The answer is False.
What should boaters do when operating a vessel on different waterways?
Answer:
Pay that country
Explanation:
They have free access to their own registered country, most register under Liberia, they have very little tax
When operating a vessel on different waterways the boaters should not spread non-native species to another area.
What is waterways?
Waterways is one of the form of water body through which ships can be navigated.
The species of non-natives should not be spread by the boaters in another area by operating a vessel on different waterways. They should maintain a safer speed, also helped other vessel if seen outside and the communications from the radio etc. can be applied by other waterways.
Therefore, the boaters should not spread non-native species at the time of working on a vessel.
Learn more about the waterways in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/2453542
#SPJ5
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
Bentham and Kant agree on which of the following?
a) Pleasure is the only thing that is good without qualification.
b) Individual rights limit what can be done in the name of maximizing aggregate happiness.
c) The good will is the only thing that is good without qualification.
d) Maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is all that matters, morally speaking.
e) Morality constrains individual self-interest.
Answer:
d) Maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is all that matters, morally speaking.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 and he died in 1804. He was a German modern philosopher who was known for some of his unique views on taste, sensation, respect, pleasure and pain. Jeremy Bentham was an English philosopher, who was born in 1748 and died in 1832.
Jeremy Bentham wrote in his utilitarian principle that, 'actions are right if they produce pleasure and avoid pain'. He believes that all actions of man are subject to and detected by pain and pleasure. Immanuel Kant agrees with him in the believe that the morality of our actions are right if they produce the feeling pleasure, when he said in the Groundwork, that "man's reason have the capacity to induce a feeling of pleasure or of delight in the fulfillment of duty"
So both philosophers agree that there are moral backing for our actions, and they are aimed at limiting the pain we suffer and maximizing pleasure.
Answer:
E
Explanation: Bentham and Kant agree on which of the following?
a) Incorrect. Kant does not believe that the only thing that is good without qualification is pleasure. Rather, Kant believes that the only thing that is good without qualification is the good will ("Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will." I. Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, First Section, Transition from the common rational knowledge of morality to the philosophical).
b) Incorrect. While Kant believes that individual rights limit what can be done in the name of maximizing aggregate happiness, Bentham does not.
c) Incorrect. While Kant believes that the good will is the only thing that is good without qualification, Bentham believes that the good is best characterized in terms of pleasure.
d) Incorrect. While Bentham believes that maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is all that matters, morally speaking, Kant does not (Kant is not a utilitarian).
e) Correct. Both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or her self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if it is in one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one should maximize everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
Robert is about to graduate college, and his parents tell him that because he is the first member of the family to graduate college, they want to buy him a new, but inexpensive, car. They have the money to buy the car, and Robert is excited about getting his gift. Robert owns a used car but has never owned a new car, so this will be his first. He decides to keep his used-car because he had been promised a new car by his parents for his high school graduation and never got it. On graduation day, his parents tell him that they have decided to use the car money for a vacation and there will be no new car. Legal recourse?
Answer:
Robert cannot successfully sue because he did not rely to his detriment on the promise
Explanation:
Racecourse is a person's resort, soliciting or soliciting the courts, another person, manufacturer of a product, assistance or protectionLegal intercourse, on the other hand, is a deliberate act (action) performed by an individual, group or corporation for a permanent solution to legal difficulties. It comes in a suit, petition or other way. Promissory estoppel can be defined as rules, principles, or laws that prohibit a party from acting differently, even if the first party does not promise, and the other party relies on the promise made and worked for it, but in Robert's case, he does not believe in the promise but his own used car.
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract. In favor or against it. Discuss (20 marks)
Note:please the answer should be at least 800 words.
Please add references below the answer(use APA format including author's last name and year of publication, for direct quotations include the page number as well and all websites used to retrieve materials must be referenced)
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
Lois considers herself an act utilitarian. Accordingly, which of the following statements is Lois MOST likely to make?
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding silence as​ misrepresentation?
a. Silence can constitute misrepresentation if there is a fiduciary relationship between the contracting parties.
b. Silence can constitute misrepresentation if federal and state statutes require disclosure.
c. ​Generally, each party to a contract owes a duty to disclose all the facts to the other party.
d. Silence can constitute misrepresentation if​ non-disclosure would cause death.
e. Silence can constitute misrepresentation if​ non-disclosure would cause bodily injury.
Answer:
c. Generally, each party to a contract owes a duty to disclose all the facts to the other party.
Explanation:
in law,silence does not lead to any legal liability.contractual relationship between 2 or more parties, there is generally no duty to disclose anything to the other side as just keeping silence does not constitute misrepresentation
What is a "poison pill" in the US? (also called "shareholders' rights plan). How does it work? Why does it render the acquisition of further shares in a target company, fruitless or impossibly expensive?
