The task forces, the groups of political parties, and also the other formal groups are included in the committees that Congress reviews before passing any judgment on the different bills.
The Congress is the sole authority that is responsible for passing the proposal of bills in the constitution of the United States of America. Moreover, the Congress not only passes, but also regulates the bills before them being instituted into the legal assembly. Thus, a set of members from the Congress are given the charge of reviewing the committees that have already been mentioned above.
Learn more about the Congress here:
https://brainly.com/question/7037597
#SPJ4
You can improve you ability to detect and report surveillance by doing all of the following except for
Lawful detection and surveillance are critical components of criminal justice practice. Detection can refer to the search for illegal items concealed on or in people or in the surrounding environment. Surveillance entails watching spaces, people, activities, and movements for illegal activity.
What is the process of surveillance?Process surveillance is the review of practises by staff directly related to resident care to determine whether facility IPC program policies and procedures are being followed. Hand hygiene is one example of process surveillance.
Surveillance is primarily detected by observing correlations to the target. Because you are the target in this case, the challenge is to detect if someone is correlating to you even if they are purposefully trying to do so behind you or at angles that are purposefully outside your field of vision.
Learn more about the process of surveillance here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871029
#SPJ9
Can you own a gun with a medical card in Arizona?
Arizona law allows for medicinal marijuana patients to own guns.
Arizona is one of the states in the United States that allows the use of medical marijuana. If you have a medicinal need for marijuana and are registered as a patient with the state, you will not be stopped from purchasing a gun at least by the state.
However, Arizona law and federal law are different. Under federal law, it is illegal for a person who is an "unlawful user" of a controlled substance to possess a firearm.
Since federal law still classifies marijuana as a controlled substance, it is possible that owning a gun with a medical card in Arizona could be considered illegal under federal law.
To know more about Arizona law here:
https://brainly.com/question/241955
#SPJ4
1st degree murder michigan is called__
1st degree murder in Michigan is called as Premeditation under the Michigan Penal Law.
The first degree murder can be referred to or considered as the type of murder, which is completely intentional, and has been committed with a proper planning, and thus, has signs of guilty mind of the murderer. Under the Penal Code of the Michigan State, the first degree murder is also called as premeditation since the murderer premeditates it. It is completely in contrast to the second degree murder, since it is unintended.
Learn more about first degree murder here:
https://brainly.com/question/13097311
#SPJ4
by law, if you are involved in a collision___O you do not have to stop if no one is injured O you are required to stopO you must call for roadside assistance O report to the nearest hospital
By law, if you are involved in a collision, you are required to stop. You are required by law to stop if you are involved in a collision to ensure that everyone involved is safe and to prevent further accidents or harm.
Stopping after a collision allows you to assess the situation, determine whether anyone is injured, and provide necessary assistance or medical care. It also allows you to exchange information with the other parties involved, such as contact information and insurance details, which is necessary for insurance claims and any legal proceedings that may arise from the collision.
To know more about collision, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13138178
#SPJ4
the heckscher-ohlin theory is based on the idea that
The Heckscher-ohlin theory is based on the idea that the pattern of international trade is determined by differences in factor endowments.
According to the Heckscher-Ohlin model of economics, nations should export the goods and services they can create most effectively and in large quantities.
It is used to assess trade, and more specifically, the equilibrium of trade between two nations with different skills and natural resources. It is also known as the H-O model.
The export of commodities requiring abundantly available production inputs is emphasised by the model. Additionally, it highlights the import of items that a country cannot produce as effectively.
It advocates for nations to appropriately import the resources they require while exporting the surplus materials and resources they have.
To know more about Heckscher-ohlin click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4626740
#SPJ4
which of the following was not a primary method by which the american government dealt with american indians during the period of western settlement? group of answer choices relocation appeasement extermination assimilation
During the time of western settlement, appeasement was not the main strategy used by the American government to deal with American Indians.
In a global context, appeasement is a diplomatic strategy that entails giving an aggressive power political, material, or territorial concessions in order to prevent conflict.
The phrase is most frequently used to describe the foreign policy of the British governments under Prime Ministers Ramsay MacDonald (1935–1939), Stanley Baldwin (1935–1937), and (most notably) Neville Chamberlain (1937–1940) towards Nazi Germany (from 1933) and Fascist Italy (from 1922). Under British pressure, France's foreign policy of the era included some appeasement of fascism and nazism, though this was never as popular as it was in the UK.
Learn more about " appeasement " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/11969058
#SPJ4
Which of the following is the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent?
A. timing of the duty to perform
B. number of parties involved in a contract
C. duration of performance
D. quality of performance
E. divisibility of contract
Timing of the duty to perform is the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent.
Hence, the correct option is A.
A condition precedent is an event or circumstance that must occur before a party is required to perform its obligations under a contract. In other words, the duty to perform is triggered by the occurrence of the condition precedent.
A condition subsequent, on the other hand, is an event or circumstance that terminates a party's obligations under a contract. In this case, the duty to perform exists until the occurrence of the condition subsequent, at which point it is terminated.
Therefore, the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent is the timing of the duty to perform. With a condition precedent, the duty to perform arises after the occurrence of the condition, while with a condition subsequent, the duty to perform exists until the occurrence of the condition.
To know more about conditions precedent here:
https://brainly.com/question/13841165
#SPJ4
what caused george mason to refuse to sign the draft constitution
Answer: As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, Mason refused to sign the Constitution and lobbied against its ratification in his home state, believing the document as drafted gave too much power to a central government and was incomplete absent a bill of rights to guarantee individual liberty.
Explanation: i smort
FILL IN THE BLANK. _____ believe that decisions are often more attributable to the biases and moods of decision makers than they are to the formal legal rules that are supposed to determine the outcome.
Legal realists believe that decisions are often more attributable to the biases and moods of decision makers than they are to the formal legal rules that are supposed to determine the outcome.
The legal-positivist position, whether Kelsenian or Hartian, became the prevalent viewpoint among legal philosophers in the 20th century, and along with it, a significant but very distinct way of approaching law arose.
This philosophy known as legal realism holds that all laws are products of prevailing social norms and government policy.
In accordance with this view, judges decide cases by taking into account social concerns and public policy in addition to abstract norms.
Legal realism and legal formalism are dissimilar in this regard. Either theory can be seen from a descriptive, prescriptive, or combined perspective.
To know more about legal realism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14482497
#SPJ4
what 2 countries signed a pact in 1939 why did they make the agreement
Germany and the Soviet Union are the two countries that signed a non-aggression pact in 1939.
On August 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression pact, It is also known as the Nazi-Soviet Pact, or the Hitler-Stalin Pact. Both the countries made an agreement that they would not attack each other and secretly divided the countries that lay between them. Germany claimed Western Poland and some portion of Lithuania. The Soviet Union was going to occupy Eastern Poland, the Baltic States and a particular portion of Finland. The pacts were intended to prevent the West or the Soviets from gaining influence in the Baltic states and thus encircling Germany. Sweden, Norway and Finland rejected the proposal. The treaty came into existence to maintain peace and harmony but instead the Pact prepared the way for World War II. The treaty was a huge failure and didn't meet its target.
To know more about "non-aggression pact in 1939" visit-
brainly.com/question/829803
#SPJ4
the function of business that acquires and manages funds within a firm is ___
The function of business that acquires and manages funds within a firm is commonly referred to as "finance".
Finance is the study and management of money, investments, and other financial instruments. Finance is an important function for individuals, businesses, and governments, as it helps them to make informed decisions about their financial resources and to manage financial risks.
The function is responsible for making financial decisions that help the company achieve its goals and objectives.
This includes tasks such as financial planning, budgeting, investing, managing cash flow, risk management, tax management, cost control, financial reporting, internal control and raising capital. The finance function also helps to manage financial risks and ensure that the company remains financially stable and profitable.
To know more about finance here:
https://brainly.com/question/10024737
#SPJ4
when presented with evidence of discrimination, an employer in a disparate impact case needs to show that the employment practice is a(n) blank . multiple choice question. unrelated to the way the company does business subjective measure of evaluation unintentional mistake business necessity
when presented with evidence of discrimination, an employer in a disparate impact case needs to show that the employment practice is a business necessity.
Business necessity is used to justify an employers employment criteria in a company which disproportionately affects a group of individuals. The justification implies that the company has legitimate reasons to operate under such barred employment environment. It substantially affects employers need in the company and work assigned to him. Every business has different position of employment and each position is differentiated in need and skill of the employees, the employees have to set according to the business and its needs so that business can grow significantly.
To know more about "Business necessity" visit-
brainly.com/question/16944534
#SPJ4
the 1876 constitution was so well written, it is rare for anyone to ask if we might need a new one.a. true b. false
Answer:
false.
so b)
hope this helps you
Political campaign rhetoric is protected speech under the First Amendment. Which of the following is a good definition of political campaign rhetoric?
A. Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people that may embellish and may not be honest.
B. Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people without embellishment and be honest.
C. Method of citing case studies without embellishment.
D. The story of a campaign that is based on honest statements.
E. None of these answers are correct.
The correct option is option A
A good definition of political campaign rhetoric is: Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people that may embellish and may not be honest.
Option A captures the basic nature of political campaign rhetoric, which frequently incorporates compelling words that may or may not be entirely true. It is not, however, restricted to speech and can incorporate other means of communication.
Option B is not an accurate definition because political campaign language is frequently embellished and may not always be totally truthful.
Option C is an incorrect definition since political campaign rhetoric is more concerned with selling ideas or candidates than with citing case studies.
Option D is similarly incorrect, because political campaign rhetoric is frequently based on subjective or incomplete information rather than entirely honest assertions.
For such more question on political:
https://brainly.com/question/2507057
#SPJ4
shaggy is investigating what he needs to do legally open a dog grooming business in his city. it is a mystery to him which of the following would govern the business g
shaggy is investigating what he needs to do legally open a dog grooming business in his city, the state statues and city ordinances but not modern laws govern the business.
The state statues i.e. laws made by the state and the city level ordinances of the local government govern the business of dog grooming. The city clerk issue licenses for the business and without obtaining the license one cannot practice such a business. The system is regulated by the state and other local authorities to maintain discipline in the business. Each state in the United States has different state laws and can change from place to place, and the union don't have any right on passing ordinances in such cases.
To know more about "ordinances" visit-
brainly.com/question/8815186
#SPJ4
what is the 10 amendment simplified
The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the Bill of Rights and it states that any powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.
In layman's terms, the 10th Amendment asserts that the federal government has only the powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers belong to the states and the people. This helps to ensure that the federal government does not grow overly powerful and that individual states can make judgements on specific issues.
For such more question on Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Summarize the events that happened in New Jersey vs TLO. Include how it started and then how it ultimately ended.
Answer:
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
Explanation:
governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products.
true/false
It is true to say that governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products.
In the midst of customers' rising dietary enhancement use, which spiked during the Coronavirus pandemic, Congresspersons Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Mike Braun (R-IN) presented bipartisan regulation on April 26 that would give the Food and Medication Organization (FDA) — the government can protect consumers by putting ban on unsafe products — more noteworthy perceivability into the items available. Seat urges Congress to quickly authorize the bill and guarantee the security and nature of all enhancements available.
As per a Seat review, barely any individuals comprehend FDA's momentum restricted job in directing the business. The organization misses the mark on capacity to be aware with assurance what dietary enhancement items are arriving at shoppers and what's in them. Existing regulation puts the onus on FDA to filter reports of damage from purchasers, specialists, and organizations.
To know more about consumer protection,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/27305515
#SPJ4
What is the evidence for and against the theory that Arthur Leigh Allen was the Zodiac killer?
The case of the Zodiac Killer, a serial killer roaming around Northern California in the 1960s and 70s is still an unsolved mystery where the prime suspect was Arthur Leigh Allen.
There are a number of evidence that are for and against Arthur Leigh Allen.
The killer used to often communicate with the police. The letters were written through a Royal typewriter, with the elite type. The same typewriter was found in possession of Allen.
There was a type of bomb that the killer talked about in his letters. A sketch of a similar kind of bomb was found at Allen's residence.
A victim and survivor of Zodiac killer had identified Allen in a lineup.
A DNA print that was found in one of the letters, did not match Allen's.
