In order to assess if students who wear uniforms at this school tend to have better grade point averages (GPAs), the administrator of the school compares the GPAS of those students to those of those who do not. This statement is false.
It is not legal for a public school to require students to wear uniforms. Public schools have a constitutional obligation to respect the rights of students and their families, including their right to express themselves through their clothing choices.
It would be a violation of students' rights if the school were to mandate the wearing of uniforms. Additionally, comparing the GPAs of students who wear uniforms to those who do not wear uniforms to determine whether those wearing uniforms tend to have higher GPAs would be a violation of students' privacy rights.
To learn more about grade point averages
https://brainly.com/question/29774961
#SPJ4
all of the following are criteria for determining whether a country is a liberal democracy except 1 point
efficient decision making, people have a consistent set of preferences, obtain the information they need to make an informed decision, weigh their options, and select the course of action that best reflects their beliefs and values in a Liberal democracy.
Such choices are regarded as sensible because it is assumed that they will advance people's self-interest.
Given that research has amply demonstrated that political decision-making practically never adheres to these principles in practice, the rational choice approach is forced to deal with a dilemma.
People lack consistency in their opinions, misuse information, have excessive faith in their own judgment, fail to update previous assessments in light of new information, draw erroneous conclusions from incomplete information, and show prejudice.
To know more about liberal democracy
brainly.com/question/30167511
#SPJ4
All of the following are criteria for determining whether a country is a liberal democracy EXCEPT
A) competitive elections
B) efficient decision making
C) freedom of expression
D) multiple sources of information
E) peaceful transitions of power
What is Boyles Law and Charles Law?
Answer:Boyle's Law states that the pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume when the temperature is constant. Charles' Law states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature when the pressure is constant.
Explanation:
Boyle's Law, also known as the gas law, states that the pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume when the temperature is constant. This means that if the volume of a gas increases, the pressure of the gas decreases, and vice versa. Charles' Law, also known as the thermal expansion law, states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature when the pressure is constant. This means that if the temperature of a gas increases, the volume of the gas increases, and vice versa. Both laws are fundamental principles in thermodynamics and play an important role in understanding the behavior of gases.
To learn more about Boyles Law and Charles Law
https://brainly.com/question/3865172
https://brainly.com/question/12807582
is whistleblowing the same as reporting an unauthorized disclosure?
Unauthorized disclosure is not whistleblowing, it's a crime.
Consider being in a gym class where individuals are dispersed and not paying attention. The whistle is then blown by your teacher, and you hear that grating high-pitched noise. When they speak, everyone immediately turns to them to hear what they have to say.
The term "whistleblower" originates from that common response you and your peers have. the person who sounds the whistle, to which everyone responds. However, in this instance, they impart knowledge that the general public needs to know. Whistleblowing can be done for either governmental or private organizations. Whistleblowing may be done for a variety of reasons. Among them are monetary gain, exposing abusive behavior, avoiding guilt by omission, caring about other people, and caring about the general public.
To know more about whistleblower :
https://brainly.com/question/28319822
#SPJ4
Is Mein Kampf available for Kindle?
The Kindle edition of Hitler, Adolf, Abraham Foxman, and Ralph Manheim's Mein Kampf Amazon.com has Kindle eBooks on politics and social sciences. HarperCollins Publishers distributes it.
Where can I purchase Mein Kampf?States of America Because it is protected by the freedom of speech and freedom of the press clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Mein Kampf is accessible in many community libraries and bookshops in the country.
Is Mein Kampf available in a library?I looked at www.worldcat.org, which showed hundreds of entries in the catalog for Hitler's book Mein Kampf in English alone, with one or more copies possibly listed under each entry. If they don't have a copy, you can request one from your local library or borrow one from another library if you want to read it.
To learn more about Kindle eBooks here:
https://brainly.com/question/14769924
#SPJ4
What does closed primary mean dictionary?
A primary election that does not require voters to be associated with a political party in order for them to vote for partisan candidates is known as an open primary.
Which two kinds of dictionaries are there?Also, all dictionaries can be described as either descriptive or prescriptive, and some of them try to be both. A prescriptive dictionary specifies how a word should be used, whereas a descriptive dictionary attempts to describe how a word is used.
