Answer:
States may give up their sovereignty in order to join international organizations or to form alliances with other countries. For example, the United States, Mexico, and Canada are part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This agreement allows for the free flow of goods, services, and capital between the three countries while also allowing them to maintain their respective sovereignty.
Sovereignty is considered to be a country’s fundamental principle. It implies that governments gain authority over what happens within their borders and create the rule that they cannot intervene in the domestic affairs of other countries. When a country declares itself sovereign, it gains the authority to create its own laws, political infrastructure, educational and healthcare systems, and religious and social norms.
In principle, sovereignty provides countries with a level playing field, preventing them from being invaded or dominated by larger, more powerful governments.
Less intuitively, governments deliberately give up their sovereignty. When nations participate in international treaties and join international organizations, they agree to give up their authority to make their own rules in exchange for the benefits of international collaboration. Countries are not necessarily the final decision-makers in international regulatory institutions. They have agreed that international laws on commerce, the use of force, weapons control, and human rights will govern (or at least guide) their behavior in certain situations.
A huge example of existing sovereignty is the European Union (EU). Attempts at international cooperation had previously failed, including after World War I. However, Europe, the birthplace of both world wars, advanced the concept of international collaboration. Countries opted to consolidate their sovereignty within a regional organization with supranational elements. A European project was launched immediately after World War II with the purpose of securing peace in the area, particularly between France and Germany, whose antagonism was essential to both world wars.
The French statesman Jean Monnet, often regarded as the architect of European integration, thought that his method of fostering European interdependence was the best way to rebuild the continent. Rather than supporting French or German interests, he called for a European agenda that would allow the region to finally move beyond the violent rivalries that had caused so much misery. His basic idea was to integrate Germany's and France's economies so that conflict between them became unthinkable. A supranational authority, in his conception, would draft legislation for the benefit of all European countries.
After many reforms in the principles of this sovereignty, the EU today has 27 countries, with each member enjoying economic, political, and security benefits. But these benefits come with a risk. For instance, the nineteen member countries that use the euro are subject to the same monetary laws. However, such tight economic integration does not imply that those nineteen national governments have the same political interests, and creating regulations that work effectively for all economies has proven challenging. It is also an unavoidable fact that certain countries will always be more powerful than others, but sovereignty is meant to level the playing field. It forbids powerful nations from altering the borders of their weak neighbors or interfering in their domestic politics and laws.
Brexit was the United Kingdom's (UK) departure from the European Union. The United Kingdom is the only sovereign country that has left the EU or the EC. The United Kingdom has previously been a member of the EU or its precursor, the European Communities (EC). Following Brexit, EU law and the Court of Justice of the European Union no longer take precedence over British law, with the exception of Northern Ireland.
Among the many influences on the UK's decision to give up membership in the EU were sovereignty, immigration, the economy, and anti-establishment politics.
To learn more about sovereignty:
https://brainly.com/question/1496479
18. To win lawsuits against people who have published false and harmful information about them, government
officials must prove
a. prior restraint.
b. slander.
c. libel.
d. malice.
A public official or limited public figure must demonstrate that the defendant published false information about the plaintiff with actual malice. The answer is option (d).
What is actual malice in defamation?In accordance with the Supreme Court, in order to be eligible for libel damages, public officials must show that a statement was issued with actual malice, which is described as "with knowing that it was inaccurate or with callous indifference of whether it false or not." Officials and public personalities must exhibit genuine malice
Plaintiffs must show either knew his declaration was untrue or subjectively harbored severe doubts about its veracity in order to establish genuine malice. The issue is not whether or not a man of ordinary caution would have published or conducted research before publishing.
To know more about actual malice, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30328085
#SPJ1
How many inches of rain does most of the Amazon rain forest receive per year?
8. The most famous and beloved president has been rushed to the hospital, grievously wounded by an assassin's bullet. He needs an immediate kidney and heart transplant to survive. No suitable donors are available, but there is a homeless person in the emergency room that is being kept alive on a respirator, who probably has only a few days to live, and who is a perfect donor. Without the transplant, the president will die; the homeless person will die in a few days anyway. Security at the hospital is very well controlled. The transplant team could accelerate the death of the homeless person and carry out the transplant without the public ever knowing that they killed the homeless person for his organs. Judge the action of the transplant team from the angle of ultilatranism, deontology, virtue and right approach.
The situation raises complex ethical dilemmas and there may not be a clear-cut answer that aligns with all ethical perspectives.
Analyzing the situationFrom the angle of Utilitarianism, the action of the transplant team could be justified if it results in the greatest good for the greatest number of people, i.e. saving the life of the beloved president would bring happiness and benefits to many people, whereas the death of the homeless person, who was going to die soon anyway, would have a minimal impact.
From the angle of Deontology, the action of the transplant team would be considered unethical because it involves intentionally causing harm to an innocent person, which goes against the moral principle of respecting the inherent worth and dignity of all human beings.
From the angle of Virtue Ethics, based on whether it aligns with the virtues of compaAccelerating the death of the homeless person and using their organs without their consent could be seen as a lack of compassion and fairness, and may also involve dishonesty in hiding the truth of what happened.
From the angle of the Right Approach, the action of the transplant team could be considered problematic because it involves violating the rights of the homeless person to life and bodily autonomy, and potentially disregards the principle of informed consent.
Learn more on ethics here https://brainly.com/question/24606527
#SPJ1
what are some advantages to joining a political party
We once thought that the crisis facing the United States was simply a capitalist economic crisis. However, it now seems that social inequality and reduced class mobility under oligarchy are social crises that are more far-reaching than economic crises, weakening national governance capacity internally and draining national soft power externally.
Answer:
L
Explanation:
+ ratio
Different ways Woodson said negros were miseducated
1. By teaching them that their African heritage was not as important as European heritage.
2. By neglecting to provide them with an education that would enable them to become successful in the world.
3. By limiting their access to higher education.
What is Woodson on negros?4. By providing them with an inferior education that was not designed to equip them with the skills to compete in a global economy.
5. By failing to provide them with the tools to achieve success in their communities and beyond.
6. By perpetuating stereotypes that kept them from achieving their full potential.
7. By not teaching them their history or the history of other cultures.
8. By not providing them with the support they need to succeed in their academic pursuits.
9. By limiting their access to resources such as books, technology, and other materials necessary to succeed.
Read more about education
https://brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ1
two types of excuse defenses generally accepted under criminal law -- they include age as a defense, and insanity. Of the two, the insanity defense has become the most controversial excuse defense strategy. Currently, five states (i.e., Idaho, Utah, Montana, Kansas, and Alaska) prohibit the use of insanity as a defense while the others have either adopted a “guilty but mentally ill” verdict, or increased the burden of proof requirement to “clear and convincing evidence” of insanity. Additionally, among insanity-defense states, in order to prove insanity four different tests have been variously accepted (i.e., M’Naghten Rule, the Irresistible Impulse Test, Durham Rule, and the Substantial Capacity Rule). Drawing on what you know and have learned about the insanity defense, do you think more states should ban insanity defenses, or should non-insanity defense states incorporate the insanity defense into their criminal law? Be sure to explain why and be prepared to defend your position.
The insanity defense resembles a confession and avoidance strategy because the accused admits to the offence while maintaining his or her innocence due to insanity.
What do you mean by insanity defense?The mental disorder defense, commonly referred to as the insanity defence, is an affirmative defence by excuse in a criminal case that contends the defendant is not accountable for their actions because they were suffering from an episodic psychiatric illness at the time of the illegal act.
The defense of insanity rests on the premise that the accused was incapable of comprehending his actions or was unaware that they were unlawful.
The insanity defence is not recognised in Kansas, Montana, Idaho, or Utah, among four other states. The requirements for establishing this defense differ greatly in various states.
Therefore, that distinction for those with a mental illness is made by the insanity defense. The insanity defense resembles a confession and avoidance strategy because the accused admits to the offence while maintaining his or her innocence due to insanity.
To know more about the insanity defense, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28249990
#SPJ1
Who led the Peloponnesian League
Answer:
Sparta
Explanation:
this is what i found.
They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors. Peloponnesian League, also called Spartan Alliance, military coalition of Greek city-states led by Sparta, formed in the 6th century bc.
HELP PLEASE!!! QUICKLY!!!!!
Decide on two compromises that could be made and write them below. This will be your compromise bill. After, explain which chamber will support your
compromise the most. Would they both agree?
