Answer:
Members of Congress introduce legislation, for example, bills, joint resolutions, concurrent resolutions, and simple resolutions. They essentially become the legislation's sponsor.
Explanation:
They enable their constituents to sponsor bills.
What are members of the legislature accountable for?Legislatures are made of man or woman members, known as legislators, who vote on proposed legal guidelines.
What are the 2 most vital capabilities of Congress?through legislative debate and compromise, the U.S. Congress makes laws that have an impact on our day-by-day lives. It holds hearings to inform the legislative system, conducts investigations to supervise the executive department, and serves because of the voice of the humans and the states within the federal authorities.
Learn more about the legislation here https://brainly.com/question/4384
#SPJ2
Each state has its own body of criminal law.
Answer:
whats the question?
Explanation:
PLEASEEEEE HELP!!!!
What is the main idea of this passage?
Tornados are fierce storms.
Tornados are violent storms and storm protection is often the key to saving lives.
People who live in Tornado Alley often have cyclone cellars.
A tornado's winds can be powerful enough to rip roofs off of houses, uproot trees, and lift heavy objects off of the ground.
Answer:
A tornado's winds can be powerful enough to rip roofs off of houses, uproot trees, and lift heavy objects off of the ground. D
Explanation:
Think about it, the main idea is like a summary. You have to figure out what makes the topic stand out.
What part of the Marbury v. Madison precedent furthers the idea of “Checks and Balances”?
Answer: the principle of judicial review
Explanation:
In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that courts could challenge the constitutionality of other branches of government´s actions.
Known as the principle of judicial review, this decision furthered the importance of the system of checks and balances, meant to set a limit to the powers of all branches of the Federal Government.
hey yall ❤️
i kind of need help and your opinion at the same time. so
the question is
do you think your ideas and beliefs are best represented by the Democratic Party, Republic Party, or neither why
Answer:
Republican because the Democrats are stupid. Their beliefs are the complete opposite of mine
Explanation:
If a pregnant woman in labor stole a car because she feared delivery of her baby was imminent and she had no other means of transportation, she may use the defense of:
Answer:
Necessity
Explanation:
Answer:Necessity
Explanation:
Your boss at Swift Electronics decides against the recommendations you made Six months later, a supplier sends the wrong projection device in response to your order. The supplier then refuses to correct the mistake. Your boss hires an attorney at $250 per hour and takes you to lunch to admit she made a mistake in not following your ideas. Ultimately, the case is set for trial. What type of jurisdiction will this court have? What will be done during the trial?
Question 7 of 30 Antitrust laws promote greater efficiency and lower prices by protecting what? O A. Workers W B. Consumers C. Competition D. Infant industries SUBMIT
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Answer:
C. competition
Explanation:
Which is a confirmatory test for drugs?
OA microscopic test
B. microcrystalline test
OC. spectroscopy
OD. color test
O E mass spectrometry
Answer: Mass Spectrometry
Explanation: got this on my test
Morgan Pitt is a 30 year old dentist who opened a bottle of soda produced by the soda pop company. The bottle exploded. Flying glass cut her face, including her eyes. Doctors removed the glass from her eyes, but Morgan was left with only limited vision. Because she can no longer perform her job as a dentist, Morgan sues the soda pop company for her medical bills and future loss of income over the next 35 years.
B- Explain exactly what the plaintiff would need to prove in order to win the case.
C- determine who, if anyone, you believe should have to pay for the plaintiffs damages, and WHY.
I’ll give brainliest to whoever answers first, & correctly!!
Answer:
hdjdhevejejejeifirir
i need help plsssssss
Answer:
Explanation:
B and D are both Modern. B is a Modern Republican. (Bush Sr.) D is a modern Democrat (Clinton).
That leaves Jackson (A) and Jefferson (C)
Jackson was a man of the people. He had to be a Democrat. So he was the first Democratic President.
That leaves Jefferson who was the founder of the Democratic/Republican Party. Jefferson was a typical early American who believed that the left and right could hear each other clearly.
pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
Answer:
EZDmertzy07
Explanation:
What does your BAC level need to be to be considered drunk in most states?
Answer:
i believe it is 0.5 or 0.2
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST
Click the links to open the resources below. These resources will help you complete the assignment. Once you have created your file(s) and are ready to upload your assignment, click the Add Files button below and select each file from your desktop or network folder. Upload each file separately.
