Write a function for the number of orders of fries that can be bought with x dollars if an order of fries costs $1.29. Then use your function to find the number of orders of fries that you can buy with $10.

The probability that the sample mean would be less than 23,013 dollars if a sample of 134 persons is randomly selected is approximately 0.0000397.

We can use the central limit theorem to approximate the distribution of the sample mean as a normal distribution, with a mean of μ = 23,037 dollars and a standard deviation of σ/√n = √(149,769/134) = 33.23 dollars.

Then we can standardize the sample mean using the z-score formula:

z = ([tex]\bar{X}[/tex] - μ) / (σ/√n)

where [tex]\bar{X}[/tex] is the sample mean.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

z = (23,013 - 23,037) / 33.23 ≈ -0.722

Using a calculator, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score less than -0.722 is approximately 0.0000397.

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean would be less than 23,013 dollars if a sample of 134 persons is randomly selected is approximately 0.0000397.

This is a very small probability, indicating that it is unlikely to obtain a sample mean this low if the true population mean is 23,037 dollars.

To know more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The values of the sides and the angle in the triangle will be:

AB = 15

m∠A = 53.1°

m∠B = 36.9°

It should be noted that a triangle is a three-sided polygon that consists of three edges and three vertices. The most important property of a triangle is that the sum of the internal angles of a triangle is equal to 180 degrees

From the picture attached,

By Applying Pythagoras theorem,

AB² = AC² + BC²

AB² = 9² + (12)²

AB² = 81 + 144

AB = √225

AB = 15

tan(B) = opposite / adjacent

         = 12/9

         = 1.3333

B will be inverse of town (1.333)

  = 53.13

  ≈ 53.1°

Since, m∠A + m∠B + m∠C = 180°

m∠A + 53.1° + 90° = 180°

m∠A = 180°- 143.1°

       = 36.9°

Learn more about triangles on

https://brainly.com/question/19536442

#SPJ1

The height of the structure is 15 feet.

We have,

Hypotenuse = √261 feet

Base= 6 feet

Using Pythagoras theorem

H² = P² + B²

(√261)² = P² + 6²

261 = P² + 36

261 - 36 = P²

P² = 225

P = 15 unit

Thus, the height of the structure is 15 feet.

Learn more about Pythagoras theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

The quantity of the substance left at any time t > 0 can be found using the formula q(t) = 20 * 2^(-t/3200).The half-life of a radioactive substance is the time it takes for half of the original amount of the substance to decay. In this case, the half-life is 3200 years, which means that after 3200 years, half of the substance will have decayed.

After another 3200 years, half of the remaining substance will have decayed, and so on.

To find the quantity q(t) of the substance left at time t > 0, we can use the formula q(t) = q(0) * 2^(-t/h), where q(0) is the initial quantity of the substance, t is the time elapsed, and h is the half-life of the substance.

In this case, q(0) = 20 g and h = 3200 years. So, the formula becomes q(t) = 20 * 2^(-t/3200).

For example, if t = 3200 years, then q(t) = 20 * 2^(-3200/3200) = 10 g, which means that half of the substance has decayed. If t = 6400 years, then q(t) = 20 * 2^(-6400/3200) = 5 g, which means that three-quarters of the substance has decayed.

learn more about radioactive substances here: brainly.com/question/27164408

#SPJ11

Let's call the cost of the dryer "x".

We know from the problem that the washer costs $68 less than the dryer, so the cost of the washer would be "x - 68".

The problem also tells us that the combined cost of the washer and dryer is $782. So we can set up an equation:

x + (x - 68) = 782

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2x - 68 = 782

Adding 68 to both sides, we get:

2x = 850

Dividing both sides by 2, we get:

x = 425

So the dryer costs $425.

The , th only eigenvalue for the transformation that rotates points by 90 degrees about some axis through the origin is 1.

Let's assume that the transformation rotates points by 90 degrees about some axis through the origin. We can represent this transformation by a matrix A, and the eigenvectors of A will be the axis of rotation. Since the rotation is by 90 degrees, the eigenvectors will be orthogonal to the axis of rotation.

To find the eigenvalues of A, we can use the characteristic equation:

det(A - λI) = 0

where λ is the eigenvalue and I is the identity matrix. Since A is a rotation matrix, its determinant is equal to 1, and we can write:

det(A - λI) = det(A) - λ det(I) = 1 - λ

To find the eigenvalues, we need to solve the equation:

1 - λ = 0

which gives us λ = 1. Therefore, the only eigenvalue for the transformation that rotates points by 90 degrees about some axis through the origin is 1.

Note that the eigenvectors associated with this eigenvalue will be any two orthogonal vectors in the plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation.

Visit to know more about Eigenvalue:-

brainly.com/question/13050052

#SPJ11

Answer:

134

Step-by-step explanation

The type of study described in the question is an observational study.

Specifically, it is a cross-sectional study because data was collected at a single point in time from a representative sample of the population of interest. In this study, the researcher used existing data from the 2014 U.S. National Health Interview Study to explore the relationship between smoking and depression.

The study did not involve manipulating any variables or assigning participants to different groups, which are characteristics of experimental studies. Instead, the researcher examined data on smoking and depression status to see if there was a correlation between the two variables.

Since the study was observational, it is not possible to establish causality or determine the direction of the relationship between smoking and depression. However, the results may be useful for generating hypotheses for further research or informing public health policies related to smoking and mental health.

To know more about  observational study, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17593565#

#SPJ11

The length of the trout that represents the 45th percentile is 32 centimeters.

The trout with a length of 34 centimeters is at the 70th percentile.

From the data:

26, 28, 28, 29, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 36, 36, 37, 38, 38, 40

Using this formula, we can calculate the index of the observation that represents the 45th percentile:

= (45/100) × 20 = 9

For the second part,

= [(14/20) × 100] = 70

This means that the trout with a length of 34 centimeters is at the 70th percentile.

Learn more about percentile on

https://brainly.com/question/2263719

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know the number of 5-letter combinations of 3 consonants and 2 vowels can be formed from the letters of "FORMULATED", and the number that have a vowel at each end.

Since the problem statement uses the word "combinations" instead of "permutations", we take it to mean that "FORMU" is to be considered the same as "FOMRU" and "FUMRO", which have the same letters.

Since the position of the vowels seems to matter, either of the above is considered different from "FORUM" where the vowels are in different places.

The number of combinations of 3 consonants from the 6 in "FORMULATED" is 6C3 = 6!/(3!(6 -3)!) = 20, and the number of combinations of 2 vowels of the 4 given is 4C2 = 4!/(2!(4-2)!) = 6.

The possible arrangements of 2 vowels and 3 consonants in a group of 5 letters is 5C2 = 5!/(2!(5-2)!) = 10.

So, the combinations of 3 consonants and 2 vowels in with vowels in the different possible positions is ...

  20·6·10 = 1200

There can be 1200 different 5-letter combinations.

There is only one of the 10 possible arrangements of consonants and vowels that has the vowels at each end. The number of such arrangements is 1/10 of the total, or (1/10)(1200) = 120.

120 of the letter combinations will have a vowel at each end.

__

Additional comment

More often, we're interested in the number of "words", where letter order matters. If that is intended to be the case, then the number of 5-letter "words" is 6P3·4P2·5C2 = 14400, and the number that have vowels at each end is 1440.

<95141404393>

Jim and Mary, both from Berkeley and of the same age, take separate trips to Los Angeles. Jim travels at a velocity of 65 miles per hour and reaches his destination, where he waits for Mary. The next day, Mary begins her journey, driving at a faster velocity of 70 miles per hour.

Upon arriving in Los Angeles, both Jim and Mary are still the same age. This is because age is a function of time, and both individuals have aged the same amount of time since the start of their journeys. While their respective velocities and travel times may differ, their ages remain equal as they are both progressing through time at the same rate.

In conclusion, Jim and Mary will be the exact same age when they meet in Los Angeles, regardless of their differing travel velocities. The difference in speed does not affect their aging process, as time progresses at the same rate for both of them.

To know more about velocity visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30559316

#SPJ11

To the nearest tenth, the approximate volume of a roll of pennies is 21650.0 mm³.

