When justices on the Supreme Court discover conflicts in the reasoning that supports their decisions, they must sometimes choose one rationale over another.
The justices may face situations where they must consider multiple legal principles, precedents, and constitutional provisions that may be in conflict with each other. In such cases, they must decide which rationale to prioritize and provide a clear and consistent legal reasoning to support their decision. The justices may also need to draft a new reason to support their decision or use both reasons to explain their position. However, ultimately, they must choose and prioritize one rationale over another to justify their decision.
To know more about conflicts click here:
brainly.com/question/28682565
#SPJ4
Which social policy mentioned in the video is usually thought of as a state and local issue, but has seen the federal government get more involved?
education
Education is the Social policy mentioned in the video is usually thought of as a state and local issue, but has seen the federal government get more involved.
The federal government's role in education has its origins in the Constitution and is, of course, closely related to other facets of American culture. In this document, education is not mentioned. The 10th Amendment declares that "the powers not specifically granted to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States respectively."
Although it might seem that the federal government cannot regulate education, the 14th Amendment requires all states to provide "equal protection of the laws to every person within their jurisdiction."
Learn more about education at:
brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ4
The vice of the groupist theory is that it conceals the most significant aspects of the system. The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent. Probably about 90 percent of the people cannot get into the pressure system.
The notion that the pressure system is automatically representative of the whole community is a myth fostered by the universalizing tendency of modern group theories. Pressure politics is a selective process ill designed to serve diffuse interests. The system is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority.
Which of the following best captures the author's argument regarding the forms of democracy?
The author's argument regarding the forms of democracy is that the pressure system is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority.
The author's argument regarding the forms of democracy is that the pressure system is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority. In this text, it can be inferred that the author of the passage is critical of the pluralist and groupist theories. The author argues that the groupist theory conceals the most significant aspects of the system while the flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent. According to the author, pressure politics is a selective process that is ill-designed to serve diffuse interests. Therefore, the notion that the pressure system is automatically representative of the whole community is a myth fostered by the universalizing tendency of modern group theories.The system is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority. The author argues that democracy is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority. Thus, the answer is that the pressure system is skewed, loaded, and unbalanced in favor of a fraction of a minority.Learn more about democracy: https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ11
T/F. In minority-dominated neighborhoods, residents are more likely to find it appropriate to call the police.
Residents are more likely to think it is proper to contact the police in areas where minority-dominated or predominate. True.
The percentage of whites (12%) and blacks (11%) who had police-initiated interaction did not differ statistically significantly. Whites (12%) were more likely than Latinos (10%) to be approached by the police. Accepting bribes from people who trade in the vices of gambling, prostitution, illegal drinking, and illicit drug usage is the most prevalent kind of police corruption.
The primary responsibility of law enforcement personnel is to assist and safeguard the public. Most law enforcement agencies are successful in doing this. Law enforcement officials, however, are seen negatively by many individuals. Citizens should know more about law enforcement and the reasons behind the measures that cops take under particular conditions.
Learn more about minority-dominated Visit: brainly.com/question/28547316
#SPJ4
true/false. find, cite and summarize an article where corporate directors or corporate officers were punnished for their bad actions with jail time, fines, or both
True. In 2020, former Nissan Motor Co. Chairman Carlos Ghosn was sentenced to more than four years in prison and ordered to pay a $6.5 million fine for financial misconduct during his time leading the company.
Ghosn was accused of underreporting his compensation and misusing company funds for personal gain.
The case against Ghosn was a high-profile example of corporate leaders being held accountable for their actions, and it drew attention to the growing trend of increased enforcement of corporate governance laws around the world. The case also highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in corporate leadership, and the need for companies to have strong systems in place to detect and prevent financial misconduct.
Overall, the case against Ghosn is a powerful reminder that corporate directors and officers can face serious consequences for their actions, including jail time, fines, and damage to their reputations. This underscores the importance of strong corporate governance practices and a culture of ethical behavior throughout organizations at all levels.
To learn more about corporate directors visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14479663
#SPJ4
what does the public law regulate
Public law sees on constitutional, administrative and criminal law. Public law is the part of law that governs relations between legal persons and a government.
Also between different institutions within a state, between different branches of government and relations between persons of direct interest to society.
An illustration of a public law?The entitlement to social benefits, which are only available to natural persons and are given by administrative action of the state budget, is a prime illustration of public law. Slippage laws could say to both public and private legislation.
Does it mean in the legal context?Not private; under the control of the government; or belongs to and accessible to the public. It could be referring to a thing, an organization, or something you do.
To know more about Public Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29358001
#SPJ1
true/false. in 2003, the united states supreme court considered two different admissions policies adopted at the university of michigan and
approved affirmative action plans that took race into consideration as part of a complete examination of the applicant's background
The given statement "In 2003, the united states supreme court considered two different admissions policies adopted at the university of Michigan and approved affirmative action plans that took race into consideration as part of a complete examination of the applicant's background" is true to give minority applicants a specific number of bonus points in the application scoring system.
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that the student admissions procedure can constitutionally favor underrepresented minority groups provided that race is not the only factor taken into account. The Court upheld the use of race as an admissions factor to the Law School in two cases involving affirmative action policies at the University of Michigan, but it overturned an undergraduate admissions policy that gave minority applicants "points."
A points-based admissions policy that gave bonus points to minority applicants was declared unconstitutional in Gratz v. Bollinger because it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Learn more about Grutter v. Bollinger at:
brainly.com/question/30328493
#SPJ4
What sources does the court consider when making a decision?
When making a decision, the court considers facts and law as sources.
Judicial decisions constitute one of the most important sources of legal authority, along with legislative and regulatory enactments, in our common law system.
Terms best describe law?Canon, ordinance, precept, rule, regulation, and statute. All of these terms say to "a principle guiding conduct or process," but the word "law" implies imposition by a sovereign power and the requirement of submission on the part of all those who are subject to that authority.
How are laws different from rules?The government enacts laws that hold everyone to the same standards. In contrast to regulations, most laws have some things that do not change depending on the situation.
To know more about Law visit:
brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
Which federal law requires handicapped access to stadiums?American Liberty ActAmericans with Disabilities ActSafe Movement ActConstruction Modification Act
Answer:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is the federal law that requires handicapped access to stadiums.
Explanation:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is the federal law that requires handicapped access to stadiums. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all aspects of public life, including transportation, employment, and public accommodations such as stadiums. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that public accommodations, including stadiums, be accessible to people with disabilities and provide equal access to all patrons. This includes, among other things, providing accessible seating areas, accessible routes of travel, and accessible restroom facilities.
discuss the differences between individualizing items of evidence and associative items of evidence?
Answer:
Individualizing evidence is evidence that can be linked to a specific person or thing, such as DNA or fingerprints. Associative evidence is evidence that does not have a direct link to a specific person or thing, but can be used to make connections or draw inferences, such as a witness testimony or surveillance footage. The main difference is that individualizing evidence can provide more direct and conclusive proof of a person's involvement, while associative evidence requires more interpretation and analysis to draw conclusions.
Explanation:
What is a sanction imposed on adjudicated delinquents in order to prevent them from continuing to commit delinquent acts in the future?
The sanction imposed on adjudicated delinquents in order to prevent them from continuing to commit delinquent acts in the future is probation.
What is Probation?Probation is defined as the court-ordered conditional release of a convicted offender who, by obeying specific conditions of behavior, can avoid imprisonment. The primary objective of probation is to assist in the rehabilitation of the delinquent while also safeguarding society by enforcing court orders.
Probation allows the offender to live and work in the community while adhering to certain conditions. The conditions of probation are typically tailored to the offender's circumstances and the severity of the offense.
A probationer who violates the conditions of probation, such as by committing a new offense or failing to report to the probation officer, may have his or her probation revoked and be incarcerated. The objective of probation is to keep delinquents out of jail and to encourage them to reintegrate into society as responsible members.
