Answer:
The European takeover of Africa was fueled by the desire for industrial markets, Natural resources of Africa, the competition between european countries to be powerful and by explores and missionaries who came home with stories about Africa.
Explanation:
Hope this helps out
Propaganda posters painted an unrealistic picture of war because they showed Americans as
men and women united in the war effort.
people taking part in unpatriotic activities.
only happy people, not people suffering or dying.
people taking part in antiwar activities
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I found the answer on a different site
Answer:
c
Explanation:
what did austria-hungary annex??
Answer :On October 6, 1908, the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary announces its annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, dual provinces in the Balkan region of Europe formerly under the control of the Ottoman Empire.
Explanation:
Have great day!
13. What is a new idea that a culture accepts?
A. Diffusion
B. Immigrant
C. Innovation
D. Pull Factor
Answer:
i think the answer is c but i may be wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
c, Innovation
Explanation:
A new idea that a culture accepts. Diffusion. A process occurring when a idea or innovation spreads from one person or group to another and is adopted. Globalization.
Which marker shows where in the world did the religion of Judaism begin?
Answer:
Jews originated as an ethnic and religious group in the Middle East during the second millennium BCE, in the part of the Levant known as the Land of Israel. The Merneptah Stele appears to confirm the existence of a people of Israel somewhere in Canaan as far back as the 13th century BCE (Late Bronze Age).
Explanation:
Judaism was founded by Moses, although Jews trace their ancestry back to Abraham, who lived around the year 2000 BCE. The hearth of Judaism is in Canaan, in what is now modern-day Israel and Palestine.
In what geographic region or Islam Judaism and Christianity founded
Western Europe
South Asia
North America
The Middle East
Answer: The Middle East
Explanation: It's probably really late for this haha
Answer:
the anwer is D
Explanation:
What was the stamp act?
a. a British law against charging colonists for postal service
b. a means of making colonial post offices profitable
c. a tax the British imposed on the colonies to help pay off their debt
d. a British restriction on colonists moving west
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
C. a tax the British imposed on the colonies to help pay off their debt
Did, A. Sam Houston or B. Mirabeau Lamar want to prove to mexico that Tx was strong and willing to fight?
Answer:
Northerners didn't want Texas to join the Union because it did so as a ... revolutionary in the fight for Texas's independence from Mexico. ... with his old political rival, Sam Houston, in typically florid prose: “The ... still uses the motto “Texas: It's like a whole other country,” Lamar
Explanation:
What is the main idea of the Ten Commandments
Answer:
The Ten Commandments, or Decalogue, are the ten rules given to Moses by God that dictate how humans should live and interact with one another, according to Judaic and Christian traditions, with God being referred to as Yahweh.
Explanation:
What is the opposite of fundamentalism
Answer:
casual,unattached................
Which group did Quanah Parker lead a band of Native American fighters from to
resist settlement of the Plains?
A Comanche
B Kiowa
C Arapaho
D to Cheyenne
Answer: A
Explanation: Took the test
a\a\a\
a
a
aa
aa
a
a
a
a
Answer: A. Comanche
Explanation: I took the test and got it right.
What was the significance of the Homestead Act of 1862?
A. It led to the California gold rush and set the territory on the path to
statehood.
B. It encouraged Americans to settle and develop the land west of
the Mississippi River.
C. It established vast new American Indian reservations that
promoted assimilation.
D. It promoted the development of southern-style plantations
throughout the West.
Answer:
The Homestead Act of 1862 was one of the most significant and enduring events in the westward expansion of the United States. By granting 160 acres of free land to claimants, it allowed nearly any man or woman a "fair chance.
Explanation:
hope this helps you!
correct answer is B; it encouraged americans to settle and develop the land west of the mississippi river.
what is the name of the work published by isaac newton in 1867
Answer:
The answer is Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
Explanation:
what is the answer history 6 explain
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
D. The Growth of Cities
Explanation:
This answer seems to be correct to me since a lot of cities including New York were growing rapidly during the Industrial Revolution with the factories producing more goods and more people moving to urban areas looking for jobs allowed these cities to grow and expand.
Before Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, he had:
A. signed the Emancipation Proclamation.
B. been elected president during the cold war.
C. spent time in jail for attempting to vote illegally.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. Signed the Emancipation Proclamation
Explanation:
The Gettysburg Address talked about the fallen soldiers of the civil war, which was a direct result of his signing the proclamation
Explain why would the Roman Republic be a better form of government for a Plebian?
Answer:
The Roman Republic was the era of classical Roman civilization, led by the Roman people, beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire.
Explanation:
Please please please I’ll give you brainlist
Answer:
A
Explanation:
which flaw in the government created by the articles of confederation did shays rebellion make apparent?
Answer: Shay's rebellion had brought out the weakness of the Article of Confederation. It had found that the central government has no efficiency to govern the government and shouted for reconstruction of the article.
Explanation:
What made the Roman Republic and Empire powerful?
If you apply for a patent for a new invention, this application is evaluated for approval by A.State governors. B. the Department of Commerce. C. the Department of Justice. D.the Department of the Interior.
Why is it important to understand the history of policing in the United States?
Which of the sentences below would go in the "problem/concept:column of an everything-i-know chart?
A. how much money do i need to buy my books
B. i know that im going to have to take a math class next semester
C. what do i need to do before going to school
D. im not sure how many credits i need to take to graduate
Answer: D
Explanation:
Everyone doesn’t kniw how much credits they need at first
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What might happen to a country where Social Darwinism is believed by everyone and put into practice?
cons of the equal rights amendment
Answer:1. It requires a three-fourths ratification from the states to become law.
The Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed in 1923. It wouldn’t be passed as a possible amendment until 1972. Because there is a 75% requirement for ratification by the states to make an amendment to the Constitution, 38 states must agree with the proposal for it to become law. Congress set a deadline of 1982 for legislatures across the country to ratify the amendment. By the time the deadline expired, only 35 had endorsed the idea.
If Congress were to pass another version of the Equal Rights Amendment today, then that process would need to start over. There is still no guarantee that there would be enough support at the state level to approve the amendment.
2. Five states have actually rescinded their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
In the 1970s, there were five states that decided to rescind or withdraw their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. They were Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky, and South Dakota. What is interesting about the Constitution is that it only speaks to the power of a state to ratify an amendment. It does not suggest that there is a power in place to rescind this authorization. The current precedents would suggest that it would not be possible to do so. If another state were to join the 37 who have already said yes to this idea, then it would likely create another legal showdown that would need to be settled in the Supreme Court.
It should also be noted that a federal court ruled that offering a time extension for the amendment was unconstitutional and that states could withdraw their previous support, creating a different precedent to consider. The Supreme Court only ruled that the entire point was moot because there was not a complete ratification.
3. It would not protect people who do not identify as male or female.
Because the Equal Rights Amendment was originally crafted over 40 years ago, the recent issues of gender identification would not be included in the final text after ratification in the amendment’s current form. The goal is to provide women with equal protections, which is a necessary first step. Individuals who identify as non-binary, agender, or facing androgyny choices may not receive the same protections under the law. There is also the possibility that transgender individuals who complete their transition may not qualify because of their “change” from one gender to another.
4. The amendment could take away some of the benefits that women enjoy.
Phyllis Schalfly does not apologize for her opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. Even in 2007, when writing a piece for the Los Angeles Times, she said that the process of granting equality should not involve taking away the privileges that women have fought so hard to earn in the first place.
“The amendment would require women to be drafted into military combat any time men were conscripted,” she wrote. “[It] would abolish the presumption that the husband should support his wife and take away Social Security benefits for wives and widows. It would also give federal courts and the federal government enormous new powers to reinterpret every law that makes a distinction based on gender, such as those related to marriage, divorce, and alimony.”
5. It could create fewer barriers to prematurely ending human life potentiality.
Whether you support the idea of abortion, are against it, or find yourself somewhere in the middle, this medical procedure does create an ending to that human life potentiality. There are times when it may be medically necessary. Some may pursue such an action because of their personal preferences or needs. When looking at how the ERA would address this issue, there is an excellent chance based on previous state-based rulings that it would expand opportunities where permitted. Just as this option was listed as a potential advantage, it could also be a potential disadvantage depending on what your perspective happens to be.
A Final Thought on the Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment
It is easy to get bogged down in the semantics of an argument about a specific piece of legislation, forgetting that we are all basically on the same side. Well over 95% of the U.S. population supports the idea of ensuring that women receive the same rights as women guaranteed in the structure of our government. How we decide to make that happen is our debate.
Some suggest that the 14th Amendment does enough, while others say it is not enough. There are benefits to the ERA that would be helpful, but it could also provide a lot of uncertainty. Even the chance to pass it now is uncertain since the deadline given to it is in the resolution language that proposes the text instead of the amendment itself.
Explanation: source - https://connectusfund.org/7-strongest-pros-and-cons-of-the-equal-rights-amendment
Answer:
It allowed everybody to vote and have the same rights no matter the color of your skin or gender
Explanation:
hope thta helped
The Carlisle Indian School was one of many boarding schools built as part of the push for Americanization in
the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Why were schools such as this started?
Answer:
To force american indian to give up their native cultures and adopt new traditions
Explanation:
What background knowledge would best add to a reader's understanding of a newspaper article about climate change? оооо knowing how to accurately measure temperature knowing how to use energy more efficiently knowing the effects of temperature increases knowing the weather forecast for the week
Answer:
What background knowledge would best add to a reader’s understanding of a newspaper article about climate change? A) knowing how to accurately measure temperature. B) knowing how to use energy more efficiently. C) knowing the effects of temperature increases. D) knowing the weather forecast for the week.
Explanation:
C) knowing the effects of temperature increases.
The background knowledge that best add to a reader's understanding of a newspaper article about climate change is to know the effects of temperature increases.
What is climate?Climate is the average weather condition in a premise area that altered in an extended period of time. It is basically defined as the pattern of whether in an area that typically is about 30 years.
The background of the climate change from the newspaper understanding is to know the effect of increased temperature.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about the climate, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10440860
What’s the answer to this question?
Answer:
King Tut is important because he was the best ruler of Ancient Egypt
Explanation:
So the answer is the fact of that king Tut is important for he was the best ruler so it's the 4th one on your checkboxes
Answer:
The tomb of King Tutankhamen is one of the most famous because of its well-known discovery by Howard Carter, a British archaeologist. The tomb was important because it let archaeologists record what an Egyptian king’s tomb looked like and learn more about ancient Egypt.
Explanation:
I hope this helped. I know it's not one of the answers but it should help a little bit.
He was the friend of Jesus that brought back to life
Answer:
Saint Lazarus
Explanation:
Should civilians be military targets?and why not ?
What is a benefit of using an offline source over an online source?
Answer:
Online sources can be altered while offline sources cannot be altered which makes it a bit better
Explanation:
Answer:
I think if you use an offline source, then you spend less time on the internet, and you engage more. versus if you are online there are so many distractions. for example what if your favorite you...tube...er.. posts a to die for video, but you are studying online, that would be a major distraction and quite honestly a chance to procrastinate. hope this helped.
Help please I’m confused
Answer:
i believe its C
Explanation: