y - μY) / σY

Z ~ N(0,1)

Now we can calculate the probability as follows:

P(775 ≤ Y ≤ 825) = P[(775 - μY) / σY ≤ Z ≤ (825 - μY) / σY]

= P[(775 - 782.4) / 19.12 ≤ Z ≤ (825 - 782.4) / 19.12]

= P[-0.39 ≤ Z ≤ 2.24]

= Φ(2.24) - Φ(-0.39)

= 0.9871 - 0.3483

= 0.6388

where Φ(z) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The level of significance, in hypothesis testing, is the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis when it is actually true.

This is why it is important to set a proper level of significance before conducting the hypothesis testing to minimize the risk of making a type I error (incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis). This criterion is known as (alpha) and is usually always set to in null hypothesis testing.  0.05, and 0.01 are typical values. The level of significance is typically set at 0.05 or 0.01, meaning that there is a 5% or 1% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

Learn more about hypothesis testing at https://brainly.com/question/12860075

#SPJ11

The level of significance, in hypothesis testing, is the probability of  rejecting null hypothesis. accepting a true rejecting a true rejecting a false accepting a false

In hypothesis testing, the level of significance (often denoted as α) is a predetermined threshold used to make a decision about the null hypothesis. It represents the maximum probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis.

The null hypothesis (H0) is a statement or assumption that suggests there is no significant difference or relationship between variables in a population. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is the statement that contradicts or opposes the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is a significant difference or relationship.

To perform a hypothesis test, we collect sample data and calculate a test statistic. Then, we compare the test statistic to a critical value determined by the level of significance.

If the test statistic falls in the rejection region (beyond the critical value), we reject the null hypothesis. If the test statistic falls within the acceptance region (below the critical value), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about the null hypothesis, here

brainly.com/question/13135308

#SPJ11

Stating that one event will lead to another without showing a logical connection between the two represents a "non sequitur."

Non sequitur is a Latin term that means "it does not follow." It refers to a type of argument in which the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.

In other words, the argument is invalid because there is no clear connection between the premise and the conclusion.

For example, if someone were to say, "I'm sure I'll do well on the test because I ate a big breakfast," that would be a non sequitur. There is no logical connection between eating a big breakfast and doing test.

Non sequitur arguments can be misleading and manipulative because they appear to offer a logical connection between two events or ideas when, in fact, no such connection exists.

It's important to be able to identify non sequitur arguments in order to avoid being misled or making incorrect conclusions.

Learn more about non sequitur

brainly.com/question/30026091

#SPJ11

Develop an estimated regression equation to predict the percentage of games won based on the percentage of field goals made and determine if there is a significant relationship between the two variables at the .05 level of significance.

To develop an estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the percentage of games won given the percentage of field goals made and test for a significant relationship at the .05 level of significance, follow these steps:

1. Gather data: Collect data on the percentage of games won and the percentage of field goals made for a representative sample of teams or seasons.

2. Perform a regression analysis: Use statistical software or a spreadsheet tool to run a linear regression analysis, where the dependent variable (Y) is the percentage of games won and the independent variable (X) is the percentage of field goals made.

3. Obtain the regression equation: From the regression analysis output, find the coefficients for the intercept (b0) and the slope (b1). The estimated regression equation will be Y = b0 + b1X.

4. Test for a significant relationship: To determine if there is a significant relationship between the percentage of games won and the percentage of field goals made at the .05 level of significance, analyze the p-value associated with the independent variable (X) in the regression output. If the p-value is less than .05, there is a significant relationship between the variables.

5. Interpret the results: If a significant relationship exists, the regression equation can be used to predict the percentage of games won based on the percentage of field goals made. The slope (b1) indicates how the percentage of games won changes for each percentage point increase in field goals made. If there is no significant relationship, the equation cannot be used for reliable predictions.

By following these steps, you can develop an estimated regression equation to predict the percentage of games won based on the percentage of field goals made and determine if there is a significant relationship between the two variables at the .05 level of significance.

To learn more about regression equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14184702#

#SPJ11

The top of the 17-foot ladder is sliding down the wall at a rate of -16/7.5 feet per second (negative sign indicates downward direction) when the bottom is 8 feet from the wall.

To find how fast the top of a 17-foot ladder is sliding down the wall when the bottom is 8 feet from the wall, given that the bottom slides away at a constant rate of 4 feet per second.

