He proved that qualities are reliably passed on from parents to children in dominant and recessive patterns, regardless of other traits.
Although Gregor Mendel's rules serve as the theoretical foundation for our knowledge of the genetics of heredity, genetic analysis precedes Mendel.
Mendel contributed two new ideas to the field of genetics:
created clean lines
kept statistics notes and counted his findings
The gene for tall plants was dominant in Mendel's trials, whereas the allele for short plants was recessive. Similar to this, the dominant gene for yellow seeds outweighed the recessive allele for green seeds.
Mendel's second law was developed as a consequence of his second series of experiments. The law of independent assortment is this. It claims that the determinants of certain attributes are inherited separately from one another.
The law of segregation states that each gamete (egg or sperm cell) that an organism produces receives only one of the two gene copies that are present in the organism, and that the distribution of the gene copies is random.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
Steps toward limiting tort damages in a number of states include all of the following except:
a. limiting the amount of punitive damages.
b. limiting the amount of noneconomic general damages like pain and suffering.
c. increasing the burden of proof in negligence cases.
d. banning punitive damages.
In a number of states, steps toward limiting tort damages include all of the following, with the exception of increasing the burden of proof in negligence cases. Option c is the correct response.
Except in cases of "serious injury," limited tort limits your right to sue for pain and suffering. This "limited-tort" option entitles you to a premium reduction. Full Tort: Does not restrict your ability to sue. If you chose the "full-tort" option, you are not eligible for a lower premium. Drivers are barred from pursuing additional claims under limited tort (lawsuits for pain and suffering, for instance). Unless the accident resulted in death or serious injury, recouping money for damages using limited tort coverage is difficult. Limited tort is usually less expensive than full tort.Negligence law allows you to sue someone for causing you harm by accident or recklessness. Negligence occurs when an individual's actions or inaction falls below a reasonable standard of care.
Learn more about tort here:
https://brainly.com/question/14927068
#SPJ4
What is the main point of the Supreme Court?
The main point of the Supreme Court is that, the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the law.
The Supreme Court has been thus conferred with power in order to direct transfer which can be of any civil or criminal case from the one State High Court to the another State High Court or from a Court subordinate to the another State High Court.
However, the Supreme Court is said to be an apex of the Judiciary. As, it is the final arbiter of the law and as well as the highest authority to interpret and uphold the Constitution of the country. Hence, the Supreme Court is considered to be the guardian of our Constitution.
To learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28280833
#SPJ4
What are some of the policy reasons underlying the requirement that before a person can be convicted of a crime, every member of a jury votes for conviction?
The prosecution must establish the defendant's guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. This assures that there is reasonable even if they cannot all come to an agreement. every member of a jury votes conviction.
What justifications does Juror 8 make for their initial verdict of not guilty?Juror 8 is the only one who cast a "not guilty" vote in the first round. He does this for a different purpose than whether or not he truly believes the accused is innocent. He casts his vote for not guilty because he thinks the committee ought to deliberate before making a decision in a case with such grave repercussions.
How many jurors must find the defendant guilty in order for a conviction to occur?A three-fourths vote is necessary in cases involving mandatory life sentences or prison terms of more than ten years. In every other To find someone guilty, just a two-thirds majority is needed.
To know more about jury votes conviction visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/19634487
#SPJ1
What does Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience?
Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience to a machine.
Thoreau makes a comparison between the government to a machine to explain how governments is devoid of any humane or moral values. It dehumanizes individuals.
He further elaborates his point by stating that Thoreau claims that the machines are the 'mass of men'. On the other hand "with their bodies"; they "put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones."
By using this words that correspond to parts of different machines, he explains how the government exploits the people to fulfill his means is that by serving the state.
In this way, the government no longer fulfills its functions of a welfare state and does little for the betterment.
To know more about Civil disobedience, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
How is judicial activism connected to the idea of a loose interpretation of the US Constitution?
The judicial activist philosophy interprets the Constitution to include personal opinions and prejudices about what the text of the Constitution actually means and represents, not just what is explicitly written.
For example, the Constitution says you have the right to free speech under the First Amendment. But thanks to legal action, we understand that hate speech falls outside the scope of free speech.
Judicial activism is the decision of judges to overlook precedent or previous constitutional interpretations in order to protect individual rights or the broader political agenda.
The term can be used to describe a judge's actual or perceived approach to judicial review.
To learn more about 'judicial activist', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29629831
#SPJ4
On the question of whether american laws applied to the overseas territory acquired in the spanish-american war, the supreme court ruled in the insular cases that?
On the question of whether American laws applied to the overseas territory acquired in the Spanish-American war, the Supreme Court ruled that the American Constitution and laws did not apply to the US colonies.
When the U.S. territories were acquired in the Spanish–American War, the supreme Court of the United States gave a series of opinions that came to be known as the Insular cases.
These cases were decided between 1901 and 1922. They limited the constitutional powers of the United States over certain territories acquired after the end of the Spanish American War.
The insular cases made it clear that fundamental rights were only available in those territories to US citizens, and the availability of other procedural rights will be subject to the state laws and are not universally applicable to each territory.
The insular cases gave rise to the doctrine of incorporation of territories. The Court, for the first time, marked the difference between fundamental or natural rights, which are constitutionally protected everywhere, and rights merely remedial or procedural.
To know more about the Insular cases, clack here:
https://brainly.com/question/29448064
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true of right-to-work laws?
a. They promote closed shops in organizations.
b. They restrict compulsory union membership.
c. They require that all union members have legal work permits.
d. They prohibit union meetings during work hours.
They limit compulsory union membership. THe correct answer is
option (b).
Which of the following acts is referred to as right to work?India has ratified both the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Articles 23 and 6, respectively, recognise the duty of the state to defend this right as well as the right to work in a profession of one's choosing.
The Taft-Hartley Act essentially gave rise to the nation's right-to-work legislation, which enable states to forbid requiring union membership as a condition of employment in both the private and public sectors. Every person has the right to decent working conditions. Every employee has the right to establish and join a union.
To know more about Human Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
What is theory and laws?
A well-researched explanation of observations is a theory. A statement that encapsulates the relationship between variables is known as a scientific law.
Theories connect what observations tell us about astrophysical objects to what is known about those objects physically, whereas observations are used to support theories.
A scientific theory is a well-supported explanation for a feature of the natural world that is based on a collection of facts that have been repeatedly verified via observation and experiment. These hypotheses are not "guesses," but rather trustworthy depictions of the world as it is.
Read more about theory and laws at
https://brainly.com/question/30051243
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a necessary skill for effective legal analysis?
A Drafting an issue statement.
B Properly defining terms.
C Element identification.
D All choices.
Answer: D - All choices.
Explanation: Effective legal analysis involves several skills, including the ability to draft an issue statement, properly define terms, and identify the elements of a legal issue. All of these skills are important in order to thoroughly and accurately analyze a legal issue.
Name at least 3 characteristics of black street gangs
Answer: violent, territorial, and predatory
Explanation: Black gangs have significantly evolved over the last 40 years, and trend analysis indicates that these gangs will continue to grow in both rural and urban areas. As gangs and gang membership increase, gangs will become more violent, territorial, and predatory in response to competition and rivalry.
Which of these is NOT one of the most common five ethical breaches you will see as a leader?
Bullying is not one of the most common ethical breaches one will see as a leader. The Option D is correct.
What does an ethical breach mean?An ethical breach occurs when someone within a system or community makes an ethical decision that sets a precedent for others to follow. The danger of ethical breaches is that they represent a fundamental shift in your organization's ethics.
Some examples of ethical breach include discrimination, safety violations, poor working conditions, and leaking confidential information. Bribery, forgery, and theft, while certainly unethical, cross over into criminal activity and are frequently dealt with outside the company.
Missing options "misusing company time counterfeiting theft bullying"
Read more about ethical breach
brainly.com/question/14864299
#SPJ1
Concerning the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy. Frank Palko had been charged with first-degree murder. He was convicted instead of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The state of Connecticut appealed and won a new trial; this time the court found Palko guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death. Protection against double jeopardy is not a fundamental right and thus falls outside constitutional protection- Palko was convicted and put to death in 19378.
The second conviction of Palko was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Cardozo laid out the guiding principles for the Court's activities throughout the following three decades in his majority judgment.
He pointed out that some provisions in the Bill of Rights, such freedom of speech and opinion, are basic, and that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment included these rights and applied them to the states. Double jeopardy protection was not a basic right. On April 12, 1938, Palko passed away in the electric chair in Connecticut. Only those rights that are "in the very core of a scheme of organized liberty" are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The phrase "so established in the traditions and sensibilities of our people as to be classed as basic" refers to the type of rights that fall under this category. According to Cardozo, the First Amendment's protections for "freedom of thought, and expression" provide "the matrix, the essential prerequisite, of practically every other type of freedom."
To know more about Bill of Rights click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
‼️‼️ Select the table that represents a linear function. (Graph them if necessary.)
