Answer:
state of south carolina
The state tried to nullify federal laws In American history, there have been three notable attempts by states at nullification. First, the 1798 attempts by Kentucky, South Carolina, and Arkansas to invalidate the Alien and Sedition Acts, two federal tariff statutes, and Brown v. Board of Education, respectively.
What is the state?The state entries Produce an array with arrays representing the enumerable string-keyed property key-value pairs that are directly three notable attempts by states at nullification. First, the 1798 attempts by Kentucky, on the object as its elements. The only difference between this and using a for...in the loop is that a for...in the loop also enumerates attributes in the prototype chain.
John C. Calhoun, a politician from South Carolina, spearheaded it. He opposed the federal government's imposition of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 and claimed that states had the power to prevent the enforcement of federal law under the U.S. Constitution.
The Virginia General Assembly had already approved Madison's Report of 1800 prior to Marbury. It allowed states could proclaim certain federal laws to be illegal, but such a proclamation would be meaningless absent court approval.
Therefore, Three prominent attempts at nullification by states. Kentucky attempts from 1798,
Learn more about the state here:
https://brainly.com/question/15858706
#SPJ2
Both political parties try and win a majority of the votes by appealing to the center of the political O spectrum O platform O finance.
Answer:
Platform
Explanation:
What is one reason sumerians started trading?
A) they needed more food to survive
B) they had a surplus of food
C) they needed to make more money to help build their civilization
D) they secretly wanted to spy on other civilizations
Answer:
b
Explanation:
I think it would be b it makes the most sense hope this helps you.
Answer:
b ) they had a surplus food
What did the Anti-Federalists demand before they would ratify the Constitution?
Answer:
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Explanation: