Explanation:
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, New York was a bustling metropolis with a rapidly growing population. As more people moved into the city and housing became scarce, apartment buildings began to appear.
These buildings are often overcrowded, unsanitary and dangerous, making life extremely difficult for those who live there.
Living conditions in apartments are often unbearable. Many families are forced to share small apartments with several other families, each having only one or two rooms at their disposal. These rooms are used as living and sleeping areas with little privacy. Lack of space forced many families to sleep on the floor, and it was not uncommon for several people to share a bed.
In addition to the lack of space, these apartments are often infested with vermin, including mice and cockroaches. These pests carry disease, making homes a breeding ground for disease. In addition, without proper sanitation, human waste is often dumped on the streets or in the courtyards of buildings, creating a dirty and unsanitary environment.
Apartments are also dangerous places to live. Many were poorly built, with weak foundations and poor construction.
Fires are common and buildings often lack proper emergency exits or other safety features. In the event of a fire, tenants are often trapped inside with little chance of escape.
Overall, life in a New York apartment in the late 1800s and early 1900s was tough. Lack of space, sanitation and security make living conditions unbearable for many families. However, the work of social reformers such as Jacob Riis helped bring about significant change, improving the lives of those who lived in apartments and leading to new housing codes and safer buildings.
argentina once had an economy with gdp per capita larger than japan, south korea, and spain. however, since 1900 it has largely failed to grow. the story of argentina highlights how growth is over time and may happen in leaps and spurts. please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices always nonexistent always linear always constant not always constant
Argentina once had an economy with GDP per capita larger than japan, south Korea, and Spain .The correct answer is "not always constant".
The case of Argentina's economy illustrates that economic growth is not always constant over time, and can instead occur in fits and starts. While Argentina was once a prosperous and growing economy, it has since struggled to maintain that level of growth due to a variety of factors, including political instability, economic mismanagement, and external shocks such as commodity price fluctuations and global financial crises. This highlights the fact that economic growth is a complex and multifaceted process that is influenced by a wide range of internal and external factors, and is not always predictable or constant over time.
To know more about economic growth , visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11679822
#SPJ1
In your own words, summarize what happened to Fannie on august 31, 1962
Fannie Lou Hamer was a Black American woman who grew up in the segregated South and became a prominent civil rights activist in the 1960s.
What is the story about?Fannie Lou Hamer, a civil rights activist, gave a powerful testimony before the Credentials Committee of the Democratic National Convention on August 22, 1964, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. She shared her experience of being brutally beaten and arrested for her efforts to register to vote in Mississippi.
Therefore, Hamer also spoke about the systemic discrimination and violence that Black Americans faced in the South and called for a more inclusive and democratic society. Her testimony helped to galvanize support for the civil rights movement and bring attention to the issue of voter suppression.
Learn more about voting from
https://brainly.com/question/1330417
#SPJ1
Fannie Lou Hamer (1917-1977)
Testimony Before the Credentials Committee, Democratic National Convention
Atlantic City, New Jersey - August 22, 1964
Fannie Lou Hamer, a leader of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, speaks before the Credentials Committee of the Democratic National Convention in Atlantic City, August 22, 1964. (AP Photo/stf)
Fannie Lou Hamer's life took a dramatic turn the day she showed up for a mass meeting to learn about voting. It was August 1962 and Hamer, who was forty-four years old, wasn't even sure what a "mass meeting" was. "I was just curious to go, so I did," she said.1 The meeting was organized by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and Hamer was told something she'd never heard before: black people had the right to vote.
One of twenty children born to a family of sharecroppers in the Mississippi Delta, Hamer grew up picking cotton and cutting corn and attended school through the sixth grade. She married a fellow sharecropper and the two scratched out a living doing hard, menial work on a plantation near Ruleville, Mississippi.
According to biographer Sina Dubovoy, when Hamer heard SNCC's presentation, she asked herself, "What did she really have? Not even security." A lynching in a nearby town in 1904 had terrorized blacks then, and the ever-present KKK still kept them quiet. As Dubovoy notes, "The Mississippi Delta was the world's most oppressive place to live if you were black."2 Hamer decided on the spot to register to vote. On August 31, 1962, she boarded a bus to Indianola with seventeen others to try to register to vote. The next day she was kicked off the plantation where she had lived and worked for eighteen years. Her husband lost his job, too.
