Use the theoretical method to determine the probability of the outcome or event given below.

The next president of the United States was born on Monday

Answer:

3/4-1/2=1/4 4/5-3/15

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4-1/2

=3/4-2/4

=1/4

4/5-3/15

=4/5-1/5

=3/5

Answer:

4 + 5i

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate this you have to combine the like terms until they cannot be combined any further:

7 + 10i + 4 - 10i - (7 - 5i)

11 + 0i - 7 - 5i

7 & 4 are liked terms so add them together + subtract 10i and 10i

4 + 5i  <--- Final answer

Hope this helps!

Answer:

4 + 5i

Step-by-step explanation:

(7 + 10i) + (4 - 10i) - (7 - 5i)

7 + 10i + 4 - 10i - (7 - 5i)

11 - 7 + 5i

4 + 51

Answer:

a = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

(a, -1) is (x, y)

Plug in the value of y into the given equation to solve for a (x):

4x - 3(-1) = 15

4x + 3 = 15

4x = 12

x = 3

(x, y) is (a, -1) so (a, -1) = (3, -1)

Answer: a=3

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given a point and an equation. To see what "a" is, we can plug in the coordinate into the equation and solve for x.

4a-3(-1)=15       [multiply]

4a+3=15           [subtract both sides by 3]

4a=12               [divide both sides by 4]

a=3

Now, we know that a=3.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Since x=0, and it's not <0, the "else statement" is executed making y=0+2

There is a category called "computer and technology", maybe you can get better answers if you select that instead of "mathematics"

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Total no. of goods, n = 200

no. of defective units in the goods, d = 20

hence the no. of proper units,

g = n-d

g = = 200-20

g = 180

a)

ways in which a vending company buys fifteen of these microwaves and receive no defective units be:

[tex]^{180}C_{15}=\frac{180!}{15!\times (180-15)!}[/tex]

[tex]\approx 2.83\times 10^{21}[/tex]

b)

ways in which a vending company buys fifteen of these microwaves and receive exactly two defective units be:

[tex]^{20}C_2\times ^{180}C_{13}=\frac{20!}{2!\times (20-2)!} \times \frac{180!}{13!\times (180-13)!}[/tex]

[tex]\approx 190\times (2.146\times 10^{19})[/tex]

[tex]\approx 4.076\times 10^{21}[/tex]

c)

ways in which a vending company buys fifteen of these microwaves and receive at least one defective units be:

[tex]^{20}C_{1}\times ^{199}C_{14}=\frac{20!}{1!\times (20-1)!} \times \frac{199!}{13!\times (199-13)!}[/tex]

[tex]\approx 20\times (8.258\times 10^{19})[/tex]

[tex]\approx 1.652\times 10^{21}[/tex]

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm going to call x, x1 because I want to use x as a variable.

So we have a ray with points (0,0) and (3x1,5) on it. This equation for this ray would be y=5/(3x1)×x.

We have another ray with points (0,0) and (2,-6). This equation for this ray would be y=-6/2×x or y=-3x.

We want these two lines' slopes to be opposite reciprocals. The opposite reciprocal of -3 is 1/3.

So we want to find x1 such that 5/(3x1)=1/3.

Cross multiply: 15=3x1

Divide both sides by 3: 5=x1

We want x1 to be 5 so that 5/(3×5) and -3 are opposite reciprocals which they are.

Another way:

If two vectors are perpendicular, then their dot product is 0.

The dot product of <3x,5> and <2,-6> is 3x(2)+5(-6).

Let's simplify:

6x-30.

We want this to be 0.

6x-30=0

Add 30 on both sides:

6x=30

Divide both sides by 6:

x=5

Answer:

option d is correct one in which value of T lies

Answer:

Evaluación de expresiones y polinomios

Purplemath

"Evaluación" significa principalmente "simplificar una expresión a un solo valor numérico". A veces se le dará una expresión numérica, donde todo lo que tiene que hacer es simplificar; esa es más una cuestión de orden de operaciones. En esta lección, me concentraré en el aspecto de la evaluación de "conectar y tragar": introducir valores para las variables y "avanzar" hasta llegar a la respuesta simplificada.

(Por cierto, sí, "plug-n-chug" es una terminología bastante estándar. No es un término "técnico", por lo que probablemente no lo verá en su libro de texto, pero seguramente lo escuchará de otros estudiantes. , y quizás también su instructor.)

