Which of the following groups was the greatest advocate for the prohibition of alcohol in the United States

The House of Representatives is the chamber of Congress that should get things going. The United States Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1, addresses it.

The House of Representatives refers the tax bill to the Ways and Means Committee at the beginning of the process. The committee members draft a proposed bill once they have agreed on the proposal. The authority to introduce laws containing taxes or tariffs belongs to the House of Representatives. The Senate can adopt, reject, or change the tax bill after this house initiates the process, just like it would with any other piece of legislation. The bill is sent to the President for signature if it is approved by both chambers. The U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1, addresses the House of Representatives right to submit tax bills.

Learn more about The House of Representatives here:

https://brainly.com/question/30196476

#SPJ4

As the U.S. military enlisted young men, civilians were asked to contribute by purchasing War bonds, giving to charities, or, if they worked in industry, going above and beyond for the troops.

To learn more about World war here

https://brainly.com/question/446364

#SPJ4

Some of the acts passed against the Colonists by 1770 included the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, and the Townshend Acts. These acts imposed taxes on the Colonists and restricted their trade.

2. Since 1764, tensions had been high in Boston due to the presence of British soldiers. The purpose of this invasion was to maintain order and enforce the acts passed by the British government. This caused resentment and anger among the Colonists, leading to increased tensions between the Colonists and the Red Coats.

3. The entire event began when a group of Colonists confronted a Red Coat sentry and started throwing objects at him. The sentry called for backup, and a group of Red Coats arrived to confront the Colonists. It is difficult to say who was in the right, as both sides likely had valid points of view. The Colonists were angry about the acts passed against them and the presence of British soldiers in their city, while the Red Coats were trying to maintain order and protect themselves from being attacked.

4.  The interaction between the Red Coats and the Colonists escalated into a bigger, more violent problem because both sides were tense and on edge. The Colonists were angry and frustrated, while the Red Coats were likely feeling threatened and outnumbered.

5. The Colonists were showing the Red Coats their hatred by protesting and throwing objects at them.

6. The Red Coats' reaction to the Colonists was to try to maintain order and protect themselves. This likely included using force to disperse the crowd.

7. After the Massacre, eight Colonists were killed and several others were injured. The Red Coats involved in the incident were arrested and put on trial. Some were found guilty and punished, while others were acquitted. It is subjective to say whether or not this was a fair outcome, as it depends on one's perspective and values.

The Colonists were the people who lived in the British colonies in America, including the 13 colonies that would eventually become the United States. They were mostly of English descent, but there were also many other ethnicities represented among the Colonists.

The Red Coats were British soldiers who wore red coats as part of their uniform. They were sent to the colonies to enforce British rule and maintain order. The Colonists often referred to them as "Red Coats" due to their distinctive uniforms.

Therefore, The Red Coats were not well-liked by the Colonists, as they were seen as a symbol of British oppression and the acts passed against the Colonists. Tensions between the Colonists and the Red Coats were high, leading to conflicts such as the Boston Massacre.

Learn more about  Red Coats from

https://brainly.com/question/7298725
#SPJ1

Richard Nixon, a Republican running for president and a former vice president, defeated his rivals in the 1968 presidential election.

Election for President in 1968. Hubert Humphrey, a Democrat, and George Wallace, an Independent, were defeated by Republican contender and former vice president Richard Nixon in the 1968 presidential election. It's possible that this election, like the realigning election, has led to significant changes in the political landscape. However, it was also tainted by other catastrophes, such as the murder of President Robert Kennedy, one of the Democrats' nominees. Following the social upheaval, questions around American involvement in the Vietnam War, and other related topics all came to a head, significantly disrupting the election scene. Hubert Humphrey, the current vice president, was chosen as the candidate in the 1968 Democratic National Convention, which took place in Chicago, Illinois, from August 26 to August 29, 1968.

Learn more about The Presidential election here:

https://brainly.com/question/15296467

#SPJ4

The Amendment was passed to bring unity amongst the hugely divided Americans at that time. Slaves were being freed during this period. The former slaves were free but some states especially in the South placed cruel restrictions against the free folk. This was becoming a problem because there was clear tension in the air. The Congress decided to counter this with the 14th Amendment which insisted on equal rights for any American citizen, no matter the race.