Of the two statements above, the first statement is effective for overcoming OPIOID addiction. The U.S. House passed 10 bills designed to fight opioid addiction. They are part of a package of 18 bills expected to be approved.
Opioids can cause side effects such as drowsiness, clouded consciousness, nausea, and constipation. They can also cause breathing to slow down, which can lead to overdose death. If someone has signs of an opioid overdose, immediately contact the nearest health facility, the symptoms that can appear include:
The person's face is very pale and/or clammy to the touchTheir bodies limpTheir fingernails or lips are purple or blueThey start vomiting or making gurgling soundsThey can't be awakened or can't talkTheir breathing or heart rate slows or stopsDue to their pharmacological effects, opioids can cause difficulty breathing, and an overdose of opioids can cause death.
The management of opioid use disorder or opioid abuse depends on the patient's condition. In patients with intoxication, emergency management is the focus of therapy. In patients with opioid dependence, replacement therapy is given to be able to stop using opioids without causing withdrawal symptoms. Patients with withdrawal symptoms are given symptomatic management to reduce symptoms
Learn more about How to detect opioid addiction here
brainly.com/question/20067725
#SPJ1
Please answer A B C D
because of the recent World War and a world-wide depression
Why did people of some European countries decide?Dictators were able to rise to power easily during the 1930s because of the recent World War and a world-wide depression. Many people were seeking economic stability, a surplus of food, a strong leader to help them, and some national pride. This is just what dictators like Hitler, Stalin, and Tojo offered.
Dictators like as Hitler and Mussolini rose to power in Europe during the 1930s by exploiting people’s misery and fury, telling them that they would improve their circumstances when, in fact, the reverse was true. 11c The economic upheavals caused by World War I created unstable political conditions. The global downturn of the 1930s created possibilities for dictators to ascend in the Soviet Union, Germany, Italy, and Japan.
To learn more about power in Europe to refer:
https://brainly.com/question/3186975
#SPJ1
Under the leadership of Saul, the Israelites lost
many battles to the Philistines?
The statement that Under the leadership of Saul, the Israelites lost many battles to the Philistines, is False.
Why did Saul often beat the Philistines ?There may have been a variety of factors that contributed to the success of Saul against the Philistines, including strategic military tactics, access to superior weapons or resources, or perhaps a more motivated or disciplined fighting force.
However, the greatest reason was that Saul was chosen by God and so God was on the side of the Israelites. Saul also had David under his command and David was much loved by God who allowed him to beat the Philistines often.
Find out more on the Philistines at https://brainly.com/question/28705871
#SPJ1
What may have been the main
reason for Hammurabi for
creating written laws?
A. To provide stability
B. To punish everyone
C. To keep power only with the wealthy
D. To give slaves equal rights
Hammurabi ruled Babylon and established the regulations that protected its citizens. Prior to the rules, each case was evaluated separately and in a disorganized fashion. Hence, the correct answer is (D) To give slaves equal rights.
What is Hammurabi most famous for?The ancient Babylonian monarch Hammurabi is primarily renowned for the Code of Hammurabi, which was engraved on human-sized stone pillars that he put throughout the towns of his dominion more than 3,800 years after he assumed control.
The Code of Hammurabi, which he claimed to have received from Shamash, the Babylonian deity of justice, is well known. Unlike previous Sumerian legal books, such as the Code of Ur-Nammu, which concentrated on compensating the victim of the crime, the Law of Hammurabi was one of the first to emphasize corporal punishment of the culprit. It established the presumption of innocence as one of the first regulations to impose particular punishments for each offense.
To learn more about Hammurabi, click
https://brainly.com/question/11688861
#SPJ1
Chapter three discusses two types of excuse defenses generally accepted under criminal law -- they include age as a defense, and insanity. Of the two, the insanity defense has become the most controversial excuse defense strategy. Currently, five states (i.e., Idaho, Utah, Montana, Kansas, and Alaska) prohibit the use of insanity as a defense while the others have either adopted a “guilty but mentally ill” verdict, or increased the burden of proof requirement to “clear and convincing evidence” of insanity. Additionally, among insanity-defense states, in order to prove insanity four different tests have been variously accepted (i.e., M’Naghten Rule, the Irresistible Impulse Test, Durham Rule, and the Substantial Capacity Rule). Drawing on what you know and have learned about the insanity defense, do you think more states should ban insanity defenses, or should non-insanity defense states incorporate the insanity defense into their criminal law? Be sure to explain why and be prepared to defend your position.
