The correct punctuation for "In 2016," said Mrs. Nyoni, "Peter wrote his examination." would be as follows:
"In 2016," said Mrs. Nyoni, "Peter wrote his examination."
The use of quotation marks helps to distinguish the direct speech of Mrs. Nyoni. The comma after "In 2016" sets off the introductory phrase, indicating when the statement was made. The comma before and after "said Mrs. Nyoni" separates the attribution from the actual dialogue. The comma within the second set of quotation marks is used to indicate the beginning and end of the reported speech. Overall, this punctuation ensures clarity and proper structure when attributing and presenting the dialogue spoken by Mrs. Nyoni.
To learn more about punctuation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30789620
#SPJ4
How does the creature feel about the Sorrows of Werter? In what ways is he different from the characters in the book?
Read the excerpt from the text.
"But of the rebellion they said little, and of Bull Run nothing. These were such sore
subjects to him that he did not wish to speak of them except to the ear of sympathy; and
she, divining his sensitiveness, would not give him pain notwithstanding that he was an
abolitionist and a Yankee."
What tone does the phrase "divining his sensitiveness" help convey?
sentimental
O religious
O patriotic
O aggressive
The tone that the phrase "divining his sensitiveness" help convey is A. sentimental
What is the tone?The phrase "divining his sensitiveness" helps convey a sentimental tone. It suggests that the person mentioned in the passage, who is an abolitionist and a Yankee, has sensitive feelings or emotions related to the subjects of the rebellion and Bull Run.
The act of "divining" implies a level of empathy and understanding, indicating that the other person is careful not to cause him pain by discussing these topics. This sentiment of sensitivity and consideration contributes to a sentimental tone.
Learn.more about tone on
https://brainly.com/question/819739
#SPJ1
Evidence From Text
with proper citations
In the text, it says, “I don't care who her father is, her grades don't even begin to compare to Martha's. I won't lie or falsify records. Martha has a straight A plus average and you know it" That was Mr. Schmidt and he sounded very angry.” (Salinas, 1)
What is the bias in this text?
What is happening that's wrong?
Why is this important to know?
The bias in this text is favoritism towards Martha and discrimination against another student based on her father's identity.
The wrong thing happening in this text is that Mr. Schmidt is refusing to recognize the academic achievements of a student and instead giving preferential treatment to another student based on her family background.
It is important to know because bias and discrimination can lead to unfair treatment and opportunities, and can also create a negative learning environment for students. It is crucial to address and eliminate biases in education to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed and reach their full potential.
To learn more about bias in the text, here
https://brainly.com/question/4936106
#SPJ1
Question 6
Throughout the text, Johnson provides a timeline of Princess Margaret's life including significant
events regarding her relationships and those of her royal family. The acts of divorce dicussed in the
text are developed by
introducing the laws outlined by the royal family in regards to divorce and
succession to the throne.
WA
B
differentiating between the treatment of royal women who divorce versus the
treatment of royal men who choose to do the same.
C
creating a connection between the relationships of Margaret and those of her
family members to the scrutiny they face as a result of divorce.
OD
criticizing Margaret and other royal family member's inability to sustain their
marriages in light of having everything one could desire.
The correct answer is option C. Throughout the text, Johnson provides a timeline of Princess Margaret's life, highlighting significant events related to her relationships and those of her royal family.
The author develops the acts of divorce by introducing the laws outlined by the royal family, discussing the treatment of royal women versus royal men who choose to divorce, and creating a connection between Margaret's relationships and the scrutiny faced by her family members. Throughout the text, Johnson explores the theme of divorce within the royal family and its consequences. The author highlights the specific laws and guidelines imposed by the royal family in relation to divorce and succession to the throne. By discussing Margaret's relationships and drawing parallels to the experiences of her family members, Johnson demonstrates how divorce within the royal family is closely scrutinized by the public and media. The author examines the challenges and expectations faced by royal women who divorce compared to the treatment of royal men in similar circumstances. This connection emphasizes the unique pressures faced by members of the royal family when their marriages come under public scrutiny.
Learn more about scrutiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/32258469
#SPJ11
2. what awful things does juliet say she will do rather than marry paris? (she mentions 7 total things, 4 minimum for this answer)
In "Romeo and Juliet," Juliet vehemently opposes marrying Paris and passionately declares her willingness to face dreadful alternatives. She mentions at least four distressing actions she'd rather undertake:
She vows to leap off a battlement, preferring death by her own hand.