Allen's handwriting did not match that of the serial killer's.
To know more about the Zodiac Killer visit
https://brainly.com/question/29318851
#SPJ4
The ________ of a country specifies the rules that regulate political, social, and business activities so a society can pursue economic and social development and resolve disputes without collapsing into anarchy.O political systemO philosophical orientationO political philosophyO legal system
The Legal system of a country specifies the rules that regulate political, social, and business activities so a society can pursue economic and social development and resolve disputes without collapsing into anarchy.
The correct option is D.
A method or process for enforcing and interpreting the law is known as a legal system.
Some nations with dual systems exist. Such a system is governed by religious laws, and family law cases like marriage and divorce are decided by religious tribunals.
The more expansive areas of public and commercial law, however, are covered by a secular system with state courts. This still holds true in Israel, India, and Pakistan as it did in England until the 1850s.
The percentage of human activity in these dual jurisdictions that is governed by one system or the other may vary depending on the country's level of political and economic development.
To know more about legal systems, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ4
The directors and officers of Sports Color, Inc., vote to refuse to declare a dividend. The shareholders can:a. overrule the directors and vote to declare a dividend themselves.b. file an action to require the directors to declare a dividend.c. return treasury shares in exchange for a dividend.d. demand that a court declare a dividend.
In the above situation, it can be seen that the shareholders can file an action that would require the directors to make the declaration of a dividend, in case they refuse to declare a dividend. Therefore, the option B holds true.
A dividend may be considered as the part of return that the shareholders get as a part of their faith and investment shown in the company over a regular course of business operations of the companies. The declaration of dividend lies in the hands of the directors, however, the shareholders also have powers because of the ownership that they hold in that company.
Learn more about dividend here:
https://brainly.com/question/29510262
#SPJ4
To determine whether a classification violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the lowest standard of review is known as the ____ test.
a. intermediate scrutiny
b. suspect classification
c. strict scrutiny
d. rational-basis
The correct option is Option D
Rational-basis test is the lowest standard of review used to determine whether a classification violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In the United States, rational basis review is the standard of review that courts use when evaluating constitutional issues, such as due process or equal protection challenges under the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments.
Laws that affect people based on their race, for example, are subject to stringent scrutiny and must be justified by the government with solid reasons.
Constitution was replaced the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, in 1789. It began with seven articles that set the national framework and government constraints.
For such more question on Rational-basis:
https://brainly.com/question/27880846
#SPJ4
a nurse manager is reviewing the good samaritan laws with a group of newly licensed nurses. which of the following statements by the nurse manager is appropriate?
The statement that the nurse manager would have to be correct is "If you render aid in an accident, do not leave the scene until another competent person can take over."
What is meant by nurse manager?One appropriate statement for a nurse manager to make when reviewing Good Samaritan laws with newly licensed nurses could be:
"The Good Samaritan laws are designed to protect healthcare providers, like ourselves, who provide emergency medical assistance in good faith outside of the workplace. These laws provide legal immunity and protect us from being held liable for any injuries or harm that may result from providing medical assistance in an emergency situation."
It is important for the nurse manager to accurately and clearly explain what the Good Samaritan laws are, why they exist, and how they apply to healthcare providers.
Read more on nursing here:https://brainly.com/question/6685374
#SPJ1
A group of college students create a website that lists creative insults about President Obama.
a. Is this situation Constitutional?
b. What Amendment is?
c. Cite relevant text in Amendment:
No, the situation of a website listing creative Insults about President Obama.Is not indigenous as it violates the principle of respect for public officers and the President's right to privacy and class.
The First Amendment is applicable to this situation, which protects freedom of speech and expression.The First Amendment doesn't cover speech that's intended to harm or defame someone differently. Public officers have a right to privacy and quality that can be violated by similar insults.
Thus, creating such a website would be considered vulnerable speech under the First Amendment. Any attempt to harm or defame public officials isn't defended by the Constitution.
To learn more about First Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ4
question 14a. the law of independent assortment states that alleles of different genes assort independently during gamete formation. this law is carried out during
The law of autonomous assortment states that during gamete formation, alleles from various genes assort separately. This law comes into play during meiosis.
Meiosis involves a diverse group of cells. During the procedure, these divided, haploid chromosomes were produced. Grasp the law of autonomous assortment requires an understanding of the rule of segregation. This gives various gamete cells access to two unique genes. Mendel's independent assortment law states that the alleles of two or more distinct genes are independently selected into gametes. In other words, the allele for one gene does not change in a gamete when it acquires an allele for another gene.
To learn more about meiosis, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/3565757
#SPJ4
which of the following would be commonly reported in the summary of significant accounting policies note? group of answer choices errors and fraud method used to record depreciation subsequent events related-party transactions
the method of recording depreciation that is typically noted in the summary of material accounting policies note
The summary of significant accounting policies provides details on significant accounting practises, such as revenue recognition, depreciation methods, and inventory costing. A wide range of operational and financial policies, such as those pertaining to cash, receivables, intangible assets, asset impairment, inventory valuation, different types of liabilities, revenue recognition, and capitalised costs, may be included in the policy summary. The reporting entity should disclose material accounting principles used. Such disclosure should list and explain the accounting principles that have a significant impact on how financial position, operational results, or cash flow changes are determined.
Learn more about " accounting policies " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/24215375
#SPJ4
True or False: a regime shift in ecological resilience is when a system loses resiliency in its current state and transitions to a new state.
A regime shift in ecological resilience is when a system loses resiliency in its current state and transitions to a new state. - True
The degree of disruption that a system can withstand without changing its self-organized structures and defined processes is referred to as ecological resilience. This idea can be utilized to explain why some communities recover quickly from a natural disaster whereas, other communities are completely destroyed.
When an ecosystem shifts from one stable state to another, it experiences a total regime shift in ecological resilience. This transition is frequently brought on by disturbances or changes in the environment that are greater than what the ecosystem can absorb or adapt to. The system's overall stability, biodiversity, and capacity to deliver ecosystem services may be significantly impacted by this, leading to the loss of resilience in the old state and the emergence of new ecological processes.
Read more about ecological resilience on:
https://brainly.com/question/24507092
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. Negligence is imposed because the activity involved is so dangerous that there must be full accountability, even if the activity is necessary and cannot be prohibited
The statement "Negligence is imposed because the activity involved is so dangerous that there must be full accountability, even if the activity is necessary and cannot be prohibited" is false.
Negligence simply means lack of care, the failure to meet a desired standard established to protect society from unreasonable risk. Negligence arises where a person is given some kind of liability, it is term often used in tort law. When the key damage is personal or related to property its one of the main component is negligence. Four basic elements of negligence is duty to care, breach, causation, and damages. Negligence arises when their is a damage or harm cause by breach of rules and lack of responsibility and care. A defendant to be liable for negligence must carry some duty towards the plaintiff.
To know more about "Negligence" visit-
brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ4
What is the meaning of this Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression?
Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression means to the freedom of the share the opinion as the without interference.
What is Article 19?During the period December 10th, 1948 was the 70th years ago was the established the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The main motive to the share the opinion as the freedom of the speech and expression of the everyone right.
According to the Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was to declare the freedom of the speech and expression are the everyone right to the freedom to the share opinion specially media. Because fourth pillar of the Democracy.
As a result, the significance of the Article 19 are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Article 19, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28670413
#SPJ1
What are 3 sentences using bias?
Out of the choices provided above, the sentences that use bias are given as under,
Reporters must be impartial and not show political biasThere has always been a slight bias in favor of/towards employing liberal arts graduates in the company.There was clear evidence of a strong bias against her.Therefore, the options B, C, and D hold true.
A bias can be referred to or taken into general understanding as a social concept wherein an individual or a group is discriminated owing to a partial behavior against themselves. The condition of bias is to be understood as the one wherein the things go either in their favor, or against their will due to a particular position that they hold.
Learn more about bias here:
https://brainly.com/question/15135672
#SPJ4
Complete question
What are 3 sentences using bias?
Options
A. The senator has accused the media of bias.
B. Reporters must be impartial and not show political bias.
C. There was clear evidence of a strong bias against her.
D. There has always been a slight bias in favour of/towards employing liberal arts graduates in the company.