Answer:
A nurse
Explanation:
Nurses tend to show compassion and care for their patients.
A soldier would present most protective or loyal
A bed would be most lazy
And a flood would probably be most chaotic
Hope this helps!
Answer:
its a nurse
Explanation:
i took the test
Help ASAP
Read the poem and answer the question
What would the poet do early in the morning if I was the lord of Tartary?
Only answer if you are sure!! I will give brainliest
Answer:
He would wake in a bed of ivory, wear a robe a beads, and have all meals summoned to him
Explanation:
I hope this helps you out, this is just what I’m getting from the question. You should add on some words and a sentence or two if you want a good grade.
Read the passage from Christabel. Which line from the passage best summarizes the theme of the passage no doubt
Explanation:
i wanna help you but idk what is Christabel
Answer:
A. No doubt, she hath a vision sweet.
Explanation:
The entire passage is supporting this answer choice.
Passage:
No doubt, she hath a vision sweet.
What if her guardian spirit 'twere,
What if she knew her mother near?
But this she knows, in joys and woes,
That saints will aid if men will call:
For the blue sky bends over all!
Question: Which line from the passage best summarizes the theme of the passage?
Answer choices:
A. No doubt, she hath a vision sweet.
B. What if her guardian spirit 'twere,
C. What if she knew her mother near?
D. That saints will aid if men will call:
Which step should students take after analyzing multiple sources of information?
A determine a claim
B create the research plan
C narrow their research topic
D develop a primary question
Answer:
C narrow their research topic
Explanation:
This is because, analyzing of the multiple sources helps the student to access the best materials for his or her project. As all the information is gotten, it would enable the student to narrow his or her research topic by sticking to the relevant materials while discarding the irrelivant ones.
Answer: determine a claim
Explanation:
2.) PART A: What does the word "compelling" mean as used
in paragraph 122
A.) to urge someone to do something.
B.) to think deeply about something
C.) to become slightly interested in something
D.) to scare someone into doing something
3.) Part B: Which quote from paragraph 12 best supports the answer to Part A?
A.) "After dithering about like this in the in the cold for two or three minutes"
B.) "When all at once his eye was caught and held in the most peculiar manner"
C.) "Each word was like a large black eye staring at him through the glass"
D.) "Forcing him to stay where he was and not to walk away from that house"
4.) What can the reader infer about the landlady from her conversation with Billy in the sitting room?
A.) She was a doctor or likely had some medical training, as evidenced by her ability to stuff her pets.
B.) She is a lonely old woman who lost her son in the war and tries to replace him with her particular tenants.
C.) She may have witnessed something terrible and suffers memory problems because she cannot recall Billy's name correctly.
D.) She may be more threatening than she appears because her words suggest she was involved in the two men's disapearances.
5.) Which of the following details from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
A.) "He guessed that she probably lost a son in the war, or something like that, and had never got over it" (Paragraph 49)
B.) "Left?" she said, arching her brows. 'But my dear boy, he never left. He's still here. Mr. Temple is also here." (Paragraph 82)
C.) "he caught a whiff of a peculiar smell... he wasn't quite sure what it reminded him of. Pickled walnuts? New leather? Or was it the corridors of a hospital?" (Paragraph 78)
D.) "if I happen to forget what you were called, then I can always come down here and look it up. I still do that almost every day with Mr. Mulholland and Mr... Mr..." (Paragraph 103)
Story- The Landlady
Please I need helpppp.......
Answer:
PART A: What does the word "compelling" mean as used in paragraph 122
A.) to urge someone to do something.
3.) Part B: Which quote from paragraph 12 best supports the answer to Part A?
C.) "Each word was like a large black eye staring at him through the glass"
4.) What can the reader infer about the landlady from her conversation with Billy in the sitting room?
D.) She may be more threatening than she appears because her words suggest she was involved in the two men's disapearances.
5.) Which of the following details from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
A.) "He guessed that she probably lost a son in the war, or something like that, and had never got over it" (Paragraph 49)
Explanation:
Please help me with this. The photo is attached below.
Answer:
The answer can be (c)mysterious and secretive mood
Read the sentence.
Both are countries located in South America.
Which word signals that two things are being compared?
both
are
in
located
Answer:
both
Explanation:
Answer:
its a both
Explanation:
i know it beacause i already did it
Throughout most of the story, you can conclude that George treats Hazel
rudely
gently
poorly
unfairly
In Harrison Bergeron
Answer:
Gently
Hope this helps! God bless! :)
HELP ASAP 25 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!
In one or two paragraphs of a minimum of 150 words, compare and contrast how sound devices are used in the poems “The Bells” by Edgar Allan Poe and “She Walks in Beauty” by Lord Byron.
Answer:
In Edgar Allan Poe's poem, "The Bells", he uses repetition and assonance throughout the whole poem. Some examples are "...bells, bells, bells" and "...tinkle, tinkle, tinkle". This gives a gloomy or eerie feeling. In "She Walks in Beauty" by Lord Byron, he uses alliteration in the following quote : "Of cloudless climes and starry skies". This helps us see how elegant this poem is and how much he likes the girl.
Help! Its due in 10 minutes.
Fill the correct form of verb please.
1.I ___(work) hard so that I could pass.
2. How long you____( stand) here?
Answer:
A) WORKED B) STOOD
Explanation:
GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
1. I worked hard so that I could pass.
2. How long you stood here?
Explanation:
Worked is used here, and is the past-tense verb for work. Generally, past-tense verbs refer to actions or events in the past. In the sentence, the person is referring to how they worked hard so that they could pass. Keep in mind that there are also other words that give hints to show what verb tense you should use, such as the word "could". Could is also past of can, which implies that this has happened not in the future, not in the present, but in the past..
Stood is used here because once again, it is the past-tense verb for stand. Again, if you use context clues and dig deeper into the text, you can see that whoever asked this question, is asking how long you stood here? They were not asking that question in the future, nor in the present time, so just be aware to use context clues to figure out the tenses of the verbs.
change to passive voice
Answer:
Explanation:I don't say u must have to mark my ans as brainliest but my frnd if it has really helped you plz don't forget to thank me...
Answer:
Football was being played by him. His homework was completed by Arun.My dinner was being eaten by me. Letters were delivered by the postman.English was taught by Mother. Hope it helps1. "Kaitlyn!" I shrieked when I saw my best friend run through the door, "You're back!"
Kaitlyn had been vacationing at Myrtle Beach for a week and we couldn't wait to see each other.
She glanced at my ears. "Where are your earrings?"
She was referring to a pair of earrings she had bought me for my birthday just before she left.
They were small, shiny blue crystals dangling from a short silver chain. "I haven't put them on
yet; I was planning on wearing them today." I rushed to my room to retrieve the earrings, but
when I opened the door to my jewelry box, they were gone!
"I'm positive I put them there before going to bed. I know who must have done it!" I hurried
into the living room, where my two brothers and sister sat, lazily watching television.
"Which one of you stole my earrings?" I demanded.
"What would I want with a pair of stinking earrings?" claimed Zack, and Jeremy quickly agreed.
"It's not like we wear the things."
"I didn't steal your blue crystal earrings," said Sabrina. "Then who did?" I asked.
Kaitlyn smiled. "I think I know."
Who stole the earrings? And how did Kaitlyn know?
PLEASE HELP
ILL GIVEYOU BRAINLIEST ANSWRR
Answer:
Sabrina stole the earrings.
Explanation:
Because she hadn't told them that it was her blue crystal earrings, Sabrina had known that they were though!
Answer:
Sabrina stole the earrings.
Explanation:
Because she hadn't told them that it was her blue crystal earrings, Sabrina had known that they were though!
PLZ URGENT
Facts about Nicola Sturgeon
Answer:
Nicola Sturgeon (born 19 July 1970 in Irvine, Scotland) is a Scottish politician. On 19 November 2014, she became the 5th First Minister of Scotland. She was previously the Deputy First Minister of Scotland, Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing, Deputy Leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP) and is a Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) for Glasgow Govan.
Nicola Sturgeon studied at the University of Glasgow and attempted to become a Member of Parliament at the 1992 and 1997 General Elections. In 1999, she became an MSP representing the Glasgow region. She became the Deputy Leader of the Scottish National Party in 2004 and because Alex Salmond was still an MP, she was the SNP's leader in the Scottish Parliament until the 2007 Scottish Parliament election. At the 2007 election, Nicola Sturgeon became the MSP for Glasgow Govan and her party formed a minority government with Alex Salmond as First Minister.