Which three kinds of dictionaries are there?Dictionaries come in many different varieties. Monolingual, bilingual, and bilingualized are the three main types. Additionally, there are thesauruses, which are similar to but distinct from dictionaries. Word definitions are provided in a single language in a monolingual dictionary.
To learn more about primary election here:
https://brainly.com/question/12228045
#SPJ4
What did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists believe about government?
Conflict erupted around ratification, with Anti-federalists opposed to the formation of a strong national government and rejected ratification, while federalists favored a strong coalition and through the Constitution.
Anti-federalism was a political movement of the late 18th century that opposed the creation of a stronger federal government by the United States and subsequently opposed the ratification of the Constitution in 1787. called the Permanent Articles of Confederation and Confederation, gave more powers to the state governments.
Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, the anti-federalists feared, among other things, that the presidential office, when it was a novelty, might develop into a monarchy. Although the Constitution was ratified and superseded the Articles of Confederation, the influence of anti-federalism contributed to the adoption of the Bill of Rights. The name "anti-federalists" is a misnomer.
To know more about Anti-Federalists here-
https://brainly.com/question/28622723
#SPJ4
is the reincarnation of the strongest exorcist in another world
"The Reincarnation of the Strongest Exorcist in Another World" is a is a Japanese novel series written by Kiichi Kosuzu and illustrated by Shiso and Kihiro Yuzuki.
Reincarnation is the belief that after death, a person’s soul is reborn into a new body. This is often associated with the idea of an afterlife in which souls are sent to a different world, where they can start anew. This other world is often seen as a place of reward or punishment, depending on the actions taken in the previous life.
Reincarnation can be seen as a way of escaping the cycle of life and death, and a chance to experience something new in a different world. If you like anime and stories related to reincarnation then this novel is perfect for you.
To know more about exorcist, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30281010
#SPJ4
How specific is Article III about the structure of federal courts such as how many courts and judges there have to be?
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
In most legal systems, the supreme court is the highest court in the judicial system. These courts are also known as courts of last resort, supreme courts, and high courts of appeal. Generally, decisions of the supreme court are not subject to further review by other courts.
The supreme courts often act as appellate courts, hearing appeals from lower courts or intermediate appellate courts. However, not all supreme courts are so called. Most countries under civil law do not have a single supreme court.
To know more about Supreme Court here-
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Is the Wealth of the Wicked Laid Up For the Righteous?
"Wealth of the Wicked Laid Up For the Righteous", this scripture means that God has appointed a day when He will transfer the wealth of the wicked to the righteous.
Wicked and righteous are two terms that are often used to describe people's behavior and actions. Wickedness is seen as something that is morally wrong or evil, while righteousness is seen as something that is morally right and good. Wickedness is often associated with selfishness, greed, and dishonesty, while righteousness is associated with kindness, generosity, and honesty.
In many cultures, wickedness is seen as something that should be avoided, while righteousness is seen as something that should be sought after. The dichotomy between wicked and righteous is an important concept that has been explored in many different religions, philosophies, and cultures throughout history.
To know more about wealth, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29993986
#SPJ4
What did the Munich Agreement result in?
The Munich Agreement resulted in wherein the Germany would occupy the Sudetenland within 10 days and also the other parts of Czechoslovakia would go to Poland and Hungary.
On September 29–30, 1938, Italy, Germany, Britain, and France are said to have signed the Munich Agreement, so by which Czechoslovakia must surrender its border regions and defenses, which was the so-called Sudeten region to Nazi Germany.
However, the Munich Agreement was said to have an opportunity in order to stop the war and thus it did fail due to its weak predecessors and the strong pattern of appeasement which was towards Hitler.
To learn more about the Munich Agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/30122862
#SPJ4
what supreme court case set the precedent of judicial review?
Marbury v. Madison was the supreme court case set the precedent of judicial review.
The Supreme Court's ruling in this case established the courts' authority to check the constitutionality of the activities of the other two branches of the government.
Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle. This acted as a significant contribution to the "checks and balances" system designed to prevent any one branch of the federal government from becoming overly strong.
"A law that violates the Constitution is unenforceable." The Supreme Court for the first time deemed a legislation approved by Congress and signed by the President illegal with these words, which were penned by Chief Justice Marshall.
To know more about Marbury v. Madison, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29268440
#SPJ4
citizens must serve on juries to determine verdict, vote in elections. a. Truea. False
The Answer is a. True. Citizens must serve on juries to determine verdicts, and vote in elections
United States citizens have the obligation to vote in federal elections. However, there is no law that says citizens must vote.
And it is the responsibility of citizens to serve on a jury when they are asked.
These two are very important.
in a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether the united states should enact a compulsory voting law or let voting remain optional. be sure to address counterclaims in your essay and include reasons and evidence to support your argument.
Introduction:
The right to vote is a cornerstone of democracy and a fundamental right in the United States. However, voter turnout in the US is consistently lower compared to other democratic countries. One solution that has been proposed to increase voter participation is the implementation of a compulsory voting law, which would make voting mandatory for all eligible citizens. In this essay, I will argue that the United States should enact a compulsory voting law to increase voter turnout and strengthen our democracy.
One of the main arguments in favor of compulsory voting is that it would increase voter turnout. Studies have shown that countries with compulsory voting laws have significantly higher voter turnout rates than countries where voting is optional. For example, in Australia, which has a mandatory voting law, voter turnout is around 90%, while in the United States, voter turnout is typically around 60%. A higher voter turnout would ensure that a greater portion of the population is represented in the political process, leading to a more representative and legitimate government.
Another argument in favor of compulsory voting is that it would help to reduce the influence of money in politics. When voter turnout is low, special interest groups and wealthy donors have a greater impact on elections because they can influence a smaller number of voters. By increasing voter turnout, a compulsory voting law would dilute the influence of money in politics and make the political process more representative of the general population.
One potential counterargument to compulsory voting is that it could infringe on individual freedom and autonomy. Some argue that forcing citizens to vote would be a violation of their rights and that individuals should be able to make their own choices about whether or not to vote. Additionally, some argue that mandatory voting could lead to union
In conclusion, while mandatory voting may increase voter turnout, it raises several concerns about individual rights and democracy. Therefore, voting should remain optional in the United States.
To learn more about democracy Click
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
Congress wishes to enact legislation prohibiting discrimination in the sale or rental of housing on the basis of the affectional preference or sexual orientation of the potential purchaser or renter. Congress wishes this statute to apply to all public and private vendors and lessors of residential property in this country, with a few narrowly drawn exceptions.
The most credible argument for congressional authority to enact such a statute would be based upon the:
A. Commerce clause of Article I, Section 8, because in aggregate, the sale or rental of almost all housing in this country could reasonably be deemed to have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
B. General welfare clause of Article I, Section 8, because the conduct the statute prohibits could reasonably be deemed to be harmful to the national interest
C. Enforcement clause of the Thirteenth Amendment, because that amendment clearly prohibits discrimination against the class of persons protected by this statute.
D. Enforcement clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because thatamendment prohibits all public and private actors from engaging in irrational discrimination.
The Commerce clause of Article I, Section 8, because in aggregate, the sale or rental of almost all housing in this country could reasonably be deemed to have a substantial effect on interstate commerce - Option A is correct.
The Commerce Clause outlines one of the enumerated powers of the United States Constitution. The paragraph states that the United States Congress shall have the power "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Courts and pundits have frequently debated each of these three trade sectors separately as a congressional power. It is common to refer to the various components of the Commerce Clause by the names "Foreign-Commerce Clause," "Interstate-Commerce Clause," and "Indian-Commerce Clause." In the courts, there is disagreement over the extent of the authority granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause. The Necessary and Proper Clause is commonly used in conjunction with it, as is explained below.
