what is an issue in cybersecurity that has two arguable sides assignment 1-6journal from issue to persuasion

The recognition of paralegalism as a separate legal occupation dates back to the 1960s. Prior to this time, the role of a paralegal was performed by legal secretaries, clerks, and other administrative personnel who assisted lawyers in their work.

However, as the practice of law became more complex, the demand for skilled and specialized support staff grew, leading to the recognition of paralegalism as a separate and distinct profession.

One of the key factors that led to the recognition of paralegalism was the increasing need for cost-effective legal services. Lawyers and law firms were seeking ways to increase efficiency and reduce costs, and they recognized that delegating certain tasks to paralegals could help to achieve this goal.

Additionally, the rise of the consumer movement in the 1960s led to an increased demand for legal services among the general public, which further increased the need for paralegals to assist with the workload of lawyers.

The first formal programs for paralegals were established in the 1960s, with the goal of providing specialized training to individuals who wanted to work in this new and rapidly growing field. These programs typically included coursework in legal research, legal writing, and other relevant areas, and they were designed to prepare students for the unique challenges of working as paralegals.

The recognition of paralegalism as a separate legal occupation was further solidified by the American Bar Association (ABA), which adopted guidelines for the education and training of paralegals in the 1970s. The ABA's guidelines set the standard for the profession and helped to ensure that paralegals received the education and training they needed to provide high-quality support to lawyers and their clients.

To know more about refer paralegal to-

brainly.com/question/25507890#

#SPJ11

The FBI maintains CODIS, a national DNA database bank that enables state and local crime laboratories to retain and analyze DNA profiles from evidence found at crime scenes and from criminals who have been found guilty.

The National DNA Index System, or NDIS, is a component of CODIS, the national level, which contains the DNA profiles provided by participating forensic laboratories at the federal, state, and municipal levels. Incorporated in October 1998 was the NDIS. According to state legislation, DNA samples taken from some arrestees and convicted felons must be received, processed, and analyzed by the DNA Database Section. The Combined DNA Index System, a database, is then used to store the DNA profiles. A digital code based on the nomenclature of the information is used to save it. every STR. For each profile in the database, there were initially 6 STR markers in 1995, 10 markers in 1999, and 16 core markers and a gender identifier in 2014. A public database of information about human genes, clones, STSs, polymorphisms, and maps is called The Genome Database (GDB; http://www.gdb.org). The entries in the GDB are closely linked to those in other databases, such as the sequence databases, OMIM, and the Mouse Genome Database, as well as to citations in the literature.

Learn more about database here :

https://brainly.com/question/10159101

#SPJ4

The reason why the officer presume the guilt of 14-year-old santiago ventura is because Ventura answered "yes" to all of the officers questions

Ventura's limited command of Spanish caused him to just reply "yes" to every inquiry from the officer, which made the officer assume guilt. Ventura was found guilty of murder and given a 10-to-life sentence after a trial in which his attorney refused to allow him to testify due to his language barriers.

Because 14-year-old Santiago Ventura responded "yes" to all of the police's questions, the officer assumes Ventura is guilty.

Learn more about officer at:

https://brainly.com/question/10097136

#SPJ1

Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) are a type of stock option offered to employees by their corporation as a form of compensation. In order to qualify as an ISO, certain requirements must be met by both the corporation and the employee receiving the option.

Here are the requirements that must be met in order for the options to qualify as ISOs:

Corporation requirements: The corporation granting the option must be a domestic corporation, meaning it is incorporated in the United States. Additionally, the corporation must not have more than a certain number of shareholders and must not be an investment company.

Stock requirements: The stock received from the option must be issued by the corporation granting the option and must be unrestricted, meaning that it can be sold on the open market.

Exercise price: The exercise price of the option, which is the price at which the employee can purchase the stock, must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted.

Holding period: In order to receive favorable tax treatment, the employee must hold the stock received from the option for at least two years from the date the option was granted and one year from the date the option was exercised.

Limitations on the number of options granted: There are limits on the number of options that can be granted to an individual employee in a given year.

By meeting these requirements, the corporation can offer its employees ISOs as a form of compensation that can provide potential tax benefits for the employees.

For more about Corporation:

https://brainly.com/question/29098875

#SPJ11

Answer:

The three main ways that the Constitution protects against tyranny are Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances. The Checks and Balances is included in the Constitution to protect the United States from tyranny.

Explanation:

The executive summary of juvenile injustice provides important arguments about the best way to handle juveniles who commit serious crimes in the criminal justice system. It highlights the need for a more rehabilitative approach rather than a punishment-focused one.

The report also emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive and individualized approach to addressing juvenile crime, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. It notes that many juveniles who commit serious crimes have underlying mental health and substance abuse issues that need to be addressed in order to prevent recidivism.

Additionally, the report highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of juvenile crime, such as poverty, abuse, and neglect. It notes that these issues can contribute to criminal behavior in juveniles and need to be addressed in order to prevent further offending.

To learn more about Juvenile Justice, visit-

https://brainly.com/question/21931423

#SPJ11

When the law requires mens rea, prosecutor shall prove the intent of the accused.

One of the most important elements of criminal law is mens rea. It is the basis upon which a prosecutor can hold one as guilty for most offences.

Criminal intent is referred to as mens rea. "Guilty mind" is the literal translation from Latin of the term mens rea..

The legal requirement for a particular defendant to be found guilty of a specific offence is known as a mens rea.

The mens rea requirement is based on the notion that one must have a guilty mindset and be conscious of their behaviour; nevertheless, a defendant need not be aware that their actions are unlawful in order to be found guilty of a crime.

The accused should be aware of the "facts that make his action match the criteria of the offence," instead.

The correct option is D.

To know more about mens rea, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10513615

#SPJ4

He meets the criteria for being considered a trader because he has sold the property he bought at the auction 33 times, thus the city is correct.

An exchange of goods or services for a fixed sum of money is referred to as a sale. To put it another way, a sale is any action that involves giving the buyer possession of a good or service in return for money.

In the framework of routine business operations, any exchanges of money or value for the right to receive a good or a service are seen as sales. Sales, as used in accounting, are the funds received by a business through the sale of goods or services.

To learn more about sales  revenue,

https://brainly.com/question/29436143

#SPJ4

The correct question is-

During the week, Adonis would buy property at auctions and then sell it to others on weekends at one of his garage sales. As a result of his holding garage sales on 33 consecutive weekends, the city in which he lived claimed he was a merchant and therefore had to pay sales tax.

Is the city correct?

Usually, receiving the tax refund does not take longer than twenty-one business days after the collecting authorities have accepted it.

The tax refund may be understood as the amount that is to be paid to the individual assessee for the incomes he or she makes during the previous year. If the tax liability of the assessee is lesser than the tax he or she actually pays, then the difference amount is to be paid as a forming part of their tax refund. When accepted, the tax refund does not take more than twenty-one days to be processed and paid to the person.

Learn more about tax refund here:

https://brainly.com/question/9446349

#SPJ4

Hess's Law states that the heat absorbed or released during a chemical reaction is the same, regardless of the number of steps or the sequence of the reaction. This law is based on the principle of energy conservation, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.

The experiment to illustrate Hess's Law involves determining the heat change that occurs in a chemical reaction by using two different methods. First, the heat change is determined for the reaction as it occurs in one step. Then, the reaction is broken down into several steps and the heat change is determined for each step.

The total heat change for all the steps is then calculated and compared to the heat change obtained from the one-step reaction. If Hess's Law is correct, the two results should be the same.

To read more about hess' law, visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30024746

#SPJ11

The major Strength of Texas constitution is its clarity and major weakness is  how much money can be spent by state officials each year.

The Texas Constitution is one of the oldest in the United States. It was written on May 3, 1876 and amended on December 10, 1883. The current version has been revised over the last several decades and is currently under revision again.

The Texas Constitution is a model for many other states' constitutions due to its relatively short length, which makes it easy to read through in order to understand what is happening in Texas. It also contains many different types of provisions that can be used by citizens when they're trying to protect their rights or freedoms.

The strengths of the Texas Constitution include its clarity, which is an important quality for any law that people need to follow. The constitution also provides people with protection against government overreach since it requires all laws be passed through the legislature before being implemented by those in power (the governor).

The constitution also sets out specific weakness on how much money can be spent by state officials each year, which means that there are fewer opportunities for corruption or abuse of power because there are clear limits set out by law rather than simply allowing politicians unlimited funds at their disposal whenever they want them (which would allow them

To know more about  Texas constitution refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27962072#

#SPJ11

Answer: A decrease in demand will cause the equilibrium price to fall; quantity supplied will decrease. An increase in supply, all other things unchanged, will cause the equilibrium price to fall; quantity demanded will increase. A decrease in supply will cause the equilibrium price to rise; quantity demanded will decrease.

