Which type of laboratory is not required to have coved floors (where the floor runs continuous for the wall for a few inches)
The type of laboratory that is not required to have coved floors is a BSL2.
Safety in laboratories is measured through the Biosafety Level scale. This scale evaluates how much protection do people working in the laboratory need to avoid any risks while working with pathogens or toxins.
This scale goes from 1 to 4 and the 4 level represents labs in which extremely dangerous pathogens are studied, and therefore labs with the highest safety protocols.
In this context, coved floors are not required for labs classified in Biosafety level 2 because in these labs pathogens have only a moderate risk, therefore some precautions such as the coved floors are not required.
Learn more about labs in: https://brainly.com/question/14428286
HELPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS DUE IN 17 MINUTES AND THIS IS THE LAST QUESTION I NEED THE ANSWER TO! (((PLEASE ACTUALLY GIVE ME THE ANSWER AD NOT THE LINKY PLEASE!!)))
Answer:
689/1000
hope this helped
how to turn 18/48 into the power of 10 please tell the answer as soon as possible, it's for my semester
The table shows a function. Is the function linear or nonlinear?
Answer:
nonlinear
Step-by-step explanation:
A man has 25 sweets and his son has 55 sweets.find the number of sweets that the man has to give to his son so that his son would have 4times as many sweets as him.
Answer:
9sweets
Step-by-step explanation:
sweets man has to give to his son=x
mans sweets=25-x
child's sweets=55=x
55+x=4(25-x)
55+x=100-4x
4x+x=100-55
5x=45
x=45/5
x=9
Answer: The man has to give nine sweets for his son to have four times as many sweets as him.
can someone pls help quick
True
False - 25% of 50 is 12.5
False - 70% of 80 is the same as 7/10
True
Which expression is equivalent to 5 EXPONENT 4 X5 EXPONENT NEGITIVE 4
Answer:
1Step-by-step explanation:
5⁴ * 5 ⁻⁴ = 5⁴⁻⁴ =5⁰ =1or
5⁴ * 5 ⁻⁴ = 5⁴ / 5⁴ =1what cubed is equal to 1000?
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
Veronica tried to solve an equation step by step.
8 = y - 4.6
8 + 4.6 = y - 4.6 +4.6 Step one
12.6 = y step two
Which step is wrong or are no steps wrong?
PLEASE HELP ASAP! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST JUST PLEASE HELP
Answer:
38cm squared
Step-by-step explanation:
Can someone help me with this one I would appreciate it very much!!
Answer:
12.5 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
16 ounces = 1 pound
200 ounces = 1 × 200/16 = 12.5 pounds
Please help me with this
Answer:
A and F
Step-by-step explanation:
what is pls help someone with the problem?2x + 3 = 9
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
2x+3=9
2x=9-3
2x=6
2 2
x=3
Answer: x = 3
Step-by-step explanation: 2x+ 3= 9
2x +3 -3 = 9 - 3
2x = 6
2x/2 = 6/2
x = 3
You must write all your answers on one line:
Answer:
(A,1) (A,2) (A,3) (A,4) (B,1) (B,2) (B,3) (B,4)
Hope that helped?
PLEASE NO LINKS AND NO NEGATIVITY
Answer:
8.9k
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter is the area around the object.
1.8k - 5 + 3.5 + 6.1k + k + 1.5
Combine like terms:
1.8k + 6.1k + k = 8.9k
-5 + 3.5 + 1.5 = 0
Therefore 8.9k is the answer. You dont need to include the +0 because it will not add anything to the answer. In the most simplified form, the answer is 8.9k
Hope that helps
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Which equation represents the function f(x) = (1. 6)x after it has been translated 5 units up and 9 units to the right? g(x) = (1. 6)x 5 â’ 9 g(x) = (1. 6)x 5 9 g(x) = (1. 6)x â’ 9 5 g(x) = (1. 6)x 9 5.
The equation that represents they function f(x) = (1.6)^x after it has been translated 5 units up and 9 units to the right is;
g(x) = [(1.6)^(x - 9)] + 5
We are given the function;
f(x) = (1.6)^x
Now,when we translate a function 9 units to the right, it means that we will subtract 9 from the x unit to give;
g(x) = (1.6)^(x - 9)
Now, when we translate it 5 units upwards, it means we are adding 5 to f(x). Therefore, we now have;
g(x) = [(1.6)^(x - 9)] + 5
Read more on translation of graphs at; https://brainly.com/question/11468584
-2x(-3x +2)- (x+2)2
giúp tôi với!
Answer:
-32 or 4x -8
Step-by-step explanation:
-2 ( -3x + 2 ) : 6x - 4
= 6x -4 - 2 ( x + 2 )
- 2 ( x + 2 ) : - 2x -4
=6x - 4 - 2x - 4
= 6x -2x - 4 - 4
= 6x - 2x - 8
= 4x - 8
= -32
( Im not really sure what is the answer )
( the "x" is alphabet, not "times" )
Solve for C: C-9(greater than or equal too sign)9
Answer:
[tex]{ \tt{C - 9 \geqslant 9}} \\ \\ { \tt{C \geqslant 9 + 9}} \\ \\ { \rm{answer}} : \: { \tt{C \geqslant 18}}[/tex]
48/?=6
56/?=8
Help me!
