Answer:
One of the most important effects of the terms of the contract in a contract of employment is the obligation as to payment of wages imputed on the employer, which is usually effected in form of remuneration.
Explanation: as said above
The terms of a contract in an employment contract specify the terms of employment and, because they are legally enforceable, protect both parties.
What is an employment contract?
An agreement between an employer and an employee governing the term of employment is known as an employment contract. It may be assumed, expressed orally, or it may be set forth in a formal written agreement that the employee signs.
The conditions outlined in the contract are determined by what was agreed upon at the time the employee indicated they would accept the position.
The effect of terms in an employment contract is that it enables the employees to understand their duties and responsibilities. It also creates an obligation to the employer for payment of salary.
To learn more about contract of employment
https://brainly.com/question/28274545
#SPJ2
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Find and summarise the case of National Director of Public Prosecutions v Botha (CCT 280/18) [2020] ZACC 06. Your summary must highlight the facts, legal question, the findings and decision of the court
Under the contract dispute act cda, both the contractor and government parties are permitted to submit claims against each other.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
The contract dispute act (CDA) are responsible for performing oversight functions on all contracts in the United States of America.
Under the contract dispute act (CDA), both the contractor and government parties that enter into a contract are permitted to submit claims against each other.
'न्यायपालिकाको महत्व,कानुन सुसासनको निम्ति' यो शिर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख।
Answer:
Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.
Discuss what traits successful law enforcement leaders have. If you had to select one most important characteristic of a law enforcement leader, explain which characteristic you would select. Defend and be specific. Of the common errors made by those who manage, supervise and lead, explain which has the most potential for the most ill effects on a department. Give examples and support your decision.
Answer and Explanation:
A successful leader must be someone who is incorruptible, fair, tolerant and egalitarian, who does his job in a peaceful, correct and progress-promoting way, free from prejudice. The absence of prejudice and the ability to act in a peaceful manner are the main characteristics that a police leader must present. This is because a police leader who has these characteristics serves as an example to other police officers, who can shape their work and behavior to be less violent professionals and who judge people correctly, without considering racism and prejudice.
Within a department, corruption is the most harmful characteristic among legal professionals. This corruption takes away from the sense of fairness that is so essential within a police department. An example of this can be seen in corrupt police officers who facilitate illegal activities of powerful people, but fight and destroy black families and other social minorities based only on prejudice.
will transformation in Corrections ever come to an end?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
In simple words, every law that is made or corrected is based on the current needs and aspirations of the society. And it is also a big fact that the basic societal structure of any community keeps on changing time by time. Hence, the transformations in corrections will keep on happening as the world keeps moving on.
Which of the following theories assumes that crime is committed by free-willed individuals who are
motivated by a hedonistic rationality?
Ba lần phân công lao động nguyên nhân gián tiếp dẫn đến sự hình thành nhà nước
Answer:
Bắt nạt là một thói quen của một người trong đó họ lợi dụng người khác thông qua thể chất, lời nói, tình cảm, xã hội và thậm chí trong thế giới internet hoặc bắt nạt trên mạng. Điều này thường xảy ra với những người có mong muốn khác và muốn đạt được nó một cách nhanh nhất nên hãy dùng vũ lực để đạt được nó.Một số nguyên nhân gây ra hiện tượng xuất tinh ra máu như sau:Họ muốn thống trị, thống trị và được công nhận trong môi trường mà họ thuộc về vì lợi ích cá nhân.Vì khó chịu, bực bội và cực kỳ tức giận trước tình huống hoặc người đó nên nó dồn nén xung lực lên một người khác mà chúng ta biết sẽ không trả đũa.Ngoài ra một trong những nguyên nhân khiến người khác xuất tinh là vì muốn trả thù cho lần xuất tinh đã xảy ra với mình. Bị kiềm chế và không thể trả đũa người đã làm việc đó, nạn nhân cũng tìm đến những người quen trẻ hơn họ, những người mà họ biết là yếu và họ biết họ sẽ không bị trả thù.Tác động của xuất tinh là gì:Nạn nhân bị bắt nạt thường phải trải qua nỗi buồn và trầm cảm rất lớn. Do sự khác biệt lớn trong hành vi và không có khả năng tự vệ trước những kẻ bắt nạt, hầu hết nạn nhân trở nên trầm cảm và trải qua những thay đổi trong cách họ suy nghĩ, giao tiếp xã hội và tương tác với người khác cũng như đối phó với những người khác.Đối với các học sinh, những trải nghiệm sôi sục thông thường là cảm giác sợ hãi và e ngại, điều này lặp lại những điều đã xảy ra với anh ta. Kết quả là đứa trẻ không muốn đến trường. Họ xa cách với những người làm tổn thương và lạm dụng điểm yếu của họ.Khi không được điều trị, một số nạn nhân đã tự tử vì quá áp lực và xấu hổ.Cách đối phó với những kẻ bắt nạt bạn:Nếu bạn sôi nổi, hãy khoan dung những lời đã nói và hãy kiên nhẫn. Như câu nói, "hãy kéo dài sợi dây của bạn ..." Chúng ta hãy học cách tha thứ và quan tâm đầy đủ đến những điều khác có ý nghĩa hơn.Tránh xa hoặc chạy (nếu cần) đến người đang làm bạn sôi sục anh ta không thành công trong việc muốn gây rối.Nhấn mạnh những nhiệm vụ có ý nghĩa hơn trách nhiệm và chống lại những kẻ bắt nạt.Để biết thêm thông tin về hiện tượng sủi bọt, bạn có thể mở các liên kết bên dưới:Ảnh hưởng của bắt nạt đối với học sinh.Nguyên nhân và ảnh hưởng của việc bắt nạt brainly.ph/question/599432#LearnWithBrainlyExplanation:
#Vietnamese#AnswerForTreesDona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
you are researching the effect of air pollution on human health.you find information from the following sources.which of these would likely be the LEAST biased?
Answer:
Any sources related to industries that cause air pollution such as Oil refineries, cigarette companies, thermal electricity generating firms and the like.
Explanation:
A biased source in a subject usually has some sort of interest in it which is usually financial. This is why we'd expect cigarette companies to lie about the effects of smoking on the lungs.
It is the same thing here. You included no options but the biased source should be one that stands to benefit from misleading the public on the effects of air pollution on health so that people are less enraged and they can continue benefitting from their harmful activities.
An Orange distress flag, hand-held orange smoke signal and red flair could all be defined as what ?
Answer:
Destress
Explanation:
Orange indacateing att. Smoke for signalling
hội nghị trao đổi thông tin là gì ?
Answer: Trao đổi thông tin hoặc chia sẻ thông tin có nghĩa là mọi người hoặc các thực thể khác truyền thông tin từ người này sang người khác. Điều này có thể được thực hiện bằng điện tử hoặc thông qua các hệ thống nhất định. Đây là những thuật ngữ có thể đề cập đến việc truyền thông tin hai chiều trong viễn thông và khoa học máy tính hoặc truyền thông được nhìn từ quan điểm lý thuyết hệ thống hoặc lý thuyết thông tin. Như, "thông tin", trong ngữ cảnh này luôn đề cập đến dữ liệu (điện tử) mã hóa và đại diện cho thông tin có sẵn, một phương pháp xử lý rộng hơn có thể được tìm thấy trong quá trình trao đổi dữ liệu.
Explanation:
What are the risks/
dangers does the law
enforcement officers
encounter during operation
6969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969669696969696969696969696969
Answer:
what is the question
please mark me as brainlist
thanks
In a wrongful death action for the death of his wife in an automobile accident, the plaintiff alleged that the accident was caused by a mudflap assembly that fell off the defendant's truck. The plaintiff wishes to introduce the testimony of a witness, another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, who heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose. The witness does not know the identity of the person who gave the warning. Should the court admit the testimony
Answer: Yes. The court should admit the testimony.
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the court should admit the testimony in order to prove that the defendant was aware about the fact that the mudflap assembly was loose.
This can be infered from the information given from the testimony of
the witness, whom was another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, as he heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose.
Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.
Answer:
eh, you face a lot of descrimination and hate especialy from people of the defendent family.
Explanation:
The legal position in real.estate
that the state owns and controls all bodies of water is known as the what?
Answer:
Doctrine of Prior Appropriation
Explanation:
this position requires that property owners obtain permits for use of water.
A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline company that distributed natural gas to providers throughout the country. A local gas company submitted the next highest bid, which included the commitment that it would pass along to local customers any savings if it was awarded the contract. The state awarded the contract to the local company. The interstate company sued to overturn this decision.
Should the interstate company prevail?
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
In our state's prisons testing for prohibited substances doesn't include alcohol. Cite ONLY the correct Code with your T or F.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Since 2018, alcohol has been removed from the list of prohibited substances and is therefore not analyzed in state prisons in most states. However, in cases of driving vehicles in which the driver is under the effect of alcohol, this substance is considered if a prohibited substance test is carried out, as driving under the influence of alcohol is prohibited throughout the country.
el producto final despues de aplicar todo el instructivo. ¿es una manualida? ¿porque?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente, tu pregunta está incompleta. No incluyes ninguna referencia de lo que se trata. No aportas ningún contexto, lectura, ejemplo, texto para poder relacionar tu pregunta.
Sin embargo, tratando de ayudarte hicimos una investigación profunda y encontramos un texto donde se pide algo similar a lo que estás preguntando.
Así que podemos comentarte lo siguiente,
El producto final, después de aplicar todo el instructivo, sí puede ser considerado una manualidad porque ha utilizado los materiales que se sugieren para obtener el resultado final y se ha elaborado de una manera artesanal -es decir.no profesional utilizando los materiales que se pueden conseguir en casa.
Se le considera trabajo manual porque se usaron elementos caseros, sencillos, y se siguieron las instrucciones para que sin ser un experto, consiguieras armar tu creación que fue el teléfono portátil usando vasos desechables, hilo y tijeras.
what is rule of law
Answer:
Restrictions that would enforce pepopel from wrong doings with the consequences listed.
Explanation:
how raid is conducted
Answer: yes
it is for the people who suspected of black money or property.
hope its helps you keep smiling be happy stay safe.
18. Which technique provides a smooth transition from acceleration to braking? A. Skid braking B. Cover braking C. Squeeze braking D. Gentle braking
Answer:
D
Explanation:
when the car weight transfers to the front end, the nose of the car is pointing down. easing off the brake will the nose back up making the braking smooth.
One of the key tactics of the Civil Rights Movement was the widespread use of civil disobedience. This form of peaceful protest is practiced to this day. When can it be effective? When can it backfire?
how can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answer: When a victim complains about an incident, the police officers do the right thing like getting all the information about the incident. But, the principles of Ubuntu is not about what is right, it is about what is ethical to do. The people should treat the victims respectfully and they should be given more empathy.
A theory is an explanation while a model is a representation vividly identify and describe the meeting point of the two concepts. ?
Explanation:
A theory is a conceptualized framework. It is a generalized phenomenon which is accepted by many people in the society. Model, on the other hand, is a physical, symbolical, or verbal representation of a concept which has been found in order to make the understanding of something clearer. The main difference between model and theory is that theories can be considered as answers to various problems identified especially in the scientific world
A community group is upset because drivers speed through their neighborhood. they want the local government to to install a stop sign or a speed bump to make drivers slow down. Which option might be the best way for them to accomplish this?
Answer:
the answer of this question is that A)They should go to the local government board meeting to plead their case. i hope it will help you
Answer:
Organize your campaign and ads
Build a case and communicate with local government, your nearest government building such as the county house.
Determine if speed humps are right for your street, and what it may cause negatively and positively
Then Get your local government to act
Explanation: as such said above
What results from the federal system of government in the United States?
A Only powers specifically given to the government are legal.
B. Citizens vote on some issues directly rather than through
representatives.
C. State governments have some powers that the federal
govemment does not have
D. The powers of the national government are limited by law.
Answer:
Only powers specifically given to the government are legal
Explanation:
What results from the federal system of government in the United States is that only powers specifically given to the government are legal
This is because the government of the United States of America is governed by the Constitution which is considered supreme and any power that is not specifically given by the constitution to the government is considered illegal.
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
Based on the three elements of the contract intended to create a legal relationship, capacity and judgment, advise Sandhu if there is a prospect for him to recover the additional commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.
1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.
3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? Certainly not.