The Constitution's Framers participated in the Constitutional Convention as delegates and contributed to the document's drafting. The Federalist papers did not have a significant impact on the Constitution's framers.

From May 14 to September 17, 1787, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, hosted the Constitutional Convention. Making decisions about how America would be governed was the event's main goal. Many of the attendees had considerably more ambitious intentions even though the Convention's ostensible purpose was to update the old Articles of Confederation. The purpose of the Constitutional Convention, a formal assembly held in 1787, was to draft the United States' constitution. The document that serves as the nation's foundational law is the United States Constitution. In Philadelphia between May 25 and September 17, 1787, fifty-five delegates would not only completely reject the Articles of Confederation.

Learn more about Constitutional Convention here

https://brainly.com/question/14018105

#SPJ4

Some models only contain the first 5 levels of the continuum and divide these skills into empty hand, soft control, and intermediate weapon approaches.

An important subject in law enforcement is the force continuum. The force continuum, as its name implies, is used to determine the right amount of force to utilize in a certain situation. While some circumstances only call for the use of limited force, others necessitate the use of lethal force. Therefore, the force continuum determines the precise level of force to be delivered.

You will be given situational, dynamic questions during the oral board test regarding how you would respond in a particular situation. You'll be required to respond in a responsible, proportionate, and measured way.

Police personnel use the force continuum, a spectrum of force that ranges from Level 1 to Level 5, to decide how to respond to a scenario. Its purpose is to plan a systematic and convincing answer to an offered, frequently complex response. For instance, it would not be acceptable for a police officer to shoot and kill a bystander for disobeying obvious commands. Always respond in a manner commensurate with how serious the offense was.

To learn more about force continuum from given link

https://brainly.com/question/26276607

#SPJ4

The level of competency Stanley work in NEMSMA is a managing officer. Thus the correct option is B.

Competency is referred to skills which differentiated a person from others. The competency of an individual decides the effciency of performing any task in order to delegate any work.

A manager is a person who oversees a project and is accountable for allocating resources, monitoring the project's development, and ensuring that it is completed on schedule in order to fulfill the organization's mission and goals.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about  managers, here:

brainly.com/question/29023210

#SPJ1

A challenge for cause needs a court to be convinced that a prospective juror has a bias that precludes impartiality; a peremptory challenge, on the other hand, gives counsel enormous freedom by enabling the dismissal of jurors without explanation or evidence of potential impartiality.

The court ruled in Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712 (1986), that a peremptory challenge cannot be used to discriminate against and remove potential jurors based on gender, color, ethnicity, or religion.

Implied bias is the process through which the court determines if a juror has a relationship with one of the parties in the case that would impair their capacity to sit as an impartial juror.

Learn more about to juror

https://brainly.com/question/15359272

#SPJ4

By looking at the image given below, it may be stated that the U.S. Foreign Policy illustrated in the cartoon in order to prevent further European colonization in the west hemisphere. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The European colonization has been ideally seen among the most hot issues of the past few centuries, especially because of the significant events that took place as a result. In a response to the same, a cartoon, as portrayed in the image, was used to indicate that the Europeans must stop colonizing further in the Western Hemisphere.

Learn more about European colonization here:

https://brainly.com/question/12624227

#SPJ4

Missing options and image are added below.

A. prevent further European colonization in the Western Hemisphere

B. deter Spain from inciting revolution in former U.S. colonies

C. encourage European powers to invest in Latin America

D. keep the war between France and Spain from spreading to Latin America

The Marbury v. Madison (1803) case, which founded the doctrine of judicial scrutiny, was a historic victory by the Marshall Court that reinforced the federal government. Due to this ruling, the judicial branch now possesses the authority to find parliamentary acts to be illegitimate.

The Marshall Court was crucial in creating the current democratic union of the US government. Chief Justice John Marshall, who presided over the court from 1801 to 1835, oversaw a string of rulings that gradually enhanced the federal president's authority and established the concept of legal challenge.

Marbury v. Madison (1803), a case that founded the trial court principle, is perhaps one of the most well-known judgements of the Marshall Court. The Judiciary Act of 1789's clause in question was ruled illegal by the Supreme Court in this case, giving the court the jurisdiction to examine the activities of the other arms of government. With the powers of each branch properly delineated and subject to democratic accountability, this choice helped to assure that the central government would remain a constrained one.