The table that would represent the linear function is option C.
What is a linear function?In economics, the linear function is frequently used. It is alluring because to how straightforward and manageable it is mathematically. It has several significant uses. A straight line makes up the graph of a linear function.
Any function that depicts a straight line on the coordinate plane is said to be linear. For instance, the equation y = 3x – 2 indicates a straight line on a coordinate plane, indicating that it is a linear function.
When we graph the function that is in the table we are to get a straight line as the output.
Read more on linear functions here: https://brainly.com/question/15602982
#SPJ1
describe the articles of confederation and explain why it needed to be replaced.
The Articles of Confederation established a loose union of independent states with a meagre central administration that delegated most authority to the state governments.
The failure of the Articles of Confederation to regulate trade, collect taxes, and create consensus in their decision-making processes necessitated their replacement. The incapacity of the Articles of Confederation to regulate intrastate, interstate, and foreign trade was one of its main flaws. The Continental Congress approved the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.
This text functioned as the first constitution of the United States. It lasted from March 1, 1781, until the current Constitution took effect in 1789.
Read more about Articles of Confederation at
https://brainly.com/question/29612229
#SPJ4
What is the main reason the Supreme Court has nine justices?
What can the Supreme Court Cannot do?
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to carry out its rulings. It is unable to mobilize the military or order Congress or the president to comply.
To implement its decisions, the Court looks to the executive and legislative departments. The Supreme Court has occasionally had trouble enforcing its decisions.
For instance, some public schools continued to hold class prayers long after the Court had outlawed official religious events.
The only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution expressly mandates, the United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the land.
The Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices; Congress sets that number.
The Supreme Court often does not undertake trials, despite the fact that it may hear an appeal on any legal issue as long as it has jurisdiction.
To learn more about Supreme Court, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
What was Thoreau's purpose in writing civil disobedience?
The primary purpose of writing the Civil Disobedience was to cause resistance to civil government. This was to explain the need to prioritize one's conscience over the dictates of laws.
Thoreau begins his essay on Civil Disobedience by contending that the government rarely proves itself resourceful for the people.
He goes on to say that it derives authority solely because it is has the support of the majority and not due to the fact that they have the most legitimate viewpoint.
He reaffirms that an obligation rests on every person which is to do what they believe is the right thing and this self assertion is a right that each one holds.
This becomes more important in times when the government itself is unjust. Here the people must respond by disobeying the law and voicing their resistance.
A person is obligated not to participate in such evils but also not obligated to devote his life to eliminating evils from the world.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10905304
#SPJ4
2. Describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does
not have political agthority. Then explain whether you think the rule of law would
likely be respected under such a government.
A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.
Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.
In the field of criminal investigations, you may be asked to analyze forensic data. Imagine you are employed as a private investigator, and you are asked to present to your colleagues the information on a scientific method used in your selected case.
Select one of the cases from the FBI database. https://vault.fbi.gov/ any case
Create long slide 10 to 12 ppt in blank PPT presentation to address the following:
Provide a summary of your selected case.
Describe the process of the scientific methods used.
Describe what instruments/equipment were used that were crucial in solving this.
Explain what educational skills and training were necessary to solve this case.
Describe behavioral profiling methods.
What was the behavioral profile initially? Was it accurate, and why or why not?
Explain the results of the investigation.
Provide an overall assessment of the scientific methods and processes.
The FBI case includes the investigations, case crimes, and case scenarios. Some instruments/equipment used in solving the criminal case included fish bone diagrams and flowcharts.
What is the criminal case?Criminal case is the body of law dealing with crime. It defines behaviour that is perceived as threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of others, including oneself.
The educational skills and training required to solve the case are knowledge of sociology and anthropology for understanding society and culture.
stating the problem, forming the hypothesis, collecting the data by observing and experimenting, interpreting these data, and drawing conclusions are the process of the scientific methods used in each criminal case.
Therefore, This is 66% accurate and to determine whether material or inquiries are relevant to the investigation, investigators must ask.
Learn more about the criminal case, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11154610
#SPJ1
name at least 2 prison gangs
In our history, some of the most popular prison gangs includes:
Aryan BrotherhoodBlack Guerilla FamilyMexican Mafia (EME)La Nuestra FamiliaNeta Gang etc.What should we know about these Prison gangs?Prison gangs are criminal organizations that form in the penal system and operate within the United States' prison facilities. Each gang has its own set of symbols and ways for members to identify themselves as members of that gang. These prison gangs formed in various prisons over the course of several decades, and they are still active in the prison systems today.
Other facts about prison gang are as follows:
A prison gang is made up of 230,000 people who are incarcerated.In the prison system, there are approximately 52 active gangs, including six nationally recognized gangs.Prison gangs exist in all 50 states.The states with the most people involved in prison gangs are California and Texas.Prison gang violence increased 400% in 1996.Read more about prison gang
brainly.com/question/28333270
#SPJ1
What was Mendel first conclusion?
Mendel's first conclusion was: that hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
Although Gregor Mendel's rules serve as the theoretical foundation for our knowledge of the genetics of heredity, genetic analysis precedes Mendel.
Mendel contributed two new ideas to the field of genetics:
created clean lines
kept statistics notes and counted his findings
Mendel's Findings
1. The hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
2. For each investigated characteristic, a gene pair from each parent is present in each cell. One allele for the dominant phenotype and one for the recessive phenotype are present in the F1 from a cross of two pure lines. The gene pair is made up of these two alleles.
3. Since just one of the gene pair's members segregates into each gamete, each gamete carries only that one gene.
4. Gametes mate randomly, regardless of the other gene pairs that are involved.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
according to navy regulations when a sailor fails to obey a regulation and is subject to punishment which of the following publications should be made available to him for a personal review
The Chief of Naval Operations is in charge of making sure that US Fleet rules are up to date with what the navy actually needs.
The Navy
In order to undertake naval operations at sea, modern fleets incorporate surface warships, submarines, support ships, and ship-based aircraft.
The Navy maintains a fighting naval force that is equipped, trained, and capable of repelling invasions and defending maritime independence. They are also aware that the navy will be involved in unlawful activities.
The Chief of Naval Forces is responsible for ensuring that US Fleet regulations reflect what the fleet actually needs, which includes making all decisions pertaining to defense.
For such more questions Navy regulations
https://brainly.com/question/28344771
#SPJ4
Mia offers Nevin, a building inspector, money to overlook the violations in her new warehouse. Nevin accepts the money and overlooks the violations. Mia is charged with the crime of bribery. The crime occurred when ?
a. Mia offered the bribe.
b. Mia decided to offer the bribe.
c. Nevin accepted the bribe.
d. Nevin overlooked the violations.
Mia has been charged with bribery. Mia committed the crime by offering the bribe. Bribery is punishable by imprisonment of any kind for a term up to a year, a fine, or both.
Bribery is defined as the offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving of anything of value in order to influence the actions of someone with a public or legal duty. This type of action results in matters that should be handled objectively being handled in the manner best suited to the decision-maker's private interests. Bribery is thus a crime, and both the offer and the recipient can face criminal charges.
To learn more about Bribery, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/13808122
#SPJ4
Which of these is an exception to texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer?
a. Government sanctioned hayrides
b. On a beach
c. Parades
d. All the choices are correct
The exception to Texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer is Government-sanctioned hayrides, On a beach, and Parades, i.e Correct response is D- all above.
Operating an open-bed pickup truck or open flatbed truck in Texas with a child under the age of 18 in the truck's bed or trailer is a misdemeanour traffic infraction.
If you are found guilty, you could be subject to a fine of $25 to $200.
Texas legislators have passed traffic regulations aimed at protecting the safety of the general driving populace.
For instance, safety belts save thousands of lives each year. The purpose of speed limits is to deliver cars to their destinations safely and quickly.
Conversations on the phone and texting while driving are both hazardous diversions. Roadways are made safe by using traffic signals like flashing yellow lights and road signage.
To learn more about Traffic, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8890043
#SPJ4
In order to receive a certificate of completion for this Drivers Education course, you need to have reached 30 hours of course review time. Only after 30 hours have been reached will you be able to take the final exam and then, upon passing the final, receive your certificate of completion in the mail. If you do not reach 30 hours, you will not be able to take the final exam in order to receive your certificate of completion. T/F
The statement, to receive a certificate of completion for the Drivers Education course, one need to have reached 30 hours of course review time. So, only after the 30 hours have been reached one will be able to take the final exam is, true.
The Driver Education course is a program of study which is seen to be offered by a certified driver who is an education provider. This course enables a student to acquire the basic attitude, knowledge, and basic skill which is quite necessary in order to operate a motor vehicle.
However, the driver education course is offered by a school which tends to include the classroom instruction. Thus, after the completion of this course, the certificate is then provided. Hence, the driver education course is said to be very important.
To learn more about the Driver Education course here:
https://brainly.com/question/29389257
#SPJ4
In cases where informed decision makers such as trained medical staff or governmental officials agree that a research study has the potential to benefit a large number of people, written informed consent from participants is not needed.
The correct answer is False. Written informed permission from participants is not necessary when knowledgeable decision makers, such as skilled medical personnel or government authorities, concur that a research project has the potential to be helpful to many people.
A fundamental tenet of research ethics is informed consent. Its goal is to ensure that human participants can enter research freely (voluntarily), that they are fully informed of what it means to participate, and that they provide consent before entering the study.
Respect for people demands that subjects be given the option to decide what will or won't happen to them, to the extent that they are capable. When appropriate criteria for informed consent are met, this option is granted.
Read more about decision makers at
https://brainly.com/question/29035403
#SPJ4
What is the Supreme Court's rule regarding citizens rights?
The Supreme Court has interpreted the 14th Amendment in decisions that have influenced civil rights and freedoms in America for 150 years.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is unlawful to restrict someone's ability to exercise their right to vote, serve on a jury, own property, criticize the government,
engage in a variety of occupations, and remain in the United States on the basis of their race, religion, gender, or other protected characteristics.
The amendment was developed to address the racial injustice that Black people who had just been set free from slavery experienced.
It confirmed citizenship rights and benefits and, for the first time, ensured that all Americans would get equal protection under the law.
The struggle for racial equality and numerous other social justice movements continue to revolve around the 14th Amendment.
To make sure that its protections are comprehensive, much work still needs to be done.
To know more about Rights, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28685310
#SPJ4
What is the conclusion of Mendel's law of inheritance?
The conclusion Mendel reached was that plant traits are inherited independently, and no single trait influences other traits or traits.
Mendel proposed three laws of inheritance.
Law of Dominance - This law states that in the heterozygous state, the allele whose trait is transmitted through the other allele is known as the dominant allele, and the trait of the dominant allele is known as the dominant trait.
A character is a character that appears in the F1 generation.
Law of Segregation – This law states that when two traits are combined in a hybrid pair, the two characters do not mix and are independent of each other.
This means that during gametogenesis the two genes segregate completely independently of each other and the other trait segregates.
Law of Independent Sorting - The law of independent sorting states that different traits and traits have different genes, which influence each other and classify independently of other genes.
To know more about ‘Mendel laws’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29785146
#SPJ4
Protests demanding political and economic reform that spread through the countries of North Africa were part of the 2011 Arab Spring. Which one of the following did these countries have in common other than oppressive regimes and poor living conditions
After street vendor Mohamed Bouazizi set himself on fire, the Arab Spring began in Indonesia.
After ruling from 1987 to 2011, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali was deposed as the leader of Tunisia. Currently a democracy, Tunisia just held elections. Egypt - In one of the most iconic events during the Arab Spring, for several days in a row, thousands of protesters gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square to call for political change. Algeria - The Arab Spring quickly spread to Algeria, a neighbor of Tunisia, where former president Abdelaziz Bouteflika was forced to resign after having held office since 1999. As a result of this occasion, Hosni Mubarak, who had ruled Egypt since 1981, was deposed. Yemen - Violent protests there resulted in more than 2,000 fatalities.
Learn more about Tunisia here:
https://brainly.com/question/14172303
#SPJ4
How does the use of the word twitches in the stage direction?
Option b: Death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale, emphasizing the fact that it makes him uncomfortable.
Trifles examines identity issues by excluding the physicality of the central character, Mrs. Wright, from the stage. By taking that character off the stage, Glaspell shows how a person's identity was "innately created."
On-stage characters examine and discuss Mrs. Wright's personal life and her alleged crimes, allowing the audience to form an opinion about her. light.
The themes of the play revolve around sexism and oppression. Sheriffs and other men look down on women and say that men take care of the really important things and take care of the little things.
It is clear that his biased experts are already holding him back. But he acts like he's "on duty," so you could say he's at least trying to look professional.
To learn more about 'Trifles', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29618269
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Read the excerpt from part one of Trifles.
HALE. Well, my first thought was to get that rope off. I looked...(Stops, his face twitches.)...but Harry, he went up to him, and he said, “No, he’s dead all right, and we’d better not touch anything.”
How does the use of the word “twitches” in the stage direction most affect this scene?
It characterizes Hale as someone who is weak and cannot handle difficult aspects of the job.
It emphasizes the fact that death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale and causes him discomfort.
It hints to the reader that Hale may have somehow been involved and is acting out of guilt.
It reveals to the reader that Hale is extremely upset because he and Mr. Wright were very close.