What is the gradient?

Answer:

630

Step-by-step explanation:

the value of 7 in the tenths place is 70

the value of 7 in the hundredths place is 700

compare 700 and 70

So 700-70 = 630

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

→ Work out the change in distance

160 - 40 = 120

→ Work out the change in time

3 - 1 = 2

→ Apple speed = distance over time

120 ÷ 2 = 60

I think "u" stands for units. [tex]u^2[/tex] means units squared which is like saying ft^2 if you were looking for the area of something with feet dimensions. So in this case, the circle has a diameter of x units (u) and an area of x units^2 ([tex]u^2\\[/tex]). It is not the same as r. "r" is most always going to be used to represent the radius.

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the slope formula to find the slope

m = ( y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

    = ( 7-2)/(5-6)

    = 5/-1

    = -5

Answer:

40

Step-by-step explanation:

that's how it is done hope it will help

Compound inequalities are used to combine several inequalities

The solution as a compound inequality is [tex]374<x <404[/tex]

Assume the correct amount of jelly beans in the jar is x.

15 away from x can be represented as 15 - x or x - 15

The correct number of jelly beans is given as 389.

So, when the statement is represented as an absolute inequality, we have:

[tex]|x - 15| < 389[/tex]

Express as compound inequality:

[tex]389 - 15<x <389 + 15[/tex]

Evaluate like terms

[tex]374<x <404[/tex]

Hence, the solution as a compound inequality is [tex]374<x <404[/tex]

Read more about compound inequalities at:

https://brainly.com/question/1851664

Using the t-distribution, it is found that since the test statistic is more than the critical value for the right-tailed test, it can be conclude that the isolated compound gives more counts than those from background, and hence, we can be 95% confident that the compound is indeed radioactive.

At the null hypothesis, it is tested if isolated compounds do not give more counts than those from background, that is:

[tex]H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \leq 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the give more counts, that is:

[tex]H_1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 > 0[/tex]

Using a calculator, the mean and the standard deviation for each sample are given by:

[tex]\mu_1 = 33.2, s_1 = 6.058[/tex]

[tex]\mu_2 = 24.25, s_2 = 4.35[/tex]

Considering the sample sizes of 5 and 4, respectively, the standard errors are given by:

[tex]s_1 = \frac{6.058}{\sqrt{5}} = 2.71[/tex]

[tex]s_2 = \frac{4.35}{\sqrt{4}} = 2.175[/tex]

For the distribution of differences, the mean and standard error are given by:

[tex]\overline{x} = \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 33.2 - 24.25 = 8.95[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{s_1^2 + s_2^2} = \sqrt{2.71^2 + 2.175^2} = 3.4749[/tex]

The standard error was found from the standard deviation for each sample, hence, the t-distribution is used.

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{s}[/tex]

In which [tex]\mu = 0[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, hence:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{8.95 - 0}{3.4749}[/tex]

[tex]t = 2.58[/tex]

The critical value for a right-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is greater than a value, with 5 + 4 - 2 = 7 df and a 0.05 significance level is of [tex]t^{\ast} = 1.895[/tex]

Since the test statistic is more than the critical value for the right-tailed test, it can be conclude that the isolated compound gives more counts than those from background, and hence, we can be 95% confident that the compound is indeed radioactive.

A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24826023

Answer:

The answer is going to be A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

They are equal acute triangles, are congurent. Your welcom

Answer:

i think C. 0.06 is answer

Step-by-step explanation:

6% = 6/100 = 0.06

[tex]6\% \\ = \frac{6}{100} \\ = 0.06[/tex]

Answer:

C) 0.06

Hope you could get an idea from here.

Doubt clarification - use comment section.

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

this is because a square has 4 and one side has a measurement of 2in

so you would and all the sides (2+2+2+2) which will give you an answer of 8

It's probably 52 or 40.

Answer:674.475

Step-by-step explanation:

(690)(0.15)= 103.5

690-103.5= 586.5 (after first markdown)

(586.5)(0.15)= 87.975

586.5+87.975 (Final price after markup)

Answer:

135% = 27/20 = 17/20 as a fraction

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write down the percent divided by 100 like this:

135% = 135/100

Step 2: Multiply both top and bottom by 10 for every number after the decimal point:

As 135 is an integer, we don't have numbers after the decimal point. So, we just go to step 3.