To know more about Marshall Court Federal Power visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8501199

#SPJ4

One major hurdle litigants face is proving that they have suffered an injury that is directly caused by a violation of the Endangered Species Act. For example, if a litigant is trying to protect an endangered species, they must show that they have been directly and significantly impacted by the defendant's actions that harm the species.

This requirement makes it difficult for individuals to bring a lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act, as they must demonstrate that their interests are directly tied to the protection of the endangered species.

The Endangered Species Act is a federal law passed in the United States in 1973 to protect species that are in danger of extinction. This law provides various legal protections for endangered species, such as habitat preservation and restriction of commercial use. However, litigants, or individuals who bring a lawsuit to court, have faced various challenges when it comes to standing to bring a lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act.

Another challenge litigants face is that the Endangered Species Act is designed to protect species, not individual animals. This means that litigants must show that the defendant's actions have a significant impact on the overall population of the species, rather than just a few individual animals. This requirement can be difficult to prove, as it may require complex scientific data and analysis.

Lastly, the standing requirement for litigants under the Endangered Species Act is often interpreted narrowly, making it difficult for individuals and organizations to bring a lawsuit to protect endangered species. This narrow interpretation of standing can limit the ability of litigants to hold violators of the Endangered Species Act accountable and protect endangered species from harm.

To know more about endangered species refer to-

brainly.com/question/10415903#

#SPJ11

The transaction costs associated with figuring out and organising communication amongst the fascinated parties would be prohibitive.

Traffic congestion is an example of a terrible externality that takes place when too many drivers use a road at the same time. This creates lengthy site visitors jams, which can motive drivers to waste time and gas and additionally lead to elevated air pollution as automobiles take a seat stationary in the equal spot.

This is additionally acknowledged as a traffic jam. Congestion may additionally result from a minimize in capacity, for instance accidents on the avenue or roads being closed. Bad avenue layouts can additionally prevent capacity. Increased traffic, for example by way of many vehicles leaving a sports stadium at the same time, can also motive congestion.

Learn more about traffic congestion here:

Note that ” If Sean were to file a discrimination claim, original jurisdiction to hear his claim would rest with "The Washington State Human Rights Commission, a Washington state court, the Federal District Court for the District of Washington." (Option A)

You can submit a Charge of Discrimination if you feel you have been mistreated against at work because of your race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information.

Direct proof is the most effective technique to demonstrate discrimination. Statements by managers or supervisors that explicitly tie the detrimental action taken upon you to your protected class status are direct proof of discrimination.

Learn more about Legal Claims;
https://brainly.com/question/30061988
#SPJ1

The law creates a system to resolve the disputes of the parties by recognizing the legal rights as well as the interests of the involved parties.

The legal rights may be termed or referred to as the rights that are provided to a specific set of person under the lawful documents related to the same. These rights are completely regulated, and provide protection to those who hold them. Moreover, the legal rights are also under the scrutiny of the government bodies, formed specifically for the purpose.

Learn more about legal rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/28024586

#SPJ4

Complete question

the law creates a system to resolve disputes by recognizing legal _______ and interests of the parties involved.

Explanation:

The insanity defense is a legal concept that allows defendants to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions because they were legally insane at the time of the crime. The defense is based on the idea that individuals who are suffering from a mental illness or disability should not be punished for criminal acts that were a direct result of their illness or disability.

There is debate over the use of the insanity defense and whether or not it should be allowed. Some argue that it is necessary to provide a mechanism for individuals who are mentally ill to receive the appropriate treatment and support rather than punishment. However, others believe that the insanity defense is too often abused and used as a loophole for criminals to avoid punishment.

As for the requirement of all states to adopt "guilty but mentally ill" or "guilty but insane" statutes, it is a complex issue. On one hand, having consistent standards across the country could provide clearer guidelines and more predictable outcomes. On the other hand, states may have different needs and priorities, and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective.

It is also worth noting that the insanity defense is just one aspect of the criminal justice system and addressing broader issues such as access to mental health resources, support for individuals with mental illness, and the role of the criminal justice system in addressing mental health may be more effective in reducing crime and improving outcomes for those who are mentally ill.

In conclusion, the insanity defense is a complex and controversial issue, with arguments for and against its use. While the idea of having consistent standards across all states may seem appealing, it is important to consider the unique needs and priorities of each state when making decisions about the criminal justice system.

The political action committees are known to have a heavy influence over the Congress by the way of funding the donations for supporting the federal or non-federal officers in an election.

The establishment or founding of the political action committees is done with the primary intention of developing an official governing body that looks after the candidates before and during an election. It also collects funds from others, which it further donates to fund the candidates that are a part of the political election that take place.

Learn more about political action committees here:

https://brainly.com/question/29615436

#SPJ4

During pretrial activities, the judge assumes the role of an impartial decision maker.

Impartial decision maker refers to a person who makes decisions objectively and without bias or prejudice. The decision maker must not be influenced by personal, emotional, financial, or other interests and must base their decisions solely on the facts and the law. The impartiality of the decision maker is essential in ensuring the fairness and integrity of the decision-making process.

The judge's main responsibility is to ensure that the legal process is fair, efficient and in compliance with the law. The judge reviews and rules on motions, oversees the discovery process, and makes decisions regarding the admissibility of evidence. The judge also manages the scheduling of the trial and ensures that all parties are prepared for trial.

The judge must remain neutral and not show bias towards either side, and must make decisions based solely on the evidence and the law. The judge's role is critical in ensuring that the trial is fair and that the rights of all parties are protected.

To learn more about Prejudice :

https://brainly.com/question/30433571

The role of Negotiator is one that the judge plays during pre-trial proceedings.

Its ensemble and outstanding performances make The Negotiator a compelling action thriller. At the peak of their game, Jackson and Spacey are a sight to behold on television. A experienced police negotiator who is accused of corruption and murder takes hostages in a government building in a last-ditch effort to establish his innocence and buy himself the time to do it. Both inside and outside of themselves, they want peace. They are urged to create the idyllic, tranquil world by their type 1 wing. In an effort to divert their attention and ward off uncomfortable feelings, negotiators engage substantially in routine. As he felt that Jedi should not be soldiers, Obi-Wan earned the nickname "The Negotiator" and advocated negotiation throughout The Clone Wars.

Learn more about Negotiator here

https://brainly.com/question/18152471

#SPJ4

The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have with them as non-involvement in European affairs.

George Washington was a devout advocate ofnon-involvement in the affairs of other countries especially European powers. This is why indeed though the French monarchy supported the Americans in gaining independence from the British, when they were overthrown in the French Revolution, the Americans under Washington didn't get involved. Washington allowed

it stylish to stay down from long term engagements with other nations and to maintain impartiality similar that the stylish policy can be objectively followed.

Learn more about rule of conduct at

https://brainly.com/question/19593536

#SPJ4

Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government wasn't above the law.

It sought to help the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself. The Magna Carta was the document that was used to set out the type of government that's used in the United States moment. With the conception of representative government and the idea of trial by jury, it allowed the people to have a say-so in their own governance, rather of being forced to assent to the vagrancies of a landed quality who may not have had the stylish interests of their subjects in mind.

Learn more about Magna Carta at

https://brainly.com/question/8044944

#SPJ4

Bashar al-Assad who is the president of syria who is Syria's 19th president.

Bashar al-Assad, president of Syria since 2000, was born on September 11, 1965, in Damascus, Syria. His father, Afiz al-Assad, who had ruled Syria since 1971, was succeeded by him. Although there were early expectations that Bashar al-presidency Assad's would usher in a period of democratic reform and economic restoration, he primarily upheld his father's authoritarian policies. A significant rebellion in Syria that started in 2011 and turned into a civil war was faced by Assad.

Before he took power, a reform movement made tentative strides during the Damascus Spring, which resulted in the closure of Mezzeh jail and the proclamation of a comprehensive amnesty that freed hundreds of political prisoners associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. [85] However, within the year, security crackdowns started up once more.  Many experts claimed that the "old guard," or those in the government who were loyal to Assad's late father, had thwarted reform under his leadership.

To know more about Bashar al-Assad:

https://brainly.com/question/28759216

#SPJ4

Answer: The Government cannot deprive you of life, liberty, nor property.

Explanation: It is in the 5th and 14th amendment.

Horndike's law of effect involves S-R learning. According to Thorndike's Law of Effect, behavioural responses (R) that were closely followed by a positive outcome were more likely to develop into patterns and recur in response to the same stimulus (S).

The fundamental S-R framework of behavioural psychology is represented by Thorndike's learning theory, which states that associations between stimuli and responses result in learning. The characteristics and frequency of the S-R pairings influence whether these associations or "habits" are strengthened or decreased. According to Edward Thorndike's idea of "connectionism," learning is a result of the interaction between stimulus and reaction. A response is the result of a stimulus.

To learn more about behavioural, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/24565314

#SPJ4