To find the approximate volume of a roll of pennies, we'll first calculate the volume of a single penny and then multiply that by the number of pennies in a roll (usually 50).

We will use the terms diameter and thickness in the calculation. Here are the steps:
Calculate the radius of the penny by dividing the diameter by 2:
Radius = Diameter / 2

= 19.05 mm / 2

= 9.525 mm.

Calculate the volume of a single penny using the formula for the volume of a cylinder (Volume = π × Radius² × Thickness):
Volume = π × (9.525 mm)² × 1.52 mm ≈ 433.0 mm³
Calculate the volume of a roll of 50 pennies:
Roll Volume = Single Penny Volume × Number of Pennies.

= 433.0 mm³ × 50 ≈ 21650 mm³.

For similar question on volume.

https://brainly.com/question/27535498

#SPJ11

A researcher collected data on the age, in years, and the growth of sea turtles. The following graph is a residual plot of the regression of growth versus age. No, the residual plot does not support the appropriateness of a linear model because the graph displays a U -shaped pattern.

Researchers are employed in practically every industry or are paid to find, examine, and interpret data as well as identify patterns. They are employed in a variety of industries, including academics, science, medicine, and finance. Their workload is influenced by and dependent on their research objectives.

Through the use of the internet, books, articles in the press, surveys, and interviews, they develop information and collect data. No, the residual plot does not support the appropriateness of a linear model because the graph displays a U -shaped pattern.

To know more about Researchers, here:

https://brainly.com/question/18723483

#SPJ1

The set of values that satisfy the inequality is (-2, 0, 2, 4, 6).

Option A is the correct answer.

We have,

We can solve the inequality as follows:

(1/2)x + 3 ≥ 0

Subtracting 3 from both sides:

(1/2)x ≥ -3

Multiplying both sides by 2

(note that since we are multiplying by a positive number, we do not need to reverse the inequality):

x ≥ -6

We see that,

Out of the given sets of values, only (-2, 0, 2, 4, 6) contains values that satisfy this inequality.

Therefore,

The set of values that satisfy the inequality is (-2, 0, 2, 4, 6).

Learn more about inequalities here:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ1

We will use mathematical induction to prove the given statement: Base Case: For n = 1, we have 8 = (7(1)(1) + 2(1))² = (7(1) - 1)² = 49 - 14 + 1 = 36, which is true.

Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that the statement is true for some positive integer k, i.e.,

8 + 15 + 22 + ... + (7k - 1) = (7k(k - 1) + 2k)²

Inductive Step: We need to prove that the statement is also true for k + 1, i.e.,

8 + 15 + 22 + ... + (7(k + 1) - 1) = (7(k + 1)(k) + 2(k + 1))²

Starting with the left-hand side, we can rewrite it as:

8 + 15 + 22 + ... + (7(k + 1) - 1) = (8 + 15 + 22 + ... + (7k - 1)) + (7(k + 1) - 1)

Using the inductive hypothesis, we can substitute the expression for the sum of the first k terms:

(7k(k - 1) + 2k)² + (7(k + 1) - 1)

Expanding the square and simplifying, we get:

49k² + 49k + 14 + 14k + 1

= 49k² + 63k + 15

= 7(k + 1)(7k + 9)

Now, we can rewrite the right-hand side of the statement for k + 1 as:

(7(k + 1)(k) + 2(k + 1))²

= (7k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1))²

= (7k² + 7k + 2k + 1)²

= (7k² + 9k + 1)²

= 49k⁴ + 98k³ + 62k² + 18k + 1

= 7(k + 1)(7k + 9)

This is exactly the same as the expression we obtained for the left-hand side, so we have shown that the statement is also true for k + 1.

Therefore, by mathematical induction, the statement is true for all positive integers n.

Hence, we have proved that 8 + 15 + 22 + ... + (7n - 1) = (7n(n - 1) + 2n)² for all positive integers n.

Learn more about Integers here:- brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

a. There are three independent variables in a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design.

b. There are four possible main effects in a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, one for each independent variable.

c. There are 24 different conditions in a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, which is the product of the levels of each independent variable (4 x 2 x 3 = 24).

d. There are several possible interactions in a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, including two-way and three-way interactions between the independent variables.

a). In a factorial design, the independent variables are systematically manipulated in all possible combinations. In a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, there are three independent variables, each with a different number of levels.