To learn more about Commerce Clause click here
brainly.com/question/29973908
#SPJ4
amu lives with deep rooted colon cancer that is took care of by the nursing team in the ogy department of a general hospital in Addis Ababa, Black Lion Hospital. Habtamu diagnosed with colon cancer seven years ago but refused medical and surgical treatment - time. He chose to seek alternative treatment and did not follow up with the urologist hat seven year period. After several diagnostic tests over a period it was discovered that incer had metastasized to his bones, it had spread locally to his lymph nodes and the ry tumor was invading the bladder and partially obstructing the left kidney. Habtamu everal admissions over a two month period for various reasons. On the last admission was told that he may only have less than two months to live after oscopy showed further extensive growth of the tumor, it was determined that any r surgical medical intervention would not be appropriate in this case and that ative care regimen was the next step. At this point the patient reported to the health eam that he had resigned himself to the fact that he was going to die. Habtamu pulled the author's colleagues aside and confided to the nurse that he planned to kill himself at is was a secret that the nurse was not to tell anyone. Does the decision made by the t is moral or immoral? Why? If you were in the place of nurse what do you do?
The decision made by Habtamu to refuse medical and surgical treatment for his colon cancer, and instead seek alternative treatment, ultimately led to the deterioration of his condition and the belief that he only had a short time to live. The decision to seek alternative treatment may have been based on personal beliefs or mistrust of the medical system. However, this decision ultimately led to the progression of his cancer and the limited options for treatment at this stage.
The decision made by Habtamu to end his own life is a personal one and it is not for anyone to judge whether it is moral or immoral. However, as healthcare professionals, it is our duty to support and respect the patient's autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own health and well-being.
If I were in the place of the nurse, I would first try to understand the reasons behind Habtamu's decision to end his life and offer emotional support and resources for coping with his terminal illness. I would also inform the rest of the healthcare team about his decision and make sure that he receives appropriate palliative care, including pain management and emotional support. I would also consider connecting him with a counselor or a social worker to support him in his decision. Additionally, I would also make sure that the patient is aware of all the available options and the potential consequences of his decision, and provide him with the necessary information to make an informed decision.
A reduction in government borrowing can:
Question 19 options:
a)
decrease the incentive to invest.
b)
increase the interest rate.
c)
crowd out private investment in human capital.
d)
give private investment an opportunity to expand.
A reduction in government borrowing can give private investment an opportunity to expand.
The national government's borrowing has the most impact, while borrowing by lesser governments could also have a bearing.
It is only by borrowing from the private sector of the economy—from people, companies, and different financial organisations, including banks—is, strictly speaking, called government borrowing.
When the government borrows from the central bank (the Bank of England, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of Japan, or the Federal Reserve System in the United States), it is actually creating money rather than borrowing it because the central bank creates purchasing power but not obligations to the general public.
The lender offers the borrower money in exchange for government securities when a government borrows money.
To know more about private investment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871343
#SPJ4
What is the exclusionary rule, and what are its three primary purposes?
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Keep up the great work!
CRIMINOLOGY
How should our society respond to crime?
Answer:
Society's response to crime should be multi-faceted and involve a combination of methods. Some key elements of an effective response to crime include:
Criminal justice: Law enforcement agencies should investigate and prosecute criminal activities, and the courts should impose appropriate sentences for those who are convicted.Rehabilitation: Efforts should be made to rehabilitate offenders, including providing them with education, job training, and substance abuse treatment to help them reintegrate into society.Prevention: Strategies should be implemented to prevent crime before it occurs, such as community policing, youth development programs, and crime prevention education.Restorative justice: It aims to repair the harm caused by crime by bringing together the offender, the victim, and the community. It can provide a sense of closure and healing for both the victim and the offender, and help to reduce recidivism.Research-based policies: To reduce crime, society should invest in research to understand the causes of crime, and develop policies and programs that are based on evidence of what works.Overall, society's response to crime should be designed to ensure public safety, hold offenders accountable for their actions, and promote rehabilitation and reintegration.
For more, https://aldhaheriinternational.com/services/criminal-laws/
Explanation:
Jeff i accued of hoplifting at a department tore he i arreted goe to trial and i found not guilty the ditrict attorney however after the trail i given new videotape evidence that jeff did in fact hoplift jeff i brought to trial again for the ame act of hoplifting
Answer:
Double Jeopardy
Explanation:
If new video evidence is found after Jeff's initial trial that shows he did in fact commit the act of shoplifting, he could be brought to trial again for the same act. This is known as double jeopardy. In the United States, the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution protects against double jeopardy, but it applies only to criminal trials and not to civil trials. So, Jeff can be brought to trial again for the same act in a civil trial.
