One of Paul Revere’s most recognized works is the engraving below called “The Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in King Street in Boston," showing a confrontation between British soldiers and American colonists in 1770
What was Paul Revere’s purpose in creating the engraving?
Answer:
To use the dramatic scene to stir Boston's citizens against the british
Explanation: Because this picture was a propaganda to make the Boston citizens go against the British.
On March 5th, 1770, a party of the 29th Regiment committed the Bloody Massacre in King Street, Boston.
What was Paul Revere's intention when he carved the engraving?On the evening of March 5, 1770, a raucous throng assembled outside the Custom House on King Street in Boston to harass the British soldiers stationed there with jeers and snowballs.
Tensions began to rise, and a patriot crowd attacked a British loyalist in Boston in February 1770, killing a youngster when he shot a gun at them.
Brawls between colonists and British soldiers continued over the next few days, culminating in the Boston Massacre.
To utilize the dramatic incident to incite Bostonians to oppose the British because this image was intended to incite Boston residents to revolt against the British.
For more information about Bloody Massacre, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/883664
What is the difference between public forum and private property?
You have the right to (blank)
the crime you are being charged with, see the (blank)
being used against you, and question any (blank) used against you
please help
1st blank: you have the right to remain silent.
2nd blank: I'm sorry I dont know
3rd blank: anything you say may be used against you in the court of the law
Answer:
Explanation:
You have the right to remain silent, anything you can can and will be used in the court against you. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”
what are 10 values of constitutional democracy?
Answer: These values include human dignity, the achievement of equality, the advancement of human rights and freedoms, non-racialism and non-sexism, supremacy of the Constitution, the rule of law, democracy, social justice, equity and respect.
Explanation:
3. If a family has a dispute over a will, what kind of case will arise?
contract
family
probate
tort
Answer:
family
Explanation:
because it involves family issues
Do believe the U.S justice system has improved or still needs work?
Answer:
still needs works
Explanation:
joes biden stop the building of wall in some borders
Answer:
I think that yes they have improved bu,r the system stiles needs even more work.
Explanation:
joe Biden is doing everything he can as fast as he can but I would say improve even more.
The payment of money or other considerations to police officers with the intent to subvert the aims of the criminal justice system is known as what
What check does the U.S. Senate have on the president?
worker has passed out while working with chemical. what do i do?
explain the rule of laws. how is this principle essential for an effective democracy to function?
Answer:
Rule of Law: A Necessary Accompaniment for Democracy The use of arbitrary power is anathema to the rule of law. In democracies, constitutional limits on power require the subjugation of state authority to a country's laws as established through popular consent and adopted by the people’s representatives as determined in free elections.
Explanation:
Which best explains how the Senate affects the powers of the president?
The Senate must approve many presidential actions.
The Senate often has more powers than the president.
The Senate must have the same powers as the president.
The Senate often rejects many presidential actions.
Answer:
The Senate must have the same powers as the president.
Explanation:
EDGE LOVE
The correct answer is: The Senate must have the same powers as the president.
Explanation:
Important point is that When president shall have a great Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, then its make to Treaties, They are provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and also It shall be nominated by and with that Advice which they are Consent of the Senate, shall appoint the Ambassadors, Also in another side than the public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and also all other Officers of the United States.Learn more about:
https://brainly.com/question/16193475
Why do you think libel cases are difficult to prove?
Explanation:
Libel refers to specific facts that can be proved untrue. ... Libel laws are meant to monetarily compensate people for damage to their reputations–not to punish people who make false statements. It's harder for a public figure to win a libel lawsuit than it is for a private person to win a libel lawsuit.
Anger management-
Directions: Read each of the scenarios below and identify how the person is reacting to anger.
1. Bob is in line at a sandwich shop. A stranger tries to cut in front of him. Bob pushes him out of the way.
2. Sandy’s teammate runs into her during a soccer game. Sandy says “Excuse me. Could you please not do that again?”
3. Tim’s history teacher springs a pop quiz on a reading assignment that he didn’t get to. Tim is angry about not doing well on the quiz. He asks himself what he needs to do to stay on top of assignments.
4. Sue has a crush on James. She confided in her friend Tina that she wants to ask James to the Cadet Ball. The following week, she learns that Tina asked James to the ball and he accepted. Sue is mad, but says nothing to Tina because she doesn’t want to argue.
5. Adrian’s parents won’t give him money to buy a video game, after they promised he’d get a reward for good grades. He’s angry and asks his parents why they are breaking their promise. He learns that his dad will be losing his job next month. Now Adrian’s video game does not seem so important.
6. Jade’s mom is driving her to a track meet where she expects to win a medal in her event. There is an accident on the highway and a huge traffic backup. Jade may not be on time for her event. She’s angry about the possibility of missing out after she’s worked so hard. She turns on her favorite music, and envisions winning her race.