The reader may argue that the insanity defense should be outlawed because it does not erase the fact that a crime has taken place.
What can a jury do with a defendant who is demonstrably insane?Create appropriate punishments for the level of insanity.Provide psychological assistance during the sentence.People with serious psychological problems can indeed be encouraged to commit offenses because of their illness. However, the disease does not make the offense stop happening, especially when the offense corresponds to a very serious crime.
The defense of insanity prevents the criminal from being punished for his actions, in addition to leaving a loophole for non-insane people to escape conviction. In this case, it is important that insane people are punished judicially, but that the punishment takes into account their mental problems.
Learn more about insanity:
https://brainly.com/question/28249990
#SPJ1
Chapter three discusses two types of excuse defenses generally accepted under criminal law -- they include age as a defense, and insanity. Of the two, the insanity defense has become the most controversial excuse defense strategy. Currently, five states (i.e., Idaho, Utah, Montana, Kansas, and Alaska) prohibit the use of insanity as a defense while the others have either adopted a “guilty but mentally ill” verdict, or increased the burden of proof requirement to “clear and convincing evidence” of insanity. Additionally, among insanity-defense states, in order to prove insanity four different tests have been variously accepted (i.e., M’Naghten Rule, the Irresistible Impulse Test, Durham Rule, and the Substantial Capacity Rule). Drawing on what you know and have learned about the insanity defense, do you think more states should ban insanity defenses, or should non-insanity defense states incorporate the insanity defense into their criminal law? Be sure to explain why and be prepared to defend your position.
The reader may argue that the insanity defense should be outlawed because it does not erase the fact that a crime has taken place.
What can a jury do in the case of an obviously mad defendant?Establish just sanctions for the level of lunacy.While saying the sentence, offer mental support.It is possible for people with severe psychiatric disorders to be encouraged to commit crimes as a result of their condition. Even though the offense is a highly serious criminal, the sickness does not prevent the offense from occurring.
The claim of insanity not only shields the offender from punishment for his acts but also provides a way for those who are not insane to avoid going to jail. In this situation, it's crucial that mad people receive a just penalty that also considers their mental health issues.
Learn more about insanity:
brainly.com/question/28249990
#SPJ1
Which of the following would NOT have been destroyed during the cultural Revolution?
The Cultural Revolution in China, which lasted from 1966 to 1976, had a significant impact on the country's culture, history, and society. During this time, many cultural and historical relics, works of art, and historical buildings were destroyed or severely damaged.
It is difficult to determine what specifically would not have been destroyed, as the extent of the damage was widespread. However, some items and structures that may have been spared from destruction could include:
Objects that were hidden or protected by individuals who sought to preserve them.Buildings or structures that were deemed of significant value by the government and were protected for their strategic or architectural importance.It's important to note that the damage caused by the Cultural Revolution was extensive, and much of China's cultural heritage was lost or severely damaged during this time.
Learn more about The Cultural Revolution in China here:
https://brainly.com/question/9952607
#SPJ1
For the following argument, reconstruct it in standard form and indicate how the premises support the conclusion(s). Take care to include any implicit premises. If they stop them from scoring more than 10 points, they'll win the game. If they win the game, they'll be heroes forever. They haven't let any team score more than 10 points before, so they should stop them from scoring more than 10 points. So, they'll be heroes forever.
Note that the above-given argument is reconstructed as follows:
Standard form
Premise 1: If they stop them from scoring more than 10 points, they'll win the game.Premise 2: If they win the game, they'll be heroes forever.Premise 3: They haven't let any team score more than 10 points before.Conclusion: They should stop them from scoring more than 10 points.Conclusion: So, they'll be heroes forever.Premises 1 and 2 support the first conclusion, and premise 3 supports both conclusions.
What is an Argument?An argument is a statement or set of claims known as premises that are meant to assess the degree of truth or acceptability of another statement known as a conclusion.