Assignment Information
Purpose Write a Supreme Court opinion that describes your decision for United
States v. Fields.
Assignment Prompt
In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
the fictional case of United States v. Fields. Remember, you are serving as a Supreme
Court justice. Your opinion must summarize the facts of the case, state your decision,
and cite precedent to support your ideas.
Step 1: Carefully review the progress you have made up to this point.
a) Take time to review the facts.
) Why was Abel Fields convicted?
(2) What law was he convicted under?
(3) How did the appeals court rule on the case?
(4) What has Fields argued in his case before the Supreme Court?
(5) What are Fields's prosecutors arguing?
b) Take time to review precedent.
(1) What did New York Times v. Sullivan demonstrate about the right to make
false statements?
(2) What did Texas v. Johnson demonstrate about the right to disagreeable
speech?
Step 2: Develop a three- to four-paragraph opinion.
a) Your opinion should be three to four paragraphs long and written in your own
words.
b) The introduction should:
(1) Review the facts of the case
Answer:
The links do not work. Sorry.
Answer:
This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.
He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues.
During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal. However, each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal. After being found guilty and charged with an $1,000 fine, Fields appealed the court’s decision which brings us here.
Abel Fields argued that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional, and that his right to free speech had been violated, therefore, I will be taking in a count of several similar rulings on other cases to help me make a decision.
What was the main theme of FDR's address to the nation after he won the election?
Answer:
He was ready to give the people the new leadership they wanted.
Explanation:
Answer:
He was ready to give the people the new leadership they wanted.
Explanation:
FDR said that the vote showed that the people wanted a new kind of government, and he was ready to give it to them. He seemed eager to get started and to do the people's will.
why does the government restrict seditious speech?
Answer:
Sedition refers to legitimate activities that seek to overthrow a government by force or disrupt it by violence. It is restricted by the government, because language can be used as a weapon.
We live in a democracy in Canada. Why do the vast majority of citizens accept the disadvantage(s) of democracy?
Answer:
Explanation: The House of Commons plays an important role in Canada’s system of government: it debates issues, votes on the passage of laws and ensures the Government is held accountable.
Members of Parliament (MPs) sit in the House of Commons to represent their local communities, known as electoral districts, also commonly referred to as constituencies or ridings.
Canadian MPs almost always or typically belong to a political party:
A lawyer is assigned to defend a suspected murderer. Which work ethic would be important in order for the lawyer to best defend the individual?
Answer: the Lawyer needs to find evidence that the murder suspect wasn’t there when the death happened. Also the Lawyer needs to find other suspects which could lead to the actual murder. They need to ask the question like; Who was the last person with the person who got murder? Why would mider suspect kill that person. When the Lawyer finds other suspects the lawyer needs to ask; What kind of person the murder suspect was? Did them argue constanly? The Lawyer needs to ask the murder suspect where he was that night. Every little detail and find suspects that saw him or her there at the time of the murder
Economic costs for automobile collisions can include hidden costs.
True Or False
- it’s on drug and alcohol btw
Answer: its false i took this test awhile ago and i got it right its FALSE
In regards to whether economic costs of automobile collisions include hidden costs, this statement is False.
When there is a car collision, there will be costs to all parties involved in the accident and one such cost is economic costs.
Economic costs will include explicit costs such as the cost of fixing the car, as well as implicit costs such as the cost of time taken to fix the car that could have been spent pursuing other endeavors.
There are no hidden costs when it comes to economic costs.
In conclusion, the answer is false.
Find out more on implicit costs at https://brainly.com/question/7824689.
whats PINS in ny? My school sent me a letter said I need PINS and there going to contact the court because of me.
A child under the age of 18 who does not attend school, or behaves in a way that is dangerous or out of control, or often disobeys his or her parents, guardians or other authorities, may be found to be a Person In Need of Supervision or "PINS". All PINS proceedings are heard in Family Court.
what Google said anyway-
What is another word for RECIDIVIST
Answer:
relapsed ( adjective) fallen angel (noun) habitual criminal (noun) prisoner (noun)
What is the law of dating someone who is 18 when you 13-16.
Answer:
FREEEE POINTS since they deleted the question 0_0
Explanation:
1. What are the overall powers of the legislative branch?
2. Briefly compare debate rules in the House and the
Senate.
3. What are the special powers of the House of
Representatives?
4. What does the phrase advice and consent mean?
The ________prohibits the torture of citizens by law enforcement authorities.
