why are archeological sources comparatively less important for the modern period

While there are a handful of defined methods for working with primary historical sources in archaeology, few archaeologists take these as their main points of departure or rely upon them too rigidly. This is to do both with the highly variable nature of the historical and archaeological material available for certain African contexts, and also with how archaeologists conceive of the relationship between these two bodies of evidence: as antagonistic, supplementary, entangled and subjective, mutually creative, and so on. Some methodologies focus on the potentials for consonance and dissonance between written and material sources. Others utilize oral traditions to provide insights into chronology, memory, historical and political dynamics, and the material aspects of these. Still other approaches focus on how historical and archaeological sources offer complementary perspectives on the local and the global, events and processes, and other shifts in scale. While these methods are diverse and contingent, they are united insofar as archaeologists take their cues from objects and from preoccupations with time and space. Archaeologists see their work concerning primary historical sources not as filling in gaps in written records but as addressing the partialities of the records themselves by engaging with an array of complex questions about meaning, authority, and materiality

Because written records and other forms of documentation, which offer more thorough and accurate information about the past, characterize the modern period, archaeological sources are relatively less significant for it.

What is archeological sources?

They consist of historical structures, coins, inscriptions, and other remains, as well as tangible proof of past human activity. Archaeological sources are the tangible evidence, ruins, or remnants of items or built buildings from the past.

By examining physical artifacts that people have made, altered, or used in the past, archaeologists can learn about human history. We now know more about our past thanks to archaeological sources, which also gave us access to crucial information that would not have been possible otherwise.

As a result, the significance of the archeological sources comparatively less important for the modern period are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on archaeological sources, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28271784

#SPJ2

Hellpppp plleaseeeeeee