Juliet expresses her readiness to walk through plague-ridden areas, intentionally exposing herself to contagious diseases.
She threatens to endure being chained among roaring bears, enduring a brutal demise.
Juliet speaks of hiding in a tomb with the decaying bones of her ancestors, choosing death over marriage to Paris.
These declarations highlight the depth of her love for Romeo and her desperation to avoid an unwanted union, reflecting her determination and defiance against societal expectations.
Learn more about Juliet
https://brainly.com/question/1409935
#SPJ4
How does the meaning of “emphasizes” different from the meaning of “shows”
The term "emphasizes" refers to the act of giving more importance or focus to a particular aspect or idea. When something is emphasized, it is highlighted as a crucial part of the overall message or argument. On the other hand, the term "shows" simply means to demonstrate or display something. It does not necessarily imply that the particular aspect being shown is of greater importance or significance.
For example, if a speaker is delivering a presentation on climate change, they may emphasize the importance of reducing carbon emissions as a way to mitigate its effects. This means that they are giving more focus and weight to the idea of reducing carbon emissions as a key solution to the problem of climate change.
In contrast, they may also show charts and graphs to illustrate the effects of climate change, but this does not necessarily mean that they are emphasizing the significance of these charts and graphs in the same way.
In summary, while both "emphasizes" and "shows" involve highlighting or bringing attention to something, the former implies a greater importance or significance being placed on that aspect, while the latter does not necessarily have that connotation.
For more questions on: emphasizes
https://brainly.com/question/28031416
#SPJ11
GIVING AWAY ALL MY POINTS DOESNT HAVE DO BE PERFECT!!!
PROMPT: Write an essay that explains how at least two authors use the conventions of science fiction to critique society. Which author's message is most relevant to us today? You must choose from the texts we have read in this unit for your response.
HERE ARE THE STORIES: I CAN PROVIDE A PDF DOC OF IT IF YOU NEED IT
Oedipus
Unit 2
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Midsummer Act 1
Midsummer Act 2
Midsummer Act 3
Midsummer Act 4
Midsummer Act 5
Unit 3
A Doll's House
Doll's House Act 1
Doll's House Act 2
Doll's House Act 3
Unit 4
The Veldt
How Technology Lowers Emotional Intelligence In Kids
Cooking Time
The Wretched and the Beautiful
Science fiction writers often use their works to comment on modern culture. Science fiction novels such as Ray Bradbury's "The Veldt" and Nicholas Carr's "How Technology Lowers Emotional Intelligence in Kids" present social critiques of how technology affects people.
Both pieces make the case that we should be careful about our dependence and use of technology as it is believed to be negatively affecting our emotional lives and interpersonal relationships.
In "The Veldt", Ray Bradbury imagines a future in which a family's home is completely mechanized in order to investigate the dangers of technology. The house meets the needs of all its occupants, including their children, who have developed an addiction to a virtual reality nursery that projects their imaginations into the house's walls.
Learn more about "The Veldt", here:
https://brainly.com/question/15742494
#SPJ1
What is the subject and predicate in the sentence "A blind man crossing the road"
The sentence "A blind man crossing the road" doesn't have a clear subject and predicate. It is an example of a sentence fragment, which is an incomplete sentence that lacks a subject, a predicate, or both.
However, if we were to add a verb to the sentence, it could be revised to something like "A blind man is crossing the road." In this case, the subject is "a blind man" and the predicate is "is crossing the road."
the _____ arranges main points according to opposing arguments and then both challenges them and bolsters your own.
The Rogerian method arranges main points according to opposing arguments and then both challenges them and bolsters your own.
The term that describes arranging main points according to opposing arguments and then challenging them while bolstering your own is called the Rogerian method. This method involves actively listening to the opposing viewpoint and finding common ground before presenting your own argument. By acknowledging the validity of the opposing argument, the speaker can build trust and credibility with the audience.
The Rogerian method is effective in contentious debates or when dealing with sensitive topics as it promotes understanding and avoids confrontation. Ultimately, the goal of the Rogerian method is to find a mutually agreeable solution that satisfies both parties.
More on Rogerian method: https://brainly.com/question/5314203
#SPJ11
What is wrong with "disability rhetoric" and "inspiration-based language"?