This is a assignment for JROTC , So it is considered to be related to law.
Please give me a quick answer if you can it would be helpful.
Answer:
1. Bob’s reacting to anger by pushing the stranger out of the way.
2. Sandy’s reacting out of anger by asking them if they couldn’t do it again, and they probably didn’t mean to run into her.
3. He’s reacting out of anger by using his feelings and thoughts.
4. Sue reacting to anger by suppressing it, which could cause problems.
5. Adrian’s reacting to anger by using his feelings and thought , then shows empathy when he understands what's going on.
6.Jade’s reacting to anger by just turning on her favorite music and relaxing which is a healthy anger management.
Explanation:
Pls help for my civics class
What would happen if organ systems failed to work together?
Answer:
Your organs will not work in the process they will work and so will your respiratory system
Explanation:
Which sentence currently disqualifies Annie from becoming a US citizen?
Annie turned 28 years old last September. She has been residing in the United States for seven consecutive years. She also possesses a good and righteous moral character. She can’t speak or write English, but she’s very skilled in French.
Answer: because she can’t speak or write English, she is “disqualified” to become an U.S. citizen.
Explanation: to become a U.S. citizen it is required to be able to read, write, speak English and have knowledge and an understanding of U.S. history and government (civics)
are lowering prices always a good thing ?
Answer:
No cause you may lose money. And thats how some businesses close down.
Explanation:
Can you make a brief summary on what happened when Trump was president and claiming that the USA had the lowest mortality rate in all the countries?
How is the structure of Florida’s government similar to the structure of the federal government?
A)Both have an executive branch headed by a president.
B)Both have Supreme Court justices who serve for life
C)Both have a legislative branch with two chambers
D)Both have nine Supreme Court justices.
Answer:
i believe the answer is c
Explanation:
The structure of Florida's government shares some similarities with the structure of the federal government.Hence option C is correct .
How is the structure of Florida’s government similar to the structure of the federal government?Firstly, both have a legislative branch with two chambers - the Senate and the House of Representatives at the federal level, and the Senate and the House of Representatives at the state level. These legislative bodies are responsible for making laws and passing bills.
Secondly, both the federal government and the state of Florida have an executive branch that is headed by a president or a governor. The executive branch is responsible for enforcing laws and overseeing the day-to-day operations of government. In both cases, the president or governor is assisted by a cabinet or executive council made up of various department heads.
However, there are also some notable differences between the two systems. For instance, while the federal government has a single Supreme Court made up of nine justices who serve for life, the state of Florida has its own Supreme Court with seven justices who serve six-year terms.
In conclusion, although there are some similarities between the structure of Florida's government and the federal government, there are also some significant differences that set them apart.
Learn more about federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/22448538
#SPJ2
1. TRUE or FALSE: The constitution created only a Supreme Court, but gave
Congress the power to create other courts.
True
O False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Help will mark brainliest ty!
Answer:
Answer us cheif of state
Please help will mark brainliest
Answer:
When someone is accused of breaking a law.
Explanation:
Your welcome!
SOMEONE ANSWER PLEASE
Chose & Write out a theological truth from the list below. 1. God loves us, and made the world with us in mind.
2.God wants us to have a relationship with Him.
3.God made man and woman for each other
4.God wants us to help Him care for the earth.
5.God created everything that exists.
6.God wants us to enjoy the good things of the earth
Answer:
2
Explanation:
For me, it is like a parent-child relationship. As a parent, I want my kids to have an open relationship. I want them to trust me without any hesitations. I want them to tell me everything they feel, want and think. I want us to be open to each other. Love each other.Which group was the last to receive full voting rights in U.S. elections?
A)Legal immigrants 18 years and older
B)U.S. citizens aged 18-20 years
C)Native-American women
D)African-American men
Answer:
B)U.S. citizens aged 18-20 years
Explanation:
The last group to receive full voting rights in U.S. elections is United States citizens aged 18-20 years.
This was passed through the Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It was passed by the United States Congress in 1971.
African-American men earned the right to vote in 1870 through the fifteenth amendment
Native Americans, whether women or men were granted the right to vote in 1924
Legal immigrants such as the Chinese were given the rights to vote in 1943 through Magnuson Act.
11. During the debate over the Constitution and whether to add a Bill of Rights, what would’ve been the point of view of an anti-federalist? *
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
Help please- I’ll luv you forever
Answer
B THE ANSWER IS B
Please help will mark brainliest
A. The bill of right
I’m like 95% sure
Homicidal Poisoning: Angels of Death
1. Explain why it is difficult to know exactly how many people are poisoned,
2. According to the article, which poison is often chosen by murderers and why?
3. Who are 'angels of death and how do they frequently avoid being discovered?
4. Explain how Donald Harvey was eventually caught.
5. Despite being accused and convicted of previous poisonings, how did Michael Swango continue to work in the healthcare industry? Who eventually helped put an end to Swango's
crimes?
6. Why was the Elfren Saldivar case an embarrassment for law enforcement officials?
7. Why don't cases that involve 'angels of death tend to make bigger headlines in the news?
Picking the Poison: The Story of Forensic Medicine
1. Discuss why arsenic was called the 'inheritance powder".
2. Who were Charles Norris and Alexander Gettler and how did they change the field of forensic science?
3. Who were the Radium Girls and how did they die?
Answer:
Homicidal Poisoning: Angels of Death
1. Explain why it is difficult to know exactly how many people are poisoned.
Most of the deaths are classified as natural.
2. According to the article, which poison is often chosen by murderers and why?
Arsenic the is poison often chose by murders because it's readily available and tasteless.
3. Who are “angels of death” and how do they frequently avoid being discovered?
They are the hospital patients who are elderly, or already ill. They avoid being discovered because the death of an old or gravely ill patient is by definition, a natural death.
4. Explain how Donald Harvey was eventually caught.
By him poisoning John Powell who was recovering from a motorcycle accident. Victims of fatal traffic accidents must be autopsied, under Ohio law. Forensic Pathologist ordered toxicology tests that revealed John had died from a lethal dose of cyanide. Mr. Harvey was the last person to see John alive, and John would be the last person Mr. Harvey killed.
5. Despite being accused and convicted of previous poisonings, how did Michael Swango continue to work in the healthcare industry? Who eventually helped put an end to Swango’s crimes?
Michael continued to work in the healthcare industry by five of his co-workers at the children's hospital getting sick after eating fast food, bought by Michael. The hospital conducted an internal investigation that cleared Michael of the wrongdoing. FBI agents arrested Michael for forging document that had led to his employment at a VA hospital in Long Island.
6. Why was the Elfren Saldivar case an embarrassment for law enforcement officials?
Because the police had not done their homework prior to the interrogation, the detectives had missed an opportunity. They had to arrest Elfren without probable cause, or release him when he just admitted to killing fifty people. They ended up letting him go.
7. Why don’t cases that involve “angels of death” tend to make bigger headlines in the news?
The cases didn't make the news because there was no money, blood, and no glamour. The victims were either old and/or sick.
Picking the Poison: The Story of Forensic Medicine
1. Discuss why arsenic was called the “inheritance powder”.
Because so many people used it to get to the fortune they couldn't wait for anymore.
2. Who were Charles Norris and Alexander Gettler and how did they change the field of forensic science?
Charles was the first chief medical examiner in New York City. He wanted to change the criminal justice system. He believed that there could not be good criminal detection unless it marched hand in hand with good science. Alexander Gettler was the father of toxicology.
3. Who were the Radium Girls and how did they die?
The Radium girls painted their watch dials. After a couple of years of them painting their watch dials, they started dying in bizarre and mysterious ways. Their jaws literally crumbled.
You're welcome! ;)
Answer:
They are classified as nature. In most of these cases there are no outward signs of the poison
Explanation:
1} What is the difference between civil law and criminal Law?
2. What type of damages can you recover in intentional torts?
3. What are the two ways you can protect intellctual property?
4, What are the defenses to intentional Torts ?
5. Why is defamation lawsuit difficult to win ?
Answer:
Civil law refers to law governing disputes between private parties. In civil cases, the plaintiff sues the defendant to obtain compensation for some wrong that the defendant has allegedly done the plaintiff.Criminal Law
It’s a crime to make unauthorized and harmful physical contact with another person (battery). In fact, it’s a crime even to threaten such contact (assault). Criminal law prohibits and punishes wrongful conduct, such as assault and battery, murder, robbery, extortion, and fraud. In criminal cases, the plaintiff—the party filing the complaint—is usually a government body acting as a representative of society.
Explanation:
I have no explanation sorry I hope this was helpful
Answer:
here...
Explanation:
1- Criminal law cases are only conducted through the criminal court system. In contrast, civil laws deal with the private rights of individuals. Civil laws are applied when an individual has had his or her rights violated or when individuals have disputes with other individuals or organizations.
2- Intentional torts can allow for punitive damages, since society wishes to deter its members from intentionally harming each other. Proof of wrongful intent is required to recover. To recover in a negligence case, the person bringing the claim must have suffered actual harm as a result of the defendant's actions.
3- Keep a record of almost everything related. Keep it under scrutiny.
4- Self defense and defense of others.
Defense of property.
Consent.
Necessity.
5- When it comes to lawsuits, a defamation case can be very challenging. For example, unless you hire an attorney who works on a pro bono basis, this type of lawsuit can be costly. The reason for this is that to win, there is a lot of fact-finding involved, which often requires the assistance of an expert.
Dictatorship does not allow citizens to participate in elections