Answer:
the company should choose method 1
Explanation:
Method 1 Method 2
Initial outlay $550,000 $830,000
operating costs (years 1,2,3) $160,000 $120,000
salvage value $125,000 $324,000
we must determine which alternative has the lowest present value:
method 1 = $550,000 + $160,000/1.1 + $160,000/1.1² + $160,000/1.1³ - $125,000/1.1³ = $550,000 + $145,455 + $132,231 + $120,210 - $93,914 = $853,982
method 2 = $830,000 + $120,000/1.1 + $120,000/1.1² + $120,000/1.1³ - $324,000/1.1³ = $830,000 + $109,091 + $99,174 + $90,158 - $243,426 = $884,996
The following selected transactions were completed by Capers Company during October of the current year:
Oct. 1 Purchased merchandise from Sabol Imports Co., $15,458, terms FOB destination, n/30.
3 Purchased merchandise from Saxon Co., $9,650, terms FOB shipping point, 2/10, n/eom. Prepaid freight of $200 was added to the invoice.
5 Purchased merchandise from Schnee Co., $13,550, terms FOB destination, 2/10, n/30.
6 Issued debit memo to Schnee Co. for merchandise with an invoice amount of $4,350 returned from purchase on July 5.
13 Paid Saxon Co. for invoice of July 3.
14 Paid Schnee Co. for invoice of July 5, less debit memo of July 6.
19 Purchased merchandise from Southmont Co., $27,270, terms FOB shipping point, n/eom.
19 Paid freight of $375 on July 19 purchase from Southmont Co.
20 Purchased merchandise from Stevens Co., $21,400, terms FOB destination, 1/10, n/30.
30 Paid Stevens Co. for invoice of July 20. 31 Paid Sabol Imports Co. for invoice of July 1.
31 Paid Southmont Co. for invoice of July 19.
Required:
Journalize the entries to record the transactions of Capers Company for October.
Answer:
Date Accounts title and explanations Debit$ Credit$
1-Oct Merchandise inventory 15458
Accounts payable - Sabol imports 15458
3-Oct Merchandise Inventory 9850
Accounts payable- Saxon Co. 9650
Cash account 200
4-Oct Merchandise Inventory 13550
Accounts payable- Schnee Co. 13550
6-Oct Accounts payable -Schnee Co 4350
Merchandise inventory 4350
13-Oct Accounts payable-Saxon Co 9650
Cash account 9457
Merchandise inventory 193
(9650*2%)
14-Oct Accounts payable-Schnee Co 9200
Cash account 9016
Merchandise inventory 184
(9200*2%)
19-Oct Merchandise inventory 27270
Accounts payable - Southmont Co 27270
19-Oct Merchandise inventory 375
Cash account 375
20-Oct Merchandise inventory 21400
Accounts payable -Stevens 21400
30-Oct Accounts payable-Stevens 21400
Cash account 21186
Merchandise inventory 214
(21400*1%)
31-Oct Accounts payable-Sabol imports 15458
Cash account 15458
31-Oct Accounts payable -Southmont Co 27270
Cash account 27270
What are two cons of using a credit card?
The following table reports real income per person for several different economies in the years 1960 and 2010. It also gives each economy's average annual growth rate during this period. For example, real income per person in Niger was $945 in 1960, and it actually declined to $570 by 2010. Niger's average annual growth rate during this period was -1.01%, and it was the poorest economy in the table in the year 2010. The real income-per-person figures are denominated in U.S. dollars with a base year of 2005. The following exercises will help you to understand the different growth experiences of these economies.
Economy Real Income per Person in 1960 Real Income per Person in 2010 Annual Growth Rate
(Dollars) (Dollars) (Percent)
Canada 12,946 35,810 2.06
United Kingdom 11,884 32,034 2.00
Korea 1,610 28,702 5.93
Hong Kong 4,518 44,070 4.66
Guatemala 1,985 3,859 1.34
Indicate which economy satisfies each of the following statements.
Statement Canada Guatemala Hong Kong Korea Niger United Kingdom
This economy had the highest level of real income per person in the year 2010.
This economy experienced the fastest rate of growth in real income per person from 1960 to 2010.
Consider the following list of four economies. Which economy began with a level of real income per person in 1960 that was well below that of the United Kingdom and grew fast enough to catch up with and surpass the United Kingdom's real income per person by 2010?
a. Canada
b. Guatemala
c. Hong Kong
d. Korea
The economy began with a level of real income per person in 1960 that was well below that of the United Kingdom and grew fast enough to catch up with and surpass the United Kingdom's real income per person by 2010 is Korea. Thus the correct option is D.
What is the Economy?The economy of any country is determined by the ratio of production and consumption that takes place within a year and evaluates the flow of funds in the market by analyzing the purchasing parity of an individual.
In the given report one can observe that the real income per person in the year 1960 in the United Kingdom was 11,884 with the Real Income per Person in 2010 being 32,034.
Based on the information from the table, it is concluded that Korea is the economy that grew fast enough to catch up with and surpass the United Kingdom's real income per person by 2010.
As of 1960, Korea has Real Income per Person was 1,610 which grew to 28,702 in 2010 showing quick development.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about the Economy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/951950
#SPJ2
Presented below are certain account balances of Oriole Products Co.
Rent revenue $6,520 Sales discounts $8,240
Interest expense 13,460 Selling expenses 99,440
Beginning retained earnings 114,900 Sales revenue 407,700
Ending retained earnings 134,130 Income tax expense 25,015
Dividend revenue 71,910 Cost of goods sold 188,927
Sales returns and allowances 12,910 Administrative expenses 75,820
Allocation to noncontrolling interest 20,040
From the foregoing, compute the following:
a.Total net revenue:_________
b. Net income:__________
c. Income attributable to controlling stockholders:___________
Answer:
a. Sales revenue 407700
Sales discounts 8240
Sales returns and allowances 12910 (21150)
Net sales 386,550
Rent revenue 6520
Dividend revenue 71910
Total net revenue $464980
b. Total net revenue $464980
Less: Expenses
Cost of goods sold 188927
Selling expenses 99440
Administrative expenses 75820
Interest expense 13460
Income tax expense 25015 $402662
Net income $62318
(c) Total consolidated net income $62318
Less: Allocation to noncontrolling interest $20040
Income attributable to controlling $42278
stockholders
Gnomes R Us just paid a dividend of $1.90 per share. The company has a dividend payout ratio of 25 percent. If the PE ratio is 16.9 times, what is the stock price
Answer:
Stock price=$128.44
Explanation:
Calculation for stock price
First step is to calculate for dividend payout ratio using this formula
Dividend payout ratio=Dividend payout/Earnings
Let plug in the formula
Earnings=($1.90/0.25)
Earnings=$7.6
Now let calculate for PE ratio using this formula
PE ratio=Stock price/EPS
Let plug in the formula
Stock price=$7.6*16.9times
Stock price=$128.44
Therefore Stock price will be $128.44
Performance Obligation Fulfilled Over Time Philbrick Company signed a three-year contract to develop custom sales training materials and provide training to the employees of Elliot Company. The contract price is $1,100 per employee and the number of employees to be trained is 500. Philbrick can send a bill to Elliot at the end of every training session. Once developed, the custom training materials will belong to Elliot Company, but Philbrick does not consider them to be a separate performance obligation. The expected number to be trained in each year and the expected development and training costs follow. Number of employees Development and training costs incurred
2019
150 $
55,000
2020
250
70,000
2021
100
20,000
Total 500 $145,000
For each year, compute the revenue, expense, and gross profit reported assuming revenue is recognized over time using... 1. the number of employees trained as a measure of the value provided to the customer. Note: Round answers to the nearest dollar.
Answer:
Philbrick Company
Performance Obligation Fulfilled Over Time
Computation of the revenue, expense, and gross profit:
Year Number of Development Sales Gross
Employees /Training Cost Value Profit
2019 150 $ 55,000 $165,000 $110,000
2020 250 70,000 275,000 205,000
2021 100 20,000 110,000 90,000
Total 500 $145,000 $550,000 $405,000
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Contract price = $1,100 per employee
No. of employees to be trained = 500
Total contract value = $550,000 ($1,100 * 500)
Expected Development and Training Costs:
Year Number of Development
Employees /Training Cost
2019 150 $ 55,000
2020 250 70,000
2021 100 20,000
Total 500 $145,000
Label the statements regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as true or false.
a. The ACA establishes a national healthcare system for the United States in which the government rather than insurance companies pays for all health related expenses.
b. Under the ACA, the government has the right to fine employers or individuals for not having or providing health insurance.
c. Assume the ACA is in effect. A health insurance company is looking over a prospective individual, Alfred, and finds that Alfred goes cliff diving regularly, which was the cause of his past six concussions. He now suffers from frequent headaches. The insurance company can deny
Alfred coverage because of his preexisting medical condition.
d. To fund the ACA, new taxes will be imposed on items including medical devices and indoor tanning.
e. Under the ACA, until age 26, you can be covered under your parent's health insurance policy.
Answer:
a. FALSE
Both Employers and Employees do most of the paying not the Federal government which only steps in for subsidies to lower income households.
b. TRUE
The Government can indeed fine employers or individuals for not having or providing health insurance.
c. FALSE
They cannot deny him coverage based on his pre-existing medical condition as a result of the ACA and neither can they charge higher premiums.
d. TRUE
Funding the ACA will need the Government to raise more revenue and they plan to do so by imposing new taxes on items including medical devices and indoor tanning.
e. TRUE.
A person under the age of 26 is to be a dependent under this Act and this includes married people under the age of 26 as well as unmarried.
Appendix 1: Gross and net methods for sales discounts
The following were selected from among the transactions completed by Strong Retail Group during August of the current year:
Aug. 5. Sold merchandise on account to M. Quinn, $7,500, terms 2/10, n/30. The
cost of the merchandise sold was $4,200.
9. Sold merchandise on account to R. Busch., $4,000, terms 1/10, n/30. The
cost of the merchandise sold was $2,100.
15. Received payment on account for the sale of August 5 less the discount.
20. Sold merchandise on account to S. Mooney, $6,000, terms n/eom. The
cost of the merchandise sold was $3,300.
25. Received payment on account for the sale of August 9. 31.Received
payment on account for the sale of August 20.
A. Journalize the August transactions using the gross method of recording sales discounts.
Aug. 5 Accounts Receivable-M. Quinn 7,500
Sales 7,500
Cost of Goods Sold 4,200
Inventory 4,200
Accounts Receivable-R. Busch 4,000
Sales 4,000
Cost of Goods Sold 2,100
B. Journalize the August transactions using the net method of recording sales discounts.
Answer: Check attachment
Explanation:
A . Journalize the August transactions using the gross method of recording sales discounts
Kindly check the attachment for the solution.
B. Journalize the August transactions using the net method of recording sales discounts.
Check attachment.
Consider a project to supply Detroit with 20,000 tons of machine screws annually for automobile production. You will need an initial $3,000,000 investment in threading equipment to get the project started; the project will last for four years. The accounting department estimates that annual fixed costs will be $850,000 and that variable costs should be $450 per ton; accounting will depreciate the initial fixed asset investment straight-line to zero over the four-year project life. It also estimates a salvage value of $280,000 after dismantling costs. The marketing department estimates that the automakers will let the contract at a selling price of $600 per ton. The engineering department estimates you will need an initial net working capital investment of $300,000. You require a return of 18 percent and face a marginal tax rate of 38 percent on this project.
Required:
a. What is the estimated OCF for this project?
b. Suppose you believe that the accounting department’s initial cost and salvage value projections are accurate only to within ±15 percent; the marketing department’s price estimate is accurate only to within ±10 percent; and the engineering department’s net working capital estimate is accurate only to within ±5 percent. What is your worst-case and best-case scenario for this project?
Answer:
a) expected revenue = 20,000 tons x $600 = $12,000,000 per year
initial investment = $3,000,000 + $300,000 = $3,300,000
contribution margin per unit = $600 - $450 = $150
total contribution margin = $150 x 20,000 = $3,000,000
annual fixed costs = $850,000
depreciation expense per year = $750,000
tax rate = 38%
required return rate = 18%
after tax salvage value = $280,000 x (1 - 38%) = $173,600
NCF₀ = -$3,300,000
NCF₁ = [($3,000,000 - $850,000 - $750,000) x 0.62] + $750,000 = $1,618,000
NCF₂ = $1,618,000
NCF₃ = $1,618,000
NCF₄ = $1,618,000 + $300,000 + $173,600 = $2,091,600
NPV = $1,296,797.61
IRR = 36.36%
b) our best case scenario:
expected revenue = 20,000 tons x $660 = $13,200,000 per year
initial investment = $2,550,000 + $285,000 = $2,835,000
contribution margin per unit = $660 - $450 = $210
total contribution margin = $210 x 20,000 = $4,200,000
annual fixed costs = $850,000
depreciation expense per year = $637,500
tax rate = 38%
required return rate = 18%
after tax salvage value = $322,000 x (1 - 38%) = $199,640
NCF₀ = -$2,835,000
NCF₁ = [($4,200,000 - $850,000 - $637,500) x 0.62] + $637,500 = $2,319,250
NCF₂ = $2,319,250
NCF₃ = $2,319,250
NCF₄ = $2,319,250 + $285,000 + $199,640 = $2,803,890
NPV = $3,655,445.13
IRR = 74.34%
our worst case scenario:
expected revenue = 20,000 tons x $540 = $10,800,000 per year
initial investment = $3,450,000 + $315,000 = $3,765,000
contribution margin per unit = $540 - $450 = $90
total contribution margin = $90 x 20,000 = $1,800,000
annual fixed costs = $850,000
depreciation expense per year = $862,500
tax rate = 38%
required return rate = 18%
after tax salvage value = $238,000 x (1 - 38%) = $147,560
NCF₀ = -$3,765,000
NCF₁ = [($1,800,000 - $850,000 - $862,500) x 0.62] + $862,500 = $916,750
NCF₂ = $916,750
NCF₃ = $916,750
NCF₄ = $916,750 + $315,000 + $147,560 = $1,379,310
NPV = -$1,060,302.54
IRR = 3.56%
The price of oil in international markets has dropped stunningly 60% in the past twelve months. Among the factors mentioned behind this drastic fall is the millions of barrels of oil produced in the US called shale oil and analyze:
a. The market struc ture for oil industry.
b. The supply and demand for oil in that market structure.
c. The pricing of oil at the presence of OPEC and the role of Speculators.
d. Why shale oil is a substitute for oil and explain the news in regard to the Cross elasticity of demand.
Answer:
a. The market structure for oil industry.
The market structure is monopolistic competition: there are many competitors, that hold some market power, but not as much as in oligopoly. The good that is offered is not as homogenous as in agricultural markets, and this is the reason why it is not a perfect-competition structure either.
b. The supply and demand for oil in that market structure.
Supply and demand is determined more or less freely in the market. Producers hold some market power so they charge a price that is a bit higher than the marginal cost, which would be the price in a perfect competition structure.
Consumers also have power in the demand curve because they have a fair number of options.
c. The pricing of oil at the presence of OPEC and the role of Speculators.
The OPEC forms an oligopoly, however, not all countries that produce oil are members of the OPEC, and this is why the market structure as a whole is not an oligopoly, but monopolistic competition.
Speculators can drive prices, but their influence is marginal in comparison to consumers as a whole.
d. Why shale oil is a substitute for oil and explain the news in regard to the Cross elasticity of demand.
Shale oil is a substitute because it offers the same service: providing energy, and serving as a chemical component of many products.
As for the cross elasticity of demand, this means that when the price of oil increases, the demand for shale oil increases, because people flock to the substitute.
Pham can work as many or as few hours as she wants at the college bookstore for $12 per hour. But due to her hectic schedule, she has just 15 hours per week that she can spend working at either the bookstore or other potential jobs. One potential job, at a café, will pay her $15 per hour for up to 6 hours per week. She has another job offer at a garage that will pay her $13 an hour for up to 5 hours per week. And she has a potential job at a daycare center that will pay her $11.50 per hour for as many hours as she can work.
If her goal is to maximize the amount of money she can make each week, how many hours will she work at the bookstore?
Answer:
4 hours
Explanation:
For Pham to maximize her income, she must consider the jobs with the highest per-hour earnings first. She has 15 hours to work. Her priorities should be as below.
Work at the cafe for 6 hours for $15 per hourWork at the garage for 5 hours for $13 per hourWork at the books store for 4 hours for $12 per hourA total of 15 hours. Pham can work at the book store for 4 hours per week to maximize her income.
Pham will have to work 4 hour per week at the bookstore to maximize her pay.
