Did the Congress Party
represent equally all of India? Why or why not?
Answer:
Yes, it did, because it represented a secular and igualitarian force for all Indians, despite their religion or social status.
Explanation:
The Indian National Congress, also known as the Congress Party, is one of six political parties in India, one of the two major parties in the country. It is considered to be social liberal and secular, while the Bharatiya Janata Party stands for a conservative orientation and Hindu nationalism.
The Congress Party was founded in 1885 and is one of the oldest democratic parties in the world. It was the leading movement in the Indian struggle for independence. For a long time it was the dominant political party in India and most of its prime ministers and presidents came from its ranks.
The Congress Party has traditionally been considered the great integrative force in the Indian party landscape. From the very beginning, she emphasized the secular, religion-neutral character of the Indian state - in contrast to neighboring Pakistan, which defined itself as the "Islamic State", and also in contrast to the Hindu nationalists, who called for the Indian state to be founded on the Hindu majority culture.
Explain Odysseus success in takin the suitors by surprise. What is the of Odysseus speech in lines 34-40? Explain why Eurymachus responds to Odysseus?
Answer: 1.)Explain Odysseus success in takin the suitors by surprise: he fought easily with no weapons and it shows that he is the best warrior on ithaca.
2.)What is the of Odysseus speech in lines 34-40?; His speech shows why he is going to kill the suitors in that he is angry they tried to marry Penelope and take his place as king
Explanation:
In what way did Christopher Columbus fail to meet concerning his voyage in 1492
Answer:
He did not get tio India,and therefore did not make a trade route to Inida,as he set out to do.But the Americas were rich,so no one really minded.
Explanation:
He did not get to India,and therefore did not make a trade route to Inida,as he set out to do.But the Americas were rich,so no really minded
who was the 13th president of the united states
Answer:
Millard Fillmore was
Answer: The 13th president of the United States of America was a man named Millard Fillmore.
Analyze the differences between these two maps. Describe what differences you see and, using your knowledge of history, infer what caused these changes.
identify some of
Jefferson's ideas for making the United States a great nation.
Answer:
jefforson wanted money and to be happy,
Explanation:
that why he became presididnt
Trade was VERY important in the Aztec Empire. Imagine that you were one of the Aztec merchants. Write a journal entry describing your day at the market. Explain in detail what items you bought and sold and who you traded with.
Answer:
Answered below
Explanation:
The Aztec empire from around the 1300s to 1the 1500s CE. Trade was a major part of our empire's economy. As an Aztec merchant, I traded everything. Many of my products were from agriculture and farming. Our farmers grew corn, tobacco, pepper, beans and avocado. Apart from agricultural products, I traded jewellery, wood and medicine. Our means of exchange was by barter using different currencies. We traveled far distances across lands and waters to obtain goods and we were well respected in the empire.
Our marketplace was called the Tianquiztli. We traded to the Mayans and other surrounding neighbors of our empire.
Why are women disrespected in some countries?
Answer:
because people believe they are weak
Explain how wealth related to food and meals
Answer:
In order to eat you need money. Money can be the answer to a lot of things, sadly, but food is the most important. Being wealthy most likely means you get fancier meals. However, if you do happen to be living on the streets some kind people might give food to you in an act of kindness. So, in conclusion wealth is how you get your nutrients and necessities.
Answer:
Less money = less food. The slaves starve more, but they were still fed to keep them alive for slavery.
Explanation:
What happened in the decade following the passage of the Immigration Act of 1990?
A) By 2000, Asian immigrants made up a third of the population of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California.
B) The government stopped the flow of illegal immigrants by penalizing employers who hired them.
C) During the 1990s, immigration to the United States declined by a record 40 percent.
D) The period from the 1990s to the 2000s saw the largest numbers of immigrants in the country’s history.
Answer:
D. The period from the 1990s to the 2000s saw the largest numbers
of immigrants in the country's history
Explanation:
It is what it is
Answer:
in 2000, a third or more of the residents of texas, new mexico, arizona, and california were lations
Explanation:
gradpoint
Was U.S. involvement in Chile during the Cold War positive or negative?
Answer:
Positive
Explanation: As with most things in US history err on the side of the US being right. they provided funding, supported a military coup, and helped overthrow their government. this steered them further from the soviets. hope this helped.
The US constitution addresses which of the following issues
How did Hoovervilles show the distain Americans had towards the federal government?
Answer:
Hooverville is a term that appeared in the USA in the early 1930s, which referred to small settlements consisting of tents and shacks that thousands of Americans were forced to live in after they lost their homes and jobs as a result of the Great Depression.
The name of these settlements was given “in honor” of Herbert Hoover, the US president, elected shortly before the crisis, who held office for most of his life, whose government was accused by many sections of the population of the crisis. These settlements thus demonstrated a notorious resentment on the part of the American people towards their rulers, especially their President, whom they blamed for their economic situation and their lack of opportunities.
Think About It: Did the South truly support the idea of “states’ rights?” Why or why not?
PLS DONT plagiarize!!!
Answer:
Yes, one of the reasons they seceded from america was because they viewed the African-american liberation as a gross undermining of states rights being overridden
Explanation:
In 1 John 4:4, who is the person "that is in the world"?
1. Satan
2. Jesus
3. your old sin nature
4. your Christian character
Answer:
3.
Explanation:
it isn't Jesus because John is referencing that Jesus/God is greater than. Satan would be just a trick because if it was Satan, he would be directly referenced. Your christian character could be the answer, but looking into the context surrounding 1 John 4:4, your old sin nature makes more sense.
During the American revolution,who were the loyalists and what were they fighting for ?
Answer:
Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War. They were opposed by the "Patriots", who supported the revolution.
They fought for the British not out of loyalty to the Crown, but from a desire for freedom, which the British promised them in return for their military service.
Brainliest PLSSS
During the American Revolutionary War, loyalists were American colonists who remained devoted to the British Crown. The "Patriots," who supported the revolution, opposed them. They fought for a variety of reasons, including devotion to the British Crown.
The Loyalists, commonly referred to as Tories, were those who supported the British Crown and opposed the revolutionary movement for American independence during the American Revolution. They fought out of loyalty to the British Crown, the defense of pre-existing social and economic systems, attachments to their cultures and ethnic groups, and fear of reprisals.
The Loyalists were not a uniform group, and they had a variety of goals. While some Loyalists actively participated in the war alongside British soldiers, others supported them in non-combat capacities. Following the American Revolution, Loyalists encountered several difficulties, such as property expropriation and, in certain cases, forced emigration to areas governed by the British.
Learn more about loyalists, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11224663
#SPJ4
what was lincoln's greatest objective
Answers: Was to preserve the Union rather than concentrate on the issue of slavery. Lincoln was prepared to take any actions to save the Union regardless of the slaves being held and laboring in the South.
Hope it helps.
Give an example of laissez faire and populism of today.
Answer:
Examples of laissez-faire transactions that the government leaves alone include regulations, tariffs, subsidies, and privileges
Explanation:
What is bushido and why was it important in the life of a samurai?
Answer:
Briefly, in Japanese, Bushido means the way of warriors.
It is important for a samurai because it is a collection of many terms and ideals which defined his life and style.
Hope this helps!
:)
URGENT!! PLEASE HELP.
Answer:
1)From what i could see i would interpret this as when one nation gets involved all their allies jump in also. You could also say that this ends in a long chain with each one going after the other. ally, then opposing ally, then ally, etc.
2)Source A tells you that when someone messes with one of them everyone else comes out of the wood works to fight too.
Define Forced Recruitment
Which of the following regions did not see significant Islamic expansion?
A) India
B) North Africa
C) Southern Asia
D) Northern Europe
Answer:
Northern Europe.
Explanation:
Because the other regions are very religious and very much believe in their God and religions.
Answer:
D) Northern Europe
Explanation:
Northern Europe was mostly Christian, while the Islamic Empire expanded throughout Asia and Africa
Who was Dred Scott?
an enslaved person who sued for his freedom
an abolitionist who escaped slavery as a boy
an abolitionist who attacked proslavery settlers
a slaveholder who was sued by an enslaved worker
Answer:
A) an enslaved person who sued for his freedom
Answer: n enslaved person who sued for his freedom
Explanation:
Which country did Germany take over after the Munich Conference? Why?
Answer:
MRCORRECT has answered the question
Explanation:
Munich Agreement, (September 30, 1938), settlement reached by Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy that permitted German annexation of the Sudetenland, in western Czechoslovakia.
What led to the collapse of the Soviet Union
Answer:
Gorbachev's decision to allow elections with a multi-party system and create a presidency for the Soviet Union began a slow process of democratization that eventually destabilized Communist control and contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Answer:
Economic downfall, political upheaval
Explanation:
Policy reform by Gorbachev who was the then Secretary General of the Communist party in 1985 saw a promotion of a policy called of Openness(Glasnost) and restructuring (perestroika); these policy created room for a critism and democratic uprising- there was lost of government control of the media in the process.
The war with Afghanistan which met a stalement with opposition from the US supporting the Afghans also brought about a weakening of their army.
In terms of Economic the economic system dwindled interms of fall of oil price from $120 to about $20; the USSR was reckoned as a major exporter of oil and gas then. This did not bring about sudden collapse but contributed. The well funding of the military in an unrational fashion of a dwindling economic promulgated by not well apportioning resources to empower would be entrepreneurs and small scale business also climatised to the fall of USSR.
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
a “good emperor”
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Since there are no options available. The answer is one of the five "good emperor's" which are:
1. Hadrian, (117 - 138 CE) is one of the "good emperor", he helped made Roman laws easier to understand. He also built a wall to keep out warlike people who lived in northern Britain. He built the pantheon- a temple to all gods and created postal system.
2. Marcus Aurelius, (161 - 180 CE) is a philosopher and writer, also considered as a good emperor, who united the empire economically, he spent time defending rome and its borders. His death ended the Pax Romana
3. Antoninus Pius (138 - 161 CE) is also a good emperor, who passed laws to help orphans
4. Trajan (98 - 117 CE) is considered to be the first emperor noted to not be italian and the last emperor to add land, known as one of the five "good emperor". He gave money to help poor parents raise and educate their children, and empire was largest under his rule
5. Nerva (96–98 CE) is also considered as a good emperor, who revised taxes
The word that best fits "good emperor" is a. Hadrian
Hadrian was considered to be one of the five good emperors of Rome because of his many achievements which included:
sponsoring the literal arts constructing structures such as Hadrian's Wall in Britain Revived various citiesHadrian also continued to keep Rome peaceful just as his predecessors had done since Augustus founded the Roman empire.
In conclusion, Hadrian is therefore the best option for a good emperor.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/3459372.
Options for this question include:
a. Hadrian
b. Caligula
c. Nero
d. Commodus
why were the 13th 14th and 15th amendments passed?
Explanation:
The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, were designed to ensure equality for recently emancipated slaves. The 13th Amendment banned slavery and all involuntary servitude, except in the case of punishment for a crime.
True or False: The Nazi army was depleted by 500,000 by 1943 because of Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Thank me later :)
How did the artist portray Lincoln as under the devil rule?
Douglass wrote about his meeting with Lincoln almost 20 years
later. How might the passage of time affect Douglass’s memory of
Lincoln and his evaluation of the Emancipation Proclamation?
Answer:
Because of the long time between the two events, there would be possibility of error in exact words and perception of its meaning.
Explanation:
After the twenty long years Douglass might not have a clear picture of what Lincoln had said. There is a high possibility that after this much long time he may have subconsciously or unconsciously modified what Lincoln had said a little to be what he wanted to hear. It is really difficult to recall the same words or meaning from an event, after twenty years of the event actually occurred.