Learn more about Probation here:
brainly.com/question/9567331
#SPJ11
Virtually all parties seeking Supreme Court review must petition the Court for a(n) _____, which commands the lower court to forward the trial records to the Court.
Virtually all parties seeking Supreme Court review must petition the Court for a(n) writ of certiorari , which commands the lower court to forward the trial records to the Court.
A writ of certiorari is a legal order issued by the Supreme Court to the lower court that requires the lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court.
This allows the Supreme Court to review the case and decide whether to hear it. Generally, the Supreme Court will only issue a writ of certiorari when there is a dispute between two or more parties about an issue of law or when one party is asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision.
This is because the Supreme Court only has jurisdiction over cases where there is a dispute of law. Therefore, a writ of certiorari is almost always required when a party is seeking Supreme Court review.
To know more about Supreme Court click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156#
#SPJ11
this is a document guaranteeing the appearance of a defendant in court as required. it is a pledge of money or property to be paid to the court.
Although every crime scene is unique, discuss the components of and things to be considered when conducting a scene assessment.
Please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Safety, boundaries, documentation, evidence gathering, interviews, reconstruction, cooperation, and coordination among all parties involved in the investigation are all important considerations while assessing a crime scene.
What fundamental elements make up a criminal scene?Physical evidence identification, documentation, appropriate collection, packaging, preservation, and scene reconstruction are the fundamental crime scene techniques.
What are the elements or duties involved in recording a crime scene?The three most popular ways to document a crime scene are taking notes, drawing, and taking pictures. A thorough record of the crime scene, including the acts conducted during the search there, aids the crime scene investigator in recalling events with accuracy and aids in the identification of evidence in a court of law.
To know more about crime scene visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29970413
#SPJ1
true/false. trustee representation describes an elected representative who votes the way his or her constituents would want, regardless of personal opinion
False. Trustee representation describes an elected representative who uses their own judgment and expertise to make decisions on behalf of their constituents.
This approach assumes that the representative has been elected based on their qualifications and expertise, and therefore should be trusted to make informed decisions on behalf of the people they represent. In contrast, delegate representation describes an elected representative who acts solely as a mouthpiece for their constituents, voting exactly as they are directed by their constituents. The distinction between these two approaches to representation is a matter of debate in political science and is often influenced by factors such as the nature of the constituency, the political context, and the specific issue being addressed.
To learn more about trustee representation visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29607652
#SPJ4
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
If a subsequent event occurs after the report date but prior to the release date of an audit report, resulting in management's revision of the financial statements of a non issuer, then the auditor may do any of the following, EXCEPT:
A) Maintain the original date of the report and state that the opinion is limited to the financial statements as they existed prior to the subsequent event.
B) Perform audit procedures necessary to obtain assurance about the revised financial statements.
C) Include an additional date in the audit report that is limited to the revision to the financial statements.
D) Revise the date of the audit report to reflect the necessity of additional audit procedures.
The auditor may do any of the following, EXCEPT revise the date of the audit report to reflect the necessity of additional audit procedures (option D).
An auditor is a qualified professional who reviews and validates the financial records and accounting statements of businesses or organizations to ensure that they comply with accounting principles and regulations. Auditors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of an entity's financial reports, which may include annual financial statements, tax returns, and other financial documents. They have the expertise and knowledge to evaluate and certify the reliability of an entity's financial records and disclosures, as well as to detect errors, omissions, or fraudulent activities.
Auditors play a crucial role in ensuring that businesses and organizations operate in a transparent and ethical manner and that the public can trust the financial information they provide.
Learn more about auditor at https://brainly.com/question/29785593
#SPJ11
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
what does filing a complaint with the attorney general do
Filing a complaint with the Attorney General can result in the initiation of an investigation into the alleged wrongdoing and potential legal action against the perpetrator.
The Attorney General is the highest legal officer of a jurisdiction, responsible for upholding the law and representing the public's interests in legal matters.
An Attorney General is a legal advisor to the government and its departments, as well as a legal representative of the people. The Attorney General has a wide range of responsibilities, which can differ from one jurisdiction to another.
Here are some of the common functions of an Attorney General: Defending the government against lawsuits brought against it, and bringing lawsuits against the government on behalf of the public or government entities; Overseeing and leading investigations into criminal activity, and potentially prosecuting criminal cases.
When you file a complaint with the Attorney General's office, they will typically review the complaint to determine if it falls within their jurisdiction. If it does, they may initiate an investigation into the alleged wrongdoing and potential legal action against the perpetrator.
For such more question on Attorney General:
https://brainly.com/question/21320509
#SPJ11
rights not given to the federal government are rights to the states, true or false?
The rights not given to the federal government are rights to the states is true.
The powers not given to the government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Qualifies as the government?The U.S. Constitution gives Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, in that order, the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of the Federal Government.
Is governance in a nutshell?A government is an organization or a system made up of a number of individuals who look after a nation or a state. Every government has a constitution or set of guiding principles that it adheres to in order to provide efficient government.
To know more about Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
why do you think the delegates focused on the right to vote?
The delegates focused on the right to vote because it was one of the essential aspects of establishing a representative government.
By conferring the power to vote on the people, they could select individuals who would represent their interests in the government. The right to vote allowed citizens to participate in the government, providing them with a sense of ownership in the government's decisions. It gave the people the power to elect representatives who would stand up for their interests and prevent the government from becoming too authoritarian, as the representatives would be accountable to the people who had elected them.
Apart from this, delegates also focused on the right to vote because they believed that all people, regardless of their social status, should have a say in how the government was run. In other words, the right to vote was a way of promoting equality in society. It gave a voice to the poor, the marginalized, and the disenfranchised and ensured that their interests were not ignored by the government.
To learn more about Government :
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ11
The U.S. Constitution was a unique combination of political principles. Identify the features below that describe the principles embodied in the Constitution.
-federalism
-checks and balances
-public liberty
-private liberty
The U.S. Constitution embodies federalism, checks and balances, public and private liberty. Federalism divides power between national and state governments. Checks and balances prevent abuse of power.
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. It was drafted in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and was later ratified by the original thirteen states. The Constitution outlines the structure of the federal government and sets forth the powers and limitations of its three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The Constitution also outlines the rights and freedoms of American citizens, including the Bill of Rights, which includes the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Since its adoption, the Constitution has been amended several times to address issues such as voting rights, slavery, and presidential succession. It is widely regarded as one of the most important documents in world history and has served as a model for many other constitutions around the world.
Learn more about U.S. Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/30280940
#SPJ1
What is one trait that state and federal courts have in common?
A. Both must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
B. Both divide jurisdictions and name courts the same way.
C. Both set strict guidelines all defendants must meet before trial.
D. Both are presided over by judges who serve four-year terms.
Answer: A. Both must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
Both state and federal courts must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution because the Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States. The Constitution outlines the structure of the federal government, including the judicial branch, and sets forth certain rights and protections that apply to all individuals in the country. Both state and federal courts must adhere to the principles and protections set forth in the Constitution, such as the right to due process of law and the right to a fair trial. This ensures that the legal system operates in accordance with the principles of the Constitution and protects the rights of individuals who come before the courts.
TRUE/FALSE. in the derivation of the michaelis-menten equation, the rate at which es is formed is given by which of the following?
Systems do not follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics are,An allosteric enzyme in the presence of the product of the reaction,the enzyme ATCase. Thus correct Option (b, d)
Michaelis-Menten kinetics is a broad theory that explains the velocity and overall mechanism of enzyme-catalyzed processes. It is based on the quick reversible creation of a complex between an enzyme and its substrate, which was first proposed in 1913. (the substance upon which it acts to form a product).
What can we learn from the Michaelis-Menten equation?The equation states that at extremely low concentrations, the enzyme's rate is directly proportional to the concentration of substrate; conversely, at very high concentrations, the enzyme's rate approaches a maximum quantity known as maximum velocity.
Learn more about Michaelis-Menten kinetics ,
https://brainly.com/question/30803303
#SPJ4
Full Question: Which of the following systems do not follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics?
(Select all that apply.)
a. A simple enzyme with [S] > KM.
b. An allosteric enzyme in the presence of the product of the reaction.
c. The enzyme chymotrypsin.
d. The enzyme ATCase.
suppose that the loanable funds market is in equilibrium. as a result of an increase in the government budget deficit, the
If the loanable funds market is in equilibrium and there is an increase in the government budget deficit, this would likely lead to an increase in the demand for loanable funds.
The government would need to borrow more money in order to finance the deficit, which would increase the demand for loans and push up interest rates.
As interest rates rise, this would discourage private investment and consumption, as borrowing becomes more expensive. In turn, this could lead to a decrease in the supply of loanable funds, as individuals and businesses reduce their savings and investment in response to higher interest rates.
Overall, the impact of an increase in the government budget deficit on the loanable funds market would depend on a variety of factors, including the size of the deficit, the state of the economy, and the policy responses of the government and the central bank.
To know more about funds click here:
brainly.com/question/15444609
#SPJ4
which of the following committees of the house of representatives sets the conditions for debate and amendment of most legislation?
Rules committees of the house of representatives sets the conditions for debate and amendment of most legislation. The correct option is 3.
Before being debated on the floor in the House, most bills first go to the Rules committee. The committee decides on the rules that will control how the House will consider the bill. A "closed rule" prohibits the introduction of amendments and places strict time restrictions on debate.
The United States House of Representatives has a committee known as the Rules Committee, or simply the Rules Committee. In contrast to other committees, which frequently focus on a single area of policy, it is in charge of the procedures under which bills will be submitted to the House of Representatives. Due to its influence over the introduction and passage of legislation through the House, the committee is frequently regarded as one of the most powerful committees. As a result, it has earned the moniker "traffic cop of Congress." The correct option is 3.
The question is incomplete, complete question "Which of the following committees of the House of Representatives sets the conditions for debate and amendment of most legislation?
JudiciaryWays and MeansRulesAppropriationsGovernment Operations"Learn more about house of representatives at:
brainly.com/question/1176086
#SPJ4
question which of the following accurately compares the formal and informal powers of the president?
Holding the position of chief military commander. The president's formal and informal powers are contrasted in a suitable way by signing executive agreements with foreign countries. So the right answer is: Formal Power: Serving as military commander in chief; Informal Power: Executing executive agreements with foreign governments.
The correct option is C.
What authority does the president have both formally and informally?The President has the following formal and unofficial powers:
Formal authority:
Being in charge of an army, navy, or air force of the US.the power to veto legislation to influence Congress.the capacity to coordinate political events and conduct negotiations with foreign nations.the authority to call and adjourn sessions of Congress.Informal power:
Having the authority to enact legislative goals and executive orders.Without declaring war, dispatch troops.In charge of foreign policy projects.The correct option is C.The question is incomplete, complete question "Which of the following accurately compares the formal and informal powers of the president?
A. Formal Power: Vetoing legislation to prevent a bill from becoming law
Informal Power: Using a pocket veto to prevent a bill from becoming law
B. Formal Power: Using the bully pulpit to influence public opinion
Informal Power: Appointing ambassadors and receiving diplomats from other nations
C. Formal Power: Acting as commander in chief of the military
Informal Power: Signing executive agreements with foreign nations
D. Formal Power: Using the power of the purse to support government programs
Informal Power: Using signing statements to shape legislation
C. Formal Power: Acting as commander in chief of the military
Informal Power: Signing executive agreements with foreign nations"
Learn more about president at:
brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ4
Although white-collar crime does not involve physical violence, there are still significant ______ and ______ costs that result from such conduct.Multiple choice question.potential; socialfinancial; socialsocial; classificationclassification; financial
Although white-collar crime does not involve physical violence, there are still significant financial and social costs that result from such conduct. The correct answer is b financial; social.