The other reason was pushed forward by a slave known as Dred Scott. He tried to file for citizenship along with his wife and daughter. The supreme court sadly refused his proposal. Although he was unsuccessful, he sparked a conversation that would have even the white citizens demand equal rights for the African Americans. To quel this fire, the 14th Amendment was passed making it legal for African Americans to become legal citizens.

Consider reading more about the 14th Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29766420

#SPJ4

The Coercive Acts of 1774 were a set of four laws passed by the British Parliament as retaliation against Massachusetts Bay for the Boston Tea Party.

The supreme legislative body of the United Kingdom, Crown Dependencies, and British Overseas Territories is the British Parliament.

It holds meetings in London at the Palace of Westminster.

It alone has absolute control over all other political entities in the UK and overseas territories since it has the strongest legislative authority.

The King-in-Parliament, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons make up the three chambers of the bicameral parliament (the primary chamber).

The British Parliament passed the Coercive Acts of 1774, sometimes known as the Intolerable Acts in the American colonies, as a package of four pieces of legislation to punish Massachusetts Bay for the Boston Tea Party.

Therefore, the Coercive Acts of 1774 were a set of four laws passed by the British Parliament as retaliation against Massachusetts Bay for the Boston Tea Party.

Know more about the British Parliament here:

https://brainly.com/question/5610082

#SPJ4

Tennesseans went out of their way to help in any way they could in the revolution against British, Cherokees and Native American forces who were trying to subdue the colonists.​

Since the 1780 Battle of King's Mountain, when hundreds of Tennessee militiamen helped turn the tide of the Revolutionary War in the South, Tennessee has been known as the Volunteer State.

The only battle fought within the current boundaries of Tennessee was at Boyd's Creek, against the Cherokees, who were British allies at the time.Although the Treaty of Paris was signed with Great Britain in 1783, the Indian Wars raged in Tennessee and other American frontiers for another twelve years, until the Treaty of Greenville, a peace treaty with British-allied Indians, was signed in 1795.

Read more about Tennesseans

brainly.com/question/3945797

#SPJ1

Peter Romanov who is popularly known as Peter the great was a despot because he ruled Russia in eighteenth-century , a time where despotism was needed to properly run a government. He is often seen as an enlightened despot.

Peter the Great was an eighteenth century ruler of Russia who together with his half brother began ruled Russia from 1682 to 1696. He further ruled Russia alone from 1696 to 1725.

In 1721, Peter the Great was proclaimed emperor.  He was one of his country’s greatest statesmen who brought organization and reformation the Russia.

In history, Peter the Great is credited with the modernization of present Russia and its transformation into a very important power in Europe.

He is regarded as a despot due to his high handedness although he was often seen as an enlightened despot.

Learn more about Peter the Great at https://brainly.com/question/1010194

#SPJ1

Nigerian literature manifests the struggles of a people whose country is undergoing the painful process of transformation from colonial through neo-colonial to wholly self-determining nation.

The Holocaust was made possible by factors such as Antisemitism

economic political instability , lack of democratic institutions ,propaganda

The Holocaust was a systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of millions of Jews and other minority groups by the Nazi regime during World War II. There were several risk factors and warning signs that made the Holocaust possible, including:

To know more about Holocaust click below:

https://brainly.com/question/321509#

#SPJ4

A legal fight one of the reasons mentioned why workers go on strike, per the provided statement.

The effects of all living and non-living entities on human life could well be epitomized as the environment. River, land, moonlight, rocks, and breath are examples of non-living or environmental components, whereas all living or biotic elements include animals, plants, flowers, fisheries, and birds.

Human health and happiness are directly impacted by the state of the environment. Good natural surroundings give spiritual and psychological inputs for business, clean air and water, fertile ground for producing food, and so on.

To know more about Environmental visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12275614

#SPJ1

Improvements in sanitation and cleanliness, the discovery of antibiotics, and the establishment of mandatory childhood immunization programs all contributed to the control of the disease.