Hamer immediately went to work as a field organizer for SNCC. Returning home from a training workshop in June 1963, Hamer's bus was intercepted by policemen. She and two others were taken to jail in Winona, Mississippi, and mercilessly beaten. Hamer suffered permanent damage to her kidneys. After recovering from her injuries, she traveled across the U.S. telling her story. With her genuine, plainspoken style, Hamer raised more money for SNCC than any other member.
In 1964, with the support of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), Hamer ran for Congress. The incumbent was a white man who had been elected to office twelve times. In an interview with the Nation, Hamer said, "I'm showing the people that a Negro can run for office." The reporter observed: "Her deep, powerful voice shakes the air as she sits on the porch or inside, talking to friends, relatives and neighbors who drop by on the one day each week when she is not campaigning. Whatever she is talking about soon becomes an impassioned plea for a change in the system that exploits the Delta Negroes. 'All my life I've been sick and tired,' she shakes her head. 'Now I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.'"3
SNCC had formed the MFDP to expand black voter registration and challenge the legitimacy of the state's all-white Democratic Party. MFDP members arrived at the 1964 Democratic National Convention intent on unseating the official Mississippi delegation or, failing that, getting seated with them. On August 22, 1964, Hamer appeared before the convention's credentials committee and told her story about trying to register to vote in Mississippi. Threatened by the MFDP's presence at the convention, President Lyndon Johnson quickly preempted Hamer's televised testimony with an impromptu press conference. But later that night, Hamer's story was broadcast on all the major networks.
In your own words, summarize what happened to Fannie on august 31, 1962
The point of view in the excerpt best supports which of the following historical arguments about United States involvement in the First World War before 1917 ?
Answer:
Explanation:
war is a war and sir syed is sir syed
how did the bubonic plague have a positive impact on european civilizations?
the plague brought benefits as well: modern labor movements, improvements in medicine and a new approach to life. Indeed, much of the Italian Renaissance—even Shakespeare's drama to some extent—is an aftershock of the Black Death.
Why does the U.S. Senate vote on appointments to the president's cabinet?
A.
to provide a check on the power of the legislative branch
B.
to ensure that the president appoints members of his own party
C.
to provide a check on the power of the executive branch
D.
to ensure that citizens' voices are heard through their voting
The 15 executive department heads make up the Cabinet, an advisory body. The members of the Cabinet are frequently the President's closest allies and are chosen by the President and ratified by the Senate.
Why does the U.S. Senate vote on appointments to the president's cabinet?
Throughout the previous 200 years, the Senate has only formally rejected a small number of cabinet nominees. From 1925 and 1989, a 64-year span, there was only one refusal. On June 19, 1959, it took place.
The Senate retains the following authorities for its own use: It confirms the President's appointments with a majority vote and ratifies treaties with a two-thirds supermajority. Ratification of trade agreements and the confirmation of the Vice President both require the House of Representatives' approval.
Positions for PAs (around 400 positions): appointments made by the president that are not subject to Senate confirmation. These are high-level posts, including those in the President's Executive Office such as top advisors and aides in the White House.
Learn more about president's cabinet:
https://brainly.com/question/19817479
#SPJ1
NEED HELP ASAP
Group: African-Americans
1. Who is the group and what civil liberties are they being denied?
2. How can the group persuade the general public to support them?
3. How can their issue be solved?
4. Do you agree that this group should fight for these civil liberties?
5. What other methods might the group use to help ensure they receive their civil liberties?
6. What Constitutional Articles or Amendments are at stake?
Answer:
1.) African-Americans have historically been denied many civil liberties, including the right to vote, access to education, and equal treatment under the law. They have also faced systemic racism, discrimination, and violence, particularly in areas such as housing, employment, and law enforcement.
