You wonder if one's age is independent of whether or not one's willingness to wear masks in public. You ask 100 people whether they are wearing masks in public or not and whether they are under 20 years old, between 20 and 39, between 40 and 59, or 60 or above. Using your data, you calculate a test statistic of 16.5. Using a critical value of 7.82, what is your statistical conclusion

Answer:

The value of [tex]x[/tex] is approximately -1.531.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]3.3^{2\cdot x + 1}-103^{x+1} = 0[/tex], we proceed to solve this expression by algebraic means:

1) [tex]3.3^{2\cdot x + 1}-103^{x+1} = 0[/tex]  Given

2) [tex]3.3^{2\cdot x}\cdot 3.3 -103^{x}\cdot 103 = 0[/tex] [tex]a^{b}\cdot a^{c} = a^{b+c}[/tex]

3) [tex](3.3^{x})^{2}\cdot 3.3 -\left[\left( \sqrt{103} \right)^{2}\right]^{x}\cdot 103 = 0[/tex] [tex](a^{b})^{c} = a^{b\cdot c}[/tex]

4) [tex](3.3^{x})^{2}\cdot 3.3 - \left[\left(\sqrt{103}\right)^{x}\right]^{2}\cdot 103 = 0[/tex] [tex](a^{b})^{c} = a^{b\cdot c}[/tex]/Commutative property

5) [tex]\left[\left(\frac{3.3}{\sqrt{103}}\right)^{x}\right] ^{2}-\frac{103}{3.3} = 0[/tex] Existence of multiplicative inverse/Definition of division/Modulative property/[tex]a^{b}\cdot a^{c} = a^{b+c}[/tex]

6) [tex]\left(\frac{3.3}{\sqrt{103}} \right)^{2\cdot x}=\frac{103}{3.3}[/tex] Existence of additive inverse/Modulative property/[tex](a^{b})^{c} = a^{b\cdot c}[/tex]

7) [tex]\log \left(\frac{3.3}{\sqrt{103}} \right)^{2\cdot x}=\log \frac{103}{3.3}[/tex] Definition of logarithm.

8) [tex]2\cdot x\cdot \log \left(\frac{3.3}{\sqrt{103}} \right)= \log \frac{103}{3.3}[/tex]     [tex]\log_{b} a^{c} = c\cdot \log_{b} a[/tex]

9) [tex]2\cdot x \cdot [\log 3.3-\log \sqrt{103}] = \log 103 - \log 3.3[/tex]      [tex]\log_{b} \frac{a}{d}[/tex]

10) [tex]x\cdot (2\cdot \log 3.3-\log 103) = \log 103 - \log 3.3[/tex]     [tex]\log_{b} a^{c} = c\cdot \log_{b} a[/tex]/Associative property

11) [tex]x = \frac{\log 103-\log 3.3}{2\cdot \log 3.3-\log 103}[/tex]   Existence of multiplicative inverse/Definition of division/Modulative property

12) [tex]x \approx -1.531[/tex]  Result

The value of [tex]x[/tex] is approximately -1.531.

Answer:

where is the picture

Step-by-step explanation:

u need a pic

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

27^1/3

= 3√27

=3 is the collect option

To calculate this percentage, we suggest using this formula:

% / 100 = Part / Total

Substituting the provided values:

60/100 = Part / 20

Performing cross multiplication:

60 x 20 = 100 x Part, or

1200 = 100 x Part

Now just divide by 100 and get the answer:

Part = 1200/100 = 12

Answer:

is there anything to go with this?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation: Saw your recent comment on this

slopev=

[tex]diffrence \: in \: y \: coordinate \\ diffrence \: in \: x \: coordinate[/tex]

so

Y=11_5 =6

X = -7_(-3) = -4.

slope = (-4,6)

make as brainlist

Answer:

B, C, E

Step-by-step explanation:

On edge 2021

Answer:

45%

trust me i took this test before

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

n= -10

Step-by-step explanation:

50-20= 30 so -3n=30. So n= -10.

Answer:

n=-10

Step-by-step explanation:

-3n+20=50 move constant to the right hand side

-3n=50-20 subtract the numbers

-3n=30 divide both sides by -3 and the answer is n=-10

Answer:

≈ 70.87 (rounded to the nearest hundredth)

Step-by-step explanation:

-When you do 4,819 ÷ 68, you’ll get:

70.867647058....