Given data
Total number of hours available per week = 15 hours
Cafe will pay her $15 per hour up to 6 hoursGarage offers $13 per hour up to 5 hoursDycare Centre offers $11.50 per hours for as long as she can workOut of the potential job, only the cafe and garage centre pay is more than the pay of bookstore
Hence, in order to maximize the amount of money, Pham have to devote 6 hours at the cafe, 5 hours at the garage centre and remaining 4 hours at bookstore,
In this way, the amount of money she will receives will be at maximum.
Working at Cafe she will make $15 * 6 = $90 Working at Garage centre she will make $13 * 5 = $65Working at Bookstore she will make $12*4 = $48Total amount she will earn = $90 + $65 + $48
Total amount she will earn = $203
Therefore, Pham will have to work 4 hour per week at the bookstore to maximize her pay.
Read more about pay maximization
brainly.com/question/10880329
why do organizations identify their opportunities and threats??
Answer:
So they know what do when they fight back or attack
In 1998, the Russian government defaulted on its bonds. According to the open-economy macroeconomic model, this should have
Answer:
An increase in the net export and Russian interest rate.
Explanation: An open economy is an economy where all players which includes traders, investors and other stakeholders in the economy both within and outside the economy freely conduct their businesses and are controlled by market forces with minimal interference by Government agencies.
According to the open-economy macroeconomic model with the defaulting by the Russian government in 1998 will definitely lead to an increase in net export and an increase in Russian Interest rate.
In 2010, Toyota recalled millions of automobiles to fix a potentially hazardous problem known as sudden acceleration. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, James Stewart gave investors the following advice: "Toyota shares were over $90 as recently as Jan. 19, 2010. They closed Tuesday (February 02, 2010) at $78.18, which strikes me as a modest decline under the circumstances. If I owned shares, I’d seize the chance to get out.
Required:
Would a believer in the efficient markets theory be likely to follow Stewart's advice?
Answer:
Of course not. Someone that believes in the efficient market theory (or hypothesis as it is generally called), believes that the market is always right. As an individual investor, you might be right or wrong, but the market as a whole has access to perfect information and the price of each stock already has been determined factoring all possible events and outcomes. I.e. the market's price is always the correct price and there is no way in which an individual investor can make a profit by buying or selling undervalued or overvalued stocks.
Personally, I disagree with this hypothesis, and the reason why most people call is a hypothesis is that they disagree with it. If the market is always right, then this theory is no good.
Pearl Co. both purchases and constructs various equipment it uses in its operations. The following items for two different types of equipment were recorded in random order during the calendar year 2017.
Purchase
Cash paid for equipment, including sales tax of $6,200 $130,200
Freight and insurance cost while in transit 2,480
Cost of moving equipment into place at factory 3,844
Wage cost for technicians to test equipment 4,960
Insurance premium paid during first year of operation on this equipment 1,860
Special plumbing fixtures required for new equipment 9,920
Repair cost incurred in first year of operations related to this equipment 1,612
Construction
Material and purchased parts (gross cost $248,000; failed to take 2% cash discount) $248,000
Imputed interest on funds used during construction (stock financing) 17,360
Labor costs 235,600
Allocated overhead costs (fixed-$24,800; variable-$37,200) 62,000
Profit on self-construction 37,200
Cost of installing equipment 5,456
Compute the total cost for each of these two pieces of equipment.
Purchase equipment $_____
Construction equipment $_____
Answer:
i. The total cost for Purchase equipment
Particulars Amount
Cash paid for equipment, including $130,200
sales tax of $6,200
Freight and insurance cost while $2,480
in transit
Cost of moving equipment into $3,844
place at factory
Wage cost for technicians to test $4,960
equipment
Special plumbing fixtures required for $9,920
new equipment
Total Purchase cost $151,404
ii.The total cost of construction price of equipment
Particulars Amount
Material and purchase part $245,520
Labor Cost $235,600
Overhead Cost $62,000
Cost of Installing equipment $5,456
total cost of construction price of equipment $548,576
Workings
Material and purchased parts = Gross cost - Cash discount on gross cost
=$248,000 - (1%*$248,000)
=$248,000 - $2480
=$245,520
Banana Computer Company sells Banana Computers both in the domestic and foreign markets. Because of the differences in the power supplies, a Banana computer purchased in one market cannot be used in the other market. This means that the company can use third degree price discrimination in order to maximize profits. Let’s suppose that it costs $1,000 to produce each computer (this is marginal and average cost). Let’s suppose further that the domestic and foreign demand curves are given as follows (the subscript "F" denotes "foreign" while the subscript "D" is used to denote "domestic"):
PD=13,000 -20QD
PF= 17,000-40QF
Required:
a. What prices maximize profits for this firm? How many computers do they sell in each market? How much profit does the company earn?
b. Now, suppose that somebody figured out a wiring trick that allows a Banana computer built for either market to be costlessly converted so that it works in the other market. This destroys the company's ability to practice third degree price discrimination and forces them to charge the same price in both markets. What price maximizes the company's profits now? How many computers will they sell in each location? How much profit does the company earn?