MathHelp.com

Evaluar expresiones en MathHelp.com

Evaluar expresiones

Por lo general, la única parte difícil de la evaluación es hacer un seguimiento de los signos "menos". Le recomiendo encarecidamente que utilice los paréntesis libremente, especialmente cuando recién está comenzando.

Evalúe a2b para a = –2, b = 3, c = –4 y d = 4.

Anuncio publicitario

Para encontrar mi respuesta, simplemente conecto los valores dados, teniendo cuidado de usar paréntesis, particularmente alrededor de los signos "menos". Especialmente cuando recién estoy comenzando, dibujar los paréntesis primero puede ser útil:

a2 b

() 2 ()

(–2) 2 (3)

(4) (3)

12

Observe cómo el uso de paréntesis me ayudó a realizar un seguimiento del signo "menos" en el valor de a. Esto era importante, porque de otro modo podría haber elevado al cuadrado solo el 2, terminando con –4, lo que habría estado mal.

Por cierto, resultó que no necesitábamos los valores de las variables c y d. Cuando se le da un gran conjunto de expresiones para evaluar, debe esperar que a menudo haya una u otra de las variables que no se incluirán en ningún ejercicio en particular del conjunto.

Evalúe a - cd para a = –2, b = 3, c = –4 y d = 4.

En este ejercicio, me dieron información adicional. No hay una b en la expresión que quieren que evalúe, por lo que puedo ignorar este valor en mi trabajo:

(–2) - (–4) (4)

–2 - (–16)

–2 + 16

16 - 2

14

Step-by-step explanation:

hola

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

First lets list all the factors of these numbers

72: 1,2 3,4,6,8,9,12,18,24,36,72

84: 1 , 2 , 3 ,4 , 6 , 7 , 12 , 14 ,  21 , 28 , 42 , 84

Now lets find the biggest number that is a factor of both 84 and 72  

as we can see the highest number that is the factor of both 84 and 72 is 12

12 is the hcf

Answer:

B. -infinity < x < infinity

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it's linear and kind of horizontal, it stretches to infinity on both sides (indicated by arrows on both sides of the line.

Answer:

3 units

Step-by-step explanation:

(4,2) (7,2)

Subtract 4 from 7 = 3

Subtract 2 from 2 = 0

This means that (7,2) is 3 units up from (4,2).

:) ur welcome

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

D=√(x2-x1)²+(y2-y1)²

D=√(7-4)²+(2-2)²

D=√(3)²+0

D=3²*½

D=3

Answer:

Part A 12 ≤ 6x ≤ 36

Part B 2 ≤ x ≤ 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: About 6.71 units

Step-by-step explanation:

You use the distance formula: [tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^{2}+(y_{2}-y_{1})^{2} }[/tex].

Assign the the two points to the variables:

[tex](x_{1}, y_{1}) = (1, 3)\\(x_{2}, y_{2}) = (4, -3)[/tex]

Substitute them in the formula:

[tex]\sqrt{(4-1)^{2}+(-3-3)^{2}}[/tex]

And solve it:

[tex]\sqrt{(4-1)^{2}+(-3-3)^{2}}\\=\sqrt{(3)^{2}+(-6)^{2}}\\=\sqrt{9+36}\\=\sqrt{45}\\=6.71[/tex]

Answer:

I got the answer as 6.70 .here's how

Step-by-step explanation:

c= ( 1,3)

d=(4,-3)

Now , formula of distance

√(x2 - x1)^2 +(y2 - y1)^2

or, √(4-1)^2+(-3-3)^2

or, √(3)^2+(-6)^2

or,√9+36

or√45

√45 = 6.70 units approx

Answer - It’s 31.56

Step-by-step explanation: You just do regular multiplication and then add  the decimal point

Answer:

x = 4

y = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equations :-

Second equation can be written as ,

Adding them :-

Put this in (ii) :-

Answer:I’m pretty sure ( not 100% thou ) the awnser would be A) 4

Answer:

(-8,0), (0,-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

180 - 75 = 105

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

tracing paper is your friend

Answer:

Joel wants to find the quotient of a number and 4, minus thirteen

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression :

n/4 - 13

The options B and D cannot be possible answers as they are referring to products and sums which is not a part of the operation used in the expression.

However, the most appropriate option would be A because,

13 is subtracted from the quotient of n/4 which is what the first option expresses.

What is meant by option C however is :

13 - n/4

Hence. Option A is the correct choice.

Answer:

Joel wants to find the quotient of a number and 4, minus thirteen

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] \frac{7 + 7 \sqrt{5} }{ - 4} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We would multiply the fraction by its conjugate

( A conjugate is a expression that has the same integer or number values but have different signs) for example

[tex]5x + 2[/tex]

and

[tex]5x - 2[/tex]

ARE Conjugates.

The conjugate of

[tex]1 - \sqrt{5} [/tex]

is

[tex]1 + \sqrt{5} [/tex]

So this means we will multiply the expression by 1 plus sqr root of 5 on the numerator and denominator.

Our new numerator will be

[tex]7 \times (1 + \sqrt{5} ) = 7 + 7 \sqrt{5} [/tex]

We can apply the difference of squares for the denominator.

[tex](x + y)(x - y) = x {}^{2} - {y}^{2} [/tex]

So our denominator will be

[tex]1 - 5 = - 4[/tex]

So our rationalized fraction will be

[tex] \frac{7 + 7 \sqrt{5} }{ - 4} [/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

95°=6r°+47(being vertically opposite angle)

or,48°=6r

or,48=/6=r°

or,r=8°

The tangent to the curve at a point P (x, y) has slope dy/dx at that point. By the chain rule,

dy/dx = (dy/dθ) / (dx/dθ)

We're in polar coordinates, so

y (θ) = r (θ) sin(θ)   ==>   dy/dθ = dr/dθ sin(θ) + r (θ) cos(θ)

x (θ) = r (θ) cos(θ)   ==>   dx/dθ = dr/dθ cos(θ) - r (θ) sin(θ)

We're given r (θ) = 1 - sin(θ), so that

dr/dθ = -cos(θ)

Then the slope of the tangent to the curve at P is

dy/dx = (dr/dθ sin(θ) + r (θ) cos(θ)) / (dr/dθ cos(θ) - r (θ) sin(θ))

dy/dx = (-cos(θ) sin(θ) + (1 - sin(θ)) cos(θ)) / (-cos²(θ) - (1 - sin(θ)) sin(θ))

dy/dx = - (cos(θ) - sin(2θ)) / (sin(θ) + cos(2θ))

The tangent is horizontal if dy/dx = 0 (or when the numerator vanishes):

cos(θ) - sin(2θ) = 0

cos(θ) - 2 sin(θ) cos(θ) = 0

cos(θ) (1 - 2 sin(θ)) = 0

cos(θ) = 0   or   1 - 2 sin(θ) = 0

cos(θ) = 0   or   sin(θ) = 1/2

[θ = π/2 + 2nπ   or   θ = 3π/2 + 2nπ]   or   [θ = π/6 + 2nπ   or   θ = 5π/6 + 2nπ]

where n is any integer.

In the interval 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, we get solutions of θ = π/6, θ = 5π/6, and θ = 3π/2. (We omit π/2 because the denominator is zero at that point and makes dy/dx undefined.) So the points where the tangent is horizontal are themselves (√3/4, 1/4), (-√3/4, 1/4), and (0, -2), respectively.

The tangent is vertical if 1/(dy/dx) = 0 (or when the denominator vanishes):

sin(θ) + cos(2θ) = 0

sin(θ) + (1 - 2 sin²(θ)) = 0

2 sin²(θ) - sin(θ) - 1 = 0

(2 sin(θ) + 1) (sin(θ) - 1) = 0

2 sin(θ) + 1 = 0   or   sin(θ) - 1 = 0

sin(θ) = -1/2   or   sin(θ) = 1

[θ = 7π/6 + 2nπ   or   θ = 11π/6 + 2nπ]   or   [θ = π/2 + 2nπ]

Then for 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, the tangent will be vertical for θ = 7π/6 and θ = 11π/6, which correspond respectively to the points (-3√3/4, -3/4) and (3√3/4, -3/4). (Again, we omit π/2 because this makes dy/dx non-existent.)

Answer:2x + 50 > 68

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

because is you skip count on two you will count on to 68 so that is why the answer is 7.

Answer:

A. A prediction based on Model 1 is better than a prediction based on Model 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Model 1 :

R² = 0.92

s = 1.65

Model 2 :

R² = 0.85

s = 1.91

The Coefficient of determination of the first model is 0.92 which is greater than the coefficient of determination of the Second model, the coefficient of determination gives the proportion of variation in the dependent variable which is caused by the regression line. Hence, we can say a prediction based on Model 1 is better than a prediction based on Model 2 because a larger proportion of the variation in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.