Step 3: Simplify (or reduce) the above fraction by dividing both numerator and denominator by the GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) between them. In this case, GCD(135,100) = 5. So,

(135÷5)/(100÷5) = 27/20 when reduced to the simplest form.

As the numerator is greater than the denominator, we have an IMPROPER fraction, so we can also express it as a MIXED NUMBER, thus 135/100 is also equal to 1 7/20 when expressed as a mixed number.

Step-by-step explanation:

again, a line cutting through 2 parallel lines must have the exact same angles with both of them. otherwise they would not be parallel.

therefore, both angles must be identical

3x + 2 = 2x + 6

x = 4

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

If p = 14

rewrite the equation

so replace the variable with 14.

now do basic subtraction.

14 - 8

= 6

Answer:

the answer is in the site faith mate is the same question and in that site have the response np

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

To reduce a fraction: divide the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, GCF.

Fraction: 7/18 already reduced to the lowest terms.

The numerator and denominator have no common prime factors.

Their prime factorization:

7 is a prime number;

18 = 2 × 3^2;

gcf (7; 2 × 3^2) = 1;

Fraction: 13/36 already reduced to the lowest terms.

The numerator and denominator have no common prime factors.

Their prime factorization:

13 is a prime number;

36 = 2^2 × 3^2;

gcf (13; 2^2 × 3^2) = 1;

Reduce (simplify) fractions to their simplest form, online calculator

Answer:

Its Number of Seats

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Click the picture and u will see the answer.

#CarryOnLearning

The summation of the given function from 1 to 4 is 10.5x³.

The given parameters:

[tex]\Sigma \ x^3 \times \Delta x, \ \ \ \Delta x = 2 + \frac{i}{4} \\\\[/tex]

The summation of the given function from i = 1, to i = 4, is calculated as follows;

[tex]\Sigma \ x^3 \times \Delta x = x ^3 (2 + \frac{1}{4} ) + x ^3 (2 + \frac{2}{4} ) + x ^3 (2 + \frac{3}{4} ) + x ^3 (2 + \frac{4}{4} )\\\\= x^3(10\frac{1}{2} )\\\\=\frac{21}{2} x^3\\\\= 10.5x^3[/tex]

Thus, the summation of the given function from 1 to 4 is 10.5x³.

Learn more about summation of functions here: https://brainly.com/question/16599038

Answer:

All the mentioned can be constructed with the help of piling method. But, for construction of B and D we need a point as well.  

Please give brainliest only need 3 more brainliest before next rank!

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Yes, a cube can be formed by stacking polygons. If we stack squares one upon another, then the resulting 3-D figure would be a cube.

b) Yes, a cone that does not include the point can be made by stacking disc. If we stack discs such that the discs are arranges in descending order then the resultant 3-D figure would be a cone that does not include a point.

c) Yes, a pyramid can be formed by stacking polygons.

If we stack squares such that they are arranged in descending order of their side length and stacked by a point on the top. Then the resultant figure would be a  pyramid that includes a vertex.

f) There are many types of prism. Fro example a rectangular prism can be constructed by simply stacking rectangle polygon on one another.

e) Yes, a cone can be formed by stacking disc.

We need to stack disks arranged in descending order of their radius stacked with a point on the top. The resulting figure would be a cone that includes a point.

f) Yes, a cylinder can be formed by stacking. We need to stack discs of same radius to get a cylinder.

Answer:

B and D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$572

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is : 180° - (61° +61°) = 58°

Answer:

The change in temperature is -13°F.

Step-by-step explanation:

The change in temperature is,

→ -1 + x = -14

→ x = -14 + 1

→ [ x = -13 ]

Therefore, -13°F is the change.

Answer:

2/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Try to make equal sections. The fraction they are asking for has the shaded number of sections on top (this us called the numerator) and the total number of sections on the bottom (this is called the denominator) see image

Answer:

2x - 19 + x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

2x - 19 + x + 4