To learn more about the disease here

https://brainly.com/question/934133

#SPJ4

The Red Fort and Taj Mahal are both famous landmarks in India, but they are quite different from each other. The Red Fort, also known as the "Lal Qila," is a historic fort in the city of Delhi that was built in the mid-17th century. It is made of red sandstone and is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The Taj Mahal, on the other hand, is a mausoleum located in Agra, Uttar Pradesh. It was built in the early 17th century and is also a UNESCO World Heritage Site. It is made of white marble and is considered one of the most beautiful buildings in the world. So, the main difference between the two landmarks is their location, the materials they are made of, and their purpose.

Answer:

Explanation:

The main difference between Red Fort and Taj Mahal is their location. Red Fort is located at Delhi and Taj Mahal is located at Agra.

Red Fort and Taj Mahal were  built by Shah Jahan. But Red Fort is used for Administration and Taj Mahal illustrates the love between Mumtaz and Shah Jahan.

The Sprio people disappear because of extended drought and political infighting which make it difficult to survive.

The Spiro archaeological finds provide crucial new information about the ancient Mississippian people's culture. The Pocola Mining Company, a collection of neighborhood folks, had discovered Spiro Mounds.

The disappearance of these people has been observed due to changes in climatic conditions which create harsh conditions of living and make it difficult to manage survival.

Native Americans from North America constructed the Norman mounds during prehistoric times. Employees from Pocola recklessly dug into the burial mound.

Learn more about Mound, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17290131

#SPJ1

Congress created the Freedmen's Bureau, officially known as the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, in 1865 to aid the millions of emancipated African slaves.

Some recently freed slaves promptly left the area where they lived, while others worked as wage workers for their former masters. Most crucially, African Americans had the freedom to decide for themselves where and what kind of employment they would do.

Following the Civil War, life for many freedmen in the South was not socially egalitarian, with many of them inhabiting the lowest social strata. In the South, racism was still pervasive and even institutionalised. The Freedmen's Bureau had its greatest success in the area of education.

To know more about Freedmen, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16816388

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Growth of African manufacturing

Explanation:

Her unrelenting commitment to women's suffrage led to the Constitution's 19th amendment, which gave women the right to vote the views of Elizabeth Cady  Stanton

To know more about Elizabeth Cady Stanton here

https://brainly.com/question/24781064

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Harlem Renaissance was a cultural movement that occurred in the 1920s and 1930s. It was centered in Harlem, a neighborhood in New York City with a large African American population. The Harlem Renaissance was caused by a variety of factors, including the Great Migration, which saw millions of African Americans leave the rural South and move to urban areas in the North and West. This movement led to a concentration of African Americans in Harlem, which in turn created a critical mass of artists and intellectuals who were able to nurture and support each other's creative endeavors.

The Harlem Renaissance had a number of significant effects. One of the most important was the way it helped to promote African American culture and pride. During this time, African Americans were able to celebrate their heritage and express their unique cultural identity through art, literature, music, and other forms of creative expression. This had a profound impact on the African American community and helped to pave the way for the civil rights movement that would follow in the decades to come. The Harlem Renaissance also had a broader impact on American culture, influencing everything from literature and art to music and fashion.

Old World (Europe, Africa, and/or Asia)

Political Short-term effect: The Old World experienced a significant expansion of European colonial empires, as European powers sought to gain control over new territories and resources. This led to the conquest and colonization of many parts of the world, and had significant political effects on the societies and governments of the colonized regions.

Political long-term effect: The long-term political effects of colonialism included the establishment of new forms of government, such as colonial administrations and puppet states, and the creation of new social and economic systems that often benefited the colonizers at the expense of the indigenous populations. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the political landscape of many countries in the Old World and around the globe.

Economic short-term effects: The economic effects of colonialism were varied, but in general, the colonizers benefited greatly from the exploitation of natural resources and the labor of the colonized peoples. This often led to a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the colonizers, while the colonized societies often experienced economic disruption and decline.

Economic Long-term effects: In the long term, the economic effects of colonialism were often mixed. While some colonized countries were able to develop strong economies and become major players in the global economy, others were left with fragile economies and a dependence on the colonizers for trade and resources. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the economic landscape of many countries in the Old World and around the globe.

New World (The Americas and Caribbean)

Political Short-term effect: The arrival of European colonizers in the New World had significant political effects on the indigenous populations of the Americas and the Caribbean. Many indigenous societies were conquered and subjugated by the Europeans, and their political systems and forms of governance were largely dismantled.

Political long-term effect: The long-term political effects of European colonization in the New World included the establishment of new forms of government, such as colonial administrations and later independent states, as well as the continued influence of European political systems and values on the political development of the region. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the political landscape of many countries in the New World.

Economic short-term effects: The economic effects of European colonization in the New World were largely negative for the indigenous populations, as they lost control over their lands and resources and were often exploited for labor. The colonizers, on the other hand, benefited greatly from the exploitation of natural resources and the labor of the indigenous peoples, and the region became an important source of wealth for the European powers.

Economic Long-term effects: In the long term, the economic effects of European colonization in the New World were mixed. Some countries in the region were able to develop strong economies and become major players in the global economy, while others were left with fragile economies and a dependence on foreign trade and investment. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the economic landscape of many countries in the New World.

Answer:

Old World:

Political Short-Term Effect: The transfer of diseases can negatively impact the interactions between governments due to the fear of spreading diseases. This cause could harm the political powers that lie within the government.

Political Long-Term Effect: The government couldn't run its course because of the diseases. They feared them and the harm that they could cause so there wasn't much ruling going on. within the government.

Economic Short-Term Effect: The spread of diseases could affect trade because it could spread to the or animals that are being traded. This could lead to less money being ma from trade and could harm the economy.

Economic Long-Term Effect: Diseases like smallpox that came about not only affected the people but the environment. Some plants and animals got these diseases and becaus this the economy began to fail. They didn't have any crops to trade and so they weren't making any money and they had less laborers working because of the diseases and so this is another reason they weren't being able to make money.

New World:
Political Short-Term Effect: Since the age of exploration was prompted by many events in Europe the New Worlds were introduced to rising of nationalism, capitalism, and the mercantile system. These were going to be used to help them build up their empires in the New World.

Political Long-Term Effect: In the New World, the empires that were being built used the three new ideas that were introduced to them, and this led the colonies established by the Spanish to create a system called the encomienda system. It caused the French and the Spanish to encourage settlement and the religious conversion of the natives in their colonies. It led the English to encourage large-scale settlement in colonies, they didn't develop a system of native slavery, and they wanted to acquire land the same way they did in England and to meet that the British colonists were allowed to govern themselves.

Economic Short-Term Effect: New goods were being brought to the New World that they didn't have before. This led to new goods being able to be traded and this was good for the economy. because trade would have increased allowing them to make more money.

Economic Long-Term Effect: When trade increased because of the new goods being traded more and more people came to the New World and stayed there. The new goods and the new people that came caused the New World's economy to shift toward capitalism.

Explanation:

A country that is multiethnic has several major groups of people with different cultures. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.

A multinational union or state is a sovereign body made up of two or more countries or states. In contrast, in a nation-state, the majority of the population comes from only one nation. There are hundreds of minor ethnic and tribal groups living in the complex, multiethnic nation of India. That intricacy resulted from a protracted and intricate history of marriages and migration. No ethnic group has a majority in the multiethnic nation of Montenegro.

Learn more about multiethnic culture, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29910442

#SPJ1

On September 3, 1957, when Governor Orval Faubus activated the Arkansas National Guard in an effort to stop nine African American students from integrating the high school, the desegregation of Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, attracted widespread notice.

Nine African American pupils who attended Little Rock Central High School in 1957 became known as "The Little Rock Nine." Following their admission came the Little Rock Crisis, in which the pupils were first denied entry to the racially segregated school by the governor of Arkansas, Orval Faubus.

Courts and the federal government placed pressure on local districts to integrate, school segregation significantly decreased. However, same initiatives also gave rise to vehement, occasionally racist, pushback that influenced political discourse for years.

To learn more about integrating the school, refer

https://brainly.com/question/12088905

#SPJ4

Lewis observed Shoshone tribe that had mixed traits of the mountains and plains cultures, living part of the year on salmon and roots in the mountain valleys.