-So, just round it to the nearest hundredth:

70.87

Answer:

1.236 × 10^(-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let A be the event that the person is a future terrorist

Let B the event that the person is identified as a terrorist

We are told that there are 1,000 future terrorists in a population of 400 million. Thus, the Probability that the person is a terrorist is;

P(A) = 1000/400000000

P(A) = 0.0000025

P(A') = 1 - P(A)

P(A') = 1 - 0.0000025

P(A') = 0.9999975

We are told that the system has a 99% chance of correctly identifying a future terrorist. Thus; P(B|A) = 0.99

Thus, P(B'|A) = 1 - P(B|A)

P(B'|A) = 1 - 0.99

P(B'|A) = 0.01

We are told that there is a 99.8% chance of correctly identifying someone who is not a future terrorist. Thus; P(B'|A') = 0.998

Hence: P(B|A') = 1 - P(B'|A')

P(B|A') = 1 - 0.998

P(B|A') = 0.002

We want to find the probability that someone who is identified as a terrorist, is actually a future terrorist. This is represented by: P(A|B)

We can find it from bayes theorem as follows;

P(A|B) = [P(B|A) × P(A)]/[(P(B|A) × P(A)) + (P(B|A') × P(A')]

Plugging in the relevant values;

P(A|B) = [0.99 × 0.0000025]/[(0.99 × 0.0000025) + (0.002 × 0.9999975)]

P(A|B) = 0.00123597357 = 1.236 × 10^(-3)

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  $9,437.65

Step-by-step explanation:

Fill in the given numbers and do the arithmetic.

  [tex]V=Pe^{rt}\\\\V=\$6860\cdot e^{0.029\cdot 11}=\$6860\cdot 1.375751\\\\\boxed{V=\$9{,}437.65}[/tex]

Answer:

125°

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the value of x first.

5x = 3x + 50 (corresponding angles are congruent)

Subtract 3x from each side

2x = 50

Divide both sides by 2

x = 25

Angle MPQ = 3x + 50

Plug in the value of x

Angle MPQ = 3(25) + 50 = 125°

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information:

x = number of ads in sports illustrated

y = number of ads in Man's health

Thus, the total ads read by z = (4x +y) million people

The objective function to maximize Z (millions) is:

Z = 4x + y

To determine x & y; constraint to,

x  ≥ 3,  y  ≥  4

Budget constraint:  2000x + 1000y ≤ 14000

By approaching the graphically

If we draw the line x = 3 , y = 4

Then;

2000x + 1000y = 14000

2x + y = 14

Corner points are A (3,4), B(5,4), C(3,8)

At A(3,4):

Z = 4(3) + 1 (4) = 16

At B(5,4):

4(5) + 1 (4) = 24

At C(3,8):

4(3) + 1(8) = 20

Thus, Z = 24 million.    x = 5, y = 4

Therefore;

they should place 5 ads in sports illustrated.

4 ads in man's health to maximize the number of 24 million readers.

Answer:

a. V = $109,600  - $5,750(t)

b.  $69,350

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The expression of the value of the bulldozer is as follows

V = $109,600 - (m) × (t)

where,

m = depreciation

t  = time in years

Now the equation would be

$109,600 - 16(m) = $17,600

m = ($109,600 - $17,600) ÷ (16)

= $5,750

Now the expression would be

V = $109,600  - $5,750(t)

b. Now the value of the bulldozer is

= $109,600 - $5,750 × 7 years

= $109,600 - $40,250

= $69,350

Answer:

what numbers do you need answering??

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

tel:+18446450594

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Its the division of x axis divided by y axis

Answer:

The slope of the line is a measure of its steepness. You can find it with rise/run. The formula for slope is m=y2-y1/x2/x1

Answer:

The answer in a subtraction problem is called the difference.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

The answer to a subtraction problem is called rest or difference while the top thats being subtracted is called the minuend and the middle one is called the subtrahend.

Answer:

It can't be made into a mixed number

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The percentage of 0.20 is 20%.

Step-by-step explanation: 0.20 represents the 20% of 100%.

Answer: 20%

Step-by-step explanation: You just move the dot 2 times to the right and it will be 20%

Answer:

its the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

u just mulitply the terms together and add the exponents

Answer:

10y²+24.5

Step-by-step explanation:

distribute.

10y²+24.5

Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D

The equivalent expression for the given expression is 10y²+24.5.

The given expression is 10(y² + 2.45).

Equivalent expressions are expressions that work the same even though they look different. If two algebraic expressions are equivalent, then the two expressions have the same value when we plug in the same value for the variable.

The equivalent expression is

10(y² + 2.45)

=10y²+24.5

Therefore, the equivalent expression for the given expression is 10y²+24.5.

To learn more about an equivalent expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28170201.

#SPJ2

Answer:

B: Divide by -2

Step-by-step explanation:

The only logical conclusion would be divide by -2, though that may not be the entire correct answer. Why?

Firstly, the sequence of 8, -4, 2, -1 only follows division by -2. Division by 2 would result in 8, 4, 2 and 1, multiplication by -2 would result in 8, -16, 32, -64, and multiplication by 2 would result in 8, 16, 32 and 64. Hence, the only logical conclusion would be division by -2.

However, this rule breaks down as we go into the fractions. -1 / -2 is 1/2, sure, but (1/2) / -2 should be - 1/4, and not 1/4. Hence, as we go into the fractions, the rule should have changed to division by 2 instead.

The only solution to unite the whole sequence would be to correct 1/4 to -1/4, and maybe OP should check whether that is the case.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

b. divided by -2

Step-by-step explanation: