what are the s.p.i.c.e outcomes at the end of the war production board ?

Answer:

that Americans wait to be instructed to do so before addressing a German counterpart by their first name.

Explanation:

The growth of manufacturing in the United States from 1800 to 1850 was most directly connected to large numbers of international migrants moving to northern cities. Therefore the correct option is option A.

The manufacturing sector of the US has been an essential part of the US economy since the Industrial Revolution. From the period 1800 to 1850, the manufacturing industry saw its most significant growth in the United States.

This period was when most companies began using machines to make products, allowing them to produce goods at a faster pace, a rate that the skilled workers of that period could not match.

As a result, the manufacturing industry saw a rise in productivity and profitability, with many businesses expanding their operations to meet the growing demands of the market.

During the period 1800 to 1850, large numbers of international migrants moved to northern cities and urban areas of the US. These migrants came from various parts of the world and came to the US seeking better economic opportunities.

The majority of these migrants found employment in the manufacturing industry, which was experiencing unprecedented growth. Therefore the correct option is option A.

For such more question on migrants:

https://brainly.com/question/11736875

#SPJ11

Answer: The purpose of the National Energy Act was to reduce the country's dependence on foreign oil and promote energy conservation, as well as to encourage the development of alternative energy sources such as nuclear, solar, and wind power. Therefore, option C, "Provide funding for alternate energy research" is the correct answer. The Act included measures to incentivize the use of renewable energy sources and improve energy efficiency, as well as the establishment of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to protect against oil supply disruptions. It did not involve government taking control of oil production, construction of more oil wells and drill sites, or a ban on foreign oil imports.

Explanation:

Answer: The opportunity cost represents the value of the alternative which is foregone when another alternative is chosen.

Explanation:

The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Persian Empire and the Greek city-states in the 5th century BCE.

National Unity: The Persian Wars brought the Greek city-states together and fostered a sense of national unity. Greeks from different city-states fought side by side against a common enemy, which helped to break down the traditional divisions between the various city-states.

Military Developments: The Persian Wars led to the development of new military tactics and technologies, which helped to make the Greeks more effective in battle. For example, the Greeks learned to fight in phalanxes (tight formations of soldiers), which allowed them to withstand the Persian cavalry charges.

Naval Supremacy: The Greek victory over the Persian navy at the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE gave the Greeks control of the Aegean Sea and established their naval supremacy in the region.

Learn more about Persian wars at:

https://brainly.com/question/925997

#SPJ1

The role of taxes in the founding of the United States involved the colonists' resentment towards British taxes which contributed to the American Revolution, and debates over taxation powers and responsibilities during the establishment of a new federal government

Taxes played a significant role in the founding of the United States, as the colonists' resentment towards British taxes without their representation in the British Parliament contributed to the American Revolution, and the establishment of a new federal government under the U.S. Constitution involved debates over taxation powers and responsibilities between the federal and state governments.

Learn more on taxes here;

https://brainly.com/question/25783927

#SPJ1

England became the foremost colonial power in the globe. The Great Lakes were used to conquer French forts. The war was formally ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.

What was the French and Indian War's key turning point?

The conflict started to alter when William Pitt gained charge of the military operations. He believed that England's domination of the globe depended on North America. Pitt agreed to hand over management of recruiting and supplies in exchange for a promise to reimburse them.

In the French and Indian War, the British prevailed. They took control of the area over which France claimed possession. The French mainland came under American authority. All of the nations from the east coast of North America to the Mississippi River were now under British control. The French and Indian War was ended by the signing of the Treaty of Paris in February 1763. The Brits grabbed Canada from France and Florida from Spain while giving France the right to keep its West Indian sugar islands and giving Spain Louisiana.

Learn more about French and Indian War:

https://brainly.com/question/3223999

#SPJ1

Instead of celebrating our person cultures on Heritage Day, we have embraced the theme of solidarity to emphasise how as South Africa, we are enhanced together. Heritage Day affords the ideal opportunity for us to recognize what unites us alternatively than what divides us.

On the day, exceptional speakers will encourage the youth and instruct them about the significance of their heritage. “There will also be a reward and worship session, to reward God in an African way,” he said. Xolani Jwaga encouraged the youth to costume in normal apparel on the day.Heritage Day epitomizes the cultural and ethnic range of South Africa. It serves as a reminder to South Africans to embody the spirit of uBuntu (humanity) and show love for one another—because indeed, there is Unity In Diversity.

Learn more about churches here:

Answer:

Explanation:

In the summer of 1941 A. Philip Randolph, founder of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, called for a march on Washington, D.C.,

to draw attention to the exclusion of African Americans from positions in

Civil right.

Answer:

Write an essay in which you discussed Social Darwinism and opposing views such as the Social Gospel or Settlement House movements and express your own point of view. ( MAKE SURE TO WRITE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION) ​

Explanation:

Introduction:

Social Darwinism is a term coined in the late 19th century, which refers to the application of evolutionary theory to social and economic systems. According to this theory, the strongest and fittest individuals, businesses, and nations survive and thrive, while weaker ones die off. Social Darwinism was embraced by many prominent thinkers and leaders of the time, who used it to justify their beliefs in racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. In this essay, I will discuss Social Darwinism and these opposing views, and express my own point of view on this topic.

Body:

Social Darwinism was a popular concept during the late 19th century and was used to justify racial superiority and imperialism. The theory argued that the struggle for existence applied not only to individuals but also to nations, and that the superior nations had a right to dominate the weaker ones. This idea was embraced by many European powers, who used it as a justification for their imperialistic activities in Africa and Asia. Similarly, in the United States, Social Darwinism was used to justify the exploitation of natural resources and the exploitation of workers by capitalists.

However, the Social Gospel movement emerged in response to Social Darwinism, emphasizing the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. This movement advocated for the use of Christian principles to address social problems, such as poverty, inequality, and injustice. The Social Gospel movement believed that it was the responsibility of the government and society as a whole to ensure that everyone had access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare.

Another opposing view to Social Darwinism was the Settlement House movement. Settlement houses were community centers located in urban areas, which provided services and resources to immigrant families. The movement was led by middle-class women who believed that the problems of the urban poor were caused by social, economic, and political factors. The Settlement House movement aimed to address these issues by providing education, job training, and social services to the community.

Conclusion:

Social Darwinism was a popular theory during the late 19th century, used to justify racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. While Social Darwinism is no longer a popular theory, its influence can still be seen in some political and economic policies. In my opinion, it is important to recognize that we live in a complex and interconnected world, and that cooperation and compassion are essential for creating a just and sustainable society. We must continue to work towards a society that values equality, justice, and social welfare for all.

Both sources exhibit racial and ethnic bias. (Choice c)

History is examined from a worldwide viewpoint in the branch of historical study known as world history and global history. It has been around for centuries, and notable exponents include Voltaire, Hegelian, Marx, Oswald Spengler, & Arnold J. Toynbee. In the later 20th century, the field saw a significant increase in activity. The early historians of the modern era, who produced their works in the years following World War II, tended to subscribe to the conventional belief that history started shortly after the initial written records appeared in Egypt and Mesopotamia around 5,000 years ago.

To know more about world history visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29211721

#SPJ1

Answer:

The belief that a government has the right to make public policy is known as the doctrine of popular sovereignty

Based on the information provided, the documents seem to be referring to the Hyksos, a group of horse-riding nomads who invaded and conquered Egypt in the 17th century BCE.

Hyksos were a group of horse-riding nomads who are believed to have migrated from the Levant region and settled in the eastern Nile Delta region of Egypt around 1650 BCE. They are credited with introducing the horse to Egypt, which gave them a significant military advantage over the native Egyptian army. The Hyksos conquered Memphis, the capital of Egypt, and gradually gained control over the entire country, ruling for about a century (1650-1550 BCE). However, they were eventually pushed out of Egypt by the native Egyptian pharaohs, who regained control of the country and began the New Kingdom period.

To know more about Hyksos

brainly.com/question/18897575

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Identify the word that best suits with the given sentences:

-horse riding nomads

-most likely introduced horses to Egypt

-significant military advantage over Egypt

-Captured Memphis and later gained control of all of Egypt

-gradually pushed out of Egypt

Answer:

The Roman Catholic Church

Explanation:

please give brainliest!

Answer:Ida M. Tarbell’s name would become synonymous with the term muckraker after publication of her 19-part expose of the business practices of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company that had destroyed her father’s oil business, as well as many other small oil related companies in Pennsylvania’s oil region in the 1870s

Explanation:

Answer:

So you see, never judge a book by its cover.

Explanation:

The book is wrong.

America was beginning to establish itself as a major world power at the beginning of the 1900s, and as a result, its relations with the rest of the world were changing.

The building of the Panama Canal, which was driven by three factors—military, economic, and political—was a significant development during this time. Trade between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans was made easier by the canal, which was crucial to American commerce. However, there were numerous difficulties during the canal's construction, including medical issues, disease, and a lack of labour. America was beginning to establish itself as a major world power at the beginning of the 1900s, and as a result, its relations with the rest of the world were changing.  Foreign policy under President Theodore Roosevelt was referred to as the "Big Stick" policy. It placed emphasis on the use of force to defend American interests abroad. The Monroe Doctrine's Roosevelt Corollary, which declared that the US had the right to intervene in Latin America.