2.05 quiz the political party system in america
1. First Party System?
2. Democrats?
3. abolitionist?
4. Republican Party?
The political party system in America was called the First Party System.
The political party system that existed in the United States between roughly 1792 and 1824 is periodized using the First Party System, a model of American politics used in history and political science.
It featured two national political parties vying for control of the presidency, Congress, and states: the Federalist Party, mostly founded by Alexander Hamilton, and the Republican Party, often known as the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican Party.
Up until 1800, the Federalists held sway, and afterward, the Republicans held sway.
Both parties started out in national politics but quickly broadened their strategies to win over voters and supporters in every state.
The Republican Party won over the planters and farmers, while the Federalists won over the commercial community.
To know more about first party system, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774490
#SPJ4
What does the term judicial review means Mcq?
The ability of the High Courts of India to challenge the Supreme Court of India is known as judicial review.
What does it mean to have judicial review?A court proceeding known as judicial review involves a judge evaluating the legality of a public body's decision or action. To put it another way, judicial reviews do not address the benefits and drawbacks of a decision but rather the process by which it was reached.
In India, what does the term "judicial review" mean?The term "judicial review" refers to the authority of the Supreme Court or other High Courts to examine a law's constitutionality. If the Court determines that the law violates the Constitution, it is declared unconstitutional and unenforceable.
To learn more about judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
The second amendment is as necessary as oxygen is to Americans. It is the right to ownand carry a firearm or weapon. The second amendment has changed .
The second amendment gives the right to own and carry a firearm or weapon.
This decision was a breakthrough for the Second Amendment rights..
"A well-regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, must not be infringed," states the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Here, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" in the Second Amendment could establish an individual constitutional right to own weapons.
According to this "individual right argument," the Constitution of the United States forbids legislative bodies from outright banning the possession of firearms, or at the very least, the Second Amendment presumes that such laws are illegal.
Also, "a well regulated Militia" could suggest that the Framers intended only to restrict Congress from legislating away a state's right to self-defense.
According to collective rights, citizens do not have an individual right to own firearms, and as a result, local, state, and federal legislative bodies are in charge of regulating them without affecting the constitutional right.
To know more about Second Amendments, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ4
What is the difference between a lawyer and an attorney in the US?
An attorney in the US is a person or a member who is of the legal profession. Whereas, a lawyer is someone who is trained in the field of law and also provides advice and aid on any legal matter.
An attorney has taken and also passed the bar exam, this means that they tend to personally represent the clients in the courts and liaise with the members of the judiciary. Thus, the lawyers who have not passed the bar exam can only assume the role of an advisory to their clients.
However, being able in order to represent a client in a court of law is considered to be the most significant difference between an attorney and a lawyer.
To learn more about the attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/15362752
#SPJ4
The term that refers to conducting research to prepare for a trial is
Osteganography
O metadata
O paralegal
O discovery
Answer: Discovery
Explanation: It's a procedure in which parties use to gather information before a trial.
b) expenses for the recovery of rent is ₹600
c) maintenance allowance paid to the step mother ₹12000 anually which was a charges on the property according to his father's will.
The house remained vacant for 1 month during the previous year, find out the income from House property for assessment year 2022-2023
The income from house property for the assessment year 2022-2023 would be 59400.
How can the income be calculated?To calculate the income from the house property for the assessment year 2022-2023, we need to determine the net annual value (NAV) of the property. The NAV is calculated by subtracting allowable deductions from the annual letting value (ALV) of the property.
The ALV of the property is 80000.
Allowable deductions include:
Municipal taxes of 8000
Expenses for the recovery of rent of 600
Maintenance allowance paid to the stepmother of 12000 (as per father's will)
So, NAV = ALV - Allowable Deductions
= 80000 - (8000 + 600 + 12000)
= 80000 - 20600
= 59400
Since the property remained vacant for one month during the previous year, the income from house property for the assessment year 2022-2023 would amount to 59400.
learn more about income: https://brainly.com/question/25745683
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Mr. Ram owns a house property. its annual letting value is 80000. during the previous year,it was let out to a tenant on a monthly rent of 7000. he claimed the following:
a) municipal taxes rs. 8000
b) expenses for the recovery of rent of rs. 600
c) maintenance allowance paid to the step mother rs. 12000 annually which was a charge on the property according to his father's will.