The problem with "disability rhetoric" and "inspiration-based language" lies in their tendency to perpetuate stereotypes, undermine the agency and experiences of disabled individuals, and create a skewed perception of disability.
"Disability rhetoric" refers to the language and discourse surrounding disability, which often focuses on portraying disabled individuals as objects of pity or inspiration. This rhetoric can be problematic as it tends to reinforce negative stereotypes and overlook the diverse experiences and abilities of disabled individuals. It can lead to the marginalization and stigmatization of disabled people by framing disability as a tragic or heroic narrative rather than recognizing disability as a natural variation of the human experience.
Similarly, "inspiration-based language" refers to the use of language that presents disabled individuals as sources of inspiration for able-bodied individuals. While intentions may be positive, this language can diminish the agency and autonomy of disabled people by reducing them to objects of inspiration rather than recognizing their individual achievements and contributions on their own terms. It can create an imbalanced power dynamic and reinforce the notion that disabled individuals exist solely to inspire or motivate others.
In conclusion, both "disability rhetoric" and "inspiration-based language" can perpetuate stereotypes, undermine the agency and experiences of disabled individuals, and create a distorted understanding of disability. It is important to promote language and discourse that respects and values the diversity and autonomy of disabled individuals, highlighting their capabilities and contributions rather than reducing them to simplistic narratives of pity or inspiration.
Learn more about problem here:
https://brainly.com/question/976987
#SPJ11
Which of the following best describes Chomsky's view of language development?
A) Language is an entirely learned ability.
B) Language is an innate ability.
C) Humans have a biological predisposition to acquire language.
D) There are no cultural influences on the development of language.
Chomsky's view of language development is that language is an innate ability. Option B.
He believed that all humans are born with a language acquisition device (LAD) in their brains, which allows them to acquire language naturally and without conscious effort. According to Chomsky, language is not something that is entirely learned, but rather something that is hardwired into our brains from birth. He also believed that there are universal grammar rules that underlie all human languages, which are built into the LAD. However, Chomsky did not discount the influence of culture on language development entirely. He believed that while culture can shape the way language is used, the fundamental rules and structures of language are innate. Answer option B.
More on innate ability: https://brainly.com/question/28040764
#SPJ11
“Do not go gentle” by Dylan Thomas can be considered an extended metaphor. What is being compared? How is that comparison made? Give 2 examples from the text.
Answer:
In "Do not go gentle into that good night" by Dylan Thomas, the speaker compares death to darkness or night. This is an extended metaphor because the comparison is sustained throughout the entire poem.
Example 1: "Do not go gentle into that good night, / Old age should burn and rave at close of day; / Rage, rage against the dying of the light." Here, the speaker is encouraging his father to fight against death and not accept it passively, comparing death to a "good night" that he should not "go gentle into."
Example 2: "And you, my father, there on the sad height, / Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray. / Do not go gentle into that good night. / Rage, rage against the dying of the light." Here, the speaker is pleading with his father to resist death and not give in to it, comparing death to the "dying of the light."
Which rewrite of sentence 15 contributes to clarity with an appositive?
(15) "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges ("History of Central Park").
a "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges, which required a large investment ("History of Central Park").
b "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water (both streams and ponds) and thirty-six archways and bridges ("History of Central Park").
c "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water (there are now many more) and thirty-six archways and bridges ("History of Central Park").
d "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges for crossing these waters ("History of Central Park"
The rewrite of sentence 15 that contributes to clarity with an appositive is option d) "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges for crossing these waters. The option d) is correct.
An appositive is a noun or noun phrase that describes or renames another noun or noun phrase. It's commonly placed beside the noun or pronoun it refers to in a sentence. An appositive is always located right next to the noun or pronoun it refers to in a sentence.What is the meaning of the sentence?In this sentence, Greensward refers to a particular plan for the development of a park. It is referred to as "Greensward."
