Problem statements frequently contain three components: The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about. It should be exactly like the research question. It should be feasible.
What is problem statement?A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement.
The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.
Learn more about Problem statements
https://brainly.com/question/11657822
#SPJ4
Problem statements frequently contain three components:
The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about. It should be exactly like the research question. It should be feasible.What is problem statement?A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement.
The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.
Learn more about Problem statements
brainly.com/question/11657822
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. in 2011, jared loughner shot congresswoman giffords and multiple other victims. the issue of competency to stand trial was raised in his case. ultimately, the court found that mr. loughner______
In 2011, jared loughner shot congresswoman giffords and multiple other victims. the issue of competency to stand trial was raised in his case. ultimately, the court found that mr. loughner Suffered from schizophrenia and was not competent to stand trial.
Jared Lee Loughner is an American mass murderer who pled guilty to 19 counts of murder and attempted murder in connection with the Tucson shooting on January 8, 2011, in which he shot and seriously injured U.S.
Representative Gabrielle Giffords and killed six people, including Chief U.S. District Court Judge John Roll, Gabe Zimmerman, a member of Giffords' staff, and Christina-Taylor Green, a 9-year-old girl. Loughner shot and injured 13 people, one of whom was injured while being subdued.
Learn more about Jared Lee Loughner
https://brainly.com/question/7345988
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an outcome typically associated with authoritarian leadership? a. two-way of communicationb. abusive supervisionc.loose hierarchyd. a culture of independent thinkers
The correct answer is b. Abusive supervision is typically associated with authoritarian leadership.
Authoritarian leadership is characterized by a strict, centralized control and decision-making structure, with the leader having complete authority and control over the subordinates. In this type of leadership, communication is usually one-way, from the leader to the subordinates, with little opportunity for feedback or input from the subordinates.
There is a rigid hierarchy in place, with clear lines of authority, and subordinates are expected to obey orders without question. The culture within an authoritarian leadership system is not conducive to independent thinking or creativity, as there is a strong emphasis on obedience and following rules and procedures.
Learn more about Authoritarian Leadership here: https://brainly.com/question/10182978
#SPJ4
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
why did women’s rights leaders oppose the fourteenth amendment?
The women's rights leaders had shown a strong sense of opposition to the fourteenth amendment, as this amendment contained the protection only for the ''male'' section of the society, and females were out of its scope.
The fourteenth amendment of the National Constitution of the United States of America holds a great amount of significance in the American society. However, it has also been popularized as the amendment that received initial opposition from the women's rights leaders due to the inclusion of the word ''male'' while pointing out the granted protections thereunder.
Learn more about fourteenth amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ4
1. For whom moral is applied? Why?
Answer:
Morality usually pertains to people and their choices and behaviours. It deals with issues of fairness, justice, and right and wrong. It is a set of guidelines for how people should act and is frequently related to ideas like ethics, integrity, and accountability. But morality can also be used to describe social structures like organisations, societies, or countries. In these situations, the issue is how the group ought to act and what principles it ought to uphold.
Hope it helps!
Explanation:
Given how police are currently viewed in some minority communities , would this deter you from becoming a Law Enforcement Officer ? Why or why not
Answer:
No, because it would make me want to become an officer more so that i could y to make a change in the way people view officers.
Explanation:
Does underrepresentation of women on the bench hurt justice? Would citizens' view of the fairness of courts improve if more nontraditional persons became judges?
Yes, underrepresentation of women on the bench can hurt justice as it can lead to a lack of diversity in perspectives, experiences, and life experiences, which are essential in the administration of justice.
What is the underrepresentation of women?Generally, A diverse bench provides a more comprehensive understanding of the issues that come before the court and can lead to better decision making.
Additionally, having more nontraditional persons, including women, as judges can improve citizens' view of the fairness of courts.
A judiciary that reflects the diversity of the population it serves can increase public trust and confidence in the judicial system. This can lead to increased credibility and legitimacy of the courts, as well as better representation of the interests and needs of all citizens.