White-collar crime is a term used to describe a range of non-violent crimes that are typically committed by professionals or people in powerful positions. It involves financially motivated illegal activities that are conducted by individuals who hold legitimate positions in society.White-collar crimes are generally perpetrated for the purpose of monetary gain, and they frequently rely on some form of deception. It is noteworthy that these crimes have both financial and social costs. White-collar criminals, on the other hand, can potentially pay high costs in terms of their social status, reputation, and livelihood. Some white-collar crimes include embezzlement, tax evasion, securities fraud, insider trading, and money laundering. The correct answer is b financial; social.Learn more about white-collar crime: https://brainly.com/question/1573032
#SPJ11
______: When people use illegitimate means to gain success, in particular professional and organized criminality, including drug trafficking.
Innovation : When people use illegitimate means to gain success, in particular professional and organized criminality, including drug trafficking.
Those who pursue illegal activity while holding onto their dream of success, such as those who engage in illegal drug dealing to make money, are pursuing the "American Dream" in this way. Dr. Melton also made the argument that some people leave society and end up as drug addicts or drifters after realizing they cannot achieve the "American Dream," which can result in abnormal behavior.
Innovation: The acceptance of cultural goals by an individual or group but rejection of the accepted, established methods for achieving those goals. Families involved in organized crime are one example. They adhere to the "American Dream," but they go beyond the law to achieve their objectives.
Learn more about organized crime at:
brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ4
which countries received weapons from the u.s. under the lend-lease act.
Under the Lend-Lease Act, the United States provided military aid, including weapons and equipment, to various countries during World War II.
Some of the countries that received weapons from the U.S. under the lend-lease act are as follows: United Kingdom: The United Kingdom was the largest beneficiary of U.S. military aid, receiving over $31 billion worth of lend-lease supplies, including aircraft, tanks, ammunition, and other equipment.
Soviet Union: The Soviet Union received over $11 billion in lend-lease aid, including trucks, jeeps, aircraft, and tanks. This aid was critical in helping the Soviet Union defeat the Germans on the Eastern Front. China: China received over $1.5 billion in lend-lease aid, including aircraft, trucks, and ammunition. This aid was crucial in the Chinese resistance against the Japanese during World War II.
France: France received lend-lease aid totaling over $3 billion, including aircraft, tanks, and trucks. The aid helped to support French forces fighting in North Africa and the Mediterranean, as well as the French resistance movement.
Norway: Norway received lend-lease aid totaling over $300 million, including aircraft, tanks, and other equipment. This aid was critical in the Norwegian resistance movement against the Germans during World War II.
To learn more about Lend-Lease Act :
https://brainly.com/question/30392276
#SPJ11
The government imposes a sales tax on hot dogs. The tax would be paid entirely by hot dog sellers if theA.supply is perfectly elastic.
The government imposes a sales tax on hot dogs. The tax would be paid entirely by hot dog sellers if the supply is perfectly elastic. This statement is correct, let us learn about the factors affecting the demand and supply.
Supply is defined as the total amount of a product or service that is available for a specific price, while demand is defined as the willingness and ability of consumers to purchase a product or service at a specific price. According to the law of demand, the quantity of a product or service demanded by consumers decreases as the price of the product or service rises. On the other hand, according to the law of supply, the quantity of a product or service supplied by producers increases as the price of the product or service increases. The demand and supply of a product or service can be influenced by various factors, including taxes, subsidies, input costs, technological advancements, and consumer preferences.
The imposition of a sales tax on hot dogs would raise the cost of production and supply for hot dog sellers, and the effect would be that sellers would shift the burden of the tax onto the consumers by raising the price of the hot dogs. As a result of the price increase, demand for hot dogs will decrease as consumers would look for substitute products. In case the supply of hot dogs is perfectly elastic, then the sellers will be forced to absorb the entire cost of the tax because any increase in the price would lead to a complete loss of sales. Thus, the tax would be paid entirely by the hot dog sellers in such a situation.
To learn more about Government :
https://brainly.com/question/30775846
#SPJ11