which freedom is being demonstrated in this photo?​

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

The trial of the Chicago 7, also known as the Chicago Conspiracy Trial, was a highly controversial event that took place in the aftermath of the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

From a legal perspective, the question of whether the Chicago 7 had the right to protest or should be held accountable for inciting riots depends on the interpretation of the law and the specific circumstances surrounding the events. The defendants argued that they were exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly by organizing peaceful protests against the Vietnam War and perceived injustices. They claimed that they did not directly incite violence but rather expressed their dissent through peaceful means.

On the other hand, the prosecution argued that the defendants conspired to incite violence and disrupt the convention, leading to the riots that occurred. They contended that their actions went beyond protected free speech and assembly and crossed into criminal conduct.

The trial itself was marked by political tensions, clashes between the defendants and the judge, and controversies surrounding the handling of evidence and witnesses. Eventually, the defendants were convicted of some charges, but their convictions were later overturned on appeal.

From a broader perspective, the trial and the events surrounding it sparked debates about the limits of free speech, the role of protests in a democratic society, and the balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding civil liberties. Different viewpoints exist on whether the charges and the subsequent trial were justified or if they infringed upon the defendants' rights to protest.

Ultimately, opinions on this matter may vary depending on one's perspective and interpretation of the events and legal principles involved. Some may argue that the defendants had the right to protest peacefully and that their charges were politically motivated, while others may contend that inciting riots is a legitimate concern and should be addressed through legal means.

To know more about  protest , here

https://brainly.com/question/19244187

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

-more Mesopotamian influence (in Greece)

-short fringed skirts

Answer:

Paternalism is the interference with the liberty or autonomy of another person, with the intent of promoting good or preventing harm to that person. Examples of paternalism in everyday life are laws which require seat belts, wearing helmets while riding a motorcycle, and banning certain drugs

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation: makes the most sense

Explanation:

The Long March was indeed a revolutionary withdrawal to avoid the prosecution of the Kuomintang (KMT or Chinese Progressive Party) army conducted by the Red Army of both the People's Republic of China, the mainstay of the People ’s Liberation.

Answer: Ares

Explanation:

Answer: Kratos

Explanation:cuz yea

Answer:Leapfrogging, also known as island hopping, was a military strategy employed by the Allies in the Pacific War against the Empire of Japan and the Axis powers during World War II. The key idea is to bypass heavily fortified enemy islands instead of trying to capture every island in sequence en route to a final target.

Explanation:

Answer: They hated them

Explanation:

Answer:

Either C. or A.

Explanation:

Answer:

a. Its consideration of environment impact (such as accommodation for fish) became a model for future dam projects on western rivers

Explanation:

The Columbia River project was a project of great significance for the whole region, especially for the state of Washington. This project had many positive impacts such as production of electricity, irrigation for more than half of the farmlands, development of the area, opening up new jobs. One very big problem though was the impact on the species of fish in the river. As most of them are migratory species, with the building of the dam they were stopped in their movement, thus they became restricted to the upper part of the river. Also, the water and composition of the water changed, and all of these things contributed to significant reduction of the populations of the native species of fish.

(give me brainliest or thanks if this helped you!)

Answer: What are we supposed to answer?

Explanation:

Answer: stalin was too coarse

Explanation:

Answer:

Fief

Explanation:

I know all sorts of stuff about Feudalism, cuz I'm smart!

...Never mind, I looked it up : /

Answer:

Hope this helps

Explanation:

Years ago, Edward Crab's courses in American foreign relations—and

specifically, his interest in American empire—inspired me to explore this field, and I

am grateful to have been able to study it under his guidance. His patience, good

humor, and unfailing encouragement of me in my research and my career have been

invaluable. Chandon Brown’s suggestions and enthusiasm for this study as a

contribution to American cultural history have enriched it, as have the suggestions of

James Accord, who offered repeated close readings and valuable insights into the

British empire. This study was further strengthened by the suggestions of Kinsey

Braver, who brought his expertise in American expansion during the Middle Period to

this project. Parts of this dissertation also benefited from the comments of the

members of William and Mai's dissertation discussion group and participants at the

annual meetings of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.

The staff of William and Mary’s Swed Library—especially Sheila Brown,

Don Welsh, and Alan Zollverein—have been quite helpful.