The sentence states that the "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges. This sentence is difficult to comprehend because it doesn't provide enough information about the archways and bridges. What is the purpose of the archways and bridges? Is it simply to span the waterways?This rewrite of sentence 15, "Greensward" called for the construction of four bodies of water and thirty-six archways and bridges for crossing these waters ("History of Central Park"), adds clarity to the sentence. The appositive "for crossing these waters" specifies the use of archways and bridges, making the sentence easier to comprehend. The correct option is (d)
To learn more about Greensward, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/21869741
#SPJ11
Match each item in column A with its defining word or phrase in column B
Match each item in "Everyday Use" column A with its defining word or phrase in column B:
Augusta - h. the state in which the author was bornDee - i. the African name Dee has takenJohn Thomas - d. the name of the sister who is visiting the sister.Maggie - e. the name of the sister who has been burnt and lives with the narratorMama - a. the name of the narrator of the storyWalker - g. the last name of the author of this short storyWangero - Dee's new African nameAlice Walker's short tale "Everyday Use" was first published in 1973. Mrs. Johnson, a huge African-American mother with two kids, Dee and Maggie, tells the narrative.
A mother and her two kids, Dee and Maggie, are the focus of the narrative. When Dee travels to see her family in Dicie, she brings her swain, Hakim-a-barber.
As a result, the significance of the "Everyday Use" are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on "Everyday Use", here:
https://brainly.com/question/16291240
#SPJ1
Quote in chapter 8 of night by elie weisel about oppression
The quote is: "Well, well, that's how it is in this world. He throws a piece of bread among you, and you kill each other." The quote describes a moment in a concentration camp during the Holocaust where a worker throws a piece of bread into a wagon, resulting in a desperate fight among starving prisoners. It symbolizes the extreme oppression and dehumanization experienced in the camps, where even a small piece of bread becomes a matter of life and death. The quote highlights the deliberate manipulation and control by those in power, exposing the inhumane conditions and the prisoners' desperate struggle for survival. It serves as a chilling reminder of the devaluation of human life and the relentless battle faced by prisoners in the concentration camp system.
In Chapter 8 of "Night" by Elie Wiesel, the following quote about oppression can be found:
"One day when we had come to a stop, a worker took a piece of bread out of his bag and threw it into a wagon. There was a stampede. Dozens of starving men fought desperately over a few crumbs. The worker watched the spectacle with great interest. 'Well, well, that's how it is in this world. "‘He throws a piece of bread among you, and you kill each other.'"
This quote illustrates the extreme oppression and dehumanization experienced by the prisoners in the concentration camps during the Holocaust. It captures the horrifying reality of their daily existence, where even a small piece of bread becomes a matter of life and death. The workers' act of throwing bread into the wagon highlights the deliberate manipulation and control exercised by those in power over the prisoners. It exposes the inhumane conditions and the desperation of the prisoners, forced to fight amongst themselves for basic sustenance. The quote serves as a powerful reminder of the degrading and oppressive nature of the concentration camp system, where human life was devalued and survival became a constant battle.
For more such information on: quote
https://brainly.com/question/30947517
#SPJ11
Rewrite the following examples of faulty parallelism using correct parallel structure:
1. The problems with the fast food restaurants include the way workers are exploited, eating transfatty acids, and that the food can damage your liver.
2. Venus Williams likes to play tennis and also designing clothes.
3. In the 1960s, the use of drugs and bring a hippie were ways for some people to let society know their political views and that they were alienated from the mainstream
1. The problems with fast food restaurants include the exploitation of workers, the consumption of transfatty acids, and the potential damage to your liver.
2. Venus Williams enjoys playing tennis and designing clothes.
3. In the 1960s, using drugs and adopting a hippie lifestyle were ways for some people to express their political views and signify their alienation from the mainstream.
In the first example, the faulty parallelism is corrected by using parallel verb phrases. The original sentence mixed a verb ("exploited") with a gerund phrase ("eating transfatty acids") and a noun clause ("that the food can damage your liver"). By revising the sentence to use parallel verb phrases, the sentence is made grammatically correct. In the second example, the faulty parallelism is corrected by using parallel verb phrases. The original sentence mixed a verb ("likes") with a gerund phrase ("designing clothes"). By revising the sentence to use parallel verb phrases ("enjoys playing" and "designing"), the parallel structure is maintained. In the third example, the faulty parallelism is corrected by using parallel noun phrases. The original sentence mixed a gerund phrase ("using drugs") with a verb phrase ("bring a hippie"). By revising the sentence to use parallel noun phrases ("using drugs" and "being a hippie"), the parallel structure is restored.
Learn more about verb here:
https://brainly.com/question/14574299
#SPJ11
Which of the following is a sentence fragment?