Arguments may be analyzed from three different perspectives: logical, dialectical, and rhetorical.
Learn mroe about Arguments:
https://brainly.com/question/15147636
#SPJ1
Please answer A B C D
US respond to the outbreak of world war II dengan cara it quickly declared war and sent an army to the Mediterranean.
In December 1941, Japan joined the Axis, attacked the United States and European territories in the Pacific Ocean, and quickly controlled most of the Western Pacific. The Axis advances stopped in 1942, after Japan lost numerous naval battles and European Axis armies were defeated in North Africa and Stalingrad. In 1943, through a series of defeats by Germany in Eastern Europe, the Allies to Italy, and United States victories in the Pacific, the Axis lost their initiative and retreated strategically on all fronts.
In 1944, the Western Allies controlled France, while the Soviet Union reconquered all of its annexed territory and controlled Germany and its allies. The war in Europe ended with the occupation of Berlin by Soviet and Polish troops and Germany's unconditional surrender on May 8, 1945. Throughout 1944 and 1945, the United States defeated the Japanese Navy and occupied several islands in the Western Pacific, dropping atomic bombs on the country in the run-up to the invasion. to the Japanese Islands.
Learn more about World War II here
brainly.com/question/8605481
#SPJ1
Please answer A B C D
The difference in views of national government between Father Coughlin and Franklin Roosevelt was D. Coughlin believed government should do more for big business than Roosevelt did.
Where did Father Coughlin differ from Roosevelt ?Father Charles E. Coughlin and President Franklin D. Roosevelt had different views on the role of the national government during the Great Depression. Coughlin was a Roman Catholic priest and radio personality who had a large following and was known for his conservative views. He believed that the government should not interfere in the economy and that the best way to solve the problems of the Great Depression was to return to a traditional, free-market system.
On the other hand, Roosevelt was a progressive and believed in an activist government. He felt that the government should play a larger role in helping to alleviate the economic and social problems of the Great Depression.
Find out more on Father Coughlin at https://brainly.com/question/9064771
#SPJ1
What are the advantages and disadvantages (potential issues and concerns) of public versus private policing?
Is the future of policing in America public or private? Explain your position.
The advantages and disadvantages of public versus private policing are a police officer serves and is tasked with representing the district, or city, a private security guard has the responsibility of representing the owner.
What is private policing?The act of contracting out standard police functions to the private sector is referred to as private policing. Their goals include addressing a larger range of criminal behavior, raising security officer morale, and expanding career prospects.
Government agencies use public policing to safeguard the general populace's welfare. The institutional and legal control frameworks that regulate public police forces also apply to alternative forms of policing.
Learn more about Private Policing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12505716
#SPJ1
* Required
How was the gerrymandering of congressional districts used by the conservative *
elite in South Carolina following Reconstruction?
The gerrymandering of congressional districts used by conservative elite in South Carolina following Reconstruction is to limit political influence of African Americans in South Carolina.
What is Gerrymandering and its use?Gerrymandering is the practice of delineating district boundaries to align them with specific political interests within the legislature, often resulting in constituencies with complex, tortuous boundaries rather than compact areas. Gerrymandering can be used in other voting systems as well, but it has the greatest impact on voting results in the first past posting system. The partisan redrawing of district lines undermines democratic principles, especially in a two-party majority system.
Why is gerrymandering bad?Gerrymandering means dragging congressional districts to benefit the party that controls state legislatures. This is a tactic that fails to give minority groups equal representation in Congress.
To learn more about gerrymandering congressional districts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30093578
#SPJ1
Please answer A B C D
The United States decide to put an oil embargo in place against Japan, so it was responding to Japan attacking Pearl Harbor, hence option B is correct.
Why US impose an oil embargo on Japan?Due to the Japanese's belligerent behavior in the water. When the Japanese attacked the naval base in Hawaii's Pearl Harbor.
Which housed the Pacific fleet, there was a rise in national unity around the administration, the United States officially enters the war on December 7.
Therefore, the American government has a careless attitude toward Japanese expansion. Roosevelt makes every effort to obstruct the expansion of his military and economy.
Learn more about Japan, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13846413
#SPJ1
What is a common food on the Marshallese Islands?