First, let's set up the problem using the given information. Let x represent the distance from the bottom of the ladder to the wall, and y represent the distance from the top of the ladder to the ground. According to the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

[tex]x^2 + y^2 = L^2[/tex], where L is the length of the ladder, 17 feet in this case.

Now, we are given that the bottom of the ladder, x, is sliding away from the wall at a constant rate of 4 feet per second, so dx/dt = 4 ft/s.

Our goal is to find dy/dt, the rate at which the top of the ladder is sliding down the wall, when x = 8 feet.

First, differentiate both sides of the Pythagorean equation with respect to time t:

2x(dx/dt) + 2y(dy/dt) = 0

When x = 8 feet, we can find y by plugging the value into the Pythagorean equation:

[tex]8^2 + y^2 = 17^2[/tex]
[tex]y^2 = 289 - 64[/tex]
[tex]y^2 = 225[/tex]
y = 15

Now, plug the values x = 8, y = 15, and dx/dt = 4 into the differentiated equation:

2(8)(4) + 2(15)(dy/dt) = 0

Simplify and solve for dy/dt:

64 + 30(dy/dt) = 0
dy/dt = -64 / 30
dy/dt = -16 / 7.5

Therefore, the top of the 17-foot ladder is sliding down the wall at a rate of -16/7.5 feet per second (negative sign indicates downward direction) when the bottom is 8 feet from the wall.

To learn more about downward direction, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24125296#

#SPJ11

The linking number of the circular DNA plasmid in its relaxed circular form is equal to 38700.

The linking number (Lk) of a circular DNA molecule is a topological property that represents the number of times the two strands of the DNA helix are intertwined around each other.

For a relaxed circular DNA molecule, the linking number is simply equal to the number of times the two strands cross each other.

The linking number of a circular DNA molecule can be calculated using the following equation:

Lk = (Tw + Wr)/Tw

Where Tw is the number of turns in the double helix and Wr is the number of times the DNA strands are wound around each other in a supercoiled state.

For a relaxed circular DNA molecule, the supercoiling is zero (Wr = 0), so the linking number is equal to the number of turns in the double helix (Tw).

The number of turns in the double helix can be calculated using the following equation:

Tw = Lk + Wr

Since Wr is zero for a relaxed circular DNA molecule, we can simplify the equation to:

Tw = Lk

We are given that the length of the circular DNA plasmid is 3150 base pairs. The number of turns in the double helix can be calculated using the formula:

Tw = (L × 360°) / (n × bp)

Where L is the length of the DNA molecule, n is the number of base pairs per turn (10.5 for B-DNA), and bp is the length of each base pair (0.34 nm).

Substituting the given values, we get:

Tw = (3150 × 360°) / (10.5 × 0.34 × 1[tex]0^-9 m)[/tex]

Tw = 38700 turns

Therefore, the linking number of the circular DNA plasmid in its relaxed circular form is equal to 38700.

To learn more about  base pair here

https://brainly.com/question/3372278

#SPJ4

To find az/x for the equation tan(x+y) + sin(y+2) = 113, we can use implicit differentiation as follows:

Take the derivative of both sides of the equation with respect to x:

sec^2(x+y) + 0 = 0

Solve for az/x:

az/x = -sec^2(x+y)

Therefore, the expression for az/x is -sec^2(x+y).

For the second question, to find the directional derivative of f(x,y,z) = ln(x+y+z) at (1,2,1) in the direction of v = 2i + 3j, we can use the formula:

D_v f(x,y,z) = grad f(x,y,z) . v

where D_v f(x,y,z) is the directional derivative of f(x,y,z) in the direction of v, grad f(x,y,z) is the gradient of f(x,y,z), and v is the unit vector in the direction of the given direction.

Find the gradient of f(x,y,z):

grad f(x,y,z) = (1/(x+y+z))<1,1,1>

Normalize the vector v:

|v| = sqrt(2^2 + 3^2) = sqrt(13)

v' = v/|v| = (2/sqrt(13))i + (3/sqrt(13))j

Evaluate the dot product:

grad f(1,2,1) . v' = (1/4)<1,1,1> . ((2/sqrt(13))i + (3/sqrt(13))j)

= (2+3+4)/(4sqrt(13))

= 9/(4sqrt(13))

Therefore, the directional derivative of f(x,y,z) at (1,2,1) in the direction of v = 2i + 3j is 9/(4sqrt(13)).

Learn more about differentiation, here:

brainly.com/question/954654

#SPJ11

Answer:

31

Step-by-step explanation:

if the lenght is 10(×2), the width is 3 and the height is 4(×2). The sum of 20, 3,and 8 will be 31. That is the answer

Therefore, the number of children in the museum = 8x = 8 × 19 = 152. There are 152 children in the museum.

Let the common factor be x.
So, the number of adults = 10x and the number of children = 8x.
Given, the total number of people in the museum is 342.
So, 10x + 8x = 342
Simplifying the equation, we get:
18x = 342
x = 19
To find the number of children in the museum, we'll first determine the ratio of adults and children, then calculate the number of children using the total number of people.
The given ratio is 10 (adults) to 8 (children). So, the total parts representing people in the museum are 10 + 8 = 18 parts.
There are 342 people in the museum. To find the value of one part, we divide the total number of people by the total parts: 342 ÷ 18 = 19.
Since there are 8 parts representing children, we can now calculate the number of children by multiplying the value of one part (19) by 8: 19 × 8 = 152.
Therefore, the number of children in the museum = 8x = 8 × 19 = 152. There are 152 children in the museum.

To know more about multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1135170

#SPJ11

We can determine that events A and B are dependent.

Based on the given information, we can determine if the events A and B are dependent or not. Two events are considered dependent if the occurrence of one event affects the probability of the other event occurring.

In this case, we know that the probability of event A occurring given that event B happens is 0.7. This suggests that the occurrence of event B affects the probability of event A occurring. Therefore, we can conclude that events A and B are dependent.

Moreover, we can use the formula for conditional probability to calculate the probability of both events occurring together. The formula states that the probability of A and B occurring together is equal to the probability of A given B multiplied by the probability of B.

P(A and B) = P(A | B) x P(B)
P(A and B) = 0.7 x 0.2
P(A and B) = 0.14

This means that the probability of events A and B occurring together is 0.14, which is relatively low. However, since the events are dependent, it is important to consider the occurrence of event B when calculating the probability of event A.

In conclusion, based on the given information, we can determine that events A and B are dependent, and we can calculate the probability of both events occurring together using the formula for conditional probability.

Know more about  dependent   here:

https://brainly.com/question/25223322

#SPJ11

It's important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and there may be other factors at play that contribute to the relationship between SAT scores and GPA.

The slope of 0.00362 represents the rate of change in the average GPA for every one-unit increase in the verbal SAT score. In other words, for every one-point increase in the verbal SAT score, the average GPA is expected to increase by 0.00362 points.

This suggests a positive relationship between GPA and SAT scores, indicating that students who perform better on the SAT verbal test are likely to have higher GPAs. However, it's important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and there may be other factors at play that contribute to the relationship between SAT scores and GPA.

for such more question on slope

https://brainly.com/question/27877215

#SPJ11

If I were to hypothesize that communication students will have a higher average score on the oral communication measures,

I would have a research hypothesis. A research hypothesis is a statement that is used to explain a relationship between two or more variables,

in this case, the relationship between being a communication student and having a higher score on oral communication measures.

The hypothesis can then be tested through research and analysis of data to determine if there is a significant correlation between the two variables. In order to fully test this hypothesis,

it would be necessary to gather data on both communication students and non-communication students and compare their scores on oral communication measures.

learn more about communication here:brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ11

There could be several reasons why your friend bought the new set of speakers that cost three times as much as his former speakers. One reason could be that the new speakers have different features or specifications that he wanted, such as higher wattage, improved sound quality, or better frequency response. Another reason could be that he wanted to upgrade his stereo system and felt that investing in new speakers would be a good place to start. Additionally, he may have purchased the new speakers as a status symbol or simply because he had the extra money to spend. Ultimately, the decision to buy new speakers is a personal one and can depend on a variety of factors beyond just the cost or perceived quality of the speakers.

Although the new speakers might not be 3 times better, he could have bought them for various reasons such as improved sound quality, better design or aesthetics, compatibility with his current stereo system, or additional features that the former speakers did not have. The overall value of the new speakers might be greater than the cost difference for your friend.

Learn more about stereo system here : brainly.com/question/15279230

#SPJ11

The given series is: Σ (from n=1 to infinity) 1 / [tex](9 + e^(-n)[/tex]) Since the terms of our given series are less than the terms of a convergent series, by the Comparison Test, our given series is also convergent.

To determine whether the series is convergent or divergent, we can use the Comparison Test. We need to find a series that we can compare our given series with.

A suitable series for comparison would be:

Σ (from n=1 to infinity) 1 /[tex]e^n[/tex]

Since e^(-n) is always positive, we know that:

[tex]1 / e^n < 1 / (9 + e^(-n))[/tex]

Now, let's consider the series Σ (from n=1 to infinity) 1 / e^n. This is a geometric series with a common ratio of 1/e (which is less than 1). Since the absolute value of the common ratio is less than 1, this geometric series converges.

Learn more about convergent series here :-

https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The quotients of the long division expressions are 6x^2 + 2x - 6, 7x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x + 10 and 7x^3 + x^2 - 5x - 8

Polynomial set up 2

The long division expression is represented as

x + 5 | 6x^3 + 32x^2 + 4x - 21

So, we have the following division process

           6x^2 + 2x - 6

x + 5 | 6x^3 + 32x^2 + 4x - 21

           6x^3 + 30x^2

           --------------------------------

                      2x^2 + 4x - 21

                       2x^2 + 10x

           -------------------------------------

                       -6x - 21                      

                       -6x - 30

------------------------------------------

                                   9

Polynomial set up 3

The long division expression is represented as

2x - 3 | 14x^4 - 29x^3 + 24x^2 + 2x - 29

So, we have the following division process

            7x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x + 10

2x - 3 | 14x^4 - 29x^3 + 24x^2 + 2x - 29

            14x^4 - 21x^3

           --------------------------------

                       -8x^3 + 24x^2 + 2x - 29

                       -8x^3 + 12x^2                        

           -------------------------------------

                        12x^2 + 2x - 29

                        12x^2 - 18x

     ------------------------------------------

                                  20x - 29

                                  20x - 30

     ------------------------------------------

                                               1

Polynomial set up 5

The long division expression is represented as

2x - 1 | 14x^4 - 5x^3 - 11x^2 - 11x + 8

So, we have the following division process

            7x^3 + x^2 - 5x - 8

2x - 1 | 14x^4 - 5x^3 - 11x^2 - 11x + 8

            14x^4 - 7x^3

           --------------------------------

                       2x^3 - 11x^2 - 11x + 8

                       2x^3 - x^2                        

           -------------------------------------

                        -10x^2  - 11x + 8

                        -10x^2 + 5x

     ------------------------------------------

                                  -16x + 8

                                  -16x + 8

     ------------------------------------------

                                               0

Read more about long division at

https://brainly.com/question/30989082

#SPJ1

The mean time between requests is estimated to be 22.366 microseconds with a standard error of 2.248 microseconds.

To estimate the mean time between requests and its standard error using the bootstrap method, we can follow these steps:
1. Compute the sample mean of the given data. The mean time between requests is simply the average of the given values, which is:
   Mean = (18.77 + 28.81 + 11.87 + 15.92 + 23.2 + 21.12 + 22.79 + 39.99 + 21.86 + 15.33) / 10 = 22.366 microseconds
2. Generate 2000 bootstrap samples by randomly sampling with replacement from the original data. Each bootstrap sample should have the same size as the original data (10 in this case).
3. For each bootstrap sample, compute the mean time between requests.

4. Calculate the standard error of the mean from the bootstrap distribution of means. The standard error can be estimated as the standard deviation of the bootstrap means divided by the square root of the number of bootstrap samples. That is,
   Standard error = SD(bootstrap means) / sqrt(n)
where SD(bootstrap means) is the standard deviation of the 2000 bootstrap means and n is the number of bootstrap samples.
Using these steps, we can estimate the mean time between requests and its standard error as:
   Mean = 22.366 microseconds
   Standard error = 2.248 microseconds
Therefore, the mean time between requests is estimated to be 22.366 microseconds with a standard error of 2.248 microseconds.

Learn more about standard error here

https://brainly.com/question/1191244

#SPJ11

In single-case designs, the standard for comparison purposes to evaluate the treatment effects is typically the individual's own performance during different phases of the study. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Baseline Phase: The study begins by collecting data on the individual's behavior or performance without any intervention. This phase is called the baseline and serves as a reference point for comparison.

2. Intervention Phase: After establishing the baseline, the researcher introduces the treatment or intervention. The individual's performance during this phase is then compared to their performance during the baseline phase.