3. the answer is 8
6. the answer is 7
Answer:
48/8=6
56/7=8
Step-by-step explanation:
48÷ 8 = 6
56÷ 7 = 8
Plz help ToT I'm horrible at math
Answer: 126
Step-by-step explanation:
A=2(wl+hl+hw)
Please help me:( The volume of the above solid is
O A. 208.87 cm3
O B. 216T1 cm2
O C. 1807 cm3
O D. 2161 cm3
Answer:
the volume of cylinder = πr²h
h = 5cm
r = 6cm
volume = π × 6² × 5
= π × 6 × 6 × 5
= 180πcm³
What is the area, in square centimeters, of the shape below?
Express your answer as a fraction in simplest form.
Therefore, the area of the triangle is 4/9 cm².
Hoped this helped.
[tex]BrainiacUser1357[/tex]
Find the m, b, and write the equation for the following graph:
Answer:
y=3
Step-by-step explanation:
m=0
b=3
Write a compound inequality that the graph could represent.
Answer:
k < -4 or k > 13
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's take a look at the graph, we can see that the arrows point towards both directions, both dots are open, meaning that we can only have < and > signs. We can see that the arrow pointing to the left contains numbers that are less than -4, so that part of the compound inequality must be k < -4. And on the other side, they are numbers that are greater than 13, so that part must be k > 13. Thus, the answer must be d.
Hopes this helps.
A sandbox is a right rectangular prism
that is 6 ft long and 4 ft wide. The
sandbox can hold 48 ft of sand when
full. Lisa fills the sandboxfull of sand.
What is the height of the sand in the
sandbox?
HELP ASAP NO LINKS PLS (OR THEY WILL BE REPORTED) SIMPLE ANSWER PLS
Give two systems of equations that would be easier to solve by substitution than by elimination. Then give two systems that would be easier to solve with elimination. Finally, explain how you decide whether to use elimination or substitution to solve a system.
Answer:
These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher. They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b. Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method. As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important. Some of this may sound completely alien to you. Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n') become larger than 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Just to add a bit more information, "Elimination" Can have a variety of other interpretations. Elimination techniques typically refer to 'row reduction' to achieve 'row echelon form.' Do not worry if you have not heard of these terms. They are used in Linear Algebra when referring to "Elimination techniques"
Gaussian Elimination
Gauss-Jordan Elimination
LU-Decomposition
QR-Decomposition
These techniques for elimination are preferred for 3rd order systems and higher. They use "Row-Reduction" techniques/pivoting and many subtle math tricks to reduce a matrix to either a solvable form or perhaps provide an inverse of a matrix (A-1)of linear equation AX=b. Solving systems of linear equations (n>2) by elimination is a topic unto itself and is the preferred method. As the system of equations increases, the "condition" of a matrix becomes extremely important. Some of this may sound completely alien to you. Don't worry about these topics until Linear Algebra when systems of linear equations (Rank 'n') become larger than 2.
Substitution is the preferred method for 2 equations in 2 unknowns. The constants are unimportant other than having a non-zero determinant. It is always easy to find multiplicative factors using LCMs of one variable or the other to allow substitution into the other equation:
Example:
4X + 5Y = 9
5X - 4Y = 1
Notice that 20 is a LCM of either the X or Y variable. So multiply the first by 4 and the second by 5 and then adding the two (Y's will drop out allowing for substitution)
4(4X + 5Y = 9)
5(5X - 4Y = 1)
Multiplying to produce the LCM factors:
16X + 20Y = 36
25X - 20Y = 5
Adding the equations
41X = 41
X = 1
Substitution into either equation yields
Y = 1
Elimination techniques are preferred for Rank-n>3
Answer:
I like the view
How many ink cartridges can you buy with 225 dollars if
one cartridge costs 15 dollars ?
Answer:
The answer is 15!
Step-by-step explanation:
225 divided by 15 is 15! Hope this helps! :)
The price of 40L petrol is £24, find the price of each litre.
Answer:
1.666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
Step-by-step explanation:
Calculate the speed of an object from 0-1 sec.
Answer:
. 2 m/s
Step-by-step explanation:
Speed is defined as the rate of change in distance per time.
in this case you can simply observe the graph to get the final and initial distances & time.
The motion starts from 0 and moves to 2 if you look at the y axis of the graph.
Thus, the initial distance is 0m & the final distance is 2m
The time is specified in the question to have an initial of 0 sec and a final of 1 sec.
now let's plot our values out as a given.
S1 = 0m t1 = 0 sec
S2 = 2m t2 = 1 sec
and so you're going to have to find the change in time and displacement individually to later engage both in your formula which is - ∆V = ∆S / ∆t
∆S = S2 - S1 = 2m - 0m = 2m.
∆t = t2 - t1 = 1 sec - 0 sec = 1 sec.
∆V = ∆S / ∆t = 2m / 1 sec = 2m/sec (2m/s)
5p coins weigh approximately 3 grams
what would the weight of £5 worth of 5p coins ?
give your answer in kg
Answer:
0.3kg(300g)
Step-by-step explanation:
£1=100p
£5=500p
5p=3g
500p=x
x=500*3/5
x=300g
Step-by-step explanation:
£5 in pence is 500p
The number of 5p coins in 500p is:
500/5 = 100 (5p coins)
each 5p coin weighs 3g
therefore the £5 weighs in grams:
3x100 = 300g
To change to Kg: 300/1000 = 0.3 Kg