For many centuries, the Shoshone people inhabited the present-day states of Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Idaho. Several tribal members were able to move over considerable distances to hunt various species of game to support their family once horses were brought to the tribe in the early 1700s. Their Plains horse culture was well-known and, their way of life was radically altered.

They developed into skilled hunters and ferocious warriors as a result. After the Bear River Massacre, white settlers invaded traditional Northwestern Shoshone territories without any resistance. The few surviving Northwestern Shoshones lost the land base as American towns built all around them, making it impossible for them to continue living as nomads.

Know more about Shoshone here

https://brainly.com/question/1827270

#SPJ4

Members of WASP received training as pilots and went on to test fly, ferry, and instruct other pilots. In order to free up male pilots for combat missions during World War II, they were created.

A courageous and devoted group of pilots known as the Women Air Force Service Pilots (WASP) assisted the United States in winning the aerial battles of World War II. They didn't immediately take part in the battle. However, they did replace men who could and did engage in aerial combat. The women worked as civilians rather than military personnel. With the exception of the instruction that dealt with warfare, their training was almost equal to that of male pilots. The WASP training program received 25,000 applications from women; 1,830 were accepted, and 1,074 finished the program and were placed in operational service. They were tasked with delivering planes to various airfields across the nation.

The P-38 and F-5, P-39, P-40, P-63, C-54, C-46, B-26, and B-24 were among the 77 different types of aircraft that WASP eventually flew. Despite the fact that ferrying was the WASP's first and primary responsibility, female pilots were sent to the Training Command in 1943 where they gunnery towed targets and acted as flight instructors. Fighter plane ferrying became the primary WASP task after April 1944.

To know more about World War II visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/28927253

#SPJ4

The New Deal, in Huey Long's opinion, was as perplexing as star studies in its complexity. He claimed that the new laws created as a result were deceiving the populace and making their lives miserable.

Between 1933 and 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented a number of initiatives, including public works projects, financial reforms, and regulations under the umbrella of the "New Deal."

It responded to the Great Depression's requirements for relief, reform, and recovery.

However, not everyone supported it, and Huey Long was among those who did. He claimed that the New Deal and the laws enacted as a result were as perplexing as a star study.

Due to the legislation created as a result, a small-time tailor who charged 5 cents less than the amount specified in the rule book ended up in jail.

Huey Long believed that the New Deal was as intricate and confusing as star studies.

The new rules that were enacted as a result, according to him, were misleading the public and making their lives unpleasant.

Therefore, the New Deal, in Huey Long's opinion, was as perplexing as star studies in its complexity. He claimed that the new laws created as a result were deceiving the populace and making their lives miserable.

Know more about the New Deal here:

https://brainly.com/question/936437

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Use the excerpt from Huey P. Long's "Share Our Wealth" speech, given on March 12, 1935, to answer the question.

And they proceeded with the NRA. Everything from a peanut stand to a powerhouse had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. If a peanut stand started to parch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. One slip and he went to jail. A little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule

book. So they wrote their NRA rule book, codes, laws, etc. They got up over 900 of them. One would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. It would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail. In 3-5 sentences, analyze Huey Long's criticism of the New Deal. Cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis.​

The answer is A: larceny

.Larceny is a form of crime that involves taking the property of another person or business unlawfully. This form of crime has been broken down into more precise definitions that certain jurisdictions around the world have implemented (like robbery, burglary, and theft), but in some countries,  like in the USA, it is still an offense that involves, very precisely, the taking of somebody else´s property and carrying it away with you.  

The negative effects of increased extreme rainfall episodes on agricultural output generally outweigh the positive effects of higher precipitation over the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.

The origin of human civilization is in Africa. Between one and two million years ago, homo erectus, sometimes known as the "upright man," made its initial appearance in East Africa. Early humans initially developed tools, language, and fire control in Africa.

The Congo Basin is the largest of the huge, tropical basins found in Sub-Saharan Africa, which also includes the rift valley. Highland and plateau zones are also present in this continent. The Congo River, the greatest river in Africa by discharge and the deepest river in the world, drains into this basin, which starts in the highlands of the rift valley.