The first independent variable has four levels, the second independent variable has two levels, and the third independent variable has three levels.

Therefore, there are three independent variables in this design.

b). A main effect is the effect of a single independent variable on the dependent variable, averaged across all levels of the other independent variables.

In a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, there are three independent variables, each of which can have a main effect. Therefore, there are three possible main effects in this design.

Additionally, there can be two-way and three-way interactions between the independent variables, which can also affect the dependent variable. However, a main effect is distinct from an interaction effect and is not dependent on any other independent variables.

c).The number of different conditions in a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design is calculated by multiplying the number of levels for each independent variable.

In this case, the first independent variable has four levels, the second independent variable has two levels, and the third independent variable has three levels.

Therefore, the total number of different conditions is obtained by multiplying these three numbers (4 x 2 x 3 = 24). Each condition represents a unique combination of the levels of the three independent variables.

d). Interactions in factorial designs occur when the effect of one independent variable on the dependent variable depends on the level of another independent variable. In a 4 x 2 x 3 factorial design, there are several possible interactions between the independent variables.

For example, there may be a two-way interaction between the first and second independent variables, meaning that the effect of the first independent variable on the dependent variable depends on the level of the second independent variable.

Similarly, there may be a two-way interaction between the second and third independent variables, or between the first and third independent variables.

Learn more about Factorial design

brainly.com/question/29490374

#SPJ11

This can be calculated by adding up the total number of passengers on all five flights (41+39+40+39+33 = 192) and dividing it by the total number of available seats on those flights (69 x 5 = 345). So, 192 divided by 345 equals 0.774 or 77.4%. The load factor for Jim Bob Airlines' last five flights was 55.65%.

To find the load factor for Jim Bob Airlines' last five flights, follow these steps:

1. Add the number of passengers on each flight:
  41 (MSY to DFW) + 39 (DFW to OKL) + 40 (OKL to TUL) + 39 (TUL to FWB) + 33 (FWB to MSY) = 192 passengers

2. Calculate the total number of available seats for the five flights:
  69 seats per flight × 5 flights = 345 available seats

3. Calculate the load factor by dividing the total passengers by the total available seats:
  Load factor = (192 passengers) / (345 available seats) = 0.5565 (rounded to four decimal places)

4. Convert the load factor to a percentage:
  Load factor percentage = 0.5565 × 100 = 55.65%

The load factor for Jim Bob Airlines' last five flights was 55.65%.

Learn more about load factor at: brainly.com/question/30429887

#SPJ11

Answer: x=8

Step-by-step explanation: to get the answer you try to isolate the x you do this by multiplying both side by 10 which you get x= 40/5 which you can simplify so 8

Answer:

The answer to your problem is,

Step-by-step explanation:

So in this problem we will solve for ‘ x ‘

We will make equivalent fraction on the way.

The problem; [tex]\frac{4}{5}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{?}{10}[/tex]

How to find equivalent fractions:

First in order to find equivalent fractions do as I follow:

1. Multiply by 2 for the denominator and numerator

Make it into this fraction, [tex]\frac{4*2}{5*2}[/tex].

2. Solve:

4 × 2 = 8[tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex]

5 × 2 = 10

3. Make into fraction, [tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex] is the answer

Thus the answer to your problem is, [tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex]

The df value for Monica's analysis is 98.

To calculate the degrees of freedom (df) for the Pearson correlation

coefficient, we need to know the sample size, which is the number of

observations or pairs of scores.

In this case, the sample size is 100 because Monica collected data from

100 people.

The formula for calculating the degrees of freedom for the Pearson

correlation coefficient is:

df = n - 2

where n is the sample size.

So, in this case, the degrees of freedom (df) would be:

df = 100 - 2 = 98

Therefore, the df value for Monica's analysis is 98.

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/1781657

#SPJ11

Answer:

25 x 0.01

Step-by-step explanation:

here you go . ..........................................

The area of a regular octagon with sides 1/3 the length of sides of the larger octagon is 173.82 ft sq.