Answer:
Answer Below ↓
Explanation:
Fish, seafood and rice (although rice is an import) are the staples, along with anything made from coconut, breadfruit, pandan fruit and leaves, taro, papaya, arrowroot, yams and pumpkins. These are the most authentic ingredients in their island culture.
12. The 13th amendment ended _____. The 14th amendment increased the # of _____ in the United States and the 15th increased the # of _____.
The 13th amendment ended slavery. The 14th amendment increased the # of rights in the United States and the 15th amendment increased the # of eligible voters?
In the late 1800s, Black Codes prevented Black Americans in southern states
from:
• A. using any public transportation.
• B. operating their own businesses.
O C. leaving the South for any reason.
• D. obtaining an education.
Answer: B. Operating their own buissness
Explanation:
What is the required reserve ratio (RRR)?
the ratio of commercial to personal loans that a bank makes
the portion of a deposit that a bank must keep on hand
the amount of money a bank has to loan out
the deposits that commercial companies make in banks
The portion of a deposit that a bank must keep on hand is the required reserve ratio. Hence, option B is correct.
What is the required reserve ratio RRR?The amount of money that a commercial bank must keep in reserve to the amount of money it has on deposit is known as the mandated reserve ratio. The necessary bank reserves are held in reserve; lending or investment activities are not permitted to spend this money.
The percentage of client deposits and other liquid assets that commercial banks are required to hold, either within their own institution or with the central bank, is known as the "reserve requirement ratio" (RRR) or "cash reserve ratio" (CRR).
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about reserve ratio RRR, click here
https://brainly.com/question/15231878
#SPJ1
define the term social change and state TWO social changes you may encounter as a student
Answer:
Answer Below ↓
Explanation:
Social changes are differences that may appear in environments or interactions that you have with others. One social change that someone may encounter as an employee is a job promotion. A social change you may have as a student is a grade change.
identify an example of an administrative action that was found to have violated the equal protection clause.
An example of an administrative action that was found to have violated the Equal Protection Clause is the case of "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke" (1978).
What is an equal protection violation?Even though the Equal Protection Clause still places racial discrimination and race at its core, the Constitution can be broken by any unfair government classification that singles out one group over another.
What is an illustration of an Equal Protection Clause violation?A violation would arise, for instance, if a state forbade someone from signing an employment contract because they belonged to a specific race. The clause simply seeks to ensure equal application of the law, not equality between people or classes.
To know more about Equal Protection Clause, visit:
brainly.com/question/25079139
#SPJ1
How does where a person lives affect how a person lives?
Answer:Thanks
Explanation:T
For ofcourse the correction yeah!
5. How did Alex Manly's editorial fuel the Democrats' campaign of propaganda and white supremacy?
Editorial fueled the Democrats' campaign of propaganda and white supremacy by inciting anger and resentment among white supremacists, who saw Manly's comments as a direct attack on their beliefs and values.
Alex Manly was a newspaper editor and publisher in Wilmington, North Carolina, in the late 19th century. In 1898, he published an editorial in his newspaper, the Daily Record, that criticized white supremacists and challenged the notion of white superiority.This editorial fueled the Democrats' campaign of propaganda and white supremacy by inciting anger and resentment among white supremacists, who saw Manly's comments as a direct attack on their beliefs and values.In response, they organized a violent white supremacist coup in Wilmington, known as the Wilmington massacre, which aimed to overthrow the city's elected government and establish white supremacy as the dominant force in the city.The event was a key moment in the establishment of Jim Crow laws and segregation in the South, and it has been seen as a hallmark of the era of American white supremacy and racist violence.
To know the purpose of Democrats' campaign of propoganda use the link below -
https://brainly.com/question/401804
Which sentence in this paragraph states a claim?
(1) A bedbug is a flat, reddish-brown bug about the size of a pencil eraser. (2) It hides in bedding and furniture during the day and comes out during the night to look for blood. (3) A bedbug has a special ingredient in its saliva (spit) that keeps blood from clotting while it's eating. (4) Bedbugs were not a problem in the United States until recently; during the past few years, they have become one of the most dreaded and expensive pests around
Answer:
Sentence 4
Explanation:
A claim is a statement that a writer has to prove or show. It's also a statement that people might disagree with. It's not a statement of fact or a suggestion.
I hope this helps!