Read more about the underrepresentation of women
https://brainly.com/question/7336834
#SPJ1
which example of research with prisoners would be allowable
Examining age at first arrest as a predictor of adult felonious history example of research with prisoners would be allowable.
Exploration is a methodical inquiry process that includes data gathering, attestation of important information, and analysis, including interpretation of that data and information in agreement with applicable procedures established by particular academic and professional disciplines. The term itself was taken from the Old French term" experimenter," a emulsion word from" re-"" catchier," or" hunt," meaning" hunt."
The word exploration is deduced first from Middle French" recherche," which means" to go about searching." The word was first used in writing in 1577. exploration is the process of looking for results to a certain issue. It can be carried out to comprehend a miracle, observe geste or
test a proposition, among other effects. totally carried out exploration adds to the body of knowledge.
Learn more about prisoners at
https://brainly.com/question/5724231
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which example of research with prisoners would be allowable under the regulations?
An average freight train traveling off ? Mph needs a stopping distance of 1/2 miles
A conventional train travels at an even slower average speed than an intermodal train, which averages 31.7 km/h.
How fast does a freight train travel?A 55 MPH freight train will typically stop after 1 to 112 miles of travel. The typical car can stop at 200 feet when moving at the same speed. The stopping distance grows longer as an object's weight increases.
Trains are 3–4 times more fuel-efficient than trucks in terms of hauling a tonne of cargo over 480 miles on average on just one gallon of fuel. The most fuel-efficient method of moving goods over land is by rail, and railroads are constantly investing in new technology to use less fuel.
Learn more about freight trains here:
https://brainly.com/question/198718
#SPJ1
why is ohio holding a state wide vote on the issue of legalization of marijuana?
Answer:
Medicine
Explanation:
They are saying that it can be used as medicine, but to be able to use it as medicine, they have to make it legal.
acclrding to a rational matrial explanation 2013 government shutdown was mainly a conflict between
The federal government had to shut down due to a lack of funds appropriated at the beginning of the new 2014 rational matrial.
federal fiscal year because the Senate refused to pass the bill with provisions to delay the Affordable Care Act, and the two legislative houses had not developed a compromise bill by the end of September 2013 either. Due to furloughs of federal workers, reduced public services, and delays in payments to Federal grantees, States, localities, contractors, and people, the closure had an impact on millions of Americans. Government shutdowns take place in the United States when financing bills for the government's upcoming fiscal year or a temporary funding measure are not passed. the federal government shuts down when there is Organizations must categorize their staff as "essential" or "non-essential." The "essential" personnel carry on with their jobs throughout the shutdown. The "non-essential" staff, meanwhile, are placed on unpaid furlough rational matrial.
Learn more about rational here :
https://brainly.com/question/30359155
#SPJ4
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
It is completely inappropriate to mention that the statement given above regarding the significance of state trial court. Thus, the statement is false.
The decision that is given by a state's trial court is never taken in the primary influence of the decision given by an earlier court. However, they can definitely consider the decision of the prior court to decide on what basis and grounds such decision was taken, and the verdict was made. A state's trial court can never be under any sort of obligation to follow the decisions that were made by the prior courts.
Learn more about trial courts, here:
brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
Complete question
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
TRUE OR FALSE
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
It is completely inappropriate to mention that the statement given above regarding the significance of a Florida state trial court. Thus, the statement is false.
The decision made by a trial court is never taken in influence of the decision given by a prior court. However, they can definitely consider the decision of the prior court to decide on what grounds such decision was made. A state's trial court can never be under any sort of obligation to follow the decisions that were made by the earlier courts.
Learn more about trial courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
Complete question
a florida state trial court found a party guilty of fraud. should a future case arise with the same basic fact pattern, other florida state courts will be bound by that precedent and are obligated follow the reasoning and decision of the prior court’s decision.
TRUE OR FALSE
company that is in the market with a few buying options for the consumer is enjoying a high amount of which of porter's five competitive forces
Porter's Five Competitive Forces is a framework introduced by Michael Porter to analyze the competitiveness of an industry. It consists of five competitive forces, including the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute products or services, and the intensity of competitive rivalry. The strength of each of these competitive forces determines the overall competitiveness of the industry.
If a student company is enjoying a high amount of success in the market, it is likely that one or more of these competitive forces are working in its favor. Let's examine each of these competitive forces in detail:
Threat of new entrants: This refers to the ease with which new companies can enter the market and compete with existing companies. If there are high barriers to entry, such as patents, economies of scale, or brand recognition, it becomes more difficult for new entrants to compete, which strengthens the position of existing companies.
Bargaining power of buyers: This refers to the ability of buyers to negotiate lower prices or better terms from suppliers. If buyers have a lot of bargaining power, it can put pressure on the student company to lower its prices or improve its offerings.
Bargaining power of suppliers: This refers to the ability of suppliers to negotiate higher prices or better terms from buyers. If suppliers have a lot of bargaining power, it can put pressure on the student company to pay more for inputs, which can affect its profitability.
Threat of substitute products or services: This refers to the existence of alternative products or services that can be used to satisfy the same need. If there are many substitutes available, it becomes more difficult for the student company to maintain its market position.
Intensity of competitive rivalry: This refers to the level of competition between existing companies in the market. If there is intense competition, it becomes more difficult for the student company to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage.
It's important to note that the strength of these competitive forces can change over time, so it's important for the student company to continually monitor and analyze its market and competition. By understanding the competitive forces at play in its market, the student company can make informed decisions to improve its competitiveness and achieve long-term success.
For more about competitive forces:
https://brainly.com/question/14765938
#SPJ11
What authority does the federal government have under the Commerce Clause? Choose 2 answer choices.
To regulate international commerce and To regulate commerce on the national and local levels the federal government have under the Commerce Clause.
The U.S. Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 is referred to as the "Commerce Clause" and grants Congress the authority "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several states, and with the Indian tribes."
Congress has frequently cited the Commerce Clause as justification for exercising legislative authority over the decisions made by states and their citizens, igniting a heated and ongoing controversy regarding the division of power between the federal government and the states. The Commerce Clause has long been viewed as a restriction on the ability of the States to self-regulate as well as a grant of power to Congress.
To know more about Commerce Clause:
https://brainly.com/question/15224763
#SPJ4
what are some reasons a factory would employ children instead of adults?
As children may be hired for less money and have more stamina to use in production environments, many international corporations frequently employed children.
Children were easier to manage and control than adults, and perhaps most importantly, they could be paid less than adults. Their size allowed them to move in cramped areas of factories or mines where adults couldn't fit. Child labour and exploitation are the results of a variety of reasons, including poverty, social norms that support them, a lack of opportunity for adults and teenagers to find respectable work, migration, and emergencies. These elements not only contribute to social injustices that are exacerbated by discrimination, but they are also a result of those injustices.
For more questions on child labor, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28912800
#SPJ4
Cabinet secretaries tend to be more prominent in the media during
The cabinet secretaries generally tend to become more and more prominent in the media houses during the times of national crises.
The cabinet secretaries can be regarded as the official set of personnel who tend to take up the roles as the deputy to the ministers that hold a power over their respective cabinets. Moreover, these secretaries represent their respective ministry to address the nation at times when there is a situation of national crisis in the countries and the governments related thereto.
Learn more about cabinet secretary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545701
#SPJ4
while the british retreated to boston, what did the american troops do?
As the British retreated from Boston, the American troops attacked them and inflicted casualties.
How did the American troops react to British retreat from Boston ?Colonial troops met fresh waves of British retreating from Boston. The militias shot from behind trees and fences, killing approximately 125 people, including numerous officers. Both parties were taken aback by how intense the fight was.
The eight-year British occupation of Boston, dreaded for such tragic incidents as the "Boston Massacre," in which five colonists were shot and executed by British soldiers, came to an end with the Patriots' bloodless liberation of the city.
Find out more on the British retreat from Boston at https://brainly.com/question/11291592
#SPJ1
challenge to the constitutionality of an executive order that limits certain state actions is
A. subject to the exclusive authority of Congress.
B. within the power of judicial review.
C. solely for the executive to decide.
D. beyond the jurisdiction of the courts.
(B) Challenge to the constitutionality of an executive order that limits certain state actions is within the power of judicial review.
The ability of the courts to decide that actions taken by the other branches of the government are unconstitutional and, as a result, unenforceable is known as judicial review. For instance, judges would have the ability to declare that a statute passed by Congress prohibiting media from publishing information about specific political issues is illegal because it violates the First Amendment. On the basis of state or federal constitutions, state courts may even overturn their own state's legislation.
Legal review is now something we take for granted. In actuality, it is one of the fundamental features of American government. Nearly every day, rulings from courts around the nation declare state and federal regulations to be unlawful. These laws have recently dealt with issues like abortion restrictions, voter identification laws, gun control, same-sex marriage bans, and gun restrictions.
To know more about judicial review:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
what did the articles of confederation not allow congress to do
the indigenous law of the sub-saharan african jurisdictions quarmyne discusses included what kind of protections for people accused of witchcraft?
The indigenous law of the Quarmyne in sub-Saharan African jurisdictions includes protections for people accused of witchcraft.
The Quarmyne indigenous law recognizes the belief in witchcraft and seeks to protect those who are falsely accused of practicing it. This law views witchcraft as a religious or spiritual belief and acknowledges that accusations of witchcraft are often used to settle disputes or resolve conflicts.
The protections provided by the Quarmyne law include a requirement for strong evidence before someone can be convicted of witchcraft and restrictions on the use of physical force or violence against those accused of practicing it.
Additionally, the law seeks to provide a fair and impartial trial process to ensure that individuals are not unfairly persecuted or punished for their beliefs.
To know more about indigenous law click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28525120#
#SPJ11
today, an estimated __________ of local police departments require a degree from a two-year college.
A bachelor's degree increases a police officer's pay by 1–7.49% in roughly 75% of law enforcement departments, according to the Police Foundation.
For the majority of employment, federal agencies like the FBI and CIA require a bachelor's degree in addition to further training. A college degree is required in 32% of the departments. 23% of jobs call for a two-year degree. Only 2% of neighborhood police agencies need a four-year degree. A more educated officer is less likely to have disciplinary issues, and more education can also result in improved communication. remedy for discrimination. justice for employees' rights. What proportion of police agencies only hire candidates who have completed four years of college one percent The level of education needed to become a law enforcement officer is considerable in various regions around the U.S. equivalent to a diploma from school. The median pay for all law enforcement personnel in May 2021 was $61,190, although advanced education is essential to moving in the ranks.
Learn more about police here :
https://brainly.com/question/14954845
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. the common characteristic of american law is that it creates: _____, _______, and ________ that reflect accepted views of the society. (choose all correct answers).
The common characteristic of American law is that it creates: duties, obligation, or rights that reflect accepted views of the society.
A party has an obligation when they are accountable for upholding the conditions of a deal or contract. The legal system frequently gives the harmed party redress when a duty is not upheld. Our economy is based on promises. A stable, good society is aided by trust that agreements will be upheld. Any entity that functions within a society, including people, businesses, governments, banks, and organizations, is required to routinely uphold its duties or risk penalty. Punishments, such as jail or fines, are frequently meted out for failure to comply with requirements.
Learn more about Obligation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29560348
#SPJ4
any considerable offense offered might seriously endanger the fidelity of the native troops, but how?
Native troops are usually loyal to their superiors, however, any considerable offense offered might seriously endanger their fidelity. Native troops, in many cases, have loyalty to their own leaders and their own culture.
If their leaders or culture is insulted or wronged in any way, the native troops may become disillusioned with their superiors. This can lead to decreased morale, a lack of motivation and loyalty, and, in extreme cases, a mutiny or a rebellion.
Therefore, it is important for superiors to be aware of the potential consequences of any offense they may give to their native troops and to take measures to ensure that they maintain their loyalty.
know more about Native troops here
https://brainly.com/question/2978218#
#SPJ11
The provision above overturned the. answer choices. Alien and Sedition Acts. Chinese Exclusion Act. Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
The provision above overturned the Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Dred Scott v. Sandford was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1857 that ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be considered citizens and therefore had no right to sue in federal court. The provision referred to in the question overturned this decision, granting citizenship and constitutional protections to African Americans. The provision above overturned the Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford. This was a significant step towards ending the institutionalized oppression and discrimination faced by Black people in the United States and laid the groundwork for further civil rights advancements in the years to come.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Is Newton's law a scientific law?
Among the many scientific rules, Newton's third law of motion is simply one.
A scientific law is a proposition that states what consistently takes place under specific circumstances.
The first law of motion established by Newton is another illustration of a law in physical science.
Because they represent the cornerstone of classical mechanics, one of the primary areas of physics,
Newton's laws of motion are significant. The study of mechanics focuses on how objects move or remain immobile in the presence of forces.
The motion of an item is related to the forces operating on it by Newton's equations of motion.
According to the first law, until a force acts on an item, it will not alter its motion. According to the second law, an object's force is determined by multiplying its mass by its acceleration.
According to the third law, when two objects interact, they exert equal-sized and opposite-direction pressures upon one another.
To learn more about Newton's laws of motion from given link
https://brainly.com/question/28171613
#SPJ4
false imprisonment by menace, violence, fraud and/or deceit
False Imprisonment can be fulfilled by violenceor imminence. It can also be fulfilled by fraud and dishonesty.
False imprisonment occurs when a person is designedly confined by another person in a bounded area without legal defense or concurrence. This applies to both private as well as government detention. When the restraint is total and the person is averted from going out of certain limits, the offence is that of unlawful confinement as defined in Section 340 of IPC.( 2) The Indian Penal Code punishes unlawful imprisonment under sections 339- 348.( 3) In case of unlawful arrest by police authorities, proving false imprisonment is enough to gain the writ of Habeas Corpus.
The person does n’t need to be put behind bars, but he must be confined in an area from which there are no possible ways of escape except the person’s will that has confined him. Depending on the laws of a governance, unlawful imprisonment can also be a crime and purposeful tort. False imprisonment can come in numerous forms; physical force is frequently used, but it isn’t a necessary condition.
Learn more about false imprisonment at
https://brainly.com/question/30327971
#SPJ4
how does the constitution provide for the powers of the states in the federal system
As long as those powers are not granted to the federal government, the tenth amendment reserves them to the states.
The Constitution grants the national government three different sorts of authority:
1. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution expressly grants the federal government DELEGATED (also known as enumerated or stated) powers. This includes the authority to enact laws governing commerce, coin money, declare war, build and maintain an army, and establish a post office. The Constitution grants the federal government 27 specified authorities in total.
2. IMPLIED POWERS may be inferred from the elastic (or "necessary and proper") clause even though they are not expressly defined in the Constitution (Article I, Section 8). The phrase "to make all laws" means that Congress has the authority to "make all laws necessary and suitable for carrying into action the foregoing powers, and other authorities inherent in the government of the United States."
3. Despite not being officially mentioned in the Constitution, inherent powers result from the national government's sheer existence.
To know more about federal government:
https://brainly.com/question/15824880
#SPJ4
how long does it take for state return to be accepted
Describe the powers of Supreme Court
The Constitution's language does not mention the most well-known Supreme Court power, judicial review, or the ability to declare a legislative or executive action to be in violation of the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, the court articulated this theory (1803).
In this case, the Court had to decide whether a Congress Act or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Supreme Court was granted original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus by the Judiciary Act of 1789. (Judicial orders requiring government representatives to follow the law).The Supreme Court recognized that the Constitution did not empower the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter despite a lawsuit being filed under this Act. The Supreme Law of the Land is established by Article VI of the Constitution, hence the Court ruled that a congressional act that is in violation of the Constitution cannot be upheld.
To know more about Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4