On 19 November 2014, Nicola Sturgeon became First Minister of Scotland, succeeding Alex Salmond, who had resigned after defeat in the Scottish independence referendum. She is the first woman to hold this position.
Explanation:
A. The fact that the word "freedom" is capitalized shows that the speaker places great importance on it.
B. Words and phrases such as "great task," "resolve," "energy," and "faith" reveal that the speaker feels inspired and has a positive outlook.
C. The speaker uses those who have died in war as a reason why the living should unite in freedom.
D. The specific viewpoint is religious, because the speaker mentions God.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A) word freedm is capitalized in Excerpt 2 only
B) the statement summarizes both excerpts
C) This death has been mentioned in excerpt 1 only
D) None of the viewpoints are religious.
The excerpts are attached.
It's B
I just finished the test myself
Which appeal seems to be lacking in president SNOW’S SPEECH? WHY DO YOU THINK THIS APPEAL IS LEFT OUT? What effect might it have on his audience?
Answer:
The appeal that's lacking in President Snow's speech is an appeal to logos.
This appeal is deliberately left out so that President Snow could rule over the people by filling them with fear.
If his speech would have included logic then the audience will stand in rebel against him.
Explanation:
"The Hunger Games" is a series dystopian novel written by Suzanne Collins. The novel is divided in three parts 'The Hunger Games', 'Catching Fire', and 'Mockingjay.'
President Snow was a tyrannical ruler of the city Panem in the novel, in the second and the third part of the novel. After Katniss defended against the authorities in previous series 'The Hunger Games', a chain of rebellion sprouted in the city.
President Snow delievered a speech in Mockingjay addressing to audience of Panem and reminding them of the cost their rebellion might cause them. His speech consist of an appeal to emotion of fear as well as an appeal to his credibility because of his tyrannical rules. The appeal that lacked in his speech was an appeal to logos. His speech lacked logic as it was delivered to appeal more to the emotion of fear to his audience.
The reason his speech lacked an appeal to logic was because he wanted to inculcate a sense of fear in his audience. If we observe his speech, he intended to bring a sense of fear of death or loss of loved one.
Sentences such as 'Possessing them will be considered treason', 'Punishable by death', etc. all serves to put his audience to fear him. So that they may not trespass the rules of Panem.
The effect this speech have on his audience was they did not even of rebelling against him or the rules of Panem. If his speech would have included logic, the audience would have been stand against him in rebellion. He wanted to inculcate fear in the hearts of his audience because he witnessed that Katniss's behavior in 'The Hunger Games' had brought a seed of rebellion in people. Logically Katniss was the winner of 'The Hunger Games' but that also created rebellion in people for their government.
So, this is why an appeal to logic is deliberately left out in President Snow's speech.
It should be noted that the appeal that's lacking in President Snow's speech is an appeal to logos.
Appeal to logosThe appeal to logos is deliberately left out so that President Snow could rule over the people by filling them with fear. The appeal to logo is the use of facts Ina speech.
In this casez, if this speech would have included logic then the audience will stand in rebel against him. Therefore, it was intentionally left out.
Learn more about appeal to logos on:
https://brainly.com/question/2437320
How important do you think it is to protect the environment
Answer:
Very important, the environmental health is rapidly decreasing due to humans. A lot of plant life from the ocean give us a lot of the oxygen that we breath. So if there are no plant then there is no oxygen we can breath.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Write an analytical essay of at least 750 words, in which you identify two central claims in "The Fallacy of Success," detailing how the author develops these claims. Your essay should include strong textual support, specific details, and a clear introduction and conclusion. Additionally, you should follow MLA guidelines for in-text citations and a works cited page. Click here to view the MLA Style Guide.
Explanation:
I really agree with the author about the sad way in which many people see success, even many of those people waste time publishing publications on how to "achieve success and be happy", when in reality happiness does not depend on success or Social position or studies that we have, happiness depends on feeling good about ourselves, feeling loved and accepted by our family, friends and acquaintances.
In reality, to achieve success and achieve our goals, we must first feel satisfied and happy with what we are and have achieved, that gives a sense of achievement to our way, according to Gomez Ruben (2015); true success in life lies in knowing how to live each day doing well what you have to do in each reality in which you are located. If you do your job well, take care of your family, cultivate your relationship with your partner, strengthen ties with your relatives and friends, you are succeeding in each of those areas because you are successfully completing each of the tasks and needs that encompass your life. A housewife who takes care of her home is a successful woman; the peasant who cultivates the field with love to provide sustenance for his family is a successful man; The young man who, by following his principles, has not betrayed or “straightened” others to advance financially, is a successful person.