Answer:
the law prohibits the torture of citizens by law enforcement authorities
Explanation:
4.
signs warn drivers of work zones and provide clues as to the
conditions ahead.
A. White
B. Yellow
C. Blue
✓
D. Orange
Answer:
I think its yellow
Explanation:
What sets the policy for executive agencies to follow?
A. a congressional-executive agreement
B. an executive agreement
C. a treaty
D. an executive order
Answer:
A a congressional-executive agreement
HEY! Vaping is not cool. Especially if you are below the age of 18 or older. No one should vape, not even adults because it can cause hair loss, yellow teeth, cancer, and more. You can do your part by not doing it. #helpstopvaping. DO NOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION! srsly
Yes it isn't good for the health of a child or anyone at all.
When is a member of Congress going to be most interested in having the president come campaign for her?
- right after the signing of a major piece of legislation
- during a midterm election
- when the president’s popularity is high
- following a hard-fought primary season
Answer:
Abstract
Presidential influence is partly a function of the partisan, economic, and international context within which the president governs. Presidents are, however, more than bystanders relying on the political milieu for policy opportunities. Recent scholarship demonstrates that presidents consciously influence this milieu and build political capital by campaigning for congressional candidates. We contribute to this literature by assessing the effects of presidential campaigning on legislative support for two presidents who governed under extremely dissimilar circumstances: Bill Clinton in the 106th Congress and George W. Bush in the 108th Congress. We find evidence of campaign effects on congressional policymaking during both administrations.
Journal Information
The Legislative Studies Quarterly is an international journal devoted to the publication of research on representative assemblies. Its purpose is to disseminate scholarly work on parliaments and legislatures, their relations to other political institutions, their functions in the political system, and the activities of their members both within the institution and outside. Contributions are invited from scholars in all countries. The pages of the Quarterly are open to all research approaches consistent with the normal canons of scholarship, and to work on representative assemblies in all settings and all time periods. The aim of the journal is to contribute to the formulation and verification of general theories about legislative systems, processes, and behavior. The editors encourage contributors to emphasize the cross-national implications of their findings, even if these findings are based on research within a single country. The Legislative Studies Quarterly is the official journal of the Legislative Studies Section of the American Political Science Association.
Publisher Information
Washington University creates an environment to encourage and support an ethos of wide-ranging exploration. Washington University’s faculty and staff strive to enhance the lives and livelihoods of students, the people of the greater St. Louis community, the country and the world.
According to the Constitution of 1878,power in the United State is divided in to:
Please this is urgent thank uuuu
Answer:
Power is given to both congress and the citizens
Explanation:
A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cruiser, the officer tells him three times to “show your hands.” The young person did not show his hands and may have reached toward his belt. Within two seconds of arriving, he was shot and killed by the police officer. The young person turns out to be 12 years old and the gun turns out to be a toy. Is this a justifiable use of force by the officer? Explain your answer.
Answer: I would suggest looking at the Tamir Rice and Tyre King cases. Most of the 911 calls describe them as men with guns, and don't indicate an age. Now police officers don't have the luxury of knowing whether or not a gun is fake, and that's why it's a dangerous job. In both cases, the 911 operator failed to mention that these "guns" these young boys were carrying might be fake, and that they are most likely juveniles, so their was a miscommunication there that could've saved someone's lives. In regards to the Tamir Rice's case, the fatal shot that killed Rice was shot within seconds of the officers arriving on the scene. Why wouldn't an officers first instinct not be to neutralize a suspect non-lethally? These are hard questions and answers. Now parents fear that if there child is seen playing with a toy gun outside then they may be shot and killed. I guess by law they replica guns are indistinguishable and if an officer fears for their lives it's justified. Personally, I think it isn't it's very clear looking at Tamir Rice he is a child!!! I think deadly force should be a last result, and for them to pull a gun on him without evaluating the scene makes me think it had more to do with racial stereotyping more than anything.
Read this prompt for an argumentative essay.
Abraham Lincoln once stated, “The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves—in their separate, and individual capacities.” Do you agree or disagree with this position? Write an argumentative essay that explains your opinion of the quotation.
What will be the topic of the essay?
the purpose of government
the presidency of Lincoln
the need for community
the rights of individuals
I am getting different answers, I hear that it is either A or B, please answer soon :)
Answer:
the purpose of government
Answer:
A
Explanation:
(person below) :) good luck!