Answer:
with price discrimination
Domestic Price 7,000 Quantity 300
Profit (7,000 - 1,000) * 300 = 1,800,000
Foreing Price 9,000 Quantity 200
Profit (9,000 - 1,000) * 200 = 1,600,000
Total 1,600,000 + 1,800,000 = 3,400,000
no price discrimination:
Price 7,667 Quantity 500
Profit (7,667 - 1,000) x 500 = 3,333,500
Explanation:
Sales Revenue (Domestic)
[tex]R = P \times Q_d = (13,000 - 20Q_d) \times Q_d = -20Q_d^2 + 13,000Q_d\\R' = \frac{dR_{(q)}}{dq} = 13,000 - 40Q_d[/tex]
We now equalice against Marginal Cost:
13,000 - 40Qd = 1,000
Qd = 12,000/40 = 300
Price: 13,000 - 20(300) = 7,000
We do the same process with Foreing demand:
(17,000 - 40Qf) x Qf = -40Qf^2 + 17,000Qf
R' = -80Qf + 17,000
-80Qf + 17,000 = 1,000
Qf = 16,000/80 = 200
Pf = 17,000 - 40(200) = 9,000
If the company cannot do price discrimination then:
We solve for the inverse of both market:
PD=13,000 -20QD
QD = 650 - PD/20
we take the price restrictions:
PD < 13,000
PF= 17,000-40QF
QF = (17,000 - PF)/40 = 425
QF = 425 - PF/40
PF < 17,000
Now, we aggregate the demands:
(650 -P/20 ) + (425 -P/40) =
Q= 1,075 - 0.075P
Make the inverse
P = (1,075 - Q ) / 0.075 = 14.333,33 -13.33Q
And solve for the Quantiy and Price that maximize profit
R = (14.333,33 -13.33Q) x Q = -13.33Q^2 + 14,333.33Q
R' = R(q)/dq = -26.66Q + 14,333.33
-26.66Q + 14,333.33 = 1,000
Q = 500
P = 14,333.33 - 13.33(500) = 7,667
The nature of a firm's cost (fixed or variable) depends on the Select one: a. firm's revenues. b. time horizon under consideration. c. price the firm charges for output. d. explicit but not implicit costs.
Answer:
B)time horizon under consideration.
Explanation:
firm's total cost of production can be regarded as the summation of both the fixed cost as well as the variable cost). It is all expenditures utilized in getting the needed factors of production( land, capital as well as labor)
Fixed cost known as overhead cost such as rent, insurance are expenses in the business that donor depends on the level of products(goods/service) from the business. While variable cost are cost that changes with production volume, they cover the cost of raw material used, direct labor as so on.It should be noted that The nature of a firm's cost (fixed or variable) depends on the time horizon under consideration
Midland Petroleum is holding a stockholders’ meeting next month. Ms. Ramsey is the president of the company and has the support of the existing board of directors. All 12 members of the board are up for reelection. Mr. Clark is a dissident stockholder. He controls proxies for 42,001 shares. Ms. Ramsey and her friends on the board control 52,001 shares. Other stockholders, whose loyalties are unknown, will be voting the remaining 24,998 shares. The company uses cumulative voting.
Required:
a. How many directors can Mr. Clark be sure of electing?
b. How many can Ms Rmasey be sure of electing
c. How many votes could clark have if he had all the uncommitted votes
d. Does that give him control?
e. If nine directors were to be elected, and Ms. Ramsey and her friends had 70,001 shares and Mr. Clark had 48,001 shares plus half the uncommitted votes, how many directors could Mr. Clark elect?
Answer:
Midland Petroleum
a. Mr. Clark can be sure of electing = 4 directors
b. Ms Ramsey can be sure of electing = 5 directors
c. If Mr. Clark had all the uncommitted votes, he can elect = 7 directors
d. With 7 directors, he has control.
e. Mr. Clark can elect (60,50/143,000 * 9) = 4 directors.
Explanation:
Board members = 12
Mr. Clark control = 42,001 shares or 35.295%
Ms. Ramsey control = 52,001 shares or 43.698%
Undecided shareholders = 24,998 shares or 21.01%
Total shareholding = 119,000 shares or 100%
Mr. Clark can elect = 35.295% of directors = 4
Ms. Ramsey can elect = 43.698% of directors = 5
Other shareholders can elect = 21.01% of directors = 3
New shareholding:
Ms. Ramsey and friends = 70,001 shares
Mr. Clark and half uncommitted votes = 60,500 (48,001 + 12,499)
Half of the other uncommitted votes = 12,499
Total votes = 143,000
Mr. Clark can elect (60,50/143,000 * 9) = 4 directors.
Molly Grey (single) acquired a 30 percent limited partnership interest in Beau Geste LLP several years ago for $56,000. At the beginning of year 1, Molly has tax basis and an at-risk amount of $20,000. In year 1, Beau Geste incurs a loss of $187,500 and does not make any distributions to the partners.
-In year 1, Molly's AGI (excluding any income or loss from Beau Geste) is $67,800. This includes $13,800 of passive income from other passive activities.
-In year 2, Beau Geste earns income of $38,400. In addition, Molly contributes an additional $31,380 to Beau Geste during year 2. Molly's AGI in year 2 is $71,700 (excluding any income or loss from Beau Geste). This amount includes $10,160 in income from her other passive investments.
Based on the above information, complete the following tables: (Leave no answers blank. Enter zero if applicable.) What are the cumulative total passive suspended losses at the end of year 2?
Answer:
$20,770
Explanation:
Share of passive loss in year 1
[187,500 × 30%]
$56,250
Less: Passive income from other activities
($13,800)
Suspended loss in year 1
$42,450
Less: Share of passive income from Beau Geste in year 2 (38,400 × 30%).
($11,520)
Less passive income from other activities
($10,160)
Cumulative total passive suspended losses at the end of year 2.