To be happy is to be at peace with every aspect of your life, despite the circumstances that surround it. It does not mean being free of problems or having all your needs resolved. But none of those circumstances affect your mental and emotional stability.
On the contrary, can someone who, by satisfying only one area of his life, neglected all the others, be considered successful? Or is he who, even with a good financial position, cannot sleep in peace for a single night? How many people have sacrificed life, family, health, children and many other things to achieve a job promotion, stay well with friends or grow a business (I do not judge, I have done it many times and it is not entirely bad) so that , after a while stopping and turning to look back on the road, it is discovered that perhaps it was not worth so much what was lost for what was gained. Has this really been successful?
Answer:
The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.
Explanation:
Which is the best example of author Carolyn Cinami DeCristofano's use of humor in A Black Hole is NOT a Hole? If the Sun suddenly turned purple, you wouldn't see it happen. Events beyond the black hole's "horizon" are invisible to us. Even though you know it's still out there in space, you can't see it. After it sinks below the horizon, Earth blocks your view of it.
You wouldn't notice if the Sun suddenly turned purple. So option "B" is the correct answer to the following question.
Example of author Carolyn Cinami DeCristofano's humor:For young readers interested in "astronomy," Black Hole Is not a Hole is a great introduction to an exceedingly "difficult scientific idea."
In a vibrant and at times amusing narrative, the book opens with a full overview of "gravity" and its function in "black hole development."
Carolyn Cinami DeCristofano guides readers on a trip through the "galaxies" to find answers to these "questions" and many more about the "phenomenon" known as a "black hole."
Find our more about 'Astronomy'.
https://brainly.com/question/5165144?referrer=searchResults
PLEASE HELP ME I NEED ANSWERS
A
C
B
Are the order of the answers.
Can anyone please summarize this. Please do not
copy the sentences from the text Thank you...
Answer:
This is only like about half of it but hope it helps
Explanation:
In Britain, the average person spends more than the one thousand euros on new clothes a year. Online shopping means it is easy for customers to buy without thinking. Major brands offer such cheap clothes that they can be treated like disposable items. Britain throws away three hundred thousand tons of clothing a year, most of which goes into landfill sites.
Is the part of a sentence containing the verb and any direct or indirect object,but not the subject.
no its not a sentence. to have a sentence you must have a subject and a verb but a do and and io are optional
Who said in "The Outsiders", “They grew up on the outside of society. They weren't looking for a fight. They were looking to belong.” Also what's the meaning behind this quote?
Answer:
The quote does not appear in the novel , but it does appear on the posters advertising the film version of The Outsiders from the flim on 1983. The lines appear above a photograph of the actors portraying the Greasers in the film, describing what some might believe to be the essence of Greaser identity: the need to belong.In both the film and the novel, the Greasers actually enjoy a sense of belonging when they are amongst themselves. Their outsider status is determined only by their position in comparison to the West Side Socs and the other members of the community who see Greasers as thugs.
Meaning:
This tagline is therefore poignant from an emotional point of view, it suggests that the Greasers want to be a part of the greater society that rejects them and misunderstands them.
How is a root word used to understand a text? It reveals the style of the writer. It alerts the reader that a technical term is being used. It gives the reader an understanding of the writer’s tone. It provides the foundation for a word’s meaning.
Answer:
It provides the foundation for a word’s meaning.
Explanation:
Let's say, for example, you encountered the word "unhappiness" within a reading text. And, let's say that you had no idea whatsoever what the affixes -un and -ness meant. You would at the very least be able to recognize (a form of) the word 'happy' as the root of the larger word and know that the word had something to do with the concept of "happy."
Answer:
D: It provides the foundation for a word’s meaning.
Explanation:
edg2020
Which transition best completes the sentence?
therefore
as a result
because
however
Answer:
idk what sentence but therefore is what I usually say or as a result
Answer:
pretty sure its A.
Explanation:
What structural decision does William Carlos Williams make in “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” that makes the poem seem short and quick?
Answer:
the lack of punctuation
Explanation:
Why do Helios and Boreas agree to have the
contest?
Answer:
A dispute of power.