Answer: In addition to separating powers among the branches, the Framers gave each branch the power to check, or stop, the actions of the other two branches in meaningful ways. For example, the president has the power to veto, or reject, laws made by Congress.

Answer:

its b i think

Explanation:

answer the answer is a

Answer:

From what I can gather I know that her election was so important because of her slim chance she had on being reelected as "Speaker of House".

Hope this helps lol

Explanation:

Answer: Houston rejected the actions of the Texas Secession Convention, believing it had overstepped its authority in becoming a member state of the newly formed Confederacy. He refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy and was deposed from office.

Explanation: Please make me brainliest :)

Texans from the western and northern regions of the state are against secession because they had an economy that worked independently from enslaved labor. Thus, option 'A' is the correct option.

Galveston and Harrison's counties were opposed to secession by slaveholding former Whigs. Attitudes toward independence were impacted by local needs as well. Galveston's slaveholding Whigs frequently engaged in large business transactions with New York and English merchants. Their operations would be impacted by any interruption to the Union. Not everyone in Texas supported the war, as the close outcomes of the 1861 governor election demonstrated.

About 30% of Texans, according to historians, were Unionists. As time would show, many of these dissenters would suffer severe consequences as a result of their beliefs. The letter outlines a number of justifications for secession, including support for "sister slave-holding States," incapacity of the federal government to thwart Indian incursions, raids for slaves, and other border-crossing acts of banditry.

Learn more about Texans opposing secession, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15981113

#SPJ5

Answer:

Trade routes, and mines.

Explanation:

The British claimed that they owned South Africa. Initially, the British empire only wanted this particular region because they wanted to establish a direct trade routes to India.

But in mid 1800s, they found an even bigger reasons to claim this territory.

They managed to found a massive reserve of gold and diamonds in South Africa. Controlling this region contributed to their massive increase in wealth during the industrial revolution.

Answer:

Racism still exist today in our everyday lives.

When you look at someone you most likely see a normal person but not to other people. Some people look at people and watch them because of there race or color. When a white person walks into a store no one watches them they are fine. But when a black person walks into a store a police or someone will follow them down the aisles making sure they don't steal anything. Why you may ask, there is no rhyme or reason of why they do this they do it because some black people are bad people or thieves so now all of them are because of skin tone. But why not white people? Because white people are "prettier" or they "look better" but that isn't true this year alone white people have killed more people than black people but they are still the bad ones. A little suspicious right?

Explanation:

         </3 PureBeauty

Answer:  He fought back

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

With Jacksonian democracy, Andrew Jackson wanted to consolidate the populist movement that brought him to the presidency. He himself being of relatively humble origins in Appalachia, had a great motivation to do so.

The main pillar of Jacksonian democray was expanding suffrage to most European Americans over the age of 21, in order to expand political power to the common people, instead of leaving it in the hands of the elite. Jackson also wanted to strengthen the presidency at the expense of Congress, and to have the members of the judiciary democratically elected instead of being appointed by political representatives.

Jacksonain democracy was one of the most important political movements of the U.S. until the Civil War.

Answer:

because it said we the people so they thought "okay we are people we should get equality" but they did not. Sad

Explanation:

Answer:

The government allows citizens to own private businesses. The government also controls factories and other forms of production.

Explanation:

I learned this back a while ago.

Answer:

The individual income tax is Georgia's top revenue source, generating between 40 and 45 percent of the state's total revenue. The corporate income tax is a flat tax (6 percent since 1969) on the income that a corporation generates within Georgia

Answer:

The individual income tax is Georgia's top revenue source, generating between 40 and 45 percent of the state's total revenue. The corporate income tax is a flat tax (6 percent since 1969) on the income that a corporation generates within Georgia

Explanation:

i looked it up

Answer: A

Explanation: japan bombed the pearl harbor during the world war 2 therefore a they increased surveillance of Nazi sympathizers in the us

Answer:

Correct answer is an increase of Japanese Americans joining the war.

Explanation:

Only third option is correct as the attack on Pearl Harbor produced animosity towards the Japanese Americans, and as much as 120 000 of them were sent to camps across United States.

This happened after Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066.

Besides Japanese, Americans were afraid that Nazis were spread their influence.