2.) One way the African-American community can persuade the general public to support them is through peaceful protests and demonstrations, utilizing social media to raise awareness, and engaging in dialogue with community leaders and elected officials. Building strong alliances and coalitions with other marginalized groups can also help amplify their voices.
3.) Solving the issue of civil liberties for African-Americans will require a multi-faceted approach, including reforming policies and practices that perpetuate racism and discrimination, providing greater access to education and economic opportunities, and creating systemic changes in law enforcement and criminal justice.
4.) Yes, they deserve the right to fight for their own civil liberties because every human deserves civil liberties. It would be ethically and morally incorrect for anyone to deny them their civil liberties.
5.) In addition to peaceful protests and building alliances, other methods the African-American community can use to help ensure they receive their civil liberties include voter registration drives, letter-writing campaigns, and legal action, such as filing lawsuits or supporting civil rights organizations.
6.) The Constitutional Amendments at stake for African-Americans include the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which abolished slavery, granted equal protection under the law, and guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race, respectively.
How did General Grant’s total war strategy affect the presidential election of 1864?
It made Lincoln a popular candidate for the Democratic Party, which approved of Grant’s strategy.
It allowed Sherman to capture Atlanta, which increased Lincoln’s popularity in the election.
It horrified many voters in the North, who decided to support Andrew Johnson instead of Lincoln.
It lost Lincoln support among abolitionists, who wanted him to focus on freeing enslaved workers instead.
Answer:
It made people become more wearier and tink carefully to pick someone higghly intellingent
Explanation:
an american politician and attorney who is the 49th and current vice president of the us. she is the first female and first african american vp, who is she?
American politician and lawyer who is the 49th Vice President of the United States and the current Vice President. She's the first woman, the first black VP, Kamala Harris.
Kamala D. Harris is Vice President of the United States. After being elected San Francisco District Attorney, California Attorney General, and United States Senator, she served in public service for the rest of her life before she was elected Vice President. Vice President Harris and sister Maya Harris took inspiration from their mother Shyamala Gopalan. A breast cancer researcher and pioneer himself, Gopalan received his doctorate the same year Vice President Harris was born.
Her parents were activists who instilled in Vice President Harris a strong sense of justice. They took her into her civil rights movement and introduced her to role models, from her Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall to civil rights activist Constance Baker Motley.
Married Douglas Emhoff in 2014. They have a large mixed-race family that includes children Ella and Cole.
Know more about Kamala Harris here:
https://brainly.com/question/30854057
#SPJ4
Use the the source and your own knowledge to explain Birmingham march important to the Civil Rights Movement?
Explanation:
In April 1963 King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined with Birmingham, Alabama’s existing local movement, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), in a massive direct action campaign to attack the city’s segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the Easter season, the second biggest shopping season of the year. As ACMHR founder Fred Shuttlesworth stated in the group’s “Birmingham Manifesto,” the campaign was “a moral witness to give our community a chance to survive” (ACMHR, 3 April 1963).
The campaign was originally scheduled to begin in early March 1963, but was postponed until 2 April when the relatively moderate Albert Boutwell defeated Birmingham’s segregationist commissioner of public safety, Eugene “Bull” Connor, in a run-off mayoral election. On 3 April the desegregation campaign was launched with a series of mass meetings, direct actions, lunch counter sit-ins, marches on City Hall, and a boycott of downtown merchants. King spoke to black citizens about the philosophy of nonviolence and its methods, and extended appeals for volunteers at the end of the mass meetings. With the number of volunteers increasing daily, actions soon expanded to kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county building to register voters. Hundreds were arrested.
On 10 April the city government obtained a state circuit court injunction against the protests. After heavy debate, campaign leaders decided to disobey the court order. King declared: “We cannot in all good conscience obey such an injunction which is an unjust, undemocratic and unconstitutional misuse of the legal process” (ACMHR, 11 April 1963). Plans to continue to submit to arrest were threatened, however, because the money available for cash bonds was depleted, so leaders could no longer guarantee that arrested protesters would be released. King contemplated whether he and Ralph Abernathy should be arrested. Given the lack of bail funds, King’s services as a fundraiser were desperately needed, but King also worried that his failure to submit to arrests might undermine his credibility. King concluded that he must risk going to jail in Birmingham. He told his colleagues: “I don’t know what will happen; I don’t know where the money will come from. But I have to make a faith act” (King, 73).