The area of a polygon = n side^2 / (4 tan(180/n))

where "n" is the number of sides

To calculate area for side = 2

area = 8 x 2^2 / (4  tan(180/8))

area = 32 / (4  tan(22.5))

area = 32 / 4 x 0.41421

area = 19.3138746047

To calculate area for side = 6

area = 8*6^2 / (4 * tan(180/8))

area = 288 / 1.65684

area = 173.824871442

173.824871442 / 19.3138746047 =  9

So, the area would be 9 times larger.

Therefore, if we increase the side length is increased by 1/3, then the area increases by 1/9.

Learn more about regular polygon here:

https://brainly.com/question/14173422

#SPJ12

The maximum clearance for the bridge is 16 ft using the formula for parabolic arch.

Parabolic arches are well-known for their superior strength compared to other types of arches. These arches distribute weight more evenly, reducing the amount of stress that is placed on any given point. As a result, parabolic arches are commonly used in the construction of bridges.

In the case of a bridge with a supporting parabolic arch spanning 60 ft with a 30 ft wide road passing underneath, the minimum clearance needed is 16 ft. This means that the maximum height of the arch can be calculated by subtracting 16 ft from the height of the bridge.

To find the height of the bridge, we need to consider the formula for a parabolic arch: y = ax^2. Here, y is the height of the arch at any given point, x is the distance from the center of the arch, and a is a constant. The value of a will depend on the specific dimensions and properties of the arch.

In this case, we know that the span of the arch is 60 ft, so x = 30 ft at the halfway point. We also know that the height of the arch at this point is 16 ft + y, which gives us the equation [tex]16 ft + y = a(30 ft)^2[/tex].

Simplifying this equation, we get:

16 ft + y = 900a

To find the maximum clearance, we need to solve for y when a is at its maximum value. We can do this by finding the maximum value of a, which occurs at the apex of the arch.

The apex of a parabolic arch is located at the halfway point of the span, so x = 30 ft. We also know that the height of the arch at this point is 0 (since it is the highest point of the arch), so we can substitute these values into the formula to find the value of a:

[tex]0 = a(30 ft)^2[/tex]
a = 0

Now that we know that a = 0 at the apex of the arch, we can substitute this value into the equation we derived earlier:

16 ft + y = 900a
16 ft + y = 0
y = -16 ft

This means that the maximum clearance for the bridge is 16 ft, since the height of the arch at the apex is -16 ft (or 16 ft below the height of the bridge).

In conclusion, parabolic arches are known for their superior strength and are commonly used in bridge construction. By using the formula for a parabolic arch, we can calculate the maximum clearance for a bridge with a supporting parabolic arch. In this case, the maximum clearance is 16 ft, since the height of the arch at the apex is -16 ft.

To learn more about parabolic arch, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13742824#

#SPJ11

Normal random variable with mean 500 and standard deviation 100 (a) the probability that five randomly chosen seniors all score below 600 is approximately 0.4437. (b) a student must obtain a score of 766.5 or higher to be in the 99th percentile.

(a) To find the probability that five randomly chosen seniors all score below 600, we need to use the normal distribution formula. We know that the mean (μ) is 500 and the standard deviation (σ) is 100. To find the probability of a score below 600, we need to find the z-score for 600.

z = (x - μ) / σ

z = (600 - 500) / 100 = 1

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a score below 600 is 0.8413. To find the probability of five randomly chosen seniors all scoring below 600, we need to multiply this probability by itself five times.

P(X < 600)^5 = 0.8413^5 = 0.4437

Therefore, the probability that five randomly chosen seniors all score below 600 is approximately 0.4437.

(b) To be in the 99th percentile, a student must score higher than 99% of the population. We can use the normal distribution table or calculator to find the z-score for the 99th percentile.

z = 2.33

Using the same formula as before, we can solve for x (the score needed to be in the 99th percentile).

2.33 = (x - 500) / 100

x = 500 + 2.33(100)

x = 766.5

Therefore, a student must obtain a score of 766.5 or higher to be in the 99th percentile.

To learn more about probability  click here

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The estimate of the standard error of the mean (SE) is approximately 0.359 lb.