$20,770
Camille Sikorski was divorced last year. She currently provides a home for her 15-year-old daughter, Kaly, and 18-year-old son, Parker. Both children lived in Camille’s home, which she owns, for the entire year, and Camille paid for all the costs of maintaining the home. She received a salary of $55,000 and contributed $4,200 of it to a qualified retirement account (a for AGI deduction). She also received $6,000 of alimony from her former husband. Finally, Camille paid $2,700 of expenditures that qualified as itemized deductions.
a. What is Camille’s taxable income?
b. What would Camille’s taxable income be if she incurred $9,800 of itemized deductions instead of $2,700?
c. Assume the original facts but now suppose Camille’s daughter, Kaly, is 25 years old and a full-time student. Kaly’s gross income for the year was $5,300. Kaly provided $3,180 of her own support, and Camille provided $5,300 of support. What is Camille’s taxable income?
#6 is it Greater of standard deduction or itemized deduction or is it Lesser of standard deduction or itemized deduction
Description Amount
1) Gross income
2) For AGI deductions
3) Adjused gross income $
4) Standard deduction
5) Itemized deductions
6)
7) Personal and dependency exemptions
8) Total deductions from AGI $
Taxable income
Answer:
Uhhh is there any sources?
Explanation:
Ida Company produces a handcrafted musical instrument called a gamelan that is similar to a xylophone. The gamelans are sold for $722. Selected data for the company’s operations last year follow:
Units in beginning inventory 0
Units produced 23,000
Units sold 20,000
Units in ending inventory 3,000
Variable costs per unit:
Direct materials $180
Direct labor $340
Variable manufacturing overhead $51
Variable selling and administrative $18
Fixed costs:
Fixed manufacturing overhead $940,000
Fixed selling and administrative $820,000
Required:
a. Assume that the company uses absorption costing. Compute the unit product cost for one gamelan.
b. Assume that the company uses variable costing. Compute the unit product cost for one gamelan.
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable. The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.
The variable costing method incorporates all variable production costs (direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead).
Absorption costing:
Unitary fixed overhead= 940,000/23,000= $40.87
Unitary production cost= 180 + 340 + 51 +40.87
Unitary production cost= $610.87
Variable costing:
Unitary production cost= 180 + 340 + 51
Unitary production cost=$571
The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production and variable costs includes all variable production costs.
What are absorption costs?
Absorption costs, also known as absorption costs, are a management calculation method that combines both highly flexible and adjusted cost to produce a particular product.
Knowing the full cost of production per unit enables manufacturers to price their products.
Calculation of Production costs assuming that the method of Absorption costing:
[tex]\rm\,Unitary \;Fixed \;Overhead= \dfrac{\$940,000}{23,000}\\\\Unitary \;Fixed \;Overhead== \$40.87 \;per \;unit\\\\Unitary \;Production \;Cost= (180 + 340 + 51 +40.87)\\\\Unitary \; Production \;Cost= \$610.87[/tex]
b) Calculation of production costs by variable costing method:
[tex]\rm\,Unitary \; Production \;Cost= (\$180 +\$340 + \$51)\\\\Unitary \;Production \;Cost=\$571[/tex]
Hence, The unit product cost for one gamelan by applying absorption costing is $610.87 and by variable costing is $571.
Learn more about Absorption costing:
https://brainly.com/question/15878088
Mickey, Mickayla, and Taylor are starting a new business (MMT). To get the business started, Mickey is contributing $200,000 for a 40% ownership interest. Mickayla is contributing a building with a value of $200,000 and a tax basis of $150,000 for a 40% ownership interest, and Taylor is contributing legal services for a 20% ownership interest. Using the research skills you learned in Week 1, access RIA Checkpoint and research what amount of gain/income each owner is required to recognize under each of the following alternative situations?
a. MMT is formed as a C corporation.
b. MMT is formed as an S corporation.
c. MMT is formed as LLC.
Answer:
a. MMT is formed as a C corporation.
Mickey and Mickayla will not recognize any gain, while Taylor must recognize $100,000 as ordinary income. Mickey and Mickayla's exchange classifies under §351, but Taylor's doesn't.
b. MMT is formed as an S corporation.
Mickey and Mickayla will not recognize any gain, while Taylor must recognize $100,000 as ordinary income. Mickey and Mickayla's exchange classifies under §351, but Taylor's doesn't.
c. MMT is formed as LLC.
Mickey and Mickayla will not recognize any gain, while Taylor must recognize $100,000 as ordinary income. Mickey and Mickayla's exchange classifies under §721, but Taylor's doesn't.
Explanation:
Basically §351 and §721 are very similar except that one applies to corporations and the other applies to partnerships and LLCs. No gain will be recognize when assets are transferred in exchange for equity, and the people involved in the exchange can control the company.
Darby Company, operating at full capacity, sold 500,000 units at a price of $94 per unit during the current year. Its income statement is as follows:
Sales $47,000,000
Cost of goods sold 25,000,000
Gross profit $22,000,000
Expenses:
Selling expenses $4,000,000
Administrative expenses 3,000,000
Total expenses 7,000,000
Income from operations $15,000,000
The division of costs between variable and fixed is as follows:
Variable Fixed
Cost of goods sold 70% 30%
Selling expenses 75% 25%
Administrative expenses50% 50%
Management is considering a plant expansion program for the following year that will permit an increase of $3,760,000 in yearly sales. The expansion will increase fixed costs by $1,800,000 but will not affect the relationship between sales and variable costs.
Required:
1. Determine the total variable costs and the total fixed costs for the current year.
Total variable costs $_____
Total fixed costs $_____
2. Determine (a) the unit variable cost and (b) the unit contribution margin for the current year.
Unit variable cost $_____
Unit contribution margin $_____
3. Compute the break-even sales (units) for the current year.
4. Compute the break-even sales (units) under the proposed program for the following year.
5. Determine the amount of sales (units) that would be necessary under the proposed program to realize the $15,000,000 of income from operations that were earned in the current year.