On Good Friday, 12 April, King was arrested in Birmingham after violating the anti-protest injunction and was kept in solitary confinement. During this time King penned the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” on the margins of the Birmingham News, in reaction to a statement published in that newspaper by eight Birmingham clergymen condemning the protests. King’s request to call his wife, Coretta Scott King, who was at home in Atlanta recovering from the birth of their fourth child, was denied. After she communicated her concern to the Kennedy administration, Birmingham officials permitted King to call home. Bail money was made available, and he was released on 20 April 1963.
In order to sustain the campaign, SCLC organizer James Bevel proposed using young children in demonstrations. Bevel’s rationale for the Children’s Crusade was that young people represented an untapped source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older activists. On 2 May more than 1,000 African American students attempted to march into downtown Birmingham, and hundreds were arrested. When hundreds more gathered the following day, Commissioner Connor directed local police and fire departments to use force to halt the demonstrations. During the next few days images of children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses, clubbed by police officers, and attacked by police dogs appeared on television and in newspapers, triggering international outrage. While leading a group of child marchers, Shuttlesworth himself was hit with the full force of a fire hose and had to be hospitalized. King offered encouragement to parents of the young protesters: “Don’t worry about your children, they’re going to be alright. Don’t hold them back if they want to go to jail. For they are doing a job for not only themselves, but for all of America and for all mankind” (King, 6 May 1963).
In the meantime, the white business structure was weakening under adverse publicity and the unexpected decline in business due to the boycott, but many business owners and city officials were reluctant to negotiate with the protesters. With national pressure on the White House also mounting, Attorney General Robert Kennedy sent Burke Marshall, his chief civil rights assistant, to facilitate negotiations between prominent black citizens and representatives of Birmingham’s Senior Citizen's Council, the city’s business leadership.
what was the name of the treaty in 1915 the allies promised italy the dalmatian coast, in an effort to convince italy to join the allies after it renounced the triple alliance?
The Treaty of London was signed in 1915 between Italy and the Allied Powers. The treaty promised Italy the Dalmatian Coast in exchange for joining the Allied Powers after Italy renounced the Triple Alliance.
The name of the treaty in 1915 that the allies promised Italy the Dalmatian coast is the Treaty of London. Italy initially planned to remain neutral, but when the war began, it had to decide whether to support its ally Austria-Hungary or to take part in the conflict alongside France and the United Kingdom.
The Treaty of London was the document that persuaded Italy to join the Allies after it had abandoned the Triple Alliance. The treaty promised Italy a share of the Central Powers' colonies and a region on the Adriatic coast of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including the Dalmatian coast, if the Allies emerged victorious in the war.
Why was the Treaty of London significant?
The Treaty of London promised Italy a share of the Central Powers' colonies and a region on the Adriatic coast of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including the Dalmatian coast, if the Allies emerged victorious in the war. The treaty was significant in that it enabled Italy to leave the Triple Alliance, which it had joined in 1882, and join the Allies.
The treaty enabled Italy to achieve some of its objectives, such as expanding its territory and consolidating its control over the Italian population in Dalmatia. As a result of the treaty, Italy declared war on Austria-Hungary on May 23, 1915.
Learn more about Treaty of London here:
brainly.com/question/11685952
#SPJ11
Democratic-Republicans Federalists(1) (2)Preferred a weak federal government Hoped to create a national bankWhich pair of phrases best completes this table comparing the Democratic-Republican and Federalist parties?A. (1) Refused to participate in the War of 1812; (2) Was supported by rich merchantsB. (1) Was supported by rich merchants; (2) Strictly interpreted the ConstitutionC. (1) Wanted closer ties to France; (2) Called for a larger national armyD. (1) Was supported by poor farmers; (2) Demanded equal rights for
D. (1) Was supported by poor farmers; (2) Demanded equal rights for all.
The Democratic-Republicans believed in a weaker federal government with more power given to the states.