The standard error of the mean (SE) is a measure of the precision of the sample mean as an estimate of the population mean. It tells us how much variability there is in the sample means that we would expect if we took many random samples from the same population.

The formula for the SE is the standard deviation of the sample divided by the square root of the sample size.

In this case, we are given the sample mean = 10.85 lb, the sample standard deviation (s) = 4.25 lb, and the sample size (n) = 140 cats.

Using the formula, SE = s/√n, we can calculate the estimate of the SE to be:

SE = 4.25/√140 ≈ 0.359 lb

Therefore, we can estimate that the standard error is 0.359 lb.

To know more about standard error, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30667112#

#SPJ11

A graph of the given angle measures is shown in the image attached below.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a rotation refers to a type of transformation which moves every point of the object through a number of degrees around a given point, which can either be clockwise or counterclockwise (anticlockwise) direction.

In this scenario, we would use an online graphing to calculator to plot or draw each of the angle measures that are provided as shown in the graph attached below.

For instance, we would convert -π/2 to degrees;

θ = -π/2 × 180/π

θ = -180/2

θ = -90 degrees.

Read more on angle of rotation here: brainly.com/question/12428507

#SPJ1

Dilbert's boss was wrong to use the number 40% to assume that the employees were cheating because it only represents a percentage and not the actual number of days that the employees were absent.

In reality, if the workweek is 5 days, then 40% would only be 2 days. Therefore, assuming that the employees were cheating based on this percentage alone is not a fair or accurate assessment. It's important to consider the actual number of days missed by each employee and investigate the reasons for their absence before jumping to conclusions.

While 40% might seem like nearly half of the days in a workweek, it doesn't necessarily imply that employees are cheating. To make a fair assessment, one should consider other factors such as workload, productivity, and employee performance, rather than solely focusing on a percentage.

To know more about percentage click here

brainly.com/question/24120406

#SPJ11

Answer: 240 cubic feet

Thus, the ladder reaches up approximately 11.28 feet of length up the side of the house.

The ladder represents the hypotenuse of a right triangle, the distance up the side of the house represents the opposite side, and the distance from the base of the ladder to the house represents the adjacent side.

Now, we can use the trigonometric function sine to find the length of the opposite side.

sin(70) = opposite/hypotenuse

sin(70) = x/12

x = 12sin(70)

Using a calculator, we can find that sin(70) is approximately 0.9397.

x = 12(0.9397)

x = 11.2764

Therefore, the ladder reaches up approximately 11.28 feet up the side of the house.

In summary, to find the distance up the side of the house that the ladder reaches, we used trigonometry and the sine function. The long answer to this problem explains the steps in detail and provides the numerical solution.

Know more about the trigonometric function

https://brainly.com/question/1143565

#SPJ11

Answer:

(−2,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

If you want to find x and y in this system of equations:

2x − 3y = −19

4x + 5y = 17

You can use elimination to get rid of one variable. Here's how:

First, double the first equation so that x has the same coefficient in both equations.

4x − 6y = −38

4x + 5y = 17

Then, subtract the first equation from the second equation to cancel out x and get a new equation with only y .

(4x + 5y) − (4x − 6y) = 17 − (−38)

11y = 55

Next, divide both sides by 11 to find the value of y .

y = 5

Now, plug in y = 5 into any of the original equations and solve for x .

2x − 3(5) = −19

2x = −4

x = −2

Finally, check that (−2,5) is the correct solution by substituting x = −2 and y = 5 into both original equations.

2(−2) − 3(5) = −19

−19 = −19

4(−2) + 5(5) = 17

17 = 17

So, the answer is (−2,5).

To find the solution for this system of equations, we can use either substitution or elimination method.

1. Multiply the first equation by 5 and the second equation by 3 to eliminate y:

  10x - 15y = -95

  12x + 15y = 51

2. Add the two equations to eliminate y:

  22x = -44

3. Divide both sides by 22 to solve for x:

  x = -2

4. Substitute x = -2 into one of the equations to solve for y. Let's use the first equation:

  2(-2) - 3y = -19

  -4 - 3y = -19

  -3y = -15

  y = 5

Therefore, the ordered pair (-2, 5) is the solution for the system of equations 2x − 3y = −19 and 4x + 5y = 17.