Thanks!!
Answer:
A poison pill is a defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage hostile takeover attempts. Poison pills allow existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.A poison pill is a defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage hostile takeover attempts. Poison pills allow existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.
The supreme court serves what important function in the us federal goverment
Explanation:
The supreme court has its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government. the president and Congress, recognizes the limits of it's own power
What happens first when a bill is introduced in the house?
Answer:
The House votes to approve or reject the bill. Than the bill goes back to the committee and they approve or make changes. It will g back and forth until the bill gets to the president. If the president accepts the bill, it becomes a law. If the president "vetoes" the bill, it goes all the way back to the starting line. All the houses are equal, and a bill may take years and still not become a law. It can take the rest of someone's life, it all just depends what the different houses think about the changes and acceptions or the bill.
Explanation:
Banking Problems. Constance and Blair are both loan officers at ABC Bank. Constance, being somewhat dishonest, tells Henry, a customer of the bank who is wealthy and rarely checks the status of outstanding loans and balances, that she is collecting money for a local animal shelter. She asks him to sign a pledge that he will contribute $50 to the animal shelter. In fact, she had him sign a promissory note made out to her for $5,000, which she later endorsed to Richard. Henry proceeds back to one of his businesses, a used car dealership. Taylor comes in to purchase a used car. He and Henry agree that Taylor will purchase a used car for $3,000. Martha also comes in, and she and Henry agree that she will purchase a used car for $4,000. Both Taylor and Martha make out promissory notes payable to Henry. At the end of the day, Henry is looking through the notes and decides that Taylor's was mistakenly made out for $3,000. Henry mistakenly, but honestly, believed that the deal was for $3,500. Therefore, he changes the note to reflect that Taylor owed $3,500. Henry, on the other hand, simply did not like Martha. He decided that $4,000 was not enough for the car. Accordingly, he changed the note to $4,500. Which of the following is true regarding Martha's liability to Henry?
a. He will be liable because an official banking document was involved. 0 O He can claim fraud in the inducement
b. He will be liable without further inquiry unless he can establish that the note had not been endorsed to a holder in due course.
c. He can claim fraud in the factum, and whether he is liable or not will depend upon whether a court determines that he should have known what he was signing
d. He will not be liable, because a party is never liable when the party signed a negotiable instrument without knowing that it is, in fact, a negotiable instrument
Answer:C
Explanation:
Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that the Martha's personal liability to Henry will be such that he can claim fraud in the factum, and whether he is liable or not will depend upon whether a court determines that he should have known what he was signing. Therefore, the option C holds true.
What is the significance of personal liability?Personal liability can be referred to or considered as the liability that has to be borne by the person in his or her individual capacity. For example, a sole proprietorship has personal liability, wherein the owner of the business is liable for all the losses in an organization, if any.
For the above situation, Martha will be decided by law is he is personally liable towards Henry. This is because he is given the protection to claim fraud in the factum, and the liability of Martha will be determined by the verdict or the decision given by a court of law in this regard.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of personal liability.
Learn more about personal liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/28222036
#SPJ5
Which diagram correctly arranges systems of government in order from least powerful to most powerful?
A. Constitutional, Authoritarian, Anarchy
B. Authoritarian, Anarchy, Constitutional
C. Totalitarian, Constitutional, Authoritarian
D. Anarchy, Authoritarian, Totalitarian
Anarchy, Authoritarian, and totalitarianism correctly arrange systems of government in order from least powerful to most powerful. Thus option D is correct.
What is government?The group of people who make up a municipal unit's or an institution's regulatory agency. An organized population is governed by a system or group of individuals, typically a state. The government often consists of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the situation of its broad integrative definition.
Anarchy is a condition of disarray brought on by a lack of respect for or disregard for authority or other governing mechanisms.
Authoritarianism is supporting or imposing slavish submission to authority, particularly that of the government, somewhere at expense of human freedom.
Totalitarianism is a kind of government that demands total submission to authority and is autocratic and centralized.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about the government, Here:
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ5
Which statement alligns with the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs board of education
Answer:
Separate treatment based on race is inherently unequal.
Explanation:
A change in or addition to the constitution is called a
Answer:
amendment
Explanation:
Answer:
Amendment
Explanation:
WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AFTER A COMMITEE HAS REPORTED A MEASURE TO THE SENATE
Answer:
A congressional debate takes place and members vote on the measure.
Darren set up a land trust so that his children could benefit from his real estate investments after he dies. He asked his financial advisor Tom to manage the trust. Darren is the _______.