6. Determine the maximum income from operations possible with the expanded plant.
7. If the proposal is accepted and sales remain at the current level, what will the income or loss from operations be for the following year?
8. Based on the data given, would you recommend accepting the proposal?
a. In favor of the proposal because of the reduction in break-even point.
b. In favor of the proposal because of the possibility of increasing income from operations.
c. In favor of the proposal because of the increase in break-even point.
d. Reject the proposal because if future sales remain at the current level, the income from operations will increase.
e. Reject the proposal because the sales necessary to maintain the current income from operations would be below the current year sales.
Answer:
1. Determine the total variable costs and the total fixed costs for the current year.
Total variable costs = $17,500,000 + $3,000,000 + $1,500,000 = $22,000,000 Total fixed costs = $10,000,0002. Determine (a) the unit variable cost and (b) the unit contribution margin for the current year.
Unit variable cost = $22,000,000 / 500,000 = $44 Unit contribution margin = $94 - $44 = $503. Compute the break-even sales (units) for the current year.
break even point = $10,000,000 / $50 = 200,000 units4. Compute the break-even sales (units) under the proposed program for the following year.
break even point = $11,800,000 / $50 = 236,000 units5. Determine the amount of sales (units) that would be necessary under the proposed program to realize the $15,000,000 of income from operations that were earned in the current year.
units = ($11,800,000 + $15,000,000) / $50 = 536,000 units6. Determine the maximum income from operations possible with the expanded plant.
total units sold 500,000 + 40,000 = 540,000total contribution margin = 540,000 x $50 = $27,000,000operating income = $27,000,000 - $11,800,000 = $15,200,0007. If the proposal is accepted and sales remain at the current level, what will the income or loss from operations be for the following year?
operating income = (500,000 x $50) - $11,800,000 = $13,200,000represents a decrease of $15,000,000 - $13,200,000 = $1,800,0008. Based on the data given, would you recommend accepting the proposal?
b. In favor of the proposal because of the possibility of increasing income from operations.5. What are the advantages of relying solely on streaming services
for TV, what are the disadvantages?
HELP ME PLEASE I WILL GIVE YOJ BRAINLYIST
Answer:
By watching something live and streaming. Disadvantages is not wanting to watch what you want.
The adjusted trial balance of Norton Company contained the following information. Assume the tax rate is 25%:
Debit Credit
Sales revenue $390,000
Sales returns and allowances $10,000
Sales discounts 5,000
Cost of goods sold 200,000
Operating expenses 110,000
Interest revenue 8,000
Interest expense 3,000
Required:
Compute income from operations.
a. $175,000
b. $65,000
c. $50,000
d. $70,000
Answer:
b. $65,000
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Revenues
Service Revenue $390,000
Less: Sales Return and allowance $10,000
Less: Sales Discount $5,000
Net Sales Revenue $375,000
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $200,000
Gross Profit $175,000
Less: Operating Expenses $110,000
Operating Income $65,000
Thus, income from operation is $65,000
Bernie and Phil's Great American Surplus store placed an ad in the Sunday Times stating, "Next Saturday at 8:00 A.M. sharp 3 brand new mink coats worth $5,000 each will be sold for $500 each! First come, First served." Marsha LufMin was first in line when the store opened and went directly to the coat department, but the coats identified in the ad were not available for sale. She identified herself to the manager and pointed out that she was first in line in conformity with the store's advertised offer and that she was ready to pay the $500 price set forth in the store's offer. The manager responded that a newspaper ad is just an invitation to negotiate and that the store decided to withdraw "the mink coat promotion." Review the text on unilateral contracts in Section 12(b) of Chapter 12. Decide.
Answer:
This technique is called "bait and switch", it is illegal and is considered false advertising. A seller cannot falsely advertise a product and then simply say that they do not have it on stock. It is a type of sales fraud and it is prohibited by the Lanham Act.
In order for this situation to be considered legal, the seller must have advertised and sold a certain amount of coats, but it didn't sell any. I.e. the seller runs out of stock because it already sold the 3 coats.
Managers must be able to determine whether their workers are doing an effective and efficient job, with a minimum of errors and disruptions. They do so by using a performance appraisal, an evaluation that measures employee performance against established standards in order to make decisions about promotions, compensation, training, or termination. Managing effectively means getting results through top performance. That's what performance appraisals at all levels of the organization are for—including at the top, where managers benefit from review by their subordinates. In the 360-degree review, management gathers opinions from all around the employee, including those under, above, and on the same level, to get an accurate, comprehensive idea of the worker's abilities.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
This system of performance review is a 360-degree review or feedback process where a given employee receives inputs on her performance (or other criteria such as behaviors, competencies and results achieved) from different employees with varying working relationships and at different levels. The idea is to ensure that the employee's performance is not partial or biased. Using this system, the employee who may be a manager will have her performance reviewed by employees below, above, and on the same level with her.
Piere Imports uses the perpetual system in accounting for merchandise inventory and had the following transactions during the month of October.
Oct. 2 Purchased merchandise at a $4,700 price ($4,606 net), invoice dated October 2, terms 2/10, n/30.
10 Received a credit memorandum toward the return of $850 ($833 net) of merchandise that it purchased on October 2.
17 Purchased merchandise at a $8,800 price ($8,624 net), invoice dated October 17, terms 2/10, n/30.
27 Paid for the merchandise purchased on October 17, less the discount.
31 Paid for the merchandise purchased on October 2. (Payment was mistakenly delayed, which caused the discount to be lost.)
Required:
Prepare entries to record these transactions assuming that Piere Imports records invoices (a) at gross amounts and (b) at net amounts.