Explanation:
Helios and Boreas agreed to a competition to prove who was the most powerful between the two. Boreas, The Northern Wind, tried to blow the man's clothing off with all of his might. The more he tried, the tighter and more snug the garment became. Boreas called to Helios to prove his strength. Helios, The Bright Sun, shone his warm rays of light upon the man, and slowly he took off his cloak.
I love Greek mythology, so I hope this helps! :)
HELP!!! CRITICAL THINKING. The Coates family expects their pet golden retriever to have puppies any day now. A newspaper ad is placed by Mr. Coates, in preparation to sell the puppies. Calls are made by numerous interested people. The birth of a large litter of puppies causes the family to ask questions of everyone they know. Advice is given to the Coates family by several neighbors, as the puppies are becoming more and more active. During a visit to the vet, three of the eight puppies escape to three parts of the office. Then, when the Coates family gets home, one puppy digs under the fence, and all eight puppies scatter in different directions through the neighborhood. The puppies are chased down by all five members of the Coates family. The neighbors all bring leashes to help get the puppies under control. Stories are told by the neighbors to other neighbors who did not see the event. Three of the puppies are bought by the Santiago family. The family has three children, so each child is responsible for the care of one puppy. A big exhale is let out by the Coates family once the Santiago family drives away. Only five puppies will have to be watched constantly by the family. They know it won't be long before the puppies are gone, and life in the house will be back to normal. They give their best effort at containing the puppies, so there is no more digging out of the yard. One week later only one puppy remains, and the Coates family decides to keep him.
What sentence uses clear and concise language?
The puppies are chased down by all five members of the Coates family.
The neighbors all bring leashes to help get the puppies under control.
Only five puppies will have to be watched constantly by the family.
One week later only one puppy remains, and the Coates family decides to keep him.
PLEASE HELPL
Answer:
I would say that D, "One week later only one puppy remains, and the Coates family decides to keep him."
Explanation:
First, I would like to discuss the reason I would consider this sentences clear and concise.
We can see that is gives us a direct time, one week, instead of just "later."
We can see that it gives us an exact number of puppies left, one.
We can see that it gives us a gender, being male.
We can see that it gives us the actual name of the family, the Coates.
Now, lets talk about the falls of the other 3 senteces.
In A, it does not discuss how many puppies are being chased down.
In B, it does not discuss which neighbors bring leashes and does not establish what puppies needed to be controlled.
In C, it does not discuss what family will be watching the five puppies.
With the given information, I would choose D.
Hope this helps!
I need to know the answer
Answer:slove it your self
Explanation:
Where do you most often use your bank debit card? Click on the button (circle) eside your choice.
1. at the automatic bank machine (ATM)
2. to buy groceries
3. to buy gas
4. to pay for food in a restaurant
5. to buy clothes
6. don't have a debit card
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Hope it helps :)
I REALLY! REALLY!! REALLY!!! NEED HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND VOTE AND WILL RATE!!!! AT LEAST TAKE A LOOK PLEASE!!! WILL FOREVER THNK YOU!!!!
17. What is the effect of Jonathan Edwards' comparison between God holding humans over hell and a human holding an insect over a fire?
A) God is portrayed as a sympathetic and loving caretaker.
B) God is portrayed as a flawed being just as humans are flawed.
C) God is portrayed as all-powerful and frightening.
D) God is portrayed as a child who is curious about the natural world.
Answer:
C) God is portrayed as all-powerful and frightening.
Explanation:
The impact of Jonathan Edwards' analogy between holding an insect over a fire and holding humanity over hell is given in option (C): "God is portrayed as all-powerful and frightening."
How did Johnathan Edward potray god?God, according to the Miscellanies, is "being in general"; he "is the sum of all being, and there is no being without his being; all things are in him and he in all.
David Edwards resisted. He maintained the role of emotion in religious experience not as "animal instinct," but as a component of human volition in his Treatise on Religious Affectations.
He questioned if the religious authority could come from subjective experience alone at the same time.
Edwards holds that God is triune (three in one, one in three), and that the love of the Trinity is relational.
God conveys this love to the entire creation, giving it the opportunity to participate in this divine life of love since the Trinity is a result of the divine community's self-understanding in God.
Check out the link below to learn more about Jonathan Edwards;
https://brainly.com/question/17577177
#SPJ2
Can anyone plz help me