A.
The homeowner can buy practically anything for home improvement through the dealer.
B.
When a homeowner wants nails or doorknobs or wood.
C.
The building-supply dealer carries everything for the home workshop.
D.
The dealer can even phone a supplier for cement.
When a homeowner wants nails or doorknobs or wood is a sentence fragment. Thus, option B is correct.
Conversational fragments are common; spoken English is full with them. In fact, you may draw some odd looks if you spoke only in whole words for an entire day. However, writing fragments must be avoided according to English conventions (except in extremely rare circumstances), so you must be able to spot them in your writing and fix them.
Read a sentence out loud to start spotting fragments in your writing. Is it finished sounding? Would it sound complete to a total stranger if you approached him and said it to him? Or would he be impatiently awaiting your conclusion? Examine it even if it seems acceptable to you because you already understand what you mean.
Learn more about sentence fragments here:
https://brainly.com/question/22794143
#SPJ1
Nick wants to add the following sentence to his report. Which version of the sentence is most descriptive?
Answer:
is there more to the question? it doesn't seem fully filled out.
Why do you think Longfellow changed these specific details ?
Answer: look below me ↓
Explanation:
When authors make changes to specific details in their works, there can be various reasons behind their decisions. Here are a few possible reasons why Longfellow or any author might change specific details:
Artistic purposes: Authors may alter details to enhance the aesthetic or artistic qualities of their work. This could involve changes in language, imagery, or symbolism to create a desired effect or evoke specific emotions in the reader.
Narrative cohesion: Changes in details may be made to ensure consistency and coherence within the story or poem. This could involve modifying certain elements to maintain a logical progression, reinforce themes, or strengthen the overall structure of the work.
Historical accuracy: If the work is based on real events or historical figures, authors may alter details to align with historical accuracy or to present a more authentic representation of the time period. This can involve adjustments to dates, locations, character backgrounds, or other factual elements.
Personal interpretation: Authors often bring their own perspectives, experiences, and creative vision to their works. They may change details to reflect their personal interpretation of the subject matter or to explore specific themes and ideas that resonate with them.
Reader engagement: Sometimes authors modify details to engage the reader more effectively. This can involve crafting surprises, plot twists, or unexpected developments that maintain the reader's interest and keep them engaged with the work.
It's important to note that the specific reasons for changing details can vary greatly depending on the author, the work itself, and the desired outcome. Without knowing the specific details or the work you are referring to, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer.
You wish to make a substantial down payment on a lake cottage and you currently have $15,725 invested at an annual rate of 2.50%. How much money will be in the account in 3 years and 6 months if it continues to earn at its present rate
If the $15,725 is invested at an annual rate of 2.50%, the amount of money in the account in 3 years and 6 months would be $17,247.72.
To calculate the future value of the investment, we can use the formula for compound interest: FV = PV * (1 + r)^n, where FV is the future value, PV is the present value or initial investment, r is the interest rate per period, and n is the number of periods. In this case, the present value (PV) is $15,725, the interest rate (r) is 2.50% (or 0.025 as a decimal), and the number of periods (n) is 3 years and 6 months, which can be converted to 3.5 years.
Using the formula, we can calculate the future value (FV) as follows:
FV = $15,725 * (1 + 0.025)^3.5 = $17,247.72.
Therefore, if the investment continues to earn at its present rate, the account would have approximately $17,247.72 in 3 years and 6 months. This calculation assumes that the interest is compounded annually and that no additional deposits or withdrawals are made during the investment period.
Learn more about future value here:
https://brainly.com/question/30787954
#SPJ11
This excerpt begins in one meter and ends in another meter. What are the two meters?
Thank you for your question. Without having access to the specific excerpt you are referring to, it is difficult to accurately identify the two meters that the excerpt begins and ends in.
Meter refers to the rhythmic structure of a poem, which is determined by the number and arrangement of stressed and unstressed syllables in each line. Common meters in English poetry include iambic, trochaic, anapestic, and dactylic. Each of these meters has a distinct pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables that creates a specific rhythmic effect.
In some poems or excerpts, the meter may change from one line or stanza to the next, or even within a single line. This can create a sense of variety and movement in the poem, as well as emphasize certain words or phrases. For example, a poet might use a different meter to convey a shift in tone or mood or to highlight a particular idea or image.
In order to determine the two meters in the excerpt you are referring to, you will need to examine the rhythmic structure of each line and compare it to the patterns of stressed and unstressed syllables in each meter. This may require a close reading of the text and some familiarity with the principles of poetic meter.
Learn more about familiarity here:
https://brainly.com/question/24873316
#SPJ11
Based on the given information, it is clear that the excerpt starts in one meter and ends in another. However, without the actual excerpt to analyze, it is impossible to accurately determine what the two meters are.
In poetry, a meter refers to the rhythmic pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables in a line of verse. There are various types of meters, including iambic pentameter, trochaic tetrameter, and anapestic trimeter, among others. Each meter creates a distinct rhythm and tone in the poem, affecting the overall mood and message.
To know more about rhythmic refer :
https://brainly.com/question/837869
#SPJ11
let the timerclocksource=smclk,timermode=continuous, and timerclockdivider=32, what is the time period (in ms) between taifg flags?
The time period between TAIFG flags with the given parameters is approximately 2.048 ms.
In order to determine the time period between TAIFG flags with the given parameters, we need to use the following formula:
Time period = (timer clock source / timer clock divider) * timer count
The timer clock source is SMCLK, which is typically set to 1 MHz. The timer clock divider is 32. Finally, since the timer mode is continuous, we need to know the number of timer counts between each TAIFG flag.
Assuming that we have set the timer to its maximum value of 65535, we can calculate the time period as follows:
Time period = (1 MHz / 32) * 65535 = 2047.96875 us
To convert this value to milliseconds, we simply divide by 1000:
Time period = 2047.96875 us / 1000 = 2.04796875 ms
Therefore, the time period between TAIFG flags with the given parameters is approximately 2.048 ms.
To know more about TAIFG flags click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8650924
#SPJ11
the underlying tenet for change management is that all human beings prefer doing things that have the most meaning for themselves.
The underlying tenet for change management is based on the idea that people are more likely to embrace change when they understand how it benefits them personally.
In other words, individuals tend to prefer doing things that have the most meaning for themselves. Therefore, effective change management strategies should focus on communicating the benefits of the change to the individuals impacted by it, and providing them with the necessary support and resources to make the transition as smooth as possible. This approach helps to increase engagement, motivation, and buy-in from employees, which ultimately leads to greater success in implementing the change.
More on change management: https://brainly.com/question/11239217
#SPJ11
Do you agree that language should imbibe the essence of the country where
it is used as the second language?
Answer:
Yes, I think that the language should imbibe the essence of the country where it is used as a second language. If the language is to flourish in that country, then it should have the essence of that country, probably going under the process of toasting. Just like the Americans have adapted British english, but added their country's essence by making it informal and getting rid of the formalism. If the language is exactly the same as the other country, it cannot be distinguished.
Explanation:
Just like the Americans have adapted British english, but added their country's essence by making it informal and getting rid of the formalism. If the language is exactly the same as the other country, it cannot be distinguished.
Yes, I agree that the language should reflect the character of the nation in which it is spoken.
Thus, The language must reflect the character of the nation it is spoken in, most likely through toasting, in order for it to grow there. Similar to how Americans have adopted British English but added their own unique flavour by removing the formality and making it more casual.
It is impossible to tell one language from another if they speak exactly the same language.
Similar to how Americans have adopted British English but added their own unique flavour by removing the formality and making it more casual. It is impossible to tell one language from another if they speak exactly the same language.
Thus, Yes, I agree that the language should reflect the character of the nation in which it is spoken.
Learn more about language, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31133462
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer.
Which choice best defines citing evidence?
O A. attempting to understand the background of the author
referring to the text to support your interpretation of a text
indicating the extra sources you used to understand the text
O c.
OD. explaining the steps you took to interpret the text
Reset
Next
Answer:
referring to the text to support your interpretation of the text
What condition is Lanyon in when Utterson attempts to consult him after the murder?
Lanyon's devastating illness renders him unable to provide valuable information to Utterson, leaving Utterson to rely on his own investigation skills. However, Lanyon's involvement ultimately contributes to uncovering the truth about Jekyll and Hyde.
In the novel "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," Lanyon is in a terrible state when Utterson attempts to consult him after the murder. Lanyon is suffering from a terrible illness that has been brought on by the shock of witnessing the transformation of Hyde into Jekyll.
Lanyon is barely able to speak, and he is clearly in agony as he recounts the events that he has witnessed.Lanyon is a respected physician, but he is also a close friend of both Jekyll and Utterson. When Utterson attempts to consult him after the murder, Lanyon is unable to give him any useful information.
He is so distraught that he cannot even bring himself to speak about the events that have taken place. Utterson is left with very little information about the murder, and he is forced to rely on his own investigative skills to get to the bottom of the case. Ultimately, it is Utterson who discovers the truth about Jekyll and Hyde, but he could not have done it without the help of Lanyon.
For more such questions on investigation
https://brainly.com/question/31449385
#SPJ8
Poor Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan’s in three paragraph essay 4 to 5 sentences each write a new valuation of evidence to support which candidate promotes a more complex an argument about inflation
Both Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan made arguments about inflation during their respective presidencies. A new evaluation of evidence suggests that Ronald Reagan promoted a more complex argument about inflation compared to Jimmy Carter.
Ronald Reagan's approach to addressing inflation involved implementing a combination of fiscal and monetary policies. He advocated for reducing government spending, cutting taxes, and tightening monetary policy to control inflation. Reagan's argument recognized the complex relationship between government policies, economic growth, and inflation. By proposing a multi-faceted approach, he acknowledged that inflation is influenced by various factors and requires a comprehensive strategy to address. On the other hand, Jimmy Carter's approach to inflation focused more on managing the effects rather than implementing a comprehensive plan. While he did take measures to control inflation, such as appointing Paul Volcker as the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Carter's argument appeared less multifaceted compared to Reagan's. Carter's emphasis was more on the immediate actions to alleviate inflation's impact on the economy, without delving into the underlying causes or proposing a comprehensive long-term strategy. In conclusion, the evaluation of evidence suggests that Ronald Reagan's approach to inflation was more complex compared to Jimmy Carter's. Reagan's argument recognized the interconnectedness of various economic factors and proposed a comprehensive plan to address inflation, whereas Carter's approach was more focused on short-term measures.
Learn more about inflation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29308595
#SPJ11
Jacob's sister, who is a nurse, is likable and friendly.
Which diagram structure would best fit this sentence?
The best diagram structure for the sentence "Jacob's sister, who is a nurse, is likable and friendly" is a simple sentence diagram.
How to explain the informationA simple sentence diagram shows the basic structure of a sentence, with the subject on the left, the verb in the middle, and the object on the right. In this case, the subject is "Jacob's sister," the verb is "is," and the object is "likable and friendly." The diagram would look like this:
The phrase "who is a nurse" is a non-essential clause that provides additional information about the subject. It can be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence. The diagram would look like this if the non-essential clause were removed:
Learn.more about structures on
https://brainly.com/question/12053427
#SPJ1
The phrases "Covert in April" and "Candid in May" use alliteration well; however, they are well chosen for meaning as well. Explain why covert and candid are good descriptors of the flower
The phrases "Covert in April" and "Candid in May" use alliteration effectively to create a pleasing sound and rhythm. However, they are not just chosen for their alliterative qualities but also for their meaningful association with the flower.
The word "covert" typically refers to something hidden or concealed. In the context of the flower, it suggests that in April, the flower is still in its budding stage, not fully open or revealed. It represents the flower's initial growth and development, with its delicate beauty still hidden within the bud.On the other hand, the word "candid" means open, sincere, or frank. When applied to the flower in May, it signifies that the flower has fully bloomed, revealing its vibrant colors and delicate petals without any reservation. It captures the essence of the flower in its full glory, as it openly displays its beauty to the world.Therefore, the choice of "covert" for April and "candid" for May as descriptors of the flower goes beyond the alliterative appeal. It conveys the stages of growth and transformation, capturing the hidden potential in the bud and the open beauty of the bloomed flower.
To learn more about alliterative click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/3417646
#SPJ11
What famous person inspires you and why? Start with an opening
There are many famous people who inspire me, but if I had to choose one, it would be Oprah Winfrey. I admire her for her resilience and determination to overcome adversity and achieve success. Despite facing numerous challenges and setbacks throughout her life, she never gave up on her dreams and used her platform to empower others. Oprah has also shown a great deal of compassion and generosity by using her wealth and influence to support various charitable causes. Overall, I think she is a great role model for anyone looking to make a positive impact in the world.