They also supported a strict interpretation of the Constitution and were more likely to be supported by farmers and laborers. They opposed the creation of a national bank and other policies that favored wealthy merchants and businessmen.
On the other hand, the Federalists believed in a stronger federal government and were more likely to be supported by wealthy merchants and business owners. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to promote economic growth and national security. They also supported a loose interpretation of the Constitution and the creation of a national bank to stabilize the economy.
Overall, the differences between the two parties reflected a larger debate over the role of government in American society, with the Democratic-Republicans favoring a more decentralized government that prioritized individual liberties and the Federalists favoring a more centralized government that prioritized economic and national security.
To know more about federal government click here:
brainly.com/question/20083762
#SPJ4
which river was so badly polluted that it caught fire several times?
The Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, which empties into Lake Erie, was so contaminated that it caught fire! When a blowtorch spark ignited floating trash and lubricants, the first fire started in 1936. The river caught fire multiple times more over the following 30 years.
What ignited the Cuyahoga River?Given its contribution to the environmental movement, the Cuyahoga River is now recognized as an American Heritage River. The Ohio State Scenic River's upper 25 miles have exceptional water quality. Although the bottom half is substantially healthier than it was decades ago, it is nonetheless impacted by the Clean Water Act. Railroad bridges next to Republic Steel caught debris in the river, causing it to build up. The water's flammability was increased by the oil on it. The debris was probably ignited by a flare thrown from an overpassing train. The river was one of the most contaminated waterways in the nation. The river was covered in a foot of oil after 100 years of unchecked factory waste disposal.To learn more about Cuyahoga River, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3887303
mark and carolyn blackburn collection of polynesian art/bridgeman images *french national holiday celebrating the 1789 french revolution **french colonial territory in polynesia, the south pacific question which of the following events would have been most likely to produce a cultural context similar to the one depicted in the image? responses a. the spread of marxist ideas b. the taiping rebellion in china c. the scramble for africa d. the unification of germany
The answer to this question is C: the scramble for africa d. the unification of germany
The Scramble for Africa. This event was a period of time during the late 19th century when several European powers competed to claim territories in Africa.
This competition ultimately led to the establishment of numerous French colonial territories in Africa, which then spread to the Polynesian region of the South Pacific.
The Scramble for Africa, and the subsequent French colonization, would have created a cultural context similar to the one depicted in the image.
TO KNOW ABOUT Scramble:
https://brainly.com/question/30108695
#SPJ11
Would impeaching and convicting the President on these charges set a dangerous precedent and make future Presidents unable to carry out their duties? Or would conviction give Congress the necessary power to limit future attempts by Presidents to exercise too much power?
The decision to impeach and convict President rests with Congress, which must weigh the evidence and determine whether the charges rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
What are crimes?Crimes are acts that are considered illegal and punishable by law. These acts can range from minor offenses such as traffic violations to more serious crimes such as murder, theft, and fraud. Crimes are typically classified into different categories based on their severity, such as misdemeanors or felonies. Misdemeanors are considered less serious offenses and are typically punished with fines or short-term imprisonment, while felonies are more serious and can result in longer prison sentences, probation, or even the death penalty. Some other common types of crimes include drug offenses, assault, sexual offenses, and white-collar crimes such as embezzlement or insider trading. The specific laws and punishments for different crimes vary depending on the country or jurisdiction where they occur.
To learn more about crimes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30137809
#SPJ1
Explain, briefly, why Muslims and Hindus in India did not get along. Use complete sentences in your answer.
Answer:
Ziaur Rahman Azmi says that the reason behind Hindus' negative perception of Islam is mostly the spread of Sufism in India, as he believes Sufism "distorts" the Islamic ideas of Risalat and Tawheed. He claims Sufism includes idolatry, pointing to Sufi mausoleums and the practices of Tawaf and Sijda that occur at them.
Explanation:
in what way was vietnamization a result of the american public’s frustration with the escalation of forces in vietnam?
"Vietnamization was a result of the American public’s frustration with the escalation of forces in Vietnam to end U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War."