To Know more about Canal Visit:

brainly.com/question/1309615

#SPJ1

The degree of separation of power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in these systems is the main distinction between them.

The relationship between the legislative as well as  executive branches at the heart of the primary system types. when a president is in power. In these regimes, the president, who serves as the chief executive, plays a very small part in the parliamentary branch. Semi-presidential systems are those that have a presidency and a prime minister. Certain parliamentary and presidential aspects are present in both of these systems. The relationship between the executive and the legislative in a presidential and a parliamentary system is another significant distinction.

To know more about parliamentary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17998186

#SPJ1

Racism in the mid-twentieth century was a pervasive problem, with African Americans and other minority groups facing discrimination in many aspects of life, including education, employment, housing, and civil rights.

Discrimination is the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the basis of race, age, or sex. It involves treating someone differently or unfairly based on certain characteristics that are irrelevant to their abilities or qualifications. Discrimination can take many forms, such as denying someone access to services, providing unequal treatment in the workplace, or refusing to rent or sell property. It is important to recognize discrimination and work to eliminate it so that everyone can be treated equally and fairly.

To learn more about discrimination

https://brainly.com/question/30373430

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Contribution                                                                                              Notes

Mining

-Discovery of gold and silver led to the rapid development of western territories

-Mining towns were established and became centers of economic activity and culture

Cattle

-The cattle industry was a major source of income for western farmers and ranchers

-Cattle drives were organized to transport cattle to markets in the East

Ranching

-The open range system allowed ranchers to graze their cattle freely on public land

-Ranchers developed new breeds of cattle that were better adapted to the harsh western climate

The Cowboy

-Cowboys played a central role in the cattle industry, driving cattle to market and caring for them on the open range

-The cowboy became a cultural icon, celebrated in popular literature and entertainment

Irrigated Farming

-Irrigation systems allowed farmers to cultivate crops in arid regions

-Farmers developed new techniques for dry farming, such as planting drought-resistant crops

Malarial swamps were widespread and claimed many lives from the biblical era until being eradicated by microbiologist Israel Kligler in 1960. Malaria is a parasitic infection that is transmitted by the bite of an infected Anopheles mosquito.

The infected mosquito carries the malaria parasite from one individual to the next. The disease is characterized by symptoms such as fever, headache, and chills. Malarial swamps were where mosquitoes breed and grow, increasing the risk of infection. Malaria was a widespread problem in ancient times, as it is now. In the biblical era, it was referred to as "the plague."

The prevalence of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia is still very high. Mosquito control measures, such as insecticide-treated bed nets and mosquito repellents, are effective at reducing the incidence of malaria. There are also anti-malaria drugs that can be used to treat infected individuals. In 1960, microbiologist Israel Kligler played an important role in the eradication of malaria. He developed a method of sterilizing male Anopheles mosquitoes using radiation.

As a result, when the males mate with females, no offspring are produced. As a result, the mosquito population is reduced. This strategy has been successful in reducing the incidence of malaria in certain regions.

For more such questions on Malarial swamps

https://brainly.com/question/14258295

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Romans reacted violently towards Christians because the early Christian belief system challenged the authority of the Roman state and threatened its stability. The Romans were a polytheistic society, and they had a long tradition of tolerating and incorporating different religions and beliefs into their society. However, the early Christians were monotheistic and believed in a single God, which was seen as a direct challenge to the Roman gods and the emperor, who was seen as a deity.

Additionally, early Christians refused to worship the emperor or participate in the state-sanctioned religious ceremonies, which were seen as essential to the maintenance of the Roman social and political order. This refusal to participate in the traditional practices of the Roman state was seen as a threat to the social fabric of Roman society, and Christians were often accused of being atheists and enemies of the state.

Furthermore, the early Christians were often associated with rebellious and subversive movements, which further heightened the suspicions of the Roman authorities. As a result, the Romans viewed Christianity as a dangerous and subversive movement that needed to be suppressed to ensure the stability and survival of the Roman state. This led to the persecution of Christians and the eventual spread of Christianity as a persecuted religion.

Answer:

Question? when an Ad Hominem attack is being used. Explain why it is an attack on personhood rather than debating a difference of policy or issue under discussion.

Explanation:

Ad Hominem is a type of fallacy in which an argument or claim is rejected by attacking the person making it rather than the actual argument itself. It is an attack on the person's character, reputation, or personal circumstances, rather than addressing the substance of their argument. Ad Hominem attacks are used to distract from the issue at hand by focusing on irrelevant personal characteristics of the person making the argument.

Ad Hominem attacks are considered to be logical fallacies because they do not address the actual merits of the argument being made. Instead, they attempt to discredit the person making the argument by attacking their character or reputation. This can be harmful to healthy discourse because it does not allow for productive discussion and can lead to personal attacks and name-calling, rather than a constructive debate on the merits of the issue at hand.

In summary, Ad Hominem attacks are attacks on personhood rather than debating a difference of policy or issue under discussion because they seek to discredit the person making the argument rather than addressing the substance of their argument. They are considered logical fallacies because they do not contribute to productive discourse and can undermine healthy debate.

Answer:

Question? when an Ad Hominem attack is being used. Explain why it is an attack on personhood rather than debating a difference of policy or issue under discussion.

Explanation:

An Ad Hominem attack is a type of logical fallacy in which a person attacks the character or personal traits of their opponent instead of addressing the substance of their argument. In other words, instead of engaging with the topic at hand, the attacker tries to discredit the person making the argument.

For example, if someone presents an argument in favor of a particular policy, and their opponent responds by saying that we shouldn't listen to that person because they have a negative reputation or questionable history, that's an Ad Hominem attack. Instead of discussing the policy itself, the opponent is trying to discredit the person making the argument.

This type of attack is not helpful for resolving a discussion because it does not address the issue at hand. Instead, it focuses on the personality or character of the person making the argument. Therefore, it's important to focus on the argument itself, rather than the person making it, in order to have a productive discussion.

We use the following terms to describe "the government" to distinguish between parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems: (with the other ministries and the president or prime minister as its members).

The degree of separation of authority between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches differs noticeably across diverse systems. The extent of the executive's responsibility to the legislature is another important difference between presidential and parliamentary systems.

The parliamentary system has the benefit of making it easier to implement laws, such as funding for programs or the approval of government budgets, because of the administration's accountability to the legislative body, which lessens deadlock.

Learn more about parliamentary system: https://brainly.com/question/648357

#SPJ1

The import tax was initially the main way the federal government funded itself in the United States. It was also known as the Tariff Act of 1789 and was signed into law by President George Washington. (Option C).

An import tax, also known as a tariff, is a tax imposed by a government on goods and services imported from other countries. The purpose of an import tax is to raise revenue for the government, protect domestic industries from foreign competition, and/or to influence the trade policies of other countries.

Import taxes can be levied on a specific product, a group of products, or on all imports from a particular country. The amount of the tax is usually a percentage of the value of the imported goods or a fixed amount per unit. Import taxes are typically paid by the importer to the customs authorities of the country where the goods are being imported.

Learn more about import tax here: https://brainly.com/question/30103833

#SPJ1

The following was NOT a result of the changes in farming in the United States during the Green Revolution The production of agricultural goods became more efficient.

The effects of the agricultural revolution on people varied. It has been connected to a wide range of issues, including socioeconomic inequality (caused by people's greater reliance on the environment and anxieties of scarcity), a loss in nutrition, and an increase in contagious diseases brought on by domesticated animals.

Through adapted practices like (1) expanding the amount of land used for farming, (2) double-cropping, which involves planting two crops per year instead of one, (3) adopting HYV seeds, (4) significantly increasing the use of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides, and (5) improved, the green revolution increased crop productivity.

To Know more about  Green Revolution

https://brainly.com/question/19335313

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a provision included in the United States Constitution during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning representation and taxation among the states. This compromise was necessary to secure the agreement of southern states to the new Constitution, as they wanted slaves to be counted as full persons for the purpose of representation, but not for the purpose of taxation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise has been widely criticized for perpetuating the institution of slavery and treating enslaved persons as less than fully human. One way to improve the Constitution with regard to this issue would be to remove any provisions that treat individuals differently based on their race, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. This could include amendments that explicitly prohibit the use of race or ethnicity in determining representation or taxation, or that guarantee equal protection under the law for all people regardless of their race or ethnicity.

Another way to address the legacy of the Three-Fifths Compromise and other discriminatory provisions of the Constitution would be to promote greater civic education and engagement around issues of race and equality. This could involve expanding educational resources and opportunities to help people understand the history and ongoing impacts of racism, as well as providing greater support for organizations and initiatives that promote diversity, inclusion, and social justice.

The Nation of Islam (NOI) regards Wallace D. Fard as a divine and mysterious figure who brought a new message of Islam to the African American community in the early 20th century.

The NOI teaches that Fard was not only a religious leader but also a social reformer who sought to uplift the black community from the oppression and discrimination they faced.

According to NOI teachings, Fard founded the organization in Detroit, Michigan, in 1930 and appointed Elijah Muhammad as his successor. Fard disappeared in 1934, and his whereabouts and fate are unknown. However, the NOI believes that he will one day return to complete his mission.

The importance of these beliefs to the NOI is that they provide a unique and empowering identity for African Americans, separate from mainstream Islam and Christianity. The NOI's teachings on Fard also emphasize self-reliance, self-determination, and the need for African Americans to come together and work towards their own liberation and progress.

Learn more about Islam on;

https://brainly.com/question/4466

#SPJ1

Read the Nation of Islam Perspective on its founder, Briefly summarize what you have learned from the assigned reading(s) and discuss why these are important to you.

Answer:

what impression of the americans does japanese image convey

Explanation:

It is difficult to provide a definitive answer without additional context, such as the time period and specific Japanese image in question. However, during World War II, Japanese propaganda often portrayed Americans as cruel, barbaric, and racist. The Japanese government used propaganda to portray the United States as a nation bent on world domination and accused Americans of atrocities such as bombing civilians and committing war crimes. This propaganda was meant to mobilize support for the war effort in Japan and to dehumanize the American enemy. Similarly, American propaganda during the war often portrayed the Japanese as a fanatical and inhumane enemy. It is important to note that propaganda is often designed to manipulate public opinion, and may not reflect the actual attitudes or experiences of the people being depicted.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 was a landmark decision in the fight for civil rights in the United States. The ruling declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. While the ruling was a victory for the civil rights movement, it was met with mixed reactions from different segments of society, as reflected in the excerpted newspaper editorials.

One editorial in The Richmond News Leader from May 18, 1954, argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an overreach of federal power and would lead to chaos and conflict. The editorial claimed that the ruling went against established legal precedent and would disrupt the long-held practice of separate but equal. The editorial stated, "This is not the first time that the Supreme Court has been deluded by the false theory that it has the power to reshape the Constitution."

In contrast, an editorial in The New York Times from the same day praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling as a significant step towards ending segregation and achieving racial equality. The editorial declared, "The Supreme Court has taken a courageous step in affirming the principles of democracy." The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would face resistance and that it would take time for it to be fully implemented, but it was a necessary step in the struggle for civil rights.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had significant effects on the larger civil rights movement. It paved the way for the desegregation of schools and other public spaces and challenged the legal basis of segregation. The ruling also inspired other civil rights activists to fight for their rights and encouraged them to use the legal system to do so.

However, the ruling also faced backlash from those who opposed desegregation and the civil rights movement as a whole. Some states even defied the ruling and refused to integrate their schools, leading to further legal battles and tensions between federal and state governments.

In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a significant moment in the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. While it was met with mixed reactions, it marked a turning point in the fight against segregation and discrimination. The ruling's effects were far-reaching, impacting not only the education system but also other areas of society.

Answer:

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1954 that declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. This ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society as a whole. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical. This essay will examine the events that led to the ruling, as well as the effects of the ruling on the larger civil rights movement.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was the result of a legal challenge brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1951. The NAACP argued that segregation in public schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was consolidated with several other cases from across the country that also challenged segregation in public schools. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in 1952, and the case was re-argued in 1953.

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional because it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court reasoned that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and that segregation had a detrimental effect on the education and development of black children.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound impact on the larger civil rights movement. The ruling was a critical victory for the NAACP and other civil rights organizations that had been fighting segregation for decades. The decision also gave a significant boost to the growing civil rights movement, which was gaining momentum in the 1950s.

One of the newspaper editorials that praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was published in The New York Times. The editorial argued that the decision was a victory for American democracy and that it would help to strengthen the nation's commitment to equal rights. The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would be difficult to implement, but it called on Americans to work together to ensure that the decision was fully enforced.

Another editorial that took a different view was published in The Daily Oklahoman. The editorial argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an example of judicial activism and that it undermined the authority of state and local governments. The editorial also claimed that the decision would lead to chaos and conflict in the South.

Despite these criticisms, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound and lasting impact on American society. The decision paved the way for other civil rights victories, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It also helped to inspire a new generation of civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., who would go on to lead the movement in the 1960s.

In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society. The ruling was the result of years of hard work by civil rights organizations, and it marked a turning point in the struggle for equal rights. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical, but the ruling's impact was undeniable. It helped to pave the way for other civil rights victories and inspired a new generation of leaders to continue the fight for equality.