Answer:Darren is the TRUSTOR
Explanation:
A TRUSTOR also known as settlor or grantor is one who creates a trust and transfers fiduciary duty on property to another person who is the trustee to manage the asset for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
Here, Darren, The Trustor sets up a land trust for the benefit of his children the beneficiaries and gives Tom , the Trustee to manage on behalf of his children.
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract, discuss. 700 words limit
The APA referencing style
Answer is given below
Explanation:
The contract is a branch of private law. It is concerned with private obligations arising in relation to natural and artificial people's symmetrical relations, rather than public obligations arising in relation to hierarchical relations between individuals and state. The contract is specific, at least in its traditional expression, to the obligations of the selected, or voluntary, obligations - that is, the obligations set out by the parties' intentions. This entry describes the doctrinal and theoretical accounts of contract law - with particular emphasis on the law of torture and antitrust law, contract law, and the relationship between two close neighbor. Law is a very interesting discipline and honestly speaking, law is a discipline that deals with other careers or disciplines or professions. Every work or work or profession has its own law. The law binds people and their every move or way of doing thing. Law is a practical discipline because all you have to do is apply it, whatever it is (the law) has a lot of applications. For example, using LAW OF CONTRACT as a specific reference must be done in accordance with the law, if anything happens in a contract.a. If you were the Garrett family's attorney, what arguments would you make at the trial? What
evidence would you want to introduce during the trial?
Answer:
Since Mrs Garrett had died suffering from lung cancer as a result of having been smoking cigarettes for 20 years, suing ABC Tobacco Company I'd have argued that it was these cigarettes from the aforementioned company that resulted in her developing a cancer of the lungs and subsequently dying from it. As evidence, I would present her medical reports that state clearly and without a shadow of doubt that the cause of death in her case was indeed lung cancer.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
The evidence that Garrett family's attorney should introduce during the trial is that Mrs. Garrett died of lung cancer.
Based on the complete information, it was stated that Mrs. Garrett dues from lung cancer due to the fact that she had been smoking cigarettes for quite a number of years.
Therefore, this will have been presented as evidence to sue ABC Tobacco company that it was the cigarettes that led to cancer that she had and the eventual death.
The medical report that showed that she had cancer should also be presented to support the claim.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/15558413
Celia Tapia (DOB 05/18/1970) experiences issues with repeated urinary tract infections. She is in the office today to provide a clean catch urine specimen. Around 10:30 am, after providing the specimen and while washing her hands, she spilled water on the floor and slipped. Dr. Martin and the Medical Assistant assisted Ms. Tapia back to her exam room. The medical staff has been notified and it was decided that an absorbent mat should be placed in front of the sink so this doesn’t happen again. Dr. Martin determined that Ms. Tapia developed minor bruising. Complete an Incident Report for this accident.
Answer:
Incident Report on Celia Tapia
Date: June 3, 2020 Time: 10.32 am. Location: Women's Room C16
Facts:
1. Celia Tapia (DOB 05/18/1970) visited the office to provide a clean catch urine specimen due to repeated urinary tract infections.
2. Around 10:30 am, after providing the specimen and while washing her hands, she spilled water on the floor and slipped.
3. She was assisted back to her exam room by Dr. Martin and the Medical Assistant.
4. The medical staff was notified immediately.
5. Ms Tapia developed minor bruising, according to Dr. Martin.
Analysis:
1. The accident was caused by water that spilled on the floor while Ms Tapia was washing her hands.
2. The floor requires to be dry at all times.
Recommendation:
1. An absorbent mat should be placed in front of the sink to forestall future occurrence.
Witnesses:
Dr. Martin and his medical assistant
Explanation:
a) Incident: An incident is an event (illness, injury, near miss, and accident) that happens at a time in a particular location.
b) An incident report is a formal one to document all workplace illnesses, injuries, near misses, and accidents. An incident report should be completed at the time an incident occurs no matter how minor an injury is.
c) The purpose of recording an incident report is to enable full investigations to be initiated and remedial actions be taken. It also helps in case there is a legal claim.
ALAP
What is law really
Five (5) grounds upon which the Registrar can lawfully refuse to register a partnership
Answer: The five grounds are based on the law based on which the registrar can refuse the dealing of properties between two or more parties.
Explanation:
1. The power of attorney holder dies or the attorney has canceled the right of sale of the property.
2. If the seller is minor cannot sell the property.
3. If there is overwriting or cutting or any kind of document alternation on the deed.
4. If any court has kept a stay order on the property deed.
5. If the identity of the seller is in doubt.