Vietnamization was a policy of the Rich-ard Nixon admin-istration to end U.S. involve-ment in the Vietnam War through a pro-gram to "expand, equip, & train South Vietnam-ese forces and assign to them an ever-increasing comb-at role, at the same time stead-ily reducing the num-ber of U.S. combat troops".
The Vietnam-ization plan provided for a gradual, phased with-drawal of American combat forces, combi-ned with an expanded effort to train & equip South Vietnam to take over mili-tary responsibility for its own defense.
To know more about Vietnam War click below:
brainly.com/question/5399403
#SPJ4
National Rifle Association is very powerful in the U.S. Which one of the following theoretical models explains why?
A. C.W. Mills' Power Elite Model
B. Pluralist Model
C. Conflict perspective
D. Looking glass theory
Option B is correct. The following theoretical model that explains why the pluralist model exists.
The pluralist believes that social heterogeneity prevents one group from gaining dominance. Politics, in their view, is essentially a matter of aggregation of preferences. This means that coalitions are inherently unstable (Polsby, 1980) and competition is easily maintained.
Because “political heterogeneity follows socioeconomic heterogeneity,” Dahl believes that social differentiation will increasingly lead to the dispersion of power. In this case, Hamed Kazem Zadeh (Canadian pluralist and human rights activist) argues that organizational membership socializes individuals to democratic norms, increases participation, and relaxes societal policies to enable bargaining and negotiation.
A pluralistic approach to the study of power states that a particular community cannot assume anything tangible about power. whether to To determine this, pluralists look at certain outcomes. The reason is that they believe that human behavior is largely determined by inertia.
But actual involvement in overt activity is a stronger indicator of leadership than mere reputation. Pluralists also believe that there is no particular issue or point at which a group must assert itself in order to be true to its own expressed values, but that there are various groups at which this can be done.
Know more about pluralist here:
https://brainly.com/question/28202152
#SPJ4
What effect did this system have on the social structures of this society? More specifically, what would the treatment of men and women look like?
The effect of Patriarchy system on the social structures of society is that of gender roles, power dynamics, and institutional practices and the treatment is that maen hold primary authority, women are subordinate to men.
What is Patriarchy system?One of the most significant effects of patriarchy on social structures is the establishment of gender roles. Under patriarchy, men are typically expected to be assertive, dominant, and competitive, while women are expected to be nurturing, submissive, and emotional. These gender roles can have a profound impact on the way people interact with one another and the opportunities that are available to them in society.
Patriarchy also affects power dynamics, as men are typically granted more power and authority than women. This can be seen in a wide range of institutions, including government, business, and religion. Women are often excluded from positions of power and decision-making, which can limit their ability to influence social structures and shape policies that affect their lives.
Learn more about Patriarchy system at:
https://brainly.com/question/19795116
#SPJ1
The complete question:
As regards patriach, What effect did this system have on the social structures of this society? More specifically, what would the treatment of men and women look like?
A free-enterprise system uses a _________________ economy
(U.S. Government and Economics)
Answer:
A free-enterprise system uses a capitalist economy.
How were goods primarily transported in the South?
answer choices
by air
by rail
by river
by road
Goods were primarily transported by river in the South. The region had numerous rivers, including the Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri, which served as important transportation routes for goods and people.
Transportation refers to the movement of goods and people from one place to another. It could be done through various means, including rail, road, air, or water. The mode of transportation used depends on factors such as distance, cost, time, and the nature of the goods transported.In the past, the most common mode of transportation in the South was by river. This is because the region had numerous rivers that were suitable for navigation.
Additionally, the rivers were cheap and reliable modes of transportation, particularly for bulky and heavy goods such as agricultural produce. The Mississippi River was one of the most critical transportation routes in the region, with steamboats and flatboats ferrying goods to and from different parts of the region.
For more such questions on transportation
https://brainly.com/question/3521961
#SPJ11
Why did John.Calhoun believe the Tariff of 1828 was unconstitutional?
A.It favored one section of the country over another.