The house remained vacant for one month during previous year, find out the income from house property for the assessment year 2022- 2023.
1. underground railroad nat turner 2. uncle tom's cabin david walker 3. called slave holders criminals harriet tubman 4. recommended the use of violence to gain freedom frederick douglass 5. led a slave revolt in virginia william l. garrison 6. published the north star harriet beecher stowe
The Underground Railroad was a network of secret routes and safe houses used by enslaved African Americans to escape to freedom, Nat Turner was an enslaved African American who led a rebellion in Virginia in 1831.
Uncle Tom's Cabin is a novel by Harriet Beecher Stowe that was published in 1852, it depicted the harsh realities of slavery and helped to fuel the abolitionist movement. David Walker was an African American abolitionist who wrote the "Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World" which called for the immediate abolition of slavery.
Harriet Tubman was an African American abolitionist and political activist who helped enslaved people escape to freedom through the Underground Railroad. She also served as a scout and spy for the Union Army during the Civil War. She called slave holders criminals.
Frederick Douglass was an African American abolitionist, women's suffragist, orator, and writer. He was a former slave who gained his freedom and recommended the use of violence to gain freedom.
Nat Turner led a slave revolt in Virginia in 1831, which resulted in the deaths of over 50 white people. It was one of the most significant slave uprisings in the United States.
William Lloyd Garrison was an American abolitionist and journalist who founded The Liberator, a newspaper that advocated for the immediate abolition of slavery. Harriet Beecher Stowe was an American abolitionist and author who wrote Uncle Tom's Cabin, which depicted the brutal realities of slavery and helped to fuel the abolitionist movement. She also published the North Star.
Find more about Underground Railroad
brainly.com/question/14380034
#SPJ4
Question:-Who led a slave revolt in Virginia?Who published the North Star?Who called slave holders criminals?Who recommended the use of violence to gain freedom?Who was the author of Uncle Tom's Cabin?
Who was involved in the Underground Railroad and Nat Turner's slave revolt?
How many justices sit on the CA Supreme Court, and why is that number
significant?
Answer:
The California Supreme Court, which was established in 1849, is the state's final appeals court and consists of seven judges. Patricia Guerrero is the court's current chief. As of January 2023, six of the court's judges had been chosen by Democratic governors, while the seventh had been chosen by a Republican governor.
How can you remove a federal judge?
A federal judge is removed by the impeachment process.
Judges are not frequently impeached and are usually only dismissed for severe moral or legal transgressions like perjury, fraud, or conflicts of interest
Despite the fact that there are several procedures for impeaching judges under federal and state constitutions, the process typically consists of two parts.
A resolution to remove a federal judge from office may be passed by the House of Representatives in accordance with Article I of the US Constitution.
The Senate could then hold a trial to determine whether or not removal is required.
The House has the authority to remove a judge from office with a simple majority vote. The Senate must convict a judge by a vote of two-thirds of its members in order to remove them from office after a trial.
To know more about impeachment of judge, click here:
brainly.com/question/30154619
#SPJ4
What are some of the reasons why an attorney may choose to decline representation?
Some of the reasons why an attorney may choose to decline representation is that, they conflict with other cases that the attorney is handling.
If an attorney does not believe that he or she can thus present a winning argument, then it is in the best interests of the client in order to find another attorney who is much better suited in oder to handle your case. Thus, the another reason that why the attorneys tend to reject cases is that they conflict with other cases which the attorney is handling currently.
However, an attorney cannot refuse in order to take a client representation unless he or she is seen to be engaged in some other case. Thus, by refusing in order to accept a client's brief, you are seen to be violating a person's right to be defended.
To learn more about the attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/15362752
#SPJ4
how did the covid-19 pandemic affect how judges handled cases?
Answer: it was very affective
Explanation:
many trials were suspended and many case began to rise like crazy some cases would only last up to 5 min