Learn more about Sub Saharan Africa

https://brainly.com/question/15661110

Answer: Essay on "What would happen if the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights?"

Gave it my best shot, hope this helps :)

The concept of balancing rights is a fundamental aspect of any functioning society. It is the idea that the rights of individuals must be weighed against the rights of the community as a whole in order to ensure a just and fair society. If the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights, it would have a profound and negative impact on society as a whole.

One of the most immediate consequences of prioritizing individual rights over community rights would be an increase in social and economic inequality. If individuals were allowed to pursue their own interests without regard for the well-being of the community, those who are more powerful and affluent would have an unfair advantage over those who are not. This would lead to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, while the majority would be left to struggle in poverty and marginalization.

Additionally, the lack of community rights would lead to a breakdown in the social contract that holds society together. The social contract is the idea that individuals give up some of their rights in exchange for the protection and benefits provided by society. If the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights, individuals would have no incentive to contribute to the common good, and society would become fragmented and uncoordinated.

Another major consequence of prioritizing individual rights over community rights would be the erosion of individual rights themselves. In a society where the rights of the community are not respected, individuals would have little protection against the abuse of power by those in positions of authority. This would lead to a loss of freedom, democracy, and human rights.

Furthermore, when the rights of the community are not given priority, it leads to a lack of trust between individuals, making it hard for them to collaborate and work together. People would have difficulty in expressing their opinions freely and openly, stifle innovation and creativity, and resulting in a stagnant society.

In conclusion, it is essential that the rights of the community are given priority in the balance of rights. This is the only way to ensure a just and fair society that is able to meet the needs and aspirations of all its members. Without the protection and promotion of community rights, society would be plagued by inequality, social fragmentation, and the erosion of individual rights.

The dangers of political parties and factions was an idea that was  part of George Washington's Farewell Address.

One key idea in George Washington's Farewell Address was the importance of unity and national cohesion, and the dangers of political parties and factionalism. He warned against the destructive effects of "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" who would try to use divisions within the country for their own gain. He also emphasized the importance of civic virtue and morality in maintaining a strong republic.

George Washington's Farewell Address was a statement written by him in 1796 as his presidency came to a close. He chose not to seek a third term and instead decided to retire from public life. In his Farewell Address, he addressed the American people and offered his thoughts on the nation's future.

He discussed the importance of unity and national cohesion, the dangers of political parties and factionalism, the importance of civic virtue and morality, and the role of the country in international affairs.

Read more on George Washington here: https://brainly.com/question/815647

#SPJ1

Despite the fact that thousands of things became scarce during the war, only those that were absolutely necessary for the endeavour were rationed.

Rationing laws applied to essential items like sugar, tires, fuel, meat, coffee, butter, canned foods, and shoes.

Oil, butter, sugar, and canned milk were among the items that had to be rationed because they needed to be used for the war effort. Trade was hampered by war, which reduced the supply of several items.

In times of scarcity, rationing was a way to make sure that food and other necessities were distributed fairly. After the commencement of World War II, it started with gasoline and then expanded to encompass other products including butter, sugar, and bacon. With the exception of fruit and vegetables, the rationing system eventually included the majority of goods.

To know more about World War II, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ4

Animal Farm is allegorical to Russia, and the rancher Mr. Jones is the Russian Emperor. Old Significant represents either Karl Marx or Vladimir Lenin, and the pig named Snowball addresses the scholarly progressive Leon Trotsky. Napoleon represents Stalin, while the canines are his mystery police.

Napoleon depends on the Soviet despot, Joseph Stalin. Stalin was engaged in the Russian Transformation of 1917 and came to govern Soviet Russia after the demise of Vladimir Lenin in 1924. He administered until his demise in 1953.

In his short original Animal Ranch (1945), English creator George Orwell (1903-50) allegorizes the Russian Upheaval of 1917, when the tsarist absolutism was pushed out and the Marxists came into power and the unrest's gradual disloyalty of its allies under despot Joseph Stalin (1879-1953).

Learn more about Animal Farm

https://brainly.com/question/30193503

#SPJ4