B. It put an end to the cotton trade with Great Britain.
C. It encouraged people to purchase cheap land in the West.
Answer:
A. It favored one section of the country over another.
Explanation:
What happens when the president makes a treaty with another nation? The treaty must be approved by 51 percent of the US population. The treaty must be approved by a two-thirds vote of Congress. The treaty is sent to government agencies for approval. The treaty goes into effect once it is signed by the president. PLEASE HELP QUICK
Answer: 2/3 of congress
Explanation:
Answer:
B! The treaty must be approved by a two-thirds vote of Congress.
Explanation:
How would President Franklin Roosevelt most likely respond to Father Charles Coughlin concerns
about the Works Progress Administration (WPA)?
A. President Roosevelt would listen to the criticism and assure Father Coughlin that the money was
benefiting the nation as a whole by helping the working people.
B. President Roosevelt would agree with Father Coughlin taxation was necessary for the recovery of
the country but private industries must also contribute.
C. President Roosevelt would explain to Father Coughlin that the use of public tax money benefits
industry and commerce as well as individuals.
President Roosevelt would address Father Coughlin's concerns by reducing the taxes used to
support the relief and recovery efforts.
Based on his previous responses to criticism, President Franklin Roosevelt would most likely respond to Father Charles Coughlin's concerns about the Works Progress Administration (WPA) by listening to the criticism and addressing it with a diplomatic approach. Option A is the most likely response from Roosevelt. He was known for being a skilled communicator and for being able to persuade his critics by acknowledging their concerns and explaining how his policies would benefit the country as a whole. He would likely emphasize how the WPA was providing jobs and economic stimulus to the working people, and how this was helping to lift the country out of the Great Depression. Option B is a possibility, but Roosevelt would also argue that private industries were already contributing through taxes and other measures. Option C is also a possibility, but Roosevelt would likely emphasize the benefits of the WPA to individuals and communities, rather than just industry and commerce. Option D is unlikely, as Roosevelt believed that government spending was necessary to stimulate the economy and provide relief to those in need.
Unit 3 Mythology and Folklore Critical Thinking Questions
Please answer the following questions using complete sentences, also please make sure to ANSWER THE QUESTIONS FULLY AND COMPLETELY:
1. Would you say that those characters were destined to become heroes, or do you believe being heroic was primarily a matter of choices they made and that anyone could become a hero? Explain your answer using examples.
2. The shapeshifter and the villain/shadow archetypes are both trying to stop or even kill the hero and prevent him from carrying out his destiny. Which archetype is a bigger obstacle for a hero? Why?
3. The heroes of myths and legends often must face threshold guardians in order to advance on their journey. How does this parallel real life? What are some threshold guardians you have had to face to advance on your journey?
I believe that becoming a hero is primarily a matter of the choices one makes, rather than being destined to become one.
What is the Mythology?While some characters in mythology and folklore may have been born with certain traits or abilities that helped them become heroes, ultimately it was their actions and decisions that led to their heroic status. For example, in the Greek myth of Perseus, he was born with divine lineage and given special weapons and tools, but it was his bravery and cunning in defeating the Gorgon Medusa and saving Andromeda that made him a hero.
I think that the villain/shadow archetype is a bigger obstacle for a hero, because they are actively working against the hero's goals and can be more difficult to overcome. The shapeshifter archetype may be more unpredictable and deceitful, but they can also be allies or sources of wisdom for the hero. In contrast, the villain is usually a more straightforward enemy who will stop at nothing to defeat the hero. For example, in the story of Snow White, the Evil Queen is the primary villain who seeks to kill Snow White and prevent her from becoming the rightful heir to the kingdom.
Therefore, In real life, we often face threshold guardians or obstacles that challenge us on our journey towards our goals. These guardians may take the form of societal norms or expectations, personal fears or doubts, or physical barriers. For example, a threshold guardian for someone pursuing a career in the arts may be the pressure to conform to mainstream tastes or the difficulty of finding financial stability. Someone pursuing a physical challenge like climbing a mountain may face weather conditions or technical difficulties that act as threshold guardians. In my own life, I have faced threshold guardians in the form of self-doubt and anxiety, which have made it difficult to take risks or pursue new opportunities.