Answer:
Entries and their narrations are posted below
Explanation:
We will record assets and expenses on the debit as they increase during the year and will record liabilities and capital on the credit side as they increase during the year or vice versa.
October 2 Purchased merchandise at a $4,700 price ($4,606 net), invoice dated
GROSS NET
Dr Merchandise inventory $4,700 $4,606
Cr Account payable $4,700 $4,606
October 10 Received a credit memorandum toward the return of $850 ($833 net)
GROSS NET
Dr Account payable $850 $833
C Inventory $850 $833
October 17 Purchased merchandise at a $8,800 price ($8,624 net), invoice dated October 17,
GROSS NET
Dr Merchandise inventory $8,800 $8,624
Cr Account payable $8,800 $8,624
October 27 Paid for the merchandise purchased on October 17, less the discount.
Dr Account payable 8,800
Cr Discount 176
Cr Cash 8,624
October 31 Paid for the merchandise purchased on October 2.
Dr Account payable 4,700
Cr Cash 4,700
A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $12,600 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1,400. A new power line will cost $11,000 to install, with power costs expected to be $800 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 10% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis?
Answer:
Since the total future worth of running an electric line of $19,353.42 is less than the total future worth of solar cells is $24,132.22, it implies that it will be cheaper to run an electric line than to use solar cells. Therefore, running an electric line should be selected.
Explanation:
The future worth analysis refers to an act of determining what the the worth of present amount of money or stream of money invested at an interest rate will after in some period or years to come.
To determine which one to select between solar cells and running an electric line, the we need to calculate the future worth of both and compared as follows:
a. Calculation of future value of solar cells
Calculation of future worth of $12,600 installation cost
FW of $12,600 = PW of $12,600 * (1 + r)^n ................ (1)
Where;
FW of $12,600 = Future worth of $12,600 installation cost = ?
PW of $12,600 = Present worth of $12,600 installation cost = $12,600
r = interest rate = 10%, or 0.10
n = number of years = 4
Substitute the values into equation (1), we have:
FW of $12,600 = $12,600 * (1 + 0.10)^4
FW of $12,600 = $12,600 * 1.4641
FW of $12,600 = $18,447.66
Calculation of future worth of annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. of $1,400
The future worth of annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. of $1,400 can also be calculated using the formula for calculating the Future Value (FV) of an Ordinary Annuity as follows:
FW of $1,400 = M * (((1 + r)^n - 1) / r) ................................. (2)
Where,
FW of $1,400 = Future value of Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. of $1,400 =?
M = Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. = $1,400
r = interest rate = 10%, or 0.10
n = number of years = 4
Substitute the values into equation (2), we have:
FW of $1,400 = $1,400 * (((1 + 0.01)^4 - 1) / 0.01)
FW of $1,400 = $1,400 * 4.060401
FW of $1,400 = $5,684.56
Calculation of total future worth of solar cells
This is calculated by simply adding the FW of $12,600 and FW of $1,400 as follows:
Total future worth of solar cells = FW of $12,600 + FW of $1,400 = $18,447.66 + $5,684.56 = $24,132.22
Therefore, the total future worth of solar cells is $24,132.22.
b. Calculation of future value of running an electric line
Calculation of future worth of $11,000 installation cost
FW of $11,000 = PW of $11,000 * (1 + r)^n ................ (3)
Where;
FW of $11,000 = Future worth of $11,000 installation cost = ?
PW of $11,000 = Present worth of $11,000 installation cost = $11,000
r = interest rate = 10%, or 0.10
n = number of years = 4
Substitute the values into equation (3), we have:
FW of $11,000 = $11,000 * (1 + 0.10)^4
FW of $11,000 = $11,000 * 1.4641
FW of $11,000 = $16,105.10
Calculation of future worth of expected annual power costs of $800
The future worth of expected annual power costs of $800 can also be calculated using the formula for calculating the Future Value (FV) of an Ordinary Annuity as follows:
FW of $800 = M * (((1 + r)^n - 1) / r) ................................. (4)
Where,
FW of $800 = Future value of expected annual power costs of $800 =?
M = Expected annual power costs = $800
r = interest rate = 10%, or 0.10
n = number of years = 4
Substitute the values into equation (4), we have:
FW of $800 = $800 * (((1 + 0.01)^4 - 1) / 0.01)
FW of $800 = $800 * 4.060401
FW of $800 = $3,248.32
Calculation of total future worth of running an electric line
This is calculated by simply adding the FW of $11,000 and FW of $800 as follows:
Total future worth of running an electric line = FW of $11,000 + FW of $800 = $16,105.10 + $3,248.32 = $19,353.42
Therefore, the total future worth of running an electric line is $19,353.42.
c. Conclusion
Since the total future worth of running an electric line of $19,353.42 is less than the total future worth of solar cells is $24,132.22, it implies that it will be cheaper to run an electric line than to use solar cells. Therefore, running an electric line should be selected.
A company has the following aging schedule of its accounts receivable with the estimated percent uncollectible:______.
Age Group Amount Receivable Estimated Percent Uncollectible
Not yet due $ 175,000 4 %
0-60 days past due $ 40,000 10 %
61-120 days past due $ 10,000 30 %
More than 120 days past due $ 5,000 60 %
Assuming the balance of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts is $3,000 (credit) before adjustment, which of the following would be recorded in the year-end adjusting entry?
Answer: $14,000
Explanation:
Estimated Uncollectibles = (4% * 175,000) + ( 10% * 40,000) + ( 30% * 10,000) + (60% * 5,000)
= 7,000 + 4,000 + 3,000 + 3,000
= $17,000
Balance before adjustment is a credit of $3,000 so the adjustment for the year is;
= 17,000 - 3,000
= $14,000