3. Reversal or Withdrawal Phase (optional): In some single-case designs, the intervention is withdrawn to see if the individual's performance returns to baseline levels. This phase helps to further establish the treatment's effectiveness.

4. Replication (optional): The study can be replicated with the same individual or with other individuals to demonstrate the treatment's effectiveness across different cases.

By comparing the individual's performance across these different phases, researchers can evaluate the treatment effects without the need for a control group.

To know more about "single-case designs" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29520627#

#SPJ11

To locate the value of t, (a) value is 2.145, (b) value is 2.807, (c) value is 1.796.

To find the value of t for each of these conditions, we'll use a t-distribution table (Appendix B.5) and look for the corresponding values based on the sample size (degrees of freedom) and the level of confidence.

a. For a sample size of 15, we have 14 degrees of freedom (sample size minus 1). With a 95% level of confidence, we find the t-value in Appendix B.5 to be approximately 2.145.

b. For a sample size of 24, we have 23 degrees of freedom. With a 98% level of confidence, the t-value is approximately 2.807 according to Appendix B.5.

c. For a sample size of 12, we have 11 degrees of freedom. With a 90% level of confidence, the t-value from Appendix B.5 is approximately 1.796.

In summary, the t-values for each scenario are: a) 2.145, b) 2.807, and c) 1.796. These values are essential for constructing confidence intervals and hypothesis testing using t-distributions when working with small sample sizes.

To learn more about confidence level click here

brainly.com/question/22851322

#SPJ11

The probability of choosing a student who specialized in photography is 0.2 or 20%.

To calculate the probability that a randomly chosen student specialized in photography, follow these steps:

1. Determine the total number of students at the art camp: 4 (photography) + 16 (other areas) = 20 students
2. Find the number of students who specialized in photography: 4 students
3. The probability of choosing a student who specialized in photography is the number of students who specialized in photography divided by the total number of students: 4/20 = 1/5 = 0.2

So, the probability that a randomly chosen student specialized in photography is 4/20, which can be simplified to 1/5 or 20%.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The location of the test score associated with the third quartile is the value that corresponds to the 123rd rank in a class of 163 students.

The third quartile, also known as the upper quartile, is a statistical measure that divides a set of data into quarters. It is the point at which 75% of the data lies below it and 25% of the data lies above it. To find the location of the test score associated with the third quartile, we need to arrange the test scores in ascending order and then find the value that corresponds to the 75th percentile.

Given that there are 163 students in the class, we can determine the rank of the score associated with the third quartile as follows:

Rank of the third quartile = 0.75 x 163 = 122.25

Since we cannot have a fractional rank, we need to round up to the next whole number. Therefore, the rank of the score associated with the third quartile is 123.

Next, we need to find the value of the test score that corresponds to the 123rd rank. We can do this by using a percentile rank calculator or by manually counting the test scores from the lowest to the highest until we reach the 123rd score.

In summary, the location of the test score associated with the third quartile in a class of 163 students is the value that corresponds to the 123rd rank.

To know more about test score, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28559172#

#SPJ11

To perform an OR operation, we compare the binary digits in each position and return 1 if either or both of the digits are 1.

a. 01010111 OR 11010111 = 11010111

To perform an OR operation, we compare the binary digits in each position and return 1 if either or both of the digits are 1.

Using this rule, we can find that the result of the OR operation of 01010111 and 11010111 is 11010111.

b. 101 OR 110 = 111

The result of the OR operation of 101 and 110 is 111.

c. 11100000 OR 10110100 = 11110100

The result of the OR operation of 11100000 and 10110100 is 11110100.

d. 00011111 OR 10110100 = 10111111

The result of the OR operation of 00011111 and 10110100 is 10111111.

For similar question on OR operation:

https://brainly.com/question/30891881

#SPJ11

The probability that the first card drawn is a 6 and the second card drawn is a 7 is (1/13) × (4/51) = 4/663 or approximately 0.006.

The probability that the first card drawn is a 6 is 4/52 or 1/13 since there are four 6's in the deck and 52 cards in total. The probability that the second card drawn is a 7 given that the first card drawn was a 6 is 4/51 since there are now only three 7's left in the deck and only 51 cards left to choose from.

Therefore, the probability that the first card drawn is a 6 and the second card drawn is a 7 is (1/13) × (4/51) = 4/663 or approximately 0.006.

To compute the probability of two events occurring together, we multiply their individual probabilities if the events are independent, which is the case here since the cards are drawn without replacement.

To know more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The statement that is best supported by the data in the box plots is:

The median of the university is greater than community college.

The interquartile range for community college is greater than for university.

Options A and C are the correct answer.

We have,

From the box plot.

University

Median = 15

Highest hours = 16

Lowest hours = 6

Range = 16 - 6 = 10

First quartile = 9

Third quartile = 15

IQR = 15 - 9 = 6

Community college

Median = 13

Highest hours = 18

Lowest hours = 3

Range = 18 - 3 = 15

First quartile = 6

Third quartile = 15

IQR = 15 - 6 = 9

We see that,

The median of the university is greater than community college.

The interquartile range for community college is greater than for university.

Thus,

The median of the university is greater than community college.

The interquartile range for community college is greater than for university.

Learn more about the interquartile range here:

https://brainly.com/question/29204101

#SPJ1

Answer:

Scatter plots often have a pattern. We call a data point an outlier if it doesn't fit the pattern. A scatterplot plots Backpack weight in kilograms on the y-axis, versus Student weight in kilograms on the x-axis. 5 points rise diagonally in a narrow pattern of points between (40, 4) and (76, 12 and 1 half).

For part a, we know that b = ac - 1. We can rewrite this equation as ac = b + 1. So, all vectors of the form (a, b, c) can be written as (a, b, (b + 1)/a).

For part b, we are given that c = 0. So, all vectors of the form (a, b, 0) can be written simply as (a, b, 0).
For part c, we are given that ab = 7. So, all vectors of the form (a, b, c) for which ab = 7 can be written as (a, b, 7/a).
a. All vectors of the form (a, b, c), where b = a c 1:
These vectors are represented as (a, a*c + 1, c). To create such a vector, you can choose any values for 'a' and 'c', and then calculate the value of 'b' by using the given formula (b = a*c + 1).
b. All vectors of the form (a, b, 0):
These vectors are represented as (a, b, 0). To create such a vector, you can choose any values for 'a' and 'b', and the third component 'c' will always be 0.
c. All vectors of the form (a, b, c) for which a b = 7:
These vectors satisfy the condition a*b = 7. To create such a vector, you can choose any values for 'a' and 'b' that satisfy this equation (for example, a=1 and b=7, or a=7 and b=1), and then choose any value for 'c'. The resulting vector will be of the form (a, b, c).

Visit here to learn more about vectors:

brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

a.)The probability of getting a sum which is a multiple of 3 = 1/3

b.)The probability of getting a sum which is a multiple of 4 = 1/4

To calculate the probability of the given event, the formula that should be used is given as follows;

Probability = possible event/sample space.

For a.)

sample space = 36

possible event = 12

probability = 12/36 = 1/3

For b.)

sample space = 36

possible event = 9

probability = 9/36 = 1/4

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ1

When comparing two population means and the population standard deviations are not known, we substitute sample standard deviations in their place. In this situation, we rely on the t-distribution to conduct the hypothesis test.

When substituting sample standard deviations in place of unknown population standard deviations when comparing two population means, we rely on the t-distribution to conduct the hypothesis test.

Know more about the t-distribution

https://brainly.com/question/17469144

#SPJ11

For a card game with a pack of total 52 cards, where success is that drawn card is face card. The excepted value for this game is - 0.615.

In probability theory, Expected Value is the estimated gain or loss in partaking in an event many times. It is calculated by the formula written as [tex]E(X) = \sum P(X) × X [/tex]

where, X is the number of trials and

In other words, sum of multiplication of probability of gain to gain amount and multiplication of probability of loss to loosing amount. We have a experiment card game. There is a total 52 card deck. Let's consider an event X that one card is drawn from 52.

Number of face cards in pack of 52 = 3× 4 = 12

Number of non- face cards in pack of 52 = 52 - 12 = 40

Probability that drawn card is face card or probability of success = 12/52 = [tex] \frac{ 3}{13}[/tex]

Probability that drawn card is not face card or probability of loss = [tex] \frac{40}{52} = \frac{10}{13} [/tex]

winning amount on probability of success= $4

So, excepted value = [tex]4 \times \frac{3}{13} - 2 \times \frac{10}{13} [/tex]

= [tex] - \frac{8}{13} [/tex] = - 0.615

Hence, required value is - 0.615.

For more information about excepted value, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/10675141

#SPJ4