Learn more about Mythology from
https://brainly.com/question/25098680
#SPJ1
One effect of the publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin was
A. an increased interest in abolition.
B. the passage of the Missouri Compromise.
C. the birth of the Republican Party.
D.an attack on a southern armory.
A. an increased interest in abolition.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the years between 1781 and 1787 are often ... The national government was too weak to solve the nation's problems.colonies were forced to pay high reparations to England.states were fighting the French and Indian War.southern states threatened to secede from the Union over the issue of slavery.central government lacked the power to deal with major problems.
Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the years between 1781 and 1787 are often characterized by the fact that the central government lacked the power to deal with major problems. The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government that had limited powers and relied on the states to carry out most functions of government. The national government lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate trade, or raise an army, among other things. This meant that the government was unable to effectively address many of the nation's problems, including economic issues, national defense, and foreign relations. As a result, the government was largely ineffective, and the nation struggled to maintain stability and unity under the Articles of Confederation. This led to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which drafted the United States Constitution and created a stronger federal government with more powers to address the nation's problems.
(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)
what happened in gallatin, missouri that helped fan the flame that led to the mormon war in missouri?
In 1838, what happened in Gallatin, Missouri that helped fan the flame that led to the Mormon War in Missouri was the "Election Day Battle at Gallatin" in which a group of Mormons tried to vote during the local elections but was prevented from doing so by non-Mormons.
In the "Election Day Battle at Gallatin" which happened on August 6, 1838, the Mormons (Non-Latter-day Saints) were prevented to vote in the local election by the non-Mormons. Then the Mormons went to the county clerk to file charges, but the clerk refused.
A few days later, a fight broke out between Mormons and non-Mormons in Gallatin, which resulted in the non-Mormons burning down a Mormon-owned store and home. This incident, combined with other incidents of violence and tension between Mormons and non-Mormons in Missouri, helped fuel the Mormon War, which was a series of conflicts between Mormons and their non-Mormon neighbors in Missouri in the mid-19th century.
For more information on Mormons, visit
brainly.com/question/10042595
#SPJ11
according to the following reaction, how many grams of hydrogen peroxide (h2o2) are necessary to form 0.729 moles oxygen gas ? hydrogen peroxide (h2o2)(aq) water(l) oxygen(g)
The given reaction is:
H2O2(aq) → H2O(l) + O2(g)
The balanced chemical equation is:
2H2O2(aq) → 2H2O(l) + O2(g)
This means that for every two molecules of hydrogen peroxide,
one molecule of oxygen gas and two molecules of water are produced. Therefore, the mole ratio of hydrogen peroxide to oxygen gas is 2:1.
Given that 0.729 moles of oxygen gas are required, the number of moles of hydrogen peroxide required can be calculated using the mole ratio.
Moles of hydrogen peroxide = (0.729 moles of oxygen gas) / 2
Moles of hydrogen peroxide = 0.3645 moles
The molar mass of hydrogen peroxide is 34.01 g/mol. Therefore, the mass of hydrogen peroxide required can be calculated as follows:
Mass of hydrogen peroxide = (0.3645 moles) x (34.01 g/mol)
Mass of hydrogen peroxide = 12.38 g
Therefore, 12.38 grams of hydrogen peroxide are necessary to form 0.729 moles of oxygen gas.
In summary, we can use the balanced chemical equation and mole ratios to determine the mass of hydrogen peroxide required to form a given amount of oxygen gas.
To know more about balanced chemical equation here
https://brainly.com/question/28294176
#SPJ11
What happened concerning slavery as a result of the Civil War? a. The 13th Amendment abolishes slavery. b. The 12th Amendment abolishes slavery . c. The 10th Amendment abolishes slavery.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
The 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1865 in the aftermath of the Civil War, abolished slavery in the United States.
Can somebody explain to me what this text is saying (summarize)
The text is saying that the world is currently facing a choice between two ways of life - one where the majority has a say and one where a minority forces their will on the majority. The United States believes in supporting free peoples who resist being conquered by minority groups or outside pressures, and the free peoples of the world rely on US support to maintain their freedoms.